SUMMARY

Land use Population density

Station Urban Zone Multimodal Integration Land value increment
2000 2020 2000 2020
MG road Metro Station Urban core Intracity Commercial (26%) Commercial (40%) 209 people/Ha 434 people/Ha 52%
Sandal Soap Factory Metro station Urban High Regional Industrial (52%) Residential (25%) 123 people/Ha 398 people/Ha 64%
Puttenahalli Metro Station Sub-urban Intracity Residential (22%) Residential (42%) 117 people/Ha 330 people/Ha 68%
Inception Stage - 2000

209 person / Ha 123 person / Ha 117 person / Ha

Post Construction Stage - 2020

₹ 52% ₹ 64% ₹ 68%

434 Persons / Ha 398 Persons / Ha 330 Persons / Ha

LEGEND Commercial Green open Military Public/semi public Residential Industrial Transportation Vacant

Impacts of Metro Stations in their Immediate Urban Neighbourhood Iteration 4 | DRP 2021 | Masters of Urban Planning | CEPT University
 Conclusion and Recommendations

Impacts of Metro Stations in their Immediate Urban Neighbourhood Iteration 4 | DRP 2021 | Masters of Urban Planning | CEPT University
 CONCLUSION - IMPACT OF DEVELOPMENT PATTERN

• Limited influence on land use changes due to the Land ownership profile and natural characteristics.
• Land use impact have occurred after 2005. Metro’s impact in terms of conversion of residential to
apartments, to mixed use and residential or mixed to commercial and new development on open/ vacant
Land use Changes land.
• Land parcels have amalgamated to take leverage of permissible higher development opportunities in
terms of FSI and building heights.

• Metro have a positive impact on land values in nearby areas land along the metro corridor.
• Partial benefits are leveraged due to the existing land ownership/use profile.
• The land value in all the metro station areas are increased at a minimum of 50% by post completion
Land value Increment period.
• Absolute increment in land prices is higher in immediate vicinity. Highest rise has been seen in between
the buffer of 150m- 500m of the station area.

• Land use densification has emerged in terms of increased building heights.

Built Form Densification • Due to increased demand of commercial & retails spaces, land scarcity for horizontal expansion and
favorable development opportunities, buildings have grown vertically.
• Higher usage of FSI in the immediate vicinity of metro station.

Impacts of Metro Stations in their Immediate Urban Neighbourhood Iteration 4 | DRP 2021 | Masters of Urban Planning | CEPT University
 RECOMMENDATIONS

The Recommendations are planned at 2 Levels:

For three metro stations - To Improve the transit For City Level Interventions – The develop and
oriented development with the specific station bridge the gap between authorities and the
character. planning Mechanism of the city development.

Impacts of Metro Stations in their Immediate Urban Neighbourhood Iteration 4 | DRP 2021 | Masters of Urban Planning | CEPT University
 RECOMMENDATIONS MG ROAD METRO STATION

Vision To enhance the identity of the area as a city level commercial center as well as an attractive neighborhood for all sections of the society by ensuring good living and
working conditions for all with achieving optimum growth around the metro station which responds to and capitalizes on the demand of real estate market.

Incentive for
Station Urban Zone Road width Plot size (sq.m) Proposed Land use FAR Ground coverage Setbacks Parking
AHU
Up to 12m Up to 360 As per RMP-2015, primary 75% 1
4 All parking included in FAR
12-18m 360-1000 survey 65% Up to 12m Ht - 1.5m 1
Up to 30m Ht - 3m
MG road Metro
Urban core 18-24m 1000-2000 60% Above 30m Ht, increment of 1m per two 1
Station 4+0.5 floors All parking are not included in
24-30m 2000-4000 Mutation corridor (Additional FAR for 55% (built to line for mutation corridor) 1
FAR
plots within 250m)
Above 30m Above 4000 50% 1

Compact Mixed Development Approach

LEGEND
Mutation corridor

Existing Land use Envisioned Land use As per RMP - 2015 Envisioned Urban form
Source: BBMP, Property tax database 2000 – 2020, Karnataka guidance value report -2000 -2020, Primary survey
Impacts of Metro Stations in their Immediate Urban Neighbourhood Iteration 4 | DRP 2021 | Masters of Urban Planning | CEPT University
 RECOMMENDATIONS SANDAL SOAP FACTORY METRO STATION

Vision To enhance the existing transit nodes that provide regional connectivity, which would help decongest the city core as well as provide people alternative transit choice
and to strengthen the existing economic activities with a compact development that has a safe walkable street network.”

Incentive for
Station Urban Zone Road width Plot size (sq.m) Proposed Land use FAR Ground coverage Setbacks Parking
AHU
Up to 12m Up to 360 As per RMP-2015, primary 75% 1
3 All parking included in FAR
12-18m 360-1000 survey 65% Up to 12m Ht - 2m 1
Up to 30m Ht - 4m
Sandal Soap Factory
Urban High 18-24m 1000-2000 60% Above 30m Ht, increment of 1m per two 1
Metro Station 4+0.5 floors All parking are not included in
24-30m 2000-4000 Mutation corridor (Additional FAR for plots 55% (built to line for mutation corridor) 1
FAR
within 250m)
Above 30m Above 4000 50% 1

Multi-modal Transit centre with business oriented

commercial development

LEGEND
Mutation corridor

Existing Land use Envisioned Land use As per RMP - 2015 Envisioned Urban form
Source: BBMP, Property tax database 2000 – 2020, Karnataka guidance value report -2000 -2020, Primary survey
Impacts of Metro Stations in their Immediate Urban Neighbourhood Iteration 4 | DRP 2021 | Masters of Urban Planning | CEPT University