Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Erong
Course/Year: BEED-II
Lesson 2
Experience
In Piaget’s four stages of cognitive development, students in the primary grades fall under the
second stage – the preoperational stage. Children in this stage begin to think symbolically as they use
words and pictures to represent real objects. However, they still tend to think about concepts in very
concrete manner.
Now study the curriculum of Grades 1 to 3. Do you think the mentioned cognitive characteristics
of children in the preoperational stage were considered in the content standards of Grades 1 to 3
mathematics? Explain your thoughts.
After reviewing the curriculum, I believe that some of the previously identified cognitive qualities of
children in the pre-operational stage were taken into account in the subject standards for grades 1
through 3. Because the pre-operational stage lasts from two to seven years, children in first grade still
think and learn symbolically. However, because of the cognitive qualities of grades 2 and 3, children are
required to perform an operation that falls under the third stage, the Operational Stage. However, I
believe that teachers teaching mathematics in primary and even lower secondary schools use symbols
or pictures to help students visualize or picture what the teachers are saying so that they can better
understand the topics.Furthermore, our curriculum is designed in a spiral format, which means that the
content is the same at each year level but with varying degrees of difficulty, just as children develop
each year and are able to adapt and learn according to their age and readiness.
Assess
A lot of teachers in the field are confused about the difference between content standards,
performance standards, and learning competencies. It is important that you understand them and their
importance as they serve as the skeleton of the mathematics curriculum.
In your own understanding, explain the differences between content standards, performance
standards, and learning competencies. What is the importance of each?
Content standards, in my opinion, contain specific information about what should be taught or learned
by students. The value of a content standard is that it gives teachers a clear direction in how to design
their instruction for the learners. Performance standards, on the other hand, give meaning to content
standards by demonstrating what students have learned. This sets clear expectations for what students
should be able to do after learning the concepts. Finally, learning competences are the precise
information and abilities that learners should possess at the conclusion of the talk. This instructs
teachers on how to achieve the intended outcome while simultaneously meeting the relevant content
and performance standards.
Challenge
We can truly comprehend our own curriculum when we get a clear picture of other’s curricula.
This is the context of comparative studies in education. The following activity will challenge you to study
other countries’ curricula in order to better understand the Philippines’ mathematics curriculum.
Read about the mathematics curriculum of the Philippines, Singapore, and United States.
Compare and contrast the curricula of the three countries in terms of the five content areas.
Harness
In every math lesson, the teacher must keep three things in mind – (1) what is to be learned, (2)
where the students are coming from, and (3) where the students are going with what they will learn.
The following activity will help you develop the skill of mapping every competency you teach.
Choose three learning competencies in Grade 2. In each competency, find the prerequisite
competencies in Grade 1 and the competencies in Grade 3 wherein your chosen Grade 2 competency is
a prerequisite of.
Lesson 3
Answer the following questions to verbalize your understanding of the constructivist learning theory.
1. What is the constructivist theory? Explain it in your own words.
Students used their prior knowledge or experiences to connect or construct new ideas with the help of
teachers in constructivist theory. It enables students to create meaning or create their own words in
order to better comprehend the lesson.
I believe that constructivist theory can be used to teach mathematics in such a way that teachers can
allow students to explore the topic on their own, discover new information, and solve problems.
Teachers can designate one representative to explain their work to them. The students not only
demonstrated or used logical or problem-solving skills in this case, but they also assisted their peers
while working in a group. They share their knowledge, collaborate, or brainstorm on what's best for
their task to be right and completed on time, keeping students engaged in the activity while teachers
serve as facilitators.
Challenge
How well do you understand the constructivist learning theory? Consider the following scenarios
and the question that follow.
Scenario 1
"Four glasses of water will fill this pitcher," a teacher told the children.
Scenario 2
A instructor hands out a glass and instructs the students to pour water into the pitcher.
They're figuring out how much water they'll need to fill the pitcher.
In which scenario do you think will the students learn better? Why do you think so?
The students learn better in scenario 2. The moment the teacher lets the children pour the
water into the pitcher is where the learning occurs. The students are engaged in the activity. They are
learning by doing the task and constructing knowledge by experience.