Professional Documents
Culture Documents
V. THE TROPEINES”
A. R. CUSHNY
From the Materia Medica Laboratory, University of Edinburgh
o8
07
06
or
04
03
Fio. 1. The amounts of secretion are shown along the vertical, the time along
the horizontal lines. At A injection of atropine, at P injection of 5 mgm. pilo-
carpinc. The broken line, - - - - indicates the secretion under pilocarpine alone.
The two unbroken lines that. under pilocarpine preceded by an injection of 0.1
mgm. atropine (two experiments at an interval of some months). The dotted
line the secretion under pilocarpine preceded by 0.2 mgm. atropine.
Under pilocarpine alone, the secretion reached 1.48 cc. in five minutes, but the
curve has not been drawn to this point in order to save space.
04
04
0’1
.Oi
OA 30 40 50
Fia. 2. Graphs of secretion under pilocarpine 5 mgm. (at P) after the injec-
tion at A of 0.1 mgm. atropine (-), 2.0 mgm. d-hyoscyamine (- - - -), and 3
mgm. d-hyoscyamine (. . . .) respectively.
HOMATROPINES
03
0.2. ,.............
/.: \, ,AoI*f
OS I: ‘
‘--.-R,4”q
0 10 LO 30 140 50
li t
Fio. 3. Graphs of secretion under pilocarpine 5 mgm. (at P) after the injec-
tion (at T) of 0.1 mgm. atropine (-), 3 mgm. dl-homatropine (. . . .), and
4 mgm. dl-homatropine (- - - -) respectively.
2*
04
03
01
N fp o ID
bases with the receptor is a purely chemical one and that their
pharmacological action depends on this, which would run counter
to the tendency of pharmacological thought at present, and
would be in direct opposition to previous work (5) in which I
showed that the activity of atropine depends on the law of mass
action and not on that of chemical affinity; but this would be
an erroneous dedu?tion. It is true that I assume some chem-
ical reaction to occur between the receptor and the alkaloid, but
this follows whether the 1 or the d form is present, just as in their
reaction with d camphorsulphonic acid,which combines with either
d or l-hyoscyamine indifferently. The difference in action lies
not in the facility with which the chemical combination is formed,
but in the physical characters of the resultant compound. In the
case of camphorsulphonic acid these compounds differ in solu-
bility, and some similar difference in the compound of the living
receptor and the alkaloid may explain the marked change in the
pharmacological activity which accompanies the change in sign.
0C0-OHI
3 In this list and in those following the tropeines with asymmetric carbon
are in italics and the asymmetric carbon atom is indicated by black-face type.
T indicates Tropine.
ON OPTICAL ISOMERS 115
Of
0.3
0’l.
La Jo o 50
FIG. 5. Graphs of pilocarpine secretion after the injection of 0.1 mgm. atro-
pine (-), 20 mgm. benzoyl-tropine (- - - -), and 30 mgm. benzoyl-tropine
(. . . .) respectively. The beginning and end of a pilocarpine secretion without
any tropeine are shown (xxxx).
O2
0S
, ID
‘1’ 1’ 3 4’o #{231}
Fio. 6. Graphs of pilocarpine secretion after the injection of 0.1 mgm. atropine
(-), and 30 mgm. salicyl-tropine (. . . .) respectively.
“4
#{163}0
0.4
0 2030 #{149}0
I
A7
0.6
0’S
04
03
0.t
01
#{149}1
0.7
.4
04
0’)
04.
0’l
0 1. to 30 #0 ,b
Ti 1?.
l-hyoscyamine 600
Methyl-atropine 450
Atropine 300
d-hyoscyamine 15
l-homatropine 14
dt-homatropine 10
d-homatropine 7
Phenylacetyl-T 1
Benzoyl-T 1
o-oxybenzoyl-T 1
m-oxybenzoyl-T <1
p-oxybenzoyl-T <
d-tartryl-T 0
Here the three last bases differ from homatropine only in hav-
ing Cl, NH2, or 0-CO- instead of the OH in the side chain, and
122 A. R. CUSHNY
Atropine PhCH(CH,OH)000T I
Acetyt-tropyl-T, PhCH(CH2OCOCH,)-000T..I-II Lewin and Guillery
Chlorohydratropyl-T, PhCh(CH2C1)-COOT II Lewin and Guillery
Bromohydratropyl-T, PhCH(CH2Br)-COOT II Lewin and Guillery
Atroglyceryl-T, PhCOH(CH2OH)-COOT I-Il (Dale)
Atrolactyi-T, PhCOH(CH3)-000T II (V#{246}lkers) (18)
Atropyl-T, Ph C (:CH2)-000T III (Kobert) (19)
Cinnamoyl-T, Ph CHCH-COOT Inactive (Dale)
Phenylhydroxypropionyl-T, PhCH,CHOH-COOT I (Dale)
GENERAL CONCLUSIONS
ADDENDUM
45
tilts
0’)
/
41
Fio. 10. Graphs of pilocarpine secretion after the injection of 0.1 mgm. atropine
(-), 0.1 mgm. methyl-atropine (.. . .), and 0.05 mgm. methyl-atropine (- - - -)
respectively.
and homatropine with the parent alkaloids and finds that methyl-
atropine acts about 8 times as strongly as atropine on the frog’s
vagus, twice as strongly in antagonizing piocarpine in the ex-
cised bowel and 3 to 4 times as strongly in the salivary gland;
they seem to be of equal power as mydriatics. His methods are
not very delicate, and I have therefore controlled his results on
the salivary secretion by my usual method. The sample of
methylatropine bromide used had a melting point of 222#{176}C.
and was therefore chemically pure. I found atropine 0.1 mgm.
weaker than methylatropine 0.1 mgm., but stronger than 0.05
mgm. (fig. 10). Methylatropine may thus be taken as about
1 times as powerful as atropine, each calculated as base.
REFERENCES