Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2018 XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited
Foreword
2018 is a year with significant changes for most if not all entities. First and foremost, for
annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018, all companies will have to contend with
the implementation of two new accounting standards, Revenue from Contracts with Customers
and Financial Instruments. In addition, for Singapore-incorporated companies with equity
and/or debt listed on Singapore Exchange, Business Trusts as well as foreign incorporated
companies listed on Singapore Exchange currently reporting under Financial Reporting
Standards for Singapore will have to apply a new financial reporting framework that is
equivalent to IFRS (Singapore Financial Reporting Standards (International)) The adoption of
the two new accounting standards, as well as the new financial reporting framework generally
requires retrospective application, with different approaches on the restatement of
comparatives and different optional reliefs available on transition.
In the wake of the new changes, implementation of the new standards and preparation of the
financial statements will indubitably entail significant time and effort in the current year. In
this 2018 publication of XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited, you may find the following sections
particularly useful in assisting you to get ready for the changes when preparing your
companies’ financial statements:
Illustrative disclosures of new reporting framework requirements effective for 2018 in
Note 2 to the financial statements, including impact arising from adoption of the two
new accounting standards;
As we move closer to 2019, enhanced disclosures on the expected impact on the
initial adoption of SFRS(I) 16 Leases in Note 2 to the financial statements.
We trust that this publication will greatly assist you in the preparation of your companies’
financial statements given the major changes in the financial reporting landscape. We would
highly encourage you to consult your EY member firm Assurance Partner if you have any
specific accounting queries.
This page has been left blank intentionally.
2018 XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited
Preface
The group adopted SFRS(I), a new financial reporting framework equivalent to IFRS on
1 January 2018. This publication illustrates first-time adoption of SFRS(I). For entities that are
not first-time adopters of SFRS(I), illustrative disclosures are available in Good Group
(International) Limited, illustrative financial statements published by EY International Financial
Reporting Standards Group. Reference to standards in the commentaries and reference
indices at the side of the publication are based on IFRS. The mapping of IFRS to its SFRS(I)
equivalent and FRS equivalent are available in the next two pages.
This publication reflects the requirements of SFRS(I) and interpretations issued as at
31 October 2018 that are required to be applied by an entity with an annual reporting period
beginning on or after 1 January 2018. The main body of this publication includes illustration
of disclosures of new standards or amendments which are mandatorily effective for annual
periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018.
To facilitate readers’ reference, we have side-lined key changes in this 2018 publication as
compared to the previous edition in this manner.
Illustrative in nature
The illustrative financial statements serve to provide illustration of a set of annual
consolidated financial statements of a group of companies whose activities include sales of
electronics equipment, installation of fire prevention equipment, property development,
construction and investment holding. The disclosures contained in these illustrative financial
statements are made based on a hypothetical group of entities and certain assumptions have
been made about the applicability of the disclosures required by SFRS(I). In addition, certain
disclosure requirements of the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited’s (SGX-ST)
Listing Manual have also been included in these illustrative financial statements. Readers
should note that the SGX-ST’s disclosure requirements may be included in other parts of the
entity’s annual report instead.
The illustrative financial statements are designed to capture a wide set of circumstances and
transactions which may not be relevant to all entities. Disclosures illustrated are those that
are relevant to the circumstance of XYZ. Also, since XYZ is a fictitious entity, assessing
materiality is not possible in some circumstances. XYZ is a helpful enabler for entities
preparing financial statements under SFRS(I), but its illustrative nature must be appreciated.
Important notices
This publication is intended as an illustrative guide rather than a definitive statement. While
the illustrative financial statements contain most of the usual disclosures typically found in
the financial statements of a group of companies whose activities include manufacturing,
property development and investment holding, the disclosures and commentaries in this
publication are not meant to be exhaustive. Reference should be made to the relevant
standards and regulations for specific disclosure requirements.
This publication should not be relied upon as a substitute for seeking professional advice
concerning the appropriate accounting treatment for specific individual situations or ensuring
compliance with the Singapore Financial Reporting Standards (International) and Singapore
Companies Act, Chapter 50.
2018 XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited
Preface
2018 XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited
Preface
2018 XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited
Preface
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this publication:
CA Singapore Companies Act, Chapter 50
IFRS International Financial Reporting Standards (International)
IFRIC INT Interpretations of IFRS
IFRS IG IFRS Implementation Guidance
SFRS(I) Singapore Financial Reporting Standards (International)
SFRS(I) INT Interpretations of SFRS(I)
SFRS(I) IG SFRS(I) Implementation Guidance
FRS Financial Reporting Standards in Singapore
INT FRS Interpretations of FRS
IAS International Accounting Standards
SSA Singapore Standards on Auditing
SGX Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited (SGX-ST)’s Listing Manual
2018 XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited
Contents
Page
General information 1
Director’s statement 2
Independent auditor’s report 7
Consolidated income statement 11
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income 12
Balance sheets 17
Statements of changes in equity 19
Consolidated cash flow statement 27
Notes to the financial statements 32
1. Corporate information 32
2. Summary of significant accounting policies 32
2.1 Basis of preparation 32
2.2 First-time adoption of Singapore Financial Reporting Standards
(International) (SFRS(I) 34
2.3 Standards issued but not yet effective 50
2.4 Basis of consolidation and business combinations 54
2.5 Transactions with non-controlling interests 57
2.6 Foreign currency 58
2.7 Property, plant and equipment 59
2.8 Investment properties 60
2.9 Intangible assets 61
2.10 Land use rights 62
2.11 Impairment of non-financial assets 62
2.12 Subsidiaries 63
2.13 Joint arrangements 63
2.14 Joint ventures and associates 64
2.15 Financial instruments 67
2.16 Impairment of financial assets 72
2.17 Cash and cash equivalents 73
2.18 Not in use
2.19 Development properties 73
2.20 Inventories 73
2.21 Provisions 74
2.22 Government grants 75
2.23 Financial guarantee 75
2.24 Borrowing costs 76
2.25 Convertible redeemable preference shares 76
2.26 Employee benefits 77
2.27 Leases 80
2.28 Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations 80
2.29 Revenue 81
2018 XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited
Contents
Page
2018 XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited
Contents
Page
Appendices
Appendix A Additional illustrative disclosures that are not relevant to XYZ Holdings
Appendix A-1 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income in one statement –
Illustrating the analysis of expenses by nature 235
Appendix A-2 Defined benefit plans 237
Appendix A-3 SFRS(I) 7 Hedge accounting disclosures 248
This page has been left blank intentionally.
Co. Reg. No 123456789Z
The names of people and corporations included as illustrations are fictitious. Any resemblance
to any person or business is purely coincidental
Co. Reg. No 123456789Z
The names of people and corporations included as illustrations are fictitious. Any resemblance to
any person or business is purely coincidental.
XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited and its subsidiaries
General information
Gneral information
Directors
Ang Beng Choo – Chairman
De Silva Elizabeth Frances – Chief Executive Officer
Goh Hock Inn
Jee Kim Leng
Musa Nasir Osman
Pek Que Ru
See Tong Tong
Registered office
[Address, telephone number, facsimile number and electronic mail address (if any)] SGX 1207.2
Solicitors
Laura & Co. LLP
Bankers
Good Bank Limited
South Bank Limited
CPA Bank Limited
[Address]
Directors’ statement
For the financial year ended 31 December 2018
The directors are pleased to present their statement to the members together with the audited CA 201.16
consolidated financial statements of XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited (the Company) and its
subsidiaries (collectively, the Group) and the balance sheet and statement of changes in equity
of the Company for the financial year ended 31 December 2018.
CA Sch 12.1.a
(i) the consolidated financial statements of the Group and the balance sheet and
statement of changes in equity of the Company are drawn up so as to give a true and
fair view of the financial position of the Group and of the Company as at 31
December 2018 and the financial performance, changes in equity and cash flows of
the Group and changes in equity of the Company for the year ended on that date;
and
(ii) at the date of this statement there are reasonable grounds to believe that the CA Sch 12.1.b
Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they fall due.
The directors of the Company in office at the date of this statement are:
Ang Beng Choo
De Silva Elizabeth Frances (appointed on 2 February 2018)
Goh Hock Inn
Jee Kim Leng
Musa Nasir Osman
Pek Que Ru
See Tong Tong
In accordance with Articles 93 and 94 of the Company’s Articles of Association, Jee Kim
Leng, Pek Que Ru and See Tong Tong retire and, being eligible, offer themselves for re-
election.
Directors’ statement
For the financial year ended 31 December 2018
CA Sch 12.9
4. Directors’ interests in shares and debentures
The following directors, who held office at the end of the financial year, had, according to
the register of directors’ shareholdings, required to be kept under Section 164 of the
Singapore Companies Act, Chapter 50, an interest in shares and share options of the
Company and related corporations (other than wholly-owned subsidiaries) as stated
below:
There was no change in any of the above-mentioned interests in the Company between SGX 1207.7
the end of the financial year and 21 January 2019.
Except as disclosed in this statement, no director who held office at the end of the
financial year had interests in shares, share options, warrants or debentures of the
Company, or of related corporations, either at the beginning of the financial year, or date
of appointment if later, or at the end of the financial year.
5. Options
SGX 853
At an Extraordinary General Meeting held on 23 December 2012, shareholders approved
the Senior Executive Option Plan and the General Employee Share Option Plan for the
granting of non-transferable options that are settled by physical delivery of the ordinary
shares of the Company, to eligible senior executives and employees respectively.
The committee administering the employee share option plans comprise three directors, SGX 852.1.a
Musa Nasir Osman, Pek Que Ru and See Tong Tong.
During the financial year: CA Sch 12.2
The Company has granted 37,000 share options under the Senior Executive Option
Plan. These options expire on 30 June 2023 and are exercisable if and when the
Group’s earnings per share amount increases by 12% within three years from the
date of grant.
The Company has also granted 163,000 share options under the General Employee
Share Option Plan. These options expire on 30 June 2023 and are exercisable if the
employee remains in service for three years from the date of grant and that certain
market conditions as detailed in Note 35 to the financial statements are met.
Directors’ statement
For the financial year ended 31 December 2018
5. Options (continued)
75,000 treasury shares were reissued at a weighted average exercise price of CA Sch 12.5
S$1.08 each, upon the exercise of options granted pursuant to the employee share
option plans.
Details of all the options to subscribe for ordinary shares of the Company pursuant to the CA Sch 12.6
employee share option plans as at 31 December 2018 are as follows:
Details of the options to subscribe for ordinary shares of the Company granted to SGX 852.1.b.i
directors of the Company pursuant to the Senior Executive Option Plan are as follows:
Aggregate
Options options granted Aggregate options Aggregate
granted since exercised since options
during commencement commencement of outstanding as
financial of plan to end of plan to end of at end of
Name of director year financial year financial year financial year
1
These options are exercisable between the periods from 30 June 2021 to 30 June 2023
at the exercise price of S$1.30 if the vesting conditions are met.
Since the commencement of the employee share option plans till the end of the financial SGX 852.2
year:
SGX 852.1.b.ii
No options have been granted to the controlling shareholders of the Company and their
associates
No participant other than the two directors mentioned above has received 5% or more SGX 852.1.b.ii
of the total options available under the plans SGX 852.c.i
SGX 852.1.c.ii
No options have been granted to directors and employees of the holding company and
its subsidiaries
No options that entitle the holder to participate, by virtue of the options, in any share CA Sch 12.2
issue of any other corporation have been granted
No options have been granted at a discount SGX 852.1.d
Directors’ statement
For the financial year ended 31 December 2018
6. Audit committee
CA 201B.9
The audit committee (AC) carried out its functions in accordance with Section 201B (5)
of the Singapore Companies Act, Chapter 50, including the following:
Reviewed the audit plans of the internal and external auditors of the Group and the
Company, and reviewed the internal auditor’s evaluation of the adequacy of the
Company’s system of internal accounting controls and the assistance given by the
Group and the Company’s management to the external and internal auditors
Reviewed the quarterly and annual financial statements and the independent auditor’s
report on the annual financial statements of the Group and the Company before their
submission to the board of directors
Reviewed effectiveness of the Group and the Company’s material internal controls,
including financial, operational and compliance controls and risk management via
reviews carried out by the internal auditor
Met with the external auditor, other committees, and management in separate
executive sessions to discuss any matters that these groups believe should be
discussed privately with the AC
Reviewed legal and regulatory matters that may have a material impact on the financial
statements, related compliance policies and programmes and any reports received
from regulators
Reviewed the cost effectiveness and the independence and objectivity of the external
auditor
Reviewed the nature and extent of non-audit services provided by the external auditor
Recommended to the board of directors the external auditor to be nominated,
approved the compensation of the external auditor, and reviewed the scope and results
of the audit
Reported actions and minutes of the AC to the board of directors with such
recommendations as the AC considered appropriate
Reviewed interested person transactions in accordance with the requirements of the
Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited’s Listing Manual
The AC, having reviewed all non-audit services provided by the external auditor to the SGX 1207.6.b
Group, is satisfied that the nature and extent of such services would not affect the
independence of the external auditor. The AC has also conducted a review of interested
person transactions.
The AC convened four meetings during the year with full attendance from all members,
except for one where a member was absent. The AC has also met with internal and
external auditors, without the presence of the Company’s management, at least once a
year.
Further details regarding the AC are disclosed in the Report on Corporate Governance.
7. Auditor
Ernst & Young LLP have expressed their willingness to accept re-appointment as auditor.
Directors’ statement
For the financial year ended 31 December 2018
CA 201.16
On behalf of the board of directors:
___________________________ ___________________________
Ang Beng Choo De Silva Elizabeth Frances
Director Director
27 February 2019
Commentary:
IAS 1 uses the terms statement of financial position and statement of cash flows. However, an
entity is not obliged to use these terminologies.
In this illustration, the Group has chosen to use the terms balance sheet and cash flow
statement. If an entity has chosen to use the terms introduced by IAS 1, the entity should make
reference to the terms used in its financial statements.
Presentation of the statement of changes in equity for the Company when consolidated financial
statements are presented is optional. In this illustration, the Company has chosen to present the
statement of changes in equity for the Company together with the consolidated financial
statements and balance sheet of the Company. Accordingly, the statement by directors includes
the directors’ opinion on whether the statement of changes in equity is drawn up so as to give a
true and fair view of the changes in equity of the Company. This applies to the auditor’s opinion
expressed in the independent auditor’s report as well.
Section 201B (5) of the Companies Act requires a description of the nature and extent of the
functions performed by the audit committee pursuant to Section 201B (5). If the nature and
extent of the functions are described in the Report on Corporate Governance and the Directors’
Report makes reference to the Report on Corporate Governance instead, the directors must
ensure that the Report on Corporate Governance describes the functions pursuant to Section
201B (5) of the Companies Act.
Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited SSA 700.21 and 22
CA 207.1
Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements SSA 700.44 and 45
Opinion SSA 700.23
We have audited the financial statements of XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited (the “Company”) and its SSA 700.24
subsidiaries (collectively, the “Group”), which comprise the balance sheets of the Group and the Company
as at 31 December 2018, the statements of changes in equity of the Group and the Company and the
consolidated income statement, consolidated statement of comprehensive income and consolidated cash
flow statement of the Group for the year then ended, and notes to the financial statements, including a
summary of significant accounting policies.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Group, the balance sheet and SSA 700.25
the statement of changes in equity of the Company are properly drawn up in accordance with the CA 207.2.a
provisions of the Companies Act, Chapter 50 (the Act) and Singapore Financial Reporting Standards
(International) (SFRS(I)) so as to give a true and fair view of the consolidated financial position of the
Group and the financial position of the Company as at 31 December 2018 and of the consolidated financial
performance, consolidated changes in equity and consolidated cash flows of the Group and changes in
equity of the Company for the year ended on that date.
Basis for Opinion SSA 700.28
We conducted our audit in accordance with Singapore Standards on Auditing (SSAs). Our responsibilities
under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial
Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Group in accordance with the Accounting and
Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA) Code of Professional Conduct and Ethics for Public Accountants
and Accounting Entities (ACRA Code) together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit
of the financial statements in Singapore, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in
accordance with these requirements and the ACRA Code. We believe that the audit evidence we have
obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Key Audit Matters SSA 700.30
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our
audit of the financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our
audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a
separate opinion on these matters. For each matter below, our description of how our audit addressed the
matter is provided in that context.
We have fulfilled our responsibilities described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial
Statements section of our report, including in relation to these matters. Accordingly, our audit included the
performance of procedures designed to respond to our assessment of the risks of material misstatement of
the financial statements. The results of our audit procedures, including the procedures performed to
address the matters below, provide the basis for our audit opinion on the accompanying financial
statements.
[Description of each key audit matter in accordance with SSA 701 Communicating Key Audit Matters in the
Independent Auditor’s Report] SSA 720.21 and32
Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not express any
form of assurance conclusion thereon. SSA 720.22.d
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information
and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial
statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, SSA 720.22.e
based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other
information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited (continued)
Responsibilities of Management and Directors for the Financial Statements SSA 700.33.a
Management is responsible for the preparation of financial statements that give a true and fair view in SSA 700.34.a
accordance with the provisions of the Act and SFRS(I), and for devising and maintaining a system of
internal accounting controls sufficient to provide a reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded
against loss from unauthorised use or disposition; and transactions are properly authorised and that they
are recorded as necessary to permit the preparation of true and fair financial statements and to maintain
accountability of assets.
In preparing the financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Group’s ability to SSA 700.34.b
continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the
going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the Group or to cease
operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
The directors’ responsibilities include overseeing the Group’s financial reporting process. SSA 700.34
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements SSA 700.38
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are SSA 700.37
free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that
includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an
audit conducted in accordance with SSAs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the
aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the
basis of these financial statements.
As part of an audit in accordance with SSAs, we exercise professional judgement and maintain professional SSA 700.39
scepticism throughout the audit. We also:
Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to SSA 700.39.b.i
fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit
evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not
detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error,
as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override
of internal control.
Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures SSA 700.39.b.ii
that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Group’s internal control.
Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting SSA 700.39.b.iii
estimates and related disclosures made by management.
SSA 700.39.b.iv
Conclude on the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of
accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related
to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going
concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our
auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are
inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to
the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Group to cease
to continue as a going concern.
SSA 700.39.b.v
Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements, including the
disclosures, and whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events
in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or SSA 700.38.c
business activities within the Group to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements.
We are responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the group audit. We remain
solely responsible for our audit opinion.
SSA 700.40.a
We communicate with the directors regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the
audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify
during our audit.
We also provide the directors with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements SSA 700.40.b
regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may
reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.
Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited (continued)
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements (continued)
From the matters communicated with the directors, we determine those matters that were of most SSA 700.40.c
significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit
matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public
disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should
not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be
expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements SSA 700.43
In our opinion, the accounting and other records required by the Act to be kept by the Company and by CA 207.2.b
those subsidiary corporations incorporated in Singapore of which we are the auditors have been properly
kept in accordance with the provisions of the Act.
The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is [Partner’s name]. SSA 700.46
_____________________
SSA 700.47
Ernst & Young LLP
Public Accountants and
Chartered Accountants
SSA 700.48
Singapore SSA 700.49
27 February 2019
Commentary:
SSA 701 Communicating Key Audit Matters (KAM)s In the Independent Auditor’s Report is
applicable to audits of complete sets of general purpose financial statements of listed entities.
Listed entities are defined in the Glossary of Terms to SSA as “an entity whose shares, stock or
debt are quoted or listed on a recognised stock exchange, or are marketed under the regulations
of a recognised stock exchange or other equivalent body“. As such, KAM reporting is also
applicable to entities which have their bonds or notes trading on SGX or other recognised stock
exchange.
This illustrative independent auditor’s report is of a listed entity which prepares consolidated
financial statements.
For illustrative auditor’s reports of private companies and other entity types, please refer to
Appendix 1 of AGS 1 Sample Independent Auditor’s Reports.
In this illustration, the Group has chosen to present its comprehensive income in two linked
statements. If an entity has chosen to present its comprehensive income in one single statement,
the reference to consolidated income statement should be removed.
Key audit matters (KAM)s relate to those matters that, in the auditor’s professional judgement,
were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and are
selected from matters communicated to those charged with governance.
This illustrative auditor’s report does not include illustration of KAMs of XYZ Holdings (Singapore)
Limited. The auditor’s report should be customised to include the KAMs according to the specific
circumstances of the entity.
SSA 720 The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Other Information defines other information as
financial or non-financial information (other than financial statements and the auditor’s report
thereon) included in an entity’s annual report.
A list of examples of amounts or other items that may be included in other information are
available in Appendix 1 of SSA 720.
In this illustration, the auditor has obtained all of the other information prior to the date of the
auditor’s report and has not identified a material misstatement of the other information.
For other illustrations of “Other information” paragraphs, such as when the auditor has not
obtained all of the other information prior to the date of the auditor’s report but expects to obtain
other information after the date of auditor’s report, or when the auditor has identified a material
misstatement of the other information, please refer to Appendix 2 in SSA 720.
Profit before tax from continuing operations 9 7,057 9,426 IAS 1.85
Profit from continuing operations, net of tax 5,500 7,693 IAS 1.85
Discontinued operation
IAS 1.82.ea, IFRS 5.33.a &
Loss from discontinued operation, net of tax 11 (544) (188) 33A
Attributable to:
Owners of the Company
Profit from continuing operations, net of tax 5,320 7,293 IFRS 5.33.d
Loss from discontinued operation, net of tax (544) (188) IFRS 5.33.d
Profit for the year attributable to owners of the Company 4,776 7,105 IAS 1.81B.ii
Non-controlling interests
Profit from continuing operations, net of tax 180 400
Loss from discontinued operation, net of tax – –
Profit for the year attributable to non-controlling interests 180 400 IAS 1.81B.i
Earnings per share from continuing operations attributable
to owners of the Company (cents per share)
Basic 12(a) 22.98 31.63 IAS 33.66 and 67A
The accompanying accounting policies and explanatory notes form an integral part of the financial statements.
(137) 16
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax 1,305 2,430 IAS 1.81A.b
Total comprehensive income for the year 6,261 9,935 IAS 1.81A.c
Attributable to:
Owners of the Company 6,091 9,475 IAS 1.81B.b.ii
Attributable to:
Owners of the Company
Total comprehensive income from continuing operations,
net of tax 6,585 9,643 IFRS 5.33.d
Total comprehensive income from discontinued operation,
net of tax (494) (168) IFRS 5.33.d
Total comprehensive income for the year attributable to
owners of the Company 6,091 9,475
The accompanying accounting policies and explanatory notes form an integral part of the financial statements.
Commentary:
* IAS 1 uses the terms statement of financial position and statement of cash flows. However,
an entity is not obliged to use these terms.
** An entity shall present, as a minimum, two statements of financial position, two statements
of profits or loss and other comprehensive income, two separate statements of profit or loss
(if presented), two statements of cash flows and two statements of changes in equity, and IAS 1.38 and 38A
related notes. This shall include comparative information for narrative and descriptive
information if it is relevant to understanding the current period’s financial statements.
*** In such cases, a complete set of financial statements will include three statements of financial
IAS 1.10
position.
Presentation of statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income and analysis of expenses
An entity can present a single statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, with
profit or loss and other comprehensive income in two sections or as two linked statements. IAS 1.81A
When an entity present a single statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, with
profit or loss and other comprehensive income in two sections, the sections shall be presented
together, with the profit or loss section presented first followed directly by the other
comprehensive income section. When an entity present the profit or loss section in a separate
statement of profit or loss, the separate statement of profit or loss shall immediately precede the
statement of comprehensive income, which shall begin with profit or loss.
An entity shall present an analysis of expenses using a classification based on either the nature of
expenses or their function within the entity, whichever provides information that is reliable and IAS 1.99
more relevant. The main consideration in choosing an appropriate analysis for disclosure
purposes should be the entity’s accounting system and management reporting system.
In this illustration, the format adopted is two linked statements with analysis of expenses by their
function within the entity. An illustration of a statement of comprehensive income in a single IAS 1.104
statement with analysis of expenses by their nature is provided in Appendix A-1 Consolidated
statement of comprehensive income in one statement – illustrating the analysis of expenses by
nature. Where the former format is adopted (as in the case of this illustration), the entity shall
disclose additional information on the nature of expenses, including depreciation and amortisation
as well as employee benefits expense in the notes.
Commentary (continued):
The separate reporting of continuing and discontinued operations in the statement of IFRS 5.30 and 33
comprehensive income is required only where there are discontinued operations as defined by
IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations.
An entity shall re-present the disclosures required for discontinued operations for prior periods IFRS 5.34
presented in the financial statements so that the disclosures relate to all operations that have
been discontinued by the end of the reporting period for the latest period presented.
On disposal of the disposal group, the gain or loss from discontinued operation presented on the IFRS 5.33.b.iii
statement of comprehensive income includes the gain or loss on disposal of the disposal group
constituting the discontinued operation.
Additional line items, heading and subtotals should be presented on the face of the statement of IAS 1.85
comprehensive income, when such presentation is relevant to the understanding of the entity’s
financial performance.
“Research and development” costs represent the aggregate amount of research and development IAS 38.126 and 127
expenditure recognised as an expense during the period, including amortisation of deferred
development cost.
“Share of results of associates” and “share of results of joint ventures” are presented net of tax IAS 1.IG6
and non-controlling interests in the associates and joint ventures.
Terminology used
Although IAS 1 uses the terms “other comprehensive income”, “profit or loss” and “total IAS 1.8
comprehensive income”, an entity may use other terms to describe the totals as long as the
meaning is clear. For example, an entity may use the term “net income” to describe profit or loss.
Commentary (continued):
Tax effects related to each component of other comprehensive income IAS 1.91
In this illustration, the share of other comprehensive income of associates relates to property
revaluation attributable to owners of the associates, which is an item that will not be reclassified to
profit or loss. If an entity has share of other comprehensive income of associates which relates to
items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss, the item shall be presented under the
group of items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss.
Either way, the amount of income tax relating to each component of other comprehensive
income must be disclosed either in the statement of comprehensive income or in the notes. In
this illustration, the entity has chosen to disclose the related tax effects in the Note 10 “Income
tax expense”.
Balance sheets
As at 31 December 2018
Commentary:
An entity shall disclose the amount expected to be recovered or settled after more than twelve IAS 1.61
months for each asset and liability line item that combines amounts expected to be recovered or
settled:
(a) no more than twelve months after the reporting period, and
(b) more than twelve months after the reporting period.
An entity shall present current and non-current assets, and current and non-current liabilities, as IAS 1.60
separate classifications in its balance sheets in accordance with IAS 1.66 to IAS 1.67 except when a
presentation based on liquidity provides information that is reliable and more relevant. When that
exception applies, an entity shall present all assets and liabilities in order of liquidity.
changes in equity
$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
Opening balance at 1 January
2018 (FRS framework) 2.2 68,849 66,949 9,665 - 51,627 5,657 426 4,414 740 (344) - 341 - 80 - 1,900
Cumulative effects of adopting
SFRS(I) 4,392 4,312 - - 4,118 194 (8) - - 202 - - - - - 80 IAS 1.106.b
Opening balance at 1 January
2018 (SFRS(I) framework) 73,241 71,261 9,665 - 55,745 5,851 418 4,414 740 (142) - 341 - 80 - 1980
Profit for the year 4,956 4,776 – - 4,776 - - - - - - - - - - 180 IAS 1.106.d.i
Total
r comprehensive income for
the year 6,261 6,091 - - 4,776 1,315 174 1,312 - (171) - - - – - 170 IAS 1.106.a
Contributions by and
distributions to owners IAS 1.106.d.iii
Shares issued for acquisition of a
subsidiary 33(a) 1,475 1,475 1,475 - - - - - - - - - - - - - IAS 1.106.d.iii
Share issuance expense 33(a) (50) (50) (50) - - - - - - - - - - - - - IAS 32.39
Grant of equity-settled share
options to employees 35 245 245 - - - 245 - - - - - 245 - - - - IFRS 2.50
Purchase of treasury shares 33(b) (254) (254) - (254) - - - - - - - - - - - - IAS 32.33
Treasury shares reissued
pursuant to employee share IFRS 2.50, IAS
option plans 33(b) 81 81 - 95 - (14) - - - - - (79) 65 - - - 32.33
Dividends on ordinary shares 43 (1,613) (1,613) - - (1,613) - - - - - - - - - - - IAS 1.107i
Total contributions by and
distributions to owners (116) (116) 1,425 (159) (1,613) 231 - - - - – 166 65 – - - IAS 1.106.d.iii
Acquisition of non-controlling
interests without a change in
control 17 (800) (150) - - - (150) - - - - (150) - - - - (650)
Total changes in ownership
interests in subsidiaries (242) (150) - - - (150) - - - - (150) - - - - (92) IAS 1.106.d.iii
Others
Reserve attributable to disposal
group classified as held for
sale 11 - - - - - (128) - (128) - - - - - - 128 - IFRS 5.38
The accompanying accounting policies and explanatory notes form an integral part of the financial statements.
Equity
Equity component of
attributable Foreign Employee convertible
to owners of Other Fair value Asset Statutory currency share redeemable Non-
2017 Equity, the Company, Share Retained reserves, adjustment revaluation reserve translation option preference controlling
Group Note total total capital earnings total reserve reserve fund reserve reserve shares interests
$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
Cumulative effects of adopting SFRS(I) 2,369 2,289 - 2,087 202 - - - 202 - - 80 IAS 1.106.b
Profit for the year 7,505 7,105 - 7,105 - - - - - - - 400 IAS 1.106.d.i
Total comprehensive income for the year 9,935 9,475 - 7,105 2,370 98 2,414 - (142) - - 460 IAS 1.106.a
Equity
Equity component of
attributable Foreign Employee convertible
to owners of Other Fair value Asset Statutory currency share redeemable Non-
2017 Equity, the Company, Share Retained reserves, adjustment revaluation reserve translation option preference controlling
Group Note total total capital earnings total reserve reserve fund reserve reserve shares interests
$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
Grant of equity-settled share options to employees 35 150 150 - - 150 - - - - 150 - - IFRS 2.50
Exercise of employee share options 33(a) 72 72 155 - (83) - - - - (83) - - IFRS 2.50
Others
Closing balance at 31 December 2017 73,482 71,502 9,665 55,978 5,859 426 4,414 740 (142) 341 80 1,980
The accompanying accounting policies and explanatory notes form an integral part of the financial statements.
Equity component
2018 Gain or loss on of convertible
Other reserves, Employee share reissuance of redeemable
Company Note Equity, total Share capital Treasury shares Retained earnings total option reserve treasury shares preference shares
Opening balance at 1 January 2018 (FRS framework) 24,395 9,665 - 14,309 421 341 - 80
Opening balance at 1 January 2018 (SFRS(I) framework) 24,300 9,665 - 14,214 421 341 - 80
Profit for the year, representing total comprehensive income for the IAS 1.106.d.i, IAS
year 4,069 - - 4,069 - - - - 1.106.a
Shares issued for acquisition of a subsidiary 33(a) 1,475 1,475 - - - - - - IAS 1.106.d.iii
Grant of equity-settled share options to employees 35 245 - - - 245 245 - - IFRS 2.50
Treasury shares reissued pursuant to employee share option plans 81 - 95 - (14) (79) 65 - IFRS 2.50, IAS 32.33
Total transactions with owners in their capacity as owners (116) 1,425 (159) (1,583) 201 136 65 - IAS 1.106.d.iii
Closing balance at 31 December 2018 28,253 11,090 (159) 16,700 622 477 65 80
The accompanying accounting policies and explanatory notes form an integral part of the financial statements.
Equity component
2017 Gain or loss on of convertible
Other reserves, Employee share reissuance of redeemable
Company Note Equity, total Share capital Treasury shares Retained earnings total option reserve treasury shares preference shares
Profit for the year, representing total comprehensive income for the IAS 1.106.d.i , IAS
year 2,449 - - 2,449 - - - - 1.106.a
Grant of equity-settled share options to employees 35 150 - - - 150 150 - - IFRS 2.50
Exercise of employee share options 33(a) 72 155 - - (83) (83) - - IFRS 2.50
Total transactions with owners in their capacity as owners (1,280) 155 - (1,564) 129 49 - 80 IAS 1.106.d.iii
The accompanying accounting policies and explanatory notes form an integral part of the financial statements.
Commentary:
Analysis of other comprehensive income for each component of equity in the statement of changes in equity
IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements requires an analysis of other comprehensive income for
each component of equity to be presented either in the statement of changes in equity or in the notes IAS 1.106.d.ii
to the financial statements. IAS 1.106A
In this illustration, the Group has chosen to present an analysis of other comprehensive income for
each component of equity in the statement of changes in equity.
Presentation of the statement of changes in equity for the Company when consolidated financial
statements are presented is optional. Information relating to the equity items presented in the
Company’s balance sheet may be presented in the notes to the financial statements instead.
2018 2017
Consolidated cash flow statement
Net cash flows from operating activities 6,563 5,309 IAS 7.10
2018 2017
The accompanying accounting policies and explanatory notes form an integral part of the financial statements.
In this illustration, the consolidated cash flow statement is presented using indirect method whereby IAS 7.18
profit or loss is adjusted for the effects of non-cash transactions, deferrals, accruals and investing or
financing cash flows. IAS 7.18 allows entities to report cash flows from operating activities using
either the direct method or indirect method. The cash flow from operating activities prepared using
the direct method is illustrated below:
IAS 7.App A
Group
2018 2017
$'000 $'000
Operating activities
Receipts from customers XXX XXX
Payments to suppliers and employees (XXX) (XXX)
Cash generated from operations XXX XXX
Interest paid (XXX) (XXX)
Income taxes paid (XXX) (XXX)
Net cash flows from/(used in) operating activities XXX (XXX)
The cash flow from financing and investing activities under the direct method are identical to that
prepared under indirect method.
Disposal of subsidiary
In this illustration, there is no disposal of subsidiary or other business units during the financial year. IAS 7.40.a-d
If there is such disposal, an entity should disclose:
(a) The total disposal consideration;
(b) The portion of the disposal consideration discharged by means of cash and cash equivalents;
(c) The amount of cash and cash equivalents in the subsidiary or business unit disposed of; and
(d) The amount of the assets and liabilities other than cash and cash equivalents in the subsidiary or
business unit disposed of, summarised by each major category.
IAS 7.40A
An investment entity, as defined in IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements, need not apply (c) and
(d) above to an investment in subsidiary that is required to be measured at fair value through profit or
loss.
Illustrative note disclosure:
The company disposed of XXX Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary, on 30 November 2018 at its IAS 7.40.b
carrying value. The disposal consideration was fully settled in cash.
The value of assets and liabilities of XXX Limited recorded in the consolidated financial IAS 7.40.d
statements as at 30 November 2018, and the cash flow effect of the disposal were:
$’000
Property, plant and equipment XXX
Trade and other receivables XXX
Inventories XXX
Cash and cash equivalents XXX IAS 7.40.c
XXX
Trade and other payables (XXX)
Income tax payable (XXX)
Carrying value of net assets XXX
Commentary:
In this illustration, there is no payment of contingent consideration for business combination during
the year. For illustrative disclosure of contingent consideration for business combination in the year
when the amount is paid and its impact on the presentation in the statement of cash flows, please
refer to commentary no.1 of Note 32 Other liabilities.
Foreign currency translation differences that arise on translation of foreign currency cash and cash IAS 7.28
equivalents should be reported in the consolidated cash flow statement in order to reconcile opening
and closing balances of cash and cash equivalents, separately from operating, financing and investing
cash flows.
Cash flows arising from transactions in a foreign currency shall be recorded in an entity’s functional IAS 7.25
currency by applying to the foreign currency amount the exchange rate between the functional IAS 7.26
currency and the foreign currency at the date of the cash flow. Cash flows of a foreign subsidiary
shall be translated at the exchange rates between the functional currency and the foreign currency at
the date of the cash flows. For a group entity that has overseas investments with functional currency
that is different from the presentation currency of the Group, the individual cash flow line items may
include foreign currency translation differences that should be adjusted to remove the non-cash
movement in the individual cash flow line items.
The illustrative disclosures in XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited and its subsidiaries are IAS 1.113
based on one sample format of how the notes to the financial statements can be IAS 1.114
Commentary:
1. Corporate information
XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited (the Company) is a limited liability company IAS 1.138.a and c
IAS 24.13
incorporated and domiciled in Singapore and is listed on the Singapore Exchange. The CA 201.10
immediate and ultimate holding company is Good Group (International) Ltd.
The registered office and principal place of business of the Company is located at Level IAS 1.138.a
18, One Raffles Quay, North Tower, 048583, Singapore.
The principal activity of the Company is investment holding. The principal activities of the IAS 1.138.b
subsidiaries, associates and joint venture are disclosed in Note 17 to 19 to the financial
statements.
Commentary:
Disclosures required by IAS 1.138
The following information may be provided in the notes to the financial statements or IAS 1.138
disclosed elsewhere in information published with the financial statements:
- the domicile and legal form of the entity, its country of incorporation and the address of
its registered office (or principal place of business, if different from the registered
office);
- a description of the nature of the entity’s operations and its principal activities; and
- the name of the parent and ultimate parent of the Group.
Disclosures of name of the ultimate controlling party
IAS 24.13
IAS 24 requires an entity to disclose the name of the entity’s parent and, if different, the
ultimate controlling party. The ultimate controlling party can be either an entity or a person.
If neither the entity’s parent nor the ultimate controlling party produces consolidated
financial statements available for public use, the name of the next most senior parent that
does so shall also be disclosed.
The consolidated financial statements of the Group and the balance sheet and IAS 1.16, IAS 1-
1.51.b, IAS
statement of changes in equity of the Company have been prepared in accordance with
1.112.a
Singapore Financial Reporting Standards (International) (SFRS(I)). SGX 1207.5.d
For all periods up to and including the year ended 31 December 2017, the Group
prepared its financial statements in accordance with Financial Reporting Standards in
Singapore (FRS). These financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2018 are
the first the Group has prepared in accordance with SFRS(I). Refer to Note 2.2 for
information on how the Group adopted SFRS(I).
The financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis except as IAS 1.117.a
disclosed in the accounting policies below.
The financial statements are presented in Singapore Dollars (SGD or $) and all values IAS 1.51.d and e
in the tables are rounded to the nearest thousand ($’000), except when otherwise
indicated.
Commentary:
When preparing financial statements, management shall make an assessment of an IAS 1.25
IAS 1.122
entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. Where the effect of the judgement made in
relation to the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern has significant effect on the
amounts recognised in the financial statements, the judgement made should be disclosed.
Financial statements shall be prepared on a going concern basis unless management IAS 1-1.25
either intends to liquidate the entity or to cease trading, or has no realistic alternative but
to do so. When management is aware, in making its assessment, of material uncertainties
related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the entity’s ability to
continue as a going concern, those uncertainties shall be disclosed.
When the presentation currency is different from the functional currency of the Company, IAS 21.53
that fact shall be stated, together with disclosure of the functional currency and the
reasons for using a different presentation currency.
Illustrative disclosure where the ability of the company to continue as a going concern is
dependent on the holding company undertaking to provide continuing financial support to
the company to enable it to continue as a going concern:
The Company incurred a net loss of $XXX (2017: $XXX) during the financial year
ended 31 December 2018 and as at that date, the Company’s current and total
liabilities exceeded its current and total assets by $XXX (2017: $XXX) and $XXX
(2017: $XXX) respectively. These factors indicate the existence of a material
uncertainty which may cast significant doubt about the Company’s ability to continue
as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern
depends on the holding company undertaking to provide continuing financial support
to enable the Company to continue as a going concern.
If the Company is unable to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable
future, the Company may be unable to discharge its liabilities in the normal course of
business and adjustments may have to be made to reflect the situation that assets
may need to be realised other than in the normal course of business and at amounts
which could differ significantly from the amounts at which they are currently recorded
in the balance sheet. In addition, the Company may have to reclassify non-current
assets and liabilities as current assets and liabilities. No such adjustments have been
made to these financial statements.
2.2 First-time adoption of Singapore Financial Reporting Standards (International) IAS 8.28
(SFRS(I))
These financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2018 are the first the
Group and the Company have prepared in accordance with SFRS(I). Accordingly, the
Group and the Company have prepared financial statements that comply with SFRS(I)
applicable as at 31 December 2018, together with the comparative period data for the
year ended 31 December 2017, as described in the summary of significant accounting
policies. On preparing the financial statements, the Group’s and the Company’s
opening balance sheets were prepared as at 1 January 2017, the Group and the
Company’s date of transition to SFRS(I).
The principal adjustments made by the Group on adoption of SFRS(I) and the adoption
of the new standards that are effective on 1 January 2018 are disclosed below.
Commentary:
IFRS 1.21 requires an entity’s first IFRS financial statements to include at least three
statements of financial position, two statements of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income, two statements of cash flows and two statements of changes in
equity and related notes, including comparative information for all statements
presented.
IFRS 1.E1 and E2 Exemptions from the requirement to restate comparative information
for IFRS 9 allows the comparative information in the entity’s first IFRS financial
statements need not comply with IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosure to the extent
that the disclosures required by IFRS 7 relate to items within the scope of IFRS 9.
Entities applying the exemption would apply the requirements of its previous GAAP to
financial instruments up to the financial year ended 31 December 2017.
Commentary:
Standards effective for annual period beginning on or after 1 January 2018
The following Standards and Interpretations are effective for the annual period
beginning on or after 1 January 2018:
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Improvements to IFRSs (December 2016)
Amendments to IAS 28 Measuring an Associate or Joint Venture at Fair Value
Amendments to IFRS 2 Classification and Measurement of Share-based Payment
Transactions
Amendments to IAS 40 Transfers of Investment Property
IFRS INT 22 Foreign Currency Transactions and Advance Considerations
IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors requires the
disclosure of the amount of the adjustment for the current period and each prior period
(to the extent practicable) upon initial application of a Standard or an Interpretation.
cost if it also meets the SPPI requirement. Debt instruments that meet the SPPI
requirement that are held both to collect the assets’ contractual cash flows and to sell IFRS 9.4.1.2A
the assets are measured at FVOCI. Financial assets are measured at FVPL if they do
not meet the criteria of FVOCI or amortised cost.
The assessment of the business model and whether the financial assets meet the SPPI IFRS 1.B8
requirements was made as of 1 January 2018, and then applied retropectively to those
financial assets that were not derecognied before 1 January 2018.
The Group’s debt instruments have contractual cash flows that are solely payments of
principal and interest. The Group has a mixed business model. Debt instruments that
were measured at amortised cost previously are held to collect contractual cash flows,
and accordingly measured at amortised cost under SFRS(I) 9. For debt instruments
that were measured at FVOCI previously, the Group’s business model is to hold the
debt instrument to collect contractual cash flows and sell, and accordingly measured at
FVOCI when it applies SFRS(I) 9. There is no significant impact arising from
measurement of these instruments under SFRS(I) 9.
SFRS(I) 9 requires all equity instruments to be carried at fair value through profit or
loss, unless an entity chooses on initial recognition, to present fair value changes in
other comprehensive income.
For equity securities, the Group continues to measure its currently held-for-trading
equity securities and one of its available-for-sale (AFS) quoted equity securities at
FVPL. The Group elects to measure its currently held AFS unquoted equity securities at
FVOCI. As a result of the change in measurement of the Group’s quoted equity
securities previously measured at FVOCI to FVPL, the fair value adjustment reserve of
$80,000 related to those investments that were previously presented under the fair
value adjustment reserve were transferred to retained earnings as at 1 January 2018.
The Group has assessed which business model apply to the financial assets held by the Group at 1 January 2018 and has classified its financial instruments
into the appropriate categories in accordance with SFRS(I) 9. The effects, before tax impact are as follows:
IFRS 7.42I and J
Financial assets: Group IFRS 7.42O
The initial application of SFRS(I) 9 does not have any reclassification effect to the Company’s financial statements.
The reconciliation for loss allowances for the Group are as follow:
Group
The reconciliation for loss allowances for the Company are as follow:
Company
Loans to Financial
subsidiaries, guarantees
associates and
fellow subsidiaries
carried at
amortised cost
$’000 $’000
Commentary
IFRS 1.E1
In this illustration, the Group has elected to apply the exemption under E1 of IFRS 1
which allows entity not to comply with IFRS 7 and IFRS 9, to the extent that the
disclosures required by IFRS 7 relate to items within the scope of IFRS 9, in the first year
of transition to IFRS.
In this illustration, the Group does not have any financial assets and financial liabilities
that were previously designated and measured at fair value through profit or loss but are
no longer so designated at the date of initial application of IFRS 9.
If an entity has any financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value through profit or
loss but are no longer so designated at the date of initial application of IFRS 9, the entity
is required to disclose
(i) the amount of these financial assets and financial liabilities, distinguishing between IFRS 7.42I.c
those that IFRS 9 requires an entity to reclassify and those that an entity elects to
reclassify at the date of initial application.
(ii) the effective interest rate determined on the date of initial application IFRS 7.42N.a
(iii) the interest revenue or expense recognised IFRS 7.42N.b
The disclosures in item (ii) and (iii) shall be made for each reporting period until IFRS 7.42N
derecognition if the fair value of a financial asset or a financial liability is treated as the
new gross carrying amount at the date of initial application. Otherwise, the disclosures
need not be made after the annual reporting period in which the entity initially applies
IFRS 9.
In this illustration, the Group does not have any financial assets and financial liabilities IFRS 7.42M
that have been reclassified so that they are measured at amortised cost and, in the case
of financial assets, that have been reclassified out of fair value through profit or loss so
that they are measured at fair value through other comprehensive income, as a result of
transition to IFRS 9.
If an entity has such reclassifications, IFRS 7 requires the disclosures of
(i) The fair value of the financial assets or financial liabilities at the end of the reporting
IFRS 7.42M.a
period; and
(ii) The fair value gain or loss that would have been recognised in profit or loss or other IFRS 7.42M.b
comprehensive income during the reporting period if the financial assets or financial
liabilities had not been reclassified.
Commentary
Modified retrospective approach
In this illustration, the Group applied the full retrospective approach as the Group is a
first-time adopter of SFRS(I) (equivalent to IFRS). Application of the modified
retrospective approach is not an available option for first-time adopter of IFRS.
For existing IFRS reporters, IFRS 15 allows two transition method, the full retrospective
approach and the modified retrospective approach.
If the Group had elected to apply the modified retrospective approach, it would apply IFRS 15.C7
IFRS 15 retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying IFRS 15
recognised at the date of initial application as an adjustment to the opening balance of
retained earnings of the annual reporting period that includes the date of initial
application (i.e. 1 January 2018).
This means that the comparative information in the statement of financial position is
not restated. As such, both the pre-IFRS 15 (i.e. IAS 11, IAS 18 and the related
interpretations) and IFRS 15 accounting policies need to be disclosed.
Under this approach,
The Group may elect to apply IFRS 15 retrospectively only to contracts that are IFRS 15.C7
not completed contracts at the date of initial application.
The Group may elect to use the practical expedient on contract modifications IFRS 15.C7A
similar to that in the full retrospective approach, either for all contract
modifications that occur (i) before the beginning of the earliest period presented,
or (ii) before the date of initial application.
The Group is required to provide the following additional disclosures:
IFRS 15.C8
(a) the amount by which each financial statement line item is affected in the
current reporting year by the application of IFRS 15 as compared to the pre-
IFRS 15 standards; and
(b) an explanation of the reasons for significant changes identified in (a).
The following is the reconciliation of the impact arising from first-time adoption of IFRS 1.24.a.i
SFRS(I) including application of the new accounting standards on 1 January 2017 to
the balance sheet of the Group.
Group
1 January SFRS(I) 1 SFRS(I) 15 1 January
2017 adjustments adjustments 2017
(FRS) (SFRS(I))
$'000 $’000 $’000 $’000
Assets
Non-current assets
Other non-current assets 45,965 - - 45,965
Investment in joint venture 1,370 - (6) 1,364
Investment in associates 10,125 - (26) 10,099
57,460 - (32) 57,428
Current assets
Gross amount due from customers
for work-in-progress 67 - (67) -
Development properties 2,450 - (784) 1,666
Inventories 25,300 - (764) 24,536
Right of return assets - - 856 856
Contract assets - - 3,269 3,269
Capitalised contract costs - - 490 490
Other current assets 27,233 - - 27,233
55,050 - 3,000 58,050
Total assets 112,510 - 2,968 115,478
Equity and liabilities
Current liabilities
Income tax payable 6,362 - (363) 5,999
Trade and other payables 18,367 - (2,879) 15,488
Gross amount due to customers for
work-in-progress 942 - (942) -
Contract liabilities - - 1,255 1,255
Refund liabilities - - 3,796 3,796
Other current liabilities 5,722 - - 5,722
31,393 - 867 32,260
Non-current liabilities
Provisions 1,898 - (268) 1,630
Deferred tax liabilities 1,517 - - 1,517
Other non-current liabilities 15,244 - - 15,244
18,659 - (268) 18,391
Total liabilities 50,052 - 599 50,651
Equity attributable to owners of the
Company
Share capital 9,510 - - 9,510
Retained earnings 48,477 (202) 2,289 50,564
Other reserves 3,031 202 - 3,233
61,018 - 2,289 63,307
Non-controlling interests 1,440 - 80 1,520
Total equity 62,458 - 2,369 64,827
Total equity and liabilities 112,510 - 2,968 115,478
The following is the reconciliation of the impact arising from first-time adoption of IFRS 1.24.a
Group
31 December SFRS(I) 1 SFRS(I) 15 31 December SFRS(I) 9 1 January
2017 adjustments adjustments 2017 adjustments 2018
(FRS) (SFRS(I)) (SFRS(I))
$'000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
Assets
Non-current assets
Other non-current assets 42,548 - - 42,548 - 42,548
Investment in joint venture 1,523 - (8) 1,515 (2) 1,513
Investment in associates 10,321 - (30) 10,291 (3) 10,288
Other receivables 2,815 - - 2,815 (37) 2,778
Investment securities 3,106 - - 3,106 55 3,161
60,313 - (38) 60,275 13 60,288
Current assets
Gross amount due from
customers for work-in-
progress 398 - (398) - - -
Development properties 3,150 - (1,422) 1,728 - 1,728
Inventories 23,900 - (1,258) 22,642 - 22,642
Right of return assets - - 1,285 1,285 - 1,285
Trade and other receivables 24,930 - 24,930 (293) 24,637
Contract assets - - 6,928 6,928 (15) 6,913
Capitalised contract costs - - 690 690 - 690
Investment securities 1,260 - - 1,260 - 1,260
Other current assets 5,213 - - 5,213 - 5,213
58,851 - 5,825 64,676 (318) 64,368
Total assets 119,164 - 5,787 124,951 (295) 124,656
Equity and liabilities -
Current liabilities
Income tax payable 6,734 - (317) 6,417 (67) 6,350
Trade and other payables 18,934 - (3,969) 14,965 - 14,965
Gross amount due to
customers for work-in-
progress 586 - (586) - - -
Contract liabilities - - 1,309 1,309 - 1,309
Refund liabilities - - 5,333 5,333 - 5,333
Other liabilities 2,579 - - 2,579 2 2,581
Other current liabilities 2,795 - - 2,795 - 2,795
31,628 - 1,770 33,398 (65) 33,333
Non-current liabilities
Provisions 1,841 - (616) 1,225 - 1,225
Deferred tax liabilities 1,904 - - 1,904 11 1,915
Other non-current liabilities 14,942 - - 14,942 - 14,942
18,687 - (616) 18,071 11 18,082
Total liabilities 50,315 - 1,154 51,469 (54) 51,415
Equity attributable to owners
of the Company
Share capital 9,665 - - 9,665 - 9,665
Retained earnings 51,627 (202) 4,553 56,978 (233) 55,745
Other reserves 5,657 202 - 5,859 (8) 5,851
66,949 - 4,553 71,502 (241) 71,261
Non-controlling interests 1,900 - 80 1,980 - 1,980
Total equity 68,849 - 4,633 73,482 (241) 73,241
Total equity and liabilities 119,164 - 5,787 124.951 (295) 124,656
The following is the reconciliation of the impact arising from first-time adoption of IFRS 1.24.a
Company
31 December 3017 SFRS(I) 9 1 January 2018
(FRS) adjustments (SFRS(I))
$'000 $’000 $’000
Assets
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 603 - 603
Investment in subsidiaries 10,582 - 10,582
Deferred tax assets 26 26
Other receivables 17,401 (103) 17,298
28,612 (103) 28,509
Current assets
Prepaid operating expenses 122 - 122
Trade and other receivables 350 - 350
Cash and short-term deposits 4,145 - 4,145
4,617 - 4,617
Total assets 33,229 (103) 33,126
Equity and liabilities
Current liabilities
Income tax payable 2,115 (18) 2,097
Trade and other payables 414 - 414
Other liabilities 446 10 456
2,975 (8) 2,967
Non-current liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities 231 - 231
Loans and borrowings 5,628 - 5,628
5,859 - 5,859
Total liabilities 8,834 (8) 8,826
Equity attributable to owners of the
Company
Share capital 9,665 - 9,665
Retained earnings 14,309 (95) 14,214
Other reserves 421 - 421
Total equity 24,395 (95) 24,300
Total equity and liabilities 33,229 (95) 33,126
The following is the reconciliation of the impact arising from first-time adoption of IFRS 1.24.a
SFRS(I) and application of the new accounting standards to the comprehensive income
the Group for the year ended 31 December 2017.
2017 SFRS(I) 15 2017
(FRS) adjustments (SFRS(I))
$’000 $’000 $’000
Continuing operations
Commentary:
Standards issued but not yet effective
In this illustration, the adoption of SFRS(I) INT 23 does not have any impact to the
Group.
The following are illustrative disclosures for impact of adoption of SFRS(I) 23 on
scenario where it is not probable that tax authority would accept the Group’s tax
treatment.
SFRS(I) INT 23, effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019,
addresses accounting for income taxes when tax treatments are uncertain.
Where there are uncertain tax treatments for which it is not probable that the tax
authority will accept the Group’s tax treatment, the Group is required to reflect the
effect of the uncertainty in determining the tax liability to be recorded. The effects
of the uncertainty are reflected using either of the following methods, depending on
which method the Group expects to better predict the resolution of the uncertainty:
the most likely amount of the expected value.
The Group has significant open tax assessment with a tax authority where the Group
has provided for income taxes of $XXX as at 31 December 2018. Upon adoption of
the interpretations as at 1 January 2019, the Group has assessed that it is not
probable that the tax authority will accept the Group’s tax treatment based on tax
advice and recent case laws. Accordingly, the Group re-measures the uncertain tax
positions based on SFRS(I) INT 23 by using the expected value method, which
provides better prediction of the resolution of the uncertainty. Upon adoption of
SFRS(I) INT 23 on 1 January 2019, the Group expects to recognise an increase in
income tax payables of $XXX with a corresponding decrease in retained earnings.
Except for SFRS(I) 16, the directors expect that the adoption of the other standards
above will have no material impact on the financial statements in the year of initial
application. The nature of the impending changes in accounting policy on adoption of
SFRS(I) 16 are described below.
The disclosures relating to standards issued but not yet effective below are
based on the specific circumstances of XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited and
may not be applicable or relevant to other entities. Each entity should customise
the information disclosed according to the specific circumstances.
SFRS(I) 16 Leases
SFRS(I) 16 requires lessees to recognise most leases on balance sheets. The standard
includes two recognition exemptions for lessees – leases of ‘low value’ assets and
short-term leases. SFRS(I) 16 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1
January 2019. At commencement date of a lease, a lessee will recognise a liability to
make a lease payments (i.e. the lease liability) and an asset representing the right to
use the underlying asset during the lease term (i.e. the right-of-use asset). Lessees will
be required to separately recognise the interest expense on the lease liability and the
depreciation expense on the right-of-use asset.
IFRS 16.C5
The Group plans to adopt SFRS(I) 16 retrospectively with the cumulative effect of
initially applying the standard as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings at the
date of initial application, 1 January 2019.
IFRS 16.C8
On the adoption of SFRS(I) 16, the Group expects to choose, on a lease-by-lease basis,
to measure the right-of-use asset at either:
(i) its carrying amount as if SFRS(I) 16 had been applied since the commencement
date, but discounted using the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate as of 1 January
2019; or
(ii) an amount equal to the lease liability, adjusted by the amount of any prepaid or
accrued lease payments relating to that lease recognised in the statement of
financial position immediately before 1 January 2019.
In addition, the Group plans to elect the following practical expedients: IFRS 16.C3
IFRS 16.C10
not to reassess whether a contract is, or contains a lease at the date of initial
application and to apply SFRS(I) 16 to all contracts that were previously
identified as leases
to apply the exemption not to recognise right-of-use asset and lease liabilities
to leases for which the lease term ends within 12 months as of 1 January
2019
to apply a single discount rate to a portfolio of leases with reasonably similar
characteristics
The Group has performed a preliminary impact assessment based on currently
available information, and the assessment may be subject to changes arising from
ongoing analysis until the Group adopts SFRS(I) 16 in 2019.
On the adoption of SFRS(I) 16, the Group expects to recognise right-of-use assets of
$908,000 and lease liabilities of $924,000 for its leases previously classified as
operating leases, with a corresponding decrease in the opening retained earnings of
$16,000 and its related tax impact as of 1 January 2019. In addition, the Group will
present land use rights of $5,811,000 as right-of-use assets as of 1 January 2019.
Commentary:
IFRS 16 transition provisions
The transition requirements in IFRS 16 allows an entity to choose either the full
retrospective approach, or the modified retrospective approach for leases which it is the
lessee. The election is to be applied consistently to all of its leases.
In this illustration, the Group plans to apply a modified retrospective approach. The
disclosure should be tailored accordingly if an entity plans to apply the full retrospective
approach, to adjust the opening balance of each affected component of equity for the
earliest prior period presented and the other comparative amounts for each prior period
presented as if the entity has always applied the requirements of the new standard.
In this illustration, it is assumed that the Group does not have subleases. If there is an
impact arising from the change in the lessor accounting for subleases, the expected
impact should be disclosed accordingly.
In this illustration, it is assumed that the effects of adoption of IFRS 16 does not result in
adjustment to other items in the financial statements such as prepaid or accrued rents.
If there is any impact to such line items in the financial statements, the amount of
adjustment for the affected line items in the financial statements should be disclosed
accordingly.
Notes to users:
The summary of significant accounting policies in this illustration are based on assumed
circumstances of XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited and may not be relevant to all entities. Each
entity should customise the significant accounting policies disclosed according to the specific
circumstances relevant to the entity.
a) Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of IFRS 10.4
the Company and its subsidiaries as at the end of the reporting period. The IFRS 10.Appendix A
IFRS 10.B92
financial statements of the subsidiaries used in the preparation of the
consolidated financial statements are prepared for the same reporting date as
the Company. Consistent accounting policies are applied to like transactions IFRS 10.19 and B87
and events in similar circumstances.
All intra-group balances, income and expenses and unrealised gains and losses IFRS 10.B86.c
resulting from intra-group transactions and dividends are eliminated in full.
Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date of acquisition, being the date on IFRS 10.20 and B88
which the Group obtains control, and continue to be consolidated until the
date that such control ceases.
Losses within a subsidiary are attributed to the non-controlling interest even if IFRS 10.B94
that results in a deficit balance.
combination is, from the acquisition date, allocated to the Group’s cash-
generating units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the
combination.
IAS 36.90
The cash-generating units to which goodwill have been allocated is tested for
impairment annually and whenever there is an indication that the cash-
generating unit may be impaired. Impairment is determined for goodwill by
assessing the recoverable amount of each cash-generating unit (or group of
cash-generating units) to which the goodwill relates.
Commentary:
Investment entities
IFRS 10 provides exception to the consolidation requirement for entities that meet the
definition of an investment entity. The exception to consolidation requires investment
entities to account for subsidiaries at fair value through profit or loss in accordance with
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments.
Please refer to commentary no.9 in Note 17 Investment in subsidiaries for disclosure
requirements.
The financial statements of the parent and its subsidiaries used in the preparation of the IFRS 10.B92
consolidated financial statements shall be prepared as of the same reporting date. When
the end of the reporting period of the parent is different from that of a subsidiary, the
subsidiary prepares, for consolidation purposes, additional financial statements as of the
same date as the financial statements of the parent, unless it is impracticable to do so.
Where it is impracticable to do so, the parent may use the financial statements of a
IFRS 10.B93
subsidiary prepared as of a reporting date different from that of the parent, provided
adjustments are made for the effects of significant transactions or events that occur
between that date and the date of the parent’s financial statements, and the difference
between the reporting dates of the subsidiary and parent is no more than three months.
In addition, the length of the reporting periods and any difference in the reporting dates
shall be the same from period to period.
When the financial statements of a subsidiary used in the preparation of consolidated IFRS 12.11
financial statements are as of a date or for a period that is different from that of the
consolidated financial statements, an entity shall disclose the date of the end of the
reporting period of the financial statements of that subsidiary and the reason for using a
different date or period.
Commentary:
Measurement of non-controlling interest
IFRS 3 provides acquirers with the option of measuring non-controlling interest arising in
IFRS 3.19
a business combination that are present ownership interests and entitle their holders to a
proportionate share of net assets of the subsidiary in the event of liquidation at either:
- Fair value; or
- The non-controlling interest’s proportionate interest in the acquiree’s identifiable net
assets.
The option is elected for each individual business combination and does not constitute an
accounting policy choice for similar transactions. Selecting the option will require
management to carefully consider their future intentions regarding transactions with
non-controlling interest, since the two options, combined with the revisions to accounting
for changes in ownership interest of a subsidiary will potentially result in significantly
different amounts of goodwill and equity.
Goodwill
IAS 36 Impairment of Assets permits annual impairment test for goodwill and intangible IAS 36.96
assets with indefinite useful lives to be performed at any time during the year provided it
is at the same time each year. Different goodwill and intangible assets may be tested at
different times.
Non-controlling interest represents the equity in subsidiaries not attributable, directly IFRS
or indirectly, to owners of the Company. 10.Appendix A
Changes in the Company’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in a IFRS 10.22
loss of control are accounted for as equity transactions. In such circumstances, the
carrying amounts of the controlling and non-controlling interests are adjusted to
reflect the changes in their relative interests in the subsidiary. Any difference between
the amount by which the non-controlling interest is adjusted and the fair value of the
IFRS 10.23
consideration paid or received is recognised directly in equity and attributed to owners IFRS 10.B96
of the Company.
In this illustration, the Group does not have partial disposal of foreign
operation.
Illustrative accounting policy for foreign currency for partial disposal of foreign
operation.
In the case of a partial disposal without loss of control of a subsidiary that IAS 21.48C
includes a foreign operation, the proportionate share of the cumulative
amount of the exchange differences are re-attributed to non-controlling
interest and are not recognised in profit or loss.
For partial disposals of associates or jointly controlled entities that are
foreign operations, the proportionate share of the accumulated exchange
differences is reclassified to profit or loss.
In this illustration, the Group does not have exchange differences arising from
monetary items that form part of the Group’s net investment in foreign
operation.
Illustrative accounting policy for exchange differences arising from monetary
items that form part of the Group’s net investment in foreign operation.
Exchange differences arising on monetary items that form part of the IAS 21.32 and 48
Group’s net investment in foreign operations are recognised initially in
other comprehensive income and accumulated under foreign currency
translation reserve in equity. The foreign currency translation reserve is
reclassified from equity to profit or loss of the Group on disposal of the
foreign operation.
All items of property, plant and equipment are initially recorded at cost. Subsequent to IAS 16.15 and 16
IAS 16.30
recognition, property, plant and equipment other than freehold land and buildings are
measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment
losses.
IAS 16.31 and
Freehold land and buildings are measured at fair value less accumulated depreciation 73.a
on buildings and impairment losses recognised after the date of the revaluation.
Valuations are performed with sufficient regularity to ensure that the carrying amount
does not differ materially from the fair value of the freehold land and buildings at the
end of the reporting period.
Any revaluation surplus is recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated IAS 16.39
in equity under the asset revaluation reserve, except to the extent that it reverses a
revaluation decrease of the same asset previously recognised in profit or loss, in which
case the increase is recognised in profit or loss. A revaluation deficit is recognised in IAS 16.40
profit or loss, except to the extent that it offsets an existing surplus on the same asset
carried in the asset revaluation reserve.
Any accumulated depreciation as at the revaluation date is eliminated against the IAS 16.35.b
gross carrying amount of the asset and the net amount is restated to the revalued
amount of the asset. The revaluation surplus included in the asset revaluation IAS 16.41
reserve in respect of an asset is transferred directly to retained earnings on retirement
or disposal of the asset.
Freehold land has an unlimited useful life and therefore is not depreciated. IAS 16.73.b and c
IAS 36.9
Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the
assets as follows:
- Buildings: 40 years
- Plant and equipment: 3 to 15 years
- Furniture and fixtures: 5 to 20 years
Assets under construction included in plant and equipment are not depreciated as
these assets are not yet available for use.
The residual value, useful life and depreciation method are reviewed at each financial IAS 16.51
year-end, and adjusted prospectively, if appropriate. IAS 16.61
Commentary:
When an item of property, plant and equipment is revalued, any accumulated IAS 16.35.a
depreciation at the date of the revaluation may instead be restated proportionately with
the change in the gross carrying amount of the asset so that the carrying amount of the
asset after revaluation equals its revalued amount. This method is often used when an
asset is revalued by means of applying an index to its depreciated replacement cost.
Alternatively, the entity may adopt a policy to make an annual transfer of the revaluation
IAS 16.41
surplus to retained earnings as the asset is used. In such a case, the amount of the
surplus transferred would be the difference between depreciation based on the revalued
carrying amount of the asset and depreciation based on the asset’s original cost.
Subsequent to initial recognition, investment properties are measured at fair value. IAS 40.33
Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair values of investment properties are IAS 40.35
included in profit or loss in the year in which they arise.
Commentary:
Investment properties
Judgement is needed to determine whether a property qualifies as investment property. IAS 40.14 and 75.c
When classification is difficult, the entity should disclose the criteria developed by the entity
so that it can exercise that judgement consistently in accordance with the definition of
investment property.
Alternatively, the entity may adopt the cost model which is to measure investment IAS 40.30 and 56
properties at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. In
these circumstances, disclosure about the cost basis and depreciation rates would be
required. This option is not available if the entity accounts for property interest held under
an operating lease as investment property.
IAS 40.34
In addition, for any investment properties recorded at cost, IAS 40 requires disclosure
about the fair value, including disclosures about the methods and significant assumptions
used to determine the fair value. Therefore, companies would still need to determine the
fair value of the investment properties. In the exceptional cases when an entity cannot
measure the fair value of investment properties reliably, it shall disclose:
(a) a description of the investment properties;
(b) an explanation of why fair value cannot be measured reliably; and
(c) if possible, the range of estimate within which fair value is highly likely to lie.
Intangible assets acquired separately are measured initially at cost. Following initial IAS 38.24
IAS 38.33
acquisition, intangible assets are carried at cost less any accumulated amortisation
and any accumulated impairment losses. Internally generated intangible assets,
excluding capitalised development costs, are not capitalised and expenditure is IAS 38.74
reflected in profit or loss in the year in which the expenditure is incurred.
IAS 38.88
The useful lives of intangible assets are assessed as either finite or indefinite.
Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortised over the estimated useful lives IAS 38.97 and
118.b
and assessed for impairment whenever there is an indication that the intangible asset IAS 36.9
may be impaired. The amortisation period and the amortisation method are reviewed
at least at each financial year-end. Changes in the expected useful life or the expected IAS 38.104
pattern of consumption of future economic benefits embodied in the asset is
accounted for by changing the amortisation period or method, as appropriate, and are
treated as changes in accounting estimates.
Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives or not yet available for use are tested for IAS 36.10.a
impairment annually , or more frequently if the events and circumstances indicate IAS 36.9
that the carrying value may be impaired either individually or at the cash-generating
unit level. Such intangible assets are not amortised. The useful life of an intangible
IAS 38.107
asset with an indefinite useful life is reviewed annually to determine whether the useful
IAS 38.109
life assessment continues to be supportable. If not, the change in useful life from
indefinite to finite is made on a prospective basis.
a) Brands
The brands were acquired in business combinations. The useful lives of the IAS 38.118.a
IAS 38.122.a
brands are estimated to be indefinite because based on the current market
share of the brands, management believes there is no foreseeable limit to the
period over which the brands are expected to generate net cash inflows for
the Group.
b) Research and development costs
Research costs are expensed as incurred. Deferred development costs arising IAS 38.54
from development expenditures on an individual project are recognised as an IAS 38.57
intangible asset when the Group can demonstrate the technical feasibility of
completing the intangible asset so that it will be available for use or sale, its
intention to complete and its ability to use or sell the asset, how the asset will
generate future economic benefits, the availability of resources to complete
and the ability to measure reliably the expenditures during the development.
Following initial recognition of the deferred development costs as an IAS 38.74
intangible asset, it is carried at cost less accumulated amortisation and any
accumulated impairment losses. Amortisation of the intangible asset begins
when development is complete and the asset is available for use. Deferred
development costs have a finite useful life and are amortised over the period
IAS 38.118.a and b
of expected sales from the related project (ranging from 4 to 8 years) on a
straight line basis.
b) Club membership
Club membership was acquired separately and is amortised on a straight line IAS 38.118.a and b
basis over its finite useful life of 10 years.
Commentary:
Intangible assets
IAS 38.75
Alternatively, the entity may adopt the revaluation model which is to measure intangible
assets at fair value less accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses.
This option is only available if the fair value can be determined by reference to an active
market.
Please refer to commentary no.4 of Note 2.4 Business combinations and goodwill.
Land use rights are initially measured at cost. Following initial recognition, land use
rights are measured at cost less accumulated amortisation. The land use rights are
amortised on a straight-line basis over the lease term of 50 years.
Commentary:
Long-term land-use rights are leases under the definition of IAS 17. In this illustration, it
is assumed that the lease does not transfer substantially all the risks and rewards IAS 17.8
incidental to ownership of the land. Therefore, the lease is an operating lease and the
payments made on acquiring the land-use right represent prepaid lease payments.
The Group assesses at each reporting date whether there is an indication that an asset IAS 36.9
may be impaired. If any indication exists, or when an annual impairment testing for an
asset is required, the Group makes an estimate of the asset’s recoverable amount.
An asset’s recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s or cash-generating unit’s fair IAS 36.18 and 22
value less costs of disposal and its value in use and is determined for an individual
asset, unless the asset does not generate cash inflows that are largely independent of
those from other assets or groups of assets. Where the carrying amount of an asset or IAS 36.59
cash-generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset is considered impaired
and is written down to its recoverable amount.
Impairment losses are recognised in profit or loss, except for assets that are IAS 36.60
previously revalued where the revaluation was taken to other comprehensive income.
In this case, the impairment is also recognised in other comprehensive income up to
the amount of any previous revaluation.
A previously recognised impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in IAS 36.114
the estimates used to determine the asset’s recoverable amount since the last
impairment loss was recognised. If that is the case, the carrying amount of the asset is
increased to its recoverable amount. That increase cannot exceed the carrying amount
that would have been determined, net of depreciation, had no impairment loss been IAS 36.117
recognised previously. Such reversal is recognised in profit or loss unless the asset is
measured at revalued amount, in which case the reversal is treated as a revaluation IAS 36.119
increase. Impairment losses relating to goodwill cannot be reversed in future periods.
2.12 Subsidiaries
IFRS 10.6
A subsidiary is an investee that is controlled by the Group. The Group controls an
investee when it is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with
the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the
investee.
IAS 27.17.c
In the Company’s balance sheet, investments in subsidiaries are accounted for at cost
less impairment losses.
Commentary:
Subsidiaries
Alternatively, the entity may choose to account for its investment in subsidiary in IAS 27.10.b
accordance with IFRS 9 Financial Instruments or using the equity method. The same
accounting must be applied for all investments in subsidiaries.
A joint arrangement is a contractual arrangement whereby two or more parties have IFRS 11.4
joint control. Joint control is the contractually agreed sharing of control of an IFRS 11.7
arrangement, which exists only when decisions about the relevant activities require
the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control.
A joint arrangement is classified either as joint operation or joint venture, based on the IFRS 11.14
rights and obligations of the parties to the arrangement.
To the extent the joint arrangement provides the Group with rights to the assets and IFRS 11.15
obligations for the liabilities relating to the arrangement, the arrangement is a joint
operation. To the extent the joint arrangement provides the Group with rights to the
IFRS 11.16
net assets of the arrangement, the arrangement is a joint venture.
a) Joint operations
The Group recognises in relation to its interest in a joint operation, IFRS 11.20
(a) its assets, including its share of any assets held jointly;
(b) its liabilities, including its share of any liabilities incurred jointly;
(c) its revenue from the sale of its share of the output arising from the joint
operation;
(d) its share of the revenue from the sale of the output by the joint operation; and
(e) its expenses, including its share of any expenses incurred jointly.
The Group accounts for the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses relating to its IFRS 11.21
interest in a joint operation in accordance with the accounting policies applicable
to the particular assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.
b) Joint ventures
The Group recognises its interest in a joint venture as an investment and accounts IFRS 12.24
for the investment using the equity method. The accounting policy for investment
in joint venture is set out in Note 2.14.
An associate is an entity over which the Group has the power to participate in the IAS 28.3
financial and operating policy decisions of the investee but does not have control or
joint control of those policies.
The Group account for its investments in associates and joint ventures using the equity IAS 28.16
IAS 28.32
method from the date on which it becomes an associate or joint venture.
On acquisition of the investment, any excess of the cost of the investment over the IAS 28.32
Group’s share of the net fair value of the investee’s identifiable assets and liabilities
represents goodwill and is included in the carrying amount of the investment. Any
excess of the Group’s share of the net fair value of the investee’s identifiable assets
and liabilities over the cost of the investment is included as income in the
determination of the entity’s share of the associate or joint venture’s profit or loss in
the period in which the investment is acquired.
Under the equity method, the investment in associates or joint ventures are carried in IAS 28.10
the balance sheet at cost plus post-acquisition changes in the Group’s share of net
assets of the associates or joint ventures. The profit or loss reflects the share of
results of the operations of the associates or joint ventures. Distributions received
from joint ventures or associates reduce the carrying amount of the investment.
Where there has been a change recognised in other comprehensive income by the
associates or joint venture, the Group recognises its share of such changes in other
comprehensive income. Unrealised gains and losses resulting from transactions
IAS 28.28
between the Group and associate or joint venture are eliminated to the extent of the
interest in the associates or joint ventures.
When the Group’s share of losses in an associate or joint venture equals or exceeds its IAS 28.38
interest in the associate or joint venture, the Group does not recognise further
losses, unless it has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate
or joint venture.
After application of the equity method, the Group determines whether it is necessary IAS 28.40
Commentary:
The interest in an associate or a joint venture is the carrying amount of the investment in IAS 28.38
the associate or joint venture under the equity method together with any long-term
interests that, in substance, form part of the investor’s net investment in the associate or
joint venture. For example, an item for which settlement is neither planned nor likely to
occur in the foreseeable future is, in substance, an extension of the entity’s investment in
that associate or joint venture. Such items may include preference shares and long-term
receivables or loans but do not include trade receivables, trade payables or any long-
term receivables for which adequate collateral exists, such as secured loans.
The financial statements of the associate or joint venture are prepared as of the same IAS 28.33
reporting date as the Company unless it is impracticable to do so. When the financial IAS 28.34
statements of an associate or joint venture used in applying the equity method are
prepared as of a different reporting date from that of the Company, adjustments are
made for the effects of significant transactions or events that occur between that date
and the reporting date of the Company. In any case, the difference between the end of
the reporting period of the associate or joint venture and that of the investor shall be no
more than three months. The length of the reporting periods and any difference between
the ends of the reporting periods shall be the same from period to period.
When the financial statements of an associate or joint venture used in applying the equity IFRS 12.22.b
method are as of a reporting date or for a period that is different from that of the
Company, the reporting date of the financial statements of the associate or joint venture
and the reason for using a different reporting date or different period shall be disclosed.
In this illustration, loss of significant influence over associate or joint control over joint
venture is not significant to the Group.
Illustrative accounting policy upon loss of significant influence over associate or joint
control over joint venture:
Upon loss of significant influence or joint control over the associate or joint venture, IAS 28.22
the Group measures the retained interest at fair value. Any difference between the
fair value of the aggregate of the retained interest and proceeds from disposal and
the carrying amount of the investment at the date the equity method was
discontinued is recognised in profit or loss.
a) Financial assets
the case of a financial asset not at fair value through profit or loss, transaction
costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset.
Transaction costs of financial assets carried at fair value through profit or loss are
expensed in profit or loss.
IFRS 9.5.1.3
Trade receivables are measured at the amount of consideration to which the Group
expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a
customer, excluding amounts collected on behalf of third party, if the trade
receivables do not contain a significant financing component at initial recognition.
Subsequent measurement
Investments in debt instruments
Subsequent measurement of debt instruments depends on the Group’s business IFRS 9.5.2.1
model for managing the asset and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the
asset. The three measurement categories for classification of debt instruments
are:
(i) Amortised cost
IFRS 9.4.1.2
Financial assets that are held for the collection of contractual cash flows
where those cash flows represent solely payments of principal and interest
are measured at amortised cost. Financial assets are measured at amortised
cost using the effective interest method, less impairment. Gains and losses
are recognised in profit or loss when the assets are derecognised or
impaired, and through amortisation process.
(ii) Fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI)
Financial assets that are held for collection of contractual cash flows and for IFRS 9.4.1.2A
selling the financial assets, where the assets’ cash flows represent solely
payments of principal and interest, are measured at FVOCI. Financial assets
measured at FVOCI are subsequently measured at fair value. Any gains or
losses from changes in fair value of the financial assets are recognised in
other comprehensive income, except for impairment losses, foreign
exchange gains and losses and interest calculated using the effective
interest method are recognised in profit or loss. The cumulative gain or loss
previously recognised in other comprehensive income is reclassified from
equity to profit or loss as a reclassification adjustment when the financial
asset is de-recognised.
(iii) Fair value through profit or loss
IFRS 9.4.1.4
Assets that do not meet the criteria for amortised cost or FVOCI are
measured at fair value through profit or loss. A gain or loss on a debt
instruments that is subsequently measured at fair value through profit or
loss and is not part of a hedging relationship is recognised in profit or loss in
the period in which it arises.
a) Financial assets
b) Financial liabilities
Initial recognition and measurement
Financial liabilities are recognised when, and only when, the Group becomes a party IFRS 9.3.1.1
to the contractual provisions of the financial instrument. The Group determines the
classification of its financial liabilities at initial recognition.
All financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value plus in the case of IFRS 9.5.1.1
financial liabilities not at fair value through profit or loss, directly attributable
transaction costs.
Subsequent measurement
After initial recognition, financial liabilities that are not carried at fair value through IFRS 9.5.7.2
profit or loss are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective
interest method. Gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss when the
liabilities are derecognised, and through the amortisation process.
De-recognition
IFRS 9.3.3.1
A financial liability is de-recognised when the obligation under the liability is IFRS 9.3.3.4
discharged or cancelled or expires. On derecognition, the difference between the
carrying amounts and the consideration paid is recognised in profit or loss.
Commentary :
The policy for determining the timing of transfers between levels of the fair value IFRS 13.95
hierarchy include the following:
(a) The date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer
(b) the beginning of the reporting period
(c) the end of the reporting period
The policy about the timing of recognising transfers shall be the same for transfers into
levels as for transfers out of the levels.
For financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss at initial recognition IFRS 7.10
in accordance with paragraph 4.2.2 of IFRS 9 and is required to present the effects of
changes in that liability’s credit risk in other comprehensive income, the following
disclosures are required:
(a) The amount of change, cumulatively, in the fair value of the financial liability that is
attributable to changes in the credit risk of that liability.
(b) The difference between the financial liability’s carrying amount and the amount the
entity would be contractually required to pay at maturity to the holder of the
obligation.
(c) Any transfers of the cumulative gain or loss within equity during the period including
the reason for such transfers.
(d) If a liability is derecognised during the period, the amount (if any) presented in other
comprehensive income that was realised at derecognition.
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss which are held for trading
In this illustration, financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss which are
classified as held for trading are not significant to the Group.
Illustrative accounting policies for financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
which are classified as held for trading (if significant):
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss include financial liabilities held IFRS 9.4.2.1.a
for trading. Financial liabilities are classified as held for trading if they are acquired
for the purpose of selling in the near term. This category includes derivative financial
instruments entered into by the Group that are not designated as hedging
instruments in hedge relationships. Separated embedded derivatives are also
classified as held for trading unless they are designated as effective hedging
instruments.
Subsequent to initial recognition, financial liabilities at fair value through profit or
loss are measured at fair value. Any gains or losses arising from changes in fair value
of the financial liabilities are recognised in profit or loss.
IFRS 7.B5.aa
IFRS 7.B5.a
The Group recognises an allowance for expected credit losses (ECLs) for all debt IFRS 9.5.5.1
instruments not held at fair value through profit or loss and financial guarantee
contracts. ECLs are based on the difference between the contractual cash flows due in
accordance with the contract and all the cash flows that the Group expects to receive,
discounted at an approximation of the original effective interest rate. The expected
cash flows will include cash flows from the sale of collateral held or other credit
enhancements that are integral to the contractual terms.
ECLs are recognised in two stages. For credit exposures for which there has not been a IFRS 9.5.5.3
IFRS 9.5.5.5
significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition, ECLs are provided for credit
losses that result from default events that are possible within the next 12-months (a
12-month ECL). For those credit exposures for which there has been a significant
increase in credit risk since initial recognition, a loss allowance is recognised for credit
losses expected over the remaining life of the exposure, irrespective of timing of the
default (a lifetime ECL).
IFRS 9.5.5.15
For trade receivables and contract assets, the Group applies a simplified approach in
IFRS 9.B5.5.35
calculating ECLs. Therefore, the group does not track changes in credit risk, but
instead recognises a loss allowance based on lifetime ECLs at each reporting date. The
Group has established a provision matrix that is based on its historical credit loss
experience, adjusted for forward-looking factors specific to the debtors and the
economic environment.
For debt instruments at fair value through OCI, the Group applies the low credit risk IFRS 9.5.5.3
IFRS 9.5.5.5
simplification. At every reporting date, the Group evaluates whether the debt
instrument is considered to have low credit risk using all reasonable and supportable
information that is available without undue cost or effort. In making that evaluation,
the Group reassesses the internal credit rating of the debt instrument. In addition, the
Group considers that there has been a significant increase in credit risk when the
contractual payments are more than 30 days past due.
IFRS 7.35F.b
The Group considers a financial asset in default when contractual payments are 90 IFRS 9.5.5.9
days past due. However, in certain cases, the Group may also consider a financial asset IFRS 9.B5.5.37
to be in default when internal or external information indicates that the Group is
unlikely to receive the outstanding contractual amounts in full before taking into
account any credit enhancements held by the Group. A financial asset is written off IFRS 9.B5.4.9
when there is no reasonable expectation of recovering the contractual cash flows.
In this illustration, the Group does not have purchased or originated credit-impaired
financial assets.
Illustrative accounting policy on impairment for purchased or originated credit-impaired
financial assets is as follows:
For purchased or originated credit-impaired financial assets, the Group recognises the
cumulative changes in lifetime expected credit losses since initial recognition,
discounted at the credit-impaired effective interest rate (EIR) as a loss allowance. The
EIR for purchased or originated credit-impaired financial assets is calculated taking into
account the initial lifetime ECLs in the estimated cash flows. At each reporting date, the
Group recognises the amount of the changes in lifetime expected credit losses as an
impairment gain or loss. Favourable changes in lifetime expected credit losses are
recognised as an impairment gain, even if the lifetime expected credit losses are less
than the amount of expected credit losses that were included in the estimated cash
flows on initial recognition.
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash at bank and on hand, demand deposits, and IAS 7.46
short-term, highly liquid investments th at are readily convertible to known amount of IAS 7.6
cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value. These also IAS 7.8
include bank overdrafts that form an integral part of the Group’s cash management.
Development properties are properties acquired or being constructed for sale in the IAS 2.6.a and b
ordinary course of business, rather than to be held for the Group’s own use, rental or
capital appreciation.
Development properties are held as inventories and are measured at the lower of cost IAS 2.9
and net realisable value.
Net realisable value of development properties is the estimated selling price in the IAS 2.6 and 36.a
ordinary course of business, based on market prices at the reporting date and
discounted for the time value of money if material, less the estimated costs of
completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.
The costs of development properties recognised in profit or loss on disposal are
determined with reference to the specific costs incurred on the property sold and an
allocation of any non-specific costs based on the relative size of the property sold.
2.20 Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Costs incurred in IAS 2.9, 10 and 36.a
bringing the inventories to their present location and condition are accounted for as
follows:
- Raw materials: purchase costs on a first-in first-out basis. IAS 2.25
Commentary:
Cost formulas
IAS 2.25
Alternatively, the costs may be assigned by using the weighted average cost formula. An
entity shall use the same cost formula for all inventories having a similar nature and use
to the entity. For inventories with a different nature or use, different cost formulas may
be justified.
2.21 Provisions
General
IAS 37.14
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present obligation (legal or
constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources
embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and the amount
of the obligation can be estimated reliably.
Provisions are reviewed at the end of each reporting period and adjusted to reflect the IAS 37.59
current best estimate. If it is no longer probable that an outflow of economic resources
will be required to settle the obligation, the provision is reversed. If the effect of the IAS 37.45-47
time value of money is material, provisions are discounted using a current pre-tax rate
that reflects, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability. When discounting is
IAS 37.60
used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised as a finance
cost.
Warranty provisions
Provisions for warranty-related costs are recognised when the product is sold or
service provided. Initial recognition is based on historical experience. The initial
estimate of warranty-related costs is revised annually.
In this illustration, the Group does not have any decommissioning liability or restructuring
provision.
Illustrative accounting policy for de-commissioning liability when the related asset is
measured using the cost model:
The provision for de-commissioning costs arose on construction of a manufacturing IAS 16.16.c
facility for the production of fire retardant materials. De-commissioning costs are
IAS 37.45
provided at the present value of expected costs to settle the obligation using
estimated cash flows and are recognised as part of the cost of that particular asset. IAS 37.47
The cash flows are discounted at a current pre-tax rate that reflects the risks specific IFRIC 1.8
to the de-commissioning liability. The unwinding of the discount is expensed as
incurred and recognised in profit or loss as a finance cost. The estimated future costs IAS 37.59
of decommissioning are reviewed annually and adjusted as appropriate. Changes in IFRIC 1.5
the estimated future costs or in the discount rate applied are added to or deducted
from the cost of the asset.
Restructuring provision
Government grants are recognised when there is reasonable assurance that the grant IAS 20.39.a
IAS 20.7
will be received and all attaching conditions will be complied with. Where the grant
relates to an asset, the fair value is recognised as deferred capital grant on the balance IAS 20.23 and 24
sheet and is amortised to profit or loss over the expected useful life of the relevant
asset by equal annual instalments.
Where loans or similar assistance are provided by governments or related institutions IAS 20.10A
with an interest rate below the current applicable market rate, the effect of this
favourable interest is regarded as additional government grant.
Commentary:
Alternatively, government grants related to an asset may be presented in the balance IAS 20.24
sheet by deducting the grant in arriving at the carrying amount of the asset.
IAS 20.23
In this illustration, it is assumed that the Group did not receive non-monetary government
grants. If an entity receives non-monetary government grant, the asset and the grant may
be accounted for either at fair value or at nominal amount.
Government grant shall be recognised in profit or loss on a systematic basis over the IAS 20.12
periods in which the entity recognises as expenses the related costs for which the grants
are intended to compensate. Grants related to income may be presented as a credit in IAS 20.29
profit or loss, either separately or under a general heading such as “Other income”.
Alternatively, they are deducted in reporting the related expenses.
A financial guarantee contract is a contract that requires the issuer to make specified IFRS 9.App A
payments to reimburse the holder for a loss it incurs because a specified debtor fails to
make payment when due in accordance with the terms of a debt instrument.
Financial guarantees are recognised initially as a liability at fair value, adjusted for IFRS 9.5.1.1
transaction costs that are directly attributable to the issuance of the guarantee.
Subsequent to initial recognition, financial guarantees are measured at the higher of
the amount of expected credit loss determined in accordance with the policy set out in IFRS 9.4.2.1.C
Note 2.16 and the amount initially recognised less, when appropriate, the cumulative
amount of income recognised over the period of the guarantee.
completed for their intended use or sale. All other borrowing costs are expensed in the IAS 23.8
period they occur. Borrowing costs consist of interest and other costs that an entity IAS 23.5
incurs in connection with the borrowing of funds.
Convertible redeemable preference shares are separated into liability and equity IAS 32.28
components based on the terms of the contract.
On issuance of the convertible redeemable preference shares, the fair value of the IAS 32.32
liability component is determined using a market rate for an equivalent non-convertible
bond. This amount is classified as a financial liability measured at amortised cost (net
of transaction costs) until it is extinguished on conversion or redemption in accordance
with the accounting policy set out in Note 2.15(b).
The remainder of the proceeds is allocated to the conversion option that is recognised IAS 32.31
and included in shareholders’ equity. Transaction costs are deducted from equity, net
of associated income tax. The carrying amount of the conversion option is not
remeasured in subsequent years.
Transaction costs are apportioned between the liability and equity components of the IAS 32.38
In this illustration, the convertible preference shares are classified as compound financial
instruments with liability and equity components based on the terms of the contract.
Illustrative accounting policy if the convertible instruments are classified as hybrid
instruments with embedded derivative:
Convertible loan with conversion option are accounted for as financial liability with an IFRS 9.B4.3.1
embedded equity conversion derivative based on the terms of the contract.
On issuance of convertible loans, the embedded option is recognised at its fair value as
derivative liability with subsequent changes in fair value recognised in profit or loss.
The remainder of the proceeds is allocated to the liability component that is carried at
IFRS 9.B4.3.3
amortised cost until the liability is extinguished on conversion or redemption.
When an equity conversion option is exercised, the carrying amounts of the liability
component and the equity conversion option are derecognised with a corresponding
recognition of share capital.
Commentary:
Defined benefit plan
In this illustration, the Group does not have any defined benefit plans. For illustration of
change in accounting policies relating to IAS 19 Employee Benefits for defined benefit plan,
please refer to Appendix A-2 Defined benefit plans.
In situations where equity instruments are issued and some or all of the goods or services IFRS 2.13A
received by the entity as consideration cannot be specifically identified, the unidentified
goods or services received (or to be received) are measured as the difference between the
fair value of the share-based payment transaction and the fair value of any identifiable
goods or services received at the grant date. This is then capitalised or expensed as
appropriate.
Commentary (continued):
Vesting condition are conditions that determine whether the entity receives the services IFRS 2.App A
that entitle the counterparty to receive cash, other assets or equity instruments of the
entity under a share-based payment arrangement.
Vesting conditions are limited to two types:
- Service condition – a vesting condition that requires the counterparty to complete a IFRS 2.App A
specified period of service which services are provided to the entity; and
- Performance condition – a vesting condition that requires
(a) the counterparty to complete a specified period of service (i.e. a service condition);
the service requirement can be explicit or implicit and
(b) specified performance target(s) to be met while the counterparty is rendering the
required service.
IFRS 2.IG24 and
Any condition that is neither a service condition nor a performance condition would be BC171B
regarded as a non-vesting condition. Examples of non-vesting conditions are:
- A requirement to make monthly savings during the vesting period
- A requirement for a commodity index to reach a minimum level
- Restrictions on the transfer of vested equity instruments
- An agreement not to work for a competitor after the award has vested
Non-vesting conditions are to be taken into account when estimating the fair value of the IFRS 2.21
equity instruments granted.
The transfer of the employee share option reserve to retained earnings upon expiry of the
option is not mandatory. Alternatively, the employee share option reserve may be kept as a
separate reserve upon expiry of the option.
In this illustration, it is assumed that employee leave entitlement is not significant and is not
included in the list of significant accounting policies.
Illustrative accounting policy for employee leave entitlement (if significant):
IAS 19.13
Employee entitlements to annual leave are recognised as a liability when they are accrued
to the employees. The undiscounted liability for leave expected to be settled wholly before
twelve months after the end of the reporting period is recognised for services rendered by
employees up to the end of the reporting period. The liability for leave expected to be IAS 19.155
settled beyond twelve months from the end of the reporting period is determined using the IAS 19.156
projected unit credit method. The net total of service costs, net interest on the liability and
remeasurement of the liability are recognised in profit or loss.
Termination benefit
In this illustration, the Group does not provide any termination benefit to its employees. IAS 19.8
Illustrative accounting policy for termination benefit:
Termination benefits are employee benefits provided in exchange for the termination of an
employee’s employment as a result of either an entity’s decision to terminate an
employee’s employment before the normal retirement date or an employee’s decision to
accept an offer of benefits in exchange for the termination of employment.
IAS 19.165
A liability and expense for a termination benefits is recognised at the earlier of when the IAS 19.169
entity can no longer withdraw the offer of those benefits and when the entity recognises
related restructuring costs. Initial recognition and subsequent changes to termination
benefits are measured in accordance with the nature of the employment benefits, short-
term employee benefits, or other long-term employee benefits.
In this illustration, the employee share option plans are equity-settled share-based payment
transactions. Cash-settled share-based payment transactions are not illustrated. IFRS 2.30
IFRS 2.32
Illustrative accounting policy for cash-settled share-based payment transactions: IFRS 2.33
2.27 Leases
a) As lessee
Finance leases which transfer to the Group substantially all the risks and IAS 17.8
rewards incidental to ownership of the leased item, are capitalised at the
inception of the lease at the fair value of the leased asset or, if lower, at the IAS 17.20
present value of the minimum lease payments. Any initial direct costs are also
added to the amount capitalised. Lease payments are apportioned between the IAS 17.25
finance charges and reduction of the lease liability so as to achieve a constant
rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Finance charges are
charged to profit or loss. Contingent rents, if any, are charged as expenses in
the periods in which they are incurred.
Capitalised leased assets are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated IAS 17.27
useful life of the asset and the lease term, if there is no reasonable certainty
that the Group will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term.
IAS 17.33
Operating lease payments are recognised as an expense in profit or loss on a SIC-15.5
straight-line basis over the lease term. The aggregate benefit of incentives
provided by the lessor is recognised as a reduction of rental expense over the
lease term on a straight-line basis.
b) As lessor
Leases in which the Group does not transfer substantially all the risks and IAS 17.8
rewards of ownership of the asset are classified as operating leases. Initial IAS 17.52
direct costs incurred in negotiating an operating lease are added to the
carrying amount of the leased asset and recognised over the lease term on the
same bases as rental income. The accounting policy for rental income is set
out in Note 2.29(d). Contingent rents are recognised as revenue in the period
in which they are earned.
Non-current assets and disposal groups classified as held for sale are measured at the IFRS 5.15
lower of their carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell. Non-current assets and IFRS 5.6
disposal groups are classified as held for sale if their carrying amounts will be
recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. A
IFRS 5.32
component of the Group is classified as a ‘discontinued operation’ when the criteria to
be classified as held for sale have been met or it has been disposed of and such a
component represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of
operations or is part of a single coordinated plan to dispose of a separate major line of
business or geographical area of operations.
Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets once classified as held for sale are IFRS 5.25
not depreciated or amortised.
The Group offers customers the option to separately purchase extended warranty
that provides the customer with a distinct service to the customer in addition to the IFRS 15.B29
assurance that the product complies with agreed-upon specifications. The Group
accounts for a service-type warranty as a separate performance obligation to
which the Group allocates a portion of the transaction price. The portion of the
consideration allocated to the service-type warranty is initially recorded as a
contract liability and recognised as revenue over the period the warranty services
are provided. IFRS 15.129
IFRS 15.94
The Group has elected to apply the practical expedient to recognise the
incremental costs of obtaining a contract as an expense when incurred where the
amortisation period of the asset that would otherwise be recognised is one year or
less.
d) Rental income
Rental income arising from operating leases on investment properties is accounted IAS 17.50
for on a straight-line basis over the lease terms. The aggregate costs of incentives IFRIC 15.5
provided to lessees are recognised as a reduction of rental income over the lease
term on a straight-line basis.
Commentary:
Disclosures on performance obligations
IFRS 15.119
IFRS 15.119 sets out the disclosures required about an entity’s performance
obligations in contracts with customers, including a description of all of the
following:
(a) when the entity typically satisfies its performance obligations (e.g. upon
shipment, upon delivery, as services are rendered or upon completion of
service), including when performance obligations are satisfied in a bill-and-
hold arrangement;
(b) the significant payment terms (for example, when payment is typically due,
whether the contract has a significant financing component, whether the
consideration amount is variable and whether the estimate of variable
consideration is typically constrained);
(c) the nature of the goods or services that the entity has promised to transfer,
highlighting any performance obligations to arrange for another party to
transfer goods or services (i.e. if the entity is acting as an agent);
(d) obligations for returns, refunds and other similar obligations; and
(e) types of warranties and related obligations.
Each entity needs to tailor the disclosures based on its specific circumstances.
IFRS 15 does not prohibit the use of alternative descriptions for “contract asset” and
“contract liability”. If the Group chooses to use an alternative description for “contract
asset”, it is required to provide sufficient information for a user of the financial statements
to distinguish between receivables (i.e. unconditional right to consideration where only the
passage of time is required before payment of consideration is due) and contract assets.
Assurance-type versus service-type warranty IFRS 15.B28-B30
In this illustration, the Group provides service-type warranty (i.e. the warranty is a distinct
service in addition to the assurance that the product complies with agreed-upon
specifications) which is a separate performance obligation to which the Group allocates a
portion of the transaction price under IFRS 15.
This is to be distinguished from assurance-type warranty which is not a distinct service and
is accounted for as a provision for warranty under IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities
and Contingent Assets.
Commentary:
Identification of distinct performance obligations
In this illustration, for bundled packages, the Group accounts for the sale of equipment and
IFRS 15.27
installation service separately as they are assessed to be distinct, that is, the customer can
benefit from the good or service on its own or together with other readily available
resources and the Group’s promise to transfer the good or service to the customer is
separately identifiable from other promises in the contract.
If the promises in the bundled package are assessed to be not distinct, the disclosure
should be tailored accordingly.
2.30 Taxes
b) Deferred tax
Deferred tax is provided using the liability method on temporary differences at IAS 12.22.c
the end of the reporting period between the tax bases of assets and liabilities
and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes.
Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for all temporary differences, except:
IAS 12.39
- Where the deferred tax liability arises from the initial recognition of
goodwill or of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business
combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the
accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; and
- In respect of taxable temporary differences associated with investments in
subsidiaries, associates and interests in joint ventures, where the timing of IAS 12.34
the reversal of the temporary differences can be controlled and it is
probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable
future.
Deferred tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences,
the carry forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses, to the extent IAS 12.24
that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the IAS 12.44
deductible temporary differences, and the carry forward of unused tax credits
and unused tax losses can be utilised except:
- Where the deferred tax asset relating to the deductible temporary
difference arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a
transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the
transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss;
and
- In respect of deductible temporary differences associated with
investments in subsidiaries, associates and interests in joint ventures,
deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is probable
that the temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and
taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can
be utilised.
c) Sales tax
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of sales tax
except:
- Where the sales tax incurred on a purchase of assets or services is not
recoverable from the taxation authority, in which case the sales tax is
recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the
expense item as applicable; and
- Receivables and payables that are stated with the amount of sales tax
included.
Proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares are recognised as share capital in equity. IAS 32.37
Incremental costs directly attributable to the issuance of ordinary shares are deducted
against share capital.
The Group’s own equity instruments, which are reacquired (treasury shares) are IAS 32.33
recognised at cost and deducted from equity. No gain or loss is recognised in profit or
loss on the purchase, sale, issue or cancellation of the Group’s own equity instruments.
Any difference between the carrying amount of treasury shares and the consideration
received, if reissued, is recognised directly in equity. Voting rights related to treasury
shares are nullified for the Group and no dividends are allocated to them respectively.
2.33 Contingencies
In the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies, management has made the
following judgements which have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised IAS 1.122
in the consolidated financial statements:
In this illustration, it is assumed that these are the judgements made in applying accounting
policies that has the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial
statements.
Illustrative disclosures of other judgements made in applying accounting policies:
Consolidation of entities in which the Group holds less than a majority of voting rights (de facto
control)
The Group considers that it controls Electronics Limited even though it owns less than
50% of the voting rights. This is because the Group is the single largest shareholder of
Electronics Limited with 48% equity interest. The remaining 52% of the equity shares in
Electronics Limited are widely held by many other shareholders, none of which
individually hold more than 1% of the equity shares (as recorded in the Company’s
shareholder’s register from 1st October 2012 to 31 December 2018). Since 1 October
2012, which is the date of acquisition of Electronics Limited, there is no history of
other shareholders collaborating to exercise their votes collectively or to outvote the
Group.
The key assumptions concerning the future and other key sources of estimation
uncertainty at the end of the reporting period are discussed below. The Group based its
assumptions and estimates on parameters available when the financial statements
were prepared. Existing circumstances and assumptions about future developments,
however, may change due to market changes or circumstances arising beyond the
control of the Group. Such changes are reflected in the assumptions when they occur.
IFRS 7.35G.b
Commentary:
Expected credit loss (ECL)
IFRS 7.35G.b requires an entity to disclose how forward-looking information has been
incorporated into the determination of ECL, including the use of macroeconomic
information. The Group did not provide detailed information on how the forecast economic
conditions have been incorporated in the determination of ECL because the impact is not
significant. Entities are expected to provide more detailed information if the forward-
looking information has a significant impact in the calculation of ECL.
In this illustration, it is assumed that these are the key assumptions and estimation
uncertainty that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying
amounts of the assets and liabilities within the next financial year.
Illustrative disclosures of other key sources of estimation uncertainty:
Development costs
Development costs are capitalised in accordance with the accounting policy in Note
X. Initial capitalisation of costs is based on management’s judgement that
technological and economic feasibility is confirmed, usually when a product
development project has reached a defined milestone according to an established
project management model. In determining the amounts to be capitalised,
management makes assumptions regarding the expected future cash generation of
the project, discount rates to be applied and the expected period of benefits. As at
31 December 2018, the carrying amount of development costs capitalised at the
end of the reporting period was $XXX (2017: $XXX). If the expected future cash
generation of the project had been 20% lower than management’s estimate, the
carrying amount of development costs would have been $XXX (2017: $XXX) lower.
4. Revenue
a) Disaggregation of revenue IFRS 15.114
IFRS 15.115
Fire prevention
Segments Electronic equipment Development properties equipment and services Total revenue
2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017
$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
Primary geographical markets
Singapore 18,998 28,642 32,542 31,236 21,740 25,020 73,280 84,898
People’s Republic of China 22,970 23,005 – – – - 22,970 23,005
Malaysia 9,017 11,318 11,973 9,122 – – 20,990 20,440
Vietnam and others 19,480 17,260 – – – – 19,480 17,260
70,465 80,225 44,515 40,358 21,740 25,020 136,720 145,603
Major product or service lines
4. Revenue (continued)
b) Judgement and methods used in estimating revenue
(i) Estimating variable consideration for sale of electronic equipment
In estimating the variable consideration for the sale of electronic equipment, the IFRS 15.126
Group uses the expected value method to predict the volume discounts and product
returns, by the different product types and geographical areas. For existing
products, management relies on historical experience with purchasing patterns and
product returns of customers, analysed by different product types, customers and
geographical areas, for the past 2 to 4 years. For new products, management uses
the historical trends for purchasing patterns and returns for similar products in the
same geographical area, and adjusted for higher return rates based on historical
trends for new product launches, so as to determine the projection for new product
returns.
IFRS 15.123
Management has exercised judgement in applying the constraint on the estimated
variable consideration that can be included in the transaction price. For volume
discounts, management has determined that a portion of the estimated variable
consideration is subject to the constraint as, based on past experience with the
customers, it is highly probable that a significant reversal in the cumulative amount
of revenue recognised will occur, and therefore will not be recognised as revenue.
For product returns, management considers its historical experience and evidence
from other similar contracts to develop an estimate of variable consideration for
expected returns using the expected value method.
(ii) Recognition of revenue from of development properties over time
For the sale of development properties where the Group satisfies its performance IFRS 15.126
IFRS 15.74
obligations over time, management has determined that a cost-based input method
provides a faithful depiction of the Group’s performance in transferring control of
the development properties to the customers, as it reflects the Group’s efforts
incurred to date relative to the total inputs expected to be incurred for the
development properties. The measure of progress is based on the costs incurred to
date as a proportion of total costs expected to be incurred up to the completion of
the development properties.
The estimated total construction and other related costs are based on contracted IFRS 15.124
amounts and, in respect of amounts not contracted for, management relies on past
experience and knowledge of the project engineers to make estimates of the
amounts to be incurred. In making these estimates, management takes into
consideration the historical trends of the amounts incurred in its other similar
development properties, analysed by different property types and geographical
areas for the past 3 to 5 years.
iii) Determining transaction price and amounts allocated to sale and installation of fire
prevention equipment
IFRS 15.126
For the bundled packages of sale and installation of fire prevention equipment, the IFRS 15.74
Group allocates the transaction price to the sale of equipment and installation service
based on their relative stand-alone selling prices. The standalone selling prices are
determined based on estimated costs plus margin.
For the installation of the fire prevention equipment, revenue is recognised over IFRS 15.124
time, based on the actual costs incurred relative to the total estimated costs. The
estimated costs are based on contracted amounts and, in respect of amounts not
contracted for, management relies on past experience and knowledge of the project
engineers to make estimates of the amounts to be incurred. In making these
estimates, management takes into consideration the historical trends of the
amounts incurred in its similar installation services.
4. Revenue (continued)
c) Contract assets and contract liabilities
Information about receivables, contract assets and contract liabilities from contracts IFRS 15.116.a
with customers is disclosed as follows:
Group
As at 31 As at 1
December January
2018 2017 2017
$’000 $’000 $’000
Receivables from contracts with customers (Note 21) 24,176 24,341 21,447
Contract assets 3,751 6,928 3,269
Capitalised contract costs 658 690 490
Contract liabilities 926 1,309 1,255
The Group has recognised impairment losses on receivables arising from contracts with IFRS 15.113.b
customers amounting to $90,000 (2017: $115,000).
Contract assets primarily relate to the Group’s right to consideration for work IFRS 15.117
completed but not yet billed at reporting date for sale of development properties.
Contract assets are transferred to receivables when the rights become unconditional.
Contract liabilities primarily relate to the Group’s obligation to transfer goods or IFRS 15.117
services to customers for which the Group has received advances received from
customers for sale of development properties
Contract liabilities are recognised as revenue as the Group performs under the
contract.
(i) Significant changes in contract assets are explained as follows: IFRS 15.118
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
(ii) Significant changes in contract liabilities are explained as follows: IFRS 15.118
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
4. Revenue (continued)
d) Transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligation
The aggregate amount of transaction price allocated to the unsatisfied (or partially IFRS 15.120.a
unsatisfied) performance obligations as at 31 December 2017 is $798,000. This IFRS 15.C5.d
IFRS 15.128
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
4. Revenue (continued)
Commentary:
Disaggregation of revenue
Under IFRS 15.114, an entity is required to disaggregate revenue from contracts with customers IFRS 15.114
into categories that depict how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash
flows are affected by economic factors.
In this illustration, the Group has determined that disaggregation of revenue using existing
segments, geographical markets, major product lines and timing of transfer of goods (at a point
in time or over time) meets the disclosure objective in IFRS 15.114.
IFRS 15.B87
The extent to which an entity’s revenue is disaggregated depends on the facts and
circumstances of its contracts with customers. Some entities may need to use more
than one type of category while other entities may use only one type of category to
disaggregate revenue. Hence the disclosure should be tailored accordingly for each
entity.
IFRS 15.B89
Examples of categories that can be used as basis for disaggregation include:
(a) type of good or service (e.g. major product lines)
(b) geographical regions
(c) market or customer type
(d) type of contract (e.g. fixed-price and time-and-materials contracts)
(e) contract duration (e.g. short-term and long-term contracts)
(f) timing of transfer of goods or services (e.g. at a point in time or over time)
(g) sales channels (e.g. sold directly to consumers or sold through intermediaries)
When selecting the type of category to disaggregate revenue, an entity should consider how IFRS 15.B88
information about its revenue has been presented for other purposes, including earnings
releases, annual reports or investor presentations, and information regularly reviewed by the
chief operating decision maker for evaluating the financial performance of operating segments.
If the entity applies IFRS 8 Operating Segments, it must disclose sufficient information to enable IFRS 15.115
users of financial statements to understand the relationship between the disclosure of
disaggregated revenue and revenue information that is disclosed for each reporting segment.
4. Revenue (continued)
Commentary (continued):
Methods, inputs and assumptions in determining revenue
IFRS 15.126
IFRS 15.126 sets out the disclosures required about the methods, inputs and
assumptions used for determining its transaction price and amounts allocated to
performance obligations, including all of the following:
(a) determining the transaction price, which includes, but is not limited to, estimating
variable consideration, adjusting the consideration for the effects of the time
value of money and measuring non-cash consideration;
(b) assessing whether an estimate of variable consideration is constrained;
(c) allocating the transaction price, including estimating stand-alone selling prices of
promised goods or services and allocating discounts and variable consideration to
a specific part of the contract (if applicable); and
(d) measuring obligations for returns, refunds and other similar obligations.
Each entity needs to tailor the disclosures based on its specific circumstances.
IFRS 15.124 requires disclosures about the methods used to recognise revenue over IFRS 15.124
time and an explanation of why the methods used provide a faithful depiction of the
transfer of goods or services.
Each entity needs to tailor the disclosures based on its specific circumstances.
4. Revenue (continued)
Commentary (continued):
Significant judgement in applying IFRS 15
IFRS 15.123
An entity is required to disclose the judgements, and changes in the judgements made
in applying IFRS 15 that significantly affect the determination of the amount and timing
of revenue from contracts with customers, Each entity needs to tailor the disclosures
based on its specific circumstances.
In particular, an entity is required to explain the judgements, and changes in the IFRS 15.123
judgements, used in determining both of the following:
(a) The timing of satisfaction of performance obligations
(b) The transaction price and the amounts allocated to performance obligations
In addition,
A entity shall disclose the significant judgements made in evaluating when a customer IFRS 15.125
obtains control of promised goods or services for performance obligations satisfied at a
point in time.
An entity is also required to describe the judgements made in determining the amount of IFRS 15.127.a
the costs incurred to obtain or fulfil a contract with a customer that are capitalised as an
asset.
Presentation of capitalised contract costs
IFRS 15 is silent about on the classification of capitalised contract costs. Therefore, the
Group needs to develop an appropriate accounting policy as follows:
Capitalised costs to obtain a contract should be either presented as (i) a separate class
of intangible assets in the statement of financial position and its amortisation in the
same line as amortisation of intangible assets, or (ii) a separate class of asset (similar to
inventory) in the statement of financial position and its amortisation within cost of
goods sold or changes in contract costs.
Capitalised costs to fulfil a contract should be presented as a separate class of assets in
the statement of financial position and its amortisation within cost of goods sold or
changes in contract costs.
Contract balances
IFRS 15 requires that the explanation of significant changes in the contract asset and the IFRS 15.118
contract liability balances during the reporting period include both qualitative and
quantitative information, although a tabular reconciliation of the aggregated contract
balances is not specifically required by the standard.
Transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations
In this illustration, the Group has disclosed a qualitative explanation of when it expects to IFRS 15.120
recognise as revenue the amount of transaction price allocated to unsatisfied performance
obligations as of the end of the reporting period.
IFRS 15.120 allows the disclosure to be in the form of either qualitative explanation or
quantitative explanation that is based on the time bands that would be most appropriate for
the duration of the remaining performance obligations can be used. The latter approach is
not illustrated in this publication.
4. Revenue (continued)
5. Interest income
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Interest income from:
- Debt instruments at amortised cost 382 - IFRS 7.20.b
- Debt instruments at FVOCI 48 - IFRS 7.20.b
- Loans and receivables - 255 IFRS 7.20.a.iv
- Available-for-sale financial assets - 47 IFRS 7.20.a.ii
- Held-to-maturity investment - 25 IFRS 7.20.a.iii
Included in interest income from loans and receivables is interest of $28,000 (2017:
$22,000) from an impaired loan to a fellow subsidiary (Note 21).
6. Other income
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Amortisation of deferred capital grants (Note 29) 239 180 IAS 20.39
Rental income from investment properties (Note 14) 315 291 IAS 40.75.f.i
Net gain from fair value adjustment of investment properties (Note 14) 489 129 IAS 40.76.d
Net gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment – 120 IAS 1.98.c
Net fair value gains on financial instruments:
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
- Held for trading investment securities 255 95 IFRS 7.20.a.i
- Derivatives 43 56 IFRS 7.20.a.i
- FVOCI/Available-for-sale financial assets (transferred from equity
on disposal of investment securities) 30 15 IFRS 7.20.a.ii
7. Finance costs
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Interest expense on:
- Bank loans, bonds and bank overdrafts carried at amortised cost 1,640 1,506 IFRS 7.20.a.v
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Audit fees:
- Auditor of the Company 400 400 SGX 1207.6a
- Other auditors 50 50
Non-audit fees:
- Auditor of the Company 250 250 SGX 1207.6a
- Other auditors 30 30
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment 3,043 2,838 IAS 1.104
Amortisation of intangible assets (Note 15) 220 252 IAS 1.104
Transactions costs incurred in a business combination 300 – IAS 1.97
Commentary:
IAS 1.97 and 98
When items of income and expense are material, their nature and amount should be disclosed
separately. Circumstances that would give rise to the separate disclosure of items of income and
expense include:
(a) Write-downs of inventories to net realisable value or of property, plant and equipment to
recoverable amount, as well as reversals of such write-downs;
(b) Restructurings of the activities of an entity and reversals of any provisions for the costs of
restructuring;
(c) Disposals of items of property, plant and equipment;
(d) Disposals of investments;
(e) Discontinued operations;
(f) Litigation settlements; and
(g) Other reversals of provisions.
Commentary (continued):
An entity shall disclose the fee income and expense (other than amounts included in determining
the effective interest rate) arising from financial assets or financial liabilities that are not at fair IFRS 7.20.c
value through profit or loss and trust and other fiduciary activities that result in the holding or
investing of assets on behalf of individuals, trusts, retirement benefit plans, and other
institutions, either on the face of the financial statements or in the notes.
- Effect of collateral and other credit enhancements on the amounts arising from IFRS 7.35K
expected credit loss;
- Credit risk; IFRS 7.36
- Accounting policy for recognising any difference between fair value at initial IFRS 7.28
recognition and the amount that would be determined at that date using valuation
technique and the aggregate difference yet to be recognised in profit or loss; and
IFRS 7.42D
- Transfers of financial assets that are not derecognised in their entirety.
IFRS 7 requires an entity to group financial instruments into classes that are appropriate
IFRS 7.6
to the nature of information disclosed and that take into account the characteristics of IFRS 7.AGB1
those financial instruments.
In determining classes of financial instruments, an entity shall, at a minimum: IFRS 7.AGB2
- Distinguish instruments measured at amortised cost from those measured at fair
value
- Treat as a separate class or classes those financial instruments outside the scope of
IFRS 7
The entity is also required to provide sufficient information to permit reconciliation of IFRS 7.6
the classes of financial instruments to the line items presented in the balance sheet.
These expense items have been disclosed separately as they are considered to be material in the IAS 1.97
assumed scenario due to their size or nature.
Reclassification adjustments
In this illustration, the entity has chosen to disclose the reclassification adjustments and current IAS 1.94
year gain or loss in the notes. An entity may choose to present this information in the statement
of comprehensive income itself.
Reclassification adjustments are amounts reclassified to profit or loss in the current period that IAS 1.7
IAS 1.92
were recognised in other comprehensive income in the current or previous periods. Such IAS 1.93
amounts must be separately disclosed. For example, when an available-for-sale financial asset is
sold, accumulated amounts previously recognised in fair value adjustment reserve will be
reclassified into profit or loss for the period.
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Consolidated income statement:
Current income tax – continuing operations:
- Current income taxation 1,422 1,390 IAS 12.80.a
- (Over)/under provision in respect of previous years (50) 91 IAS 12.80.b
1,372 1,481
Deferred income tax – continuing operations (Note 20):
- Origination and reversal of temporary differences 191 260 IAS 12.80.c
- Benefits from previously unrecognised tax losses (6) (8) IAS 12.80.f
185 252
Income tax attributable to continuing operations 1,557 1,733
Income tax attributable to discontinued operation (Note 11) (7) (5) IAS 12.80.h
Income tax expense recognised in profit or loss 1,550 1,728
Group Company
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Tax at the domestic rates applicable to profits in the countries where the
Group operates 1,322 1,617
Adjustments:
Non-deductible expenses 560 473
Income not subject to taxation (170) (388)
Effect of partial tax exemption and tax relief (35) (20)
Deductions on treasury shares issued pursuant to employee share option
plan (3) –
Deferred tax on convertible redeemable preference shares (4) (3)
Benefits from previously unrecognised tax losses (6) (8)
Deferred tax assets not recognised 46 21
(Over)/under provision in respect of previous years (50) 91
Share of results of associates (112) (56)
Others 2 1
Income tax expense recognised in profit or loss 1,550 1,728
Commentary:
Alternatively, an entity may present a numerical reconciliation between the average effective IAS 12.81.c.ii and 86
tax rate (i.e., tax expense/income divided by the accounting profit) and the applicable tax
rate, disclosing also the basis on which the applicable tax rate is computed.
In explaining the relationship between tax expense/income and accounting profit, an entity IAS 12.85
uses an applicable tax rate that provides the most meaningful information to the users of its
financial statements. Often, the most meaningful rate is the domestic rate of tax in the
country in which the entity is domiciled, aggregating the tax rate applied for national taxes
with the rates applied for any local taxes which are computed on a substantially similar level
of taxable profit (tax loss). However, for an entity operating in several jurisdictions, it may be
more meaningful to aggregate separate reconciliations prepared using the domestic rate in
each individual jurisdiction.
Tax deduction for treasury shares transferred under employee share scheme
A Singapore company is granted a tax deduction for the cost incurred in acquiring treasury
shares which are transferred to any person under a stock option scheme or share award
scheme by reason of any office or employment held in Singapore by that person.
Disclosure of nature of expenses that are not deductible for income tax purposes
The nature of :
- expenses that are not deductible for income tax purposes; and
- income not subject to taxation
that give rise to a tax effect should be disclosed if the amount was material in accordance
with IAS 1.29.
Illustrative note disclosure on the nature of expenses that are not deductible for income tax
purposes :
The nature of expenses that are not deductible for income tax purposes are as follows:
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Transaction costs related to acquisition of a
subsidiary XXX -
Exchange loss arising from revaluation of non-trade
balances XXX XXX
Private car expenses XXX XXX
Entertainment and transportation expenses incurred
for personal purposes XXX XXX
XXX XXX
11. Discontinued operation and disposal group classified as held for sale
On 15 May 2018, the Company announced the decision of its board of directors to IFRS 5.41.a, b and d
dispose of one of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Rubber Hose Pte Ltd (RHP), which was
previously reported in the rubber hose segment. The decision is consistent with the
Group’s strategy to focus on its core electronics and property businesses and to divest its
rubber hose business, which has been underperforming for the last five years. As at 31
December 2018, the assets and liabilities related to RHP have been presented in the
balance sheet as “Assets of disposal group classified as held for sale” and “Liabilities
directly associated with disposal group classified as held for sale”, and its results are
presented separately on profit or loss as “Loss from discontinued operation, net of tax”.
The disposal of RHP was completed on 15 February 2019 (Note 44).
Balance sheet disclosures
The major classes of assets and liabilities of RHP classified as held for sale and the related
asset revaluation reserve as at 31 December are as follows: IFRS 5.38 and 40
Group
2018
$’000
Assets:
Property, plant and equipment 1,466
Inventories 190
Trade and other receivables 364
Cash and short-term deposits 250
Assets of disposal group classified as held for sale 2,270
Liabilities:
Trade and other payables (1,043)
Deferred tax liabilities (28)
8.5% p.a. fixed rate SGD bank loan due 1 January 2019 (1,000)
Liabilities directly associated with disposal group classified as held for sale (2,071)
Net assets directly associated with disposal group classified as held for sale 199
Reserve:
Asset revaluation reserve 128
11. Discontinued operation and disposal group classified as held for sale (continued)
Income statement disclosures
IFRS 5.33.b
The results of RHP for the years ended 31 December are as follows:
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
The basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operation are calculated by dividing
the loss from discontinued operation, net of tax, attributable to owners of the Company by
the weighted average number of ordinary shares for basic earnings per share computation
and weighted average number of ordinary shares for diluted earnings per share
computation respectively. These loss and share data are presented in the tables in Note
12(a).
11. Discontinued operation and disposal group classified as held for sale (continued)
Immediately before the classification of RHP as a discontinued operation, the recoverable
amount was estimated for certain items of property, plant and equipment and no
impairment loss was identified. Following the classification, an impairment loss of
$450,000 (2017: nil) was recognised to reduce the carrying amount of the assets in the
disposal group to the fair value less costs to sell. This amount was included as part of the
“Loss from discontinued operation, net of tax“.
Commentary:
IFRS 5.5B clarifies that disclosure requirements in other IFRSs do not apply to non-current IFRS 5.5B
assets held for sale (or disposal groups) unless those IFRSs explicitly refer to those assets and
disposals groups. Disclosure requirements continue to apply for assets and liabilities that are not IFRS 5.5B.b
within the scope of the measurement requirements of IFRS 5, but within the disposal group.
a) Continuing operations
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations are calculated by dividing profit IAS 33.10 and 12
from continuing operations, net of tax, attributable to owners of the Company by the
weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the financial year.
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations are calculated by dividing profit
from continuing operations, net of tax, attributable to owners of the Company (after IAS 33.31 and 33
adjusting for interest expense on convertible redeemable preference shares) by the
weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the financial year plus
the weighted average number of ordinary shares that would be issued on the
conversion of all the dilutive potential ordinary shares into ordinary shares.
The following tables reflect the profit and share data used in the computation of basic
and diluted earnings per share for the years ended 31 December:
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
IAS 33.70.a
Profit for the year attributable to owners of the Company 4,776 7,105
Add back: Loss from discontinued operation, net of tax, attributable
to owners of the Company 544 188
Profit from continuing operations, net of tax, attributable to owners
of the Company used in the computation of basic earnings per share
from continuing operations 5,320 7,293
No. of No. of
shares shares
‘000 ‘000
Weighted average number of ordinary shares for basic earnings per
share computation * 23,150 23,055 IAS 33.70.b
Effects of dilution :
- Share options 18 15 IAS 33.70.b
* The weighted average number of shares takes into account the weighted average
effect of changes in treasury shares transactions during the year.
IAS 33.70.c
325,000 (2017: 200,000) share options granted to employees under the existing
employee share option plans have not been included in the calculation of diluted
earnings per share because they are anti-dilutive.
Since the end of the financial year, senior executives have exercised the options to IAS 33.70.d
acquire 2,000 (2017: nil) ordinary shares. There have been no other transactions
involving ordinary shares or potential ordinary shares since the reporting date and
before the completion of these financial statements.
Commentary:
If the number of ordinary or potential ordinary shares outstanding increases as a result of a IAS 33.64
capitalisation, bonus issue or share split, or decreases as a result of a reverse share split, the
calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for all periods presented shall be adjusted
retrospectively. If these changes occur after the end of the reporting period but before the
financial statements are authorised for issue, the per share calculations for current and prior
period presented shall be based on the new number of shares and this fact should be
disclosed. In addition, basic and diluted earnings per share of all periods presented shall be
adjusted for the effects of errors and adjustments resulting from changes in accounting
policies accounted for retrospectively.
In this illustration, it is assumed that the profit or loss from discontinued operation is not
attributable to non-controlling interests.
The objective of diluted earnings per share is consistent with that of basic earnings per share IAS 33.32
which is to provide a measure of the interest of each ordinary share in the performance of an
entity while giving effect to all dilutive potential ordinary shares outstanding during the
period. As a result:
(a) profit or loss attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent entity is increased by
the after-tax amount of dividends and interest recognised in the period in respect of the
dilutive potential ordinary shares and is adjusted for any other changes in income or
expense that would result from the conversion of the dilutive potential ordinary shares;
and
(b) the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding is increased by the
weighted average number of additional ordinary shares that would have been
outstanding assuming the conversion of all dilutive potential ordinary shares.
Potential ordinary shares shall be treated as dilutive only when their conversion to ordinary IAS 33.41
shares would decrease earnings per share or increase loss per share from continuing
operations.
An entity shall disclose a description of ordinary share transactions or potential ordinary IAS 33.70.d
share transactions, other than those resulted from share capitalisation, bonus issue or share
split, that occur after the end of the reporting period and that would have changed
significantly the number of ordinary shares or potential ordinary shares outstanding at the
end of the period if those transactions had occurred before the end of the reporting period.
Example of such transactions include: IAS 33.71
Furniture
Freehold Plant and and
Group land Buildings equipment fixtures Total
$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
Cost or valuation: At valuation At cost IAS 16.73.a
At 31 December 2017 and 1 January 2018 10,726 3,574 23,933 2,752 40,985 IAS 16.73.d
Transfer from investment properties (Note 14) – 300 – – 300 IAS 16.73.e.ix
At 31 December 2017 and 1 January 2018 – – 8,364 1,557 9,921 IAS 16.73.d
Depreciation charge for the year – 115 2,628 300 3,043 IAS 16.73.e.vii
Furniture
Company and fixtures
$’000
Cost: IAS 16.73.a
At 1 January 2017 1,166 IAS 16.73.d
Additions 221 IAS 16.73.e.i
At 31 December 2017 and 1 January 2018 1,387 IAS 16.73.d
Additions 626 IAS 16.73.e.i
At 31 December 2018 2,013 IAS 16.73.d
Accumulated depreciation:
At 1 January 2017 669 IAS 16.73.d
Depreciation charge for the year 115 IAS 16.73.e.vii
At 31 December 2017 and 1 January 2018 784 IAS 16.73.d
Depreciation charge for the year 150 IAS 16.73.e.vii
At 31 December 2018 934 IAS 16.73.d
fair value of the freehold land and buildings. The date of the revaluation was 31 December SGX 1207.11
2018 (31 December 2017: 31 December 2017, 1 January 2017: Nil). Details of valuation
techniques and inputs used are disclosed in Note 39.
IAS 16.77.e
If the freehold land and buildings were measured using the cost model, the carrying
amounts would be as follows:
Group
31 December 1 January
2018 2017 2017
$’000 $’000 $’000
Freehold land:
- Cost and net carrying amount 9,560 8,336 7,560
Buildings:
- Cost 2,730 3,048 3,548
- Accumulated depreciation and impairment (150) (200) (210)
- Net carrying amount 2,580 2,848 3,338
Commentary:
Entities are also encouraged to disclose the following information, which users of financial IAS 16.79
statements may find relevant to their needs:
- The carrying amount of temporarily idle property, plant and equipment;
- The gross carrying amount of any fully depreciated property, plant and equipment that is still
in use;
- The carrying amount of property, plant and equipment retired from active use and not
classified as held for sale in accordance with IFRS 5; and
- When the cost model is used, the fair value of property, plant and equipment when this is
materially different from the carrying amount.
If the amount of borrowing costs eligible for capitalisation have been determined by applying a IAS 23.14 and
capitalisation rate to the expenditures on a qualifying asset because funds used for the 26.b
purpose of obtaining the qualifying asset are borrowed generally (rather than specifically), the
capitalisation rate should be the weighted average of the borrowing costs applicable to the
borrowings of the entity that are outstanding during the period, other than borrowings made
specifically for the purpose of obtaining a qualifying asset. The amount of borrowing costs
capitalised during a period should not exceed the amount of borrowing costs incurred during
that period.
In this illustration, there was no change in the useful life of property, plant and equipment of IAS 8.39
IAS 16.76
the Group. Where applicable, an entity should disclose the nature and effect of a change in
accounting estimate that has an effect in the current or subsequent periods.
Illustrative note disclosure for change in estimated useful life of equipment:
During the financial year, the Group conducted an operational efficiency review on its
production lines. The Group revised the estimated useful lives of some automation
machines from five to eight years, after refurbishments that will enable these
automation machines to remain in production for an additional three years. The revision
in estimate has been applied on a prospective basis from 1 January 2018. The effect of
the above revision on depreciation charge in current and future periods are as follows:
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Net gains from fair value adjustments recognised in profit or loss 489 129 IAS 40.76.d
Transfer to property, plant and equipment (Note 13) (300) – IAS 40.76.f
Exchange differences 1 1 IAS 40.76.e
At 31 December 4,645 3,955
Income statement:
Rental income from investment properties:
- Minimum lease payments 294 246
- Contingent rent based on tenants’ turnover 21 45 IAS 17.56.b
(72) (65)
The Group has no restrictions on the realisability of its investment properties and no IAS 40.75.g
contractual obligations to purchase, construct or develop investment property or for IAS 40.75.h
repairs, maintenance or enhancements.
Unexpired
Description and Location Existing Use Tenure lease term
8-storey shopping podium, 3 basements and twin 27-storey Shops Leasehold 983 years
office towers along South Park, Singapore
18-storey office tower along Xujing Road, Qingpu District, Offices Leasehold 58 years
Shanghai
Commentary
Contractual obligations relating to investment properties
Contractual obligations to purchase, construct or develop investment property or for repairs, IAS 40.75.h
maintenance or enhancements should be disclosed, if applicable.
Additions to investment properties
Additions to investment properties resulting from: i) acquisitions of properties; ii) subsequent
IAS 40.76.a and
expenditure recognised in the carrying amount of an asset; and iii) acquisitions through
b
business combinations should be disclosed separately.
Valuation of investment properties
When a valuation obtained for investment property is adjusted significantly for the purpose of IAS 40.77
the financial statements, for example to avoid double-counting of assets or liabilities that are
recognised as separate assets and liabilities, the entity should disclose a reconciliation between
the valuation obtained and the adjusted valuation included in the financial statements, showing
separately the aggregate amount of any recognised lease obligations that have been added
back, and any other significant adjustments.
If there has been no such valuation performed by an independent valuer, that fact should be IAS 40.75.e
disclosed.
List of properties held for investment
This disclosure is only required for entities listed on the SGX-ST, where the aggregate value for
SGX 1207.11
all properties for development, sale or for investment purposes held by the entity represent
more than 15% of the value of the consolidated net tangible assets, or contribute more than
15% of the consolidated pre-tax operating profit. This disclosure may be included in other parts
of the entity’s annual report instead.
Group
Deferred
Club Development
Goodwill Brands Membership Costs Total
IAS 1.77
$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
Cost:
At 1 January 2017 245 240 100 984 1,569 IAS 38.118.c
At 31 December 2017 and 1 January 2018 250 245 100 1,196 1,791 IAS 38.118.c
Additions:
- Internal development – – – 200 200 IAS 38.118.e.i
Electronic components
segment Property segment Total
The recoverable amounts of the CGUs have been determined based on value in use IAS 36.130.e. 134.c
calculations using cash flow projections from financial budgets approved by management and d.iii
covering a five-year period. The pre-tax discount rate applied to the cash flow projections
and the forecasted growth rates used to extrapolate cash flow projections beyond the
five-year period are as follows:
Pre-tax discount rates 11.3% 11.1% 11.2% 12.3% 12.8% 12.6% IAS 36.134.d.v
Commentary:
The disclosure of a description, the carrying amount and remaining amortisation period are IAS 38.122.b
required for any individual intangible asset that is material to the entity’s financial
statements.
If some or all of the carrying amount of goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite useful IAS 36.135
lives is allocated across multiple CGUs (groups of units), and the amount so allocated to each
unit (group of units) is not significant in comparison with the entity’s total carrying amount of
goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, that fact shall be disclosed, together
with the aggregate carrying amount of goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite useful
lives allocated to those CGUs (group of units). In addition, if the recoverable amounts of any
of those CGUs (group of units) are based on the same key assumption(s) and the aggregate
carrying amount of goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite useful lives allocated to them
is significant in comparison with the entity’s total carrying amount of goodwill or intangible
assets with indefinite useful lives, an entity shall disclose that fact, together with:
(a) The aggregate carrying amount of goodwill allocated to those units (groups of units)
(b) The aggregate carrying amount of intangible assets with indefinite useful lives allocated
to those units (groups of units)
(c) A description of the key assumption(s)
(d) A description of management’s approach to determining the value(s) assigned to the
key assumption(s), whether those value(s) reflect past experience or, if appropriate,
are consistent with external sources of information, and, if not, how and why they differ
from past experience or external sources if information.
(e) If a reasonably possible change in the key assumption(s) would cause the aggregate of
the units’ (groups of units’) carrying amounts to exceed the aggregate of their
recoverable amounts:
(i) The amount by which the aggregate of the units’ (group of units’) recoverable
amounts exceeds the aggregate of their carrying amounts.
(ii) The value(s) assigned to the key assumption(s).
(iii) The amount by which the value(s) assigned to the key assumption(s) must change,
after incorporating any consequential effects of the change on the other variables
used to measure recoverable amount, in order for the aggregate of the unit’s
(groups of units’) recoverable amounts to be equal to the aggregate of their
carrying amounts.
IAS 36.136
Provided specified criteria are met, if the most recent detailed calculation made in a
preceding period of the recoverable amount of a CGU (group of units) is used in the
impairment test for that unit (group of units) in the current period, the disclosures required
in the financial statements by paragraphs 134 and 135 relate to the carried forward
calculation of recoverable amount.
If a reasonably possible change in any key assumptions used by management would cause the IAS 36.134.f
carrying values of CGUs to materially exceed the recoverable amounts, an entity should
disclose
- the amount by which the CGU’s recoverable amount exceeds its carrying amount,
- the value assigned to the key assumption,
- the amount by which the value assigned to the key assumption must change, after
incorporating any consequential effects of that change on the other variables used to
measure recoverable amount, in order for the CGU’s recoverable amount to be equal to
its carrying amount.
Recoverable amount of CGU containing goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite lives
determined based on fair value less costs to sell (continued)
In this illustration, the recoverable amounts of such CGUs were determined based on value IAS 36.134.e
in use calculations. If an entity uses fair value less costs of disposal to measure the
recoverable amount of CGU and the fair value less costs of disposal is not determined using
a quoted price, the entity should disclose the valuation technique(s) and other information
including: the key assumption used; a description of management’s approach to each key
assumption (whether those values reflect past experience or are consistent with external
information, and if not, how and why they differ); the level of fair value hierarchy and the
reason(s) for changing valuation techniques, if there is any change, are required to be
provided in the financial statements.
Illustrative note disclosure:
The recoverable amounts of CGU A, CGU B and CGU C are determined based on fair
value less costs of disposal of the CGUs. To calculate these values, an appropriate
multiple was applied to the maintainable operating earnings of the CGUs. The fair value
less costs of disposal of the CGUs are determined by applying an appropriate market
multiple to its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA),
which management believes is sustainable in view of the current and anticipated
business conditions.
The fair value less costs of disposal of CGU A, CGU B and CGU C are estimated based
on current EBITDAs and market multiple of X.XX. The market multiples are calculated
based on the median of comparable companies’ indications, after adjustments for
differences in risks and growth. The control premium of XX% was calculated based on
the investment climate, industry dynamic and recent comparable transactions. The
discount rate of XX% has been derived based on studies of liquidity discounts and
adjusted for the size of the Company. The fair value derived is categorises under Level
3 of the fair value hierarchy.
If fair value less costs to sell is determined using discounted cash flow projections, the
following information shall also be disclosed:
- The period over which management has projected cash flows
- The growth rate used to extrapolate cash flow projections
- The discount rate(s) applied to the cash flow projections
IAS 36.134.d.iv
Forecasted growth rates used to extrapolate cash flow projections beyond the five-year period
The entity is required to disclose the justification if the growth rate used to extrapolate
cash flows projections beyond the period covered by the most recent budgets/forecasts
exceeds the long-term average growth rate for the products, industries, or countries in
which the entity operates.
Illustrative note disclosure:
The growth rate used to extrapolate the cash flows of the electronics component
segment exceeds the average growth rate for the industry in which the electronics
segment operates by three quarters of a percentage point. Management of the
electronics component segment believes this growth rate is justified based on the
acquisition of XXX Limited that has resulted in the control of an industry patent,
preventing other entities from manufacturing a specialised product for a period of 10
years with the option for renewal after the 10 years period have expired.
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Cost:
At 1 January 6,500 6,360
Exchange differences 220 140
At 31 December 6,720 6,500
Accumulated amortisation:
At 1 January 767 630
Amortisation for the year 132 130
Exchange differences 10 7
At 31 December 909 767
31 December 1 January
2018 2017 2017
$’000 $’000 $’000
Amount to be amortised:
- Not later than one year 137 132 130
- Later than one year but not later than five years 548 528 526
IAS 17.35.d
- Later than five years 5,126 5,073 5,074
The Group has land use rights over two plots of state-owned land in People’s Republic of
China (PRC) where the Group’s PRC manufacturing and storage facilities reside. The land
use rights are not transferable and have a remaining tenure of 43 years (31 December
2017: 44 years, 1 January 2017: 45 years).
Company
31 December 1 January
2018 2017 2017
$’000 $’000 $’000
IAS 27.10.a
Shares, at cost 11,132 11,042 11,036
Discount on loans to subsidiaries 540 540 540
Issuance of shares for acquisition of subsidiary 1,475 –
Impairment losses (1,000) (1,000) (1,000)
12,147 10,582 10,576
XYZ Land Pte Ltd i Singapore Investment holding 100 100 100
Rubber Hose Pte Ltd i Singapore Installation of rubber 100 100 100
hose
Lion Land Pte Ltd i Singapore Property investment 100 100 100
i
Audited by Ernst & Young LLP, Singapore
SGX 717
ii
Audited by member firms of EY Global in the respective countries
* The Group holds 25% ownership interest in MSAX Sdn Bhd in 2017 and account for it as an associate (Note 19).
The Group has the following subsidiaries that have NCI that are material to the Group. IFRS 12.B10.a
31 December 2017:
Significant restrictions:
The nature and extent of significant restrictions on the Group’s ability to use or IFRS 12.10.b.i
IFRS 12.13
access assets and settle liabilities of subsidiaries with material non-controlling
interests are:
Cash and cash equivalents of $49,000 (31 December 2017: $35,000, 1 January
2017: $40,000) held in People’s Republic of China are subject to local exchange
control regulations. These regulations places restriction on the amount of currency
being exported other than through dividends.
Commentary (continued):
An entity shall disclose information that enables users of its consolidated financial statements IFRS 12.10
(a) to understand:
i. the composition of the group; and
ii. the interest that non-controlling interests have in the group’s activities and cash flows;
and
(b) to evaluate:
i. the nature and extent of significant restrictions on its ability to access or use assets, and
settle liabilities, of the group
ii. the nature of, and changes in, the risks associated with its interests in consolidated
structured entities
iii. the consequences of changes in its ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in
a loss of control; and
iv. the consequences of losing control of a subsidiary during the reporting period.
An entity shall decide, in the light of its circumstances, how much detail it provides to satisfy the IFRS 12.B2
information needs of users, how much emphasis it places on different aspects of the
requirements and how it aggregates the information. It is necessary to strike a balance between
burdening financial statements with excessive detail that may not assist users of financial
statements and obscuring information as a result of too much aggregation.
In this illustration, it is assumed that there was no reversal of impairment loss on investment in IAS 36.130.a
subsidiaries. Where applicable, an entity should disclose the events and circumstances that led to
the reversal of such impairment loss.
An entity shall disclose the country of incorporation if different from the principal place of IAS 112.12.b
business of the subsidiary. IAS 27.17.b.ii
An entity shall disclose the proportion of voting rights if different from the proportion of IAS 112.12.d
ownership interests held. IAS 27.17.b.iii
The summarised financial information presented shall be the amounts before inter-company IFRS 12.B11
eliminations.
Commentary (continued):
Nature of the risks associated with an entity’s interests in consolidated structured entities
In this illustration, the Group does not consolidate any structured entity. If the Group provides
financial support to consolidated structured entities, please refer to the following disclosure
requirements:
An entity shall disclose the terms of any contractual arrangements that could require the parent IFRS 12.14
or its subsidiaries to provide financial support to a consolidated structured entity, including events
or circumstances that could expose the reporting entity to a loss (e.g. liquidity arrangements or
credit rating triggers associated with obligations to purchase assets of the structured entity or
provide financial support).
If during the reporting period a parent or any of its subsidiaries has, without having a contractual IFRS 12.15
obligation to do so, provided financial or other support to a consolidated structured entity (e.g.
purchasing assets of or instruments issued by the structured entity), the entity shall disclose:
(a) the type and amount of support provided, including situations in which the parents or its
subsidiaries assisted the structured entity in obtaining financial support; and
(b) the reasons for providing the support.
If during the reporting period a parent or any of its subsidiaries has, without having a contractual IFRS 12.16
obligation to do so, provided financial or other support to a previously unconsolidated structured
entity and that provision of support resulted in the entity controlling the structured entity, the
entity shall disclose an explanation of the relevant factors in reaching that decision.
An entity shall disclose any current intentions to provide financial or other support to a IFRS 12.17
consolidated structured entity, including intentions to assist the structured entity in obtaining
financial support.
Investment entities
In this illustration, the Company does not meet the definition of an investment entity and
therefore does not apply the exception to consolidation under IFRS 10. When a parent determines
that it is an investment entity in accordance with IFRS 10, the following disclosures are required.
(a) Information about significant judgements and assumptions it has made in determining that it
IFRS 12.9A
is an investment entity. If the investment entity does not have one or more of the typical
characteristics of an investment entity, it shall disclose its reasons for concluding that it is
nevertheless an investment entity.
(b) When an entity becomes, or ceases to be, an investment entity, it shall disclose the change of IFRS 12.9B
investment entity status and the reasons for the change. In addition, an entity that becomes
an investment entity shall disclose the effect of the change of status on the financial
statements for the period presented including:
- The total fair value, as of the date of change of status, of the subsidiaries that cease to be
consolidated
- The total gain or loss, if any, calculated in accordance with paragraph B101 of IFRS 10
- The line item(s) in profit or loss in which the gain or loss is recognised (if not presented
separately)
Commentary (continued):
Investment entities (continued)
(c) For each unconsolidated subsidiary, an investment entity shall disclose: IFRS 12.19B
3,005
$’000
Effect of the acquisition of MSAX on cash flows
Total consideration for 55% equity interest acquired 2,325 IAS 7.40.a
IAS 7.43
Less: non-cash consideration (2,125)
Consideration settled in cash 200 IAS 7.40.b
Less: Cash and cash equivalents of subsidiay acquired (417) IAS 7.40.c
consideration has been agreed. Additional cash payments shall be payable to the
previous owner of MSAX of:
a) $385,000, if the entity generates $1,000,000 profit before tax for a period of IFRS 3.B64.g.iii
$301,000 to the Group’s profit for the year. If the business combination had taken IFRS 3.B64.q.ii
place at the beginning of the year, the revenue from continuing operations would
have been $144,720,000 and the Group’s profit from continuing operations, net of
tax would have been $5,801,000.
Provisional accounting of the acquisition of MSAX
A brand has been identified as an intangible asset arising from this acquisition. The IFRS 3.B67.a
Group has engaged an independent valuer to determine the fair value of the brand.
As at 31 December 2018, the fair value of the brand amounting to $500,000 has
been determined on a provisional basis as the final results of the independent
valuation have not been received by the date the financial statements was authorised
for issue. Goodwill arising from this acquisition, the carrying amount of the brand,
deferred tax liability, and amortisation of the brand will be adjusted accordingly on a
retrospective basis when the valuation of the brand is finalised.
$’000
Commentary:
Acquisition of subsidiary
An entity shall also make disclosures of business combinations in accordance to IFRS 3.B64 IFRS 3.59.b and B66
even if they were effected after the end of the reporting date but before the financial
statements are authorised for issue, unless the initial accounting for the business
combination is incomplete at the time the financial statements are authorised for issue. In
that situation, the entity shall describe which disclosures cannot be made and the reasons
why they cannot be made.
For individually immaterial business combinations occurring during the reporting period that IFRS 3.B65
are material collectively, an entity shall disclose in aggregate the information required by
IFRS 3.B64.e-q.
If the acquisition results in a bargain purchase instead of goodwill recognised, the acquirer IFRS 3.B64.n
shall disclose the amount of the gain recognised and the line item in the consolidated
statement of comprehensive income in which the gain is recognised, and a description of the
reasons why the transaction resulted in a gain.
Acquisition of subsidiary
An acquirer shall also disclose information that enables users of its financial statements to IFRS 3.61 and B67
evaluate the financial effects of adjustments recognised in the current reporting period
that relate to business combinations that occurred in the current period or previous
reporting periods.
Illustrative disclosure for adjustments to initial accounting for a business combination that IFRS 3.B67.a
was determined provisionally in the previous reporting period:
The purchase price allocation of the acquisition of Acquiree Group (Acquiree) in the
financial year ended 31 December 2018 were provisional as the Group had sought an
independent valuation for the land and buildings owned by Acquiree. The results of this
valuation had not been received at the date the 2018 financial statements were
authorised for issue. The valuation of the land and buildings was received in April 2018
and showed that the fair value at the date of acquisition was $XXX, an increase of
$XXX compared to the provisional value.
The 2017 comparative information has been restated to reflect this adjustment. The
value of the land and buildings increased by $XXX, there was an increase in the
deferred tax liability of $XXX and an increase in non-controlling interest of $XXX.
There was also a corresponding reduction in goodwill of $XXX, to give total goodwill
arising on the acquisition of $XXX. The depreciation charge on the buildings from the
acquisition date to 31 December 2017 increased by $XXX.
In this illustration, the Group has elected to measure non-controlling interest arising from
acquisition of MSAX at the non-controlling interest’s proportionate share of MSAX’s
identifiable net assets. The following is an illustrative disclosure when an entity chooses to
measure non-controlling interest arising in a business combination at fair value:
Fair value of non-controlling interest in Acquiree
The fair value of the non-controlling interest in Acquiree, an unlisted company, was
IFRS 3.B64.o.ii
estimated by applying the income approach that is corroborated by market approach.
The fair value estimates are based on:
- A discount rate range of XX% to XX%;
- Terminal value, calculated based on the long term sustainable growth rate for the
industry ranging from XX% to XX%, which has been used to determine income for
the future years; and
- Adjustments because of the lack of control and marketability that market
participants would consider when estimating the fair value of the non-controlling
interest in Acquiree.
On 13 June 2018, the Group disposed of a 5% equity interest in XYZ China Co. Ltd.
Following the disposal, the Group still controls XYZ China Co. Ltd., retaining 70% of the
ownership interests. The transaction has been accounted for as an equity transaction with
non-controlling interests, resulting in:
2018
$’000
Proceeds from sale of 5% ownership interest XXX
Net assets attributable to NCI (XXX)
Increase in equity attributable to parent XXX
Represented by:
Decrease in foreign currency translation reserve (XXX)
Decrease in asset revaluation reserve (XXX)
Other reserves XXX
Increase in equity attributable to parent entity XXX
2018
$’000
Property, plant and equipment XXX
Trade and other receivables XXX
Inventories XXX
Cash and short-term deposits XXX
XXX
Trade and other payables (XXX)
Income tax payable (XXX)
Carrying value of net assets (XXX)
Gain on disposal:
2018
$’000
The gain or loss on disposal attributable to measuring the retained interest amounted IFRS 12.19
to $XXX was included in other income in profit or loss.
IFRS 12.21.b.ii
Summarised financial information in respect of XYZ-ABC JV Co. Ltd. based on its IFRS IFRS 12.B12
financial statements, and reconciliation with the carrying amount of the investment in the IFRS 12.B13
consolidated financial statements are as follows:
Group
31 December 1 January
2018 2017 2017
$’000 $’000 $’000
Cash and cash equivalents 176 132 132
Trade receivables 542 792 755
Current assets 718 924 887
Non-current assets excluding goodwill 3,220 2,898 2,516
Goodwill 100 100 100
Non-current assets 3,320 2,998 2,616
Total assets 4,038 3,922 3,503
Current liabilities (200) (412) (295)
Non-current liabilities (excluding trade, other payables
and provisions) (490) (480) (480)
Other non-current liabilities (100) (100) (100)
Total non-current liabilities (590) (580) (580)
Total liabilities (790) (992) (875)
Net assets 3,248 2,930 2,628
Net assets excluding goodwill 3,148 2,830 2,528
Proportion of the Group’s ownership 50% 50% 50%
Group’s share of net assets 1,574 1,415 1,264
Goodwill on acquisition 100 100 100
Carrying amount of the investment 1,674 1,515 1,364
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Revenue 428 394
Operating expenses (106) (130)
Interest expense (10) (7)
Profit before tax 312 257
Income tax expense (10) (5)
Profit after tax 302 252
Other comprehensive income - -
Total comprehensive income 302 252
Dividends of $60,000 (2017: $50,000) were received from XYZ-ABC JV Co.Ltd. XYZ- IFRS 12.B12.a
ABC JV Co. Ltd is restricted by regulatory requirements by paying dividends greater than IFRS 12.22.a
50% of the annual profit.
Commentary:
In this illustration, the Group does not have investment in joint operation.
The following disclosures are required for investments in joint operations:
IFRS 12.21.a
(a) the name of the joint operation
(b) the nature of the entity’s relationship with the joint operations, (by, for example,
describing the nature of the activities of the joint operation and whether it is strategic to
the entity’s activities)
Other disclosures required for joint ventures are not applicable for joint operations.
For interests in joint arrangements, an entity shall disclose information that enables users of IFRS 12.20
its financial statements to evaluate:
(a) the nature, extent and financial effects of its interests in joint arrangements, including
the nature and effects of its contractual relationship with the other investors with joint
control of joint arrangements; and
(b) the nature of, and changes in, the risks associated with its interests in joint ventures.
If the joint venture is accounted for using the equity method, the entity shall disclose the fair IFRS 12.21.b.iii
value of its investment in the joint venture or associate, if there is a quoted market price for
the investment.
In this illustration, the Group have only one investment in joint venture which is material.
IFRS 12.B16
The following disclosures are required, in aggregate for all individually immaterial joint
ventures:
(a) the carrying amount of its interests
(b) its share of the joint ventures’
i. profit or loss from continuing operations
ii. post-tax profit or loss from discontinued operations
iii. other comprehensive income
iv. total comprehensive income
Commentary (continued):
In this illustration, the Group does not have any unrecognised share of losses of its IFRS 12.22.c
investment in joint venture.
If the Group have stopped recognising its share of losses of its joint venture when applying
the equity method, it shall disclose the unrecognised share of losses of the joint venture,
both for the reporting period and cumulatively.
An entity shall disclose the proportion of voting rights held for each joint arrangement if IFRS 12.21.a.iv
different from the proportion of ownership interests held.
An entity shall disclose the principal place of business for each joint arrangement if different IFRS 12.21.a.iii
from the country of incorporation of the joint arrangement.
An entity may present the summarised financial information on the basis of the joint IFRS 12.B15
venture’s financial statements if:
(a) the entity measures its interest in the joint venture at fair value; and
(b) the joint venture does not prepare IFRS financial statements and preparation on that
basis would be impracticable or cause undue cost.
In that case, the entity shall disclose the basis on which the summarised financial information
has been prepared.
In this illustration, the joint venture does not have depreciation and amortisation and interest IFRS 12.B13
income. For each material joint venture, an entity shall disclose the following information:
i. cash and cash equivalents
ii. current financial liabilities (excluding trade and other payables and provisions)
iii. non-financial liabilities (excluding trade and other payables and provisions)
iv. depreciation and amortisation
v. interest income
vi. interest expense
vii. income tax expense or income
An entity shall also disclose the nature and extent of any significant restrictions (e.g. IFRS 12.22.a
resulting from borrowing arrangements, regulatory requirements or contractual
arrangements between investors with joint control of a joint venture) on the ability of joint
ventures to transfer funds to the entity in the form of cash dividends, or to repay loans and
advances.
IFRS 12.21
Country of Proportion (%) of ownership
IAS 27.17.b
Name incorporation Principal activities interest
31 December 1 January
2018 2017 2017
Held through subsidiaries:
i
Audited by Ernst & Young LLP, Singapore SGX 717
ii
Audited by member firm of EY Global in Malaysia
*The Group holds 80% of ownership interest in MSAX Sdn Bhd in 2017 and accounts for it as a subsidiary
(Note 17.a).
The activities of the associates are strategic to the Group activities. The Group has not IFRS 12.21.a.ii
IFRS 12.22.c
recognised losses relating to Heart Land Ltd where its share of losses exceeds the Group’s
interest in this associate. The Group’s cumulative share of unrecognised losses at the end
of the reporting period was $50,000 (31 December 2017: $35,000, 1 January 2017:
$28,000), of which $15,000 (2017: $5,000) was the share of the current year’s losses.
The Group has no obligation in respect of these losses.
The Group has not recognised its share of the current year profit of $8,000 (2017: nil)
relating to Drill Pte Ltd as the Group’s cumulative share of unrecognised losses with
respect to that associate was $17,000 (31 December 2017: $25,000, 1 January 2017:
$20,000) at the end of the reporting period.
Dividends of $40,000 (2017: $30,000) and $60,000 (2017: $50,000) were received IFRS 12.B12.a
from QSpeed Pte Ltd and HKI Pte Ltd respectively. QSpeed Pte Ltd. is restricted by IFRS 12.22.a
regulatory requirements by paying dividends greater than 60% of the annual profit.
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Profit or loss after tax from continuing operations 1,237 555
Other comprehensive income 223 174
Total comprehensive income 1,460 729
IFRS 12.21.b.i
The summarised financial information in respect of QSpeed Pte Ltd and HKI Pte Ltd, based on its IFRS IFRS 12.B12
IFRS 12.B14
financial statements and a reconciliation with the carrying amount of the investment in the
consolidated financial statements are as follows:
Commentary:
Investment in associates
For interests in associates, an entity shall disclose information that enables users of its IFRS 12.20
financial statements to evaluate:
(a) the nature, extent and financial effects of its interests in associates, including the
nature and effects of its contractual relationship with the other investors with
significant influence over associates; and
(b) the nature of, and changes in, the risks associated with its interests in associates.
If the associate is accounted for using the equity method, the entity shall disclose the fair IFRS 12.21.b.iii
value of its investment in the associate, if there is a quoted market price for the
investment.
An entity shall disclose the principal place of business for each associate if different from IFRS 12.21.a.iii
the country of incorporation of the associate.
An entity shall disclose the proportion of voting rights held for each associate if different IFRS 12.21.a.iv
from the proportion of ownership interests held.
If the Group have stopped recognising its share of losses of its associate when applying the IFRS 12.22.c
equity method, it shall disclose the unrecognised share of losses of the associate, both for
the reporting period and cumulatively.
An entity shall also disclose the nature and extent of any significant restrictions (e.g. IFRS 12.22.a
resulting from borrowing arrangements, regulatory requirements or contractual
arrangements between investors with significant influence over an associate) on the ability
of associates to transfer funds to the entity in the form of cash dividends, or to repay loans
and advances.
In this illustration, the Group does not have any immaterial associate that is classified as
discontinued operation.
The following disclosures are required, in aggregate for all individually immaterial IFRS 12.B16
associates:
(a) the carrying amount of its interests
(b) its share of the associates’
i. profit or loss from continuing operations
ii. post-tax profit or loss from discontinued operations
iii. other comprehensive income
iv. total comprehensive income
These disclosures above shall be disclosed separately for associates.
An entity may present the summarised financial information on the basis of the associate’s IFRS 12.B15
financial statements if:
(a) the entity measures its interest in the associate at fair value
(b) the associate does not prepare IFRS financial statements and preparation on that basis
would be impracticable or cause undue cost.
In that case, the entity shall disclose the basis on which the summarised financial
information has been prepared.
Revaluations to fair
value:
- Freehold land and
buildings (1,159) (903) (431) – – – – –
- Available-for-sale
financial assets (150) (94) (68) – – – – –
Fair value adjustments
on acquisition of
subsidiary (48) – – – – – – –
Convertible redeemable
preference shares (9) (13) - (4) (3) (9) (13) -
Undistributed earnings
of associates (176) (145) (125) 31 20 – – –
Other items (8) (5) (2) 3 3 – – –
At the end of the reporting period, the Group has tax losses of approximately $867,000
(31 December 2017: $682,000, 1 January 2017: $623,000) that are available for offset
against future taxable profits of the companies in which the losses arose, for which no
deferred tax asset is recognised due to uncertainty of its recoverability. The use of these
tax losses is subject to the agreement of the tax authorities and compliance with certain
provisions of the tax legislation of the respective countries in which the companies
operate. The tax losses have no expiry date except for an amount of $101,000
(December 2017: $101,000, 1 January 2017: $101,000) which will expire in 2018.
Unrecognised temporary differences relating to investments in subsidiaries and joint IAS 12.81.f
venture
At the end of the reporting period, no deferred tax liability (31 December 2017: nil,
1 January 2017: nil) has been recognised for taxes that would be payable on the
undistributed earnings of certain of the Group’s subsidiaries and joint venture as:
- The Group has determined that undistributed earnings of its subsidiaries will not be
distributed in the foreseeable future; and
- The joint venture of the Group cannot distribute its earnings until it obtains the
consent of both the joint venturers. At the end of the reporting period, the Group
does not foresee giving such consent.
Such temporary differences for which no deferred tax liability has been recognised IAS 12.87
aggregate to $450,000 (31 December 2017: $340,000, 1 January 2017: $320,000).
The deferred tax liability is estimated to be $81,000 (31 December 2017: $68,000,
1 January 2017: $60,000).
Tax consequences of proposed dividends
IAS 12.81.i
There are no income tax consequences (2017: nil) attached to the dividends to the
shareholders proposed by the Company but not recognised as a liability in the financial
statements (Note 43).
Commentary:
Trade receivables
Trade receivables are non-interest bearing and are generally on 30 to 90 days’ terms.
They are recognised at their original invoice amounts which represent their fair values on
IFRS 7.7 and 31
initial recognition.
At the end of the reporting period, trade receivables arising from export sales amounting
to $1,560,000 (31 December 2017: $1,750,000, 1 January 2017: $1,620,000) are
IFRS 7.36.b
arranged to be settled via letters of credit issued by reputable banks in countries where
the customers are based. Trade receivables from first-time customers that are insured by
trade credit insurance underwritten by a reputable insurer in Singapore amount to
$520,000 (31 December 2017: nil, 1 January 2017: nil) at the end of the reporting
period.
Group Company
- Amounts due from subsidiaries and loans to subsidiaries are unsecured, bear interest
of SIBOR + 1% p.a. (2017: SIBOR + 1% p.a.) and are to be settled in cash. The former
are due on 30 June 2021 while the latter are due on 30 June 2022.
- Loans to associates bear interest at SIBOR + 2% p.a. (2017: SIBOR + 2% p.a.), have an
average maturity of 1.5 years (2017: 2.5 years), secured by corporate guarantees
issued by their respective holding companies and are to be settled in cash.
- Loan to a fellow subsidiary is unsecured, bears interest at SIBOR + 2% p.a. (2017:
SIBOR + 2% p.a.), repayable on 30 September 2020 and is to be settled in cash.
- Staff loans are unsecured and non-interest bearing. Non-current amounts have an
average maturity of 1.5 years (2017: 1.5 years). The loans are recognised initially at
fair value. The difference between the fair value and the absolute loan amount
represents payment for services to be rendered during the period of the loan and is
recorded as part of prepaid operating expenses.
Receivables that are past due but not impaired
IFRS 7.37.a
The Group has trade receivables amounting to $5,760,000 as at 31 December 2017 and IFRS 7.36.b
$6,852,000 as at 1 January 2017 that are past due at the end of the reporting period but IFRS 7.IG28
not impaired. These receivables are unsecured and the analysis of their aging at the end
of the reporting period is as follows:
Group
31 December 1 January
2017 2017
$’000 $’000
Trade receivables that are individually determined to be impaired at the end of the IFRS 7.37.b
IFRS 7.36.b
reporting period relate to debtors that are in significant financial difficulties and have
defaulted on payments. These receivables are not secured by any collateral or credit
enhancements.
As at 31 December 2017, the Group and the Company have provided an allowance of IFRS 7.37.b
IFRS 7.36.b
$100,000 (1 January 2017: $100,000) for impairment of the unsecured loan to a fellow IAS 24.18.c
subsidiary company with a nominal amount of $1,600,000 (2017: $1,600,000). This
related party has been suffering significant financial losses for the current and past two
financial years.
Expected credit losses
The movement in allowance for expected credit losses of trade receivables and contract IFRS 7.35H
assets computed based on lifetime ECL are as follows:
Group
Trade Contract
receivables assets
2018 2018
Movement in allowance accounts: $’000 $’000
At 1 January 753 15
Charge for the year 90 10
IFRS 35I.c
Written off (135) -
Exchange differences (15) 5
At 31 December 693 30
Receivables subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement that are not otherwise
set-off
The Group regularly purchases electronic raw materials from and sell electronic products IFRS 7.13E
to PQR Pte Ltd. Both parties do not have an arrangement to settle the amount due to or
from each other on a net basis but have the right to set off in the case of default and
insolvency or bankruptcy.
The Group’s trade receivables and trade payables subject to an enforceable master
netting arrangement that are not otherwise set-off are as follows:
Commentary:
When an entity holds collateral (of financial or non-financial assets) and is permitted to sell
IFRS 7.15
or repledge the collateral in the absence of default by the owner of the collateral, it shall
disclose: (a) the fair value of the collateral held; (b) the fair value of any such collateral sold
or repledged, and whether the entity has an obligation to return it; and (c) the terms and
conditions associated with its use of the collateral.
When an entity obtains financial or non-financial assets during the period by taking
IFRS 7.38
possession of collateral it holds as security or calling on other credit enhancements (e.g.,
guarantees), and such assets meet the recognition criteria under IFRS, an entity shall
disclose for such assets held at the reporting date:
(a) the nature and carrying amount of the assets; and
(b) when the assets are not readily convertible into cash, its policies for disposing of such
assets or for using them in its operations.
The above disclosure required for financial assets obtained by taking possession of collateral
or other credit enhancements are only applicable to assets still held at the reporting date.
An entity shall disclose a description of collateral held as security and of other credit
IFRS 7.36.b
enhancements, and their financial effect (e.g. a quantification of the extent to which
collateral or other credit enhancements mitigate credit risk) in respect of the amount that
best represents the maximum exposure to credit risk.
Ageing analysis of financial assets that are past due but not impaired
IFRS 7 requires the disclosure of an analysis by class of the age of financial assets that are IFRS 7.37.a and IG
past due but not impaired. Any entity uses its judgement to determine the appropriate time 28
bands to be disclosed.
IFRS 7 requires disclosure requirements where financial assets are impaired by credit losses IFRS 7.16
and the entity records the impairment in a separate account (e.g., an allowance account
used to record individual impairments or a similar account used to record a collective
impairment of assets) rather than directly reducing the carrying amount of the asset. In
such circumstances, the entity shall disclose a reconciliation of changes in that account (the
“reconciliation”) during the period for each class of financial assets.
In this illustration, the entity has presented the reconciliation of changes in the two
allowance accounts that it has used to record impairment of trade receivables, i.e., trade
receivables that are collectively impaired and those that are individually impaired.
Commentary (continued):
IFRS 7 requires an entity to disclose information to enable users of its financial statements IFRS 7.13B
to evaluate the effect or potential effect of netting arrangements on the entity’s financial
position which includes the effect or potential effect of rights of set-off associated with the
entity’s recognised financial assets and recognised financial liabilities that are within the
scope of paragraph 13A of IFRS 7.
These disclosures are required for all recognised financial instruments that are set off in IFRS 7.13A
accordance with paragraph 42 of IAS 32 and also apply to recognised financial instruments
that are subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement
irrespective of whether they are set off in accordance with paragraph 42 of IAS 32.
To meet the objective above, an entity shall disclose, at the end of the reporting period, the IFRS 7.13C
following quantitative information separately for recognised financial assets and recognised
financial liabilities that are within the scope of paragraph 13A of IFRS 7:
(a) the gross amounts of those recognised financial assets and recognised financial
liabilities;
(b) the amounts that are set off in accordance with the criteria in IAS 32.42 when
determining the net amounts presented in the balance sheet;
(c) the net amounts presented in the balance sheet;
(d) the amounts subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar
arrangement that are not otherwise include in (b), including
i. amounts related to recognised financial instruments that do not meet some or all of
the offsetting criteria of IAS 32.42; and
ii. amounts related to financial collateral (including cash collateral); and
(e) the net amounts after deducting the amounts in (d) from the amounts in (c) above.
The information above shall be presented in a tabular format, separately for financial assets
and financial liabilities, unless another format is more appropriate.
The total amount disclosed for an instrument in accordance with (d) above shall be limited to IFRS 7.13D
the net amounts presented in the balance sheet for that instrument.
Group
2018
$’000
At fair value through profit or loss
- Equity securities (quoted) 3,258 IFRS 7.8.a.i
At fair value through other comprehensive income
- Other debt securities (unquoted) 1,563 IFRS 7.8.h.i
2,402
At amortised cost
IFRS 7.8.f
- 3% p.a. SGD government bonds due 31 March 2020 (quoted) 660
3,062
through other comprehensive income at the end of the reporting period is as follows:
Group
2018
$’000
At fair value through other comprehensive income
- Equity securities (unquoted)
IFRS 7.11A.a
B9SG Pte Ltd 139 IFRS 7.11A.c
FRU Co. Ltd 700
839
The Group has elected to measure these equity securities at FVOCI due to the Group’s IFRS 7.11A.b
intention to hold these equity instruments for long-term appreciation.
During the year, the Group disposed of its investments in equity instruments of IFRS 7.11B.a
BetterWork Pte Ltd due to favourable market condition. The fair value at the date of IFRS 7.11B.b
IFRS 7.11B.c
derecognition amounted to $119,000. The cumulative gain arising from the disposal IFRS 7.11A.e
amounted to $29,000 and were transferred from fair value adjustment reserve to
retained earnings.
The Group recognised a dividend of $20,000 from FRU Co. Ltd during the year and a IFRS 7.11A.d
dividend of $5,000 from Lotus Ltd prior to the disposal during the year.
Commentary:
Information such as interest rates and maturity dates of debt securities, and countries IFRS 7.7
where the equity securities are listed should be disclosed if material and enables the users
of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and extent of the risks arising from
financial instruments to which the entity is exposed to at the reporting date. In this
illustration, the countries where the equity securities are listed are disclosed in Note 40
Market price risk.
In this illustration, the Group does not have debt instrument designated as measured at fair IFRS 7.9
value through profit or loss a financial asset that would otherwise be measured at fair value
through other comprehensive income or amortised cost. If the Group has debt instrument
designated as such, it shall disclose:
(a) The maximum exposure to credit risk of the financial asset at the end of the reporting
period.
(b) The amount by which any related credit derivatives or similar instruments mitigate that
maximum exposure to credit risk
(c) The amount of change, during the period and cumulatively, in the fair value of the
financial asset that is attributable to changes in the credit risk of the financial asset
determined either
i. As the amount of change in its fair value that is not attributable to changes in
market conditions that give risk to market risk; or
ii. Using an alternative method that the entity believes more faithfully represents the
amount of change in its fair value that is attributable to changes in the credit risk of
the asset.
Changes in market conditions that give rise to market risk include changes in an
observed (benchmark) interest rate, commodity price, foreign exchange rate or index
of prices or rates
(d) The amount of the change in fair value of any related credit derivatives or similar
instruments that has occurred during the period and cumulatively since the financial
asset was designated.
Group
31 December 1 January
2017 2017
$’000 $’000
Current:
Held for trading investments IFRS 7.8.a.ii
Non-current:
Available-for-sale financial assets IFRS 7.8.d
2,456 2,980
Held-to-maturity investment
- 3% p.a. SGD government bonds due 31 March 2020 (quoted) 650 650 IFRS 7.8.b
3,106 3,630
Commentary:
IFRS 7 required disclosure of the carrying amounts of financial instruments under each of IFRS 7.8
the classification in IAS 39, either on the face of the balance sheet or in the notes. The
categories of financial instruments include financial assets and financial liabilities that are
classified as held for trading, those that are designated upon initial recognition as financial
assets or financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss, held-to-maturity
investments, loans and receivables, available-for-sale financial assets, and financial
liabilities measured at amortised cost. In this illustration, the disclosure requirement is met
in the respective notes to the financial statements (refer to this note, Note 21, 26 and 31).
Alternatively, the disclosure of the carrying amounts of financial instruments under each of
the classifications in IAS 39 may be presented in a separate centralised note.
Please refer to commentary no. 3 of Note 2.16 (c) Impairment of available-for-sale financial
assets.
31 December 1 January
2018 2017 2017
$’000 $’000 $’000
During the financial year, borrowing costs of $35,000 (2017: $33,000), arising from IAS 23.26.a and
borrowings obtained specifically for the development property were capitalised under b
“Development costs”. The rate used to determine the amount of borrowing costs eligible
for capitalisation was 7.5% (2017: 7.2%), which is the effective interest rate of the specific
borrowing.
IAS 2.36.h
The freehold land under development has been pledged as security for a bank loan (Note
30).
Commentary:
In this illustration, the entire amount included in development property is expected to be IAS 1.61
recovered or settled no more than twelve months after the reporting period.
If the amount includes amounts expected to be recovered more than twelve months after the
reporting period, an entity shall disclose the amount expected to be recovered more than
twelve months after the reporting period.
Borrowing costs capitalised
Please refer to commentary no. 2 of Note 13 Property plant and equipment.
Where the aggregate value for all properties for development, sale or for investment SGX 1207.11
purposes held by the entity represent more than 15% of the value of the consolidated net
tangible assets, or contribute more than 15% of the consolidated pre-tax operating profit,
entities listed on the SGX-ST are required to disclose further information regarding
development properties.
Illustrative disclosure pursuant to requirements of SGX 1207.11:
Group
31 December 1 January
2018 2017 2017
$’000 $’000 $’000
Balance sheet:
Raw materials (at cost) 4,432 4,992 4,852 IAS 2.36.b
The reversal of write-down of inventories was made when the related inventories were IAS 2.36.g
sold above their carrying amounts in 2018.
The Group has subjected finished goods amounting to $1,500,000 (31 December 2017: IAS 2.36.h
$1,500,000, 1 January 2017: $1,500,000), to a floating charge as security for bank
overdraft facilities (Note 30).
26. Derivatives
IFRS 7.7 and
Group 31
Forward currency
contracts 9,850 150 (22) 8,560 60 – 8,500 65 –
At the Company level, the carrying amount of financial liability at fair value through profit
or loss is the contingent consideration for business combination amounting to
$685,000 as at 31 December 2018 (31 December 2017: Nil, 1 January 2017: nil).
Forward currency contracts are used to hedge foreign currency risk arising from the
Group’s sales and purchases denominated in USD for which firm commitments existed at
the end of the reporting period, extending to March 2019 (31 December 2017: March
2018, 1 January 2017: 31 March 2017) (Note 40(d)).
The interest rate swap receives floating interest equal to SIBOR + 3% p.a. (31 December
2017: SIBOR + 3% p.a., 1 January 2017: SIBOR + 3% p.a.), pays a fixed rate of interest of
7.5% p.a. (31 December 2017: 7.5% p.a., 1 January 2017: 7.5%) and matures on 30
November 2019 (31 December 2017: 30 November 2018, 1 January 2017: 30
November 2017).
Commentary:
Cash at banks earns interest at floating rates based on daily bank deposit rates. Short-
term deposits are made for varying periods of between one day and three months,
depending on the immediate cash requirements of the Group and the Company, and earn
IFRS 7.7,31 and 34
interests at the respective short-term deposit rates. The weighted average effective
interest rates as at 31 December 2018 for the Group and the Company were 2.60% (31
December 2017: 2.80%, 1 January 2017: 2.70%) and 0.15% (31 December 2017: 0.20%,
1 January 2017: 0.18%) respectively. IFRS 7.34.a
Group Company
31 December 1 January 31 December 1 January
2018 2018
2017 2017 2017 2017
$’000 $’000
$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
United States Dollar 442 325 295 108 120 105
Renminbi 20 15 10 8 5 8
For the purpose of the consolidated cash flow statement, cash and cash equivalents IAS 7.45
comprise the following at the end of the reporting period:
Group
31 December 1 January
2018
2017 2017
Cash and short-term deposits: $’000
$’000 $’000
- Continuing operations 6,117 4,858 3,668
- Discontinued operation (Note 11) 250 – –
6,367 4,858 3,668
Bank overdrafts (Note 30) (498) (1,444) (1,436)
Cash and cash equivalents 5,869 3,414 2,232
Commentary:
In this illustration, it is assumed that the Group does not have any cash and cash
equivalents that are not available for use by the Group.
Where applicable, disclosure is required, together with a commentary by management, for
the amount of significant cash and cash equivalent balances held by the enterprise that are IAS 7.48
not available for use by the Group. There are various circumstances in which cash and cash
equivalent balances held by an enterprise are not available for use by the Group. Examples
include cash and cash equivalent balances held by a subsidiary that operates in a country IAS 7.49
where exchange controls or other legal restrictions apply when the balances are not
available for general use by the parent or other subsidiaries.
Cash and cash equivalents which are restricted in its use for more than twelve months shall
IAS 1.66.d
be classified as non-current assets.
Maintenance
warranties Legal claim Total
2018
Current 377 424 801
Non-current 1,525 – 1,525
1,902 424 2,326
31 December 2017
Current 295 – 295
Non-current 1,225 – 1,225
1,520 – 1,520
1 January 2017
Current 155 – 155
Non-current 1,630 – 1,630
1,785 – 1,785
Maintenance warranties
A provision is recognised for expected warranty claims on certain specialised electronic IAS 37.85
components sold during the last two years, based on past experience of the level of
repairs and returns. It is expected that most of these costs will be incurred in the next two
financial years and all will have been incurred within three years from the end of the
reporting period. Assumptions used to calculate the provision for maintenance warranties
were based on current sales levels and current information available about returns based
on the three-year warranty period for the relevant specialised electronic components
sold.
During the financial year, based on the earlier mentioned statistics and warranty claims
IAS 1.98.g
experience, management concluded that the provision for maintenance warranties
exceeded the amount necessary to cover warranty claims on products sold during the last
two years. Accordingly, $60,000 (2017: $250,000) of the warranty provision has been
reversed.
Commentary:
Comparative of movements in provision
IAS 37.84
IAS 37 does not require comparatives of movements in provision to be presented.
Contingent liability
In this illustration, no contingent liabilities are recognised in the business combination.
IFRS 3.B67.c
For contingent liabilities recognised in a business combination, the acquirer is required to
disclose the information required by paragraphs 84 and 85 of IAS 37 Provisions,
Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets for each class of provision.
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Cost:
At 1 January 2,694 1,644
Received during the financial year 2,040 1,030
Exchange differences 34 20
At 31 December 4,768 2,694
Accumulated amortisation:
At 1 January 730 540
Amortisation 239 180
Exchange differences 11 10
At 31 December 980 730
31 December 1 January
2018 2017 2017
Net carrying amount: $’000 $’000 $’000
Current 300 210 150
Non-current 3,488 1,754 954
3,788 1,964 1,104
Deferred capital grants relate to government grants received for the acquisition of IAS 20.39.b
equipment for research activities undertaken by the Group’s subsidiary in People’s
Republic of China to promote technology advancement and transfer. There are no IAS 20.39.c
unfulfilled conditions or contingencies attached to these grants.
Current:
Obligations under
finance leases (Note
37(d)) 2019 216 16 14 – – –
Non-current:
Obligations under
finance leases (Note
37(d)) 2020-2025 720 160 190 – – –
7.5% p.a. fixed rate
SGD bonds 2020-2024 3,100 3,000 3,400 3,100 3,000 3,400
Bank loans:
- 6% p.a. fixed rate
SGD bank loan 2019 - 1,000 2,100 - - -
- 8% p.a. fixed rate
USD loan 31 July 2024 1,545 - - – – –
- SGD loan at LIBOR +
2.0% p.a. 2020-2024 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200
Commentary:
Defaults or breaches
IFRS 7.18
If during the period, there were defaults or breaches of loan agreement terms, the entity
should disclose:
(a) Details of any defaults during the period of principal, interest, sinking fund, or
redemption terms of those loans payable;
(b) The carrying amount of the loans payable in default at the reporting date; and
(c) Whether the default was remedied, or the terms of the loans payable were
renegotiated, before the financial statements were authorised for issue.
These disclosure requirements are also applicable to breaches of loan agreement terms IFRS 7.19
other than those mentioned above when breaches permit the lender to demand accelerated
repayment (unless the breaches were remedied, or the terms of the loan were
renegotiated, on or before the reporting date).
If an entity has issued an instrument that contains both a liability and an equity component IFRS 7.17
and the instrument has multiple embedded derivatives whose values are interdependent
(such as a callable convertible debt instrument), it shall disclose the existence of those
features.
Defaults or breaches
*The ‘other’ column relates to reclassification of non-current portion of loans and bonds
including obligations under finance leases due to passage of time.
Commentary:
Group Company
31 December 1 January 31 December 1 January
2018 2017 2017 2018 2017 2017
$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
Group Company
31 December 1 January 31 December 1 January
2018 2017 2017 2018 2017 2017
$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
Commentary:
IAS 24.23
Please refer to commentary no. 1 of Note 22 Investment securities.
Group Company
31 December 1 January 31 December 1 January
2018 2017 2017 2018 2017 2017
$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
As of 31 December 2018 and prior to payment, the fair value of the contingent IFRS 3.58
consideration was reassessed which led to additional cost charged to profit or loss. The initial
fair value of the consideration of $450,000 is included in cash flows from investing
activities, the remainder, totalling to $250,000, is recognised in cash flows from operating
activities.
Group
Extract of Consolidated Cash Flow Statement
2018
$’000
Cash flows from operating activities:
Settlement of contingent consideration for business combination ( 250)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Settlement of contingent consideration for business combination (450)
IAS 7.16
2018 2017
No. of No. of
shares shares
‘000 $’000 ‘000 $’000
Issued and fully paid ordinary shares IAS 1.79.a.ii
IAS 1.79.a.v
The holders of ordinary shares (except treasury shares) are entitled to receive
dividends as and when declared by the Company. All ordinary shares carry one vote per IAS 1.79.a.iii
share without restrictions. The ordinary shares have no par value.
The Company has two employee share option plans under which options to subscribe IAS 1.79.a.vii
for the Company’s ordinary shares have been granted to employees of the Group.
b) Treasury shares
Group and Company
No. of No. of
shares shares
‘000 $’000 ‘000 $’000
At 1 January – – – –
Acquired during the financial year (200) (254) – –
Reissued pursuant to employee share option
plans:
- For cash on exercise of employee share
options (Note 35) 75 81 – –
- Transferred from employee share option
reserve – 79 – –
- Gain transferred to gain or loss on reissuance
of treasury shares – (65) – –
75 95 – –
At 31 December (125) (159) – –
Treasury shares relate to ordinary shares of the Company that is held by the Company.
The Company acquired 200,000 (2017: nil) shares in the Company through purchases IAS 32.33
on the Singapore Exchange during the financial year. The total amount paid to acquire
the shares was $254,000 (2017: nil) and this was presented as a component within
shareholders’ equity.
The Company reissued 75,000 (2017: nil) treasury shares pursuant to its employee
share option plans at a weighted average exercise price of $1.08 (2017: nil) each.
IAS 32.33
2018 XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited | 170
XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited and its subsidiaries
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Share-based payments (Employee share option plans) 245 150 IFRS 2.51.a
2018 2017
No. WAEP ($) No. WAEP ($)
The fair value of the share options granted under the SEOP is estimated at the grant date IFRS 2.47.a.i
using a binomial option pricing model, taking into account the terms and conditions upon
which the share options were granted.
The fair value of share options granted under the GESP is estimated at the date of the IFRS 2.47.a.i and iii
grant using a Monte Carlo simulation model, taking into account the terms and conditions
upon which the options were granted. The model simulates the TSR and compares it
against the group of principal competitors. It takes into account historic dividends, share
price fluctuation covariance of the Company and each entity of the group of competitors
to predict the distribution of relative share performance.
The following table lists the inputs to the option pricing models for the years ended 31 IFRS 2.47.a.i
December 2018, 31 December 2017 and 1 January 2017:
IFRS 2.47.a.ii
The expected life of the share options is based on historical data and is not necessarily
indicative of exercise patterns that may occur. The expected volatility reflects the
assumption that the historical volatility over a period similar to the life of the options is
indicative of future trends, which may not necessarily be the actual outcome.
Commentary:
In this illustration, all the share-based payment transactions are equity-settled. If an entity IFRS 2.51.a and b
has share-based payment transactions that are either cash-settled or with cash alternatives
(for example, share appreciation rights), the entity should disclose:
- The total expense recognised for the period arising from the share-based payment
transactions;
- The total carrying amount of liabilities at the end of the period; and
- The total intrinsic value at the end of the period of liabilities for which the
counterparty’s right to cash or other assets had vested by the end of the period (e.g.,
vested share appreciation rights).
If options were exercised on a regular basis throughout the period, an entity may instead IFRS 2.45.c
disclose the weighted average share price during the period.
If the range of exercise prices is wide, the outstanding options shall be divided into ranges IFRS 2.45.d
that are meaningful for assessing the number and timing of additional shares that may be
issued and the cash that may be received upon exercise of those options.
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Related companies:
These are subsidiaries and associates of Good Group (International) Ltd and its
subsidiaries, excluding entities within the Group.
Company / firm related to a director: IAS 24.18
- One of the directors of the Company, through his 25% (2017: 25%) equity interest in
Unik-One Pte Ltd (UOPL), had an interest in a contract for the supply of specialised
digital components to UOPL. During the financial year, the Group sold specialised
digital components of $225,000 (2017: $135,000) to UOPL. No balance with UOPL
was outstanding at the end of the reporting period (31 December 2017: nil, 1
January 2017: nil).
- The Group has entered into a contract with LPS Associates LLP, a firm of which the
wife of one of the directors of the Company is the managing partner, for the
provision of consolidation accounting services to the Company for an amount of
$25,000 (2017: $18,000). No balance with the firm was outstanding at the end of
the reporting period (31 December 2017: nil, 1 January 2017: nil).
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
- 37,000 (2017: 25,000) share options were granted to two of the Company's
executive directors under the SEOP (Note 35) at an exercise price of $1.30 (2017:
$1.26) each.
- These directors exercised options for 10,000 (2017: 5,000) ordinary shares of the
Company at a price of $1.05 (2017: $1.05) each, with a total cash consideration of
$10,500 (2017: $5,250) paid to the Company.
At the end of the reporting period, the total number of outstanding share options
granted by the Company to the abovementioned directors under the SEOP amount to
130,000 (2017: 93,000). No share options have been granted to the Company's non-
executive directors.
Commentary:
An entity should make disclosures for transactions with related parties separately for each IAS 24.19 and 20
of the following categories: (a) the parent; (b) entities with joint control or significant
influence over the entity; (c) subsidiaries; (d) associates; (e) joint ventures in which the
entity is a venturer; (f) key management personnel of the entity or its parent; and (g) other
related parties. Such categorisation help provide a more comprehensive analysis of related
party balances and transactions.
Commentary (continued):
Related party transactions
The following are examples of transactions that are disclosed if they are with a related party: IAS 24.21
(a) The Group uses the legal services provided by Mrs. May Lim who is a close family member
IAS 24.18.b
of Mr. Goh Hock Inn, a Director of the Company. The legal fees paid were in relation to
purchase of certain non-current assets of the Group. The fees charged were based on
normal market rates for such services and were due and payable under normal payment
terms.
(b) The Group purchases its office stationeries from Draco Pte. Ltd., a Company controlled by
Mr. Goh Hock Inn, a Director of the Company. These purchases are based on normal
market rates for such supplies and were due and payable under normal payment terms.
37. Commitments
a) Capital commitments
Capital expenditure contracted for as at the end of the reporting period but not
recognised in the financial statements are as follows:
Group Company
31 31
December 1 January December 1 January
2018 2017 2017 2018 2017 2017
$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
Group
31 December 1 January
2018 2017 2017
$’000 $’000 $’000
Group
31 December 1 January
2018 2017 2017
$’000 $’000 $’000
Commentary:
An entity shall disclose total commitments it has made but not recognised at the reporting date IFRS 12.B18
(including its share of commitments made jointly with other investors with joint control of a
joint venture) relating to its interests in joint ventures. Commitments are those that may give
rise to a future outflow of cash or other resources.
Unrecognised commitments that may give rise to a future outflow of cash or other resources IFRS 12.B19
include:
(a) unrecognised commitments to contribute funding or resources as a result of, for example:
i. the constitution or acquisition agreements of a joint venture (that, for example,
require an entity to contribute funds over a specific period).
ii. capital-intensive projects undertaken by a joint venture.
iii. unconditional purchase obligations, comprising procurement of equipment, inventory
or services that an entity is committed to purchasing from, or on behalf of, a joint
venture.
iv. unrecognised commitments to provide loans or other financial support to a joint
venture.
v. unrecognised commitments to contribute resources to a joint venture, such as assets
or services.
vi. other non-cancellable unrecognised commitments relating to a joint venture.
(b) Unrecognised commitments to acquire another party’s ownership interest (or a portion of
that ownership interest) in a joint venture if a particular event occurs or does not occur in
the future.
The disclosure of future minimum lease payments according to time bands relates only to non- IAS 17.4
cancellable operating leases. A non-cancellable lease is a lease that is cancellable only:
(a) upon the occurrence of some remote contingency;
(b) with the permission of the lessor;
(c) if the lessee enters into a new lease for the same or an equivalent asset with the same
lessor; or
(d) upon payment by the lessee of such an additional amount that, at inception of the lease,
continuation of the lease is reasonably certain.
A leasing arrangement where the lessee has the right to terminate lease by providing a written
notice to the lessor without incurring losses significant in comparison to the value of remaining
lease payments is generally not considered a non-cancellable lease and is not included in such
disclosure.
and fixtures. These leases have terms of renewal but no purchase options and
escalation clauses. Renewals are at the option of the specific entity that holds the
lease.
Future minimum lease payments under finance leases together with the present value IAS 17.31.b
of the net minimum lease payments are as follows:
Group
38. Contingencies
Legal claim
On 30 November 2018, a customer has commenced an action against the Group in IAS 11.45
respect of construction works claimed to be sub-standard. The estimated payout is
$250,000 should the action be successful. A trial date has not yet been set and
therefore it is not practicable to state the timing of any payment. The Group has been
advised by its legal counsel that it is possible, but not probable, that the action will
succeed and accordingly no provision for any liability has been made in these financial
statements.
Guarantees
The Group has provided the following guarantees at the end of the reporting period: IAS 24.20.h
- It has guaranteed its share of $20,000 (31 December 2017: $15,000; 1 January IFRS 12.23.b
2017: $13,000) of the associate’s contingent liabilities which have been incurred
jointly with other investors.
IFRS 12.23.b
- It has guaranteed part of the bank overdraft of the associate to a maximum
amount of $300,000 (31 December 2017: nil, 1 January 2017: nil), which it is
severally liable for in the event of default by the associate.
- It has guaranteed its interest in its share of the joint venture’s loan of $245,000 IFRS 12.23.b
(31 December 2017: $240,000, 1 January 2017: $190,000) (Note 30).
- It has guaranteed to an unrelated party the performance of a contract for the joint IFRS 12.23.b
venture. No liability is expected to arise (31 December 2017: nil, 1 January 2017:
nil).
The Company has provided a corporate guarantee to a bank for a $5,400,000 (31 IAS 24.20.h
December 2017: $5,400,000, 1 January 2017: $5,400,000) loan (Note 30) taken by
a subsidiary.
b) Contingent asset
a) A legal claim for defamation of $500,000 was lodged against one of the Group’s IAS 37.89
competitors in October 2017. Based on advice from the legal counsel, the Group is
confident that the dispute will be settled in its favour.
b) The Group is claiming amounts (such as variations and additional works under the IAS 11.45
construction contracts) and pending proceedings and disputes with clients. It is not
possible to reasonably determine the extent and timing of possible inflow of
economic benefits. These claims are therefore not recognised in these financial
statements.
Fair value measurements that use inputs of different hierarchy levels are categorised in IFRS 13.73
its entirety in the same level of the fair value hierarchy as the lowest level input that is
significant to the entire measurement.
Commentary:
An entity shall disclose information that helps users of its financial statements assess both of IFRS 13.91
the following:
(a) For assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring
basis in the balance sheet after initial recognition, the valuation techniques and inputs
used to develop those measurements.
(b) For recurring fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), the
effect of the measurements on profit or loss or other comprehensive income for the
period.
IFRS 13.92
To meet the objective above, an entity shall consider all the following:
(a) The level of detail necessary to satisfy the disclosure requirements;
(b) How much emphasis to place on each of the various requirements;
(c) How much aggregation and disaggregation to undertake; and
(d) Whether users of financial statements need additional information to evaluate the
quantitative information disclosed.
If the disclosures provided in accordance with IFRS 13 and other IFRSs are insufficient to meet
the objectives above, an entity shall disclose additional information necessary to meet those
objectives.
Group
2018
$’000
Non-financial assets:
Investment properties
Commercial - - 2,831 2,831
Residential - 1,814 - 1,814
Property, plant and equipment
Freehold land - - 11,874 11,874
Buildings - - 3,291 3,291
Disposal group classified as held for sale* - - 199 199
Non-financial assets as at 31 December 2018 - 1,814 18,195 20,009
*Disposal group classified as held for sale with a carrying amount of $649,000 were written
down to their fair value of $219,000, less costs to sell of $20,000 (or $199,000), resulting
in a net loss of $450,000, which was included in the profit or loss for the period.
Group
IFRS 13.93.a and
31 December 2017
b
$’000
Non-financial assets:
Investment properties
Commercial - - 2,380 2,380
Residential - 1,575 - 1,575
Property, plant and equipment
Freehold land - - 10,726 10,726
Buildings - - 3,574 3,574
Non-financial assets as at 31 December 2017 - 1,575 16,680 18,255
IFRS 13.93.d
Group
IFRS 13.93.a and
1 January 2017
b
$’000
Non-financial assets:
Investment properties
Commercial - - 2,280 2,280
Residential - 1,545 - 1,545
Property, plant and equipment
Freehold land - - 7,468 7,468
Buildings - - 1,075 1,075
Non-financial assets as at 1 January 2017 - 1,545 10,823 12,368
value measurement for assets and liabilities that are categorised within Level 2 of the
fair value hierarchy:
Derivatives
Forward currency contracts and interest rate swap contracts are valued using a
valuation technique with market observable inputs. The most frequently applied
valuation techniques include forward pricing and swap models, using present value
calculations. The models incorporate various inputs including the credit quality of
counterparties, foreign exchange spot and forward rates, interest rate curves and
forward rate curves.
Residential investment properties
The valuation of residential investment properties are based on comparable market
transactions that consider sales of similar properties that have been transacted in the
open market.
IFRS 13.93.d
The following table shows the information about fair value measurements using
significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
*The yield adjustments are made for any difference in the nature, location or condition of
the specific property.
*The yield adjustments are made for any difference in the nature, location or condition of
the specific property.
*The yield adjustments are made for any difference in the nature, location or condition of
the specific property.
For unquoted equity securities, a significant increase (decrease) in the expected
dividend yield would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. A
significant increase (decrease) in discount for lack of marketability would result in a
significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. A change in assumption used for
dividend yield may warrant a directionally opposite change in assumption for discount
for lack of marketability.
For unquoted debt securities, significant increases (decreases) in prepayment rates,
probability of default and loss severity in the event of default would result in a
significant lower (higher) fair value measurement. Generally, a change in the
assumption used for the probability of default is accompanied by a directionally
similar change in the assumption used for the loss severity and a directionally
opposite change in the assumption used for prepayment rates.
For contingent consideration, a significant increase (decrease) in the probability of
meeting the contractual earnings target would result in a significantly higher (lower)
fair value measurement.
For freehold land and buildings and commercial investment properties, a significant
increase (decrease) in yield adjustments based on management’s assumptions would
result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.
31 December 2017
Effect of reasonably possible
alternative assumptions
Carrying Profit or loss Other
amount comprehensive
income
$’000 $’000 $’000
Recurring fair value measurements
Available-for-sale financial assets:
Unquoted equity securities 28 - 10
Unquoted debt securities 980 - 18
Opening balance
1 January 2018 628 980 2,380 - 3,988
Total gains or losses for
the period
Included in profit or loss - (65) 350 (235) 50
Included in other
comprehensive income 180 80 - - 260
Purchases, issues, sales
and settlements
Purchases 140 598 400 - 1,138
Sales (109) (30) - - (139)
Transfer from/(to)
investment properties - - (300) - (300)
IFRS 13.93.e.i
Exchange differences - - 1 - 1
Arising from acquisition of
subsidiary - - - (450) (450)
IFRS 13.93.e.ii
Closing balance 839 1,563 2,831 (685) 4,548
Group
2018
$’000
Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
Financial assets at FVOCI Property, plant and Investment Contingent Total
equipment properties consideration
Unquoted Unquoted Freehold Buildings Commercial
equity debt land
securities securities
(i) Relates to net gain from fair value adjustment of investment properties held as at 31 December
2018.
(ii) Relates to unrealised loss from fair value adjustment of contingent consideration for business
combination as at 31 December 2018.
Group
2017
$’000
Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
Available-for-sale Property, plant and Investment Total
financial assets equipment properties
Unquoted Unquoted Freehold Buildings Commercial
equity debt land
securities securities
Total gains and IFRS 13.93.e.i
losses for the period
included in
Profit or loss:
- Other income
Net gain from
fair value
adjustment of
investment
properties (i) - - - - 100 100
(i) Relates to net gain from fair value adjustment of investment properties held as at 31 December
2017.
The Group’s Chief Financial Officer (CFO), who is assisted by the Head of Treasury
and senior controller (collectively referred to as the “CFO office”) oversees the
Group’s financial reporting valuation process and is responsible for setting and
documenting the Group’s valuation policies and procedures. In this regard, the CFO
office reports to the Group’s Audit Committee.
For all significant financial reporting valuations using valuation models and significant
unobservable inputs, it is the Group’s policy to engage external valuation experts who
possess the relevant credentials and knowledge on the subject of valuation, valuation
methodologies and SFRS(I) 13 fair value measurement guidance to perform the
valuation.
For valuations performed by external valuation experts, the appropriateness of the
valuation methodologies and assumptions adopted are reviewed along with the
appropriateness and reliability of the inputs (including those developed internally by
the Group) used in the valuations.
In selecting the appropriate valuation models and inputs to be adopted for each
valuation that uses significant non-observable inputs, external valuation experts are
requested to calibrate the valuation models and inputs to actual market transactions
(which may include transactions entered into by the Group with third parties as
appropriate) that are relevant to the valuation if such information are reasonably
available. For valuations that are sensitive to the unobservable inputs used, external
valuation experts are required, to the extent practicable to use a minimum of two
valuation approaches to allow for cross-checks.
Significant changes in fair value measurements from period to period are evaluated
for reasonableness. Key drivers of the changes are identified and assessed for
reasonableness against relevant information from independent sources, or internal
sources if necessary and appropriate.
The CFO office documents and reports its analysis and results of the external
valuations to the Audit Committee on a quarterly basis. The Audit Committee
performs a high-level independent review of the valuation process and results and
recommends if any revisions need to be made before presenting the results to the
Board of Directors for approval.
e) Assets and liabilities not measured at fair value, for which fair value is disclosed
IFRS 13.97
IFRS 7.25
IFRS 7.26
The following table shows an analysis of the Group’s assets and liabilities not measured
at fair value, for which fair value is disclosed:
Group
31 December 2018
$’000
Fair value measurements at the end of the reporting period using
Quoted
prices in
active Significant
markets observable
for inputs other Significant
identical than quoted unobservable Fair value Carrying
assets prices inputs Total amount
(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Assets
Government bonds 675 - - 675 660
Investment in associates 10,600 - - 10,600 10,595
Staff loans (non-current) - - 60 60 63
Liabilities:
Deferred cash settlement - - (205) (205) (200)
Financial guarantees - - (29) (29) (26)
Loans and borrowings (non-
current)
- Obligations under finance
leases - - (769) (769) (720)
- Fixed rate bank loans and
bonds - - (5,183) (5,183) (5,120)
- Convertible redeemable
preference shares - - (509) (509) (450)
Company
Assets
Amounts and loans due from
subsidiaries - 13,432 - 13,432 13,972
Amount due from associates - 1,168 - 1,168 1,230
Amounts due from a fellow
subsidiary - 1,457 - 1,457 1,500
Staff loans (non-current) - - 49 49 51
Liabilities:
Financial guarantees - - (85) (85) (80)
Loans and borrowings (non-
current)
- Fixed rate bank loans and
bonds - - (3,162) (3,162) (3,100)
- Convertible redeemable
preference shares - - (509) (509) (450)
e) Assets and liabilities not measured at fair value, for which fair value is disclosed
IFRS 13.97
(continued) IFRS 7.25
Group IFRS 7.26
31 December 2017
$’000
Fair value measurements at the end of the reporting period using
Quoted
prices in
active Significant
markets observable
for inputs other Significant
identical than quoted unobservable Fair value Carrying
assets prices inputs Total amount
(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Assets
Government bonds 675 - - 675 660
Equity securities, at cost - - - -* 600
Investment in associates 10,400 - - 10,400 10,291
Staff loans (non-current) - - 45 45 48
Liabilities:
Financial guarantees - - (11) (11) (8)
Loans and borrowings (non-
current)
- Obligations under finance
lease - - (169) (169) (160)
- Fixed rate bank loans and
bonds - - (5,862) (5,862) (5,830)
- Convertible redeemable
preference shares - - (459) (459) (428)
Company
Assets
Amounts and loans due from
subsidiaries - 14,161 - 14,161 14,598
Amount due from associates - 1,156 - 1,156 1,252
Amounts due from a fellow
subsidiary - 1,443 - 1,443 1,515
Staff loans (non-current) - - 34 34 36
Liabilities:
Financial guarantees - - (85) (85) (70)
Loans and borrowings (non-
current)
- Fixed rate bank loans and
bonds - - (3,060) (3,060) (3,000)
- Convertible redeemable
preference shares - - (459) (459) (428)
e) Assets and liabilities not measured at fair value, for which fair value is disclosed
IFRS 13.97
(continued) IFRS 7.25
Group IFRS 7.26
1 January 2017
$’000
Fair value measurements at the end of the reporting period using
Quoted
prices in
active Significant
markets observable
for inputs other Significant
identical than quoted unobservable Fair value Carrying
assets prices inputs Total amount
(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Assets
Government bonds 665 - - 665 650
Equity securities, at cost - - - -* 600
Investment in associates 10,300 - - 10,300 10,099
Staff loans (non-current) - - 37 37 32
Liabilities:
Financial guarantees - - (18) (18) (20)
Loans and borrowings (non-
current)
- Obligations under finance
lease - - (201) (201) (190)
- Fixed rate bank loans and
bonds - - (7,682) (7,682) (7,400)
Company
Assets
Amounts and loans due from
subsidiaries - 13,702 - 13,702 13,910
Amount due from associates - 1,166 - 1,166 1,252
Amounts due from a fellow
subsidiary - 1,433 - 1,433 1,515
Staff loans (non-current) - - 24 24 28
Liabilities:
Financial guarantees - - (85) (85) (80)
Loans and borrowings (non-
current)
- Fixed rate bank loans and
bonds - - (3,460) (3,460) (3,400)
Commentary:
In this illustration, the current use of the non-financial assets does not differ from their highest IFRS 13.93.i
and best use. If for recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements, the highest and best
use of a non-financial asset differs from its current use, an entity shall disclose the fact and
why the non-financial asset is being used in a manner that differs from its highest and best use.
In this illustration, the Group’s commercial properties are categorised within Level 3 of the fair
value hierarchy as the properties’ fair values are determined based on comparable market IFRS 13.98
transactions adjusted for significant unobservable inputs such as yield adjustments relating to
nature, location and condition of the specific property.
In this illustration, the Group’s residential investment properties are categorised within Level 2
of the fair value hierarchy as the properties’ fair values are determined solely based on
observable inputs other than quoted prices.
In this illustration, the Group does not have any liability measured at fair value and issued with
an inseparable third-party credit enhancement.
For a liability measured at fair value and issued with an inseparable third-party credit
enhancement, an issuer shall disclose the existence of that credit enhancement and whether it
is reflected in the fair value measurement of the liability.
Commentary (continued):
In this illustration, there has been no change in valuation technique for recurring and non- IFRS 13.93.d
recurring fair value measurements categorised within Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair value
hierarchy. If there has been a change in valuation technique (e.g. changing from a market
approach to an income approach or use of an additional valuation technique), the entity shall
disclose that change and the reason(s) for making it.
For recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements categorised within Level 3 of the fair
IFRS 13.93.g
value hierarchy, a description of valuation processes used by the entity (including, for
example, how an entity decides its valuation policies and procedures and analyses changes in
fair value measurements from period to period.
An entity might disclose the following:
(a) for the group within the entity that decides the entity’s valuation policies and IFRS 13.IE65
procedures:
i. its description;
ii. to whom that group reports; and
iii. the internal reporting procedures in place (e.g. whether and, if so, how pricing, risk
management or audit committees discuss and assess the fair value measurements.
(b) the frequency and methods for calibration, back testing and other testing procedures of
pricing models;
(c) the process for analysing changes in fair value measurements from period to period;
(d) how the entity determined that third-party information, such as broker quotes or pricing
services, used in the fair value measurement was developed in accordance with IFRS 13;
and
(e) the methods used to develop and substantiate the unobservable inputs used in a fair
value measurement.
It is important to note that the illustration on valuation policies and procedures for
recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements categorised within Level 3 of the
fair value hierarchy is based on certain assumed facts regarding circumstances
surrounding XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited. The valuation policies and procedures
of other entities may be different and disclosures would have to be customised in the
light of specific facts and circumstances applicable to the entity.
In this illustration, investment properties are carried at fair value. For any investment
properties recorded at cost, IAS 40 requires disclosure about fair value. Please refer to
commentary no.2 of Note 2.8 Investment properties.
Where investment properties are carried at cost for which fair value are disclosed, IFRS 13.97 IFRS 13.97
requires the disclosures of
- the level of the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurements are IFRS 13.93.b
categorised in their entirety (Level 1, 2 or 3),
- a description of the valuation technique(s) and inputs used in the fair value measurement. IFRS 13.93.d
If there has been a change in valuation technique, the entity shall disclose the reason for
making it,
- the fact and why the non-financial asset is being used in a manner that differs from its IFRS 13.93.i
highest and best use if the highest and best use of a non-financial asset differs from its
current use
Commentary (continued):
IFRS 7.25 requires the fair value of each class of financial assets and liabilities to be disclosed IFRS 7.25 and 29
in a way that permits it to be compared with its carrying amount. However, disclosures of fair
value are not required:
- When the carrying amount is a reasonable approximation of fair value (e.g., short-term
trade and other receivables and payables, and long-term loans that are re-priced to market
rate); or
- Lease liabilities
In this illustration, in addition to the above exemptions, the comparison between carrying
amount and fair value of financial assets or liabilities that are carried at fair value (e.g., held for
trading investments and derivatives) has not been disclosed as these assets are carried at fair
value.
Group
2017
$’000
Financial assets held-for-trading
- Quoted equity securities XXX
Financial investments available-for-sale
- Other debt securities XXX
The above financial assets were transferred from Level 1 to Level 2 as they were
delisted from the stock exchange and therefore ceased to be actively traded during the
year and fair values were consequently measured using valuation techniques and using
observable market inputs.
40. Financial risk management objectives and policies IFRS 7.7 and 31
The Group and the Company are exposed to financial risks arising from its operations and
IFRS 7.31-33 and
the use of financial instruments. The key financial risks include credit risk, liquidity risk, IG15
interest rate risk, foreign currency risk and market price risk. The board of directors
reviews and agrees on policies and procedures for the management of these risks, which
are executed by the Chief Financial Officer, Head of Treasury and Head of Credit Control.
The Audit Committee provides independent oversight to the effectiveness of the risk
management process. It is, and has been, throughout the current and previous financial
year, the Group’s policy that no trading in derivatives for speculative purposes shall be
undertaken.
The following sections provide details regarding the Group’s and Company’s exposure to
the above-mentioned financial risks and the objectives, policies and processes for the
management of these risks.
Commentary:
IFRS 7 requires an entity to disclose qualitative and quantitative information that enables IFRS 7.31-33
users of its financial statements to evaluate the nature and extent of risks arising from
financial instruments to which the entity is exposed at the reporting date, including the
entity’s policies and processes for accepting, measuring, monitoring and controlling such
risks. In addition, an entity is required to disclose any change in the qualitative information
from the previous period and explain the reasons for the change.
The disclosures in response to IFRS 7 illustrated in this note are based on assumed
circumstances of XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited and may not be applicable or
relevant to other entities. Each entity should customise the information disclosed
according to the specific circumstances, financial risk exposures, and risk
management policies and procedures relevant to the entity.
Decentralised disclosures
In this illustration, most of the information regarding the nature and extent of risks arising
from financial instruments required by IFRS 7.31-42, has been disclosed in one centralised
note. Alternatively, an entity may disclose such information in the respective balance sheet
item notes where appropriate.
In this illustration, there’s no change to the Group’s exposure to risk arising from financial
IFRS 7.33.c
instruments. IFRS 7 requires disclosures of changes from previous period for
(a) exposures to risk and how they arise; (or)
(b) its objective, policies and processes for managing the risk and the methods used to
measure the risks from the previous period.
counterparty fails to make contractual payments, within 60 days when they fall due,
which are derived based on the Group’s historical information.
The Group considers “low risk” to be an investment grade credit rating with at least IFRS 7.35F.a.i
IFRS 7.35F.a.ii
one major rating agency for those investments with credit rating. To assess whether
there is a significant increase in credit risk, the company compares the risk of a default
occurring on the asset as at reporting date with the risk of default as at the date of
initial recognition. The Group considers available reasonable and supportive
forwarding-looking information which includes the following indicators:
The gross carrying amount of debt securities at amortised cost, debt securities at IFRS 7.35K.a
fair value through other comprehensive income and loans, without taking into
account of any collaterals held or other credit enhancements which represents the
maximum exposure to loss, is as follows:
Group 31 December
2018
$’000
12-month ECL Debt securities at amortised cost 675
12-month ECL Loans at amortised cost 2,792
Lifetime ECL Debt securities at FVOCI 1,678
Total 4,953
The gross carrying amount of trade receivables and contract assets of the Group
are disclosed in Note 21.
The gross carrying amount of loans of the Company as at 31 December 2018,
without taking into account of any collaterals held or other credit enhancements
which represents the maximum exposure to loss, is $17,269,000.
Group Company
$’000 $’000
8 70
As at 1 January 2018
Loss allowance measured at:
- 12- month ECL 2 10
New financial guarantee originated 16 -
As at 31 December 2018 26 80
Group
Commentary:
The credit risk disclosures shall enable users of financial statements to understand the
effect of credit risk on the amount, timing and uncertainty of future cash flows. To achieve
this objective, credit risk disclosures shall provide:
(a) Information about an entity’s credit risk management practices and how they relate to
the recognition and measurement of expected credit losses, including the methods,
assumptions and information used to measure expected credit losses
(b) The quantitative and qualitative information that allows users of financial statements
to evaluate the amounts in the financial statements arising from expected credit
losses, including changes in the amount of expected credit losses and the reasons for
those changes; and
(c) Information about an entity’s credit risk exposure (i.e. the credit risk inherent in an
entity’s financial assets and commitments to extend credit) including significant credit
risk concentrations.
An entity need not duplicate information that is already presented elsewhere, provided that
the information is incorporated by cross-reference from the financial statements to other
statements, such as a management commentary or risk report that is available to users of
the financial statements on the same terms as the financial statements and at the same
time. Without the information incorporated by cross-reference, the financial statements are
incomplete.
For disclosures requirement above, an entity shall consider how much detail to disclose, how
much emphasis to place on different aspects of the disclosure requirements, the appropriate
level of aggregation or disaggregation, and whether users of the financial statements need
additional explanations to evaluate the quantitative information disclosed.
In this illustration, the Group does not have modification of contractual cash flows for its
financial assets. If an entity has modification of contractual cash flows for its financial
assets, an entity shall disclose how it has applied the requirements in para 5.5.12 of IFRS 9,
including how an entity:
(i) Determines whether the credit risk on a financial asset that has been modified while the
loss allowance was measured at an amount equal to lifetime expected credit losses, has
improved to the extent that the loss allowance reverts to being measured at an amount
equal to 12-month expected credit losses in accordance with para 5.5.5 of IFRS 9; and
(ii) Monitors the extent to which the loss allowance on financial assets meeting the criteria
in (i) is subsequently remeasured at an amount equal to lifetime expected credit losses
in accordance with para 5.5.3 of IFRS 9.
In addition, to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature and effect of
modifications of contractual cash flows on financial assets that have not resulted in
derecognition and the effect of such modifications on the measurement of expected credit
losses; an entity shall disclose
(a) The amortised cost before the modification and the net modification gain or loss
recognised for financial assets for which the contractual cash flows have been modified
during the reporting period while they had a loss allowance measured at an amount
equal to lifetime expected credit losses; and
(b) The gross carrying amount at the end of the reporting period of financial assets that
have been modified since initial recognition at a time when the loss allowance was
measured at an amount equal to lifetime expected credit losses and for which the loss
allowance has changed during the reporting period to an amount equal to 12-month
expected credit losses
The entity shall also provide an explanation of how significant changes in the gross carrying
amount of financial instruments during the period contributed to changes in the loss
allowance for modification of contractual cash flows on financial assets that do not result in
a derecognition of those financial assets in accordance with IFRS 9.
Commentary:
In this illustration, the Group does not have financial assets that are credit-impaired at the
reporting date (but that are not purchased or originated credit impaired and financial
assets that are purchased on originated credit-impaired.
If an entity has such financial assets, the entity shall disclose:
(a) The changes in the loss allowance and the reasons for those changes, provide by class IFRS 7.35H
of financial instrument, a reconciliation from the opening balance to the closing
balance of the loss allowance, in a table, showing separately the changes during the
period;
(b) the total amount of undiscounted expected credit losses at initial recognition on IFRS 7.35H.c
financial assets initially recognised during the reporting period; and
(c) The gross carrying amount by credit risk rating grades. IFRS 7.35M.c
In this illustration, the Group does not have any collateral and other credit enhancement
which affects the amounts arising from expected credit losses.
If an entity has any collateral and other credit enhancement which affects the amounts
arising from expected credit losses, the entity shall disclose by class of financial
instrument:
(a) A narrative description of collateral held as security and other credit enhancements, IFRS 7.35K.b
including:
(i) A description of the nature and quality of the collateral held
(ii) An explanation of any significant changes in the quality of that collateral or credit
enhancements as a result of deterioration or changes in the collateral policies of
the entity during the reporting period; and
(iii) Information about financial instruments for which an entity has not recognised a
loss allowance because of the collateral
(b) Quantitative information about the collateral held as security and other credit IFRS 7.35K.c
enhancements (for example, quantification of extent to which collateral and other
credit enhancements mitigate credit risk) for financial assets that are credit-impaired
at the reporting date.
An entity shall disclose the contractual amount outstanding on financial assets that were IFRS 7.35L
written off during the reporting period and are still subject to enforcement activity.
In this illustration, the Group has applied the presumption in paragraph 5.5.11 of IFRS 9
that there have been significant increases in credit risk since initial recognition when a
financial asset are more than 30 days past due.
If an entity has rebutted the presumption, the entity has to disclose how an entity IFRS 7.35F.a.ii
determine whether credit risk of financial instruments has increased significantly since
initial recognition.
Commentary:
Credit risk relating to financial assets or financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss IFRS 7.9-11
Quantitative disclosures
IFRS 7 requires the disclosure of summary quantitative data about an entity’s exposure to IFRS 7.34.a
financial risk (e.g., credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk) that is based on the information
provided internally to key management personnel of the entity (as defined in IAS 24,
Related Party Disclosures), e.g., the board of directors or CEO. As such, the disclosures
would be defined by the actual information used by management in managing financial
risks, which may be different from those disclosed in this illustration.
IFRS 7.35 and IG20
In addition, if the above-mentioned quantitative data disclosed as at the end of the
reporting period are unrepresentative of the entity’s exposure to risk during the period, the
entity shall provide further information that is representative e.g., an entity might disclosed
the highest, lowest and average amount of risk to which it was exposed during the period to
meet the disclosure requirement.
The identification of concentrations of credit risk requires judgement taking into account IFRS 7.AGB8 and
IG18
the circumstances of the entity. Apart from country and industry sectors, other measures
of credit risk concentrations may include credit rating or other measures of credit quality,
limited number of individual counterparties, or groups of closely related counterparties.
b) Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group or the Company will encounter difficulty in IFRS 7.33.a-b, 39.c
and IG5
meeting financial obligations due to shortage of funds. The Group’s and the Company’s
exposure to liquidity risk arises primarily from mismatches of the maturities of financial
assets and liabilities. The Group’s and the Company’s objective is to maintain a balance
between continuity of funding and flexibility through the use of stand-by credit
facilities.
The Group’s and the Company’s liquidity risk management policy is that not more than IFRS 7.33.b, 39.c
20% (31 December 2017: 20%, 1 January 2017: 20%) of loans and borrowings and AGB11F.e
(including overdrafts and convertible redeemable preference shares) should mature in IFRS 7.AGB11F.a
the next one year period, and that to maintain sufficient liquid financial assets and and c
stand-by credit facilities with three different banks. At the end of the reporting period,
approximately 8% (31 December 2017: 15%, 1 January 2017: 14%) of the Group’s
loans and borrowings will mature in less than one year based on the carrying amount
reflected in the financial statements, excluding discontinued operation. None (31
December 2017: none 1 January 2017: none) of the Company’s loans and borrowings
will mature in less than one year at the end of the reporting period.
IFRS 7.34.a, 34.c
The Group assessed the concentration of risk with respect to refinancing its debt and and AGB8
concluded it to be low. Access to sources of funding is sufficiently available and debt
maturing within 12 months can be rolled over with existing lenders.
Analysis of financial instruments by remaining contractual maturities
IFRS 7.39.a, b and
The table below summarises the maturity profile of the Group’s and the Company’s AGB11D
financial assets used for managing liquidity risk and financial liabilities at the end of the
reporting period based on contractual undiscounted repayment obligations.
2018
$’000
Financial assets:
Trade and other receivables 24,794 2,984 – 27,778
Cash and short-term deposits 6,117 – – 6,117
Derivatives 170 – – 170
Financial liabilities:
Trade and other payables 17,367 250 – 17,617
Other liabilities 2,974 – – 2,974
Loans and borrowings 1,189 12,817 4,275 18,281
Contingent consideration for business combination 685 – – 685
Derivatives 22 – – 22
Total net undiscounted financial assets/ (liabilities) 8,844 (10,083) (4,275) (5,514)
Total net undiscounted financial assets/ (liabilities) 10,059 (9,279) (3,277) (2,497)
1 January 2017
$’000
Total net undiscounted financial assets/ (liabilities) 4,866 (9,439) (3,277) (7,850)
Total net undiscounted financial assets/ (liabilities) 3,323 12,607 (2,084) 13,846
31 December 2017
$’000
Total net undiscounted financial assets/ (liabilities) 3,635 14,059 (2,540) 15,154
1 January 2017
$’000
Total net undiscounted financial assets/ (liabilities) 3,454 13,527 (2,640) 14,341
The table below shows the contractual expiry by maturity of the Group and Company’s
contingent liabilities and commitments. The maximum amount of the financial
guarantee contracts are allocated to the earliest period in which the guarantee could
be called.
Group
Financial
guarantees 320 245 – 565 15 240 – 255 23 180 – 203
Company
Financial
guarantees – 5,400 – 5,400 – 5,400 – 5,400 – 5,400 – 5,400
Commentary:
Quantitative disclosures
Please refer to commentary no. 7 of Note 40(a) (Credit risk)
Other factors to consider in disclosing liquidity risk
The application guidance in IFRS 7 illustrates the other factors that an entity might also IFRS 7.AGB11F
consider disclosing which include, but are not limited to, whether the entity:
(a) has committed borrowing facilities (e.g., commercial paper facilities) or other lines of
credit (e.g., stand-by credit facilities) that it can access to meet liquidity needs;
(b) holds deposits at central banks to meet liquidity needs;
(c) has very diverse funding sources;
(d) has significant concentrations of liquidity risk in either its assets or its funding sources;
(e) has internal control processes and contingency plans for managing liquidity risk;
(f) has instruments that include accelerated repayment terms (e.g., on the downgrade of
the entity’s credit rating);
(g) has instruments that could require the posting of collateral (e.g., margin calls for
derivatives);
(h) has instruments that allows the entity to choose whether it settles its financial liabilities
by delivering cash (or another financial asset) or by delivering its own shares; or
(i) has instruments that are subject to master netting agreements.
Commentary (continued):
The number of time bands illustrated is only an example. An entity should use its judgement IFRS 7.AGB11
to determine the number of time bands that is suitable for the entity.
When the counterparty has a choice of when an amount is paid, the liability is included on the
basis of the earliest date on which the entity can be required to pay. For example, financial
liabilities that the entity can be required to repay on demand are included in the earliest time
band.
Maturities of financial assets held for liquidity purposes
IFRS 7.AGB11E
IFRS 7.39.c requires an entity to describe how it manages the liquidity risk inherent in the
items disclosed in the quantitative disclosures required in IFRS 7.39.a and b. If financial
assets are readily saleable or expected to generate cash inflows to meet cash outflows on
financial liabilities and if that information is necessary to enable users of its financial
statements to evaluate the nature and extent of liquidation risk. An entity shall disclose a
maturity analysis of financial assets it holds for managing liquidity risks.
Quantitative liquidity risk disclosures
IFRS 7 specifies minimum liquidity risk disclosures, i.e., the contractual maturity analysis of
financial liabilities, required by IFRS 7.39.
FRS 7.AGB11B
IFRS 7 permits derivative liabilities to be excluded from the paragraph 39 maturity analysis,
unless the “contractual maturities are essential for an understanding of the timing of the cash
flows”. The application guidance cites an interest rate swap designated in a cash flow hedging
relationship as an example of such an essential case. Given that the hedged cash flows are
required to be highly probable, the swap would normally be expected to be held to maturity.
IFRS 7.AGB11D
For those derivatives included in the contractual maturity analysis, the guidance still requires
gross cash flows to be disclosed for those derivatives which will involve a gross exchange of
cash flows, such as currency swaps.
IFRS 7 requires issued financial guarantee contracts to be recorded in the contractual IFRS 7.AGB11C.c
maturity analysis based on the maximum amount guaranteed. They are to be allocated to the
earliest date they can be drawn down, irrespective of whether it is likely that those
guarantees will be drawn or the amount that is expected to be paid.
Illustrative disclosure for gross cash flows for those derivatives which will involve gross
exchange of cash flows, such as currency swaps.
Below is an illustration of such a presentation:
Group
$’000
Commentary:
Interest rate risk arises on interest-bearing financial instruments recognised in the balance IFRS 7.AGB22
sheet (e.g., loans and receivables and debt instruments issued) and on some financial
instruments not recognised in the balance sheet (e.g., some loan commitments).
Quantitative disclosures
IFRS 7 requires disclosure of sensitivity analysis for each type of market risk to which an IFRS 7.40.a
entity is exposed at the reporting date, showing how profit or loss and equity would have
been affected by changes in the relevant risk variable that were reasonably possible at that
date. These analyses shall be provided for the whole of an entity’s business. However, an IFRS 7.AGB21
entity may also “drill down” to provide different types of sensitivity analysis for different
classes of financial instruments.
The sensitivity analysis should be based on changes in the risk variable that were IFRS 7.AGB19 and
reasonably possible at the reporting date having considered the economic environments in IG35
which the entity operates, the type of market risk concerned and the time frame over which
the assessment is being made i.e., the period until the entity will next present the analysis
e.g., next annual reporting period. A reasonably possible change should not include remote
or “worst case” scenarios or “stress test”.
An entity should also disclose the methods and assumptions used in preparing the IFRS 7.40.b and c
sensitivity analysis, and changes from the previous period in the methods and assumptions
used, including the reasons for such changes.
Instead of the sensitivity analysis illustrated, IFRS 7 permits an entity to use a sensitivity IFRS 7.41 and
AGB20
analysis that reflects interdependencies between risk variables, such as a value-at-risk
methodology, if it uses this analysis to manage its exposure to financial risks. This applies
even if such a methodology measures only the potential for loss and does not measure the
potential for gain. In such cases, the entity should also disclose an explanation of the
method and objective of the analysis (e.g., whether the model relies on Monte Carlo
simulations), the main parameters and assumptions used (e.g., the holding period and
confidence level), and limitations that may result in the information disclosed not fully
reflecting the fair value of assets and liabilities involved.
When the sensitivity analyses disclosed are unrepresentative of a risk inherent in a financial IFRS 7.42 and IG37-
instrument (e.g., because the end of the reporting period exposure does not reflect 40
exposure during the financial year), the entity shall disclose that fact and the reason it
believes the sensitivity analyses are unrepresentative, including additional disclosures
regarding the risk inherent in that financial instrument.
In this illustration, company-level sensitivity analysis has not been disclosed because IFRS 7.34.b
according to the assumed scenario, XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited is an investment
holding company with no significant net exposure to market price risk. If this is not the
case, the entity should provide company-level disclosures as appropriate.
In this illustration, the interest rate risk sensitivity analysis has been performed for the effect of IFRS 7.IG34
a change in SGD interest rates because it is relevant to the interest rate risk exposure of XYZ
Holdings (Singapore) Limited. An entity might disclose a sensitivity analysis for interest rate
risk for each currency in which the entity has material exposure to interest rate risk.
Illustrative tabular disclosure of interest rate risk sensitivity analysis where more than one
currency is involved:
The table below demonstrates the sensitivity to a reasonably possible change in interest
rates with all other variables held constant, of the Group’s profit before tax (through the
impact on interest expense on floating rate loans and borrowings) and the Group’s equity
(through the impact on other reserves for fixed rate debt securities classified as available-
for-sale).
Group
$’000
2018
- Singapore dollar +15 (XX) (XX)
- US dollar -15 XX XX
2017
- Singapore dollar +15 (XX) (XX)
- US dollar -15 XX XX
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Profit before tax Profit before tax
USD/SGD - strengthened 3% (2017: 3%) –30 –30
- weakened 3% (2017: 3%) +28 +28
USD/RMB - strengthened 4% (2017: 4%) –15 –12
- weakened 4% (2017: 4%) +15 +12
RMB/SGD - strengthened 4% (2017: 4%) +57 +66
- weakened 4% (2017: 4%) –57 –66
Ringgit/SGD - strengthened 3% (2017: 4%) +40 +68
- weakened 3% (2017: 4%) –40 –68
Commentary:
Disclosure of amounts denominated in foreign currencies
The disclosure of exposures to foreign currency amounts is required under the disclosure IFRS 7.31 and 34
principles of IFRS 7.31 (nature and extent of risks) as well as the specific requirement in IFRS
7.34 to disclose summary quantitative data about the entity's exposure to risks (including
foreign currency risks) arising from financial instruments. In this illustration, most of the
information regarding foreign currency risk exposures is presented in Note 40(d), Note 21,
Note 27 and Note 31. These disclosures include a mixture of quantitative data that are
measured in dollar amounts (e.g., cash and short-term deposits amount denominated in foreign
currency) as well as data that are not measured in dollar amounts, e.g., the exposures arising
from trade receivables are represented by the percentage of total trade receivables
denominated in foreign currencies.
Each entity should customise the information disclosed according to its specific circumstances.
Quantitative disclosures
According to IFRS 7, foreign currency risk arises on financial instruments that are denominated IFRS 7.AG B23
in a foreign currency i.e., in a currency other than the functional currency in which they are
measured. For the purpose of IFRS 7, currency risk does not arise from financial instruments
that are non-monetary items or from financial instruments denominated in the functional
currency. Currency translation risk arising from its net investments in foreign operations does
not fall within the definition of foreign currency risk according to IFRS 7.
In the scenario illustrated, there is no impact (other than those affecting net profit) to equity
arising from exposures to currency risk as defined by IFRS 7.
Illustrative disclosure if there are impact to equity arising from exposures to currency risk:
The following table demonstrates the sensitivity of the Group’s profit before tax and equity to
a reasonably possible change in the USD, RMB and Ringgit exchange rates against the
respective functional currencies of the Group entities, with all other variables held constant.
Group
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Profit Equity Profit Equity
before before
tax tax
USD/SGD - strengthened X% (2017: X%) –XX –XX –XX –XX
- weakened X% (2017: X%) +XX +XX +XX +XX
USD/RMB - strengthened X% (2017: X%) –XX –XX –XX –XX
- weakened X% (2017: X%) +XX +XX +XX +XX
RMB/SGD - strengthened X% (2017: X%) –XX –XX –XX –XX
- weakened X% (2017: X%) +XX +XX +XX +XX
Ringgit/SGD - strengthened X% (2017: X%) –XX –XX –XX –XX
- weakened X% (2017: X%) +XX +XX +XX +XX
shares with higher volatility. The Group’s policy is to limit its interest in the latter type
of investments to 25% (2017: 25%) of its entire equity portfolio. Any deviation from
this policy is required to be approved by the CEO and audit committee. At the end of
the reporting period, 24% (2017: 19%) of the Group’s equity portfolio consist of non-
investment grade shares of companies operating in PRC and Singapore, while the
remaining portion of the equity portfolio comprise investment grade shares included in
the Straits Times Index (STI).
Sensitivity analysis for equity price risk
At the end of the reporting period, if the price of the shares held had been 2% (2017: IFRS 7.40,
2%) higher/lower with all other variables held constant, the Group’s profit before tax AGB17-18 and
AGB25-27
would have been $31,000 (2017: $25,000) higher/lower, arising as a result of
higher/lower fair value gains on held for trading investments in equity instruments, and
the Group’s other comprehensive income would have been $35,000 (2017: $17,000)
higher/lower, arising as a result of an increase/decrease in the fair value of equity
securities classified as available-for-sale.
Commentary:
Quantitative disclosures
In this illustration, the sensitivity analysis for equity price risk has been performed by
analysing the effect of a reasonably possible change in STI on the fair value of the equity
instruments held by the Group, as it is assumed that all the quoted equity securities held by
the Group are listed in Singapore.
Capital includes debt and equity items as disclosed in the table below. IAS 1.135.a.i
The primary objective of the Group’s capital management is to ensure that it maintains a IAS 1.135.a
strong credit rating and healthy capital ratios in order to support its business and
maximise shareholder value.
The Group manages its capital structure and makes adjustments to it, in light of changes IAS 1.135.a and c
in economic conditions. To maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Group may adjust
the dividend payment to shareholders, return capital to shareholders or issue new shares.
No changes were made in the objectives, policies or processes during the years ended 31
December 2018 and 31 December 2017.
As disclosed in Note 34(c), a subsidiary of the Group is required by the Foreign Enterprise IAS 1.135.a.ii and d
Law of the PRC to contribute to and maintain a non-distributable statutory reserve fund
whose utilisation is subject to approval by the relevant PRC authorities. This externally
imposed capital requirement has been complied with by the above-mentioned subsidiary
for the financial years ended 31 December 2018 and 2017.
The Group monitors capital using a gearing ratio, which is net debt divided by total capital IAS 1.135.a
plus net debt. The Group’s policy is to keep the gearing ratio between 20% and 40%. The
Group includes within net debt, loans and borrowings (excluding convertible redeemable
preference shares), trade and other payables, less cash and short-term deposits excluding
discontinued operations. Capital includes convertible redeemable preference shares,
equity attributable to the owners of the Company less the fair value adjustment reserve
and the abovementioned restricted statutory reserve fund.
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Commentary:
IAS 1 requires the disclosure of information (as provided to key management personnel) that IAS 1.134 and
enables users of financial statements to evaluate the entity’s objectives, policies and 135
processes for managing capital, including (but not limited to) a description and summary
quantitative data of what it manages as capital, the presence and impact of externally
imposed capital requirements and how the entity is meeting its objectives for managing
capital etc. This note as well as IAS 1.IG10 provide illustrative examples of such disclosures
of an entity that is not a regulated financial institution.
It is important to note that the illustration provided in this note is based on certain
assumed facts regarding circumstances surrounding XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited
and its objectives, policies and processes for managing capital. For example, a gearing
ratio with a specific measurement basis has been disclosed as this is the measure used
to monitor capital. The Group considers both capital and net debt as relevant
components of funding, hence part of its capital management. Other entities may use
different methods to monitor capital or use gearing ratios with different measurement
bases. Disclosures would have to be customised in the light of specific facts and
circumstances applicable to the entity.
Also, an entity may manage capital in a number of ways and be subject to a number of IAS 1.136
different capital requirements. For example, a conglomerate may include entities that
undertake insurance and banking activities, and those entities may also operate in several
jurisdictions. When an aggregate disclosure of capital requirements and how capital is
managed would not provide useful information or distorts a financial statement user’s
understanding of an entity’s capital resources, the entity shall disclose separate information
for each capital requirement to which the entity is subject to.
In this illustration, it is assumed that the externally imposed capital requirement has been IAS 1.135.e
complied with. When an entity has not complied with externally imposed capital
requirements, the consequences of such non-compliance shall be disclosed. IAS 1.IG 11 has
an example that illustrates the application of IAS 1.135.e when an entity has not complied
with externally imposed capital requirement during the period.
For management purposes, the Group is organised into business units based on their IFRS 8.22
products and services, and has four reportable segments as follows:
I. The electronic components segment is a supplier of digital and analogue electronic IFRS 8.12
components for consumer and industrial-grade electronics for manufacturers. This
reportable segment has been formed by aggregating the customer electronic
components segment and the industrial-grade electronics segment, which are
regarded by management to exhibit similar economic characteristics. In making this
judgement, management considers the products and services offered by these IFRS 8.22.aa
segments such as specialised electronic components, energy efficiency, and electrical
architecture are in the areas of common and the segments share common production
facilities and usage of similar raw materials in the production process.
II. The property segment is in the business of constructing, developing and leasing out of
residential and commercial properties.
III. The corporate segment is involved in Group-level corporate services, treasury
functions and investments in marketable securities.
IV. The fire prevention equipment and services segment produces and installs
extinguishers, fire prevention equipment and fire retardant fabrics.
V. The rubber hose segment produces and sells rubber hose. This segment has been
classified as a discontinued operation during the financial year (Note 11).
Except as indicated above, no operating segments have been aggregated to form the IFRS 8.27
above reportable operating segments.
IFRS 8.28.b
Management monitors the operating results of its business units separately for the
purpose of making decisions about resource allocation and performance assessment.
Segment performance is evaluated based on operating profit or loss which in certain
respects, as explained in the table below, is measured differently from operating profit or
loss in the consolidated financial statements. Group financing (including finance costs)
and income taxes are managed on a group basis and are not allocated to operating IFRS 8.27.a
segments.
Transfer prices between operating segments are on an arm’s length basis in a manner
similar to transactions with third parties.
Results:
Interest income – – 430 – – – 430 IFRS 8.23.c
Dividend income – – 526 – – – 526 IFRS 8.23.f
Fair value gains on
investment properties – 489 – – – – 489 IFRS 8.23.f
Depreciation and
amortisation 1,108 925 150 1,080 150 (150) A 3,263 IFRS 8.23.e
Share of results of joint
ventures - 151 - - - - 151 IFRS 8.23.g
Share of results of
associates – 657 – – – – 657 IFRS 8.23.g
Impairment of non- IAS 36.129.a
financial assets 500 – – - 650 (650) A 500 IFRS 8.23.f
Other non-cash expenses 621 107 310 367 – – C 1,405 IFRS 8.23.i
Segment profit/(loss) 2,015 2,001 452 4,020 (551) (880) D 7,057 IFRS 8.23
Assets:
Investment in joint
ventures - 1,674 - - - - 1,674 IFRS 8.24.a
Investment in associates – 10,595 – – – – 10,595 IFRS 8.24.a
Additions to non-current
assets 8,134 2,803 758 – – – E 11,695 IFRS 8.24.b
Segment assets 56,189 22,810 12,450 25,566 2,270 12,489 F 131,774 IFRS 8.23
Segment liabilities 11,234 10,383 1,314 7,890 1,043 20,766 G 52,630 IFRS 8.23
Results:
Interest income – – 327 – – – 327 IFRS 8.23.c
Dividend income – – 406 – – – 406 IFRS 8.23.f
Fair value gains on
investment properties – 129 – – – – 129 IFRS 8.23.f
Depreciation and
amortisation 1,041 883 115 1,051 125 (125) A 3,090 IFRS 8.23.e
Share of results of joint
ventures - 126 - - - - 126 IFRS 8.23.g
Share of results of
associates 94 230 – – – – 324 IFRS 8.23.g
Impairment of non- IAS 36.129.a
financial assets – – – – – – A – IFRS 8.23.f
Other non-cash expenses 534 95 218 345 – – C 1,192 IFRS 8.23.i
Segment profit/(loss) 3,988 3,635 438 3,026 (193) (1,468) D 9,426 IFRS 8.23
Assets:
Investment in joint
ventures - 1,515 - - - - 1,515 IFRS 8.24.a
Investment in associates 536 9,755 – – – – 10,291 IFRS 8.24.a
Additions to non-current
assets 2,872 1,560 221 – – – E 4,653 IFRS 8.24.b
Segment assets 53,826 22,658 11,960 21,929 2,450 12,128 F 124,951 IFRS 8.23
Segment liabilities 9,286 9,257 1,189 6,688 1,130 23,779 G 51,469 IFRS 8.23
As at 1 January 2017
Fire
prevention Rubber Hose Adjustments
Electronic equipment (Discontinued and
components Property Corporate and services operation) eliminations Notes Consolidated
Assets:
Investment in joint
ventures - 1,364 - - - - 1,364 IFRS 8.24.a
Investment in associates – 10,099 – – – – 10,099 IFRS 8.24.a
Segment assets 46,665 20,673 11,000 23,022 2,350 11,768 F 115,478 IFRS 8.23
Segment liabilities 9,480 9,028 1,112 5,888 1,003 24,138 G 50,649 IFRS 8.23
C Other non-cash expenses consist of amortisation of land use rights, share- IFRS 8.28.e
based payments, inventories written-down, provisions, and impairment of
financial assets as presented in the respective notes to the financial
statements.
D The following items are added to/(deducted from) segment profit to arrive at IFRS 8.28.b
“profit before tax from continuing operations” presented in the consolidated
income statement:
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Segment results of discontinued operation 551 193
Share of results of joint ventures 151 126
Share of results of associates 657 324
Profit from inter-segment sales (105) (50)
Finance costs (1,715) (1,512)
Unallocated corporate expenses (419) (549)
(880) (1,468)
F The following items are added to/(deducted from) segment assets to arrive at IFRS 8.28.c
total assets reported in the consolidated balance sheet:
31 December 1 January
2018 2017 2017
$’000 $’000 $’000
Investment in joint ventures 1,674 1,515 1,364
Investment in associates 10,595 10,291 10,099
Deferred tax assets 470 463 455
Inter-segment assets (250) (141) (150)
12,489 12,128 11,768
G The following items are added to/(deducted from) segment liabilities to arrive IFRS 8.28.d
at total liabilities reported in the consolidated balance sheet:
31 December 1 January
2018 2017 2017
$’000 $’000 $’000
Deferred tax liabilities 2,273 1,904 1,517
Income tax payable 2,914 6,417 5,999
Loans and borrowings (including
discontinued operation) 15,604 15,478 16,640
Inter-segment liabilities (25) (20) (18)
20,766 23,779 24,138
31 December 1 January
2018 2017 2018 2017 2017
$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
IFRS 8.33.a.i and b.i
Singapore 86,432 99,496 20,570 19,346 18,585
People’s Republic of China 22,970 23,005 15,896 15,591 14,528
Malaysia 20,990 20,440 5,061 4,138 3,762
Vietnam and others 19,480 17,260 3,082 3,010 2,203
Discontinued operation (13,152) (14,598) (1,016) - -
136,720 145,603 43,593 42,085 39,078
Non-current assets information presented above consist of property, plant and equipment,
investment properties, intangible assets, and land use rights as presented in the
consolidated balance sheet.
Information about a major customer
Revenue from one major customer amount to $15,102,000 (2017: $16,080,000), arising
from sales by the electronics components segment. IFRS 8.34
Commentary:
In addition to a measure of profit or loss and total assets for each reportable segments, entities
are required to disclose the following about each reportable segment if the specified amounts IFRS 8.23
are included in the measure of segment profit or loss reviewed by the chief operating decision
maker (CODM), or are otherwise regularly provided to the CODM, even if not included in that
measure of segment profit or loss:
(a) Revenues from external customers
(b) Revenues from transactions with other operating segments of the same entity
(c) Interest revenue
(d) Interest expense*
(e) Depreciation and amortisation
(f) Material items of income and expense disclosed in accordance with paragraph 86 of IAS 1
Presentation of Financial Statements
(g) The entity’s interest in profit or loss of associates and joint ventures accounted for by the
equity method
(h) Income tax expense or income*
(i) Material non-cash items other than depreciation and amortisation
* In this illustration, interest expense and income tax expense have not been disclosed by
segment as these items are managed on a group basis, and are not provided to the CODM at
the operating segment level.
Commentary (continued):
Aggregation criteria
IFRS 8 requires disclosures of judgements made by management in applying the aggregation IFRS 8.13
criteria in paragraph 12, including a brief description of the operating segments that have been
aggregated in this way and the economic indicators that have been assessed in determining that
the aggregated operating segments share similar economic characteristics.
In this illustration, the Group has applied aggregation criteria in IFRS 8.12 and the disclosure of
the judgements made by management in aggregating the segments is disclosed accordingly.
Discontinued operation
IFRS 8 does not provide specific disclosure requirements for an operating segment classified as
discontinued operation. An entity is therefore not required to provide such segment information
as long as the classification criteria held for sale is met. It is however allowed to continue to
present segment information as long as the definition as operating segment is met.
In this illustration, an entire reportable segment has been classified as discontinued operation in
the current period. As this operating segment still meet the quantitative thresholds for separate IFRS 8.23
reporting, it continues to be reported in the segment information.
Interest income
An entity shall report interest revenue separately from interest expense for each reportable
segment unless a majority of the segment’s revenues are from interest and the CODM relies
primarily on net interest revenue to assess the performance of the segment and make decisions
about resources to be allocated to the segment. In that situation, an entity may report that
segment’s interest revenue net of its interest expense and disclose that it has done so.
Disclosure of operating segment assets and liabilities are required only where such measures are
provided to the CODM.
Explanation of measurements of segment profit or loss, segment assets and segment liabilities
IFRS 8.27.b-d
If not apparent from the disclosures of reconciliations in this note, entities are required to disclose
further information regarding the nature of differences between the measurements of segment
profit or loss, segment assets, segment liabilities, and the entity’s profit or loss before tax and
discontinued operations, assets and liabilities. Those differences could include accounting policies
and policies for allocation of centrally incurred costs, jointly used assets, jointly utilised liabilities
that are necessary for an understanding of the reported segment information.
The following should also be disclosed, where applicable:
- The nature of any changes from prior periods in the measurement methods used to
determine reported segment profit or loss and the effect, if any, of those changes on the
measure of segment profit or loss.
IFRS 8.27.e-f
- The nature and effect of any asymmetrical allocations to reportable segments. For example,
an entity might allocate depreciation expense to a segment without allocating the related
depreciable assets to that segment.
Commentary (continued):
For the purposes of disclosing information about major customers, a group of entities known to
a reporting entity to be under common control shall be considered a single customer, and a
government (national, state, provincial, territorial, local or foreign) and entities known to the
reporting entity to be under the control of that government shall be considered a single
customer.
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
IAS 1.137.a,
2018 XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited | 231 IAS 10.12
XYZ Holdings (Singapore) Limited and its subsidiaries
Illustrating the Statement of Comprehensive Income in one statement with the analysis of
expenses by nature:
2018 2017
Note $’000 $’000 IAS 1.81A.a, IAS 1.102
Continuing operations
Revenue X 136,720 145,603 IAS 1.82.a, IAS 1.102
Illustrating the Statement of Comprehensive Income in one statement with the analysis of
expenses by nature (continued):
2018 2017
Note $’000 $’000 IAS 1.81A.a, IAS 1.102
Attributable to:
Owners of the Company
Total comprehensive income from continuing operations, net of tax X 6,585 7,379 IFRS 5.33.d
Total comprehensive income from discontinued operations, net of tax X (494) (168) IFRS 5.33.d
6,091 7,211
Commentary:
An entity may present components of other comprehensive income either: IAS 1.91
(a) net of related tax effects, as illustrated in the statement of comprehensive income,
or
(b) before related tax effects with one amount shown for the aggregate amount of
income tax relating to those items.
If an entity elects alternative (b), it shall allocate the tax between the items that might be
reclassified subsequently to the profit or loss section and those that will not be
reclassified subsequently to the profit or loss section.
In this illustration, the share of other comprehensive income of associates relates to IAS 1.82A
property revaluation attributable to owners of the associates, an item which will not be
reclassified to profit or loss subsequently.
If an entity has share of other comprehensive income of associates which relates to items
that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss, the item shall be presented under
the group of items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss.
The net defined benefit liability or asset is the aggregate of the present value of the defined IAS 19.8
benefit obligation (derived using a discount rate based on high quality corporate bonds) at
the end of the reporting period reduced by the fair value of plan assets (if any), adjusted for
any effect of limiting a net defined benefit asset to the asset ceiling. The asset ceiling is the
present value of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plan or
reductions in future contributions to the plan.
The cost of providing benefits under the defined benefit plans is determined separately for IAS 19.67
each plan using the projected unit credit method.
Defined benefit costs comprise the following:
IAS 19.120
- Service cost
- Net interest on the net defined benefit liability or asset
- Remeasurements of net defined benefit liability or asset
Service costs which include current service costs, past service costs and gains or losses on IAS 19.8
non-routine settlements are recognised as expense in profit or loss. Past service costs are IAS 19.103
recognised when plan amendment or curtailment occurs.
Net interest on the net defined benefit liability or asset is the change during the period in the IAS 19.8
net defined benefit liability or asset that arises from the passage of time which is determined IAS 19.123
by applying the discount rate based on high quality corporate bonds to the net defined
benefit liability or asset. Net interest on the net defined benefit liability or asset is recognised
as expense or income in profit or loss.
Remeasurements comprising actuarial gains and losses, return on plan assets and any IAS 19.127
IAS 19.122
change in the effect of the asset ceiling (excluding net interest on defined benefit liability)
are recognised immediately in other comprehensive income in the period in which they arise.
Remeasurements are recognised in retained earnings within equity and are not reclassified
to profit or loss in subsequent periods.
Plan assets are assets that are held by a long-term employee benefit fund or qualifying IAS 19.8
insurance policies. Plan assets are not available to the creditors of the Group, nor can they IAS 19.113
be paid directly to the Group. Fair value of plan assets is based on market price information.
When no market price is available, the fair value of plan assets is estimated by discounting
expected future cash flows using a discount rate that reflects both the risk associated with
the plan assets and the maturity or expected disposal date of those assets (or, if they have
no maturity, the expected period until the settlement of the related obligations).
The Group’s right to be reimbursed of some or all of the expenditure required to settle a IAS 19.116
defined benefit obligation is recognised as a separate asset at fair value when and only when
reimbursement is virtually certain.
Contributions from
plan participants
- - - - - - XXX XXX
Liabilities extinguished
on settlements
- - (XXX) - (XXX) - - -
Benefits paid
(XXX) (XXX) (XXX) (XXX) (XXX) (XXX) (XXX) (XXX)
Effects of business
combinations and
disposal XXX (XXX) - - XXX (XXX) - -
Exchange differences
XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX
At 31 December XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX
Assets distributed on
settlements - - (XXX) - (XXX) -
Effects of business
combinations and disposal XXX (XXX) - - XXX (XXX)
Changes in the effect of the asset ceiling are as follow: IAS 19.140.a.iii
IAS 19.141
Funded pension
plans
Singapore plan
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
At 1 January XXX -
Interest income XXX -
Remeasurement gains/(losses)
Changes in the effect of
limiting to asset ceiling1 (XXX) XXX
Exchange differences – –
At 31 December - XXX
1
The maximum economic benefit available is a combination of expected refunds from the plan and
reductions in future contributions.
All equity and debt instruments held have quoted prices in active market. The remaining plan assets do not have quoted market prices in active market. The plan assets IAS 19.143
include a property occupied by a subsidiary of the Group with a fair value of $XXX (2017: $XXX) and ordinary shares of XYZ Holdings Limited with a fair value of $XXX
(2017: $XXX).
2018 2017
% %
Discount rates:
Singapore plan/ post employment medical plan XX XX
US plan XX XX
Future salary increases:
Singapore plan XX XX
US plan XX XX
Future pension increases:
Singapore plan XX XX
US plan XX XX
Post retirement mortality for pensioners at 65:
Singapore plan/ post employment medical plan
Male XX XX
Female XX XX
US plan
Male XX XX
Female XX XX
Healthcare cost increase rate: XX XX
31 December 2018
Unfunded
post-
employment
Singapore medical
Increase/(decrease) Plan US Plan benefits
Discount rates +XX basis points (XXX) (XXX) (XXX)
- XX basis points XXX XXX XXX
Future salary increases +XX % XXX XXX XXX
- XX % (XXX) (XXX) (XXX)
Future pension increases +XX % XXX XXX XXX
- XX % (XXX) (XXX) (XXX)
Post retirement mortality for
pensioners at 65:
Male +XX % XXX XXX XXX
- XX % (XXX) (XXX) (XXX)
Female +XX % XXX XXX XXX
- XX % (XXX) (XXX) (XXX)
Healthcare cost increase rate +XX % XXX XXX XXX
- XX % (XXX) (XXX) (XXX)
The management performed an Asset-Liability Matching Study (ALM) annually. The principal IAS 19.146
technique of the Group’s ALM is to ensure the expected return on assets to be sufficient to
support the desired level of funding arising from the defined benefit plans. The Group’s current
strategic investment strategy consists of 50% of equity instruments, 30% of debt instruments, 15%
of investment properties and 5% of cash. The use of debt instruments in combination with interest
rate swaps will reduce the sensitivities caused by the term of the defined benefit obligation by
25%.
The Group’s defined benefit pension plans are funded by its subsidiaries. The employees of the IAS 19.147.a
Group contribute 6% of the pensionable salary and the remaining residual contributions are paid
by the subsidiaries of the Group.
The Group expects to contribute $XXX (2017: $XXX) to the defined benefit pension plans in 2018. IAS 19.147.b
The average duration of the defined benefit obligation at the end of the reporting period is 18.4
years (2017: 17.5 years). IAS 19.147.c
Commentary:
To meet the disclosure objective of Revised IAS 19 for defined benefit plans, an entity shall IAS 19.136
consider all the following:
(a) the level of detail necessary to satisfy the disclosure requirements,
(b) how much emphasis to place on each of the various requirements,
(c) how much aggregation or disaggregation to undertake; and
(d) whether users of financial statements need additional information to evaluate the
quantitative information disclosed.
If the disclosures provided in accordance with the specific requirements of Revised IAS 19 are IAS 19.137
insufficient to meet the objectives above, the entity shall disclose additional information
necessary to meet those objectives. For example, an entity may present an analysis of the
present value of defined benefit obligation that distinguishes the nature, characteristics and risks
of the obligation. Such a disclosure could distinguish:
- between amounts owing to active members, deferred members, and pensioners
- between vested benefits and accrued but not vested benefits
- between conditional benefits, amounts attributable to future salary increases and other
benefits
An entity shall assess whether all or some disclosures should be disaggregated to distinguish IAS 19.138
plans or groups of plans with materially different risks. For example, an entity may disaggregate
disclosure about plans showing one or more of the following features:
- different geographical locations
- different characteristics such as flat salary pension plans, final salary pension plans or post-
employment medical plans
- different regulatory environments
- different reporting segments
- different funding arrangements (e.g. wholly unfunded, wholly or partly funded)
When disclosing the characteristics of defined benefit plans and risks associated with them, an IAS 19.139
entity shall disclose:
(a) information about the characteristics including
- the nature of benefits provided by the plan (e.g. final salary defined benefit plan or
contribution-based plan with guarantee).
- a description of the regulatory framework in which the plan operates, for example the
level of any minimum funding requirements, and any effect of the regulatory framework
on the plan, such as the asset ceiling.
- a description of any other entity’s responsibilities for the governance of the plan, for
example responsibilities of trustees or of board members of the plan.
(b) a description of the risks to which the plan exposes the entity, focused on any unusual
entity-specific or plan-specific risks, and of any significant concentrations of risk. For
example, if plan assets are invested primarily in one class of investments, e.g. property, the
plan may expose the entity to a concentration of property market risk.
(c) a description of any plan amendments, curtailments and settlements.
An entity shall provide reconciliation from the opening balance to the closing balance for any IAS 19.140.b
reimbursement rights and the related obligation, if applicable.
Commentary (continued):
Past service cost and gains and losses arising from settlements need not be distinguished if they IAS 19.141.d
occur together.
In the financial statements for periods beginning before 1 January 2015, an entity need not IAS 19.173.b
present comparative information for the disclosures about the sensitivity of the defined benefit
obligation.
- Information about the maturity profile of the defined benefit obligation (including, but not IAS 19.147.c
limited to, weighted average duration of the defined benefit obligation).
Multi-employer plans
In this illustration, we do not illustrate multi-employer plans. If the Group participates in a multi-
employer plan and accounts for that plan as a defined benefit plan, it shall disclose the following IAS 19.33.b
in addition to information required by paragraphs 135-147 of the Revised IAS 19:
(a) a description of the funding arrangements, including the method used to determine the IAS 19.148
entity’s rate of contributions and any minimum funding requirements.
(b) a description of the extent to which the entity can be liable to the plan for other entities’
obligations under the terms and conditions of the multi-employer plan.
(c) a description of any agreed allocation of a deficit or a surplus on:
i. wind-up of the plan; or
ii. the entity’s withdrawal from the plan.
(d) if the entity accounts for that plan as if it were a defined contribution plan, it shall disclose
the following, in addition to the information required by (a) – (c) and instead of the
information required by paragraph 139 to 147 of the Revised IAS 19:
i. the fact that the plan is a defined benefit plan.
ii. the reason why sufficient information is not available to enable the entity to account
for the plan as a defined benefit plan.
Commentary (continued):
iv. information about any deficit or surplus in the plan that may affect the amount of
future contributions, including the basis used to determine that deficit or surplus and
the implications, if any, for the entity.
v. an indication of the level of participation of the entity in the plan compared with other
participating entities. Examples of measures that might provide such an indication
include the entity’s proportion of the total contributions to the plan or the entity’s
proportion of the total number of active members, retired members, and former
members entitled to benefits, if that information is available.
Defined benefit plans that share risks between entities under common control
IAS 19.149
In this illustration, we do not illustrate defined benefit plans that share risks between entities
under common control. If an entity participates in a defined benefit plan that shares risks
between entities under common control, it shall disclose:
(a) the contractual agreement or stated policy for charging the net defined benefit cost or the
fact that there is no such policy.
(b) the policy for determining the contribution to be paid by the entity.
(c) if the entity accounts for an allocation of the net defined benefit cost as noted in paragraph
41 of Revised IAS 19 , all the information about the plan as a whole required by paragraph
135-147 of Revised IAS 19.
(d) if the entity accounts for the contribution payable for the period as noted in paragraph 41 of
Revised IAS 19 , the information about the plan as a whole required by paragraphs 135 –
137, 142 - 144 and 147 (a) and (b) of Revised IAS 19.
The information required by (c) and (d) can be disclosed by cross-reference to disclosures in IAS 19.150
another group entity’s financial statements if:
(a) that group entity’s financial statements separately identify and disclose the information
required about the plan; and
(b) that group entity’s financial statements are available to users of the financial statements on
the same terms as the financial statements of the entity and at the same time as, or earlier
than, the financial statements of the entity.
Paragraph 41 of Revised IAS 19 requires an entity participating in a defined benefit plan that IAS 19.41
share risks between entities under common control to obtain information about the plan as a
whole measured in accordance with Revised IAS 19 on the basis of assumptions that apply to the
plan as a whole. If there is a contractual agreement or stated policy for charging to individual
group entities the net defined benefit cost for the plan as a whole measured in accordance with
Revised IAS 19, the entity shall, in its separate or individual financial statements, recognise the
net defined benefit cost so charged. If there is no such agreement or policy, the net defined
benefit cost shall be recognised in the separate or individual financial statements of the group
entity that is legally the sponsoring employer for the plan. The other group entities shall, in their
separate or individual financial statements, recognise a cost equal to their contribution payable
for the period.
The Group applies hedge accounting for certain hedging relationships which qualify for hedge IFRS 7.21
accounting.
fair value hedges when hedging the exposure to changes in fair value of a recognised IFRS 9.6.5.2.a
asset or liability or an unrecognised firm commitment
cash flow hedges when hedging exposure to variability in cash flows that is either IFRS 9.6.5.2.b
The change in the fair value of a hedging derivative is recognised in profit or loss or other IFRS 9.6.5.8
comprehensive income if the hedging instrument hedges an equity instrument for which the
Group has elected to present changes in fair value in other comprehensive income. The
change in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the risk hedged is recorded as a part
of the carrying value of the hedged item and is also recognised in profit or loss. The change in
fair value of the hedged item which is an equity instrument for which an entity has elected to
present changes in fair value in other comprehensive income, shall remain in other
comprehensive income.
For fair value hedges relating to items carried at amortised cost, the adjustment to carrying IFRS 9.6.5.10
value is amortised through profit or loss over the remaining term of the hedge using the
effective interest rate method. Effective interest rate amortisation may begin as soon as an
adjustment exists and no later than when the hedged item ceases to be adjusted for changes in
its fair value attributable to the risk being hedged.
For hedged item that is a debt instrument measured at fair value through other IFRS 9.6.5.10
comprehensive, the adjustment to be amortised through profit or loss is the amount that
represents the cumulative gain or loss recognised in other comprehensive income. If the
hedged item is derecognised, the unamortised fair value is recognised immediately in profit or
loss.
IFRS 9.6.5.9
When an unrecognised firm commitment is designated as a hedged item, the subsequent
cumulative change in the fair value of the firm commitment attributable to the hedged risk is
recognised as an asset or liability to include the cumulative change in fair value of the hedged
item that was recognised in the balance sheet.
X. Hedging activities
The Group and the Company are exposed to financial risks from its operations and the use of IFRS 7.21A
financial instruments. The board of directors reviews and agrees on policies and procedures
for the management of these risks, which are executed by the Chief Financial Officer, Head of
Treasury and Head of Credit Control. The Audit Committee provides independent oversight to
the effectiveness of the risk management process.
The Group’s activities expose it to foreign currency risk and commodity risk. In order to
minimise any adverse effects on the financial performance of the Group, derivative financial
instruments, such as foreign exchange forward contracts, foreign currency option contracts
and commodity forward contracts are used to hedge certain foreign currency risk exposures
and commodity price exposures. In addition, the Group is also exposed to changes in market
interest rates as most of the Group’s borrowings are fixed interest rates borrowings. It is the
Group’s policy that no trading in derivatives for speculative purposes may be undertaken.
The following are details regarding the Group’s and Company’s exposure to the above
mentioned financial risks and the objectives, policies and processes for the management of
these risks.
Commentary:
Hedge accounting
(a) an entity’s risk management strategy and how it is applied to manage risk;
(b) how the entity’s hedging activities may affect the amount, timing and uncertainty of its
future cash flows; and
(c) the effect that hedge accounting has had on the entity’s statement of financial position,
statement of comprehensive income and statement of changes in equity
IFRS 7.21B
The required disclosures for hedge accounting are required to be presented in a single note or
separate section on its financial statements. However, an entity need not duplicate information
that is already presented elsewhere, provided that the information is incorporated by cross-
reference from the financial statements to some other statements such as management
commentary or risk report that is available to users of the financial statements on the same terms
as the financial statements and at the same time. Without the information incorporated by cross-
reference, the financial statements are incomplete.
IFRS 7.21C
IFRS 7 requires each entity to determine each risk category on the basis of risk exposures an
entity decides to hedge and for which hedge accounting is applied and determine risk categories
consistently for all hedge accounting disclosures.
To meet the objectives in , an entity shall determine how much detail to disclose, how much IFRS 7.21D
emphasis is place on different aspects of the disclosure requirements, the appropriate level of
aggregation or disaggregation, and whether users of financial statements need additional
explanation to evaluate the quantitative information disclosed. However, an entity shall use the
same level of aggregation or disaggregation it uses for disclosure requirements of related
information in IFRS 7 and IFRS 13.
Weighted average hedged rate for the year X.XX IFRS 7.23B.b
Change in value of the hedge item used as the basis for XXX
recognising hedge ineffectiveness for the period IFRS 7.24B.b.ii
Balances in the cash flow hedge reserve XXX
Hedging gains or losses for the period recognised in OCI XXX IFRS 7.24C.b.ii
Line item in the income statement which includes the hedge Other expenses
ineffectiveness IFRS 7.24C.b.iv
Amount reclassified from OCI to profit or loss XXX IFRS 7.24C.b.v
Line item in the income statement which includes the Revenue
reclassification adjustment IFRS 7.23B.b
Weighted average hedged rate for the year X.XX
Line item in the balance sheet that includes the hedged item Derivative financial
IFRS 7.24A.b
liabilities
Change in fair value used for measuring ineffectiveness for the XXX IFRS 7.24A.c
period
Notional amount XXX IFRS 7.24A.d
IFRS 7.24C.b.i
Hedging gains or losses for the period recognised in OCI XXX
IFRS 7.24C.b.ii
Hedge ineffectiveness recognised in profit or loss XXX
Line item in the income statement which includes the hedge Other expenses IFRS 7.24C.b.iii
ineffectiveness
Amount reclassified from OCI to profit or loss XXX IFRS 7.24C.b.iv
Line item in the income statement which includes the Cost of sales IFRS 7.24C.b.v
reclassification adjustment
Weighted average hedged rate for the year X.XX IFRS 7.23B.b
Included in loans at 31 December 2018 was a borrowing of USDXXX which has been IFRS 7.22A
designated as a hedge of the net investment in the two subsidiaries in the United States, XX
Inc. and XXX Inc. This borrowing is being used to hedge the Group’s exposure to foreign
exchange risk on these investments.
IFRS 7.22B.b
The Group’s objective is to hedge the foreign currency exposure of both the investments in
foreign subsidiaries. Gains or losses on the retranslation of this borrowing are transferred to
other comprehensive income to offset any gains or losses on translation of the net
investments in the subsidiaries. The nominal amount of the USD borrowings approximates the
cost of investments in the subsidiaries. The hedge is determined to be 1:1 and the hedge is IFRS 7.22B.c
expected to be highly effective.
Line item in the balance sheet that includes the hedging Loans and borrowings IFRS 7.24A.b
instruments
Notional amount XXX IFRS 7.24A.d
Hedging gains or losses for the period recognised in OCI XXX IFRS 7.24C.b.i
Weighted average hedged rate for the year X.XX IFRS 7.23B
IFRS 7.24.c
The cash flow hedge reserve contains the effective portion of the cash flow hedge IAS 1.79.b
relationships incurred as at the reporting date. $XXX are made up of the net movements in
cash flow hedges and the effective portion of the forward commodity contract, net of tax.
The cost of hedging reserve contains cumulative change in fair value of time value of options
and forward element of forward contracts not designated as hedging instruments in hedge
relationships, net of tax.
The foreign currency translation reserve represents exchange differences arising from the
translation of the financial statements of foreign operations whose functional currencies are
different from that of the Group’s presentation currency and the gains or losses arising from
foreign exchange revaluation of borrowing used as hedging instrument in a net investment
hedge.
Group
Foreign
Cost of currency
Hedging hedging translation
reserve reserve reserve
$’000 $’000 $’000
Opening balance XXX XXX XXX
IFRS 7.24E.a
Cash flow hedges
(a) Foreign currency risk IFRS 7.24E.b
Effective portion of changes in fair value of hedging instruments IFRS 7.24E.c
- USD/SGD forecast sales XXX - -
- GBP/SGD forecast purchases XXX - -
Net amount reclassified to profit or loss (XXX)
(b) Commodity risk
Effective portion of changes in fair value of hedging instruments
- Forward commodity contract XXX - -
Net amount reclassified to profit or loss (XXX) - -
Cost of hedging reserves
Fair value changes
- Time value of options - XXX -
- Forward elements of forward contracts - XXX -
Net amount reclassified to profit or loss for
- Time value of options - (XXX) -
- Forward elements of forward contracts - (XXX) -
Hedge of net investment in foreign operations
USD foreign denominated borrowings - - XXX
Foreign currency translation - - (XXX)
Closing balance XXX XXX XXX
Commentary:
An entity shall explain its risk management strategy for each risk, category of risk exposures that IFRS 7.22A, 22B
it decides to hedge and for which hedge accounting is applied. This explanation should enable
users of financial statements to evaluate:
(a) How each risk arises
(b) How the entity manages each risk; this includes whether the entity hedges an item in its
entirety for all risks or hedges a risk component (or components) of an item and why
(c) The extent of risk exposures that the entity manages
To meet the requirements above, the information should include a description of
(a) the hedging instruments that are used (and how they are used) to hedge risk exposures;
(b) how the entity determines the economic relationship between the hedged item and the
hedging instrument for the purpose of assessing hedge effectiveness; and
(c) how the entity establishes the hedge ratio and what the sources of hedge ineffectiveness are.
In this illustration, the Group does not designate a specific risk component as hedged item. If the IFRS 7.22C
group designates a specific risk component as a hedged item, the Group shall provide the
following qualitative and quantitative information about:
(a) how the entity determined the risk component that is designated as the hedged item
(including a description of the nature of the relationship between the risk component and the
item as a whole); and
(b) how the risk component relates to the item in its entirety.
If the Group has situations in which an entity frequently resets (i.e. discontinues and restarts) IFRS 7.23C
hedging relationships because both the hedging instrument and the hedged item frequently
change (i.e. the entity uses a dynamic process in which both the exposure and the hedging
instruments used to manage that exposure do not remain the same for long, the entity:
(a) is exempt from providing the disclosures required by paragraph 23A and 23B of IFRS 7.
(b) shall disclose:
(i) information about what the ultimate risk management strategy is in relation to those
hedging relationships
(ii) a description of how its risk management strategy by using the hedge accounting and
designating those particular hedging relationships; and
(iii) an indication of how frequently the hedging relationships are discontinued and
restarted as part of the entity’s process in relation to those hedging relationships
IFRS 7R.24B.a.v
In this illustration, the Group does not have any hedged item that have ceased to be adjusted for
hedging gains and losses.
If the Group has any hedged item that has ceased to be adjusted for hedging gains and losses, it
shall disclose the accumulated amount of fair value hedge adjustments on the hedged item
remaining in the balance sheet.
Commentary:
Fair value hedges
In this illustration, the Group does not expect hedge ineffectiveness arising from its fair value
hedge.
If the Group expects hedge ineffectiveness arising from its fair value hedge, it shall disclose:
(a) the change in fair value of the hedged item used as the basis for recognising hedge IFRS 7.24B.a.iv
ineffectiveness for the period
(b) hedge ineffectiveness – i.e. The difference between the hedging gains or losses of the hedging IFRS 7.24C.a.i
instrument and the hedge item
(c) the line item in the statement of comprehensive income that includes the hedge IFRS 7.24C.a.ii
ineffectiveness.
Cash flow hedges and hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation
In this illustration, the Group does not have any hedging relationships for which hedge accounting
is no longer applied.
If the Group has any hedging relationships for which hedge accounting is no longer applied, it shall IFRS 7.24B.b.iii
disclose the balances remaining in the cash flow hedge and the foreign currency translation
reserve.
In this illustration, the Group does not have cash flow hedges for which hedge accounting had been
used in the previous period, but for which the hedged future cash flows are no longer expected to
occur.
If the Group has cash flow hedges for which hedge accounting had been used in the previous
period, but for which the hedged future cash flows are no longer expected to occur, it shall
disclose
- a description of the forecast transaction IFRS 7.23F
- the amount reclassified from the cash flow hedge reserve into profit or loss as a IFRS 7.24C.b.iv
reclassification adjustment.
In this illustration, the Group does not hedge net positions.
If the Group has hedges of net positions, it shall disclose the hedging gains and losses recognised in
IFRS 7.24C.b.vi
a separate line item in the statement of comprehensive income.
Option to designate a credit exposure as measured at fair value through profit or loss
If an entity designated a financial instrument, or a proportion of it, as measured at fair value
IFRS 7.24G
through profit or loss because it uses a credit derivative to manage the credit risk of that financial
instrument it shall disclose:
(a) for credit derivatives that have been used to manage the credit risk of financial instruments
designated as measured at fair value through profit or loss in accordance with paragraph
6.7.1 of IFRS 9, a reconciliation of each of the nominal amount and the fair value at the
beginning and at the end of the period;
(b) the gain or loss recognised in profit or loss on designation of a financial instrument, or a
proportion of it, as measured at fair value through profit or loss in accordance with paragraph
6.7.1 of IFRS 9; and
(c) on discontinuation of measuring a financial instrument, or a proportion of it, at fair value
through profit or loss, that financial instrument's fair value that has become the new carrying
amount in accordance with paragraph 6.7.4 of IFRS 9 and the related nominal or principal
amount (except for providing comparative information in accordance with FRS 1, an entity
does not need to continue this disclosure in subsequent periods).
About EY
EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory
services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build
trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the
world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver
on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a
critical role in building a better working world for our people, for
our clients and for our communities.
Ernst & Young LLP (UEN T08LL0859H) is a limited liability partnership registered in
Singapore under the Limited Liability Partnerships Act (Chapter 163A).
This material has been prepared for general informational purposes only and is not intended
to be relied upon as accounting, tax or other professional advice. Please refer to your
advisors for specific advice.
ey.com