Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Preface – 1page
INDEX – 1page
BODY ----------------->
The Kols were one of the tribes inhabiting the Chhotanagpur area.
They lived in complete autonomy under their traditional chiefs but this changed when the
British came.
Along with the British came the moneylenders and the merchants.
The Kols then lost their lands to farmers from outside and also had to pay huge amounts of
money in taxes. This led to many becoming bonded labourers.
The British judicial policies also caused resentment among the Kols.
There was an insurrection in 1831-32 which saw the Kols organise themselves and revolt
against the British and the moneylenders.
They killed many outsiders and burned houses. This armed resistance went on for two years
after which it was brutally suppressed by the British with their superior weaponry.
The Kol Rebellion was so intense that troops had to be called in from Calcutta and Benares
to crush it.
Leader – buddha bhagat , joa bhagat, jhindrai manki, sui munda
SANTHAL HOOL-
The Santhal Hul (also known as the Santhal revolt) occurred in the regions of present-day
Jharkhand, Odisha and West Bengal against the British as well the Zamindari system from
1855 until 1856 when the movement was crushed by the British.
When the Zamindari system was introduced in the Bengal presidency, the British and the
Zamindars claimed the traditional Santhal land as their own.
The Santhals were exploited mercilessly by the landlords who charged exorbitant rates of
interest (sometimes as high as 500%) which ensured that the tribals were never able to repay
their loan.
They lost their land and also were turned into bonded labourers.
They had to suffer extortions, forceful deprivation of property, abuse and violence, cheating
in business deals, wilful trampling of their crops, etc.
The government supported the landlords instead of helping the tribals whose grievances
were genuine.
The rebellion started in June 1855 when two brothers Sidhu and Kanhu Murmu organised
10000 Santhals and began an armed uprising.
They killed many moneylenders and Company agents. The revolt was very intense and
massive in scale.
The Santhal community celebrates the day of rebellion to this day.
The revolt was violently suppressed by the British with about 20000 Santhals being killed
including the two leaders.
Leaders- Sidhu, kanhu, chand, bhairav
MUNDA-
CHUAR REVOLT---
Chuar Uprising
The first Chuar uprising erupted in response to the jungle zamindars'
increased earnings. The money was difficult to generate because the forest
region produced little.
Furthermore, in 1767, the British residents of Midnapur were ordered to
demolish their mud forts, which infuriated the zamindars.
In 1768, Jagannath Singh, the zamindar of Ghatsila (or the monarch of
Dhalbhum), led a rebellion with thousands of Chuar supporters. The
Company's government surrendered.
The Chuar sardars, Shyam Ganjan of Dhadka, Subla Singh of
Kaliapal, and Dubraj, rose in revolt in 1771. However, the uprising was
put down this time.
Durjan (or Durjol) Singh led the most major revolt in 1798.
The East India Company's tax and administrative policies (including the
Permanent Settlement), as well as the police restrictions enforced in rural
Bengal, rendered the practice of employing local paiks obsolete since they
were eventually replaced by professional police.
In the Chuar uprising of 1798, disgruntled paiks and common Chuars
banded together with the jungle zamindars.
Durjan Singh was the zamindar of Raipur, which he lost due to the actions
of the Bengal Regulations.
In May 1798, his supporters, a group of 1,500 Chuars, engaged in violent
operations in Raipur to prevent the auction of Raipur's estate.
In 1799, the British violently repressed the insurrection. Other Chuar
chiefs were Madhab Singh, the raja of Barabhum's brother; Raja Mohan
Singh, zamindar of Juriah; and Lachman Singh of Dulma.
The individuals involved in the uprisings were all connected to the land in
some way: zamindars, paiks, and common Chuars.
It may be said that there was a collision of lifestyles. The rebels had
previously lived an agricultural lifestyle, in a small community.
The invasion of colonial armies into their territory introduced them to a
new circumstance that disrupted their way of life.
They were also unwilling to accept foreigners (or non-Adivasis).
Some historians believe the epithet 'Chuar' to be disparaging, and instead,
refer to this as the Revolt of the Jungle Mahal.