Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PRAGMATISM
by: Gladys G. Astronomo
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
Definition
Pragmatism derives from a Greek word “Pragma” which means “action”. It is the
philosophy of practical experience. Pragmatism is an educational philosophy that that
says education should be teaching students the things that are practical for life and
encourages them to grow into a better people. The idea that beliefs are identified with
the actions of a believer and the truth of beliefs with success of those actions in
securing a believer’s goals: the doctrine that ideas must be looked at in terms of their
practical effects and consequences. According to pragmatism, the truth or meaning of
an idea or a proposition lies in its observable practical consequences rather than
anything metaphysical. It can be summarized by the phrase whatever works, is likely
true. Because reality changes, whatever work will also change - thus, truth must also be
changeable and no one can claim to possess any final or ultimate truth. In other word,
pragmatism is the philosophy that encourages us to seek out the processes and do
things that work best to help us achieve desirable ends ( Ozmon and Craver, 2008).
Pragmatism originates with Charles Sanders Pierce, William James and John
Dewey. Originally developed by Charles Sanders Peirce, pragmatism was expanded
upon and spread by the writings of William James and John Dewey. As a philosophy,
pragmatism holds that the function of human thought can be used for prediction,
action, creativity and problem solving, rather than just mirroring reality. Pragmatism is a
principle of inquiry and an account of meaning first proposed by C. S. Peirce in the
1870s. The crux of Peirce’s pragmatism is that for any statement to be meaningful, it
must have practical bearings. Peirce saw the pragmatic account of meaning as a
method for clearing up metaphysics and aiding scientific inquiry. This has led many to
take Peirce’s early statement of pragmatism as a forerunner of the verifications account
of meaning championed by logical positivists. The early pragmatism of C.S. Peirce
developed through the work of James and Dewey in the U. S. A, and F. C. S. Schiller in
Great Britain. Peirce, however, remained unhappy with both his early formulations and
the developments made by fellow pragmatists. This lead him, in later life, to refine his
own earlier account and rename it “pragmatisms” in order to distinguish it from other
more “nominalist” versions.
Philosophy Of Education 1
EDUC Pragmatism
Pragmatism by William James
In 1878, Charles Sanders Peirce came up with the
“pragmatic maxim,” which asks the individual to
consider the effects that might have practical
bearing on how the individual conceives an object.
The conception of the effects is the same as the
conception of the object. Peirce held that inquiry
began with real doubt, becoming a method of
experimental mental reflection.
Philosophy Of Education 2
EDUC Pragmatism
virtually all of the main areas of philosophical concern in his day. He also wrote
extensively on social issues in such popular publications as the New Republic, thereby
gaining a reputation as a leading social commentator of his time.
FORMS OF PRAGMATISM
Philosophy Of Education 3
EDUC Pragmatism
PRINCIPLES OF PRAGMATISM
UTILITARIANISM- Pragmatists are utility is the test of all truth and reality. A
useful principle is true. Utility means fulfillment of human purposes.
CHANGING AIM AND VALUES - The aim and values of life change in
different times and climes. The old aims and values, therefore, cannot be
accepted as they are. Human life and the world is a laboratory in which the
aims and values are developed.
Philosophy Of Education 4
EDUC Pragmatism
EMPHASIS ON SOCIAL ASPECTS - Since man is a social animal therefore,
he develops in social circumstances. His success is success in society.The
aim of education is to make him successful by developing his social
personality.
Philosophy Of Education 5
EDUC Pragmatism
PRINCIPLE OF INTEGRATION - Pragmatic curriculum deals with the
integration of subjects and activities. According to pragmatism knowledge is
one unit. Pragmatists want to construct flexible, dynamic and integrated
curriculum which aids the developing child and the changing society more
and more as the needs, demands and situation require.
Philosophy Of Education 6
EDUC Pragmatism
Philosophy Of Education 7
EDUC Pragmatism
DISCIPLINE
To utilize the interest of the pupil is the basis of discipline here. The teacher
and pupils attack a problem jointly. Teacher’s role is that of a guide and a
director; it is the pupil who acts, learning this becomes a cooperative venture-
a joint enterprise. Pursuit of common purposes enforces it own order.
Education becomes a social process of sharing between the members of the
various groups and all are equal partners in the process. That is no rewards
also there are no placing for the martinet so any punishments. The discipline
proceeds from the life of the school as a whole.
Philosophy Of Education 8
EDUC Pragmatism
Conclusion
The student-centered curriculum calls for team teaching and courses
offered by different departments. Projects and hands-on experiences have
definite advantages over lectures. According to pragmatists, this
methodology focuses on giving students a great deal of autonomy as well as
alternatives to their current learning circumstances. The learning environment
turns into a methodical laboratory in which thoughts are experienced to
determine whether they can be authenticated. Pragmatic philosophy is a
practical philosophy, having no fixed or absolute standards. Man always
creates new values and education should help him in doing so. Being
practical and utilitarian school of philosophy, pragmatism has influenced
education to the maximum extent. It has tried overcoming the limitations of
other schools like idealism and naturalism and has influenced world in a
great deal.
References
Alexander, T. (1987). John Dewey’s theory of art, experience, and nature.
SUNY Press
Bohac, P., (2001, February 6). Dewey's pragmatism. Chapter 4 Pragmatism
and
Ozmon, H.A. & Craver, S.M. (2008). Philosophical foundations of education
(8th ed.). Columbus, Ohio: Prentice- Hall Inc.
Welchman, J. (1995). Dewey’s ethical thought. Ithaca: Cornell University
Press.
Philosophy Of Education 9