Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Genetics Class D
Study Program of Biology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Jember University
Kalimantan Streat number 37, Kampus Tegalboto, Jember 68121
ABSTRACT
One of the topics of discussion in the genetics practicum is DNA isolation, this practicum aims to
determine simple methods of isolating fruit DNA and to determine the effectiveness of detergents / soap used
for DNA isolation. The DNA isolation process carried out is simple DNA isolation, where the materials and
tools needed are easily available in every area during this pandemic. However, simple DNA isolation has a
lower yield quality than other methods, such as PCR and other methods which must be performed in a sterile
laboratory without contamination of other particles that can affect the DNA results. In this practicum, each child
does a practicum individually in their respective areas. So, we can obtain and collect data on the results of class
practicum and conclude which materials can have the greatest influence, as well as what factors can affect the
results of the practicum in this DNA isolation process.
From the table the results of this observation The third experiment was group 5 and 6
can be seen the various kinds of experimental who carried out DNA isolation experiments with
results that have been carried out by each child tomatoes, all of whom used mama lime branded
from our class. The first experiment was by groups dish soap. In this DNA isolation experiment on
1 and 2 who carried out DNA isolation experiments tomatoes 4 children conducted an experiment with
with papaya fruit, various soap used, 5 children an alcohol concentration of 95% and 5 children
using the Bukrim brand and 2 children using the using an alcohol concentration of 70%. The
Wing Ekonomi brand. Almost all of them used a estimated time needed for DNA to appear is at
70% alcohol concentration and only 1 child used a most 30 minutes and the fastest is 3 minutes.
95% alcohol concentration. The longest time Meanwhile, the amount of DNA that appears all
needed until the appearance of various DNAs is 6 shows less (++).
minutes and the fastest is 1 minute. The results of Based on the results of this class of data, in
the large number of papaya DNA that appear my opinion detergent is more effective for use in
mostly get a lot of results (+++). DNA isolation, because detergent functions to
Then, the second experiment was carried out dissolve fat in the cell membrane, so that cells can
by groups 3 and 4 who carried out DNA isolation lysis. In addition, this detergent can inhibit DNase
experiments with pears, the detergents used came which can damage DNA and can denature proteins,
from different brands which contained different so that protein can be removed from the solution.
contents such as Rinso, So Klin, and Daia. Like the When using soap mostly shows less DNA yield
previous experiment, most of them used an alcohol than using detergent.
concentration of 70% and 1 child used an alcohol However, this cannot be the only
concentration of 98%. The longest time needed to determinant in the DNA isolation process. Because
emerge DNA was 18 minutes and the fastest was 2 there are many things that can affect the success of
minutes, including the experiment using 98% DNA isolation. Among them are: The first is the
alcohol concentration, it took 2 minutes to appear water content of the fruit used, the more water
DNA. The results of the large number of pear DNA content, the less DNA will be precipitated. The
that appeared 5 children got a lot of results (+++), 3 water content in each fruit is different, it can give
children got less results (++), and 1 child got very different results. Fruit with high water content will
less results (+). produce different isolates when compared to fruit
with low water content. The higher the water
content of the cells dissolved in the extract, the less Walter. 2014. Essential Cell Biology. Fourth
it will be. So that the precipitated DNA will also be Edition. United States of America: Garland
small. The next factor is soap or detergent used, Science.
different levels of soap composition such as SDS Arfa, Namira Nur., B. S. Daryono., Reflinur. 2018.
and SLS, soap or detergent which has a greater Comparison of detergent and CTAB method
concentration will also have a greater influence on for isolation of DNA from Salak (Salacca
the results of DNA isolation. The third is the tool zalacca (Gaert.) Voss. ‘Pondoh’). Biology,
used in the isolation practicum, the sterilization of Medicine, & Natural Product Chemistry. 7(1):
the tool is very important in this case, because 15-20.
contaminated tools and materials can cause DNA Beckmann, Jacques S., T. C. Osborn. 2012. Plant
from other organisms to enter the experimental Genomes: Methods for Genetic and Physical
solution. Mapping. USA: Springer.
The next factor is filtering, filtering Daryono, Budi Setiadi., A. B. I. Perdamaian. 2019.
including an important step so that no other Karakterisasi dan Keragaman Genetik Ayam
particles are involved in the solution, thus affecting Lokal Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada
the results of the observation. The filtering tool that University Press.
should be used is filter paper which has very small Haxhijaha, Arita Sabriu., G. Ilievska, V.
pores, however, due to the unfavorable conditions, Stojkovski, K. Blagoevska. 2020. A modified
tissue or cotton wool is used for filtering. This sds – based method applied for extraction of
certainly greatly affects the results of the DNA high-quality dna from raw corn and roasted
isolation. Failure may occur due to inadequate soybean. Macedonian Veterinary Review. 43
filtering so that many other particles are included in (1): 61-67.
the solution. Then the level of alcohol Maneerutanarungroj, Cherdsak., A. Incharoensakdi.
concentration can also affect the success in the 2016. Rapid method for DNA isolation from a
DNA isolation process. So that in this DNA tough cell wall green alga Tetraspora sp.
isolation practicum we must be very careful to CU2551. World Journal of Microbiology and
minimize the possibility of failure and to determine Biotechnology. 32(6): 99
the results of DNA isolation experiments we need Murtiyaningsih, Hidayah. 2017. Isolasi dna genom
to consider many things as a reference. dan identifikasi kekerabatan genetik nanas
menggunakan rapd (random amplified
polimorfic dna). Agritrop. 15(1): 83-93.
CONCLUSSION Nugroho, Endik Deni., D. A. Rahayu. 2016.
The conclusion is that we can perform Penuntun Praktikum Bioteknologi.
simple DNA isolation that is easy for anyone to do Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
with affordable tools and materials. However, there Riahi, Mehrshid., M. Babaei., F. Ghahremaninejad.
are still some things that must be considered in the 2019. Genomic dna isolation from
simple DNA isolation process, such as the moisture scrophularieae dried leaves using a simple,
content in the fruit used, the alcohol concentration, high-throughput protocol. Bangladesh Joutnal
the type and content of SDS (Sodium Dedocyl of Botany. 48(4): 1231-1235
Sulfate) from the soap and detergent used which Sundari. 2017. Pengembangan Protokol Isolasi
can affect the DNA results, cleanliness. the tools DNA Genom Tanaman Durian Dengan
used, and the filtering process, which can affect the Menggunakan Modifikasi Bufer CTAB.
results or the success of the DNA isolation process TECHNO. 6(2): 30-37
itself. Widyastuti, Dyah Ayu. 2017. Isolasi DNA
Based on the data obtained, in my opinion Kromosom Salmonella sp. dan visualisasinya
detergent is more effective for use in DNA pada elektroforesis gel agarosa. Prosiding
isolation, because detergent functions to dissolve SNPBS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi
fat in the cell membrane, so that cells can lysis. In dan Saintek) Ke-2.
addition, this detergent can inhibit DNase which
can damage DNA and can denature proteins, so
that protein can be removed from the solution.
When using soap mostly shows less DNA yield
than using detergent.
REFFERENCES
Alberts, Bruce., D. Bray., K. Hopkin., A. D.
Johnson., J. Lewis., M. Raff., K. Robert., P.