Zara Aleena Had Her Murder Allegedly Instigated by UK Pedophiles

By: Andrew Kaprusiak (July 4th, 2022)

A 35-year-old aspiring lawyer was murdered in the early hours of Sunday morning on
the 26th of June. Zara Aleena was walking home near Gants Hill train station in Ilford,
London when allegedly a 29-year-old male, Jordan McSweeny, approached her from
behind, brutally beat her to death and attempted to rape her. 1 No weapons were used in
the attack. The case sounds like another spontaneous attack by a psychopath on a
young woman in a London street, but is this a truly accurate appraisal of the situation?
The murder occurred close to Valentines Park in Ilford and this location was referred to
by music legend, Paul McCartney, in his concert set list at Glastonbury 2022 just 4

1 https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/19069470/zara-aleena-vigil-murder/
hours before the horrific attack on Zara. Paul McCartney’s 9th song performed at about
10:15pm UK time on the 25th of June was called Valentine. Not only does the song
Valentine tacitly forecast Zara’s death near Valentines Park but its position in the
McCartney setlist as song number 9 also partially forecasts the age of Zara’s attacker
who is 29-years-old. Furthermore, the name McSweeny is tacitly forecast as the
murderer due to Paul McCartney’s Scottish “Mc” prefix on his surname. So at least 4
hours before the attack on Zara Aleena the name of Zara’s murderer was known, as
was his age and where in London the murder would occur. All of this information was
surreptitiously forecast at the Paul McCartney concert at Glastonbury 4 hours before
Zara was murdered. Therefore, it is impossible to regard Zara’s murder as a
spontaneous/random act of violence by a psychopath.

Although Paul McCartney forecasting Zara’s death appears to be coincidental, as I have

written about on so many occasions, individuals and UK television networks have been
surreptitiously forecasting many “spontaneous” murders or “accidental” deaths of many
women which ultimately indicates that many of these deaths are not spontaneous or
accidental.2 It is simply impossible to forecast a true accident or random act, therefore,
these deaths are ultimately premeditated murders, planned well in advance. I allege that
intelligence services picks up on the planning of these premeditated acts of violence
through their routine surveillance activities and then surreptitiously passes this
information onto police, television networks, and in this case Paul McCartney. I also
allege in my writings that many of these murders and accidents are in reality instigated
by pedophiles within organized crime. Pedophiles instigate these murders towards
women as retribution for women’s efforts to alienate and legally persecute pedophiles in
contemporary society.

I have found in my research examples of pedophile propaganda in society which

surreptitiously and tacitly indicate that pedophiles are giving intentionally-caused breast
cancer to women and that pedophiles are instigating the murder of women in society.
For example, I was listening to a radio show one day in late September in 2018
broadcast from London, Ontario. I heard what I thought to be a pedophile using “double-
speak” on the airwaves. Double-speak is the Orwellian term that applies to messages
that contain two meanings, one overt message and one hidden message. We have all
experienced listening to someone talk when we think to ourselves: “Hold-on is this

2 https://www.scribd.com/search?query=andrew%20kaprusiak
person talking about what he is actually talking about? Or is he talking about something
else secretly?” I had that moment listening to this alleged pedophile talking on radio that
morning. The speaker’s overt meaning was quite benign, that of advertising a public
charity event. However, the language that he used in describing this charitable event
was so provocative that I thought he was issuing threats in a covert way during his
discussion. The subject of his covert threats were obviously women and he used these
terms verbatim in the context of talking about women: “…women…dragged away.”, “…
they all disappear…”, “We exterminated them.”, “You end up being killed off.”, “…
missing…be quiet…” As you can well imagine, hearing language such as this in the
context of an advertisement for a benign charitable event made me think that the
speaker was using classic double-speak ultimately designed to threaten women. As a
result, this pedophile speaker’s aim was not really to advertise a charity event but to
threaten London women with murder. Therefore, I became convinced that this dialogue
was evidence that pedophiles are engaged in a silent war with women in society and
that they actively do murder women covertly as retribution for women’s efforts to
alienate pedophiles from society. The alleged speaker made his tacit threat to women
on London radio at the end of September 2018. About six weeks later on November
12th, a young girl of 4, Taliyah Roberts-Nicholas, was allegedly murdered by being
administered a drug in her school in London at Aberdeen PS.3 I alleged in my article on
the subject that Taliyah was murdered in retribution for the recent 5 year imprisonment
of a particularly deranged pedophile in the London area.

In another example of pedophile propaganda —again that uses double-speak— I found

a sociological journal article that tacitly admits pedophiles are giving women
intentionally-caused breast cancer using the chemical dimethylbenz[a]anthracene in
retribution for women entering the workforce en masse (especially in police services
and the judiciary).4 The article is named: The Social Construction of the Breast
Cancer Epidemic. (Lantz & Booth, 1998)5 Although the article suggests that pedophiles
are angry with women’s entry into the workforce in general, I determined that
pedophiles were most upset with women entering police services and the judiciary in

3https://www.scribd.com/document/492457817/5-Young-Women-Allegedly-Murdered-by-
Jewish-Mafia?secret_password=Bfts9b5UnEdI32kMxHex
4 https://www.scribd.com/document/493560965/Pedophiles-tacitly-admit-they-are-causing-
the-increase-in-breast-cancer-rates-since-the-1980s-Revised-September-25-2020?
secret_password=Gia7p7vQWjkLgKi2g88O
5 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9541076/
order that they could legally prosecute pedophiles. Before the 1980s it was rare to see
women in police and the judiciary. However, due to women’s affirmative action programs
and changing societal attitudes, women began to occupy increasingly more career
positions in these areas. Also, it is obvious that since women entered the judiciary and
police professions en masse in the 1980s, that they have had a significant influence on
increasingly harsh legal consequences for pedophiles in society in the West. In my
article on how women in the police and judiciary adversely affect pedophiles,6 I quoted
some research statistics by Faust and Motivans:7

…median prison length terms increased by 100% on average for child

pornography offences between 1994 and 1998 in the United States and have
risen even further since. The number of child pornography suspects involved
in matters concluded by United States attorneys went from 200 individuals in
1994 to 600 individuals in 1998. The percentage of charged child
pornographers receiving prison terms in the United States went from about
68% in 1994 to close to 90% in 1998 and in 2007 the percent of charged
child pornographers serving prison terms was just under 100%. Child sex
trafficking suspects charged by federal prosecutors increased from about
25% to 60% between 1994 and 1998.

The statistics as analyzed by Faust and Motivans clearly indicates that: “The heightened
attention to sex offending by federal law enforcement coupled with a greater certainty of
punishment imposed has resulted in a record number of sex offenders in federal prison
and on supervision in the community. Sex offenders are also serving longer terms in
federal prison and on supervision—terms that are expected to increase further in the
next decade.”

It would be naive to regard the changes in the judiciary and in the penal system in
regards to increasing prosecutions of pedophiles since the 1980s as not having been
instigated by women. As well, in another article I wrote, I alleged that women have
historically used any new power they receive in society to immediately persecute sex

6 https://www.scribd.com/document/493560965/Pedophiles-tacitly-admit-they-are-causing-
the-increase-in-breast-cancer-rates-since-the-1980s-Revised-September-25-2020?
secret_password=Gia7p7vQWjkLgKi2g88O
7https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Sex-Offenders-in-the-Federal-Correctional-System-
Faust-Motivans/5042bdb67e1e357909b4a2fabdff986c23bd5dd6
offenders and pedophiles.8 When Elizabeth I became queen of England laws were
changed from rape being considered a clerigiable offence to a felony.9 When the
suffragettes and American women obtained the vote, they immediately began working
to increase the age-of-consent law and to strengthen rape legislation. 10 When feminists
began to occupy academic positions in universities in the 1960s and 70s they theorized
that children could not consent to sexual acts11 12 —a position held by a majority of
citizens in society now— whereas as late as the 1950s many psychologists (likely due
to pedophile subversion) determined that children instigated their sexual abuse by
acting in a flirtatious manner towards adults.13 With such a prominent history of legally
pursuing sex offenders and pedophiles women, once again, reflexively used their newly-
obtained power in the police and judiciary in the 1980s and beyond to increasingly
legally prosecute these groups. It is obvious that women’s sexual abuse that they may
have experienced throughout their lives leaves an indelible mark on their characters
which immediately manifests itself in the likelihood to lash out and legally persecute sex
offenders and pedophiles using any legal means within their grasp. Also, it is obvious
that women are aware that a great amount of violence that is directed at them is
instigated by pedophiles and their corrupt communist infrastructure in society but, for
reasons I do not understand, they do not publicly speak out about their situation.
Women must begin to publicly speak out about this situation as it would likely:

1) Cause their violent abuse at the instigation of pedophiles in society to diminish;

2) Present pedophiles with a huge financial liability in terms of reparations for crimes-
against-humanity directed at women and;

8 https://www.scribd.com/document/493560965/Pedophiles-tacitly-admit-they-are-causing-
the-increase-in-breast-cancer-rates-since-the-1980s-Revised-September-25-2020?
secret_password=Gia7p7vQWjkLgKi2g88O
9 https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?
referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1965&context=ohlj
10https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/what-raising-age-sexual-consent-taught-women-
about-vote-180975658/
11https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
31403920_Feminism_Child_Sexual_Abuse_and_the_Erasure_of_Child_Sexuality
12 https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674002708
13 https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781003287865/vulnerable-children-
lindy-burton?refId=cbcf81c1-a0c9-4c3e-afc8-304b30f21988&context=ubx
3) Position women to be able to request that pedophiles be segregated from regular
society in order to halt the longest, most on-going genocide in the history of
humanity.


It is obvious that women and pedophiles have been at odds throughout human history
and that they represent the most serious threat to each others safety and well-being.
Pedophiles have women murdered and subjected to horrific acts of violence, yet make
these acts appear as accidental or spontaneous, whereas women threaten the very
freedom of pedophiles and are actively seeking to alienate and cut pedophiles off from
society. As such, it would be utterly ridiculous not to assume that pedophiles are
attacking women, using covert methods of persecution, in order to bring retribution upon
them for trying to ostracize pedophiles from society. As a result, pedophiles use
communist infrastructure in society (the source of corruption in our society) to perpetrate
massive numbers of violent acts and murders towards women. And Zara Aleena is
typical of the women pedophiles target in society for murder and violence, women who
represent the greatest threat towards them. Not only was Zara exceptionally physically
attractive, she was well-educated, good-natured and intelligent. These characteristics
are enough to put any woman on the “death list” of pedophiles, however Zara had an
even more threatening characteristic in the eyes of pedophiles, she was on a fast track
to a high-level position in the judiciary in the UK. Zara was a law student beginning to
work in her chosen profession. With all Zara had going for her she was assured to
become a judge eventually and, doubtlessly, she would have put a lot of pedophiles in
prison. I allege that her career in the judiciary ultimately condemned Zara to a brutal
death at the instigation of pedophiles.

But then how did UK pedophiles get McSweeny to agree to murder this female knowing
full-well that he would be caught and likely spend the rest of his life in prison for this
murder? Everything can be negotiated, even coercing someone to murder then
subsequently spend the rest of their life in prison. McSweeny may have committed other
murders and organized crime may have used their knowledge of these murders as
leverage to get McSweeny to commit one more. McSweeny is also likely an opioid
addict and organized crime agreed to provide him with a life-times supply of opioids in
prison if he murdered Zara. Such is the stress and pain-reducing characteristics of
opioid drugs that an addict would consider life in prison with a lifetime supply of opioid
drugs, to blot out his predicament, more agreeable than spending his life on the outside
constantly hustling and committing crimes in order to obtain these drugs. Isn’t a long
prison term with a lifetime supply of opioid drugs not that far from the tales we heard of
individuals spending decades in Chinese-run opium dens at the turn of the 20th
century? These opioid drugs —as we have seen on so many other occasions— can
cause an individual to commit any degrading or illegal act in order to obtain them. So its
easy to understand why an individual would commit a murder and face imprisonment in
order to obtain a lifetime supply of them. I believe that organized crime giving individuals
large supplies of opioid drugs is the major motivator in having individuals commit these
horrific murders and acts of violence towards women. It is the only possible reason I can
see for motivating individuals to commit these murders knowing full-well that they will be
caught and legally prosecuted for these acts of violence.

I must mention, as well, that UK television implied that 23-year-old Sophie Madden was
covertly murdered as well. Sophie was a soldier at the Overhill Training Centre at St
Martin's Plain Camp near Folkestone, UK. She was found at the site allegedly hanged
on June 10, 2022.14 UK television alleges that Sophie became aware of a communist
spy within the army base and was ultimately murdered to silence her in these regards.
Her death was made to appear as a suicide in order to hide the fact that communists
actually had her killed. Nevertheless, we have yet another woman on a high-level career
trajectory allegedly murdered by UK pedophiles using their corrupt communist
infrastructure in society. If our society is ever to halt this genocide that communists are
perpetrating towards women in society and to repair our utterly corrupted social
institutions, (as well as to have these institutions function in the public’s interest not in
the interests of communists and organized criminals), pedophiles must be segregated
from society and high-level communists must be fired from their positions of
employment in society. These are the only means which will succeed in dismantling
communist infrastructure in society.

14 https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/19004288/soldier-found-hanged-army-base-folkestone/