Concrete

CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS
Concrete Quantities
Cubic Yards

10 100
Pieces Of Equipment
Q Equipment foundations
Q Equipment structure foundations
@ Pipe rack and sleeper foundations
 Piping 251

FIELD FURNISH, FABRICATE,

AND ERECT PIPE,FITTINGS,
AND VALVES
Linear Feet Of Pipe For Pieces Of Equipment

P i e c e s Of Equipment
Q Carbon steel 2%" and over
@ Carbon steel 2 " and under
@ Steam tracin~
 Structural Steel and Miscella.neousIron

STRUCTURAL STEEL
Tons Required

10 100
Pieces Of Equipment
238 Structural Steel and ~ e o u Iron
s

MISCELLANEOUS IRON
Tons Required

I, ,! . . . , !m . , . .
! !
s
!
. I .
'. l i f
I
,
"
1
! W
1 4 1 . 1 ,,,, 1 , . .1 . 1 I . .
I
. I . , I . , . ,
u
,U

10 100
Pieces Of Equipment
-'.. 270 Instrumentation

INSTRUMENTS
Total Number Of Instruments Required

10 100
Pieces Of Equipment
 Insulation 277

INSULATING MATERIAL
Total Square Feet

10 100
Pieces Of Equipment

0 Pipe
@ Equipment
 > -. . 322 Ratio Estimating Factors

CHEMICAL PLANT-LIQUID HIGH PRESSURE TYPE

4000 TO 5000 PSI
Ratio Percentages
Direct Cost

Average
Percent
Percentage Ratio Ranges of Totals
Discipline I ' II I11 IV V VI VII
-- 1. Process Equipment
- 2. Site Preparation
1 3. Site .Improvements
--A

- 4 Concrete
- 5. Structural Steel
-- 6. Buildings- -
i 7. Underground Piping
8. Above-ground Piping
9. Underground Electric
10. Above-ground Electric
11. Instrumentation
-12. Insulation
13. Painting
14. Paving
15. Proratables
** Total Direct Cost
* Not applicable or no significant trend data available.
Roman Numeral Codes:
I. Discipline, Other Materials as a percent of Process Equipment costs. (1,l)
11. Discipline, Subcontracts as a percent of Process Equipment costs. (1,l)
111. Discipline, Direct Labor as a percent of Process Equipment costs. (1,l)
IV. Discipline, Material cost as a percent of Total Material costs. (IV**)
V. Discipline, Subcontract cost as a percent of Total Subcontract costs. (V**)
I VI.. Discipline, Labor cost as a percent of Total Labor cost.- . ( ~- 6 3
YII. Discipline, Total cost as a percent of Total Direct cost. (VII**) '
 Ratio Estimating Factors 323

CHEMICAL PLANT-LIQUID HIGH ALLOY TYPE

Ratio Percentages
Direct Cost

Average
Percent
Percentage ~ a t i oRanges of Totals
Discipline I II I11 IV V VI VII
1. Process Equipment
2. Site Preparation
3. Site Improvements
4, Concrete
5. Structural Steel
6. Buildings
7. Underground Piping
8. Above-ground Piping
9. Underground Electric
10. Above-ground Electric
11. Instrumentation
12. Insulation
13. Painting
14. Paving
15. Proratables
** Total Direct Cost 217.3-226.0 32.77-35.02 65.76-73.72 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

* Not applicable or no sigmficant trend data available.

Roman Numeral Codes:
I. Discipline, Other Materials as a percent of Process Equipment costs. (1,l)
11. Discipline, Subcontracts as a percent of Process Equipment costs. (1,l)
111. Discipline, Direct Labor as a percent of Process Equipment costs. (1,l)
IV. Discipline, Material cost as a percent of Total Material costs. (IV**)
V. Discipline, Subcontract cost as a percent of Total Subcontract costs. (V**)
VI. Discipline, Labor cost as a percent of Total Labor cost. (VI**)
VII. Discipline, Total cost as a percent of Total Direct cost. (VII**)
 Ratio Estimating Faotora

LIQUIDISOLID TYPE CHEMICAL PLANTS

Ratio Percentages
Direct Cost

Average
percent
Percentage Ratio Ranges of Totals
Discipline I I1 I11 IV V VI VII
1. Process Equipment
2. Site Preparation
3. Site Improvements
4. Concrete
5. Structural Steel
6. Buildings
7. Underground Piping
8. ~bove-&o;nd Piping
9. Underground Electric
10. Above-ground Electric
11. Instrumentation
12. Insulation
13. Painting
14. Paving
15. Proratables
** Total Direct Cost 237.2-249.7 35.57-39.12 79.15-92.95 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

* Not applicable or no siflicant trend data available.

Roman Numeral Codes:
I. Discipline, Other Materials as a percent of Process Equipment costs. (I,1)
11. Discipline, Subcontracts as a percent of Process Equipment costs. (1,l)
111. Discipline, Direct Labor as a percent of Process Equipment costs. (1,l)
IV. Discipline, Material cost as a percent of Total Material costs. (IV**)
V. Discipline, Subcontract cost as a percent of Total Subcontract costs. (V**)
VI. Discipline, Labor cost as a percent of Total Labor cost. (VI**)
VII. Discipline, Total cost as a percent of Total Direct cost. (VII*")
 ..
~ . ,,
- 320 Ratio Estimating Factors

SOLID TYPE CHEMICAL PLANTS

Ratio Percentages
Direct Cost

Average
Percent
Percentage Ratio Ranges of Totals
Discipline I II I11 IV V VI VII
1. Process Equipment
2. Site Preparation
3. Site Improvements
4. Concrete
5. Structural Steel
6. Buildings
7. Underground Piping
8. Above-ground Piping
9. Underground Electric
10. Above-ground Electric
11. Instrumentation
12. Insulation
13. Painting
14. Paving
15. Proratables
** Total Direct Cost
* Not applicable or no signit'icant trend data available.
Roman Numeral Codes:
I. Discipline, Other Materials as a percent of Process Equipment costs. (1,l)
11. Discipline, Subcontracts as a percent of Process Equipment costs. (1,l)
111. Discipline, Direct Labor as a percent of Process Equipment costs. (1,l)
IV. Discipline, Material cost as a percent of Total Material costs. (IV**)
V. Discipline, Subcontract cost as a percent of Total Subcontract costs. (V**)
VI. Discipline, Labor cost as a percent of Total Labor cost. (VI**)
VII. Discipline, Total cost as a percent of Total Direct cost. (VII**)
 Ratio Estimating Factors

LIQUID TYPE CHEMICAL PLANT

Ratio Percentages
Direct Cost

Average
Percent
Percentage Ratio Ranges of Totals
-- -
Discipline
-
I II 111 IV V VI VII
1. Process Equipment
2. Site Preparation
3. Site Improvements
4. Concrete
5. Structural Steel
6. Buildings
7. Underground Piping
8. ~bove-groundPiping
9. Underground Electric
10. Above-ground Electric
11. Instrumentation
12. Insulation
13. Painting
14. Paving
15. Proratables - --

** Total Direct Cost 217.9-237.5 32.57-36.43 68.7-85.7 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

* Not applicable or no significant trend data available.

Roman Numeral Codes:
I. Discipline, Other Materials as a percent of Process Equipment costs. (1,l)
11. Discipline, Subcontracts as a percent of Process Equipment costs. (1,l)
111. Discipline, Direct Labor as a percent of Process Equipment costs. (1,l)
IV. Discipline, Material cost as a percent of Total Material costs. (IV**)
V. Discipline, Subcontract cost as a percent of Total Subcontract costs. (V**)
VI. Discipline, Labor cost as a percent of Total Labor cost. (VI**)
VII. Discipline, Total cost as a percent of Total Direct cost. (VII**)
 318 Ratio Estimating Factors

REFINERY PROCESS SYSTEMS

Ratio Percentages
Direct Cost

Average
Percent
.5.
Percentage Ratio Ranges of Totals
Discipline I-. I1 I11 IV v VI VII
1. Process Equipment 49.97
2. Site Preparation 1-01
3. Site Improvements 0.69
4. Concrete 5.63
5. Structural Steel 3.90
6. Buildings 1.71
7. underground Piping 0.83
8. Above-ground Piping is.19
9. Underground Electric 0.32
10. Above-ground Electric 5.81
11. Instrumentation 4.48
12. Insulation 3.94
13. Painting 1.84
14. Paving 0.36
15. Proratables 1.32 -

** lbtal Direct Cost 176.9-183.3 47.6-48.2 77.0-79.7 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

* Not applicable or no signifkant trend data available.

Roman Numeral Codes:
I. Discipline, Other Materials as a percent of Process EqGpment costs. (1,l)
11. Discipline, Subcontracts as a percent of Process Equipment costs. (1,l)
111. Discipline, Direct Labor as a percent of Process Equipment costs. (1,l)
IV. Discipline, Material cost as a percent of Total Material costs. (IV**)
V. Discipline, Subcontract cost as a percent of Total Subcontract costs. (V**)
VI. Discipline, Labor cost as a percent of Total Labor cost. (VI**)
VII. Discipline, Total cost as a percent of Total Direct cost. (VII**)