Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Banks
Year Ahead: Assessing Asset Quality, Growth outlook and
Digital Preparedness
22 December 2021
Asset Quality: Asset Quality outcomes have been better and credit costs have already peaked. MFI slippages / credit costs to
be elevated in 2HFY22. But overall, there could be the beginning of multi-year benign credit costs cycle. ECLGS would be tested
in 3QFY22 but do not see much risks as yet.
Growth: Growth is an issue but has already bottomed out. Large banks well placed and getting aggressive on Commercial
segment and thus we see headwinds for Regional banks. We estimate overall systemic growth to rise to 12-13% YoY by FY23E.
Fin-Tech disruption: See collaborative approach vs competitive approach by Fin-techs; Big disruption if Fin-techs can get the
lending right. RBI WG has proposed strict guidelines for lending by Fin-techs. See most action in SME / small-ticket high volume
retail lending. Commerce enablement could be the new frontier. While this along with AA / OCEN should enlarge the entire SME
pie but potential headwinds for SME focused banks.
Large banks are well placed on Asset Quality, Growth, NIMs, CASA Capital and Digital preparedness.
Mid-size banks still fine-tuning select part of their businesses. SME lending could see transformation changes.
PSU banks - Asset Quality cycle turning is huge cyclical +ve for PSBs though Core PPOP is still weak at <2%.
Top Picks: ICICI, HDFCB and SBI. Kotak is key U/W. Positive Risk rewards for Axis and IIB. See strong case for HDFCB vs KMB.
3
Valuations
Target Mkt Cap RoA (% ) RoE (% ) P/ABV (x) PAT (Rs Bn)
Banks Reco. CMP US$
Price Rs bn
Bn FY22 FY23E FY24E FY22 FY23E FY24E FY22 FY23E FY24E FY22E FY23E FY24E
Private Sector Banks
HDFCB Buy 2000 1426 7,899 104.1 2.0 2.1 2.1 17.7 18.5 18.0 3.2 2.8 2.4 370.4 446.2 538.1
ICICI Buy 950 710 4,929 64.9 1.6 1.8 1.9 13.4 15.0 16.2 2.6 2.1 1.7 231.1 282.9 324.2
Axis Buy 920 674 2,069 27.2 1.5 1.7 1.6 14.3 16.0 15.6 1.8 1.5 1.3 148.4 184.8 217.2
KMB Hold 2000 1743 3,456 45.5 2.0 2.1 2.1 11.7 12.2 12.8 3.9 3.3 2.8 76.9 88.5 107.9
IndusInd Buy 1400 846 655 8.6 1.3 1.7 1.7 10.8 14.3 14.5 1.4 1.3 1.1 48.1 70.4 80.7
Yes Sell 11 13 319 4.2 (0.1) 0.5 0.6 (0.6) 4.1 5.1 1.2 1.1 0.9 (1.9) 13.9 18.6
Federal Buy 125 81 170 2.2 0.9 1.1 1.1 10.9 12.9 13.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 19.7 24.2 30.0
City Union Hold 185 135 100 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 11.6 12.4 12.9 1.8 1.6 1.3 7.1 8.6 10.1
DCB Buy 125 80 25 0.3 0.7 1.0 1.1 8.1 11.4 13.5 0.8 0.7 0.6 3.0 4.5 6.0
Karnataka Sell 55 61 19 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 4.3 3.7 4.6 0.3 0.3 0.3 2.7 2.5 3.1
Karur Vysya Buy 75 43 34 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.0 6.4 10.2 11.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 4.6 7.8 9.7
SIB Sell 7 9 18 0.2 (0.5) 0.2 0.5 (5.3) 4.3 8.8 0.5 0.5 0.4 (2.9) 2.5 4.8
Equitas SFB Buy 85 59 68 0.9 0.9 2.1 2.1 7.8 17.5 19.2 2.1 1.7 1.5 2.7 6.9 8.6
4
Stock performance
PSU
SBI 449 542 248 -17 81 -8 -11 3 9 65 -15
Indian 137 195 74 -30 85 -14 -14 3 -2 57 -28
PNB 37 48 31 -24 17 -9 -12 -4 -9 1 -21
Bank of Baroda 80 108 56 -26 43 -14 -17 2 -0 27 -25
Canara 191 248 105 -23 81 -12 -13 23 29 57 -22
Union 42 55 27 -23 55 -12 -10 22 11 35 -22
Bank of India 50 101 45 -51 10 -13 -16 -11 -34 -0 -24
IDBI 46 65 26 -30 73 -12 -12 23 21 12 -27
Index
Bankex 39,190 47,877 33,316 -18 18 -7 -10 -8 0 11 -17
Bank Nifty 34,440 41,830 28,977 -18 19 -7 -9 -7 -0 12 -16
Sensex 55,822 62,245 44,923 -10 24 -4 -6 -5 7 19 -10
NIFTY 50 16,614 18,604 13,131 -11 27 -4 -6 -4 6 21 -10
Source: Bloomberg, B&K Research
5
Valuations
7
Theme 1: Asset Quality: Covid-19 stress largely
01 over; Start of benign credit costs cycle
8
Asset Quality Super Cycle has ended
• Asset Quality Super Cycle, which started in FY16, has ended. Covid-19 stress also seems limited. GNPAs / NNPAs have
continued their improving trajectory. Net slippages have surprised positively in 2QFY22, suggesting Covid-19 stress was
temporary.
• O/s RSA at 2.6% of loans is much manageable. Quality of restructuring also reasonable with small share of bulky corporate
exposures and higher share of low LGD mortgage and SME loans. RSA window has already been closed.
• MSME stress has been largely addressed by ECLGS. Testing would start from 3QFY22.
• Formal retail has held-up well. Data for staff costs for BSE 500 is encouraging. Banks have re-started Unsecured loans.
Stress remains in select pockets such as MFI, CV, etc. but unlikely to spill-over.
• Banks have strong ~70% PCR on GNPAs. Contingent provisions also healthy. Hence, we see moderation in credit costs across
banks. Credit costs may remain benign for an extended period providing strong character to RoAs and Book value.
Source: Company Data, B&K Research. *Data for 2QFY22 is for B&K coverage
9
Asset Quality Super Cycle has ended
2QFY22 Gross slippages down 23% QoQ; ratio down to 2.9%; Aggregate NNPAs now at ~2.2%.
Credit costs at multi-quarter low leading to healthy uptick in ROAs across banks
• While gross slippages were higher than estimates at Gross / Net NPAs continue improvement
select banks, Net slippages were much better for most of
the banks.
Despite Covid-19 led disruptions, GNPAs / Net NPAs have declined for most of banks
Sharp decline in slippages QoQ. Net of recovery, slippages as low as ~0.1% for Kotak / ICICI
• Lack of moratorium led to sharp rise in GNPAs for MFI business at Bandhan, Equitas, Ujjivan, RBL, IIB etc.
• O/s RSA for MFI vertical is high at 12-14% across Bandhan, Equitas and Ujjivan.
• IIB stands out as MFI RSA is much lower at 3%. It has also provided 100% on MFI GNPAs. However, it has got into ever-greening
allegations at MFI business. We see spike in MFI slippages in IIB in 3QFY22.
• The SMA 1+2 figures have reduced QoQ though it is still above comfortable levels, in our view.
• Within peers, RBL has run the most conservative growth at MFI loans.
Sharp rise in reported stress for MFI segment. SMA 1+2, though down QoQ are still above comfort.
13
PSU Banks: Segmental Stress
Slippages (Non-annualized) (% of
SBIN Indian BOB Canara PNB BOI Union
segmental loans)
Retail NA 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.5
MSME NA 1.1 1.2 0.9 1.2 0.5 1.4
Agri NA 1.2 0.6 0.6 1.0 0.6 0.8
Corporate NA 1.3 0.9 1.5 1.6 0.2 1.3
Total NA 1.0 0.8 1.0 1.3 0.3 1.1
Segment wise RSA % SBIN Indian BOB Canara PNB BOI Union
Retail 1.7 11.8 4.0 8.0 5.3 8.2 7.6
MSME 5.0 13.8 7.3 5.7 4.5 14.1 6.8
Agri - 1.4 NA 0.5 1.7 - 0.3
Corporate 0.8 1.9 2.1 0.9 1.9 3.7 2.4
Total (% of gross loans) 1.5 5.9 2.8 2.8 2.9 5.5 3.8
Total as % of net loans 1.6 6.3 3.0 3.0 3.1 6.1 4.1
Source: Company, B&K Research. Pleasenote that certain assumptions are made in calculating segmental break-up for select banks.
Gross NPA Ratio (%) - Reported SBIN Indian BOB Canara PNB BOI Union
Retail 1.0 4.3 2.8 1.4 5.2 NA 4.2
MSME 8.1 14.6 15.2 13.7 21.7 NA 20.4
Agri 14.8 11.4 9.2 5.7 17.7 NA 12.4
Corporate 7.6 8.8 6.5 10.8 12.6 NA 13.6
Overseas 0.8 12.2 9.1
Total 4.9 9.6 8.1 8.4 13.6 12.0 12.6
Source: B&K Research.
14
O/s Restructured Assets manageable
• Covid-19 restructuring has been benign vs expectations. KMB and Axis have relatively lower RSA
• Kotak and Axis have the lowest RSA at <1% across banks,
while HDFCB has highest RSA at 1.7% within large banks.
Large banks have lower RSA at <2%, while MFI focused banks have 9-10% RSA
Kotak and CUBK have relatively higher O/s ECLGS at >5%, while EquitasB has Nil
Source: Transunion CIBIL, B&K Research Source: Transunion CIBIL, B&K Research
17
ECLGS and Non-ECLGS performance
• Formal retail job market (BSE 500 data) has been resilient
post initial hiccups in 1QFY20 during national lockdown.
Formal job segment remains resilient as indicated by BSE 500 staff costs trends
Source: B&K Research. Please note that we have removed few dozen names to make the data comparable.
19
Net Stress: Large banks remain well placed
Source: Company Data, B&K Research. Note: ICICI and Axis figures are including o/s BB and Below portfolio
Source: Company Data, B&K Research. Note: ICICI and Axis figures are including o/s BB and Below portfolio
20
Credit costs to moderate going ahead
• Credit costs have declined sharply across banks, thanks Credit costs to moderate going ahead
to strong recovery and contained net slippages. Credit Costs (%) FY21 FY22E FY23E FY24E
• Credit costs for private banks are also lower as TWO Public Sector Banks
recovery is now part of provisioning. SBI 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.9
Bank of Baroda 2.0 1.4 1.3 1.2
• However, PSU banks are yet to change TWO recovery re- Canara 2.3 2.1 1.3 1.2
grouping and should do latest by 4QFY22, in our view. Indian 2.1 2.0 1.4 1.4
• Nonetheless, PSU bank provisioning have been favorably Bank of India 1.6 1.1 0.8 0.8
impacted by Dewan resolution in 2QFY22. PNB 3.5 1.9 1.3 1.3
Union 2.4 2.1 1.8 1.6
• We see healthy moderation in Credit Costs YoY going
ahead. Private Sector Banks
HDFCB 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1
Credit costs have moderated sharply ICICI 2.4 1.3 1.1 1.2
Axis 2.1 1.1 0.8 0.8
KMB 0.8 1.2 0.9 0.8
IndusInd 3.5 2.9 1.7 1.7
Federal 1.3 1.1 0.8 0.9
RBL 4.0 4.7 2.1 2.0
Yes 4.9 1.3 0.7 0.7
City Union 2.0 1.9 1.5 1.5
DCB 1.7 1.7 1.1 0.8
Karnataka 2.3 2.4 1.9 1.8
Karur Vysya 1.5 1.7 1.2 1.0
SIB 2.3 3.2 1.6 1.4
Equitas SFB 3.3 3.0 1.5 1.7
Source: Company Data, B&K Research Source: B&K Research.
21
Bank-wise Asset Quality Snapshot
Bank-wise asset quality snapshot: CET1, ECLGS, Gross / Net NPAs, PCR, RSA and Slippages
Gross Slippage Net Slippages
CET-1 O/s O/s RSA
Gross NPAs (%) Net NPAs (%) PCR (%) - 1HFY22 - 1HFY22
Ratio ECLGS -%
(annualised) (annualised)
Banks
% of Change Change
(in %) 2QFY22 2QFY22 2QFY22 2QFY22 % of Loans % of Loans
loans (%) (%)
ICICIBC (Incl. BB & Below) 16.2 2.1 4.8 (0.3) 1.0 (0.2) 80 1.3 3.3 1.0
AXSB (Incl. BB & Below) 15.8 1.7 3.5 (0.3) 1.1 (0.1) 70 0.9 3.9 1.5
IIB (Incl. Vodafone) 15.4 2.1 2.8 (0.1) 0.8 (0.0) 72 3.6 4.9 1.6
Bandhan (Incl. MFI SMA 1+2) 19.4 2.5 10.8 2.6 3.0 (0.3) 74 11.2 12.4 8.1
ICICIBC 16.2 2.1 4.8 (0.3) 1.0 (0.2) 80 1.3 3.3 1.0
AXSB 15.8 1.7 3.5 (0.3) 1.1 (0.1) 70 0.9 3.9 1.5
HDFCB 17.4 2.8 1.4 (0.1) 0.4 (0.1) 71 1.7 2.1 1.2
KMB 20.8 5.2 3.2 (0.4) 1.1 (0.2) 67 0.5 2.4 1.2
IIB 15.4 2.1 2.8 (0.1) 0.8 (0.0) 72 3.6 4.9 1.6
RBL 15.5 2.6 5.4 0.4 2.1 0.1 62 3.4 9.1 6.5
Bandhan 19.4 2.5 10.8 2.6 3.0 (0.3) 74 11.2 12.4 8.1
Yes 11.5 1.9 15.0 (0.6) 5.6 (0.2) 67 3.6 4.6 0.9
FB 14.1 2.2 3.2 (0.3) 1.1 (0.1) 66 2.6 1.5 0.6
CUBK 18.2 5.2 5.6 (0.0) 3.5 (0.0) 39 6.1 4.2 3.1
KVB 16.8 4.1 7.4 (0.6) 3.0 (0.7) 61 3.1 2.7 0.8
AU SFB 20.5 2.5 3.2 (1.2) 1.7 (0.6) 49 3.6 2.5 1.1
EquitasSFB 21.0 - 4.8 0.1 2.5 0.1 50 9.7 8.0 3.0
DCB 15.3 3.8 4.7 (0.2) 2.6 (0.2) 45 7.8 7.0 2.1
SIB 11.7 4.8 6.7 (1.4) 3.9 (1.2) 44 4.1 5.0 2.8
SBIN 9.8 1.1 4.9 (0.4) 1.5 (0.3) 70 1.6 1.7 0.7
Indian 11.7 1.7 9.6 (0.1) 3.3 (0.2) 68 6.3 4.6 1.9
BOB 11.4 1.2 8.1 (0.8) 2.8 (0.2) 67 3.0 3.5 0.8
CBK 10.1 1.7 8.4 (0.1) 3.2 (0.3) 64 3.0 3.5 0.5
PNB 11.6 1.9 13.6 (0.7) 5.5 (0.4) 63 3.1 5.7 0.5
BOI 13.4 1.5 12.0 (1.5) 2.8 (0.6) 79 6.1 2.8 (0.6)
UNBK 10.2 1.8 12.6 (1.0) 4.6 (0.1) 67 4.1 4.7 2.0
Source: B&K Research. Note: We have used certain assumptions for certain fields. Select banks have not given Covid-19 provisions separately and hence
such provisions are subsumed in Contingent Provisions. ECLGS is kept as unchanged QoQ for select banks. Total Provisions on Total stress is All Specific and
Non-Specific provisions (incl. GP) divided by reported GNPAs+ RSA.
22
Bank-wise Asset Quality Snapshot
Bank-wise asset quality snapshot: Gross stress, total PCR and Net stress
Total Gross Stress Total Non- Total Provisions = Specific
Total PCR on Covid-19
(GNPAs + RSA) - Specific Prov. + Contingent Prov Net Stress Book
Total stress Provision
2QFY22 Provision (Incl. GP) Includes Covid-19
Banks
% of % of
% of NW % % % % of Loans % of NW % of NW
Loans Loans
ICICIBC (Incl. BB & Below) 8.5 42 74 0.8 2.0 6.3 31 2.2 11
AXSB (Incl. BB & Below) 6.7 39 72 0.8 2.1 4.8 28 1.9 11
IIB (Incl. Vodafone) 7.9 39 49 0.3 1.9 3.9 19 4.0 20
Bandhan (Incl. MFI SMA 1+2) 29.9 152 43 - 4.1 12.8 65 17.1 87
24
Systemic growth has bottomed-out
Telecom and Power have seen turnaround; Trend reversals in NBFCs should drive healthy delta
We see systemic growth rising to 12-13% YoY by FY23E, w/w, Private could grow at 15-18% YoY
ICICI retains the pole position followed by HDFCB. +ve surprise from KMB but -ve from Axis
De-leveraging continues though turnaround for Power / Telecom & trend reversal for NBFCs
YoY Growth (%)
Share in Total
Sector
Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Oct-21 Credit (%)
Textiles 0.4 (0.2) 0.2 1.0 10.2 8.0 4.7 7.7 8.2 7.2 6.9 6.5 6.3 7.0 2.0
Basic Metal & Metal Products (4.1) (4.7) (4.0) (2.4) (2.1) (1.1) (6.1) (12.0) (13.2) (14.6) (13.5) (14.7) (15.9) (16.3) 2.9
Cement & Cement Products (4.2) (4.6) (2.2) (2.6) (0.3) 1.8 (10.1) (14.7) (13.2) (12.1) (21.4) (19.9) (20.8) (21.5) 0.5
Power (1.6) (2.0) (2.0) (1.5) (0.3) 2.6 1.2 0.0 (1.5) (0.9) 0.0 3.1 4.0 6.1 5.9
TeleCommunications 2.8 (14.3) (20.9) (26.6) (36.8) (36.3) (21.0) (17.6) (17.6) (20.5) (13.5) (11.8) (3.6) 4.3 1.1
Roads 12.9 13.6 8.1 8.4 1.4 8.0 33.1 35.5 29.8 28.1 29.7 29.3 24.8 23.5 2.5
CmRE 5.7 3.2 5.6 5.1 2.8 1.6 1.3 2.2 2.6 1.3 0.1 (1.0) (0.2) (0.5) 2.6
NBFC 9.8 7.0 7.8 8.4 20.2 9.2 0.2 3.4 2.2 (2.2) 0.5 (2.5) (2.5) 1.4 9.0
Kotak delivered highest mortgage growth; Healthy QoQ growth in Unsecured across banks
Strong SA growth at IIB (off low base) while ICICI / HDFCB remain steady. Deceleration for KMB
NIMs healthy QoQ on negligible Net slippages. ICICI NII growth at 25% YoY, 2x peer banks
NIMs have strong +ve co-relation with Interest rates. Share of Repo-linked loans is rising swiftly
Source: RBI, B&K Research. *WADTDR is Weighted Average Domestic Term Deposit Rates. **WALR is Weighted Average Lending Rates . ^Spread is WADTDR - WALR.
Lending spreads are rising while low LDRs provide another trigger for NIMs expansion
36
Digital landscape evolving; SME / small-ticket high-
volume loans likely to see paradigm shift
India is one of the hottest Fin-tech markets driven by strong underlying drivers. India has strong digital infrastructures, deep
under-penetrated financial services, higher cost of physical services, young demographics, tech-savvy users and reasonably
flexible regulators.
Retail Payment space has been clearly dominated by Fin-techs. Google Pay, PhonePe, PayTM control over 90% UPI m/s.
Fin-techs have got capital and customers, can attract talent and have reasonable flexibility. However, lending is NOT an easy
skill to master, especially in collection. Regulations are still evolving and big unknown.
Fin-techs have adopted collaborative approach so far. Not much instances of head-on competition seen in lending yet. Fin-
techs are still focused on non-lending revenue sources. They could be big disruptor in case they get the lending mechanism
right.
At system level, ‘Other income’ is 1/3rd of net revenue, it becomes ~60% of adjusted for provisions Net revenue. However, a large
part of Other income is clearly lending / liability linked and hence less at risks. TPD income at system levels would be limited at
Rs 100 bn only.
Account Aggregator and Open Credit Enablement Network (OCEN) could lead to paradigm shift in Retail / SME lending.
While P2M / P2P, may not be remunerative, there is clear opportunity for Merchant lending. All banks have thrown their hats in
the ring. HDFCB aims to grow 10x in this over the next 3-5 years. Globally, commerce enablement appears to be the next
frontier for Fin-techs. SME focused banks may face revenue / growth issues.
Small ticket lending is likely to explode due to exponential digitization of small payment (UPI QR codes) and as Fin-techs test
their lending mechanisms. Just like UPI and new age broking, we believe it should expand the overall market .
Fin-tech competition could have multiple facets. Fin-tech + Bank combo could be game changer.
Regulations are still evolving and intent seems pro-consumer and thus could disrupt the business models for Fin-techs.
Regulation is clearly the ‘elephant in the room’. RBI WG effectively prescribes lending by only Regulated entities and effective
ban on FLDG structure.
We see some merits in NITI Aayog proposals for Digital bank for Fin-techs which would solve the financial inclusion while
maintaining systemic risks and providing reasonable maneuverability for the Fin-techs.
Within incumbents, we see ICICI bank at the forefront of digital capabilities. HDFCB is yet to get the full clearance for Digital
activities. Axis / KMB / IIB etc. also seems to be stepping-up. Within PSUs, SBI is strong while Non-SBI PSU banks are behind-the-
curve. Within smaller banks, Federal bank appears very active in Fin-tech / digital adoption.
37
India STACK
Digital channels now account for >85-90% of retail payment pie by value and volume
39
Exponential growth in UPI; ticket size also rising
UPI transaction growth is exponential; Value is 3.5x of combined debit and credit cards
UPI has cornered over 35% market share in overall. Rising ticket size suggesting of rising comfort
PhonePe, Google Pay and PayTM dominate the UPI payment space
AA / OCEN could address the fundamental issues for under-penetration of SME financing
• Fin-tech now have strong capital base and capital availability and thus attracting Talent is also not much issue.
• However, lending is NOT an easy skills to master especially in the area of collection. We have seen the credit costs for select
products have gone through the roof especially amidst Covid-19.
• We have seen exponentially higher credit costs for select Fin-techs especially on BNPL.
• Recent RBI Working Group report has proposed to keep lending restricted to Regulated entities. It also talks about
disallowing FLDG (Fixed loss default guarantee) and any synthetic lending structure.
Source: Company Data, B&K Research, Note: *Monthly active users. **Monthly transacting users.
43
Collaborative approach so far….focusing on fee income
• Fin-techs have adopted collaborative approach so far. Most of them are focused on better UI / UX and solving one set of
problems.
• Not much instances of head-on competition seen in lending yet. Majority of the focus is on better customer engagement
to drive non-lending revenue. The partnership for select Fin-techs and banks is also mostly non-exclusive.
• For FY20, systemic NII stood at Rs 4.9 trn and Other income was Rs 2.3 trn making total net revenue at Rs 7.3 trn. NII share is
67%. However, there are huge provisioning costs which are predominantly associated with lending. We deduct the
provisioning from NII to arrive at Adjusted NII at Rs 1.7 trn. Thus, the share of Adj NII in adjusted Net revenue reduces to just
42%.
• In a way, Other income accounts for 33% of revenue but 58% of adjusted revenue.
• Within Other income, the share of CEB / Forex / Misc is ~Rs 2.0 trillion. We believe a large part is linked to liability, lending, and
businesses and hence broadly insulated from Fin-techs. The total TPD income pool for the system would be ~Rs 100 bn only,
which could be at risk.
Other income is ~33% of net revenue and ~58% of Adj net revenue. TPD income est. at ~Rs100bn.
Source: BCG
Source: BCG
45
Small-ticket lending will explode
• Globally, there is a surge in small-ticket high volume Exponential growth expected in BNPL
lending or BNPL (Buy Now Pay Later) type transactions.
This is possible as Cost of acquisition / Servicing /
monitoring has come down dramatically.
POS has been stagnant while UPI QR codes have exploded. Digital trail for small payments as well
Source: BCG
46
An almost re-play of what happened in payments
Fin-techs could revolutionize the small ticket lending pie just the way UPI did to payments
Source: BCG
47
Commerce enablement is the new frontier
• All banks have thrown their hats in the ring. HDFCB has
stepped up Merchant Acceptance Points (MAP) from ~1mn
in FY19 to 2 mn in FY21 and now plans to grow 10x in the
next 3-5 years.
Explosive growth opportunity in merchants GMV. HDFCB aims 10x growth in MAP 3-5 years
50
SME and Small ticket lending could see exponential rise
• Credit penetration in Retail and MSME segment is abysmally low due to multiple structural reasons though digital could be
key enabler.
• AA / OCEN framework, given its focus on consolidated profile, at one stop along with data / information on non-financial
transactions, would help bridge the information asymmetry.
• Real time flow of data, rising digital print, involvement of Loan Service Providers, Open architecture, should lower customer
acquisition, monitoring costs, TAT, and help scale the volumes.
• Good experience for customers and lenders alike would also start a virtuous cycle and strong network effect.
• Apart from the current unmet demand, AA / OCEN framework could also potentially unlock New Use Cases using
appropriately sourced, sized, priced and timed credit products.
• Rising digitization of payment (QR codes vs cash) should enable lenders comfort and a explosive growth.
AA / OCEN and rising SME digital foot-print could bridge the massive credit gap.
51
…may be similar to what happened in Broking
New age broking dramatically expanded the pie driven by multiple reasons including customer
convenience. We argue similar explosion in Small ticket lending pie is possible.
52
SME lending recent trends in India
O/s SME lending growth muted. However, disbursements have risen due to ECLGS
Some dip in rating profile of SME post Covid. Transition matrix shows both side movements
Almost the entire m/s gains at ICICIBC credit cards have come from Amazon co-branded card
55
Regulations could disrupt Fin-Techs!! Elephant in the
room
• RBI has released its working group report discussing proposed framework for Digital lending in India. While this is draft
report and hence the recommendation are not final yet, it nonetheless gives the broad thought process on the entire
digital lending landscape.
• Interestingly, RBI believes that protection of financial consumer’s interest would always weigh heavier than the interest of
innovation.
• The report talks about self-regulation (SRO) framework of the digital lending and intends to address Regulatory arbitrage.
Overall, the report appears to be a well thought out attempt to provide a regulatory framework for Fin-techs, which in a
way can limit the flexibility of Fin-techs (though should not stifle the innovation).
• 3 key principles: A) Technology Neutrality: Neutrality towards technological differentials or business models while
encouraging competition to maximize the benefits to the financial system. B) Principle Backed Regulation: Instead of a
rule-based regime, a principle-backed approach to provide sufficient scope for innovation and adaptability in a dynamic
environment. C) Addressing Regulatory Arbitrage: Addressing the arbitrage between different sets of entities in the digital
lending ecosystem to ensure level playing field and market integrity. The same regulatory conditions and supervision
should apply to all actors who seek to innovate and compete on FinTech: incumbent banks, FinTech start-ups and BigTech
firms.
• Balance sheet lending through DLAs restricted to entities regulated and authorized by RBI. Prohibiting REs from entering into
arrangements involving synthetic structures (FLDG) with unregulated entities. Separate legislation to prevent illegal digital
lending.
• A Self-Regulatory Organization (SRO) should be constituted covering the participants in the digital lending ecosystem
• Compliance with the prescribed baseline technology standards. Data should be stored in servers located in India.
• Each lender should provide a key fact statement in a standardized format. Data collection with prior and explicit consent of
borrowers with verifiable audit trails.
• Standardized code of conduct for recovery to be framed by the proposed SRO in consultation with RBI.
• Reporting of lending done by REs through DLAs to credit bureaus. Penal actions by the RBI if credit reporting not adhered.
56
NITI Aayog pitches for Digital Bank
• Reserve Bank seems to be agreeing with varied degree of regulation of a financial entity commensurate with the risk the
entity poses to the financial system. This approach has been advocated in the circular on ‘Scale Based Supervision’.
• The WG also suggests Regulations for the operations of so-called ‘digital banks’/ ‘neo banks’ formulation. Encouragement
for ‘digital only’ NBFCs and initiation of digital only banks.
• While regulatory innovation has catalysed payments sector reforms the principal beast of burden for credit delivery and
issuance of demand deposits, i.e. the incumbent bank has remained undisrupted. Most of these reforms upended the user
experience, i.e. the engagement layer of payments but making little improvement in the core utility banking layer.
• Partly flowing from that inertia, the country still has large segments who have not befitted from this digital revolution
• Since the informal debt is not visible in the credit bureaus, lenders exercise rational apathy towards funding the MSME
segment. In other words, the costs of due diligence that a bank will incur towards evaluating the credit risk adjusted against
the ticket-size and the yield from the loan make it unviable.
• So, even in cases where the bank may otherwise be willing to fund a prospect, the adjacent documentation cannot be
produced readily. In such cases, it is trite that the MSE owner will rationally opt-out and prefer the informal markets with
their light-touch processes. Thus there is both demand-side and supply-side friction that results in “market failure” in the
formal MSME debt markets.
• Creating a new licensing / regulatory framework (for Digital Bank) is being proposed as regulatory innovation and not as
regulatory arbitrage. Having said that, Digital Bank offers a differentiated proposition and as such, there is scope for
differentiated treatment in adjacent areas of their operation while treating them identical with incumbent commercial
banks in the critical areas of prudential and liquidity risk.
57
Theme 1: Asset Quality: Covid-19 stress largely
01 over; Start of benign credit costs cycle
58
Banks’ Pecking Order
Key Themes and Banks’ Pecking Order
Asset Quality: Asset Quality outcomes have been better and credit costs have already peaked. MFI slippages / credit costs to
be elevated in 2HFY22. But overall, there could be the beginning of multi-year benign credit costs cycle. ECLGS would be tested
in 3QFY22 but do not see much risks as yet.
Growth: Growth is an issue but has already bottomed out. Large banks well placed and getting aggressive on Commercial
segment and thus we see headwinds for Regional banks. We estimate overall systemic growth to rise to 12-13% YoY by FY23E.
Fin-Tech disruption: See collaborative approach vs competitive approach by Fin-techs; Big disruption if Fin-techs can get the
lending right. RBI WG has proposed strict guidelines for lending by Fin-techs. See most action in SME / small-ticket high volume
retail lending. Commerce enablement could be the new frontier. While this along with AA / OCEN should enlarge the entire SME
pie but potential headwinds for SME focused banks.
Large banks are well placed on Asset Quality, Growth, NIMs, CASA Capital and Digital preparedness.
Mid-size banks still fine-tuning select part of their businesses. SME lending could see transformation changes.
PSU banks - Asset Quality cycle turning is huge cyclical +ve for PSBs though Core PPOP is still weak at <2%.
Top Picks: ICICI, HDFCB and SBI. Kotak is key U/W. Positive Risk rewards for Axis and IIB. See strong case for HDFCB vs KMB.
59
Large Banks better placed (1/4)
Large Banks are better placed on Growth, Capital, CoD, Large banks better placed on growth
CASA, Asset quality, and have an edge on Loan mix.
Large banks also have all time high CET 1 levels and strong
digital capabilities.
Covid-19).
Large banks continue to have edge on CoD, CASA and Retail / granular deposits
Source: Company Data, B&K Research. Note: Share of Retail Deposits for SBI and CUBK is as on 4QFY21.
60
Large Banks better placed (2/4)
Mid-size Private banks are niche lenders. Large Private have healthy and rising PPoP
Capital Position across banks is very strong more so for large private banks
Source: Company Data, B&K Research. Note: ICICI and Axis figures are including o/s BB and Below portfolio
Large banks have strong non-PCR buffer. Total PCR is strong at >70% for large banks; IIB at ~50%
Source: Company Data, B&K Research. Note: ICICI and Axis figures includes BB and below book while IIB figures include stressed Telecom exposure
62
RoAs to see healthy expansion
ICICI Bank is the second largest private bank in India. The bank has strong presence across entire gamut of financial services
including Insurance, AMC, Broking, Capital Markets, AIF etc. Mr. Sandeep Bakhshi has been the MD&CEO since October 2018.
Investment rationale
• Emerged as growth leader led by strong retail growth: Retail has been the key growth driver with ~20% CAGR from FY15-
FY21; share of retail loans have increased to 62% from 40% over the past few years. Within retail, growth has been driven by
mortgages and unsecured loans (off low base). Wholesale lending has been completely overhauled with strict focus on
highly rated, granular and transactional exposure and de-focus on risky project, M&A and non-India linked overseas book.
Despite Covid-19, the bank has emerged as a new growth leader across banks at >17% for past couple of quarters.
• Core PPoP growth steady at >15%: NIMs have been broadly steady over the past few years, aided by change in loan mix.
Fee profile has remained strong and granular in nature and extensive digital franchise. Very importantly, we believe the
bank has shown strong execution in pursuing profitable growth with Core Operating profits growth at ≥15% consistently for
11th consecutive quarters.
• Covid-19 stress has peaked; Credit costs to normalize swiftly: Asset quality has improved significantly over the past few
years led by aggressive clean-up of legacy stress and prudent underwriting. Despite Covid-19, net slippages are well under
control with 2QFY22 net slippages negligible at 0.1%. Net NPAs are low at <1% and Restructured loans are also contained at
1.3%. The bank has also built strong contingent buffer at ~2%. ‘BB and below’ book has been credit tested and O/s has come
down to <2%. We expects credit cost to normalize by FY23E.
• Fast evolving as full-stack digital bank: The bank has been fast evolving into full-stack digital bank with several industry
leading offerings and end-to-end digital solutions. The bank is leveraging digital capability as the force multiplier in all
aspects and has product-agnostic but customer-centric solutions approach; thus is all set to ride the digital boom, in our
view. We see the strong digital capability as a structural business moat encompassing customer acquisition, growth,
efficiency, risk management and profitability.
The bank is likely to further cement its position of growth leadership in coming quarters driven by superior liability mix and
strong digital capabilities. The bank has managed Covid-19 very well with the un-provided stress book (including BB and
below book) at ~2% of loans and ~11% of Net-worth. We estimate decade high RoAs / RoEs at 1.9 /16.0% respectively for FY23-
24E. Valuations at ~2.1x FY23 core banking ABV are attractive. Maintain Buy with Target Price at Rs 950 (valuing the core
bank at 3.0x). ICICI bank is the top banking idea.
64
ICICI Bank: Growth / Digital leadership with decade high
expected RoAs
ICICI is the growth leader now. Core PPoP growth strong at ≥15% for 11th consecutive quarter
Decade high RoAs / RoEs at 1.9/16% by FY23E driven by steady PPoP and easing Credit costs
HDFC Bank is the largest Indian bank by market cap and the largest private banks by assets. The bank has almost impeccable
track record of delivering > 20% PAT growth over the last 20 years. The bank is the market leader in Personal loans, Credit Card,
Auto Loans and hence a key proxy for rising consumerism in India. Mr. Sashi Jagdishan succeeded Mr Aditya Puri as MD&CEO in
October 2020.
Investment rationale
• Strong growth stance; NII growth has bottomed-out: HFC Bank has the largest distribution, diversified product portfolio,
and strong working capital loan proposition, enabling it to toggle retail or wholesale loans depending on the opportunities.
During Covid-19, the bank focused more on top rate wholesale book and Sovereign exposures, thus NII came under a bit of
pressure. Retail growth has now stepped-up from below system levels to 13% YoY in 2QFY22. The new MD&CEO aims to
double the commercial book (~33% of the overall loans) in next 2 years. With healthy retail / commercial / credit card
growth, we believe that NII growth has already bottomed-out in 1QFY22 (9% YoY; 2QFY22 at 12% YoY) and should sustain its
upward journey along with NIMs uptick.
• Credit card ban lifted; Digital / Fin-tech capabilities hiked; PayTM tie-up in place: The bank has stepped-up its digital
capabilities with a) UPI capacity has been tripled and; b) Net banking and Mobile banking capacity has been doubled.
Overall, the bank is confident of handling potential load for the next 3-5 years!!. Since the lifting of new credit card
issuance ban in August 2021, bank has started to re-coup its lost m/s. The non-exclusive tie-up with PayTM for credit cards
with special focus on millennials, business owners and merchant should fuel quality customer acquisition and sustainable
revenue stream.
• Impeccable asset quality despite Covid-19 shock: Despite carrying highest share of unsecured personal loans, the bank
has maintained the best asset quality in Indian financial sector across asset quality cycles driven by strong risk
management practices, strong monitoring and prudent customer selection. Despite Covid-19 disruption, the total net
stressed book is contained at just <1%. The bank has the history of creating prudential provisioning (even higher than
reported net NPAs).
• Valuations attractive with overhangs behind and strong >2% RoAs and >17% CET 1: We expect healthy loan growth driven
by Commercial and Retail segment (vs corporate grwoth) over FY22-24E. Resumption of credit card should also lead to NII
growth. We expect the bank to deliver ~20% PAT CAGR (FY22-24E) leading to amongst highest ~2.1% RoAs and 18% RoEs.
Most of the overhangs surrounding the stock have either receded or should recede over the next 1-2 quarters with retail /
commercial growth rising, NII growth picking-up and digital capabilities firming-up. The bank can actually surprise on
growth as well as NIMs given their historical track record. We find valuations at ~3x FY23E ABV and 18x FY23 EPS, very
attractive and maintain Buy with unrevised TP at Rs 2,000.
66
HDFCB
NII growth has bottomed-out while resumption of Credit card should aid NII / NIMs expansion.
Valuations are attractive with stock trading at ~3.0x FY21 ABV with RoEs improving further to ~18%.
• Kotak has unparalleled conservativism, seen strong CASA, growth uptick, has amongst lowest CoF, and hence embedded
optionality.
• However, Cyclical changes in Asset quality, limited tenure of MD&CEO and NII/ growth trade-off could blunt the above
edges.
• Negatively surprised by huge ECLGS share at Kotak. Outsized ECLGS has implications on a) AQ; b) Growth and c) Franchise
22% of the total loans at Kotak bank are SME / Self-employed / LAP etc. where asset quality uncertainty would remain till
FY23E. HDFCB has only 10% loans linked under ECLGS.
ECLGS can be argued to be a growth drag as banks may not want to push growth here.
• CASA share is the highest at Kotak but is boosted by muted TD. HDFCB is delivering higher SA growth than KMB on >3x base.
• While Kotak has strong CoF edge (lowest across all banks), it may not translate too much into growth. The focus is on
secured products such as Home loans and SME. Lower CoF, is necessary but not sufficient condition for Home loan growth.
It should be accompanied by a) feet on street; b) Builder tie-up and c) large pool of Corporate Salaried customers.
• HDFCB – Management succession has been largely smooth. Key investors’ concern – a) weak NII growth and b) Digital
preparedness – seem to have largely addressed. We believe NII growth has already bottomed-out for HDFCB.
• KMB saw a sharp moderation in NII in 2QFY22. Also, management transition could lead to time de-rating as seen in HDFCB.
• Valuations: Both Have similar RoAs but ROE differential is too much to ignore. HDFCB would have 17-0-18% ROE vs 12-13% for
KMB. ABV CAGR for FY21-23 is 16% for HDFCB vs 12-13% for KMB.
• At standardized 4x FY23E ABV, the upside for HDFCB would be ~30% vs just 5% for KMB. Prefer HDFCB over KMB.
68
HDFCB vs KMB (2/4)
Sharp divergence in growth trajectory for both banks. Sharp divergence in NII as well
HDFCB is generating much superior CASA growth despite 2-3x higher base
69
HDFCB vs KMB (3/4)
KMB has outperformed HDFCB recently on later digital issues We see the reversals of recent outperformance
and weak NII growth.
Asset Quality: Both are quality banks though HDFCB fared a bit better
70
Oversized ECLGS – Multiple implications (4/4)
ECLGS Pro-portion outsized for Kotak – Multiple implications
• We are negatively surprised by the outsized ECLGS disbursements at Kotak. ECLGS disbursement should be multiplied by 5x
so as to get the impacted book. Kotak has 22-23% of loans vs 10% for HDFCB / Sector
• Till 1QFY21, KMB acknowledged some sort of stress in these accounts though in 2QFY22, the bank believes that there is no
material difference in the riskiness of ECLGS vs rest.
• Clearly, 22% of the total loans at Kotak are SME / Self-employed / LAP etc. where asset quality uncertainty would remain till
FY23E. ECLGS can be argued to be a growth drag as banks may not want to push growth though KMB commentary has
changed a bit here.
• Despite strong liability build-up, it appears that share of Corporate Salaried customers are much less at Kotak.
71
State Bank of India Maintain BUY
Best-in-class Asset Quality; Profitability to rise even further. Growth revival to lead to sharp re-rating
State Bank of India (SBI) is the largest bank in India with around 25% market share in loans and deposits. The bank serves over
440 mn customers through the largest network of 22,000+ branches. It is also the holding company for SBI Credit Card, Life /
General Insurance, MF and Capital Market intermediaries. Mr. Dinesh Khara was appointed as Chairman in October 2020 for 3
years.
• Overall growth soft but retail healthy: Unlike other PSU banks which have consistently ceded market share, SBI despite it
having ~23-25% m/s, has largely maintained its m/s. Considering huge m/s, overall growth is likely to mimic systemic
growth. Importantly, the bank has continued strong growth in retail portfolio led by Unsecured Personal loans (X-Press
credit, mainly to PSU employee) and Home loans. Within 3-4 years, the bank has built the largest Unsecured PL book with
industry best NPAs, which have been tested in Covid as well. We expect the strong retail growth to sustain for the bank.
• Strong liability franchise; NIMs healthy: The bank has strong liability franchise driven by brand, trust and outreach. The
bank has around 25% market share in systemic deposits and is the price setter in the Industry. CASA share has been strong
at ~45%. 2QFY22 saw sharp NIMs uptick (up 32 bps QoQ) to 3.24% and should get a boost going ahead from rising LDR /
growth and lower NPAs drag.
• Expect multi-years high RoA / RoEs; CET 1 healthy: The bank has absorbed the full family pension hit in 2QFY22 and despite
that reported 66 bps RoAs aided by miniscule credit costs. We expect the bank to report multi-year high RoAs at ~0.85% for
both FY23/24E with RoEs improving to ~15%, led by steady operating earnings and easing credit costs normalization. CET 1
remains healthy at ~10%.
• Asset Quality Super Cycle has ended; Covid-19 stress manageable: Over the last few quarters, asset quality performance
has been amongst best-in-Industry. Despite covid-19 led disruptions, annualized slippages for FY21 / 1HFY22 were contained
at 1.3% / 1.7% of loans though the bank does inter-quarter netting off. Net slippages for 2QFY22 were negative. Overall GNPAs
is now at 4.9% with 70% PCR resulting in Net NPAs at just 1.52%. We model-in 1.8/1.7/1.5% slippages for FY22/23/24E, which along
with stable PCR should translate to Credit costs moderating to <100 bps by FY23E. The bank is key beneficiary of rising NPA
resolution as well.
SBI stands out across all PSBs due to its dominant presence, management depth, strong deposits and retail franchise, and
contribution from Subs. Amidst Covid-19 disruption, the bank has managed asset quality even better than some of the
large private peers. NNPAs (1.5%), RSA (1.6%), and SMA 1+2 (27 bps) are very manageable. While the bank has reported
highest ever PAT, we see further rise in profitability going ahead. Overall, we believe the bank stands well positioned for
multi-years high RoAs with upside risks from higher-than-expected growth and NIMs. Overall risk returns remain
attractive with stock trading at ~0.9x FY23 Core banking book.
72
SBI: Strong Retail growth; Net stress benign
SBIN has continued strong retail growth led by Housing and Unsecured while Corporate is muted
Axis bank is the third largest private sector bank with assets size of Rs 9.4 trillion. The bank has a large footprint of 4,500+
branches and 12,000+ ATMs spread across the country. Mr. Amitabh Chaudhary (ex-HDFC Life) was appointed as MD&CEO in
January 2019.
Investment rationale
• Healthy growth led by Retail; Strong liability: Loan growth has been strong with 15% CAGR (FY15-21), led by retail loans
(~20% CAGR). Share of retail increased from 40% in FY15 to 56% in 2QFY22. Positively, covid-19 led disruptions seem to be over
as retail disbursements have seen sharp rebound, though muted corporate growth remains a drag. Liability profile is solid
with CASA at 45% and Retail deposits + CASA at 84%.
• NIMs to rise although gradually; needs to work on steady Core PPOP: NIMs have held up well supported by easing cost of
deposits, rising mix of retail loans and spread management. We believe strong CASA, utilization of excess liquidity,
favorable loan mix, contained interest reversals and receding RIDF drag (6-8% of loan book) should drive gradual NIMs
expansion going ahead. Core PPOP growth has been volatile and the bank needs to work on this metrices, in our view, We
expect ~15% CAGR for FY22-24E.
• Managed Covid-19 well; Asset quality outlook positive: The asset quality super cycle, which started in FY16, has ended.
The bank has managed Covid-19 phase very well with net NPAs at ~1.1% and amongst lowest restructured loans at <1%. Gross
slippages have been driven by retail, primarily coming from unsecured book but have low tail risk. Moreover, BBB book has
become much granular with ATS at <Rs 1 bn and BB and below book subsumes almost entire wholesale restructured loans
and stands reduced at <2%. We expect sharp improvement in Gross and Net NPAs by FY23/24E.
• Stepped-up on prudence; PCR strong: The bank has stepped-up on prudence on almost every aspect in terms of Interest
recognition, fee amortization, up-fronting stress, building-up contingency reserves, opex, etc. The bank has strong PCR at
~70% and also carries >2% of non-specific provisions, amongst highest across banks.
• Sharp expansion in RoA / RoEs to 1.5/15.0%; CET 1 strong: We expect healthy top-line growth along with moderation in
credit costs should drive sharp ROAs expansion from 0.7% in FY21 to 1.5% by FY23-24. RoEs are expected at 15-16% by FY23-
24EE.
While the standalone performance of Axis bank has been reasonable, it continues to lag behind its peers on growth, NIMs,
core –operating earnings growth and in-part on asset quality as well. Positively, the bank has amongst lowest restructured
loans and has amongst highest non-PCR buffer at >200 bps. Overall, risks rewards remain attractive with stock trading at
1.5/1.3x FY23/23E ABV. Maintain Buy. Key monitorable would be the acquisition of high-yielding Portfolio or business (MFI or
Citi portfolio).
74
Axis Bank: RoAs / RoEs expansion to drive re-rating
Core PPOP has been volatile and needs to be worked upon. We see sharp moderation in credit costs
RoAs / RoEs to expand sharply to 1.5/ 15.0% (still lower than ICICI) by FY23E, driving re-rating.
• We maintain SBI and BoB as our Top picks. We see 33-45% upside for these names. We highlight that Canara bank has
stepped-up on Core PPOP (amongst highest across PSU) and have amongst lowest SMA book. We maintain Buy on Canara
Bank.
• We are bit disappointed with amongst highest o/s RSA book at Indian bank. PNB and Union have the highest Net NPAs and
weak core earnings; thus RoAs progression is likely to be much slower for them.
SBI continues to remain the most preferred PSU Bank; Ex-SBI, we prefer BOB and Canara
PSU Comparison SBIN Indian BOB Canara PNB BOI Union
Asset Quality SBIN Indian BOB Canara PNB BOI Union
Gross Slippages (%;annualized) 0.7 4.4 3.3 4.2 5.4 1.4 4.6
Net Slippages (%;annualized) (0.5) 1.6 1.0 0.8 (0.0) (2.3) 2.2
Gross NPAs (%) 4.9 9.6 8.1 8.4 13.6 12.0 12.6
Net NPAs (%) 1.5 3.3 2.8 3.2 5.5 2.8 4.6
PCR on GNPAs (%) 70 68 67 64 63 79 67
RSA (Rs Bn) 383 226 205 193 209 231 239
RSA (%) 1.6 6.3 3.0 3.0 3.1 6.1 4.1
Net Stress (Rs Bn) 476 304 345 353 528 301 462
% of Loans 1.9 8.4 5.0 5.4 7.8 8.0 8.0
% of Networth 17.7 71.9 42.8 55.3 55.2 56.8 66.4
Business and Capital SBIN Indian BOB Canara PNB BOI Union
Net Advances (Rs Bn) 24,432 3,604 6,938 6,496 6,732 3,787 5,810
CASA (%) 45 41 42 32 45 38 37
NIMs (%) 3.2 2.9 2.9 2.7 2.4 2.4 3.0
PPoP / Assets % (annualized)* 1.5 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.3 1.5 2.3
PPoP less treasury / Assets % (annualized)* 1.5 1.8 1.5 1.5 0.9 1.3 2.0
PPoP less treasury less recovery from TWO 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.5 0.6 1.1 1.3
• Positively, Net slippages have been under control across banks and in-fact, negative for Federal and Karur Vysya Bank
• Restructured loans are relatively on the higher side and varies across banks at ~3-10%.
• Bandhan has the highest RSA at ~11%, followed by EquitasB at ~10%. Federal Bank has the lowest net stress at 3%.
• RBL bank (not covered) also seems to be factoring-in most of the negatives.
• We prefer EquitasB from medium term perspective. We also like Federal bank and KVB from risk returns perspective.
Gross NPA % 3.2 5.6 4.7 6.7 7.4 4.8 5.4 10.8
Net NPA % 1.1 3.5 2.6 3.9 3.0 2.5 2.1 3.0
PCR % 66 39 45 44 61 50 62 74
O/s RSA (Rs Bn) 35,360 22,478 18,270 23,100 15,790 17,250 18,763 83,260
as % of Loans 2.6 6.1 6.8 4.1 3.1 9.7 3.4 11.2
Total Stress (GNPA + O/s RSA; Rs Bn) 79,818 43,671 31,119 61,896 55,506 26,058 50,072 170,896
% of Loans 5.9 11.8 11.6 10.9 10.8 14.6 8.9 22.9
% of Networth 45 71 81 110 77 75 41 117
Net Stress (Rs Bn) 39,836 31,214 20,830 40,025 27,313 18,444 24,187 75,696
% of Loans 3.0 8.4 7.8 7.1 5.3 10.3 4.3 10.2
% of Networth 22 51 54 71 38 53 20 52
Source: Company Data, B&K Research
77
RBL Bank (Not covered)
• RBL bank is mid-size bank but NOT SME / Commercial Better than peer performance in MFI segment
bank.
RBL has shown the most restraint in MFI lending during Covid; AQ performance relatively better
78
RBL Bank (Not covered)
YoY Growth (in % ) Mar-20 Jun-20 Sep-20 Dec-20 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Oct-21
Gross Bank Credit (Food + Non Food Credit) 6.8 6.9 5.8 5.9 18.2 18.7 18.9 18.7 19.3 19.6 19.3 19.9
Food Credit 24.4 25.0 10.5 9.4 18.7 11.2 14.6 -2.3 -2.0 4.7 -5.8 -4.1
Non-food Credit (1 to 4) 6.7 6.7 5.8 5.9 18.2 18.7 19.0 18.9 19.4 19.7 19.5 20.1
1. Agriculture & Allied Activities 4.2 2.4 5.9 9.4 9.8 12.2 12.1 11.4 12.7 11.7 10.6 10.3
2. Industry (Micro & Small, Medium and Large ) 0.7 2.2 0.0 -1.2 -0.3 0.4 0.8 -0.3 0.1 1.5 2.0 4.2
Micro & Small 1.7 -3.7 -0.1 1.2 0.5 3.8 5.0 6.4 8.8 10.0 9.6 11.8
Medium -0.7 -9.0 14.5 15.3 28.8 43.8 45.8 54.6 60.2 58.5 45.6 46.1
Large 0.6 3.7 -0.6 -2.4 -1.7 -1.9 -1.7 -3.4 -3.8 -2.5 -1.5 0.7
3. Services 7.4 10.7 9.1 8.8 2.0 0.7 1.1 2.9 2.0 2.9 -0.2 1.1
Transport Operators 4.3 3.5 3.5 10.4 -7.3 -3.2 -4.7 -3.8 -11.0 -11.3 -11.1 -11.5
Tourism, Hotels & Restaurants 17.9 16.8 19.7 14.5 4.4 9.9 8.2 7.3 2.1 2.7 1.0 0.2
Professional Services 3.2 3.1 2.2 -25.6 -40.6 -34.0 -34.8 -35.5 -45.0 -43.0 -43.3 -43.4
Trade 4.6 6.1 11.5 14.7 6.9 11.7 14.1 13.1 6.0 4.3 1.8 3.4
Commercial Real Estate 13.6 11.6 5.5 5.1 15.0 2.2 2.6 1.3 12.6 11.9 11.2 11.2
Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) 25.9 25.7 12.5 8.4 16.2 13.7 11.8 10.7 12.4 9.3 9.3 13.5
Other Services -8.6 1.2 7.0 15.6 -11.5 -17.3 -14.8 -4.5 -2.9 6.9 -4.2 -5.1
4. Personal Loans 15.0 10.5 9.2 9.5 11.4 12.8 12.4 11.9 12.9 13.6 13.5 13.2
Consumer Durables 47.6 53.3 22.3 30.1 -5.2 -18.4 -19.0 -19.8 4.4 13.3 63.7 69.0
Housing (Including Priority Sector Housing) 15.4 12.5 8.5 8.1 8.9 9.8 10.0 9.6 8.8 8.9 8.7 8.2
Credit Card Outstanding 22.5 2.8 7.1 4.2 7.8 17.1 12.5 5.3 9.8 10.3 9.5 11.9
Vehicle Loans 9.1 7.1 8.8 7.8 21.2 11.7 11.9 11.0 22.2 22.2 22.1 21.7
Other Personal Loans 19.7 12.1 13.2 15.4 18.9 21.2 19.9 19.9 21.8 23.2 22.6 21.9
80
Annexure: Interest rate – Banks are now de-leveraged
• Hardening Interest rates have acted as headwinds for
stock performance historically due to huge AFS share and
Banks have much lower duration and AFS share
duration.
• Overall, we do not see any substantial adverse impact. Source: B&K Research
Interest rates have negative co-relation with Stock performance and +ve co-relation with NIMs
Loan Mix (%) Axis HDFCB ICICIBC IIB KMB SBIN RBL FB CUBK DCBB
Overseas 6.8 2.8 5.4 - - 14.8 - - - -
Domestic 93.2 97.2 94.6 100.0 100.0 85.2 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Corporates 27.6 23.0 23.7 22.8 27.6 29.9 34.6 35.6 9.6 11.0
SME 10.0 34.3 4.6 22.0 7.7 11.1 10.4 10.1 51.9 10.0
BuB 3.4 - 6.2 5.0 9.8 - 3.0 9.1 - -
Agri 6.6 - 9.9 - 13.9 8.5 2.2 13.0 15.7 22.0
Retail 45.6 39.9 50.2 50.1 40.9 35.7 49.8 32.2 22.7 57.0
o/w Home Loan 20.8 6.3 26.1 - 26.2 20.5 - 15.2 5.3 20.5
o/w LAP 5.9 4.5 10.7 4.0 NA - 16.4 5.8 - 20.5
o/w Mortgage 26.7 10.8 36.7 4.0 26.2 20.5 16.4 21.0 5.3 41.0
o/w PL 6.5 10.4 7.3 - 3.1 8.3 - 1.3 2.4 -
o/w CC 2.3 5.6 2.8 2.3 1.9 - 22.3 - - -
o/w Unsecured 8.7 16.0 10.1 2.3 4.9 8.3 22.3 1.3 2.4 -
o/w Auto 6.6 8.7 5.4 16.6 - 2.9 - 2.8 - -
o/w CV - - 3.4 10.2 8.3 - - - - 4.0
o/w MFI / AIB - - - 12.7 - - 10.8 - - -
o/w Retail-Others 3.7 4.4 - 5.4 4.3 1.5 4.0 0.2 7.2 15.0 12.0
Loan Book (Rs Bn) 6,217 12,104 7,204 2,208 2,350 25,308 560 1,373 380 269
Source: Company Data, B&K Research. Pls note that we have done some standardization for select banks in the above data. HDFCB has done re-grouping
of loan book in 2QFY22.
82
Annexure: SREI – Bank wise details; RBI tightens NPAs
norms
SREI and Vodafone SREI Exposure and PCR
• SREI has been recognized as NPA during 2QFY22 as court
Rs Bn SREI Exposure Provisions PCR (%)
stay was vacated.
• SBI and IDBI have made as high as 100% PCR here. Ex-SBI, SBI 27 27 100
other banks have made 40-65% PCR.
BOB 20 10 50
• No major chronic corporate case in Watch-list /
Restructured now. Vodafone stress also seems PNB 28 11 40
incrementally better
RBI tightens its norms on NPAs norms
Union 26 17 65
• RBI had mandated daily NPA tagging for all loans wef Indian 18 9 50
June 2021. This led to some spike in slippages and also
higher recovery in 1HFY22 across banks including Private Canara 32 16 50
banks.
83
Annexure: Digital Banking - Current landscape
• Overall digital disbursements across lenders have grown Digital disbursements is still nascent though
>12x over FY17-20 period to Rs 1.4 trillion. rising
• Private banks have 55% market share in overall digital
disbursements followed by NBFCs (30%) and PSBs (13%).
Private banks saw 100% CAGR in digital disbursements and have highest market share at 55%
B&K Securities is the trading name of Batlivala & Karani Securities India Pvt. Ltd.
Disclosures, applying to B&K and the Analyst (together with associates and family members)
Ownership interest in the issuer of the securities mentioned < 1%
Other financial interest in the issuer None
Other material conflict of interest None
Compensation/benefits received from issuer/3rd Parties in past 12 months:
Public offerings managed/co-managed for issuer None
Fees for merchant banking, investment banking or brokerage services (as percentage of issuer’s turnover) < 0.1%
Compensation for other services (as percentage of issuer’s turnover) < 0.1%
Analyst service as officer, director or employee of the issuer None
Involvement in market-making in the issuer’s securities None
1. B&K or its Affiliates have not recently been the beneficial owners of 1% or more of the securities mentioned in this report.
2. B&K or its Affiliates have not managed or co-managed a public offering of the securities mentioned in the report in the past 12 months.
3. B&K or its Affiliates have not received compensation for investment banking services from the issuer of these securities in the past 12 months and do not expect to
receive compensation for investment banking services from the issuer of these securities within the next three months.
4. However, one or more person of B&K or its affiliates may, from time to time, have a long or short position in any of the securities mentioned herein and may buy or
sell those securities or options thereon either on their own account or on behalf of their clients.
5. B&K or its Affiliates may, to the extent permitted by law, act upon or use the above material or the conclusions stated above or the research or analysis on which
they are based before the material is published to recipients and from time to time provide investment banking, investment management or other services for or
solicit to seek to obtain investment banking, or other securities business from, any entity referred to in this report.
6. As of the publication of this report, Enclave Capital does not make a market in the subject securities.
Important US Regulatory Disclosures on Subject Companies
Enclave Capital is the distributor of this document in the United States of America. Any US customer wishing to effect transactions in any securities referred to herein or
options thereon should do so only by contacting a representative of Enclave Capital and any transaction effected by a U.S. customer in the securities described in this
report must be effected through Enclave Capital (19 West 44th Street, suite 1700, New York, NY 10036. Tel No: (646) 454 8600).
B&K SECURITIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED.
Equity Research Division: Unit No. 1101, 1103, 1104, 11th Floor, Hallmark Business Plaza, Sant Dnyaneshwar Marg, Near Guru Nanak Hospital, Bandra East, Mumbai - 400 051, India.
Tel: +91-22-4007 6000, Fax: +91-22-2651 0024 / +91-22-2640 1520.
Registered Office: Room No. 3/4, 7 Lyons Range, Kolkata-700 001. India. Tel.: 91-33-2243 7902.
SEBI Registration No. for Batlivala & Karani Securities India Pvt. Ltd. (Research Entity) is INH300000211
B&K Research is also available on Bloomberg <BNKI>, Thomson First Call & Investext.