BANKSTERS AND WARMONGERS

Auteur:
Giorgio Spagnol
Date de publication:
6/7/2019

Source: http://www.ieri.be/en/publications/wp/2019/juillet/banksters-and-warmongers

War is profitable. The Rothschild family have funded the losers and the winners of all wars since the Napoleonic
Wars of 1803 to 1815. They fund both sides so that whichever side wins, they profit. In 1815, Napoleon Bonaparte is
campaigning against Wellington. Jacob Rothschild, in Paris, funds Napoleon while Nathan Rothschild, in London,
funds Wellington. Soon, the family decides that it is more profitable if Britain wins the war as the British royal family
is indebted to the Rothschild family: thus, Jacob limits the funds to Napoleon’s army.

Knowing that Britain is winning the war, Nathan starts selling off his British bonds in lump sums. Other traders
conclude that France must be winning and Britain losing. They also dump their British bonds in large sums. As a
result, the price of the bond plummets and becomes very low. Once Nathan sees that the other traders have sold all
their bonds, he begins buying them back at ridiculously low prices. When the news reaches the ordinary citizens that
Britain has won the war, the value of the British bond rises so high that Nathan makes a huge profit. Ever since, the
Rothschild family use their money and power to design the economies of other countries in the world. They also
create economic crashes to make a profit out of them, just like they do in Britain in 1815.

The Rothschilds

The family's patriarch, Mayer Amschel Rothschild, is a Jewish financer and a personal banker of the German royals.
In the year 1760, he begins a banking business in the city of Frankfurt. Over time, he accumulates a huge fortune.

Amschel has five sons who establish banks in the European cities of Vienna, London, Naples, Paris and Frankfurt.
Together, they coordinate the banking activities of all of Europe. They lay the foundations of banking and form close
relations with the ruling families in the countries where they establish banks. Practically every member of the
Rothschild family is very rich and occupies a position of immense power. This multinational banking family is a
byword for wealth, power and discretion.

Their wealth is primarily in the world of banking. However, they have massive investments in other industries such
as real estate, oil and construction. They are rumoured to control the world through debt and usury and as of today,
while withdrawing somewhat from banking, they seem to have put much of their wealth into natural resources and
food, two areas of importance in the future in terms of a growing global population, being control of the food supply
and energy the next logical steps . Will they keep consolidating power until a new world order is established with
the Rothschild as central players with domination of the world’s resources?
The Rothschilds and others

The practice initiated by the Rothschilds of having several brothers of a firm establish branches in the different
financial centres was followed by other Jewish financiers, like the Bischoffsheims, Pereires, Seligmans, Lazards and
others. By this means, Jewish financiers obtained an increasing share of international finance during the middle and
last quarter of the 19th century.

Rothschild family banking businesses pioneered international high finance during the industrialisation of Europe and
were instrumental in supporting railway systems across the world and in financing projects such as the Suez Canal.
During the 19th century, the family bought up a large proportion of the property in Mayfair, London. Moreover, the
Rothschild family was directly involved in the Independence of Brazil from Portugal in the early 19th century.

The family also funded Cecil Rhodes in the creation of the African colony of Rhodesia and the Japanese government
approached the London and Paris families for funding during the Russo-Japanese War.

In late 2010, Baron Benjamin Rothschild said that the family had been unaffected by the financial crisis of 2007–
2010, due to their conservative business practices: "We came through it well, because our investment managers did
not want to put money into crazy things."

Just hearing the name "Rothschild" conjures up images of unfathomable wealth and power. There is no doubt that
the family invented international finance as we know it by introducing concepts such as diversification, rapid
communication, confidentiality, and high volume to the world markets.

Nathan Rothschilds did maintain: “I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire
on which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire, and I control
the British money supply.”

To get a contemporary idea of the size and influence of the Rothschild family, there would have to be a merger
between Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, and the International Monetary Fund to even
approach the size and influence of the money Rothschild owned banks controlled.

There are some people who go so far as to claim that the Rothschilds are already the heads of a "New World Order"
that controls the world's central banking system, were behind the 9/11 attacks, financed the communist revolution
and own 99% of the world's news and media organizations.

The Rockfellers and the Rothschilds

But let's look briefly at the history of the Rockefeller and Rothschild families and, in doing so, provide a glimpse of
what these families did to become so powerful.

Shortly after starting the Standard Oil Company in 1870, John D. Rockefeller became the world’s first billionaire. He
used his money to help create and fund the Federal Reserve along with the Rothschild, which gave these families
the ability to print money out of thin air. This put them well above the U.S. government in terms of power and
influence, and this move to gain power over the government and the people via a rigged financial system is a
historical event not often discussed in school and in the media.

With oil prices skyrocketing and these families grabbing control of the money supply, Rockefeller quickly had the
U.S. government in his pocket. He was free to manipulate society, because he had control over the most worshipped
resource: money.

Throughout Rockefeller history, the name has stamped itself deep into the popular psyche through its philanthropy.
John D. Rockefeller founded Chicago University and Rockefeller University, as well as the Rockefeller Foundation.

It was his son, John D Rockefeller Junior, who built New York’s Rockefeller Centre. Each generation of the
Rockefellers kept on building up the current account, while spreading the philanthropic interests. His five sons
continued the dynastic pattern.

A philanthropic streak runs through the Rothschilds, too. Jacob Rothschild’s home, Waddesdon, in Buckinghamshire
now belongs to the National Trust, but he continued to cram it with treasures and endowed the National Gallery
generously during his time as chairman of its trustees.

The new union between the two clans does more than weld two vast fortunes to each other by allying a pair of
dynasties that have followed the two rules that all mega-plutocrats must obey if they want to be remembered. One:
ensure your children feel a duty to preserve the family fortune. And, two, paradoxical as it may sound: give as much
money as you can to universities, galleries and hospitals.

It is also rumored that the Rothschilds, along with other western bankers and industrialists, financed the rise of
Hitler as a bulwark against the Soviets while being interwoven with the Catholic Church, the traditional mafia, the
CIA and the Vatican Bank.

How banks benefit from wars

Wars were common, relatively small in scale and had little disruptive economic effects. Financing them however
brought substantial business opportunities as well as money transfers across front lines.

Governments need money to get weapons to fight in their wars. Companies need quick amount of cash to buy the
resources to create the weapons to fight in the war. Banks are there to give them money. During the Nuremberg
trials, the Nazi party admitted that if it had not been for the Swiss banks, they would not have been able to fight
for as long.

The United States fought the American Revolution primarily over King George III's Currency Act, which forced the
colonists to conduct their business only using printed bank notes borrowed from the Bank of England at interest.
After the revolution, the new United States adopted a radically different economic system in which the government
issued its own value-based money, so that private banks like the Bank of England were not siphoning off the wealth
of the people through interest-bearing bank notes.

Although World War One started between Austria-Hungary and Serbia , it quickly shifted to focus on Germany, whose
industrial capacity was seen as an economic threat to Great Britain. Germany was portrayed as the prime opponent
of World War One and eventually was not just defeated, but its industrial base flattened. Following the Treaty of
Versailles, Germany was ordered to pay the war costs of all the participating nations, even though Germany had not
actually started the war. This amounted to three times the value of all of Germany itself.

As had been the case in World War One, Great Britain and other nations threatened by Germany's economic power
looked for an excuse to go to war, and as public anger in Germany grew over the boycott, Hitler foolishly gave them
that excuse.

It must be anyway stressed that in 1933 Wall Street bankers and financiers had bankrolled the successful coups by
both Hitler and Mussolini. Brown Brothers Harriman in New York was financing Hitler right up to the day war was
declared with Germany.

Albert Einstein was of the opinion that the late entry of the US into the war against Germany was because the US
was controlled by bankers who were making money off of Hitler.

Modus operandi

The Private Central Banking system, by design, always creates more debt than money with which to pay that debt.
Private Central Banking is a set of arbitrary rules created to benefit the owners of the Private Central Bank. The
fraud persists, with often lethal results, because the people are tricked into believing that this is the way life is
supposed to be and no alternative exists or should be dreamt of. Private Central Banks do not exist to serve the
people, the community, or the nation. Private Central Banks exist to serve their owners, to make them richer and
richer. Baron M.A. Rothschild did say “Give me control over a nation's currency, and I care not who makes its laws”.

Behind wars, lies a single policy of dictatorship. The private central bankers allow rulers to rule only on the condition
that the people of a nation be dependant on the private central banks. Failing that, said rulers could be disposed of
and their nation invaded by those other nations dependant on private central banks.

So, is the so-called "clash of civilizations" a war between banking systems, with the private central bankers forcing
themselves onto the rest of the world, no matter how many people must die for it? This brings us to the current
situation in the Ukraine, Russia, and China.

The European Union had been courting the government of the Ukraine to merge with the EU, and more to the point,
entangle their economy with the private-owned European Central Bank. The government of the Ukraine was
considering the move, but had made no commitments. Part of their concern laid with the conditions in other EU
nations dependant on the ECB, notably Cyprus, Greece, Spain, and Italy. So they were cautious.

Then Russia stepped in with a better deal and the Ukraine dropped the EU and announced they were going to go
with Russia's offer. It was at that point that agents provocateurs flooded into the Ukraine, covertly funded by CIA
stirring up trouble, while the western media proclaimed this was a popular revolution.

This is a classic pattern of covert overthrow we have seen many times before. Since the end of WW2, the US has
covertly tried to overthrow the governments of 56 nations, succeeding 25 times.

Examples include the 1953 overthrow of Iran's elected government of Mohammed Mossadegh and the imposition of
the Shah, the 1973 overthrow of Chile's elected government of Salvador Allende and the imposition of the Pinochet
dictatorship, and of course, the recent overthrow of Ukraine's elected government of Yanukovich and the imposition
of the current unelected government, which is already gutting the Ukraine's wealth to hand it to the western bankers.

Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa have formed a parallel financial system called “BRICS Pay” with 80
nations ready to trade with BRICS in transactions that do not involve the US dollar. Despite US economic warfare
against both Russia and China, the Ruble and Yuan are seen as more attractive for international trade and banking
than the US dollar, hence the US attempt to fan the Ukraine crisis into war with Russia, and attempts to provoke
North Korea as a back door to war with China.

Considerations

The idea of banks began as long ago as 1,800 BC in Babylon. In those days moneylenders made loans to people. In
Greece and Rome banks made loans and accepted deposits. They also changed money. However with the collapse
of the Roman Empire trade slumped and banks temporarily vanished. However banking began to revive again in the
12th and 13th centuries in the Italian towns of Florence and Genoa. In the 16th century a German family called the
Fuggers from Augsburg became very important bankers.

Nowadays, virtually unknown to the US general public is the fact that the US Federal Reserve is a privately owned
company, siting on its very own patch of land, immune to the US laws. This privately owned company (controlled by
the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and Morgans) prints the money for the US Government, which pays them a remarkable
interest for the "favor."
In 1835, US President Andrew Jackson declared his disdain for the international bankers:"You are a den of vipers. I
intend to rout you out. If the people only understood the injustice of our money and banking system, there would
be a revolution before morning."

There followed an unsuccessful assassination attempt on President Jackson's life. This was the beginning of a pattern
of intrigue that would plague the White House itself over the coming decades. Both Lincoln and JFK tried to rid the
country of banksters and have been murdered.
Flag waving and propaganda aside, all modern wars are wars by and for the private bankers, fought and bled for by
third parties unaware of their true reason. The process is quite simple. As soon as the Private Central Bank issues its
currency as a loan at interest, the public is forced deeper and deeper into debt.

When the people are reluctant to borrow any more, that is when the Keynesian economists demand the government
borrow more to keep the pyramid scheme working. When both the people and government refuse to borrow any
more, that is when wars are started, to plunge everyone even deeper into debt to pay for the war, then after the
war to borrow more to rebuild. When the war is over, everyone is in debt to the private bankers for the next century.

Conclusion

I would like to conclude with the famous boastful statement of Nathaniel Meyer Rothschild, speaking to a group of
international bankers in 1912: "The few who could understand the system (cheque, money, credits) will either be so
interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favours, that there will be no opposition from that class, while on
the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that
capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting the
system is inimical to their interests.”

Mayer Amschel Rothschild, John D. Rockefeller and J. P. Morgan have waited nearly two centuries to see their dreams
fulfilled. Such patience has made their families successful by steadfastly maintaining the rules of the game as set
down by their founders. After citing Rothschild, it might be worthwhile to add a pair of meaningful sayings attributed
to J. P. Morgan: “If you have to ask how much it costs, you can’t afford it” and to John D. Rockefeller: “The way to
make money is to buy when blood is running in the streets”.

Wars upon wars are created with the single target to make more money and have more power. Only war can make
great profits. Thus, out of the financial boardrooms, WWI, WWII, the Korean war, Vietnam war, Cold War, Iran-Iraq
war, Balkan war, Libyan war and the Middle East wars were created.

In the last decade as part of WWIII the financial boardrooms brought a monetary collapse with money not worth the
paper it was printed on.
So there we are with banksters, who can never have enough, getting more dictatorial power by the day and not
caring for the rest of the world.
As long as Private Central Banks are allowed to exist, there will be poverty, hopelessness, and wars: the path to
peace on Earth lies in the abolishment of all private central banking everywhere, and a return to the state-issued
value-based currencies that allow nations and people to become prosperous and to decide their own destiny. Unless
we want ourselves being pushed over the cliff, we must wake up from our slumber and take our lives in our own
hands and get back to a normal peaceful life.