Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bacteremia, A Result From Oral Irrigation in Subjects With Gingivitis
Bacteremia, A Result From Oral Irrigation in Subjects With Gingivitis
whether or not oral irrigation devices produce injury was determined by the following criteria:
to the crevicular epithelium. O'Leary, Swenson, Schafer, a. There was slight hemorrhage from the papil-
and Nesler found carbon particles in the sulcular epi-
18
injury when an oral irrigation device was used by pa- 4. Their venous system was accessible from both the
tients treated surgically and nonsurgically for perio- right and left antecubital fossae.
dontal disease. Krajewski, Rubach, and P o p e re- 22
5. They had no residual antibiotics in their system
ported that an oral irrigation device had no adverse from a previous administration.
effect on clinically noninflamed crevicular epithelium 6. They had not used an oral irrigation device pre-
even at maximum pressures. There was slight con- viously.
nective tissue hemorrhage apical to the base of the
crevicular epithelium. Hoover and Robinson found no
23 7. They were free of cardiovascular problems.
clinically observable tissue injury in a 90-day study of The patients were required to remain quiet for at
39 patients who had periodontal disease. Crumley and least 15 minutes prior to the beginning of the proce-
Sumner reported no clinical or histological tissue in-
24
with untreated generalized periodontitis developed specimens were taken from one arm and the control
specimens were taken from the other.
A thesis submitted by the senior author to the Graduate Prior to using the oral irrigator, 10 cc of blood was
School of The Ohio State University as partial fulfillment of withdrawn from one arm. The syringe used was a
the requirements for a Master of Science Degree, 1970. sterile, disposable, Becton-Dickinson # 8 1 0 L / S with a
*Formerly a graduate student in the Department of Perio- sterile, disposable, 1½ inch, 21 gauge, T O M A C cart-
dontology, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, ridge P A K needle. This control specimen determined
Columbus, Ohio; presently in St. Petersburg, Florida. the presence or absence of preoperative bacteremia.
** Professor Chairman and Graduate Director, Department of
Periodontology, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State Univer- * Water Pik: A registered trade mark name of Aqua Tec, A
sity, Columbus, Ohio. Teledyne Company.
757
758 Romans and App J. Periodont.
December, 1971
In order that the test sample might be withdrawn one incubated at 37°C on blood agar plates. The inoculum
minute after the use of the oral irrigator, the arm to be cultured with brain-heart infusion broth was subcul-
punctured was cleansed as described and wrapped in a tured aerobically. The inoculum cultured with thio-
sterile towel before the oral irrigation. The towel com- glycollate broth was subcultured anaerobically.
pletely encircled the arm at the elbow and was taped
in place. A #70304 Gas P A K Disposable Hydrogen and
Carbon Dioxide Generator was used to produce anaero-
A pilot study had shown that the use of the sterile bic conditions. A B B L anaerobic indicator was used
32
towel wrap was adequate to maintain the cleanliness of to determine the effectiveness of the anaerobic gen-
the antecubital fossa. erator.
Antibiotics have decreased the role of streptococci sons with untreated, generalized, moderate periodon-
as an etiological agent in bacterial endocarditis. A t one titis who used an oral irrigation device to be 50 per-
time streptococci were implicated in as much as 80 cent. In the present study the subjects had less severely
percent of all cases. N o w this figure is about 40 to 50 inflamed gingiva. The total area of ulcerated, weakened
percent, and staphylococci and gram negative rods 5
crevicular wall was presumably less in the generalized
have assumed an increasing role as etiologic agents. 14
papillary gingivitis present in this study than in general-
In this study, a staphylococcus and a gram positive rod ized moderate periodontitis present in the subjects of
were isolated. Felix's study. The possibility of causing crevicular
hemorrhage with a pressurized stream of water is the-
Cardiovascular defects which predispose a person to
oretically less in papillary gingivitis than in moderate
bacterial endocarditis are rheumatic heart disease, ar-
periodontitis considering both were generalized condi-
teriosclerotic heart disease, septal defects, injured
tions.
valves, prosthetic valves, and scarring from cardiac
surgery. ' 5
Healthy valves also may be affected by
1 1
bacterial endocarditis. 5, 3 6
S U M M A R Y AND CONCLUSION
lous in oral hygiene so that the periodontium remains 19. Arnim, S. S.: Dental Irrigators for Oral Hygiene,
healthy. Periodontal Therapy and Prevention of Dental Disease. J.
Tenn. Dent. Assn., 47:65,1967.
Further investigation is needed into the use of oral 20. Sumner, C : Paper presented at a meeting of the
irrigation devices utilizing higher water pressures than American Academy of Periodontology, Las Vegas, Nov.,
1965.
used in current studies and subjects with healthy perio- 21. Krajewski, J., Giblink, J. and Gargiulo, A . : Evalua-
dontium. tion of a Water Pressure Cleaning Device as an Adjunct to
Periodontal Treatment. J. Amer. Soc. of Periodont., 2:76,
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1964.
1. Hopkins, J. A . : Streptococcus Viridans: Bacteremia 22. Krajewski, J. L . , Rubach, W. C , and Pope, J. W.:
Following Extraction of Teeth. J. Amer. Dent. Assn., 26: The Effect of Water Pressure Cleansing on the Clinically
2002,1939. Normal Gingival Crevice. J. Calif. Dent. Assn., 43:452,
2. Geiger, A . J.: Relation of Fatal Subacute Bacterial Oct., 1967.
Endocarditis to Tooth Extraction. J. Amer. Dent. Assn., 29: 23. Hoover, D . R. and Robinson, H . B. G . : The Com-
1023, 1942. parative Effectiveness of the Water Pik in a Non-instructed
3. Ruston, M . A . : Subacute Bacterial Endocarditis Fol- Population. J. Periodont., 39:43,1968.
lowing the Removal of Teeth and Tonsils. Guy's Hos. Rep., 24. Crumley, P. J. and Sumner, C. F.: Effectiveness of a
80:391,1930. Water Pressure Cleansing Device. J. Amer. Soc. of Perio-
4. Morgan, W. L . and Bland, E. F.: Bacterial Endo- dont, 3:193, 1965.
carditis in A n Antibiotic Era. Circulation, 19:753, 1959. 25. Khairat, O.: The Non-aerobis of Post Extraction
5. Robbins, S. L . : Pathology, ed. 3 Philadelphia, W. B. Bacteremia. J. Dent. Res., 45:1191, 1966.
Saunders Co., 1967. 26. Glickman, I.: Clinical Periodontology, ed. Phila-
6. Bender, I. B. and Pressman, R. S.: Factors in Dental delphia & London, W. B. Saunders Co., 1964.
Bacteremia. J. Amer. Dent. Assn., 32:836, 1945. 27. Stallard, R.: National Consultant, U . S. A i r Force,
7. Friedman, M . , Katz, L . N . and Howell, K . : Experi- Wright Patterson A F B , Periodontal Postgraduate Seminar,
mental Endocarditis Due to Streptococcus Viridans. Arch, May, 1969.
of Int. Med., 6:95, 1938. 28. Korn, N . A . and Schaffer, E . M . : A Comparison of
8. Lanansky, J. P., Robinson, L . and Rodofsky, L.: Fac- Post-operative Bacteremias Induced Following Different
tors Influencing the Incidence of Bacteremias Following Sur- Periodontal Procedures. J. of Periodont., 15:226, 1962.
gical Procedures in the Oral Cavity. J. Dent. Res., 28:533, 29. Brandt, C. L., Korn, N . A . and Schaffer, E . M . : Bac-
1959. teremia from Ultrasonics and Hand Instrumentation. J.
9. Muller, E . H . : Bacteremia after Tooth Extraction. Periodont, 32:214, 1964.
Dent. Abstr., 8:16, Jan., 1963. 30. Robinson, L . , Krause, F . W., Lazansky, J. P.,
10. Cooley, F. and Haberman, S.: The Use of Antibiotics Wheeler, R., Gordon, S. and Johnson, V . : Bacteremias of
for the Prevention of Bacteremia Following Oral Surgery. Dental Origin. II. A Study of Factors Influencing Occur-
J. Dent. Res., 36:294, 1957. rence and Detections. Oral Surg., 3:923, July, 1950.
11. Anderson, W. D . : Pathology, Vol. I, ed. 5 St. Louis, 31. MacPherson, C. R. and Kimbleton, E . S.: A n Eco-
C. V . Mosby Co., 1968. nomical Closed Blood Culture System. Amer. J. Med.
12. Cobe, H . M . : Transitory Bacteremia. Oral Surg., Tech., July-Aug., 1965.
7:609, 1954. 32. Wilson, G . S. and Miles, A . A . : Topley and Wilson's
13. Murray, M . and Moosnick, F.: Incidence of Bacte- Principles of Bact. and Immunity, Vol. 1. Baltimore, Wil-
remia in Patients with Dental Disease. J. Lab. and Clinical liams and Wilkins Co., 1964.
Med., 26:801, Feb., 1941. 33. Bergey's Manual of Determinate Bacteriology, ed. 7
14. Conner, H . D., Haberman, S., Collings, C. K . and Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins Co., 1957.
Winford, T.: Bacteremias Following Periodontal Scaling in 34. Loe, H , Theilade, E . and Jensen, S.: Experimental
Patients with Healthy Appearing Gingivae. J. Periodont., Gingivitis in Man. J. Periodont, 36:177, 1965.
38:466,1967. 35. Mandel, L : Dental Plaque: Nature, Formation, and
15. Winslow, M . B. and Millstone, S. H . : Bacteremia Effects. J. Periodont, 37:357,1966.
after Prophylaxis II. J. Periodont, 36:371, 1965. 36. Angrist, A . A . and Masamichi, O.: Pathogenesis of
16. Wada, K . , Tomizawa, M . and Sasaki, I.: Study on Bacterial Endocarditis. Dent. Abstr., 8:719, 1963.
Bacteremia in Patients of Pyorrhea Alveolaris Caused by 37. Grant, D . , Stern, I. and Everett, F.: Orban's Perio-
Surgical Operations. J. Nihon University School of Den- dontics, ed. 3. St. Louis, C. V . Mosby Co., 1968.
tisty, 10:52, June, 1968. 38. Goldman, H . and Cohen, D . : Periodontal Therapy,
17. Felix, J. E.: Detection of Transient Bacteremia After ed. 4 St. Louis, C. V . Mosby Co., 1968.
the Use of an Oral Irrigation Device, Master's Thesis, The 39. Bull. Eighth Dist. Dent. Soc., New York, 3:10, D e c ,
Ohio State University, 1969. 1969.
18. O'Leary, T. M . , Swenson, H . M . , Schafer, W. S., 40. Diener, J.: Bacteremia and Oral Sepsis, with Particu-
Nesler, D . M . : Penetration of Fluid from Oral Irrigating lar Reference to the Possible Reduction of Systemic Disease
Devices into the Gingival Crevice and Crevicular Tissue. Originating from the Oral Cavity. J. Periodont., 35:236,
I A D R Abs., 47th General Meeting, p. 87, 1969. 1964.