Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CA and
CIR, G.R. No. 103092, G.R. No. 103106 There is absolutely nothing in
July 21, 1994 Section 24(b) (2) (ii), supra, which
indicates that the 15% tax on branch
FACTS: Bank of America (BOA) is foreign profit remittance is on the total amount
corporation duly licensed to engage in of profit to be remitted abroad which
business in the Philippines. shall be collected and paid in accordance
with the tax withholding device provided
On July 20, 1982, BOA paid 15% in Sections 53 and 54 of the Tax Code.
branch profit remittance tax in the The statute employs "Any profit remitted
amount of P7,538,460.72 on profit from abroad by a branch to its head office
its regular banking unit operations and shall be subject to a tax of fifteen per
P445,790.25 on profit from its foreign cent (15%)" — without more. Nowhere
currency deposit unit operations or a is there said of "base on the total amount
total of P7,984,250.97. The tax was actually applied for by the branch with
based on net profits after income tax the Central Bank of the Philippines as
without deducting the amount profit to be remitted abroad, which shall
corresponding to the 15% tax. be collected and paid as provided in
Sections 53 and 54 of this Code." Where
BOA filed a claim for refund with the law does not qualify that the tax
the BIR of that portion of the payment is imposed and collected at source
which corresponds to the 15% branch based on profit to be remitted
profit remittance tax, on the ground that abroad, that qualification should not
the tax should have been computed on be read into the law. It is a basic rule
the basis of profits actually remitted, of statutory construction that there is no
which is P45,244,088.85, and not on the safer nor better canon of interpretation
amount before profit remittance tax, than that when the language of the law
which is P53,228,339.82. is clear and unambiguous, it should be
applied as written. And to our mind, the
Without awaiting respondent's term "any profit remitted abroad" can
decision, petitioner filed a petition for only mean such profit as is "forwarded,
review on June 14, 1984 with this sent, or transmitted abroad" as the
Honorable Court for the recovery of the word "remitted" is commonly and
amount of P1,041,424.03. popularly accepted and understood. To
say therefore that the tax on branch
CIR contended that in computing profit remittance is imposed and
the 15% remittance tax, the tax should collected at source and necessarily the
be inclusive of the sum deemed remitted. tax base should be the amount actually
applied for the branch with the Central
The Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) Bank as profit to be remitted abroad is to
upheld petitioner’s claim for refund. ignore the unmistakable meaning of plain
words.
Court of Appeals set aside the
decision of the Court of Tax Appeals on In the 15% remittance tax, the law
Sept. 19, 1990. specifies its own tax base to be on the
"profit remitted abroad." There is
Hence, these petitions for review. absolutely nothing equivocal or uncertain
about the language of the provision. The
ISSUE: WON the 15% branch profit tax is imposed on the amount sent
remittance tax should be assessed on the abroad, and the law (then in force) calls
amount actually remitted abroad. for nothing further.