LOTTE LINE PROJECT WIKA BETON; Pile: WP1 - T4 Restrike; Spun 50CM Diesel 5.

5T; Blow: 15 (Test: 19-Apr-2022 10:04:) 20-Apr-2022

Megah Adhi Karya CAPWAP(R) 2014-3

500 500
Force Msd Force Msd
tons tons
Force Cpt Velocity Msd

250 250

5 205 ms 5 205 ms
0 0
23 2L/c 23 2L/c

-250 -250

20
Shaft Resistance Length b. Sensors 12.8 m
Load (tons) Distribution Embedment 11.3 m
Pile Top
Top Area 1159.2 cm2
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Bottom 15
0.0 End Bearing Area 1963.5 cm2
Top Perimeter 1.57 m

tons/m
Top E-Modulus 352 tons/cm2
10 Top Spec. Weight 2.4 tons/m3
RU = 446 tons Top Wave Spd. 3788 m/s
SF = 107 tons Overall W.S. 3788 m/s
5.0 5
EB = 339 tons
Displacement (mm)

Dy = 14.522 mm Match Quality 1.99

Dx = 14.618 mm Top Compr. Stress 0.4 tons/cm2
0 Max Compr. Stress 0.4 tons/cm2
SET/Bl = 0.100 mm
0 Max Tension Stress -0.09 tons/cm2
10.0
110 Avg. Shaft Quake 0.925 mm
EB Toe Quake 1.236 mm
220 Avg. Shaft Smith Dpg. 0.64 s/m
tons

Toe Smith Damping 0.93 s/m

15.0
330
SF
440
Pile Force
20.0 at Ru
550

CAPWAP(R) 2014-3 Licensed to Megah Adhi Karya

LOTTE LINE PROJECT WIKA BETON; Pile: WP1 - T4 Restrike Test: 19-Apr-2022 10:04
Spun 50CM Diesel 5.5T; Blow: 15 CAPWAP(R) 2014-3
Megah Adhi Karya OP: Marcho
About the CAPWAP Results

The CAPWAP program performs a signal matching or reverse analysis based on

measurements taken on a deep foundation under an impact load. The program is based
on a one-dimensional mathematical model. Under certain conditions, the model only
crudely approximates the often complex dynamic situations.
The CAPWAP analysis relies on the input of accurately measured dynamic data plus
additional parameters describing pile and soil behavior. If the field measurements
of force and velocity are incorrect or were taken under inappropriate conditions
(e.g., at an inappropriate time or with too much or too little energy) or if the
input pile model is incorrect, then the solution cannot represent the actual
soil behavior.
Generally the CAPWAP analysis is used to estimate the axial compressive pile
capacity and the soil resistance distribution. The long-term capacity is best
evaluated with restrike tests since they incorporate soil strength changes
(set-up gains or relaxation losses) that occur after installation. The calculated
load settlement graph does not consider creep or long term consolidation settlements.
When uplift is a controlling factor in the design, use of the CAPWAP results to assess
uplift capacity should be made only after very careful analysis of only good
measurement quality, and further used only with longer pile lengths and with nominally
higher safety factors.
CAPWAP is also used to evaluate driving stresses along the length of the pile.
However, it should be understood that the analysis is one dimensional and does not
take into account bending effects or local contact stresses at the pile toe.
Furthermore, if the user of this software was not able to produce a solution with
satisfactory signal “match quality” (MQ), then the associated CAPWAP results may be
unreliable. There is no absolute scale for solution acceptability but solutions with
MQ above 5 are generally considered less reliable than those with lower MQ values and
every effort should be made to improve the analysis, for example, by getting help
from other independent experts.
Considering the CAPWAP model limitations, the nature of the input parameters,
the complexity of the analysis procedure, and the need for a responsible application
of the results to actual construction projects, it is recommended that at least one
static load test be performed on sites where little experience exists with dynamic
behavior of the soil resistance or when the experience of the analyzing engineer with
both program use and result application is limited.
Finally, the CAPWAP capacities are ultimate values. They MUST be reduced by means
of an appropriate factor of safety to yield a design or working load. The selection
of a factor of safety should consider the quality of the construction control,
the variability of the site conditions, uncertainties in the loads, the importance
of structure and other factors. The CAPWAP results should be reviewed by the Engineer
of Record with consideration of applicable geotechnical conditions including, but not
limited to, group effects, potential settlement from underlying compressible layers,
soil resistances provided from any layers unsuitable for long term support,
as well as effective stress changes due to soil surcharges, excavation or change
in water table elevation.
The CAPWAP analysis software is one of many means by which the capacity of a deep
foundation can be assessed. The engineer performing the analysis is responsible for
proper software application and the analysis results. Pile Dynamics accepts
no liability whatsoever of any kind for the analysis solution and/or the application
of the analysis result.
Analysis: 20-Apr-2022
LOTTE LINE PROJECT WIKA BETON; Pile: WP1 - T4 Restrike Test: 19-Apr-2022 10:04
Spun 50CM Diesel 5.5T; Blow: 15 CAPWAP(R) 2014-3
Megah Adhi Karya OP: Marcho
CAPWAP SUMMARY RESULTS
Total CAPWAP Capacity: 446.14; along Shaft 107.30; at Toe 338.84 tons
Soil Dist. Depth Ru Force Sum Unit Unit Quake
Sgmnt Below Below in Pile of Resist. Resist.
No. Gages Grade Ru (Depth) (Area)
m m tons tons tons tons/m tons/m2 mm

446.1
1 4.3 2.8 16.33 429.8 16.33 5.90 3.76 1.000
2 6.4 4.9 20.70 409.1 37.03 9.70 6.18 1.000
3 8.5 7.0 28.85 380.3 65.88 13.52 8.61 1.000
4 10.7 9.2 25.01 355.3 90.89 11.72 7.46 1.000
5 12.8 11.3 16.41 338.8 107.30 7.69 4.90 0.507

Avg. Shaft 21.46 9.50 6.05 0.925

Toe 338.84 1725.70 1.236

Soil Model Parameters/Extensions Shaft Toe

Smith Damping Factor 0.64 0.93
Case Damping Factor 0.64 2.92
Damping Type Viscous Sm+Visc
Unloading Quake (% of loading quake) 100 126
Reloading Level (% of Ru) 100 100
Unloading Level (% of Ru) 0
Resistance Gap (included in Toe Quake) (mm) 0.197

CAPWAP match quality = 1.99 (Wave Up Match) ; RSA = 0

Observed: Final Set = 0.100 mm; Blow Count = 10000 b/m
Computed: Final Set = 0.100 mm; Blow Count = 9999 b/m
Transducer F3 (U586) CAL: 144.3; RF: 1.00; F4 (B588) CAL: 146.5; RF: 1.00
A1 (K5926) CAL: 382; RF: 1.00; A2 (K5927) CAL: 368; RF: 1.00

max. Top Comp. Stress = 0.4 tons/cm2 (T= 50.4 ms, max= 1.026 x Top)
max. Comp. Stress = 0.4 tons/cm2 (Z= 4.3 m, T= 50.4 ms)
max. Tens. Stress = -0.09 tons/cm2 (Z= 6.4 m, T= 76.3 ms)
max. Energy (EMX) = 2.97 tons-m; max. Measured Top Displ. (DMX)=13.073 mm

Page 2 Analysis: 20-Apr-2022

LOTTE LINE PROJECT WIKA BETON; Pile: WP1 - T4 Restrike Test: 19-Apr-2022 10:04
Spun 50CM Diesel 5.5T; Blow: 15 CAPWAP(R) 2014-3
Megah Adhi Karya OP: Marcho
EXTREMA TABLE
Pile Dist. max. min. max. max. max. max. max.
Sgmnt Below Force Force Comp. Tens. Trnsfd. Veloc. Displ.
No. Gages Stress Stress Energy
m tons tons tons/cm2 tons/cm2 tons-m m/s mm
1 1.1 411.6 -95.2 0.4 -0.08 2.97 1.0 12.604
2 2.1 415.8 -97.6 0.4 -0.08 2.76 0.9 11.542
3 3.2 419.6 -98.7 0.4 -0.09 2.54 0.9 10.463
4 4.3 422.3 -100.3 0.4 -0.09 2.32 0.8 9.373
5 5.3 405.6 -99.0 0.3 -0.09 1.92 0.7 8.309
6 6.4 408.7 -100.4 0.4 -0.09 1.70 0.7 7.229
7 7.5 392.9 -97.2 0.3 -0.08 1.33 0.6 6.188
8 8.5 397.3 -97.8 0.3 -0.08 1.13 0.5 5.134
9 9.6 374.2 -93.2 0.3 -0.08 0.79 0.4 4.139
10 10.7 377.6 -94.0 0.3 -0.08 0.60 0.3 3.136
11 11.7 356.3 -89.9 0.3 -0.08 0.38 0.2 2.188
12 12.8 357.9 -90.3 0.3 -0.08 0.37 0.1 1.238
Absolute 4.3 0.4 (T = 50.4 ms)
6.4 -0.09 (T = 76.3 ms)

CASE METHOD
J = 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
RP 377 375 373 372 370 368 366 364 362 361
RX 437 435 432 430 428 426 424 422 420 419
RU 377 375 373 372 370 368 366 364 362 361
RAU = 392 (tons); RA2 = 377 (tons)

Current CAPWAP Ru = 446 (tons); Corresponding J(RP)= 0.00; J(RX) = 0.00

VMX TVP VT1*Z FT1 FMX DMX DFN SET EMX QUS KEB
m/s ms tons tons tons mm mm mm tons-m tons tons/mm
1.1 43.09 114 282 407 13.073 0.099 0.100 3.16 480 326

PILE PROFILE AND PILE MODEL

Depth Area E-Modulus Spec. Weight Perim.
m cm2 tons/cm2 tons/m3 m
0.0 1159.2 351.5 2.403 1.57
12.8 1159.2 351.5 2.403 1.57
Toe Area 1963.5 cm2
Top Segment Length 1.07 m, Top Impedance 108 tons/m/s
Wave Speed: Pile Top 3787.8, Elastic 3787.8, Overall 3787.8 m/s
Pile Damping 2.00 %, Time Incr 0.282 ms, 2L/c 6.8 ms
Total volume: 1.484 m3; Volume ratio considering added impedance: 1.000

Page 3 Analysis: 20-Apr-2022