You are on page 1of 8

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Success of infrazygomatic crest bone


screws: patient age, insertion angle, sinus
penetration, and terminal insertion
torque
Chris H. Chang,a Jia-Hong Lin,a and W. Eugene Robertsb
Hsinchu, Taiwan, Indianapolis, Ind, Loma Linda, Calif, and St Louis, Mo

Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess the 6-month survival (success) rate for infrazygomatic crest
(IZC) bone screws relative to patient age, insertion angle, sinus penetration, and terminal insertion torque.
Methods: One hundred consecutive patients (27 males, 73 females; mean age 25.8 years; age range,
11.0-53.8 years) received IZC temporary anchorage devices (TADs) bilaterally (n 5 200). Each TAD was routinely
loaded with up to 14 oz (397 g or 389 cN), reactivated monthly, and followed for 6 months. Terminal insertion tor-
que was measured, and radiographs were assessed to determine the length of the TAD engaged in bone and
depth of penetration into the maxillary sinus. Results: Compared with nonpenetrating IZC TADs, the mean results
for the 96 (48%) TADs that did penetrate the sinus were: 3.23 mm of sinus penetration, 21.3% decrease in terminal
insertion torque, and 31.5% less bone contact at the TAD osseous interface. Perforation prevalence increased
with age from 35.7% (11-19 years) to 62.5% (.30 years) (P \0.01). Terminal insertion torque increased from
11-19 years to 20-29 years because of increasing bone density with age but then decreased at .30 years
because of increased incidence of sinus penetration (P \0.05). Sinus penetration had no significant effect on
IZC TAD survival. About 5% of the devices did fail when the final insertion torque was significantly (P \0.05)
decreased to 7.37 N-cm compared with the mean torque of 11.63 N-cm for successful TADs. Conclusions:
Both sinus perforation and IZC bone quality increased with age. Sinus penetration did not significantly affect
the 6 month survival rate of IZC TADs because the loss of bone quantity at the interface was offset by the age-
related increase in bone quality at the IZC site. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2022;161:783-90)

S
keletal anchorage was a major advance in the bone quality (density and osseous contact) at an implant
1990s1,2 that largely offset the need for extraoral interface.7,8
anchorage.3 Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) Interradicular TADs are commonly inserted between
provide firm osseous anchorage, but they may move the roots of teeth,9-11 but infrazygomatic crest (IZC)
within supporting bone.4 Clinical procedures and TAD bone screws (BS) are extraalveolar devices placed
specifications that affect movement within bone and de- buccal to the roots of the maxillary molars.12-14
vice failure are unclear. TADs have proven effective for Extraalveolar TADs are designed to avoid interfering
retraction of the arches, require minimal patient compli- with the path of tooth movement, particularly during
ance, and are readily removed after completion of treat- arch retraction.15 Increased cortical bone engagement16
ment.5,6 Terminal insertion torque is a reliable index for is directly related to the terminal insertion torque that
provides stability to anchor retraction of entire arches.17
a
Adults commonly require intermaxillary correction, so
Private practice, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
b
Indiana University and Purdue University, Indianapolis, Ind; and Loma Linda reliable extraalveolar TADs for patients aged .30 years
University, Loma Linda, Calif; and Saint Louis University, St Louis, Mo. are a priority.15 Patients with \6 mm of alveolar bone
All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Po- thickness inferior to the floor of the sinus are susceptible
tential Conflicts of Interest, and none were reported.
Address correspondence to: Jia-Hong Lin, 4400 Spruce St, Apt D5, Philadelphia, to perforation with $ 8 mm IZC TADs.12,14 The relation-
PA 19104; e-mail, alexlinjh@gmail.com. ship of sinus penetration to IZC TADs stability and fail-
Submitted, October 2020; revised and accepted, January 2021. ure is unknown.
0889-5406/$36.00
Ó 2022. Kravitz and Kusnoto18 reported that a small penetra-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.01.028 tion (\2 mm) through the Schneiderian membrane heals
783
784 Chang, Lin, and Roberts

Fig 1. A, Ideal insertion site (pink) is shown for IZC TAD. B, A TAD is placed at the IZC eminence on the
buccal aspect of the posterior maxillary alveolar process. C, The maxillary sinus is medially adjacent to
the IZC TAD site.

Fig 2. Design specifications for IZC TADs

spontaneously. Bicortical engagement with the floor of IZC anchorage were retrospectively sampled. The total
the sinus is thought to enhance postoperative stability sample was 200 consecutive 2 3 12-mm stainless-
for dental implants.19,20 Jia et al. suggested the same steel (SS) OrthoBoneScrews (Newton A, HsinChu City,
for TADs,21 recommending a penetration of \1 mm Taiwan) that were placed bilaterally in the IZCs of 27
into the sinus as optimal. males and 73 females with a mean age of 25.8 years
Compared with adolescents, adults usually have a (range, 11.0-53.8 years).
higher quality bone (ie, increased density and a lower All TADs were placed buccal to the roots of the maxil-
turnover rate). However, the maxillary sinuses of adults lary molars (Fig 1) by one experienced clinician
are larger,22 so sinus penetration for TADs is more likely. according to a well-established clinical protocol.13
The purpose of this research is to investigate IZC TADs Each self-drilling TAD (Fig 2) was inserted perpendicular
survival (success) relative to patient age, TAD insertion to the approximately 1-mm-thick cortical plate. As the
angle, sinus perforation, and terminal insertion torque. cortex was penetrated, the TAD was gradually rotated
The hypothesis is sinus perforation does not affect 50 -60 to the occlusal plane (Figs 3, A-C). The final po-
the 6mo survival rate or the insertion torque for 2 3 sition of the screw head was about 5 mm superficial to
12-mm IZC TADs. the soft tissue, which was near the level of the gingival
crest (Fig 4). According to the specific treatment
plan, prestretched power chains with a force range of
MATERIAL AND METHODS 8-14 oz (227-397 g or 223-389 cN) were attached
A comprehensive evaluation of IZC TAD survival (suc- immediately and reactivated every month.13,23
cess) was approved by an Institutional Review Board A dedicated torque tester (Newton) measured the
(Institutional Review Board approval No. 1607517021). maximum insertion torque during the terminal rotation
One hundred consecutive patients requiring bilateral to achieve the desired position. A CBCT (3D eXam plus,

June 2022  Vol 161  Issue 6 American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Chang, Lin, and Roberts 785


Fig 3. A, 90 orientation of the IZC TAD is shown at the start of the installation procedure. B, The
approximately 1-mm bone plate is penetrated on the buccal surface. C, The axial inclination of the
TAD is progressively increased about 50 -60 as it is screwed into place.

Fig 4. A, 1M: Right buccal view of a full cusp Class II malocclusion at the initiation of maxillary retrac-
tion with IZC anchorage. B, 7M: Progress after 6 mo of maxillary retraction. C, 14M: Progress after 13
mo of maxillary retraction. D, 17M: Class I molar relationship is achieved after 16 mo of maxillary retrac-
tion with IZC TAD anchorage.

KaVo Dental, Biberach, Germany) image captured imme- RESULTS


diately after placement was used to evaluate the inci-
dence and amount of sinus penetration or perforation None of the patients showed clinical signs of sinusitis
(Fig 5). If a perforation was evident, prophylactic antibi- after TAD placement. The Table shows that 96 of 200
otics were administered: 250 mg of oral amoxicillin every IZC TADs (48%) perforated the maxillary sinus. The final
8 hours for 3 days. There were no signs or symptoms of insertion torque for TADs perforating the sinus floor was
TADs contacting the roots of adjacent teeth for any of 9.97 N-cm compared with 12.67N-cm for those that did
the patients sampled. Measurements included: (1) depth not enter the sinus (P \0.001). Perforating TADs had
of penetration into the sinus (if any), (2) length of the 5.17 mm of linear bone contact than 7.55 mm for non-
screw surface in contact with bone (osseous interface), perforating TADs (P \0.001). Overall, bone contact was
and (3) insertion angle of the TAD relative to the maxil- significantly greater (P \0.01) on the right (6.88 mm)
lary first molar axis and the occlusal plane. Survival of than on the left side (5.95 mm). The length of the TAD
IZC TAD anchorage was followed for 6 months. The tip penetrating the sinus was a mean of 3.23 mm, but
data were analyzed with a 2-tailed Student t test and a there was no significant difference between the right
chi-square test. Probability (P \0.05) was the minimum (3.63 mm) and left (2.63 mm) sides. Angulation of
level of significance for mean differences between the TAD to the first molar root was significantly
groups. (P \0.001) greater for all IZC TADs placed on the right

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics June 2022  Vol 161  Issue 6
786 Chang, Lin, and Roberts

Fig 5. A, A CBCT slice reveals the position of an IZC TAD. The length of the screw engaged in the bone
(LB) was measured (blue). The angle (a) is delineated between the IZC TAD axis (red) and the maxillary
first molar axis (green); the angle (b) is shown relating the IZC TAD axis to the occlusal plane (orange).
B, A CBCT slice of an IZC TAD perforating into the maxillary sinus. The length of the penetration portion
of the screw (LS) was measured (pink) in addition to the other parameters listed above.

Table. Baseline characteristics of IZC miniscrews: left vs right and perforation vs no perforation
Total Perforation No Perforation

Perforation No Perforation Left Right Left Right Left Right

Characteristics n 5 96 n 5 104 n 5 100 n 5 100 n 5 58 n 5 38 n 5 42 n 5 62


Torque mean (N-cm) 9.97 12.67*** 11.05 11.70 9.71 10.37 12.90 12.53
Perforation depth mean (N-cm) 3.23 - - 3.63 2.63 - -
Angle to maxillary first molar mean ( ) 30.71 32.61 29.61 33.80*** 29.19 32.97 30.16 34.31
Angle to occlusal plane mean ( ) 56.05 55.94 57.98 54.01** 57.65 53.66 58.42 54.23
Bony contact mean (mm) 5.17 7.55*** 5.95 6.88** 4.91 5.55 7.33 7.70

**P \0.01; ***P \0.001.

(33.8 ) than the left side (29.6 ). Angulation to the records, and (4) patient left the practice (Fig 8). Sinus-
occlusal plane was significantly greater (P \0.01) on perforating TADs (n 5 87) had a higher (96.55%) but
the left (58.0 ) than on the right side (54.0 ) (Table). nonsignificant 6-month survival rate than nonperforat-
There was an inverse relationship between terminal ing TADs (94.94%) (n 5 99) (Fig 9). The failed TADs all
torque levels and depth of sinus penetration (Fig 6). showed signs of mobility and were removed or reinserted
The perforation rate was significantly related to age: at another location. The insertion torque for TADs that
$30 years (62.5%) compared with 20-29 years (46.6%; failed was 7.37 N-cm, which was significantly
P \0.05) and 11-19 years (35.7%; P \0.01). Terminal (P \0.05) lower than for those that survived (11.63
torque was significantly (P \0.01) increased only for N-cm) (Fig 10). There was no significant relationship be-
the 20-29 year group (12.45 N-cm) (Fig 7). Among the tween sinus perforation and IZC TAD failure, but the
100 patients, 30 experienced unilateral perforation, insertion torque was significantly decreased for sinus-
and the mean torque was 1.97N-cm lower (P \0.05) penetrating TADs, so the hypothesis was rejected.
on the side with the perforation.
Fourteen of the 200 TADs were not assessed 6 DISCUSSION
months postoperatively because (1) treatment was previ- For maxillary arch retraction, extraalveolar IZC TADs
ously completed, (2) it was necessary to reposition the were preferable to interradicular miniscrews because they
TAD to avoid contact with a bracket, (3) incomplete did not interfere with tooth movement.15 2 3 12 mm

June 2022  Vol 161  Issue 6 American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Chang, Lin, and Roberts 787

Fig. 6. The mean insertion torque for IZC TADs is


inversely related to sinus penetration depth.

TADs were chosen per previous literature.13,21 However,


sinus penetration was a substantial problem for IZC Fig. 7. The mean insertion torques (gray) are shown rela-
TADs (48% of the sample). Motoyoshi et al.14 reported tive to the incidence of perforation rate (red) for patients in
no significant relationship between sinus perforation, 3 age groups. Age 20-29 y had significantly higher inser-
postoperative stability, or failure for 1.6 mm diameter tita- tion torque than patients 11-19 y (*P \0.05). Perforation
nium IR miniscrews. Jia et al21 suggested bicortical pene- rate was significantly greater for patients $30 y (62.5%)
than 20-29 y (46.6%; *P \0.05) and 11-19 y (35.7%;
tration to enhance clinical success. However, these studies
**P \0.01).
are either small in sample size or lack measurements for
stability such as insertion torque.
The stability of TADs depends on postoperative sta- However, small diameter (#2 mm) sinus wounds have
bility and long-term mechanical retention.24-26 The good healing potential,18 so antibiotics may be unneces-
relatively large (2 mm diameter) TADs in this study sary for most patients. The previous literature21 showed
have increased endosseous surface area and a higher an increase in the thickness of the sinus membrane, and
chance of penetration. It also has a much larger, more a decrease of the engaged bone was observed in postre-
diverse sample (n 5 200), with an age range of 11.0- moval CBCT images. As these radiographs are not
53.8 years. In addition, sinus perforations were far deemed as indicated for our patients, this study cannot
more prevalent in the current sample (n 5 96, 48% of provide data for the long-term effects of sinus penetra-
200 TADs). Sinus penetration reduced both the length tion by TADs. An examination of the torque 6 months
of the osseous interface and the terminal seating after insertion may also shed light on the TAD changes.
torque (Table), but it did not significantly increase the The clinician who placed all the TADs for the current
TAD failure rate (Fig 9). These data suggest that despite study is right-handed. The TADs on the right side had a
being partly compensated by bicortical stabiliza- significantly (P \0.05) increased angulation relative to
tion,19-21 the substantial loss of bony contact (31.5%) the first molar roots, which was associated with an
because of penetration still resulted in a decrease in increasing tendency for sinus perforation (Table).
insertion torque. Therefore, the evidence suggests Although sinus penetration was not significantly associ-
sinus penetration is unnecessary for enhancing primary ated with TAD failure, it is good practice to strive for a
stability. However, it does not affect its survival as more uniform, less vertical angulation on both sides to
long as there’s adequate insertion torque. help control the incidence of sinus perforation, particu-
None of the present patients reported any adverse larly when antibiotics are prescribed.
signs or symptoms of sinus perforation, which may be Decrease in insertion torque and interface bone con-
attributed to the routine use of prophylactic antibiotics. tact were associated with sinus penetration, but neither

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics June 2022  Vol 161  Issue 6
788 Chang, Lin, and Roberts

Fig. 8. Flow chart for the study shows patients excluded from survival analysis. See text for details.

Fig. 10. Failed IZC BSs (5%) had significantly lower ter-
Fig. 9. There was no significant difference in the failure minal insertion torque than BSs that survived for 6 mo
rate for sinus-perforating and nonperforating IZC BSs. (*P \0.05).

June 2022  Vol 161  Issue 6 American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Chang, Lin, and Roberts 789

outcome was related to TAD success. Three apparent AUTHOR CREDIT STATEMENT
compensating factors were bicortical stabilization,19-21 Chris H. Chang contributed to conceptualization,
age-related increase in bone quality of the posterior methodology, and manuscript review and editing; Jia-
maxilla,27 and the increased surface area of 2 mm Hong Lin contributed to original manuscript, formal
diameter TADs (Fig 2). analysis, investigation, visualization, and project admin-
Compared with previous interradicular14 and IZC28 istration; and W. Eugene Roberts contributed to super-
titanium alloy miniscrews (\1.6 mm diameter), the pre- vision and manuscript review and editing.
sent sample of 2 mm diameter SS TADs had a much
higher survival rate (95 vs \80%). Bone quality and
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
quantity at the endosseous interface are important con-
siderations, but there is no significant advantage of SS Supplementary data associated with this article can
over titanium alloy as a material for TADs.13 Despite a be found, in the online version, at https://doi.org/10.
lower torque level associated with sinus involvement 1016/j.ajodo.2021.01.028.
(Table), the bone quality and quantity at the TAD inter-
face remained adequate to resist failure (Fig 9). The REFERENCES
importance of osseous engagement at the interface for 1. Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod
TAD stability29 was further demonstrated on patients 1997;31:763-7.
with unilateral perforation. 2. Roberts WE, Marshall KJ, Mozsary PG. Rigid endosseous implant
Patients aged 19-27 years had a significantly thicker utilized as anchorage to protract molars and close an atrophic
extraction site. Angle Orthod 1990;60:135-52.
buccal plate of cortical bone in the posterior maxillary
3. Li F, Hu HK, Chen JW, Liu ZP, Li GF, He SS, et al. Comparison of
region than patients aged 13-18 years,27 which ex- anchorage capacity between implant and headgear during anterior
plains the significantly higher torque values at 20-29 segment retraction. Angle Orthod 2011;81:915-22.
years than 11-19 years. Decreased torque levels at 4. Liou EJ, Pai BC, Lin JC. Do miniscrews remain stationary under or-
$30 years were due to the increased prevalence of si- thodontic forces? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:42-7.
5. Park HS, Lee SK, Kwon OW. Group distal movement of teeth using
nus perforation (62.5%) associated with larger sinus
microscrew implant anchorage. Angle Orthod 2005;75:602-9.
volume (Fig 7). There is an age-related increase in the 6. Kuroda S, Tanaka E. Risks and complications of miniscrew
volume of the maxillary antrum that delineates the anchorage in clinical orthodontics. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 2014;50:79-85.
base of the alveolar process by about age 20 years,22,30 7. Motoyoshi M. Clinical indices for orthodontic mini-implants. J
which helps explain the increased incidence of sinus Oral Sci 2011;53:407-12.
8. Motoyoshi M, Yoshida T, Ono A, Shimizu N. Effect of cortical bone
perforation in adults. The thickness of the cortical plate
thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodon-
is related to age,27 so patients .30 years have thicker tic mini-implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:779-84.
cortices and higher quality bone (increased density)31 9. Melsen B, Costa A. Immediate loading of implants used for ortho-
at the TAD interface. Favorable osseous anatomy helps dontic anchorage. Clin Orthod Res 2000;3:23-8.
compensate for the deceased length of bone contact at 10. Park HS, Kwon TG. Sliding mechanics with microscrew implant
anchorage. Angle Orthod 2004;74:703-10.
the TAD interface and the lower torque values when the
11. Papageorgiou SN, Zogakis IP, Papadopoulos MA. Failure rates and
sinus is penetrated. The outcomes of the present study associated risk factors of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a meta-
demonstrate that sinus perforation does not compro- analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:577-95.e7.
mise the success rate for IZC TADs in adults because 12. Liou EJ, Chen PH, Wang YC, Lin JC. A computed tomographic
bone quality compensates for decreased quantity at image study on the thickness of the infrazygomatic crest of the
maxilla and its clinical implications for miniscrew insertion. Am J
the TAD interface.
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:352-6.
13. Chang CH, Lin JS, Roberts WE. Failure rates for stainless steel
CONCLUSIONS versus titanium alloy infrazygomatic crest bone screws: a single-
center, randomized double-blind clinical trial. Angle Orthod
1. The incidence of sinus perforation increases with a 2019;89:40-6.
14. Motoyoshi M, Sanuki-Suzuki R, Uchida Y, Saiki A, Shimizu N.
more upright insertion angle of an IZC TAD and in
Maxillary sinus perforation by orthodontic anchor screws. J Oral
adults aged .30 years. Sci 2015;57:95-100.
2. Terminal insertion torque and bone engagement 15. Roberts WE, Viecilli RF, Chang CH, Katona TR, Paydar NH. Biology
decrease with sinus involvement, but they are offset of biomechanics: finite element analysis of a statically determinate
by the age-related increase in bone quality that system to rotate the occlusal plane for correction of a skeletal Class
III open-bite malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;
maintains IZC TAD stability.
148:943-55.
3. Sinus perforation is an acceptable complication for 16. Laursen MG, Melsen B, Cattaneo PM. An evaluation of insertion
2 mm diameter SS TADs because it has no signifi- sites for mini-implants: a micro - CT study of human autopsy ma-
cant effect on TAD survival. terial. Angle Orthod 2013;83:222-9.

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics June 2022  Vol 161  Issue 6
790 Chang, Lin, and Roberts

17. Chang CH, Liu SS, Roberts WE. Primary failure rate for 1680 extra- 25. B€uchter A, Kleinheinz J, Wiesmann HP, Seper L, Joos U, Meyer U.
alveolar mandibular buccal shelf mini-screws placed in movable Periimplant bone formation around cylindrical and conical
mucosa or attached gingiva. Angle Orthod 2015;85:905-10. implant systems [in German]. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 2004;8:
18. Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B. Risks and complications of orthodontic min- 282-8.
iscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131(Suppl):S43-51. 26. Nienkemper M, Wilmes B, Panayotidis A, Pauls A,
19. Ardekian L, Oved-Peleg E, Mactei EE, Peled M. The clinical signif- Golubovic V, Schwarz F, et al. Measurement of mini-
icance of sinus membrane perforation during augmentation of the implant stability using resonance frequency analysis. Angle
maxillary sinus. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:277-82. Orthod 2013;83:230-8.
20. Branemark PI, Adell R, Albrektsson T, Lekholm U, Lindstr€ om J, 27. Fayed MM, Pazera P, Katsaros C. Optimal sites for orthodontic
Rockler B. An experimental and clinical study of osseointegrated mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomog-
implants penetrating the nasal cavity and maxillary sinus. J Oral raphy. Angle Orthod 2010;80:939-51.
Maxillofac Surg 1984;42:497-505. 28. Uribe F, Mehr R, Mathur A, Janakiraman N, Allareddy V. Failure
21. Jia X, Chen X, Huang X. Influence of orthodontic mini-implant rates of mini-implants placed in the infrazygomatic region. Prog
penetration of the maxillary sinus in the infrazygomatic crest re- Orthod 2015;16:31.
gion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153:656-61. 29. Miyamoto I, Tsuboi Y, Wada E, Suwa H, Iizuka T. Influence of
22. Scuderi AJ, Harnsberger HR, Boyer RS. Pneumatization of the par- cortical bone thickness and implant length on implant stability
anasal sinuses: normal features of importance to the accurate at the time of surgery—clinical, prospective, biomechanical, and
interpretation of CT scans and MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol imaging study. Bone 2005;37:776-80.
1993;160:1101-4. 30. Sharan A, Madjar D. Maxillary sinus pneumatization following ex-
23. Kim KH, Chung CH, Choy K, Lee JS, Vanarsdall RL. Effects of pre- tractions: a radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
stretching on force degradation of synthetic elastomeric chains. 2008;23:48-56.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:477-82. 31. Kim ST, Won SY, Kim SH, Paik DJ, Song WC, Koh KS, et al. Varia-
24. Wilmes B, Rademacher C, Olthoff G, Drescher D. Parameters tions in the trabecular bone ratio of the maxilla according to sex,
affecting primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. J Orofac age, and region using micro-computed tomography in Koreans. J
Orthop 2006;67:162-74. Craniofac Surg 2011;22:654-8.

June 2022  Vol 161  Issue 6 American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

You might also like