MARKING RUBRIC

NUMBERS AND NUMBER STRUCTURE

PRESENTATION TO ASSESS CLO4 (Group – Topic 2: Number Base) (weightage 10%)

Grade Scale
10.0 Descriptor
marks

- The content is very accurate about the basic number system

Amat 9.0-10.0 - Content discussion very clearly stated (CPTS2)
Cemerlang - Able to show the relationship between the various basic number
(A+) systems studied very clearly
90- 100 - Able to make connections between various basic number systems
very well
- Able to compare the differences of various number systems very
Clearly (A4,C4)
- The example given in the analysis is very clear
- Very able to use arguments / knowledge in real context
- Very clear evidence, there is collaboration in the production of ideas,
arguments and joint formulations(TS3,CS3)

Cemerlang 7.0-8.9 - Accurate content about the basic number system

(A or A-) - Content discussion clearly stated. CPTS2)
75-89 - Be able to show the relationship between the various basic number
systems studied clearly
- Able to make connections between various basic number systems
well
- Able to compare the differences of various basic number systems
Clearly (A4,C4)
- The examples given in the analysis are clear
- Ability to use arguments/knowledge in a real context
- Clear evidence, the existence of collaboration in the production of
ideas, arguments and joint formulations (TS3,CS3)

Kepujian 5.0-6.9 - The content is quite accurate about the basic number system
( B+, B or B-) - Content discussion is quite clear CPTS2)
60-74 - Able to show the relationship between the various basic number systems
studied quite clearly
- Able to make connections between various basic number systems quite well
- Able to compare the differences of various basic number systems quite clearly
- The example given in the analysis is quite clear(A4,C4)
- Can use arguments/knowledge in real context
- Quite clear evidence, the existence of collaboration in the production of ideas,
arguments and conclusions together (TS3,CS3)

Lulus 3.0-4.9 - Inaccurate content about the basic number system

(C+ or C) - Content discussion with less clarity CPTS2)
50-59 - Lack of ability to show the relationship between the various basic number
systems studied
- L ack of ability to make connections between various basic number systems
- Lack of ability to compare the differences between various basic number
systems (A4,C4)
 - There are examples given in the analysis but less can use
arguments/knowledge in real context
- Less clear evidence, the existence of collaboration in the production of ideas,
arguments and conclusions together (TS3,CS3)

Gagal <3.0 - Inaccurate content about the basic number system

(C-, D+, D or F) - Content discussion vaguely CPTS2)
< 50 - Unable to show the relationship between the various basic number systems
studied
- Not the ability to make connections between various basic number systems
- Unable to compare the differences of various basic number systems (A4,C4)
- Some examples given in the analysis cannot use arguments/knowledge in a
real context
- There is no evidence of collaboration in the production of ideas, arguments and
conclusions together (TS3,CS3)