You are on page 1of 2

Collision Avoidance at Intersections using Vehicle

Detectors and Smartphones


Akhil M.∗ , Nirmala Vasudevan† , Ullas Ramanadhan∗ , Alin Devassy∓ ,
Dilip Krishnaswamy∀ , Anand Ramachandran∗
∗Amrita Center for Wireless Networks and Applications, Amrita University,
† Department of Physics, Amrita University, ∓ Robert Bosch GmbH, ∀ IBM Research
Email:{akhilnarayan9, aalinandu}@gmail.com, {ullas, nirmalav, anandramachandran}@am.amrita.edu, dilip@ieee.org

Abstract—Traffic accidents are the leading cause of death for Almost all recent work on intersection collision avoidance
people aged 15 to 29 and the eighth leading cause of death proposed the use of Global Positioning System (GPS) to
globally. Accidents at intersections are common, since vehicles accurately determine the location of the vehicle and the time
approaching the intersection are not always visible to one another.
Conventional methods, such as the use of traffic lights, and newer when it is expected at the intersection [2], [3], [4], [5].
solutions that make use of GPS and VANET are not particularly Typical GPS accuracy ranges from a few meters to approxi-
effective in India for reasons of adaptability, accuracy, cost and mately 20m; differential GPS (DGPS) can provide an accuracy
availability. Our solution promises to be both inexpensive and of 1−3m [6]. Since this accuracy is not sufficient for collision
effective in India. We propose to install a few inexpensive vehicle avoidance, the use of supplementary sensors and software
detectors (VDs) near intersections. When a vehicle approaches
the intersection, it will pass the VDs sequentially which will then were proposed in these solutions. These systems typically
transmit their unique IDs to a smartphone in the vehicle. The used vehicular ad hoc networks (VANET) for communication
smartphone will transmit the VDs’ IDs and relevant kinematic between vehicles. However such systems are not feasible in
data to a base station at the intersection. Thus, the base station India, as we elaborate in the following paragraphs.
can accurately compute the times when vehicles are expected First, GPS systems in India are significantly less accurate
at the intersection. In the event of a potential collision, the
base station will transmit a warning to the smartphones of the than those available in many other countries around the world.
concerned drivers. Moreover, only a few Indian cars are fitted with a GPS module,
Keywords—Intersection collision avoidance, Vehicle detector and even fewer cars have a GPS device that can provide results
(VD), Road side unit (RSU), VANET, V2V Communication, V2I with the accuracy needed for the collision avoidance problem.
communication, Dedicated Short Range Communication (DSRC), Second, the two VANET technologies—vehicle to vehicle
Differential GPS (DGPS) (V2V) and vehicle to infrastructure (V2I) communication—
are scheduled to be released in the U.S. market only in
I. I NTRODUCTION
2017. It is unknown when these two technologies will become
Traffic accidents are the leading cause of death for people available in India. Moreover, these technologies are likely to be
aged 15 to 29, and the eighth leading cause of death globally expensive. Dedicated Short Range Communication (DSRC), a
[1]. Intersection collisions are very common, and account for frequency band of 75 MHz around 5.9 GHz, is used for both
approximately 30% of all vehicle collisions [2]. The primary V2V and V2I communication. However, some of the existing
problem at intersections is that a vehicle approaching an literature suggest that DSRC is not suited for intersection
intersection often cannot see other oncoming vehicles due to collision avoidance due to its limited range and coverage [7].
walls, buildings, trees, or other obstructions on the corner. The The solution outlined in this concept paper combines the
driver has no knowledge of an imminent collision, and cannot ideas of using inexpensive vehicle detectors [8] to deter-
take appropriate action to prevent it. mine vehicle locations accurately and smart phones for V2V
A conventional method for collision avoidance at intersec- communication [9]. The novel contribution of this proposal is
tions is through the use of traffic lights. In India, people to combine these two ideas in order to develop a solution
typically comply with traffic light laws at the busier inter- for collision avoidance at uncontrolled intersections that is
sections of metropolitan cities. However, at intersections in inexpensive, feasible and easily adaptable.
both urban and rural India where there is minimal traffic, This solution is particularly suited to India as India may
it is very difficult to enforce traffic rules. Even if traffic well become the second largest country of smartphone users
lights are installed at these intersections, people tend to ignore in the world by 2016 [10]. In fact, most drivers may already
them. Moreover, since there is often little traffic on these possess a smartphone, and our solution does not require much
roads, most vehicles approach the intersections at great speeds. additional hardware to be installed in the vehicle.
Consequently, there are a significant number of fatal collisions
at these intersections. Thus, there is a need for an intelligent II. P ROPOSED S OLUTION AND S YSTEM A RCHITECTURE
system that provides a warning of an imminent collision at Our proposed solution involves the installation of a few
such intersections. inexpensive vehicle detectors (VDs) near the intersection as
which is the typical stopping distance for a car travelling at
48 km/hr. The purpose of installing several VDs is to account
for changes in vehicle velocity and acceleration. We assume
that a typical vehicle at these smaller intersections is at most
5 m long, and travels at least at 30 km/hr. Therefore, if at any
time, the difference in the TTXs for any two vehicles is lesser
than a threshold value of 1 s (5m/ (30km/hr) = 0.6 s), the base
station will broadcast a prerecorded warning message with the
relevant vehicle IDs attached to the message. In this manner,
we ensure that only the concerned drivers receive the warning.

III. C ONCLUSION
In this concept paper, we have proposed a cost-effective
solution that promises to address the problem of collisions at
uncontrolled intersections in India. As our next step, we are
Fig. 1. Depiction of proposed solution. Vehicles A, B and C approach the developing a prototype that we plan to test at a nearby rural T-
intersection but Vehicle-A is not visible to Vehicles B and C, and vice-versa. intersection. It is straightforward to extend the ideas contained
But in the event of an imminent collision between Vehicles A and B/C, the
base station will transmit warning messages to smartphones in the concerned in this paper and design a similar system that uses Wi-Fi direct
vehicles. technology, thereby avoiding the need for a base station at the
intersection. With a small enhancement in the Wi-Fi module
shown in Fig. 1. These VDs consist of a magnetic sensor that of the smartphone, DSRC technology can be incorporated into
detects any vehicle that passes by, and a wireless transmitter the proposed system. Then the system will act as an aid for
that transmits the VD’s unique ID to a smartphone in the the emerging DSRC technology. While we address problems
vehicle. With reference to Fig. 1, VDa1, VDa2, ... VDa5 detect in India, these ideas can be easily adapted to solve similar
Vehicle-A; VDb1, VDb2, ... detect Vehicle-B; yet another set problems elsewhere in the world.
of VDs detect Vehicle-C.
The smartphone transmits the VD’s ID, the smartphone’s IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
unique ID, the time when the vehicle passed the VD, and We are grateful to Amar Gilad Gressel for his help in techni-
the vehicle’s speed and acceleration to a base station at the cal writing and to our Chancellor Sri. Mata Amritanandamayi
intersection, using IEEE 802.11 technology (Wi-Fi). All IDs Devi (Amma) for all her support of this work.
should be secured using standard encryption techniques. The R EFERENCES
smartphone can read the speed and acceleration of the vehicle
[1] World Health Organization, “WHO global status report on road safety
using an interface such as the On Board Diagnostics II (OBD) 2013: supporting a decade of action”, World Health Organization, 2013.
system. Since the distance between the VD and the base station [2] R. Miller, and Q. Huang, “An adaptive peer-to-peer collision warning
is known, the base station can compute the time when the system”, IEEE 55th Vehicular Technology Conference, VTC, vol. 1, pp.
31–321, 2002.
vehicle is expected at the intersection (time to intersection – [3] Y. Nakanishi, R. Yamaguchi, K. Fujimoto, T. Wada, and H. Okada, “A
TTX). New Collision Judgment Algorithm for Pedestrian-Vehicular Collision
We propose to install five VDs, 5 m apart (or possibly at Avoidance Support System (P-VCASS) in Advanced ITS”, IEEE 6th Int.
Conf. on Networking and Services, DOI 10.1109/ICNS, 2010.
some non-linear decreasing distance between the VDs), so that [4] P. Shrivastava, V. Lodhi, and S.V. Vargiya, “Vehicle to Vehicle Safety
the first VD is at a distance of 25 m from the intersection, Device - An Ease for Safe Driving” IEEE 2nd Int. Conf. on Computing
for Sustainable Global Development, pp. 251-255, 2015.
[5] M.R. Hafner, and D. Cunningham, “Cooperative Collision Avoidance at
Intersections: Algorithms and Experiments” IEEE Trans. on Intelligent
Transportation Systems, vol. 14, no. 3, pp1162–1175, September 2013.
[6] US Department of Homeland Security. (2015 August 18). NDGPS
General Information. [Online]
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=dgpsMain/
[7] L. Chih Tung, J. Menai, M. Gerla, and C. Sommer “A Cluster Based
Architecture for Intersection Collision Avoidance Using Heterogeneous
Networks” 12th Annual Mediterranean Ad Hoc Networking Workshop
(MED-HOC-NET), pp. 82-88, 2013.
[8] J. Kim, and J. Kim, “Intersection Collision Avoidance using Wireless
Fig. 2. Sequence diagram of communication. Three vehicles approach the Sensor Network”, IEEE Int. Conf. on Vehicular Electronics and Safety
intersection with different speeds. Vehicle-A (Smartphone-A) approaches the ICVES, 2009.
intersection at a moderate speed, and passes VDa1. Simultaneously, Vehicle- [9] K.C. Su, H.M. Wu, W.L. Chang, and Y.H. Chou, “Vehicle-to-Vehicle
B approaches the intersection from another direction and passes VDb1 but Communication System through Wi-Fi Network using Android Smart-
at a slower speed. Hence, the two vehicles reach the intersection at different phone”, Int. Conf. on Connected Vehicles and Expo, pp. 191-196, 2012.
times; no collision occurs, and no warning is transmitted. However, Vehicle-C [10] Indo-Asian News Service. (2015 August 10). India to overtake US in
approaches the intersection and passes VDc1 after a small delay, but with a smartphones by 2016. [Online]
greater speed than Vehicle-A and a possible collision is detected. So warnings http://indiainbusiness.nic.in/newdesign
are transmitted to Vehicles A and C. /index.php?param=newsdetail/10367

You might also like