Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Determination of The Molecular Weight
Determination of The Molecular Weight
3Xethods for the determination of the molecular weight of nylons are described.
The active end groups of alcohol-soluble nylona are determined either potentio-
metrically or conductometrically. The amine end groups of alcohol-insoluble,
phenol-soluble nylons may be determined by conductometric titration in the
solvent phenol-alcohol-water. Carboxyl end groups of the latter nylons are de-
termined by dissolting the polymer in benzyl alcohol at 175’ C. and titrating
H ith potassium hydroxide, using phenolphthalein as indicator.
nuintitar average molecular w i g h t is 2/(78 X 10-8) or 25,600 metrically measures all carboxyl in tht. polymer. Similarly, addi-
grams per mole. tion of hydrochloric acid solution suppressrs ionization of the
Two objections may be raised to this method of determining --COO- ends, a n d the amine ends are quantitatively determined
molecular weight-viz., (1) the procedure does not distinguish a t p H 4.5. If this is true, tht, distance t)titnec,n the two breaks on
hetxeen terminal acidic and basic groups and any other acid or bast. the carboxyl side should be a fair nitlasure of the number of amine
in the sample, and (2) all molecules are assunicd t o tsrniinate in ends. Examination of all curvt's showing two wll-defined
aridir or basic groups. Since a t present, no othrr method of sui- hreaks shoived that such \vas the case.
fic.ient accuracy for determining niolecular \wight has becxn &%- Solubility Class 11. The application of a similar method to
velopecl, t,hese objections cannot' be wholly met. Hoivever, thew the determination of the molrcular weight of the nylons in Class
is good reproducibility of titrations among samples from a sin&, I1 deprnded upon finding a suitable solvent. Aitypical nylon
lilend of polymer, and a linear relatioriship was found to exist b ( 3 - in Class I1 is 66 (polyhexamethylene adipamide), which may have
t i w r n molecular weight determined by this method and the log- added to it some monofunctional group, such as acetic acid, as a
arithm of the relative viscosity of the polymer solution.*. (Vis- inolwular w i g h t stabilizer. Since no evidence of loss of acetic
cosity determined with a pipet-style viscometer a t a conwntration acid during polymerization has been found, it is assumed that
of 8.4c; in 9 0 5 aqueous formic acid. Such concentrated solu- the number of acetylated amine rnds in the polymer can be esti-
tions were used to take advantage of their grc,atclr sensitivity to mated satisfactorily by the amount of acid addc,d before poly-
molpcular weight changes.) T t n ~ ~ uthus l d s w m likely that t h t w merization. Thus only terminal amino a n d carboxyl groups
IvtAight., .
:I r~ t rui' inolt~t*ulxr need be determined by titration.
Several solvents for 66 nylon arr acidic in reaction and might
permit, a sudden increase of hydrogen-ion roncrntration a t the
equivalence point of the amine end-group titration, but the most
satisfactory solvent which is not highly acidic is phenol. It was
desired, although not rrquirrd, to dilutc. the solvent phenol con-
siderably before titration, SO as t o provide less chance for am-
'
biguity in t,he interpretation of the titration c u r v c s T o this end,
it was found that if 2 grams of polymer ~ v e r etiissolvrd in 50 ml. of
885, phenol, the polymer was retained in a single-phase solution
upon additiop of 25 ml. of 957( ethanol and 25 ml. of water. Com-
mercially available phenol contains a n acid impurity which can
be removed by treating with potassium cxrhonatt. anti sutisequent
distillation.
Curve B in Figure 4 shows the titration of 100 nil. of a purified
phenol-alcohol-water solution with 0.1 .Y hydrochloric acid solu-
t,ion. Curve A in Figure 4 shows the same titration when the
solution contains 2.00 grams of a 66 nylon polymcr. T h e equiva-