TEM Guidebook on Revised Professional Interview Process
Copyright Protection
All rights reserved. No part of this Guidebook may be reproduced, distributed or
transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or
by other electronic and mechanic methods, or by any information storage and
retrieval system, without prior written permission of the Institution of Engineers,
Malaysia (IEM).u I
; » THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS. MALAYSIA
IEM GUIDE BOOK ON REVISED PI PROCESS
Contents
Preface
Glossary
Tab1 PI/ MIEM Registration Process and Stages
Tab 2 List of Documentation
Tab3 Competency Model
Tab 4 — Application Stage — PI Applicant
Tab 5 Application Documentation Check -- Secretariat
Tab 6 — Eligibility Assessment Stage ~ Assessors & Membership Application Board
Tab7 — Guidelines to Candidate ~ PI Candidate
Tab & Professional Interview Stage — Interviewers and Professional Interview Board
Tab9 — Sector GuidanceTHE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALA
In 2014, JEM embarked on revising existing Professional Interview (PI) Process and Practice
‘as part of periodic review to improve quality. The objectives of this revision include:
+ Establishing a competency-based Professional Interview by benchmarking @ well-
established outcome-based competence standard.
* Developing rubrics with common yardsticks for rating PI Candidate in order to minimize
subjectivity of assessment in both the oral interview and the written papers.
+ Revising current PI process with related documentation to support the above-mentioned.
In benchmarking an outcome-based competence standard, IEM has opted to adopt and adapt:
The United Kingdom Standard for Professional Er
jineering Competence (UK-SPEC) for
Chartered Engineers mainly for the oral interview.
* The Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) Model which is more generic and
readily applicable to almost all engineering disciplines since IEM is the Institution that
caters for all engineering disciplines.
The revised version retains the main structure of existing PI Process in that it consists of two
essential parts, namely the documentary review and professional interview; and the
professional interview is made up of oral interview and essay writing. The endeavor has
resulted in this IEM Guidebook for the Revised Professional Interview Process.
IEM Professional Interview is governed by the IEM Regulations on Professional Interview.
‘This IEM Guidebook on Revised Professional Interview Process forms a part of the PI
Regulations,
As with all live system, this Revised Professional Interview Process will undergo periodic
review and changes in the continuous effort to enhance its quality and keep up with the most
up-to-date development in professional engineering competence assessment.Glossary
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
‘Terms (Acronyms)
Defini
jon / Description
Appeal
‘A formal request by a PI Candidate who is unsuccessful in the
Professional Interview to review the decision of the Institution of
Engineers, Malaysia.
‘Competency
The ability to carry out a task to an effective standard, of which the
achievement requires the necessary level of knowledge,
understanding and skill, as well as a professional attitude. It is part of
the requirement that must be demonstrated in order for an Applicant
to be admitted as a Corporate Member of IEM. The formation
process of professional competence generally involves a combination
of formal education and practical training and experience.
Competency Category
‘A group of Competency Elements that are classified under a broad
area of professional competency required for the assessment in
Professional Interview.
Competency Element
‘A component of Competency Category that describes a specific area
of professional competency against which the PI Candidate is
assessed for his level of attainment based on a specific set of standard
citer
Continuing Professional
Development (CPD)
‘The systematic acquisition of knowledge and skills as well as the
development of personal qualities in order to maintain and enhance
professional competence.
Corporate Member of
IEM (MIEM)
A practicing engineer who has satisfied the [EM Council that he has
attained the standard that testifies his competency as professional
engincer, and that he is worthy of election as a Corporate Member of
IEM in accordance with the relevant Bylaws and Regulations
Exemplifying
Qualification
‘An educational qualification that demonstrates the knowledge,
understanding and skills to meet the requirement for admission as
TEM Graduate Member or BEM Graduate Engineer. It generally
refers to the engineering degree programme that has been accredited
by the Signatories to the Washington Accord.
Eligibility Assessor
A suitably qualified, experienced and trained Corporate Member of
TEM who is assigned by the Membership Application Board to assess
the application to determine if the PI Applicant is eligible and ready
to sit for the Professional Interview,THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
Membership Application
“The Sub Committee that vets and processes application for all grades
of IEM Membership. It reports to the Admission and Practical
Board (MAB) Training Standing Committee.
Paarl ‘The process by which an individual gains professional competence. It
ee may take place through formal and informal learning, and workplace
Development
training and experience.
Professional Engineer
(PE)
The professional title given to engineers who meet the standard of
competence required by the Board of Engineer Malaysia for
registration as a professional engineer under subsection 10(2) of the
Registration of Engineers Act 1967. Becoming a MIEM satisfies one
of the main pre-requites.
Professional Interview
eb
'A peer interview conducted by two PI Interviewers to assess a PI
Candidate to find out or decide whether the Candidate has met the
‘competency requirements to be registered as a MIEM.
‘A person who applies to sit for the Professional Interview after
having gained an accredited engineering degree and subsequently
PI Applicant accumulated a minimum of three years of practical training and
experience as an engineer.
‘A person who has been vetted and confirmed by the Eligibility
PI Candidate. ‘Assessors to be eligible and ready to sit for the Professional
Interview.
PI Interviewer
‘A suitably qualified, trained and experienced Corporate Member of
TEM who is assigned by the Professional Interview Board to conduct
Professional Interview for PI Candidate.
Professional Interview
Board (PIB)
‘The Sub Committee that manages the overall process of Professional
Interview. It reports to the Examination and Qualification Standing,
Committee.
PI Reviewer
‘A senior PI Interviewer who is assigned by the Professional Interview,
Board to review the result of Professional Interview that has been
conducted.
PI Supporter
‘A Professional Engineer registered with the BEM, or a Corporate
Member of the IEM who know the PI Applicant well and is
convinced, through personal experience, that the Applicant is suitable
to be elected to the grade of MIEM. The Supporters typically have
detailed and up-to-date knowledge of Applicant's work so that al! the
information in the application can be verified.THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
1
‘An application in which the evidence presented is sufficient for a
Prima Facie Case judgment to be made that the Pl Applicant is eligible and ready to
proceed to sit for Professional Interview.
‘A scoring scale used to quantitatively assess the level of competency
Rubries attainment by the P! Candidate for all discrete Competency Elements
based on a specific set of standard criteria.
Description of each of the: four thresholds related to a Competency
‘Threshold Descriptor | Element, It gives a standard interpretation of the threshold.
The minimum level to be met in rating or scoring the degree of
‘Threshold Level competency attainment by the PI Candidate. No partial threshold
shall be given.
‘The UK Standard for
Professional Engineering | The UK standard. which sets out the competence and commitment
Competence for requirements for registration with the Engineering Council as a
Chartered Engineers Chartered Engineer.
(UK-SPEC)
‘An international agreement among bodies responsible for accrediting
engineering degree programmes, recognising the substantial
Washington Accord equivalence of such’ programmes for entry to the practice of
(WA) engineering, In Malaysia, this refers to the academic qualification
requited for registration as Graduate Engineer with BEM or as
| Graduate Member of IEM.Tune pue wooXg,
{q quowiopo|mouyjoy
$988) SSVd
jo jeaouddy
Tounos pue tiooxg Ora
Kq sose. Thva Jo [eaouddy
sdays [reed
0) LOY.
‘MaiAee NANA /
Jaoiddy Lav
249)
‘areprpuey
i uoyequeumnoog,
saurjapind uo poseq
uoqeuatunoop yung
quoudeg
aren
quowidojonaq
youd saqpang
Aad [BuOIssayod J0/
pur aouopiag sowing,
sasuig pur ssev01g u0Nnv.nsIsey IAL / Id
Ova.
uonEnsisoy
yqeaouddy
potas
Avo Id
s}A1U
myLMpWag.
3991)
uoweiuauino0q,
pases
oyuppaeay 89004 Ie
wOHTeNS|sAy
WAIN
Squeotiddy
ATHON
Touno; pur uiMIOdxe, unaring
Aq quowrafipamouyoy ui ysiiang
‘Tiva
SIOMALAON.
weayssed
juioddy
eaID
ora
‘Aq jeaorddy
Id ysaiy - og
‘Avo Je10 uy Ye} -J210 YONPUED>
‘Auuo skess3 ssesseey
wos
Auo [210+
fuuo sfess3.
Weayssea
ine 0
MOIAQY
Id sassy
sJoMalAIo}Uy
quioddy
plvog [dq — MIIA.19}U] [BUOISsaO1g — ¢ 88k)[rounog pu uwooxg
Aq quowa3pa|mowjoy
meassed
Fea19,
Ova Aq
Teaoaddy
SIOMOIADY
gieaddy,
ada00y
speaddy
ayepipue
sosey [voddy — MaIA.10jU] [LUOISSeJO.1g — ¢ 9803STEM PI 0200
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
Professional Interview Competency Model for Written Essays
‘April 2013
‘There are three (3) Competency Categories T, P and W for writen essays. Category T is for
‘Technical Fssay; P for Essey on Professional Ethics; and W for Writing Proficiency which is
common for the two essays. The associated Competency Elements include TI, T2, 13s Pl,
P2, P3; and WL, W2, W3 respectively,
[ T Demonstrate evidence of technical competencies.
[gy _ | Stow evienee of wadertonding he Sleniific and engineering fundamentals
of related discipline and own specialization
Ta __ [Show evienes of app he propriate theoretical and practical methods
to the analysis and solution of engineering problems
T Show evidence of applying the engincering knowledge related to local
13 | practices, codes, standards, specifications, materials, products, environments, |
etc. |
: Demonstrate evidence of competencies related to professional / ‘ethical |
conduct.
py__| Show evidence of wnderstanding TEM 7 BEM Code of Professional Conduct
and contemporary ethical issues in the engineering profession.
pe Show evidence oF aking professional and ihival responsibility in actual work
2 | euation to enhance the honour and reputation of the engineering profession |
oa | Sem eiense oF andestandng the impact Gf engineering solutions in the |
tanger context like society, environment, health, safety and public welfare
P W | Demonstrate evidence of writing and reading competencies.
| Rise & eearondertaning of he questions and 1 able to answer them with
suitable contents and relevant examples
ya _| Present the answer with good structure, proper heading and paragraphing as
well as conciseness, coherence and cohesion
ue | Present the answer legibly with good grammar, lexicon, spelling, ani
L punctuetion
Page 1 of |A TEM PI 0000
° THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
Se ee Professional Interview Se List
|
| Document Number
Professional | ypM P4 [xlly]lz2]
Interview Document and Title
Stage x= Stage y = Sub-stage
z= Revision number
Overall TEM PI 0100 ‘Competency Model For PI Oral Interview |
| Stage 0 TEM PI0200 Competency Model For PI Written Essays
TEM PI 0300 ‘Threshold Descriptors For PI Oral Interview
; tem P1o400 ‘Threshold Descriptors For PI Written Essays
Applicant TEM PI A100 Professional Interview Application Form
Stage A TEMPIA200 | Guidance Notes For Pl Application
| TEMPIA300 | MIEM Application Form
IEM PLAAO1 ‘Training and Experience (Portfolio of Evidence) |
Eee C eC ere gee Lee eSeeSeeL ee ceeseeeeeec
1EM PLASOL Guidance Notes For Portfolio of Evidence
[tent Pr A600 Guidance Notes For Technical Report
1EM PI A700 Inquiry Form For Application Supporters
JEM PI A800 | Guidance ‘Notes On Inquiry Form For Supporters
| 1EM PI A900 | Letter To Application Supporters
Candidate TEM PLC100 Guidance Notes For Pl Candidate |
Stage C |__IEMPIC200 “Not allocated yet” '
| JEM PI C300 Development Action Plan
EM PI. C400 PI Result Appeal Form
Secretariat TEM PI 1100 Guidance Notes For MAB Secretariat
Stage 1 TEM PI 1200 “Application Assessment Processing Form
Page | of 2TEM PI 0000
‘THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
Professional Interview Documentation List
April 2015
Membership IEM PI 2100 Guidance Notes For MAB PI Assessors
Application
Board TEM PI 2200 | Assessor Summary Report
Stage 2 |
|
|, Professional TEM PL 3100 Guidance Notes For Pi Board |
| Interview 7
Board TEM PI 3200 Guidance Notes For PIB Secretariat
Stage 3 TEM PI 3300 Interviewer Acceptance & Declaration Form
|
TEM PI 3400 Guidance Notes For Interviewer A & D
IEM PI 3500 Guidance Notes For PI Interviewers
TEM PI 3600
| Professional Interview Report Form
| IEM PI 3700
Guidance Notes For Appeal
Professional IEM PI 3AC00 Sector Guidance For Academia |
Interview,
Board IEM PI 3BS00 ‘Sector Guidance For Building Services Industry
Stage 3 TEM PI 3100 Sector Guidance For IT and CT
Sector
Guidance | [EM PISTE00 Sector Guidance For Telecommuni
IEM PI 3PW00 Sector Guidance For Power Industry
JEM PI3ME00 —_| Sector Guidance For Mechanical Engineering in
| Building Services, Manufacturing & Production,
Mechanical Plant & Equipment
|
IEM PI 3CS00 Sector Guidance For Civil and Structural |
Engineering Industry
TEM PI 3CE00
Sector Guidance For Chemical / Process
Engineering
Page 2 of 2TEM PI 0100
‘TITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
Competency Model for Oral Interview
‘April 2015
‘This Competency Model for Oral Interview is closely referenced to the UK Standard for
professional Engineering Competence (UK—SPEC), specifically on the Competence and
Commitment Standard for Chartered Engineers.
‘Corporate Members of IEM and Professional Engineers should demonstrate:
= The theoretical knowledge to solve problems in new technologies and develop new
analytical techniques.
= Successful application of the knowledge to deliver innovative products and services and/or
take technical responsibility for complex engineering system
= Accountability for project, finance and personal management and managing trade-offs
between technical and socio-economic factors.
= Skill sets necessary to develop other technical staff.
Effective interpersonal skills in communicating technical matters.
+ Personal commitment to professional standards.
‘This IEM Competency Model consists of eighteen Competency Elements and Standards
grouped under five Competency Categories. The Model demonstrates the underpinning
knowledge and understanding of engineering fundamentals, application abilities. leadership
and management skill, interpersonal skills, and personal commitment to the profession that
must be demonstrated in order to practice professionally. The Competency Elements are used
as the basis for assessing Applicants who apply to sit for the Professional Interview conducted
by the IEM. Applicants will be required to provide evidence of competence against each of
the eighteen Competency Elements. The evidence is to be drawn from their work experience,
specifically as they have encountered engineering problems or engaged in engine
activities.
Page 1 of 6TEM P1 0100
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
Competency Model for Oral Interview
‘April 2015
Tiss combination of general and specialist engineering knowledge and
A understanding to optimise the application of existing and emerging |
technology.
[Maintain and extend a sound theoretical ‘approach in enabling the
‘At [introduction and exploitation of new and advancing technology and other
relevant developments.
FI Candidates will have progressed from the formal educational base to having the breadth
and depth of knowledge, understanding and technical skills necessary to exploit new and
fields. They should be able to identify
developing technologies ftom their own and al
their own personal limits strive to extend their own technological capability and broaden
and deepen their own knowledge base through new applications and techniques. |
is [Engage in the creative and jnnovative development of engineering
i | technology and continuous improvement systems.
Pi Candidates wil have the ability to use their knowledge base and experience as the basis
for the creative or innovative development of technology, products or services. They will
also use their knowledge and understanding to improve produsts or services.
“Apply engineoring Knowledge related to focal practices, codes, standards,
specifications, materials, products, environmental plans and other |
AS requirements; and where appropriate, apply engineering knowledge |
contributed by others including suppliers, consukants, contractors,
‘manufacturers, technologists, researchers and independent experts.
Pi Candidaics will have the ability to use local practices, codes, standards, specifications,
| materials, products, environmental plans and other requirements; and where appropriate,
the engineering knowledge contributed by others including suppliers, consultants,
contractors, manufacturers, technologists, researchers and independent experts as a basis for
developing solutions appropriate to local context and requirements. Collectively, this is
referred to as “local engineering knowledge”, |
Page 2 of 6JEM PI 0100
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
Competency Model for Oral Interview
‘April 2015
A pply appropriate theoretical and practical methods to the analysis ‘and
solution of engineering problems |
7
BI Taentify potential projects and opportunities
PI Candidates will have identified and reviewed new opportunities within their field, using
creative problem solving methodology. They have been involved with or led marketing,
| rendering and specification for new products or systems; They will have devised action
plans, targets and schedules to bring projects to maturity
2 Tonduct appropriate research and undertake design and development of
engineering solutions.
Pi Candidates wi have carried oat theoretical or applied research to evaluate potential |
options, considering cost, resource, safety and env ironmental implications. They will have |
| produced concept and finalised engineering. design, presented proposals and gained
| approvals. This may involve the application of cross disciplinary techniques, technology
and unusual methods of working.
B3 Implement design solutions, and evaluate their effectiveness,
PI Candidates will have implemented the design strategy through to final solution, and
|
devise and apply appropriate crterie for monitoring and evaluating progress and outcomes,
‘They will ensure that design performance, cost benefit and project milestones are met oF
devise appropriate measures or design modifications. They will earry out a project review,
| assessing the performance against the original speification, using the results to improve the
| future design process and build into established procedures.
es
Page 3 of 6JEM PI 0100
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
Competency Model for Oral Interview
April 2015
cI
]
| Provide technical and commercial management.
| Plan for effective project implementation.
objectives,
FL Candidiies plan projects using an understanding of the drivers and objectives of the
husiness or organization involved. This requires the ability to define and agree work
plan deviations and take necessary corrective actions.
estimate timescale and resource requirements, both human and material, ide
oy
I Pian, budget, organise, direct and control tasks, ‘people and resources.
they have
[PL Candidates, using an Tnderstanding of the drivers, objectives and work plans of the
| business or organisation involved, will prioritise and manage the use of available resources.
‘This requires the capability to manage their personal time, and that of any staff for which
resources under their control. |
full project responsibility, general or project budgets, facilites and contractor
C3
Lead teams and develop staff to meet changing technical and managerial |
| needs.
L
PI Candidates will be able to demonstrate leadership whether of technical programmes,
| project teams or specialist staff: They will be able to develop staff to their full potential in
an environment of technical and managerial change.
ca
Bring about continuous improvement through quality management:
PI Candidates will be responsible for continuous improvement in productivity through
quality management using best practice methods. They direct project evaluation and make
recommendations for improvement. |
Page 4 of 6TEM PI 0100
‘THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
Competency Model for Oral Interview
April 2015
D ‘Demonstrate effective interpersonal skills
Tierpersonal skills are to be assessed in three areas: general communications at all levels:
presenting and discussing proposals; and people skills. These skills are of increasing |
importance in modern engineering practice, and ideally ¢ good engineer will be highly
competent in all aspects.
DI I Communicate in English or Malay Language with other at alll levels.
FT Candidates will have writen and oral skill enabling communications in English or
Malay with a wide range of customers and supplies, peers, seniors and juniors within and
outside their employing organisation at all levels. They should be able to contribute to,
chair and record meetings and discussion and exchange information w ‘ith technical and non-
technicel colleagues in a clear and concise manner. |
D2 [ Present and discuss proposals.
{itis port Ghai PT Candidates can present proposals for work programmes and projects
| in a clear and authoritative manner, and be persuasive when discussing details, variations
and implementation. They should be able to prepare and deliver appropriate presentations
and manage debates with audience of ether engineering or non-engineering background.
D3 | Demonstrate personal and social skills
PI Candidates will be able to create, maintain and enhance productive working relationships ]
and resolve conflict. They must be able to apply diversity, be non-discriminatory, confident |
and flexible in dealing with new and changing interpersonal situations. They should know,
and manage their own emotions, strengths and weaknesses, and be aware of the needs and
j concems of others.
Page 5 of 6TEM PI 0100
‘THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
‘Competency Model for Oral Interview
‘April 2015
Demonstrate & personal Commitment to professional standards, recognizing
obligations to society, the profession and the environment
PI Candidates must have personal integrity and a professional approach, It is therefore @ |
condition of resistration that candidates shows adequate commitment (a least level 2) to the
profession under EI, E2 and E3 below. They should demonstrate an understanding of the
need for codes of conduct and statutory requirements with regard to ri ks and is especially
| aware of, and complies with, requirements involving the safety of the community and
protection of the enviroment. They should understand and accepts obligations and
responsibilities to those employing their professional services as well as the wider public
EL Comply with relevant codes of conduct
PI Candidates will be able to show how they comply with the rules of professional conduct
and manage their work within all relevant legislation and regulatory frameworks, including |
social and employment legislation.
[__B2 __ | Manage and apply safe systems of work
Pl Candidates must be able to identity and take responsibility for their obligations for
health, safety and welfare issues. They should be able to manage systems that satisfy health,
safety and welfare requirements, and implement appropriate hazard identification and risk
management systems.
ea | Undertake engineering acdvies ina way That contributes to sustainable
development. |
PI Candidates should operate and act responsibly, taking account of the need to progress
environmental, social and economic outcome simultaneously. They should also understand
and encourage stakeholder involvement in sustainable development.
ca | Cay on continuing professional development necessary to maintain and
\ | enhance competence in own are of practice
Pi Candidates will Keep up to date in an environment of rapidly advancing technology and
organisational change. They should undertake reviews oftheir own development needs and
prepare action plans to meet personel and organisational objectives, They should maintain
evidence of competence development and Keep a current, up to date, CPD plan.
Understand the legal matters pertaining to engineering profession and be
ES
able to communicate with legal personnel on these issues
PI Candidates must be able to understand relevant legal matters that are related to the
engineering work and services. They must possess knowledge on overview of laws having
relevance and impact on the practice of engineering professional services. With the legal
knowledge, they should be able to communicate effectively with legal personnel on these
legal issues.
Page 6 of 6TEM PT 0300
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
‘Threshold Descriptors of Competency Elements.
‘Oral Interview
2015
The Threshold Descriptors provide a standard interpretation of the four threshold levels of
each Competency Element related to the five Competency Categories for oral interview. They
are closely referenced to the similar threshold descriptors of ECUK-SPEC.
A
Use a combination of general and specialist engineering knowledge and understanding
‘to optimise the application of existing and emerging technology.
| Maintain and extend a sound theoretical approach in enabling the
AL introduction and exploitation of new and advancing technology and other
relevant developments.
PI Candidates will have progressed from the formal educational base to having the breadth
and depth of knowledge, understanding and technical skills necessary to exploit new and
developing technologies from their own and allied fields. They should be able to identify
their own personal limits, strive to extend their own technological capability and broaden
and deepen their own knowledge base through new applications and techniques,
Will not demonstrate a basic understanding of theory in the area in which |
‘Threshold 1 | they practice and will not show any examples where they have extended
| their theoretical knowledge to new technologies, services of products
“Will demonstrate a general understanding of theory in the area in which
Threshold 2 | they practice and will show limited examples where they have extended
their theoretical knowiedge to new technologies, services or products.
Will demonstrate a sound understanding of the theory of established and
developing technology in their own field and has been using that
‘Threshold 3 | understanding to introduce and exploit new technologies in their own field;
should have a strategy for ongoing learning in relation to technology
developments.
Will show clear evidence of how they have deepened and broadened their
understanding of new engineering theories and techniques and will be able
to cite a number of examples where they have considerably extended both
Threshold 4 | the depth and breadth of their theoretical knowledge and applied it to new
| j technologies, services or products; will have a well-developed strategy for
| ongoing leaming in relation to technology developments.
‘az | Engage in the creative and innovative development of engineering
technology and continuous improvement systems,
Pl Candidates will have the ability to use their knowledge base and experience as the basis
for the creative or innovative development of technology, products or services. They 1
also use their knowledge and understanding to improve products or services. |
IL not be able to demonstrate how their personal creativity, innovation
Threshold | | and commitment to continuous improvement have contributed to the
programmes on which they have worked.
Page 1 of 14JEM PI 0300
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
‘Threshold Deseriptors of Competency Elements
(Oral Interview
April 2015
Will be able to demonstrate how their personal creativity, innovation and
‘Threshold 2 | commitment to continuous improvement have contributed to the
pr |
programmes on which they have worked. |
Will be able to demonstrate how their personal creativity, innovation and
commitment to continuous improvement have resulted in new products or
services being developed.
Threshold 3
| Will be able to cite a number of examples where their personal creativit
| Threshold 4 | innovation and commitment to continuoys improvement have resulted in
‘major new products or services being developed
Apply engineering knowledge related to local practices, codes, standards,
specifications, materials, products, environmental plans and other
a3 Tequirements; and where appropriate, apply engineering knowledge
contributed by others including suppliers, consultants, contractors,
manufacturers, technologists, researchers and independent experts. |
PI Candidates will have the ability to use local practices, codes, standards, specifications,
| materials, products, environmental plans and other requirements; and where appropriate,
| the engineering Knowledge contributed by others including suppliers, consultants,
cantrastors, manufacturers, technologists, researchers and independent experts as a basis for
Geveloping solutions appropriate to local context and requirements. Collectively, this is
referred to as “local engineering knowledge”.
Will not demonstrate a basic understanding of local engineering knowledge
in the area in which they practice and will not show any examples where
they have applied this local knowledge to develop solution appropriate to |
local context and requirements. |
Threshold |
Will demonstrate a general understanding of local engineering knowledge
srhresnata2 |i the area in which they practice and will show limited examples where
| | they have applied this local knowledge to develop solution appropriate to
| | loca! context and requirements.
Will demonstrate a sound understanding of local engineering knowledge in
the area in which they practice; and have been using that understanding to
develop solution appropriate to local context and requirements; should have
a strategy for keeping up to date with local engineering knowledge,
‘Threshold 3
Will show clear evidence of how they have deepened and broadened their |
Understanding of local engineering knowledge and will be able to cite a
umber of examples Where they have applied this local knowledge to
| develop solution appropriate to local context and requirements; should have
| @ well-developed strategy for keeping up to date with local engine!
| knowledge.
‘Threshold 4
Page 2 of 14TEM PI 0300
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
‘Threshold Descriptors of Competency Elements
Oral Interview
April 20
B
Apply appropriate theoretical and practical methods to the analysis and solution of
engineering problems
BL | {dentify potential projects and opportunities
PI Candidates will have identified and reviewed new opportunities within their field, using
| creative problem solving methodology. They have been involved with or led marketing.
tendering and specification for new products ot systems; They will have devised action
plans, targets and schedules to bring projects to maturity
Will not be able to demonstrate how they have contributed to the process of
Threshold 1 : aaa :
identifying potential projects and opportunities
Will be able to demonstrate how they have contributed to the process of
identifying potential projects and opportunities. They have been or will be
‘Threshold 2 | contributing to the development of opportunities in a closed environment |
(e.g. follow-on projects, framework contract projects and internal reactive |
projects).
Will be able to show how they have personally identified potential projects
and opportunities. They have been or will be leading the development of new
‘Threshold 3 | projects in an open environment (c.g. new products I services for existing
| customers, existing products I services for new clients, or opportunistic
| internal projects)
Will be able to cite a number of examples where they have personally
identified substantial potential projects and opportunities. They have been or
‘will be leading the development of new products I services in a competitive
Threshold 4 az A 7
environment. These projects will be significant in scale or innovation and
will often be secured against stiff competition. ‘They are unlikely to be
internal projects or those secured as part of a framework.
pp | Conduet appropriate research and undertake design and development of
engineering solutions. |
PI Candidates will have cartied out theoretical or applied research to evaluate potential
| options, considering cost, resource, safety and environmental implications. They will have
| produced concept and finalised engineering design, presented proposals and gained
Epprovals. This may involve the application of cross disciplinary techniques, technology
and unusual methods of working,
Page 3 of 14TEM PI 0300
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA.
‘Threshold Descriptors of Competency Elements
Oral Interview
April 2015,
Have not been and will not be conducting elementary analysis of customer
Threshold 1 | requirements or product design, which may show limited innovation or
creativity.
Have been and will be conducting elementary analysis of customer
“Threshotd 2 | "urements or product design. More complex analysis has been of will be |
carried out as part of a team led by a senior engineer. The designs may show
limited innovation or creativity. |
Will be able to demonstrate how they have played a leading role in
| programmes of research and, the design and development of engineering
Threshold 3 | solutions. They will probably be working as a lead engineer in small team
| delivering innovative designs and solutions. They will typically have
couple of junior staff working with them.
Have been a lead engineer, and will be able to cite a number of examples
where they have played a leading role in programmes of research and, the
design and development of novel, major engineering solutions. They will
Threshold 4 | often have a team of engineers working for them on a number of significant
projects containing @ high degree of innovation and creativity. In highly
regulated industries, this is often evidenced by the successful application for
departures from standard,
B3 Implement design solutions, and evaluate their effectiveness.
PI Candidates will have implemented the design strategy through to final solution, and
devise and apply appropriate criteria for monitoring and evaluating progress and outcomes.
They will ensure that design performance, cost benefit and project milestones are met or
devise appropriate measures or design modifications. They will carry out a project review.
assessing the performance against the original specification, using the results to improve the
future design process and build into established procedures.
] Have not been or will not be contibuting to the implementation of a design
“Threshotd 1, tateay and applying appropriate criteria for monitoring and evaluating
progress and outcomes on small projects or those with low complexity.
under a lead engineer.
Page 4 of 14JEM PI 0300
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
“Threshold Descriptors of Competency Elements
Oral Interview
April 2015
Have been or will be contributing to the implementation of a design strategy
and applying appropriate criteria for monitoring and evaluating progress and
outcomes on small projects or those with low complexity. Typically, these
projects will involve the implementation of standard (oz well understood)
Gesigns. For this scale of project, they will typically be responsible for
decision making on timescale and cost of design solution but will often have
the support of a lead engineer. They may also be responsible for the
| evaluation of projects against success criteria agreed with others in detail.
Threshold 2
Have been or will be leading the implementation of a design strategy and
applying appropriate criteria for monitoring and evaluating progress and
Sutcomes on medium projects with high complexity or large projects with
medium complexity. For this scale of project, they will typically be
Threshold 3 | responsible for decision making in relation to the cost and timescale |
implications of design solutions with only a general steer from a managing |
engineer, They are likely to be responsible for the evaluation of projects
fagainst success criteria agreed with stakeholders in terms of strategic
| requirements.
Will be able to display strong leadership in the implementation of project
| design strategy for substantial projects with a high degree of complexity.
They will be responsible for decisions relating to the cost and timescale
“Threshold 4 | imlications of design solutions (often of highly complex projects) and may
: be responsible for setting this strategy across a number of projects. They are
likely to be responsible for the evaluation of a number of projects against
success criteria agreed with stakeholders in terms of strategic requirements
that they themselves may have devised.
Page 5 of 14TEM PI 0300
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
“Threshold Descriptors of Competency Elements
(Oral Interview
April 2015
c
Provide technical and commercial management.
cL
| Plan for effective project implementation.
business or
Pl Candidates plan projects using an understanding of the drivers and objectives of the
‘objectives, estimate timescale and resource requirements, both human and material, identify
plan deviations and take necessary corrective actions.
organization involved. This requires the ability to define and agree work
‘Threshold |
Will not be able to demonstrate how they have contributed to the planning of
projects and risk assessments as well as securing resources and confirming
roles in project teams.
Threshold 2
Will be able to demonstrate how they have contributed to the planning of
projects and risk assessments as well as securing resources and confirming
roles in project teams.
‘Threshold 3
Will have led the production of plans for small and medium sized projects or
made major contributions to large scale project plans using appropriate
formal planning tools. Will have prepared or contributed to budget proposals, |
planed and implemented projects, monitored costs and allocated resources.
‘They will normally be team leaders and be presenting a case for financial
and manpower resources,
|
‘Threshold 4
Will have carried out project risk assessment and showed how these tisks
have been mitigated. Will be able to show how they have collaborated with
other stakeholders such as clients, subcontractors and suppliers; and identify
how they have applied the necessary contractual arrangements
oe Plan, budget, organise, direct and control tasks, people and resources.
PI Candidates, using an understanding of the drivers, objectives and work plans of the
business or organisation involved, will prioritise and manage the use of available resources.
‘This requires the capability to manage their personal time, and that of any staff for which
they have full project responsibility, general or project budgets, faci
resources under their control.
jes and contractor
Threshold 1
Have not led the team or part of it or assisted in the implementation of the |
project.
‘Threshold 2
Will have led the team or part of it and assisted in the implementation of the
project, They have been assisting with team building and the allocation of
tasks to other team members. They will have an understanding of the balance
between quality, costs and times and be aware of contingency processes.
Page 6 of 14TEM PI 0300
‘THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
‘Threshold Descriptors of Competency Elements
Oral Interview
April 2015
Will have managed the implementation of the projects, or played a nar |
role in its implementation. Will have responsibility for performance factors
‘Threshold 3 | and quality, and manage the work of members of the team, Will have an
understanding of all legal and statutory obligations and manage financial,
‘commercial and regulatory constraints.
Will have managed the implementation of major projects, Will have
‘threshota 4 | #5Ponsbilty for performance factors and quality, and manage the work of
the team, Will have an understanding of all legal and statutory obligations
‘and have responsibility for financial, commercial and regulatory matters.
3 Lead teams and develop staff to meet changing technical and ‘managerial
needs. |
|
PI Candidates will be able to demonstrate leadership whether of technical programmes,
project teams or specialist staff. They will be able to develop staff to their full potential in
an environment of technical and managerial change.
| ‘Will not be able to demonstrate the ability to agree objectives and work plans
‘vith junior members of the team and monitor and report their performance.
Threshold | _
No evidence to show awareness of development needs, and help to assess
team and individual performance and provide feedback.
Will be able to agree objectives and work plans with junior members of the
threshold? | 22 nd monitor and report ther performance, Be ava of development |
needs and help to assess tcam and individual performance and provide
feedback
Will have been managing members of the team, taking a technical lead and
cthreshota 3 | allocating tasks and workload. They will ave ‘supervised the performance of
3 | team members and addressed any shortcomings. They will have provided
feedback to support team and individual development.
Will be able to demonstrate how they carry out/contribute to staff appraisals
and contribute to identifying training needs and the development of staf. |
‘Threshold 4 | ee
old 4 | Chow how they manage operations to maintain quality standards. Carry out, |
or contribute to disciplinary procedures.
| ca | ring about continuous improvernent through quality management
Pl Candidates will be responsible for continuous improvement in product vity through
quality management using best practice methods. They direct project evaluation ‘and make
recommendations for improvement.
Page 7 of 14TEM P1 0300
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
‘Threshold Descriptors of Competency Elements
Oral Interview
April 2015
Threshold 1
Threshold 2
Will not be able to show they are aware of quality management principles as
they apply to their own work, and of factors which would improve quality
and performance. They have not contributed to quality audits and been
aware of the need to continuously improve quality.
Will have been aware of quality management principles as they apply to their
‘own work, and of factors which would improve quality and performance.
‘They will have contributed to quality audits and been aware of the need to
continuously improve quality.
‘Threshold 3
Will have been planning and applying quality management principles to their
‘own work and monitoring the operations of the team members to ensure their
application of its principles. They will have continuously reviewed the
project and implemented improvements to quality and delivery where these
are identified.
Threshold 4
Will be able to show evidence of how they have carried out quality audits
and applied best practice methods of continuous improvements such as
1509000, EF M, Balanced Scorecard ete.
Page 8 of 14TEM PI 0300
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
‘Threshold Descriptors of Competency Elements
‘Oral Interview
‘April 2015
D
‘Demonstrate effective interpersonal skills
Interpersonal skills are to be assessed in three areas: general communications at all levels:
| presenting and discussing proposals; and people skills. These skills are of increasing
| importance in modern engineering practice, and ideally a good engineer will be highly
competent in all aspects.
DI ‘Communicate in English or Malay Language with other at all levels.
PI Candidates will have written and oral skills enabling communications in English or
Malay with a wide range of customers and suppliers, peers, seniors and juniors within and
‘outside their employing organisation at all levels. They should be able to contribute to,
chair and record meetings and discussion and exchange information with technical and non- |
technical colleagues in a clear and concise manner.
Will not be able to present ideas, proposals, and documents in a
comprehensive and legible manner, and lack confidence in arguments. They
| have some major shortfalls in composition, grammar and spelling. Reporting
skills will not be adequate.
Will be able to present ideas, proposals, and documents in a comprehensive
| and legible manner, but might lack confidence in arguments. They may have
Threshold 2 | some minor shortfalls in composition, grammar and spelling. Reporting
| skills will be adequate but they will not normally represent work other than
their own at meeting.
‘Communications will be clear and concise. Written material will make easy
reading and oral statements will command attention. Composition, grammar
and spelling will be such as not to attract criticism, Candidates will be trusted
‘Threshold 1
Tht sid 3 7 .
veshold 3 | «5 represent others in their area of work at meeting and negotiations. They
wwill be able to exchange information and provide advice to technical and
non-technical colleagues.
Will be able to demonstrate how they have chaired meetings, recorded
“Threshold 4 | Meeting minutes and/or actions ‘and communicated the outcome of meetings
to team members. Show how they have the ability to exchange information
and provide advice to technical and non-technical colleagues.
|
| D2 | Present and discuss proposals.
Icis important that PI Candidates ean present proposals for work programmes and projects
in a clear and authoritative manner, and be persuasive when discussing details, variations
‘and implementation. They should be able to prepare and deliver appropriate presentations
and manage debates with audience of either engineering or non-engineering background,
Page 9 of 14TEM PI 0300
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
‘Threshold Descriptors of Competency Elements
‘Oral Laterview
‘April 2015
‘Threshold 1
Will not be able to present their own work clearly and make proposals for
new work, and there is some major shortfall in persuasive discussion. They
will not be aware of how to manage a debate with audiences and manage the
feedback of results to improve proposals.
‘Threshold 2
Will be able to present their own work clearly and make proposals for new
work, but there may be some shortfall in persuasive discussion. They will be
aware of how to manage a debate with audiences and manage the feedback
of results to improve proposals
‘Threshold 3
Will be able to report effectively. make formal presentations on behalf of
themselves and others, negotiate, argue persuasively, and make an impact at
meetings. They will be able to prepare and deliver a wide range of
presentations and accept feedback for improvements.
‘Threshold 4
They will be able to demonstrate how they have managed 2 debate with an
audience and fed the results back to improve proposals with an audience of
major clients and senior managers.
D3
Demonstrate personal and social skills
PI Candidates will be able to create, maintain and enhance productive working relationships
and resolve conflict. They must be able to apply diversity, be not
‘and flexible in dealing with new and changing interpersonal situ:
and manage their own emotions, strengths and weaknesses, and be aware of the needs and
coneems of others.
jseriminatory, confident
They should know,
‘Threshold 1
Will not be able to communicate effectively within a team environment, and
adequately with customers and suppliers to maintain existing relationships.
Their action and behavior will unlikely to further the objectives of the team
| and support working relationships.
Threshold 2
| Will be able to communicate cffectively within a team environment, and
adequately with customers and suppliers to maintain existing relationships.
‘Though probably not a team leader, their action and behavior will further the
objectives of the team and support working relationships.
‘Threshold 3
Will have @ central role in the group, contributing to the creation of effective
relationships. Group commitment will not be in doubt and they will be
trusted to interpret policy effectively, report faithfully and develop staff
responsibility.
‘Threshold 4
They will be able to show evidence from colleagues of their personal and
social skills and show how they have contributed to productive working
relationships. Their skills will include the ability to know and manage their
‘own emotions, strengths and weaknesses. When a team is being formed or
extended, they may have a significant role in attracting and selecting suitable
staff.
Page 10 of 14JEM PI 0300
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
‘Threshold Descriptors of Competency Elements
Oral Interview
‘April 2015
E
Demonstrate a personal commitment to professional standards, recognizing
obligations to society, the profession and the environment
Pl Candidates must have personal integrity and a professional approach. It is therefore @
condition of registration that candidates show adequate commitment (at least level 2) to the
profession under Fl, E2 and E3 below. They should demonstrate an understanding of the
need for codes of conduct and statutory requirements with regard to risks and is especially
‘aware of, and complies with, requirements involving the safety of the community and
protection of the environment. They should understand and accepts obligations and
responsibilities to those employing their professional services as well as the wider public
El Comply with relevant codes of conduct
PI Candidates will be able to show how they comply with the rules of professional conduct
‘and manage their work within all relevant legislation and regulatory frameworks, including
social and employment legislation.
Will not be able to demonstrate awareness of, and fully comply with, the
‘Threshold | | codes of conduct which apply to their area of work.
4
Will be able to demonstrate awareness of, and fully comply with, the codes |
Threshold 2 | conduct which apply to their area of work.
Will be able to demonstrate compliance with codes of conduct and statutory
requirements and how they accept responsibility to employers, stakeholders
Threshold 3 | and others. Will show how they have implemented and where relevant
initiated, an appropriate procedures within the work environment. They will
‘also show how they have worked within variety of conditions of contract.
They should be aware of the most up to date legislation and regulatory
frameworks including social and employment legislation. Ideally, they
Threshold 4 | utd have contributed to the affairs of the professional body to which they
belong.
2 | Manage and apply safe systems of work.
PI Candidates must be able to identity and take responsibility for their own obligations for
health, safety and welfare issues. They should be able to manage systems that satisfy health,
safety and welfare requirements, and implement appropriate hazard identification and risk |
management systems,
| Will not be able to demonstrate awareness of, and fully comply with, safety
‘threchotd 1 | Pocedufes which apply in ther area of works and take a responsible attitude
to all aspects of safety. Will also not be aware of safety audits and how to
identify and minimise hazards.
Page 11 of 14TEM PI 0300
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
‘Threshold Descriptors of Competency Elements
Oral Interview
‘April 2015
‘Threshold 2
Will be able to demonstrate awareness of, and fully comply wit, safety |
procedures which apply in their area of work, and take a responsible attitude
to all aspects of safety. Will also be aware of safety audits and how to
identify and minimise hazards
‘Threshold 3
Will show compliance with all relevant safety procedures and accept
responsibility to employers, stakeholders and others. They will show how
they have implemented, and when relevant initiated, any new safety
procedures within their work environment, and understand and manage the
limitations inherent in those procedures.
‘Threshold 4
They should have undertaken formal H&S training and be able to deliver
H&S briefings and inductions. They should be able to carry out safety audits,
identify and minimise hazards as well as being able to assess and control risk.
E3
Undertake engineering activities in a way that contributes to sustainable
development.
PI Candidates should operate and act responsibly, taking account of the need to progress
environmental, social and economic outcome simultaneously. They should also understand
‘and encourage stakeholder involvement in sustainable development.
Threshold |
Will not be aware of the environmental impact of their work, and will not |
seck to contribute to sustainable development
Threshold 2
Will be aware of the environmental impact of their work and seek, as far as
possible, to contribute to sustainable development.
‘Threshold 3
Will be able to show that, as far as possible, the work programmes they are
involved in contribute to sustainable development, and that they have
initiated activities to that end. They will be able to show where they have
involved stakeholders in sustainable developments and worked within
environmental legislation,
‘Threshold 4
Will be able to carry out or contribute to environmental impact and
environmental risk assessments. They should show how they understand and
‘encourage stakeholder involvement in sustainable developments and manage
best practice environmental management systems (ISO14000).
Page 12 of 14TEM PI 0300
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
‘Threshold Descriptors of Competency Elements
Oral Interview
April 2015
Carry out continuing professional development necessary to maintain and
4
- ‘enhance competence in own area of practice.
PI Candidates will keep up to date in an environment of rapidly advancing technology and
organisational change. They should undertake reviews of their own development needs and
prepare action plans to meet personal and organisational objectives. They should maintain
evidence of competence development and keep a current, up to date, CPD plan.
7 cs
Will not be able to carry out personal professional development activities,
‘and show no awareness of the importance of continuing professional
development. Will have no evidence of development and how they keep up
10 date with national and international engineering issues.
Threshold |
Will be able to carry out personal professional development activities but in |
‘an informal or unstructured manner showing limited awareness of the
‘Threshold 2 | importance of continuing professional development. Will have little
evidence of development and how they keep up to date with national and
international engineering issues
| Will understand the importance of continuing professional development,
operate a personal development plan and practice personal professional
‘Threshold 3 | development in a structured manner. Will be able to show evidence of an up
to date CPD plan, show involvement with the affairs of their professional
body and how they have assisted other with their own CPD plan.
‘Show initiative in personal development through on-the-job learning, private
study, in-house courses, extemal courses and conferences. Will be able to
Threshold 4 | show how they have evaluated their CPD outcome against an action plan.
Will show how they have Kept up to date with national and international |
ering issues.
[gs | Understand the tegal matters pertaining to engineering profession and be able
| to communicate with legal personnel on these issues
PI Candidates must be able to understand relevant legal matters that are related to the
engineering work and services. They must possess knowledge on overview of laws having
felevance and impact on the practice of engineering professional services. With the legal
knowledge, they should be able to communicate effectively with legal personne! on these
Jegal issues.
Will not be able to understand the legal matters relating to engineering
Threshold 1 | professional work and services, and show no awareness of the importance of
having the legal knowledge that relates to engineering practice.
Page 13 of 14TEM PI 0300
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
“Threshold Descriptors of Competency Elements
Oral Interview
‘April 2015
‘Threshold 2
Will be able to understand the legal matters to limited extent, but have no
sound knowledge of the inter-relation with the engineering professional work
and services. Show limited awareness of the importance of having the legal
knowledge that relates to engineering practice.
Threshold 3
Will be able to understand the legal matters that affect engineering work and
services. Understand the importance of having legal knowledge that is
necessary to perform engineering work effectively.
‘Threshold 4
Will be able to communicate effectively with legal personnel on the legal
issues that affect the engineering work and services. Show awareness with
most up-to-date legislations and regulatory framework,
Page 14 of 14TEM PI 0400
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
‘Threshold Interpretation of Competency Elements
Written Essays
April 2015
The Threshold Descriptors provide a standard interpretation of the four threshold levels of
each Competency Element related to the three Competency Categories for written essays,
T
‘Demonstrate evidence of technical competencies
Show evidence of understanding the scientific and engineering
i fundamentals of related discipline and own specialization
“Tmeshotg 1 | Does Pot show evidence of understanding the scientific and engineering
fundamentals of related discipline and own specialization
5 | Does show few basic evidence of understanding the scientific and
Threshold2 | Dees. Sh ; =
engineering fundamentals of related discipline and own specialization
Does show some evidence of understanding the s itific and engineering
Threshold 3 ‘
fundamentals of related discipline and own specialization
Does show clear and solid evidence of understanding the scientific and
Threshold 4 " ae as
engineering fundamentals of related discipline and own specialization
‘ty__| Show evidence of applying. the appropriate theoretial and. practical
2 methods to the analysis and solution of engineering problems
pwesnoig 1 | D8RS NOt show evidence of applying the appropriate theoretical and
practical methods to the analysis and solution of engineering problems
| Does show few basic evidence of applying the appropriate theoretical and
Threshold 2 cs
practical methods to the analysis and solution of engineering problems
“Threshold 3) DO®S show some evidence of applying. the appropriate theoretical and
practical methods to the analysis and solution of engineering problems
“threshold 4 | D9®S show clear and solid evidence of applying the appropriate theoretical
and practical methods to the analysis and solution of engineering problems
Show evidence of applying the engineering knowledge related to local
13 practices, codes, standards, specifications, materials, products,
environments, et.
Does not demonstrate a basic understanding of engineering knowledge
related to local practices, codes, standards, specifications, materials,
Threshold 1 | products, environments, ete.; did not provide any examples where he has
applied this knowledge to develop solution appropriate to local context and
requirements.
Page 1 of 3TRM PI 0400
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
‘Threshold Interpretation of Competency Elements
Written Essays
April 2015
‘Threshold 2
Does demonstrate 2 general understanding of engineering knowledge
related to local practices, codes, standards, specifications, materials,
products, environments, etc.; and show limited examples where he has
applied this knowledge to develop solution appropriate to local context and
requirements
‘Threshold 3
Does demonstrate a sound understanding of engineering knowledge related
to local practices, codes, standards, specifications, materials, products,
environments, etc.; and show some examples where he has applied this
knowledge to develop solution appropriate to local context and
requirements.
‘Threshold 4
Does show clear evidence of a solid and in-depth understanding of
engineering Knowledge related to local practices, codes, standards,
specifications, materials, products, environments, etc; and cite good
examples where he has applied this knowledge to develop solution
appropriate to local context and requirements.
Page 2 of STEM PT 0400
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
‘Threshold Interpretation of Competency Elements
Written Essays
April 2015
P
Demonstrate evidence of competencies related to professional / ethical conduct
‘Show evidence of understanding IEM / BEM Code of Professional Conduct
PI : ean :
and contemporary ethical issues in the engineering profession.
Does not demonstrate a basic understanding of IEM / BEM Code of
‘Threshold 1 | Professional Conduct and contemporary ethical issues in the engineering
profession.
Does demonstrate a basic understanding of IEM / BEM Code of Professional
|
Threshold 2 :
a Conduct and contemporary ethical issues in the engineering profession.
Does demonstrate some evidence of a good understanding of IEM / BEM
Threshold 3 | Code of Professional Conduct and contemporary ethical issues in the
engineering profession.
Does demonstrate a clear evidence of broad and in-depth understanding of
‘Threshold 4 | IEM / BEM Code of Professional Conduet and contemporary ethical issues
in the engineering profession.
P2 ‘Show evidence of taking professional & ethical responsibility in actual work
situation to enhance the honour and reputation of the engineering profession
Does not show evidence of taking professional & ethical responsibility in
‘Threshold 1 | actual work situation to enhance the honour and reputation of the
engineering profession
Does show basic evidence of taking professional & ethical responsibility in |
Threshold 2 | actual work situation to enhance the honour and reputation of the
engineering profession
Does show some evidence of taking professional & ethical responsibility in
Threshold 3 | actual work situation to enhance the honour and reputation of the
| engineering profession
| Does show good evidence of taking professional & ethical responsibility in
Threshold 4 | actual work situation to enhance the honour and reputation of the
engineering profession
Show evidence of understanding the impact of engineering solutions in the
P3_ | larger context like society, environment, health, safety and public welfare
Does not show evidence of understanding the impact of engineering
Threshold 1 | solutions in the larger context like society, environment, health, saféty and
public welfare
Page 3 of 5‘Threshold 2 | solutions in the larger context like society, environment, health, safety and
Threshold 3 | solutions in the larger context like society, environment, health, safety and
TRM PI 0400
‘THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
‘Threshold Interpretation of Competency Blements
Written Essays
April 2015
Does show few basic evidence of understanding the impact of engineering
public welfare
Toes show some good evidence of understanding the impact of engineering
public welfare
‘Threshold 4 | engineering solutions in the larger context like society, environment, health,
Does show clear and solid evidence of understanding the impact of
safety and public welfare
Page 4 of 5TEM PT 0400
‘THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
‘Threshold Interpretation of Competency Elements
Written Essays
April 2015,
Ww
Demonstrate evidence of writing and reading competencies.
Have a clear understanding of the questions and is able to answer them with
wi
| | suitable contents and relevant examples
Threshold 1 ‘Does not demonstrate a basic understanding of the question asked, and does
not answer to the key points with suitable contents and relevant examples.
Does demonstrate a basic understanding of the question asked, and does
Threshold 2 | answer to only certain less important points with general contents and
examples.
Does demonstrate a clear understanding of the question asked, and does
Threshold 3 =
‘answer to some Key points with reasonable contents and good examples.
Does demonstrate a sound understanding of the question asked, and does
Threshold 4 | answer to all key points with solid and intelligent contents and excellent
examples.
wo Present the answer with good structure, proper heading and paragraphing as
well as conciseness, coherence and cohesion
T 5
Does present the answer but without structure, proper heading and
Threshold 1 | : :
paragraphing as well as conciseness, coherence and cohesion
Does present the answer with only some resemblance of structure, proper
| Threshold 2 ; dat
| heading and paragraphing but without conciseness, coherence and cohesion
Does present the answer with structure, proper heading and paragraphing as
Threshold 3 EB
‘well as acceptable conciseness, coherence and cohesion
Does present the answer with good structure, proper heading and
‘Threshold 4 “ fi
paragraphing as well as high conciseness, coherence and cohesion
Wws__| Present the answer legibly with good grammar, lexicon, spelling, and
punctuation
‘Threshold 1 | D9eS not. present the answer legibly, and with unacceptable errors in |
grammar, lexicon, spelling, and punctuation
‘Threshold 2 | Does present the answer legibly, but with some clear errors in grammar,
‘Threshold 3
lexicon, spelling, and punctuation
Does present the answer legibly, with a few acceptable errors in grammar,
lexicon, spelling, and punctuation
‘Threshold 4
‘Does present the answer legibly, with good grammar, lexicon, spelling, and
punctuation
Page 5 of 5L
TEM PI A200
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
Guidance Notes on Professional Interview Application
April 2015
Introduction
LL.
12.
A-
The Applicant (Intending Candidate) must have at least three (3) years of practical
working experience after obtaining an accredited engineering degree before he is
cligibie to apply to sit for professional interview. Presentation of your submission
will contribute to the IEM Assessment of your application.
11. This form should be word-processed and submitted electronically. A
minimum font size of 9 should be used.
1.1.2. Alternatively, the form should be type-written using black ink.
1.1.3. Do not bind or glue sheets together as your application will be scanned.
Your application will be assessed against the IEM PI Competency Model. Please
ensure that you are aware of the requirements.
Your Details
2,1 .Please provide your personal details including your contact address.
2.2.¥ou may choose to sit for the Professional Interview in either English or Bahasa
Malaysia. Upon making the choice, the entire Professional Interview shall be
conducted in the selected language, including the various forms, technical report,
oral interview and the written essays.
2.3:The IEM has the following regional IEM Branches. Although you may indicate your
preferred Branch for the interview, TEM cannot guarantee meeting your request:
2.3.1. Kedah/Perlis
2.3.2. Perak
2.3.3. Southern
2.34, Kelantan
2.3.5. Sabah
2.3.6. Kuala Lumpur / Petaling Jaya
2.3.7. Terengganu
2.3.8. Pahang
2.3.9. Sarawak
2.3.10. Melaka
23.11. Miri
2.3.12, Penang
2.3.13. Negeri Sembilan
Page 1 of 8TEM PI A200
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
Guidance Notes on Professional Interview Application
April 2015
2.4. If you have special requirements, please let us know so that appropriate arrangements
can be made.
2.5. You may be asked to attend the interview in Kuala Lumpur / Petaling Jaya for
specific reasons such as no qualified Interviewer in the preferred Branch, need to
speed up the interview process, ete.
B—Current Employment
3.1. Please complete details of your current employment
C- Your Expertise
4.1. You must select the main sector and sub sectors most relevant to you and your
them in the application form.
area of expertise. For “others”, please speci
4.2. Specify your engineering discipline as registered with the Board of Engineers,
Malaysia (BEM) and support this by attaching a copy of the BEM registration
certificate.
D- Tertiary Education
5.1. You must give details of:
3.1.1. All higher academic qualifications, including any which you have
already registered with the IEM under the following degree awarded —
MEng, BEng, MSc, BSc, PHD, etc.
5.1.2, Any formally assessed work-based learning.
5.2. _ Please provide a copy of your further or higher education certificate(s) with your
application. These must be signed by one of your Supporters as a true copy of the
original.
E -- Professional Development or Training Schemes (if applicable)
6.1. You must give details of:
6.1.1. Formal or structured training or the Professional Development Scheme
you have completed e.g. Mandatory BEM Courses, Employer
Professional Development Scheme, Apprenticeship Scheme, IEM Log-
Book Scheme, Professional Certification, etc.
Page 2 of 8TEM PI A200
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
Guidance Notes on Professional Interview Application
April 2015
A
6.1.2. The scheme number, if accredited by the IEM or another professional
institution. Please give name of accrediting institution and scheme
number ifapplicable.
7, F—Professional Services, Papers Presented ete.
7.1. You must give details of:
7.1.1. Any reports, papers and patents published in your name. (If you work in
a research or academic environment, summarise your published papers
‘onno more than one A4 sheet.)
7.1.2. Any significant technical reports you have written (or co-authored)
during your career which demonstrate your technical ability.
7.13. Any professional service such as the IEM committee membership,
schools’ liaison, or other activities, which raise the profile of engineering
and technology.
TAA. Any service to the community such as school governor, schoo! alumni,
university / college alumni, Old Boys President, Parent Teacher
Association, ete.
8. G— Organisation Chart / Accountability Diagram
in chart / accountabili
8.1. Please provide an up-to-date organisat diagram providing
the following details:
8.1.1. Two or three levels of authority above and below your post.
8.1.2. Your post (indicated with an arrow).
8.1.3. Any professionally registered corporate members of the IEM or similar
and
professional bodies, noting their category of members
registration.
8.2. Ifyou have changed your job within the last three (3) veers, inelude the diagram
for your previous post on a separate AA sheet, together with the relevant date(s)
83. _ Ifyour organisation operates a flat-based structure, please illustrate.
Do not use any pictures, colour or shading as these make the diagram legible
when photocopied.
Page 3 of 8TEM PI A200
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
Guidance Notes on Professional Interview Application
‘April 2015
9, H—Relevant Career History
OL
92.
93.
96.
Please provide details of your work experience, following the advice below
‘This part of your application is particularly important and you need t0 present
your evidence carefully and concisely. Your objective is to “sell” yourself to the
interviewers in your application form, so that before you walk into the interview
they have already thought thet you are eligible / registrable and all they have to do
is confirm your competence.
Summarise your employment history by giving the following for each post you
have held: dates; name & place of employer; your job title; your main
responsibilities and achievements rather than a bland job description. You should
complete at least one page es itis unlikely that less than one page will adequately
demonstrate your relevant experience.
Arrange your experience in chronological order, preferably starting with your
carliest post.
Remember when presenting evidence:
05.1. Keep it personal, ie. talk about your own achievements, not what the
team did.
95.2. Use terms such as." led, designed, built, tested, negotiated, presented,
‘implemented, solved, achieved, operated, maintained, researched
9.53, Avoid use of jargon and unnecessary or unexplained abbreviations.
9.54, Use language that cen be understood by someone who is not a specialist
in your field.
9.55, Use words like “I designed the XYZ system” rather than “the XYZ
system was designed” s0 that you are clearly stating who did what and
‘emphasising your own individual role
95.6. Give evidence on how you have broadened and deepened your
weering knowledge and skills.
Give an extended description of your current role, or the role that is most relevant
to the demonstration of your current competence, giving details of your
responsibilities. You should aim to be very specific in your examples and if you
Page 4 of 8TEM PI A200
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
Guidance Notes on Professional Interview Application
April 2015
have held lots of different roles, you should select examples that best illustrate
your competence.
9:7. Give an extended description of the role that is most relevant to the demonstration
of the required competencies with specific examples. Highlight personal
experience and contribution, not just an inventory of works.
9.8. Give concise examples of how you apply fundamental engineering principles to
analyse and solve engineering problems encountered during the ordinary course of
your working experience. Enlarge on the decisions you have made and the
implications.
9.9. Indicate the size and complexity of the projects or tasks for which you have had
direct responsibility, and quantify any budget(s) for which you have had overall
responsibility. Use numbers to show the size and scale of your responsibility; for
example, numbers of people supervised, or the value in financial terms of the
activity for which you were responsible.
9.10, Structure your presentation to give evidence that you have attained the necessary
breadth and depth of practical taining and professional experience for the
professional interview, This is typically illustrated by @ gradual progression in
your career towards increasing competeney and responsibility.
9.11. Remember that your application form will be used as an agenda for the interview,
therefore it is in your own interest to give a fall and clear summary of your
responsibil
ies and competence, otherwise time will be wasted while the
interviewers try and understand facts which should have been given on the form.
9.12. When you have submitted your application form, it will be checked by IEM staff
and then reviewed by a Committee to determine if there is sufficient evidence that
you have the competence required to progress to a Professional Interview. or if
further evidence of your competence is needed.
10. 1— Declaration
10.1. In
jal cach and every page of your application form. Sign and date the
application, confirming the statements given are true to the best of your
knowledge.
Page 5 of 810.3.
TEM PI A200
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
Guidance Notes on Professional Interview Application
April 2015
Declare that you do not pl
jarise in your application. Understand that
plagiarising will render the application null and void and you may be barred from
professional interview.
Make sure that you only sign the declaration after all your supporters have signed.
11. J ~ Supporters’ Details
i.
12.
11.3.
nA.
‘The IEM requires your application to be supported. Supporters will all be required
to confirm your suitability for Corporate Membership.
You need to choose Supporters who know you well and be convinced, through
direct or personal experience, that you are suitable to be elected to the grade of
MIEM. The Supporters typically have detailed and up-to-date knowledge of your
‘work so that all the information in the application can be verified.
Please see below who may act in the roles of Supporter.
11.3.1. Professional engineer registered with the Board of Engineers, Malaysia
(BEM), who is a Member or Fellow of IEM; or Engineering Council
(UK) registered engineer, who is 2 Member or Fellow of the respective
institution; or a registered engineer of another professional engineering
organisation of equivalent standing registrable with BEM as Professional
Engineer, working at a senior level to the Applicant, preferably for at
least two years, and with direct knowledge of the Applicant's work, role
and responsibilities.
11.3.2, Where a MIEM/PE or its equivalent that has direct knowledge of the
Applicant is not available, the current line manager, or employer in a
higher organisational hierarchy, may act as Supporter, provided they are
MIEM/PE ot equivalent
11.3.3. At least one of the Supporters must be of the same engineering discipline
and from the same organisation as the Applicant.
For Applicant who does not have a MIEM/PE of same discipline within the
“organization, the Applicant can opt to have a Mentor under the IEM Log Book
‘Training Scheme.
Page 6 of 8TEM PI A200
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
Guidance Notes on Professional Interview Application
April 2015
11.4.1, Nominate a willing Mentor, who is typically a MIEM/PE of same
discipline from another organization (preferably same industry BUT not
mandatory); request the Mentor to register with IEM under the IEM Log
Book Training Scheme.; or
11.4.2. Register with IEM for the IEM Look Book Training Scheme so thet ¢
‘Mentor can be arranged from a pool of MIEM/PE who is willing to help.
11.5. The third supporter signature is optional and may be necessary, for example, if
you work on contracts, as an additional signature to enable adequate verification
of periods for your employment.
11.6. It is important to choose a lead Supporter who can help you in the process of PI
application, including the advice on filling up the PI Application Form, presenting
the ‘Training & Experience Report (Portfolio of Evidence Form) Form, drafting
the Technical Report, preparing for the actual Interview, ete,
12, Training & Experience Report (Portfolio of Evidence Form) Form
12.1, In support of your application, you are required to submit two (2) copies of the
‘Training & Experience Report (Portfolio of Evidence Form) Form based on the
competency clements / categories defined in the relevant guides
12.2. Please note that your registration cannot be completed until the Training &
Experience Report (Portfolio of Evidence Form) Form has been received and
reviewed as part of your overall application.
13, Technical Report
13.1. To show fill preparedness for the Professional Interview, you are required to
submit two (2) copies of Technical Report or Project Report together with the Pl
Application Form. You should refer to the Guidance Notes on Technical Report
for his preparation.
13.2. Please note that your registration cannot be completed if the Technical Reports
have not been received and reviewed as part of your overall application.
Page 7 of 8TEM PI A200
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
Guidance Notes on Professional Interview Application
April 2015
14. Additional Information
14.1
142.
143.
The IEM is appointed by the Board of Engineers, Malaysia (BEM) to conduct the
Professional Interview of which a Pass would lead to an award of the professional
engineering qualification.
The information you provide initially will be used to carry out a review of your
application. As a result, you may be asked to provide further information about
your work experience to successfully demonstrate the competences set out in IEM
PI Competeney Model.
If you have any enquiries, please contact the IEM Secretariat for PI Application.
‘The contact details are below.
IEM Secretariat (PI Application)
‘Tel: +603 79684013/4007/4008
Page 8 of 8WPI A401
‘Training & Experience Report (Portfolio of Evidence)
April 2016
Training & Experience Report |
In terms of Portfolio of Evidence on Competency Categories |
Full Name |
Nationality
IC No. / Passport No.
Date of
th
| Place of Birth
‘Mobile Phone
E-Mail Address
Corresponding Address
The Training & Experience Report is inthe form of giving a portfolio of evidence.
| oh
provided in support of the application regarding the required competencies.
5 Report must be submitted together with the PI Application Form. The evidence is
‘The required competencies are described in the Competency Categories attached to the
Guidance Notes A501 for Training & Experience Report (Portfolio of Evidence).
If you choose to submit hard copy, do not bind or glue sheets together as your application
will be scanned.
s _|
[ declare that I do not plagiarise in this submission. T understand that plagiarising will |
render my application null and void and I may be barred from Professional Interview.
| Name Signature :
L
Page | of 6ITEM PI A401
Training & Experience Report (Portfolio of Evidence)
April 2016
A, Use a combination of general and specialist engineering knowledge and understanding to optimise |
the application of existing and emerging technology.
Revision
Evidence of Your Competence on Competency Category A :
ate
Declaration of | Name:
The Candidate | Signature
Tam confident that the evidence described above is a true record of the
Declaration of | competencies that have been demonstrated by this Candi
‘The Supporter | Name:
Signature:
Page 2 of 6TEM PI A401
Training & Experience Report (Portfolio of Evidence)
April 2016
B. Apply appropriate theoretical and practical methods to the analysis and solution of engineering
problems.
Revision
Evidence of Your Competence on Competency Category B
Date
Declaration of | Name.
‘The Candidate | Signature :
Tam confident that the evidence described above is a true record of the
Declaration of | competencies that have been demonstrated by this Candidate.
The Supporter | Name:
Signature:
Page 3 of 6TEM PI A401
Training & Experience Report (Portfolio of Evidence)
April 2016
technical and commercial management.
Revision
Evidence of Your Competence on Competency Category C ‘
ate
|
|
|
Declaration of ‘Name :
The Candidate | Signature =
Tam confident that the evidence described above is a true record of the
Declaration of
‘The Supporter
competencies that have been demonstrated by this Candidate,
Name:
Signature:
Page 4 of 6IEM PI A401
‘Training & Experience Report (Portfolio of Evidence)
April 2016
D. Demonstrate effective interpersonal skills.
Revision
Evidence of Your Competence on Competency Category D a
ate
Declaration of — [ Name
‘The Candidate | Signatu
[Tam confident that the evidence described above is a true record of the
Deetaatonof | competencies that have been demonstrated by this Candidate.
‘The Supporter | Name:
| Signature:
Page 5 of 6TEM PI A401
Training & Experience Report (Portfolio of Evidence)
April 2016
E. Demonstrate a personal commitment to professional standards, recognizing obligations to society,
the profession and the environment,
Evidence of Your Competence on Competency Category E
Revision
Date
Declaration of
‘The Candidate
| Name =
Signature :
Declaration of
‘The Supporter
competencies that have been demonstrated by this Candidate.
‘Name:
Signature:
Tam confident that the evidence described above is a true record of the
Page 6 of 6TEM PI A501
ing & Experience Report (Portfolio of Evidence)
2016
Guidance Notes for Trai
1. These guidance notes are intended for the Professional Interview Applicant who has to fill
up the Training & Experience Report in terms of Portfolio of Evidence on professional
engineering competencies in support of his application to sit for PI.
‘The Applicant is required to submit two (2) copies of Training & Experience Report
(Portfolio of Evidence) together with the PI Application Form.
‘Applicant is required to provide a portfolio of evidence regarding the competencies
required as a condition to be assessed for his eligibility or readiness to sit for the
Professional Interview.
4. Applicant is advised to refer to the attached Competency Framework regarding the
description of Competency Categories and Competency Elements.
5. Applicant is required to provide evidence for each of the five (5) Competency Categories
A,B,C, Dand E.
6. The evidence should indicate how the Applicant has gained or obtained the required
competency citing specific examples from projects or works he hes undertaken in the
ordinary course of the Applicant’s work.
7. Applicant should provide the evidence in @ clear and concise manner detailing only the
essential facts as proof of competencies, and sign on every page of the report / form,
8. Applicant may attach relevant documentation to support the evidence of competency, and
initia/sign on every page of the attached documentation. The supporting documentation
should also be clearly referenced.
9, The evidence written for each Competency Category (A, B, C, D, and £) should typically
be around 500 words, excluding appendices and attachments.
10, Applicant should take note that the right-hand colurnn denotes revision and date ofthe re
submission of evidence; hence the column should be left blank in the first submission.
When the Applicant is asked to re-submit the evidence regarding certain Competency
Category, the relevant column(s) for that Competency Category should indicate
Rev0l/Date of the first re-submission. The same applies to all subsequent re-submissions,
namely Rev02/Date of second re-submission ..... RevON/Date ‘of N" re-submission. This
serves to help tracking all re-submissions of evidence for a particular Competency
Category.
Page | of 7IEM PI ASOt
Guidance Notes for Training & Experience Report (Portfolio of Evidence)
April 2016
of the report / form, including the supporting documentation.
12, Applicant should understand that the documentary evidence is important in his application
in that it will help IEM PI Assessor to assess the adequacy. of competence in each of the
Competency Categories A, B, C, D and E in order to determine whether the competency
profile of the Applicant as a whole is sufficient to make him eligible or ready to sit for the
professional interview.
13. This form should be word-processed and submitted electronically. A minimum font size
‘of 9 should be used. Alternatively, the form should be type-written using blac!
14. Ifyou choose to submit hard copy, do not bind or glue sheets together as your application
will be scanned, Additional sheets could be used if the space provided is not adequate.
15. Declare that you do not plagiarise in this submission, You should understand that
plagiarising will render your application null and void and you may be barred from the
Professional Interview.
Page 2 of 7IEM PI A501
Guidance Notes for Training & Experience Report (Portfolio of Evidence)
April 2016
Competency Category A
Use a combination of general and specialist engineering knowledge and understanding to
optimise the application of existing and emerging technology.
Maintain and extend a sound theoretical approach in enabling the
Al introduction and exploitation of new and advancing technology and other
relevant developments.
‘A Professional Engineer will have progressed from the formal educational base to having
the breadth and depth of knowledge, understanding and technical skills necessary to exploit
new and developing technologies from their own and allied fields. They should be able to
identify their own personal limits, strive to extend their own technological capability and
broaden and deepen their own knowledge base through new applications and techniques.
Engage in the creative and innovative development of engineering
AQ 7 ;
technology and continuous improvement systems.
‘A Professional Engineer will have the ability to use their knowledge base and experience as
the basis for the creative or innovative development of technology, products or services.
They will also use theit knowledge and understanding to improve products or services.
‘Apply engineering knowledge related to local practices, codes, standards,
specifications, materials, products, environmental plans and other
A3 requirements; and where appropriate, apply engineering knowledge |
contributed by others including suppliers,” consultants, contractors,
manufacturers, technologists, researchers and independent experts, |
A Professional Engineer will have the ability to use local practices, codes, standards,
specifications, materials, products, environmental plans and other requirements; and where
appropriate, the engineering knowledge contributed by others including suppliers,
consultants, contractors, manufacturers, technologists, researchers and independent experts
as a basis for developing solutions appropriate to local context and requirements,
Collectively, this is referred to as “local engineering knowledge”
Page 3 of 71EM PI ASOL
ing & Experience Report (Portfolio of Evidence)
April 2016
Guidance Notes for Trait
‘Competency Category B
‘Apply appropriate theoretical and practical methods to the analysis and solution of
engineering problems
BL Identify potential projects and opportunities
‘A Professional Engineer will have identified and reviewed new opportunities within their
field, using creative problem solving methodology. Have been involved with or led
marketing, tendering and specification for new products or systems; will have devised
action plans, targets and schedules to bring projects to maturity.
Conduct appropriate research and undertake design and development of
B2
engineering solutions.
‘A Professional Engineer will have carried out theoretical or applied research to evaluate
potential options, considering cost, resource, safety and environmental implications. Will
have produced concept and finalised engineering design, presented proposals and gained
approvals. This may involve the application of eros disciplinary techniques, technology
and unusual methods of working.
B3 _| Implement design solutions, and evaluate their effectiveness.
A Professional Engineer will have implemented the design strategy through to final
solution, and devise and apply appropriate criteria for monitoring and evaluating progress |
and outcomes. Will ensure that design performance, cost benefit and project milestones are
met or devise appropriate measures or design modifications. Carry out a project review,
assessing the performance against the original specification, using the results to improve the
future design process and build into established procedures.
Page 4 of 7TEM PI ASO1
Guidance Notes for Training & Experience Report (Portfolio of Evidence)
April 2016
Competency Category C
Provide technical and commercial management.
Cl | Plan for effective project implementation.
'A Professional Engineer plans projects using an understanding of the drivers and objectives
of the business or organization involved. This requires the ability to define and agree work
objectives, estimate timescale and resource requirements, both human and material, identify
plan deviations and take necessary corrective actions.
C2 | Plan, budget, organise, direct and control tasks, people and resources.
'A Professional Engineer, using an understanding of the drivers, objectives and work plans |
of the business or organisation involved, will prioritise and manage the use of available |
resources, This requires the capability to manage their personal time, and that of any staff
for which they have full project responsibility, general or project budgets, facilities and
contractor resources under their control.
Lead teams and develop staff to meet changing technical and managerial
| G needs.
"A Professional Engineer will be able to demonstrate leadership whether of technical
programmes, project teams or specialist stafT. They will be able to develop staff to their full
potential in an environment of technical and managerial change,
C4 | Bring about continuous improvement through quality management.
'A Professional Engineer will be responsible for continuous improvement in productivity
through quality management using best practice methods. Direct project evaluation and |
make recommendations for improvement. |
Page 5 of 7TEM PI ASOL
ing & Experience Report (Portfolio of Evidence)
April 2016
Guidance Notes for Trai
Competency Category D
Demonstrate effective interpersonal skills
Interpersonal skills are to be assessed in three areas: general communic:
| presenting and discussing proposals; and people skills. These skills are of increasing
importance in modern engineering practice, and ideally a good engineer will be highly
competent in all aspects.
other at all levels.
DI | Communicate in English wit
A Professional Engineer will have written and oral skills enabling communications in
English with a wide range of customers and suppliers, peers, seniors and juniors within
and outside their employing organisation at all levels. They should be able to contribute to,
chair and record meetings and discussion and exchange information with technical and non- |
technical colleagues in a clear and concise manner.
D2 _| Present and discuss proposals.
|
Tes important that a Professional Engineer can present proposals for work programmes and
projects in a clear and authoritetive manner, and be persuasive when discussing details,
| variations and implementation. They should be able to prepare and deliver appropriate
| presentations and manage debates with audience.
D3 Demonstrate personal and social skills
'A Professional Engineer will be able to create, maintain and enhance productive working
relationships and resolve conflict. They must be able to apply diversity and anti-
discrimination legislation and be confident and flexible in dealing with new and changing
interpersonal situations. They should know, and manage their own emotions, strengths and
‘weaknesses, and be aware of the needs and concems of others.
Page 6 of 7TEM PI A501
Guidance Notes for Training & Experience Report (Portfolio of Evidence)
April 2016
| Competency Category E
Demonstrate a personal commitment to professional standards, recognizing obligations to
society. the profession and the environment
EL Comply with relevant codes of conduct / practice
‘A Professional Engineer will be able to show how they comply with the rules of
professional conduct and mage their work within all relevant legislation and regulatory
frameworks, including social and employment legislation.
E2 | Manage and apply safe systems of work.
‘A Professional Engineer must be able to identity and take responsibility for their own
obligations for health, safety and welfare issues. They should be able to manage systems
that satisfy H&S and welfare requirements, and implement appropriate hazard identification
and risk management systems.
Undertake engineering activities in a way thet contributes to sustainable
development.
E3
‘A Professional Engineer should operate and act responsibly, taking account of the need to
progress environmental, social and economic outcome simultaneously. They should also
understand and encourage stakeholder involvement in sustainable development.
Carty out continuing professional development necessary to maintain and
enhance competence in own area of practice.
E4
‘A Professional Engineer will keep up to date in an environment of rapidly advancing
technology and organisational change. They should undertake reviews of their own
| development needs and prepare action plans to meet personal and organisational objectives.
‘They should maintain evidence of competence development and keep a current, up to date,
CPD plan.
Understand the legal matters pertaining to engineering profession and be able
ES : :
to communicate with legal personnel on these issues
A Professional Engineer must be able to understand relevant legal matters that are related to
the engineering work and services. He must possess knowledge on overview of laws having
relevance and impact on the practice of engineering professional services. With the legal
knowledge, he should be able to communicate effectively with legal personnel on these
legal issues.
Page 7 of7TEM PI A600
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
Guidance Notes for Technical Report
April 2015
1. These guidance notes are intended for the Professional Interview Applicant who has to
submit the Technical Report in support of his application to sit for Professional Interview,
‘The Applicant is required to submit two (2) copies of Technical Report together with the
PI Application Form.
3. The Technical Report shall demonstrate that the Applicant has attained the engineering
knowledge, understanding, and application in
engineering discipline (branch)
Jexpertise area at the level necessary to underpin the technical competencies required for a
MIEM/PE.
4, Although there is no fixed format for the Technical / Project Report, it is strongly
recommended that the Applicant shall ensure that the Report contains some essential parts
which are inclusive of, but not limited to the following:
4,1, Allist of contents, including the appendices.
4.2. A briof executive summary as a preamble.
4.3. A column on the right of each and every page of the Report for the Supporter /
‘Supervising Engineer to certify
4.4, A checklist at the end of the Report for the Applicant to check, sign and confirm
all documentations submitted in the report by him.
‘The Professional Interview application process shall not be complete until the Technical
Report has been completed and assessed to be satisfactory.
6. Ifthe Technical Report is assessed to be unsatisfactory, the Applicant will be asked to re~
submit the Report within a stipulated time. [EM will inform him of the areas of
shortcomings in the Report.
7. Only one (1) resubmission is allowed. If the Applicant does not re-submit the Technical
Report within the stipulated time and without valid reasons, the application will be
considered cancelled and IEM will not refund the fee related to the professional interview.
‘Appeal will not be entertained unless it is supported by valid reasons.
not
8. The content of the Report must be technical in nature. A pure management study
acceptable. The scope of the Report shall depend upon the Applicant’s academic
/professional qualifications and practical training, experience and achievement.
Page | of 49.
Me
12.
TEM PI A600
A, THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
(eases Guidance Notes for Technical Report
‘April 2015
[Applicant cen write the Technical Report basing on the work(s) or project(s) Fom the
[Applicant's Training & Experience Report Portfolio of Evidence Form) or career history
that best demonstrates Competency Categories A and B. This should typically represent
the engineering project or work erea where the Candidate has gained substantive technical
expertise.
‘The Technical Report should typically have 4,000 -- 6,000 words, excluding appendices
and attachments. It should describe particular project(s) or work(s) (or part thereof) in
which the Applicant played a major past, including taking the lead in some or all of the
elements. Applicant must indicate clearly his role in the development and management of
the project(s) or work(s) by giving the background to the important decisions for which he
vas responsible or to which he made a significant contribution. Above all Applicant mast
show where he has exercised independent engineering and professional ju
ent.
Numerical analyses, cost data, drawings or other relevant additional documentation should
be included as appropriate to support solutions / decisions described in the Report. Any
appendices or attachments are not included in the word-count, but they should be bound
into the Report.
While the Report may include or be largely based upon technical reports or design studies
or research works written as part of the Applicant's normal employment, it must include a
commentary identi
ing the contribution the reported work hes made to the Applicant's
techni
1 formation and highlighting where and how engineering principles have been
applied to solve problems.
‘The Technical Report should be submitted with supporting sheets, caleulations, tables.
charts, diagrams andior drawings duly certified. It may include one or more of the
following
13.1. Design work
13.2. Feasibility study
13.3. Research and development work
13.4. Operations and maintenance work
13.5. Other engineering work
Page 2 of 4TEM PI A600
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
Guidance Notes for Technical Report
‘April 2015
a
14, Report on design work shalll include the following:
14.
142.
143.
144.
At least wo (2) but not more than four (4) working drawings (to appropriate
readable scale that is accepted as the norm in the Applicant’s engineering
discipline / expertise area); and
Detailed design / engineering analysis and calculations relating to one or more of
the Applicant's own submitted drawings. Computer aided analysis and design
output shall be accompanied by “hand calculation” that forms part of the
verification process. For novel design (including front end engineering design),
this can be interpreted as field application leading to validation of work: and
Specifications to which candidate has contributed or executed in the course of
design or filed work: and
Bill of Quantities, cost /economic analysis as appropriate. Bill of Quantities
should comprise abstract and take-off sheets relating either to one or more of the
submitted drawings, whether or not prepared by the Candidate.
Report on feasibility study shall include the following items :
15.1
15.2,
153.
15.4.
15.5.
156.
15.7.
15.8.
At least one relevant drawing that conveys essential features and details of an
engineering system;
At Ieest three sketches that contain suificient details to enable a draughts person to
work them up into conceptual tender/bid drawings without further guidance;
Preliminary stress, system or other pertinent analysis;
Bill of Quantities, cost /economic analysis as appropriate;
Specifications to which candidate has contributed for subsequent design and field
execution.
As well as one or more of the following items as a part of the study:
Funet
nal and economic comparison of preliminary designs of an engineering
system;
A comprehensive report of a major engineering project;
A system design of a major engineering work.
Page 3 of 416.
17.
18.
19.
TEM PI A600
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
Guidance Notes for Technical Report
‘April 2015
Report on research and development work shall include:
16.1, Description of the R&D work detailing the planning, execution (methodology)
and deliverables of the work that clearly demonstrate sound application of
engineering principles;
16.2. Details of progressive pilot or prototyping work from computer and/or laboratory
models shall also be submitted;
16.3. The work actually carried out by the Applicant, appended with any engineering
document including drawings produced by him/her;
16.4. A critical appraisal of the desi
on any research experiments or systems which
may or may not be the work of the Applicant may be included.
Report on operations and maintenance work shal include +
TT. A detailed description of the operations of the plant or system together with the
maintenance schedule, which the Applicant has formulated or designed
17.2. In the submission, the Applicant should clearly indicate his contribution which
would demonstrate a sound understanding of the engineering principles and their
application;
173. Acritical appraisal ofthe design of the engineering system which may or may not
be the work of the Applicant should be included;
17 Details of modifications made to the existing system which are the work of the
Applicant should also be submitted.
Every drawing and document (supporting sheet, calculation, table, chart, and diagram)
wherever relevant is to be intialed/signed by the Supporter or Mentor who must also
certify that these are the works of the Applicant. If only @ portion of the Documents has
been prepared by the Applicant, this must be clearly indicated and certified.
{tis essential that the drawings and document submitted shall be the work of the Applicant
jn the ordinary course of his permanenticontractual (long term) employment
The Technical Report should be comprehensive, clear and concise; enough to give
sufficient evidence of the Applicant's personal technical contribution to the engineering
work(s) or project(s). Applicant should intialsign on every page of the Report
Page 4 of 4TEM PI A800
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSTA
Guidance Notes on Inquiry Form for Supporters
April 2015
These guidance notes are intended for the Supporters who have given consent to support
the Applicant (Intending Candidate) in his application to sit for IEM Professional
Interview.
Supporters ate asked to give brief comments in the Inquiry Form to show how, in their
opinion; the Applicant has demonstrated evidence against the statements shown below.
21. A~Knowledge and Understanding of Engineering Principles
Use a combination of general and specialist engineering knowledge and
understanding to optimise the application of existing and emerging technology
B - Practical Application of Engineering Skills
Apply appropriate theoretical and practical methods to the analysis and solution of
engineering problems
23. C= Leadership, Management, Supervision and Personal Responsibility
Provide technical and commercial leadership
2.4. D- Interpersonal Skills
Demonstrate effective interpersonal skills
2.5. E—Professionalism
Demonstrate a personal commitment to professional standards, recognising
obligations to society, the profession and the environment
‘The Supporters are typically the Supervising Engineers or Mentors who are Professional
Engineers or Corporate Members of IEM (MIEM). Please refer to the definition and role
of Supporters below.
Definition & Role of Supporters
4.1. Supporter refers to Professional Engineer registered with the Board of Engineers,
Malaysia (BEM), who is a Member or Fellow of {EM; or Engineering Council
(UK) registered engineer, who is a Member or Fellow of the respective institution;
or another professional engineering organisation of equivalent standing
(registrable with BEM as Professional Engineer), working at a senior level to the
candidate, preferably for at least two years, and with direct knowledge of the
Applicant's work, role and responsibilities.
4.2. Where a MIEM/PE or its equivalent that has direct knowledge of the Applicant is
not available, the current line manager, ot employer in a higher organisational
hierarchy, may act as Supporter, provided they are MIEM/PE or equivalent.
Page 1 of 244.
46,
TEM PI A800
THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA
Guidance Notes on Inquiry Form for Supporters
April 2015
At least one of the Supporters must be of the same engineering discipline and
from the same organisation as the candidate.
For Applicant who does not have a MIEM/PE of same discipline within the
organization, the Applicant can opt for a mentorship ot log-book scheme.
4.4.1. Nominate a mentor, who is typically a MIEM/PE of same discipline from
another organization (preferably same industry BUT not mandatory);
request the mentor to register with JEM under the mentorship or log-book
scheme.
4.4.2. Arrange a mentor with IEM from a pool of MIEM/PE who is willing to
help.
‘The third Supporter signature is optional and may be necessary, for example, if
the Applicant works on long-term contracts, as an additional signature to enable
adequate verification of periods for his employment.
One of the Supporters can serve as the lead Supporter who can help the Applicant
in the process of PI application, including the advises on filling up the PI
Application Form, presenting the Portfolio of Evidence Form, preparing for the
actual Interview, ete.
‘The completed forms should be retumed to :
2
‘The Applicant; or
The following address:
Professional Interview Board
The Institution of Engineers. Malaysia (IEM)
Bangunan Ingenieur
Lots 60/62, Jalan 52/4, Peti Surat 223 (Jalan Sultan)
46720 Petaling Jaya
Selangor Darul Ehsan
Malaysia
Email: see@iem.org.my
Page 2 of 2TEM PI A900
iGINEERS, MALAYSIA
Letters to Supporters
April 2015
THE INSTITUTION OF E!
Dear Sir/Madam,
Inquiry Form for IEM Professional Interview
enclose an Inquiry Form for a candidate applying for Professional Interview with the IEM,
who has given your name as a Supporter.
“The Candidate’s details should already have been completed on Section 1 of the form. You
are asked to complete sections 2, 3 and 4, giving examples where possible.
Guidance notes are included but if you require additional information please contact us on 03-
79684013/4007/4008.
Once completed please either email a scanned copy (with original signature) to 1EM
Secretariat, seo@iem.org.my of tothe address below or pass to the candidate to return it to ws.
Professional Interview Board
‘The Institution of Engineers, Malaysia (IEM)
Bangunan Ingenieur
Lots 60/62, Jalan 52/4, Peti Surat 223 (Jalan Sultan)
46720 Petaling Jaya
Selangor Darul Ehsan
Malaysia.
Itwould be appreciated if this form could be retuned to the IEM within 21 days of receipt to
prevent delays in the processing of the application.
Yours sincerely
Hon, Secretary
‘The Institution of Engineers, Malaysia (IEM)
Page | of |