You are on page 1of 4

BERTHOLD SCHWARZ

RALPH E. OESPER
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio

N 0 CHEMICAL invention has affected the course


of history more profoundly than the discovery of
gunpowder, yet chemical historians can discuss
about 1360.5 He believed that in the accounts of
early battles and sieges, written long after the events,
the writers applied the terms cannon and bombards,
this topic in general terms only. "It is probably quite with which they were familiar, to mechanical engines
incorrect to speak of the discovery of gunpowder. Prom of war, such as catapults and ballistae. Gunpowder
modem researches it seems more likely and more just to in warfare was used a t first to frighten the enemy and
think of it as a thing that has developed, passing through for incendiary purposes; the development of a device
many stages, mainly of improvement, but some un- in which this explosive combustible could he used for
doubtedly retrograde." There really is not sufficient
solid evidence on which to pin down its invention to one
man. The honor, however, has been associated with
two names in particular, Berthold Schwarz, a German
monk, and Friar Roger Bacon. Of the former, Oscar
Guttmann writes (Monumate pulveris pyrii, 1904,p.
6), "Berthold Schwarz was generally considered to
be the inventor of gunpowder, and only in England has
Roger Bacon's claim been upheld, though there are
English writers who have pleaded in favor of Schwarz.
Most writers are agreed that Schwarz invented the
first firearms, and as nothing was known of an in-
ventor of gunpowder, it was perhaps justifiable to give
Schwarz the credit thereof."'
No contemporary documents or accounts dealing
with Schwarz2 are known, those who contend that he
never existed may be correct, but a t least tradition,
which usually has an historical basis, justifies the
monument to his memory a t Freiburg. The most
exbaustive study of the Schwarz question is that of
Hansjakob3who, after a critical review, was convinced
that a Franciscan monk, Constantin Anklitzen, later
known as Berthold Schwarz, discovered gunpowder
and invented firearms a t Freiburg about 1250. There
is no need to present here the minutiae of the reasoning
by which he arrived a t these conclusions, hut some of
the evidence he adduces is of sufficient general interest
to he given wider circulation.
The monument gives 1354 as the date of the inven-
tion; this cannot be correct as there are authentic
records of gunpowder and firearms in the first half of
the fourteenth ~ e n t u t y . ~Hansjakob, however, ac-
cepted the verdict of Temler that guns and powder
were not used in the modem sense in Europe until
"Encyclopedia Britannica," 11th ed., Encyclopedia Britan-
nica Co.. New York City, 1910; article "Gunpowder."
The spelling Schwartz is not used now by the Germans. propelling missiles might well have consumed the
a HANSJAKOB, HEINRICE,"Der schwarze Berthold. Der greater part of a century or more. The manufacture
Efinder des Schiesspulvers und der Feuerwaffen. Eine kri- -
tische Untersuchung." 91 pp. Herder'sche Buchhandlung, The earliest record of the actual use of cannon in Germany
Freibure im Breiseau. 1891. This is out of mint: it could not is 1365. See LOCKEMANN, G., "Die Burg Salederhelden" (pri-
be locacd in Unitid States: after considera& difficulty a copy vately printed) 1916. H e c i t e R a r ~ c m B.,
, "Das Geschiitz im
was found in Germany. Mittelalter," Berlin, 1928, who gives 1321 as the date of the first
' 1324, Metz; 1326, Florence; 1338. Paris; 1342, Aachen. use of firearms in warfare.
of practical guns required considerable engineering skill, Hemmerlin (1359-1464) who wrote, "From the writings
and their development t o the stage of artillery that was it may be seen that the invention came to light for the
not more dangerous t o the user than t o the target could first time within two hundred years." Hansjakob
never have been accomplished between 1354 and the takes this as proof that the inventor could have been
period when firearms came into quite general use. alive in 1250. Aventinus (1466-1534), on the other
hand, who believed that Hemmerlin wrote in 1454,
took the mean of the "two hundred years" and so
arrived a t 1354@the date accepted by the sponsors

PREPARATION
FOR THE EXPCRIMEN.~

Hansjakob rests his case for 12.50 principally on three


facts. (1) A deed drawn up a t St. Martin's Church
in Freiburg in 1245 was witnessed by a Magister Ber-
thold. This title indicates a man of learning who may
well have been acquainted with chemicals. (2) A
drinking song written before or a t the completion of
the spire of the Freiburg cathedral in 1296 mentions

Andri Theilel, "Portraits el oies des hornm.2 illurtres," Paris,


1584

of the statue erected on the five hundredth anniversary,


i. e., 1853.
The name Berthold Schwarz had a rather interesting
development. Most of the chroniclers agree that the
inventor was Constantin Anklitzen, who took the
monastic name Berthold. T o his neighbors, both lay
and clerical, his chemical endeavors were black magic,
and in the early chronicles he was dubbed Bertholdus
niger. Later this was changed to Bertholdus Niger,
so that, in German, der schwarze Berthold became
Berthold Schwarz.'
The birthplace of the inventor or the scene of the
invention has been placed in no less than six other
cities: Cologne, Goslar, Dortmund, Mainz, Nurem-
6 Felicis Malleoli vulgo Hemmerlin . . . de nobilitate et rustici-
tate dialogus. AVENTINUS (Johannes Thurmayr aus Abensberg)
Annales Bojorum.
Hansjakob holds Aventinus responsible for this error also.
"shooting from a gun." (3) The earliest known He ooints out that it would be iust as silly to change Albertus
printed reference to Berthold's invention was that of ahu us to Albert Gross,
MAKING
GUNPOWDER
Goya, Madrid, Polucio Real

berg, Prague. There is now agreement that only carried this chance observation into a practical form,
Freiburg, if any, has valid claims, but this imposing and improved day by day, the gun a t last surpassed
list serves to emphasize how the chroniclers have let all other instruments of warfare. Another version tells
their imaginations run riot on this subject. that he was concocting a medicament and heated
Tradition is always more than ready to fill the gaps together oil, sulfur, and saltpeter. The oil caught
in recorded history; there are numerous fanciful ac- fire and the cover flew into the air. A variant of this
counts of the genesis of the invention. According to tale is that he was grinding the mixture and a spark
the earliest versions the "Master, niger Berchtoldus, flew into the mortar. A deafening roar followed, the
a Nygermanticus," was seeking to prepare a tincture pestle was blown out of his hand.
(pigment) for gilding metals. He heated saltpeter, Was the invention purely accidental or was it the
sulfur, lead, and oil in a well-closed copper pot; the consequence of purposeful experimentation? Some
resultant explosion led him to t r y again on a greater will have it that Berthold followed a plan when he
scale. Encouraged, he substituted charcoal for the pried into Nature's secrets. He had made a deep
lead and oil, had a cylindrical box cast, and tried study pf philosophy and had learned that two bodies
whether he could project a stone. Hemmerlin states cannot simultaneously occupy the same space, and
that he was trying to fix quicksilver so that it could be that the lighter elements, fire and air, occupy more
worked like silver. Seeking first to kill its spirit, he space than the heavier earth and water. Nature will
heated it, because fire and spirit are antagonistic, and not tolerate space void of all corporeal matter, and so
the spirit flies away in the smoke when a metal is everything composed of the four elements must even-
brought too close to the fire. However, the spirit of tually be resolved into fire. A mixture of pulverized
mercury could not be extinguished by fire and Berthold sulfur and saltpeter exposed to fire in a closed pot,
then tried another procedure. He knew fiery sulfur exploded with the production of smoke and flame.
and frigid saltpeter are hostile to each other, so why Encouraged by this realization of his expectations he
not subject the mercury to the heat of the battle went on, added charcoal to the mixture, and set it off
between these natural enemies? The three were in holes in tree trunks and stones. These successful
sealed in a stout vessel, put over the fire, and the vessel blastings led logically to the construction of wooden
was shattered with a terrific noise. He then used and then metal guns.
stronger vessels, bound with iron, the walls of the Why are there no contemporary records of Berthold
laboratory were blown to pieces. His inventive mind and his achievement?o If he is a purely . lecendary
.
- *The records of the Franciscan chapter in Freiburg were
8 A Freiburg manuscript of 1432 dealing with fireworks. destroyed or scattered before the Reformation.
inventor the answer is obvious. However, history may vention while in prison. According to another legend,
have taken no interest in his doings because guns were Berthold blew himself up while demonstrating the
said to be execrable inventions and their employment power of his discovery; another states that he was
(except against the unbelievers) was decried as de- executed.
structive of manly valor and unworthy of an honorable The lovers of fine points may argue over Berthold's
warrior. Berthold was reputed to have compounded existence, but i t can be historically established that
powder with Satan's blessing, and the clergy preached Freiburg in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries was
that as a co-worker of the Evil One he was a renegade a flourishing center for the casting of cannon and the
to his profession and his name should be forgotten. training of gunners. What, then, could be more fitting
There is a tradition that he was imprisoned by his than the interesting statue to the inventor-monk-
fellow-monks, and some say he made his diabolic in- chemist in the square before the Freiburg town hall?

You might also like