Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UNIT 3
THE DESCRIPTION & CLASSIFICATION
OF ENGLISH SPEECH SOUNDS
Speech sounds as segments or phones
A segment
Any discrete unit or phone, produced by the vocal apparatus, or a representation of such a unit.
In linguistics (and phonetics), segment is used primarily “to refer to any discreet unit that can be
identified, either physically or auditorily, in the stream of speech” (after A Dictionary of Linguistics
& Phonetics, David Crystal, 2003, pp. 408–409).
- Sound waves are continuous, but to a large extent we perceive speech as segmented and tend to
perceive differences between segment types as categorical.
- Segment types can be classified according to the way they are produced in the vocal tract (i.e.
an articulatory rather than acoustic classification).
A phone
In phonetics, the smallest perceptible segment is a phone as an unanalyzed sound of a language. It is
the smallest identifiable unit found in a stream of speech that is able to be transcribed with an IPA
symbol.
In spoken languages, a segment may be a consonant, vowel, tone, or stress.
In this course the term segment is used as to name a speech unit at the level of a sound that can be
identified from a larger unit like syllable. For example, there are 3 segments [ h ], [& ], [ t ] in the
sound sequence [ h&t ].
Vowels & Consonants – A major division among English speech sounds
In English, there are 44 basic speech sounds that can be grouped into 2 major classes: 24
consonants and 20 vowels. This basic division is made based on the distinguishing features or
phonetic properties that members in each class may share.
Speech sounds can be divided into vowels and consonants, based on the phonetic properties or
distinguishing features that the members of each class share. Vowels and consonants can be
distinguished on the basis of difference in 1) articulation 2) acoustics 3) function
Table 3.1 the major difference between consonants and vowels
(Reference books: O’Grady, Wiliiam & Michael Dobrovolsky (1993) Contemporary Linguistics -
An introduction, St. Martin Press, New York, p. 18)
15
UNIT 4
THE ENGLISH CONSONANTS
A. Definition
The consonant is a speech sound produced with a complete or partial obstruction of the air stream in
the vocal tract.
B. Description
The consonants can be described in terms of articulatory parameters:
I. Place of articulation
(This tells us the points where the articulators actually touch or are the closest)
In phonetics, the place of articulation (also point of articulation) of a consonant is the point of
contact, where an obstruction occurs in the vocal tract between an active (moving) articulator
(typically some part of the tongue) and a passive (stationary) articulator (typically some part of the
roof of the mouth). Along with the manner of articulation and phonation, this gives the consonant its
distinctive sound.
Types of articulation
A place of articulation is defined as both the active and passive articulators. For instance, the active
lower lip may contact either a passive upper lip (bilabial, like [m]) or the upper teeth (labiodental,
like [f]). The hard palate may be contacted by either the front or the back of the tongue. If the front
of the tongue is used, the place is called retroflex; if back of the tongue ("dorsum") is used, the place
is called "dorsal-palatal", or more commonly, just palatal.
There are five basic active articulators: the lip ("labial consonants"), the flexible front of the tongue
("coronal consonants"), the middle/back of the tongue ("dorsal consonants"), the root of the tongue
together with the epiglottis ("radical consonants"), and the larynx ("laryngeal consonants"). These
articulators can act independently of each other, and two or more may work together in what is
called coarticulation (see below).
The passive articulation, on the other hand, is a continuum without many clear-cut boundaries. The
places linguolabial and interdental, interdental and dental, dental and alveolar, alveolar and palatal,
palatal and velar, velar and uvular merge into one another, and a consonant may be pronounced
somewhere between the named places.
In addition, when the front of the tongue is used, it may be the upper surface or blade of the tongue
that makes contact ("laminal consonants"), the tip of the tongue ("apical consonants"), or the under
surface ("sub-apical consonants"). These articulations also merge into one another without clear
boundaries.
Consonants that have the same place of articulation, such as alveolar [n, t, d, s, z, l] in English, are
said to be homorganic.
16
List of places where the main types of obstruction may occur
Fig. 13 Dental: between the front of Fig. 14 Alveolar: between the front of the
the tongue and the top teeth tongue and the ridge behind the gums
17
Apart from these places of articulation (for English phonetics), there are also:
• Retroflex: in "true" retroflexes, the tongue curls back so the underside touches the palate
• Uvular: between the back of the tongue and the uvula (which hangs down in the back of the
mouth)
• Pharyngeal: between the root of the tongue and the back of the throat (the pharynx)
• Epiglotto-pharyngeal: between the epiglottis and the back of the throat
• Epiglottal: between the aryepiglottal folds and the epiglottis (see larynx)
18
Affricate: can be seen as a sequence
of a stop and a fricative which have
the same or similar places of
articulation. They are transcribed
using the symbols for the stop and the
fricative. e.g. [tS], [dZ]
Fig.20 The silence phase Fig.21 The release phase
19
Table 2 Manner of articulation: 6 major types of stricture degrees
Clear [ l ] vs dark [ 5 ]
It is a fact that quite a few Vietnamese learners of English fail to perform the correct form of dark [ 5
] in such sequences as [aI5 ] ( I’ll ). Most of them pronounce this dark [ 5 ] as [ n ] as in [ sku:n ] in
stead of [ sku:5 ]. Few of them realize that this velarized form can function as the back vowel [ U ] in
Vietnamese spelling and pronunciation. The evidence is that the Vietnamese word “hiu” sounds a bit
like “hill” [ hI 5 ]. As result, for some of them, [ kV5tS@ ] is made [ kVntS@ ]
Clear [ l ] (before a vowel) dark [ 5 ] (after a vowel)
I’ll [ aI5 ]
child [ tSaI 5 ]
while [ waI5 ]
owl [ aU5 ]
oil [ OI5 ]
meal [ mi:5 ]
school [ skU5 ]
useful [ ju:f5 ]
howl how
[ haU5] [ haU ]
fire-fire
[ faI5 ] [ faI@ ]
mile-mind
[l] [5] [ maI5 ] [maInd ]
20
Further reading (From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In linguistics, manner of articulation describes how the tongue, lips, and other speech organs
involved in making a sound make contact. Often the concept is only used for the production of
consonants. For any place of articulation, there may be several manners, and therefore several
homorganic consonants. One parameter of manner is stricture, that is, how closely the speech
organs approach one another. Parameters other than stricture are those involved in the ar sounds
(taps and trills), and the sibilancy of fricatives. Often nasality and laterality are included in manner,
but phoneticians such as Peter Ladefoged consider them to be independent. Approximants are
speech sounds that could be regarded as intermediate between vowels and typical consonants. In the
articulation of approximants, articulatory organs produce a narrowing of the vocal tract, but leave
enough space for air to flow without much audible turbulence. Approximants are therefore more
open than fricatives. This class of sounds includes lateral approximants like [l], as in lip, and
approximants like [j] and [w] in yes and well which correspond closely to vowels and semivowels.
Palatal approximants correspond to front vowels, velar approximants to back vowels, and labialized
approximants to rounded vowels. They are typically briefer and closer than the corresponding
vowels. When emphasized, approximants may be slightly fricated (that is, the airstream may
become slightly turbulent), which is reminiscent of fricatives. Examples are the y of English yes!
(especially when lengthened) Occasionally the glottal "fricatives" are called approximants, since [h]
typically has no more frication than voiceless approximants, but they are often phonations of the
glottis without any accompanying manner or place of articulation. A stop cuts off airflow through
the mouth. Airflow through the nose does not matter -- you can have both oral and nasal stops. Oral
stops are often called plosives, including in the IPA chart. Nasal stops are usually just called nasals.
Approximants that are apical or laminal are often called liquids (e.g., [r], [l]). Approximants that
correspond to vowels are often called glides (e.g., [j] corresponds to [i], [w] to [u]).
2 subclasses of approximants:
Liquids [ l, r ] & Glides [ w, j ]
Approximants:
no major obstruction
no auditory effect of friction
Liquids [ l, r ]: Glides [ w, j ]:
characterized with high level of sonority characterized with their dual nature
can be syllable nuclei, e.g. [teIbl] predominantly vocalic (like vowel)
can be consonant, e.g. [leIk] distribution: consonantal
[ju:nIvs tI ] , [ nju:]
For some Vietnamese learners of English who come from the Northern part of Vietnam, the English
glide [ w ] is realized phonetically as [ u: ] due to the fact that in this northern dialect, there is no
speech sound like [ w ] in the sound system of Hanoi dialect. When performing [ w ], these people
may stay too long in the nucleus [ u: ] and thus fail to perform the gliding to [ @ ]. For some of them,
the phonetic form [ wUld ] may be pronounced as [ Uld ]. The same can be said to the glide [ j ]
which can be articulated by starting with the vowel [ i: ] then rapidly gliding into [ @ ]. Accordingly,
[ ju:niv3:s@tI ] may be realized as [ i:unIv3:s@tI ].
21