You are on page 1of 26

Regulatory Compliance - Basics

Kuala Lumpur, October 2007


Dr. Klaus Fritsch
Manager Compliance
Global Business Area LabTec

Agenda

ƒ Evolution of GxP‘s

ƒ The User‘s View on Compliance

ƒ Good Laboratory Practice GLP

ƒ Good Manufacturing Practice GMP

ƒ Part 11

ƒ Lessons learnt

1 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only


Courtesy Bayer

1
Evolution of GxP‘s

ƒ “Cola” contained cocaine till 1906

2 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

Evolution of GxP‘s

ƒ “Bib-Label Lithiated Lemon-Lime”


contained lithium citrate
from 1929 till 1950; name
changed to “7up” in 1933

3 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

2
Evolution of GxP‘s

ƒ “Thalidomide” manufactured by West


German company Grünenthal from
1957 till 1961: 12000 foetuses born
with deformations in 46 countries
(“Condergan”)

=> led to the first EC Directive on


Proprietary Medicinal
Products (1965/65/EC)

4 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

Evolution of GxP‘s

ƒ Cyanide was deliberately added to “Tylenol”


(paracetamol) in Chicago area in 1982
(crime was never solved)

=> led to tamper-proof packaging for


medicines

5 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

3
Evolution of GxP‘s

ƒ 89 children died in Haiti in 1996 from a


cough syrup containing diethylenglycol
(anti-freeze) instead of polyethylenglycol
(Dutch company, manufactured in China)

ƒ Diethylenglycol in toothpaste found in


Panama and the Dominican Republic

6 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

Evolution of GxP‘s

ƒ 2004 Chiron flu vaccines licence


suspended (UK and USA)
(bacterial contamination)

7 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

4
Evolution of GxP‘s

⇒ Common objective:
Protection of Public
Health and Consumer
Safety

8 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

Agenda

ƒ Evolution of GxP‘s

ƒ The User‘s View on Compliance

ƒ Good Laboratory Practice GLP

ƒ Good Manufacturing Practice GMP

ƒ Part 11

ƒ Lessons learnt

9 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only


Courtesy Bayer

5
The User‘s View on Compliance

Source: Sam Brooks, Novartis Consumer Health, GAMP Europe


Conference Brussels, December 2006 10 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

The User‘s View on Compliance

Source: Sam Brooks, Novartis Consumer Health, GAMP Europe


Conference Brussels, December 2006 11 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

6
The User‘s View on Compliance

Source: Sam Brooks, Novartis Consumer Health, GAMP Europe


Conference Brussels, December 2006 12 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

Agenda

ƒ Evolution of GxP‘s

ƒ The User‘s View on Compliance

ƒ Good Laboratory Practice GLP

ƒ Good Manufacturing Practice GMP

ƒ Part 11

ƒ Lessons learnt

13 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage


Courtesy only
Novartis

7
Good Laboratory Practice GLP
What is Good Laboratory Practice?
GLP is a quality assurance system,
which is legally binding in many countries
around the world, usually based on the
OECD GLP (slight differences from
country to country apply).

e.g. US law (21 CFR 58)


⇒ mandatory in the US

e.g. OECD Guidelines on GLP


⇒ are implemented in many developing
countries and supported by the WHO
⇒ are implemented in 2004/10/EC on GLP
and thus mandatory in Europe

14 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage


Courtesy only
Novartis

Good Laboratory Practice GLP


Scope of Good Laboratory Practice (OECD Principles of GLP)

“These principles of good laboratory practice should be applied to the


non-clinical safety testing of test items contained in

ƒ pharmaceutical products,
ƒ pesticide products,
ƒ cosmetic products,
ƒ veterinary drugs,
ƒ food and feed additives,
ƒ industrial chemicals.

[…] The purpose of testing these test items is to obtain data on their
properties and/or their safety with respect to human health and/or the
environment […] for the purpose of registering and licensing […].

15 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage


Courtesy only
Novartis

8
Good Laboratory Practice GLP
Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) – A Definition

OECD Principles of GLP

Good laboratory practice (GLP) is a quality system concerned with


the organizational process and the conditions under which non-
clinical health and environmental safety studies are

ƒ planned,
ƒ performed,
ƒ monitored,
ƒ recorded,
ƒ archived and
ƒ reported.

16 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage


Courtesy only
Novartis

GLP Requirements: Product Life Cycle


4.2. Apparatus used in a study should

1 be periodically inspected, maintained,


and calibrated according to standard
operating procedures.

17 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

9
GLP Requirements: Data Quality and Integrity
7.1 A test facility should have written

2 SOP’s that are intended to ensure


the quality and integrity of the
data generated by that test facility.

18 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

GLP Requirements: Data Quality and Integrity


7.1 A test facility should

2 have written SOP’s that are


intended to ensure the
quality and integrity of the
data generated by that test
facility.

19 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

10
GLP Requirements: Design and Cleaning
4.1/4.2 Apparatus should be of

3 appropriate design and be


cleaned periodically according to
SOP’s.

20 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

GLP Requirements: Qualification and Training


1.1.2. At a minimum [the test facility management] should:

4 (c) ensure the maintenance of a record of the


qualifications, training, experience and job description
for each professional and technical individual;

(d) ensure that


personnel clearly
understand the
functions they are to
perform and, where
necessary, provide
training for these
functions;

21 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

11
GLP Requirements: Standard Operating Procedures
7.4. Standard operating procedures should be available for,

5 but not be limited to, the following categories of test facility


activities. The details given under each heading are to be
considered as illustrative examples.
ƒ 2. (a) Apparatus: use, maintenance, cleaning and
calibration
ƒ 2. (b) Computerized systems: validation, operation,
maintenance, security, change control and back-up

22 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

ISO 9001 – Quality Management Systems


7.6 Control of monitoring and measuring

6 devices

„Where necessary to ensure valid


results, measuring equipment shall

a) be calibrated or verified at specified


intervals, or prior to use, against
measurement standards traceable
to international or national
measurement standards […];

b) be adjusted or re-adjusted as
necessary.“

23 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

12
SOP – Standard Operating Procedure
GxP require our customers to test and manufacture their
products according to detailed, written procedures:
SOP‘s: Standard Operating Procedures.

There must be an SOP for everything which is quality


relevant. SOP‘s need to be
1) written,
2) rewiewed and
3) approved,
and any change to an SOP needs the same formal
procedure of writing, reviewing, and approval.
Lab management and QC are involved in this process.

Each quality relevant process step must follow these


procedures and must be documented and signed by two
persons (e.g. lab technician and QC).
If it is not documented, it has not been done!

24 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

Quality Assurance and Quality Control

Quality Control

If an activity is carried out to appraise manufacturing outcome or detect


defects it is usually Quality Control.

ƒ Group responsible for ensuring that products meet the established


quality specifications and are tested and produced according to SOP‘s

ƒ Group responsible for approving SOPs, specifications and validation


documents

ƒ Group responsible for actual product testing

25 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

13
Quality Assurance and Quality Control

Quality Assurance

If an activity is carried out to prevent the possibility of occurrence of


defects it is usually Quality Assurance.
ƒ Group responsible for over-seeing the quality issues of the operations
ƒ Conduct internal audits, training and investigations of quality problems
ƒ Independent of the production and QC processes
ƒ Interact most with the FDA inspectors

“GxP Quality Assurance operates on the principle that quality cannot be


tested into products but must be built in at every step of the life cycle.”
(FDA statement)

26 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

Agenda

ƒ Evolution of GxP‘s

ƒ The User‘s View on Compliance

ƒ Good Laboratory Practice GLP

ƒ Good Manufacturing Practice GMP

ƒ Part 11

ƒ Lessons learnt

27 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only


Courtesy Bayer

14
What is GMP?

Generate
More
Paper?
28 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

Introduction to GMP
What is Good Manufacturing Practice?
GMP is a quality assurance system for consistent
production and control, which is legally binding in many
countries around the world (in the 3rd world commonly
based on the WHO GMP, and in the industrialised
countries sometimes stricter; e.g. in the US and Europe).

e.g. US law (21 CFR 210/211)


⇒ mandatory in the US

e.g. WHO Guides on GMP


(pharma, food, blood,…)
⇒ are implemented in many
developing countries
⇒ Europe: EU Guide on
Manufacture
29 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only
Courtesy Roche

15
Introduction to GMP

Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) – A Definition

“Good manufacturing practice (GMP) is that part of quality assurance


which ensures that products are consistently produced and controlled to
the quality standards appropriate to their intended use and as required
by the marketing authorization. GMP are primarily aimed at diminishing
the risks inherent in any pharmaceutical production. Such risks are
essentially of two types: cross-contamination (in particular of unexpected
contaminants) and mix-ups (confusion) caused by, for example, false
labels being put on containers.”

“Good manufacturing practices for pharmaceutical products”, WHO 1992

30 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only


Courtesy Roche

Key Elements of GMP - Qualification / Training


ƒ 9.2. The manufacturer should have an adequate number of personnel
with the necessary qualifications and practical experience.

ƒ 9.4. All personnel should be aware of the principles of GMP that affect
them and receive initial and ongoing training, including hygiene
instructions, relevant to their needs.

ƒ 10.2. […] Continuing training


should also be given, and its
practical effectiveness
periodically assessed.
Approved training programmes
should be available. Training
records should be kept.

31 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

16
Key Elements of GMP - Equipment
ƒ 13.1. Equipment must be located, designed,
constructed, adapted and maintained to suit
the operations to be carried out. The layout
and design of equipment must aim to mini-
mize the risk of errors and permit effective
cleaning and maintenance in order to avoid
cross-contamination, build-up of dust or dirt,
and, in general, any adverse effect on the
quality of the products.

ƒ 13.2. Equipment should be installed in such


a way as to minimize any risk of error or of
contamination.

32 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

Key Elements of GMP - Equipment

ƒ 13.5. Balances and other measuring


equipment of an appropriate range and
precision should be available for produc-
tion and control operations and should
be calibrated on a scheduled basis.

33 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

17
Key Elements of GMP - SOP’s

ƒ 15.35 Standard operating procedures should be available for each


instrument and piece of equipment (e.g. use, calibration, cleaning,
maintenance) […].

34 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

Agenda

ƒ Evolution of GxP‘s

ƒ The User‘s View on Compliance

ƒ Good Laboratory Practice GLP

ƒ Good Manufacturing Practice GMP

ƒ Part 11

ƒ Lessons learnt

35 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only


Courtesy Bayer

18
A Glance at the US Law….

21 CFR Part 11

CFR: Code of Federal Regulations


(=> US law)

21 CFR: „Foods and Drugs“

21 CFR Part 58: „GLP“


21 CFR Part 210/211: „GMP for Pharma“

and of course…..

21 CFR Part 11: „ER/ES“

36 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

Purpose of 21 CFR Part 11

ƒ To allow the use of electronic records and signatures instead of


having to store and submit paper records

ƒ To prevent, or at least reduce the risk of, records being deliberately


manipulated to falsify results

ƒ To prevent unauthorized access to data

ƒ To ensure traceability to the originator or owner of a record

ƒ Of course, our customers still have to comply with all “predicate


rules“ like e.g. GLP or GMP regulations

37 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

19
Purpose of 21 CFR Part 11

ƒ To allow the use of electronic records and signatures instead of


es
having to store and submit paper records
p ani ere
ƒ To prevent, or at least reduce the risk of, records S com deliberately
th
ce the
U being
sin f
manipulated to falsify results
l ies to ever, rts o ut
a o
l y app ; how ther p ng ab l.
ƒ To prevent unauthorized access on toedata S i a
11 th
U
n in o n talk ot ide
t o e
Par ing to islati 1 wh ugh n
ƒ To ensure traceability
R t g
CF xpor le le Part d, thof
to the originator or 1owner o a record
t 21 e b r
tha aour
a to nda
ƒ Oftecourse, n m par still
iescustomers f ershave ttoa comply with all “predicate
No o
rules“ m p e.g.t GLP
like co yr
or GMP
e
s as
regulations
c en od it a
and no rec veryb akes
is rld, e and t
wo /ES
ER

38 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

Interpretation of 21 CFR Part 11


ƒ 21 CFR Part 11 is vague so as not to force new requirements on the
industry

ƒ Companies in the regulated environment must define their own


realistic requirements

ƒ Each company has a different interpretation

ƒ FDA issued various guidelines for interpretation of 21 CFR Part 11,


the latest of them issued August 2003

ƒ A new draft part 11 was expected to be published for comment in De-


cember 2006, but the draft was rejected by the FDA legal department

39 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

20
Definitions in 21 CFR Part 11
Electronic record

ƒ Any combination of text, graphics, data etc. in digital form that is


created, modified, maintained, archived, retrieved or distributed by a
computer system

Electronic signature

ƒ Computer data compilation of a series of symbols authorized by an


individual to be the legally binding equivalent to their hand-written
signature

40 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

Responsibilities
ƒ Compliance is NOT the responsibility of the supplier, but of the user

ƒ Suppliers should make it as easy as possible for companies to comply


- provide systems that support compliance where possible
- provide suggestions on how to achieve compliance

ƒ Other measures may be necessary from the pharmaceutical


company’s side:
- access control
- SOP’s prohibiting access and documenting required procedures

41 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

21
Responsibilities
ƒ Compliance is NOT the responsibility of the supplier
,
m ers It is
ƒ Suppliers should make it as easy as possible for companies
st o t“. totecomply
cu i an d
- provide systems that support compliance o ur possible
where m pl alida s
o o s
b
- provide suggestions on how to achieve
a t 1 1 c ng a v acce
X tcompliance
gL ar usi ing e,…
p l yin X is p t by y hav plac
ƒ Other measures e
may
p Lab
sube „
necessary lian the
pfrom l
b ‘s in
e,pharmaceutical
r y : m p P
e a R sa be co d peo ry SO
company’swside:
hen NEVE as to traine cessa
-W ustcontrol h e
access
m w ho aving the n
e
w- SOPs r h g documenting required procedures
prohibiting access and
e use re, by havin
h
t twa by
sof ntrol,
co

42 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

Requirements for complying with Part 11


General requirements

ƒ System must be validated


ƒ System must be able to generate accurate and complete copies of
records in human readable and electronic form

Key requirements for electronic records

ƒ Access control and authority checks


- Possibility to assign access rights
ƒ Secure, computer generated, time-stamped audit trail
- Changes shall not obscure previous values
ƒ Ability to sign records
- Records shall contain the printed name of the signer, the date and time,
as well as the meaning of the signature
43 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

22
Requirements for complying with Part 11
Key requirements for Electronic Signatures

ƒ Signatures shall employ at least 2 distinct components and must be


unique to one individual
- e.g. ID and password

ƒ Controls for ID‘s and passwords


- ID‘s must be unique
- Must be possible to disable accounts
- Must be safegaurds to prevent unauthorized access and such attempts
must be reported

44 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

Requirements for complying with Part 11


Key requirements for Electronic Signatures
e use
ƒ Signatures shall employ at least 2 distinct components h f
w s tandiemust
u o be
unique to one individual all o in l
- e.g. ID and password r t 11 ures ut all
a at b
a nt: P sign ures, ready r.
t ic t l e
ƒ Controls for ID‘s and passwords
im por ctron signa flect a ustom
- ID‘s must be uniqueso le n re c
it is and e writte only on a
- Must be possible p
se otorddisable and finally sed u
s accounts
- Must c a u c h
be safegaurds
e to d
prevent o access and such attempts
unauthorized
i n, bebenreported
must ic r ds an art 11 s imp
a o r t
Ag lectr reco s of p men
e r t r e
of pape men equi
e Pr
uir
req ng Gx
sti
exi

45 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

23
Agenda

ƒ Evolution of GxP‘s

ƒ The User‘s View on Compliance

ƒ Good Laboratory Practice GLP

ƒ Good Manufacturing Practice GMP

ƒ Part 11

ƒ Lessons learnt

46 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only


Courtesy Bayer

Lessons learnt

ƒ GxP‘s are quality assurance systems which are legally binding in


many countries around the world

ƒ Main objective: Protection of Public Health and Consumer Safety

ƒ Documentation, training, testing, qualification and validation,


understanding the process, quality assurance and
control as well as the product life cycle are the key focus areas of GxP

ƒ GxP costs the industry a lot of money and work, and failure to comply
with GxP results in regulatory action

47 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

24
Lessons learnt

ƒ There is no single „THE GxP“; GxP does not dictate every detail, so
every company implements GxP differently

ƒ GxP is not a „cooking recipe“; this leads to customer doubts: „Is my


implementation of the GxP requirements compliant?“

ƒ Outsourcing responsibilites – and the associated risks – to suppliers is


a common strategy – and is a huge business opportunity for MT, if we
have the right tools in place to help the customer to be compliant and
to be confident that their processes are compliant

ƒ Compliance can only be achieved by having the right products, the


right services, the right training and the right expertise. A product
alone never allows our customers to be compliant with the regulations.

48 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

Our Opportunity…

Source: Sam Brooks, Novartis Consumer Health, GAMP Europe


Conference Brussels, December 2006 49 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

25
Regulatory Compliance - Basics

50 © K. Fritsch LabTec Internal usage only

26

You might also like