CASE ASSIGNMENT

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW:
CASE TITLE STUDENT ASSIGNED SUBSTITUTE
A. INTRODUCTION/GENERAL CONSIDERATION
1. Malaga vs. Penachos, 213 BANGGAT TAJOS
SCRA 516
2. De la Llana vs. Alba, 112 BASMAN SERRANO
SCRA 296
B. POWERS OF ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES
1. Tio vs. Videogram Regulatory COLIMOD SANDALO
Board, 151 SCRA 208
2. U.S. vs. Ang Tang Ho, 43 Phil DACALDACAL SAID
1
3. Ynot vs. IAC, 148 SCRA 659 DIANA RESTAURO
4. Marcos vs. Manglapuz 177 ELIAB RAMIREZ
SCRA 668
5. Carino vs. CHR, 204 SCRA ENCARNACION PARRUCHO
1991
6. LLDA vs. CA, 231 SCRA GIMENEZ MIRANDA
292
7. Rizal Empire Insurance Corp., GONZALES MAZO
vs. NLRC, 150 SCRA 565
C. QUASI-LEGISLATIVE POWER
1. Cruz vs. Youngberg, 56 Phil HALASAN MARASIGAN
234
2. Araneta vs. Gaitmaitan, 101 HIABLER, A MAMBURAM
Phil 328
3. People vs. Maceren, 79 SCRA HIBALER, B LAURE
250
4. Bautista vs. Juinio, 127 SCRA JUEVES JUEVES
329
5. Maceda vs. ERB, 192 SCRA JUNGCO JUNGCO
363
6. Philippine Consumers LAURE HIBALER, B
Foundation vs. DECS, 153
SCRA 622
7. CIR vs. CA, 261 SCRA 236 MAMBURAM HIBALER, A
8. Taxicab Operators of Metro MARASIGAN HALASAN
Manila vs. BOT, 117 SCRA
597
9. US vs. Panlilio, 28 Phil 608 MAZO GONZALES
10. Holy Spirit Homeowners MIRANDA GIMENEZ
Association vs. Defensor, GR
No. 163980, 3 August 2006
11. Ople vs. Torres, 293 SCRA PARRUCHO ENCARNACION
141
12. PSDSA vs. De Jesus, GR No. RAMIREZ ELIAB
157299, 19 June 2006
D. QUASI-JUDICIAL POWER:
1. Syquia vs. Board of Power, 72 RESTAURO DIANA
SCRA 212
2. Globe Wireless vs. Public Service SAID DACALDACAL
Commission, 147 SCRA 269
3. Philippine Association of SANDALO COLIMOD
Lawyers vs. Agrava, 105 Phil
173
4. Guevarra vs. COMELEC, SERRANO BASMAN
104 Phil 268
5. Ang Tibay vs. CIR, 69 Phil TAJOS BANGGAT
635
6. Secretary of Justice vs. Lantion, BANGGAT TAJOS
GR No. 139465, 18 January
2000
 E. JUDICIAL REVIEW:
1. Abejo vs. Dela Cruz, 149 BASMAN SERRANO
SCRA 654
2. Bernardo vs. Abalos, GR No. COLIMOD SANDALO
137266, 5 December 2001
3. Industrial Enterprises vs. CA, DACALDACAL SAID
184 SCRA 426
4. GSIS vs. CSC, 204 SCRA DIANA RESTAURO
826
5. Paat vs. CA, 266 SCRA 167 ELIAB RAMIREZ
6. Valmonte vs. Belmonte, 170 ENCARNACION PARRUCHO
SCRA 256
7. Mangubat vs. Osmena, 105 Phil GIMENEZ MIRANDA
1308
8. Pros. Tabao vs. Judge Lilagan, GONZALES MAZO
AM No. RTJ-01-1651, 4
September 2001
9. Arrow Transportation vs. BOT, HALASAN MARASIGAN
63 SCRA 193
10. KBMPBM vs. Dominguez, 205 HIBALER, A MAMBURAM
SCRA 92
11. National Development Corp. vs. HIBALER, B LAURE
Hervilla, 151 SCRA 200
12. Atlas Consolidated Mining vs. JUEVES JUNGCO
Factoran, 154 SCRA 49
13. Carpio vs. Executive Secretary, JUNGCO JUEVES
206 SCRA 290
14. Heirs of Eugenio vs. Roxas, 173 LAURE HIBALER, B
SCRA 581
15. Industrial Power Sales vs. MAMBURAM HIBALER, A
Sinsuat, 160 SCRA 19
16. National Development Co. vs. MARASIGAN HALASAN
Collector of Customs, 9 SCRA
429

PUBLIC OFFICERS:
CASE TITLE STUDENT ASSIGNED SUBSTITUTE
I. Introduction
A. PUBLIC OFFICE:
1. Secretary of DOTC v. Mabalot, BANGGAT TAJOS
378 SCRA 129 (2002)
2. Dario v. Mison, 176 SCRA 84 BASMAN SERRANO
(1989)
3. Mathay v. Court of Appeals, COLIMOD SANDALO
320 SCRA 703 (1999)
4. Preclaro v. Sandiganbayan, 247 DACALDACAL SAID
SCRA 454 (1995
5. Laurel v. Desierto, 381 SCRA DIANA RESTAURO
48 (2002
B. DE FACTO PUBLIC OFFICERS:
1. Dimaandal v. COA, 291 ELIAB RAMIREZ
SCRA 322 (1998)
2. Menzon v. Petilla, 197 SCRA ENCARNACION PARRUCHO
251 (1991)
3. Malaluan v. COMELEC, 254 GIMENEZ MIRANDA
SCRA 397 (1996)
4. Flores v. Drilon, 223 SCRA GONZALES MAZO
568 (1993)
5. Civil Liberties Union v. HALASAN MARASIGAN
Executive Secretary, 194
SCRA 317 (1991)
 II. Commencement of Official Relations
A. ELIGIBILITY AND QUALIFICATIONS:
1. Poe-Llamanzares v. HIBALER, A MAMBURAM
COMELEC, G.R. No.
221697, March 8, 2016
2. Labo v. COMELEC, 211 HIBALER, B LAURE
SCRA 297 (1992)
3. Frivaldo v. COMELEC, 275 JUEVES JUNGCO
SCRA 727 (1996)
4. Bengzon v. HRET, 357 JUNGCO JUEVES
SCRA 545 (2001)
5. Mercado v. Manzano, 307 LAURE HIBALER, B
SCRA 630 (1999)
6. Romualdez-Marcos v. MAMBURAM HIBALER, A
COMELEC, 248 SCRA 300
(1995)
7. Lecaroz v. Sandiganbayan, 305 MARASIGAN HALASAN
SCRA 396 (1999)
B. DISQUALIFICATIONS:
1. Civil Liberties Union v. MAZO GONZALES
Executive Secretary, 194
SCRA 317 (1991)
2. Dela Cruz v. COA, 371 MIRANDA GIMENEZ
SCRA 157 (2001)
3. Abeto v. Gareeza, 251 SCRA PARRUCHO ENCARNACION
539 (1995)
4. Rabe v. Flores, 272 SCRA RAMIREZ ELIAB
415 (1997)
5. Public Interest Center v. Elma, RESTAURO DIANA
494 SCRA 53 (2006)
6. Liban v. Gordon, G.R. No. SAID DACALDACAL
175352 (2009)
7. Risos Vidal and Lim v. SANDALO COLIMOD
COMELEC and Estrada,
G.R. No. 206666, Jan. 21,
2015
C. ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OR TITLE TO OFFICE:
• Appointment:
1. PLM v. IAC, 140 SCRA 22 SERRANO BASMAN
(1985)
2. Luego v. Civil Service TAJOS BANGGAT
Commission, 143 SCRA 327
(1986)
3. Regis v. Osmeña, 197 SCRA BANGGAT TAJOS
308 (1991
4. Achacoso v. Macaraig, 195 BASMAN SERRANO
SCRA 235 (1991)
5. Marohombasar v. Alonto, 194 COLIMOD SANDALO
SCRA 391
6. Sinon v. Civil Service DACALDACAL SAID
Commission, 215 SCRA 410
(1992)
7. Province of Camarines Sur v. DIANA RESTAURO
Court of Appeals, 246 SCRA
281 (1995)
8. Gloria v. De Guzman, 249 ENCARNACION RAMIREZ
SCRA 281 (1995)
9. Matibag v. Benipayo, 380 ELIAB PARRUCHO
SCRA 49 (2002)
10. Erasmo v. Home Insurance, 388 GIMENEZ MIRANDA
SCRA 112 (2002)
11. Padilla v. Civil Service GONZALES MAZO
Commission, 403 SCRA 116
(2003)
12. Civil Service Commission v. HALASAN MARASIGAN
Dela Cruz, 437 SCRA 403
(2004)
13. Civil Service Commission v. HIBALER, A MAMBURAM
Darangina, 513 SCRA 648
(2007)
14. Corpuz v. Court of Appeals, HIBALER, B LAURE
285 SCRA 23 (1998)
15. Lapinid v. CSC, G.R. No. JUEVES JUNGCO
96298, May 14, 1991
16. Gen. Manager v. Monse Rat, JUNGCO JUEVES
381 SCRA 200 (2002)
• Appointment by the President:
1. Sarmiento v. Mison, 156 LAURE HIBALER, B
SCRA 549 (1987)
2. Calderon v. Carale, 208 SCRA MAMBURAM HIBALER, A
254 (1992)
3. Velicaria-Garafil v. Office of the MARASIGAN HALASAN
President, G.R. No. 203372,
June 16, 2015
4. De Castro v. JBC, G.R. No. MAZO GONZALES
19002, March 17, 2010
• Appointment under Civil Servcie Qualification Standard:
1. Juco v. NLRC, 277 SCRA MIRANDA GIMENEZ
528 (1997)
2. EIIB v. Court of Appeals, 299 PARRUCHO ENCARNACION
SCRA 373 (1998)
3. Chua v. Civil Service RAMIREZ ELIAB
Commission, 206 SCRA 65
(1992)
4. Cuevas v. Bacal, 347 SCRA RESTAURO DIANA
338 (2000)
5. PAGCOR v. Rilloraza, 359 SAID DACALDACAL
SCRA 525 (2001)
6. Aquino v. Civil Service SANDALO COLIMOD
Commission, 208 SCRA 240
(1992)
7. Tria v. Sto. Tomas, 199 SCRA SERRANO BASMAN
833 (1991)
8. Griño v. Civil Service TAJOS BANGGAT
Commission, 194 SCRA 458
(1991)
9. Civil Service Commission v. BANGGAT TAJOS
Salas, 274 SCRA 414 (1997)
10. Province of Camarines Sur v. BASMAN SERRANO
Beatrice Gonzales, G.R. No.
185740, July 23, 2010
11. Civil Service Resolution No. COLIMOD SANDALO
001156, Carmencita Reyes, re:
Provincial Administrator
• Remedy to Question Title:
1. Torrosa v. Singson, 232 SCRA DACALDACAL SAID
553 (1994)
2. Mendoza v. Allas, 302 SCRA DIANA RESTAURO
623 (1999)
3. Romualdez v. Civil Service ELIAB RAMIREZ
Commission, 225 SCRA 285
(1993)
III. Duties, Responsibilities, Rights, And Privileges of Public Officers
A. SCOPE OF POWER:
1. Morte v. Mutuc, G.R. No. L- ENCARNACION PARRUCHO
20387, January 31, 1968
2. Rabe v. Flores, 272 SCRA GIMENEZ MIRANDA
415 (1997)
3. PAGC v. Pleyto, G.R. No. GONZALES MAZO
176058 (2011)
4. Samson v. Rivera, G.R. No. HALASAN MARASIGAN
178454 (2011)
B. RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES:
1. Baybay Water District v. HIBALER, A MAMBURAM
Commission on Audit, 374
SCRA 482 (2002)
2. Rodrigo v. Sandiganbayan, 303 HIBALER, B LAURE
SCRA 309 (1999)
3. Tejada v. Domingo, 205 SCRA JUEVES JUNGCO
138 (1992)
4. Santos v. Court of Appeals, 345 JUNGCO JUEVES
SCRA 553 (2000)
C. PERSONNEL ACTION:
• Promotion:
1. Panis v. Civil Service LAURE HIBALER, B
Commission, 229 SCRA 589
(1994)
2. Divinagracia v. Sto. Tomas, 244 MAMBURAM HIBALER, A
SCRA 595 (1995)
3. Santiago v. Civil Service MARASIGAN HALASAN
Commission, 178 SCRA 102
(1989)
4. Abila v. Civil Service MAZO GONZALES
Commission, 198 SCRA 102
(1991)
5. Medenilla v. Civil Service MIRANDA GIMENEZ
Commission, 194 SCRA 278
(1991)
6. Lustero v. IAC, G.R. No. PARRUCHO ENCARNACION
74814, July 16, 1991
• Transfer:
1. People v. Reyes, 247 SCRA RAMIREZ ELIAB
328 (1995)
2. Vinzons-Chato v. Natividad, RESTAURO DIANA
224 SCRA 787 (1995)
3. Vinzonz-Chato v. Zenorosa, SAID DACALDACAL
344 SCRA 18 (2000)
• Detail:
1. Republic v. Court of Appeals, SANDALO COLIMOD
182 SCRA 721 (1990)
• Reassignment:
1. Teotico v. Agda, 197 SCRA SERRANO BASMAN
675 (1991)
2. Cariño v. Daoas, 380 SCRA TAJOS BANGGAT
355 (2002)
3. Pastor v. City of Pasig, 382 BANGGAT TAJOS
SCRA 232 (2002)
• Reinstatement:
1. Sabello v. DECS, 180 SCRA BASMAN SERRANO
623 (1989)
2. Monsanto v. Factoran, 170 COLIMOD SANDALO
SCRA 190 (1989)
3. Cabagnot v. Civil Service DACALDACAL SAID
Commission, 233 SCRA 59
(1993)
D. RIGHT TO SELF-ORGANIZATION:
1. Tupas v. NHA, 173 SCRA DIANA RESTAURO
35 (1989)
2. SSS v. CA, 175 SCRA 686 ELIAB RAMIREZ
(1989)
3. Bangalisan v. CA, 276 SCRA ENCARNACION PARRUCHO
617 (1997)
E. OTHER RIGHTS/BENEFITS:
1. Borromeo v. Civil Service GIMENEZ MIRANDA
Commission, 199 SCRA 911
(1991
2. Lopez v. CA, 215 SCRA 512 GONZALES MAZO
(1992)
3. People v. Jalosjos, 324 SCRA 689 HALASAN MARASIGAN
(2000)
4. Santos v. Court of Appeals, 345 HIBALER, A MAMBURAM
SCRA 553 (2000)
5. Cena v. Civil Service Commission, HIBALER, B LAURE
211 SCRA 179 (1992)
6. Rabor v. Civil Service Commission, JUEVES JUNGCO
244 SCRA 614 (1995)
7. GSIS v. COA, 441 SCRA JUNGCO JUEVES
(2004)
8. Gozon v. Court of Appeals, 212 LAURE HIBALER, B
SCRA 235 (1992)
F. LIABILITIES:
1. Cojuangco v. Court of Appeals, MAMBURAM HIBALER, A
309 SCRA 602 (1999)
2. Tecson v. Sandiganbayan, 318 MARASIGAN HALASAN
SCRA 80 (1999)
3. Ocampo v. Ombudsman, 322 MAZO GONZALES
SCRA 17 (2000)
4. Rodrigo v. Sandiganbayan, 303 MIRANDA GIMENEZ
SCRA 309 (1999)
5. Lacson v. Executive Secretary, 301 PARRUCHO ENCARNACION
SCRA 298 (1999)
IV. Termination of Official Relations
A. EXPIRATION OF TERM:
1. Achacoso v. Macaraig, supra RAMIREZ ELIAB
2. Lecaroz v. Sandiganbayan, RESTAURO DIANA
supra
3. Gloria v. De Guzman, supra SAID DACALDACAL
B. RESIGNATION:
1. Ortiz v. COMELEC, 162 SANDALO COLIMOD
SCRA 812 (1988)
2. Estrada v. Arroyo, 353 SCRA SERRANO BASMAN
452 (2001)
3. Republic v. Singun, G.R. No. TAJOS BANGGAT
149356, March 14, 2008
C. ACCEPTANCE OF INCOMPATIBLE OFFICE:
1. Public Interest Center v. Elma, 494 BANGGAT TAJOS
SCRA 53 (2006)
D. ABANDONMENT OF OFFICE:
1. Canonizado v. Aguirre, 351 BASMAN SERRANO
SCRA 359 (2001)
E. REMOVAL:
1. Aquino v. Civil Service COLIMOD SANDALO
Commission, 208 SCRA 240
(1992)
2. Fabella v. Court of Appeals, 282 DACALDACAL SAID
SCRA 256 (1997)
3. Aguinaldo v. Santos, 212 SCRA DIANA RESTAURO
768 (1992)
4. Salalima v. Guingona, Jr., 257 ELIAB RAMIREZ
SCRA 55 (1996)
5. Gloria v. Court of Appeals, 306 ENCARNACION PARRUCHO
SCRA 287 (1999)
6. Secretary of Education v. Court of GIMENEZ MIRANDA
Appeals, 342 SCRA 40 (2000)
7. Hagad v. Gozo-Dadole, 251 GONZALES MAZO
SCRA 242 (1995)
8. Sangguniang Barangay v. Martinez. HALASAN MARASIGAN
G.R. No. 170626, March 3,
2008
F. IMPEACHMENT:
1. Francisco v. House of HIBALER, A MAMBURAM
Representatives, G.R. No.
160261, 415 SCRA 44 (2003)
G. ABOLITION OF OFFICE:
1. Canonizado v. Aguirre, G. R. No. HIBALER, B LAURE
133132, January 25, 2000
H. CONVICTION OF A CRIME
1. Garcia v. Commission on Audit, JUEVES JUNGCO
226 SCRA 356 (1993)
I. RECALL
1. Garcia v. COMELEC, 227 JUNGCO JUEVES
SCRA 100 (1993)
2. Angobung v. COMELEC, 269 LAURE HIBALER, B
SCRA 254 (1997)
J. DISCIPLINARY CASES
1. Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals, MAMBURAM HIBALER, A
G.R. No. 168079, July 17, 2007
2. Marohomsalic v. Cole, G.R. No. MARASIGAN HALASAN
169918, February 27, 2008
3. Jason v. Torres, 290 SCRA 279 MAZO GONZALES
(1998)
4. Socrates v. Sandiganbayan, 263 MIRANDA GIMENEZ
SCRA 775 (1996)
5. Layus v. Sandiganbayan, 320 PARRUCHO ENCARNACION
SCRA 233 (1999)
6. Castro v. Gloria, 363 SCRA 417 RAMIREZ ELIAB
(2001)
7. Caniete v. Secretary of Education, RESTAURO DIANA
333 SCRA 849 (2000
8. Nalupta v. Tapec, 220 SCRA SAID DACALDACAL
505 (1993)
9. Office of the Court Administrator v. SANDALO COLIMOD
Librado, 260 SCRA 624 (1996)
10. Office of the Court Administrator v. SERRANO BASMAN
Judge Veneracion, 334 SCRA
145 (2000)
11. RTC Makati v. Dumlao, 247 TAJOS BANGGAT
SCRA 108 (1995)
12. Nieva v. Alvarez-Edad, 450 BANGGAT TAJOS
SCRA 45 (2005)
13. Santos v. Macaraig, 208 SCRA BASMAN SERRANO
74 (1992)
14. Garciano v. Oyao, 102 SCRA COLIMOD SANDALO
195 (1981)
LAW ON PUBLIC OFFICERS (CONT.)
K. REQUIREMENT FOR PUBLIC OFFICE:
1. Sarmiento vs. Mison, 156 SCRA DACALDACAL SAID
549
2. Luego vs. CSC, 143 SCRA 327 DIANA RESTAURO
3. Lacson vs. Romero, 84 Phil 740 ELIAB RAMIREZ
4. Costin vs. Quimbo, 120 SCRA ENCARNACION PARRUCHO
159
5. Monsanto vs. Factoran, 110 GIMENEZ MIRANDA
SCRA 190
6. Civil Liberties Union vs. Executive GONZALES MAZO
Secretary, 194 SCRA 317
7. Labo vs. COMELEC, 176 HALASAN MARASIGAN
SCRA 1
8. Yee vs. Director of Public Schools, 7 HIBALER, A MAMBURAM
SCRA 832
9. Laurel vs. Desierto, GR No. HIBALER, B LAURE
145368, 12 April 2002
L. DE FACTO OFFICERS:
1. Tayko vs. Capistrano, 53 Phil 866 JUEVES JUNGCO
2. Rodriguez vs. Tan, 91 Phil 724 JUNGCO JUEVES
3. Regala vs. CFI of Bataan, 77 Phil LAURE HIBALER, B
684
4. Solis vs. CA, 38 SCRA 53 MAMBURAM HIBALER, A
5. Monroy vs. CA, 20 SCRA 620 MARASIGAN HALASAN
6. Menzon vs. Petilla, 197 SCRA MAZO GONZALES
251
M. THE CIVIL SERVICE:
1. Juco vs. NLRC, GR No. 98107, MIRANDA GIMENEZ
18 August 1997
2. Maturan vs. Maglana, 113 SCRA PARRUCHO ENCARNACION
268
3. Corpus vs. Cuaderno, 13 SCRA RAMIREZ ELIAB
591
4. Pineda vs. Claudio, 28 SCRA 34 RESTAURO DIANA
5. National Service Corporation vs. SAID DACALDACAL
NLRC, 168 SCRA 122
6. Monsanto vs. Factoran, 170 SANDALO COLIMOD
SCRA 190
 7. SSS Employees Association vs. SERRANO BASMAN
CA, 175 SCRA 686
8. TUCP vs. NHA, 173 SCRA 33 TAJOS BANGGAT
9. Garcia vs. COA, GR No. L- BANGGAT TAJOS
75025, 14 September 1993
N. AUTHORITY OF THE PUBLIC OFFICER:
1. Festejo vs. Fernando, 94 Phil 504 BASMAN SERRANO
2. American Tobacco Co. vs. Director COLIMOD SANDALO
of Patents, 67 SCRA 286
O. INHIBITIONS/SALARY AND PERQUISITES:
1. Santos vs. CA, GR No. 139792, DACALDACAL SAID
22 November 2000
2. Laurel vs. CSC, 203 SCRA 195 DIANA RESTAURO
3. CSC vs. Dacoycoy, GR No. ELIAB RAMIREZ
135805, 29 April 1999
P. LIABILITY OF PUBLIC OFFICERS:
1. Tabuena vs. Sandiganbayan, 268 ENCARNACION PARRUCHO
SCRA 332
2. Correa vs. CFI, 92 SCRA 312 GIMENEZ MIRANDA
3. Ocampo vs. Office of the GONZALES MAZO
Ombudsman, GR No. 114683,
18 January 2000
4. OCA vs. Enriquez, 218 SCRA 1 HALASAN MARASIGAN
5. Chavez vs. Sandiganbayan, 193 HIBALER, A MAMBURAM
SCRA 282
Q. TERMINATION OF OFFICIAL RELATIONS:
1. Lecaroz vs. Sandiganbayan, GR HIBALER, B LAURE
No. 130872, 25 March 1999
2. Estrada vs. Macapagal-Arroyo, JUEVES JUNGCO
GR No. 146738, 2 March 2001
3. Collantes vs. CA, GR No. JUNGCO JUEVES
169604, 6 March 2007
4. General Manager, PPA vs. LAURE HIBALER, B
Monserate, GR No. 139616, 17
April 2002
5. Municipality of San Andres vs. MAMBURAM HIBALER, A
CA, GR No. 118883, 16
January 1998
6. Civil Liberties Union vs. Executive MARASIGAN HALASAN
Secretary, 194 SCRA 317
NOTES:
✓ Always communicate with your substitute and vice-versa in case you are planning to absent. ●:
"
✓ In case both of you will be absent, ask someone to recite the case on your behalf.
✓ In all cases, you will be given plus points when you recite.