Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Enzymes – regulation
---
Feedback inhibition
- Bind phosphate
- Muscles: Epinephrine (adrenaline)
2
o Retinal
Activation
“Partner” molecules
Phosphorylation
Allosteric regulation
Inhibition
Competitive
- Active feedback inhibition -product of reaction will compete for the active site and bind,
prevent for other reactants to bind and proceeding with the reaction.
Non-competitive
- Passive feedback inhibition – product bind to allosteric site, switch it off
- Allosteric
- Phosphorylation
--------
ENZYME INHIBITION
Enzyme inhibition
Enzyme activity can be inhibited. Enzyme inhibitors can be classified according to three different
mechanisms:
- irreversible inhibitors
- competitive inhibitors
- non-competitive inhibitors.
Agents that bind covalently to enzymes and disrupt their function are irreversible inhibitors. A few do
bind non-covalently, and they are highly toxic.
Competitive inhibitors
Compete with the substrate for the active site by binding reversibly with non-covalent bonds at the
active site. They block the substrate from binding to the active site, and forming the enzyme-substrate
complex. A comparative inhibitor will increase the Km, but the Vmax does not change. The inhibition can
3
be overcome by adding more substrate. The classic indication that something is a competitive inhibitor
is that the Vmax is the same.
E+S = ES E+P
||
EI
Non-Competitive Inhibitors
Bind non-covalently to a site other than the active site and change the conformation of the enzyme.
They do not prevent the substrate from binding to the enzyme. Unlike competitive inhibitors, they
cannot be overcome by the addition of substrate. The non-competitive inhibitor will also lower the
Vmax due to inability of the reaction to proceed as efficiently. They do not lower the enzymes for the
substrate, so the Km remains the same.
Uncompetitive Inhibition
The inhibitor binds only to the enzyme-substrate complex. This type of inhibition decreases the Vmax
due to less availability of the active complex. The Km will decrease due to better binding efficiently.
--------
Competitive
Noncompetitive
4
Higher Km, lower affinity
---
Enzymes
- Catalyst, faster
- Proteins, made up amino acids
- Substrate to active site (specificity)
- Enzyme-substrate complex
- Induced fit model
- Optimal range and temperature
- Inhibitors: competitive and non-competitive
--
Reversible
-Competitive
5
Adding more substrate can add to the probability that it will bind
-Non-competitive
6
7
8
Lac Operons
Lac operon – a well – understood operon codes for B-galactosidase to break down lactose in E-coli.
Lactose
9
Repressor -diff conformation and change shape, unable to repress
Free to move
Gene control
8min
Jacob-monod model
Based on your results, what can you conclude about the affinity of the substrate, H2O2?
According to the results in Lineweaver-Burke Plot, Enzyme B will more likely bind to the substrate H202
than Enzyme A. It is due to the Km value being lower in Enzyme B, specifically with the value of 1.28,
than the Km in Enzyme A, with 3.11. With this, the lower Km value indicates higher affinity. Moreover,
the Vmax value of Enzyme B is lower with 0.36, indicating a slower second step compared to Enzyme A
which has the Vmax value of 1.29, since more time and therefore energy is needed to cleave the non-
covalent enzyme-substrate complex.
Of enzymatic activity
since more time and therefore energy is needed to cleave the non-covalent enzyme-substrate complex.
Of enzymatic activity
10
11