Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In the Matter of :-
XXXXXX … Applicant/Respondent
Versus
XXXXXXXX … Respondents/Applicant
Application u/s 25 of guardian and wards act 1890 for
the custody of minor child XXXXX to the applicant
who is now the custody of the Respondents.
******
Application for strike off the name in application u/s
25 as array of the parties as Respondent no. 2 &
3/Applicants in the Interest of justice.
1. That the above mentioned matter is pending and fixed for today and
Respondent No. 2 &3 /Applicants are senior citizen and having aged
they are too week as he never walked without any support/help and
on PGI Chandigarh.
Applicant.
the custody of minor ABC, because they are not residing with
2 & 3 is not good, after the few days of marriage of applicant and she
beaten the Respondent No.2 & 3, but Respondent no. 2 & 3/Applicants
was kept mum due to the save of matrimonial life of Respondent no. 1
and Applicant.
5. That the cruel behavior of the Applicant has day to day increased
Respondent no. 2 & 3/Applicants has done separation and given the
Applicant.
6. That the applicant is a greedy lady and she is an advocate so, she
openly stated as she knows the law and tools of law, manipulation
which is required to obtain good orders and she is stating openly that
she will sell the property to any third party only on the basis of
various FIR’s regarding the grabbing of the land. The FIR(s) details
due to radio jokey and she did domestic violence with Respondent no
2 & 3/Applicants.
PRAYER
present case
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
….Respondent no 2
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
….Respondent no 3
Through Counsel
IN THE HON’BLE COURT OF xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
GW/xxx/xxxx
Affidavit
Xxxxxxxxxxx … Applicant
Versus
Xxxxxxxxxx … Respondents
Date:-02.03.2021 Deponent
Verification:-
declare that the above statement of mine is true and correct to the best of my
Date:-02.03.2021 Deponent