DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM for CY 2021

(Curriculum &Instructional Development)

I, Jean C. Afable commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures
for the period July – December, 2021

JEAN C. AFABLE, MBIO

Head, Curriculum & Instructional Development

Agreed with: Approved:

SHOVEN M. AFABLE GERONIMO A. ELLADO, Ph. D

PMT Campus Administrator

Output Performance Indicators Performance Actual Accomplishment Rating Weight Weighte Remarks

ESSU–IPDO–110 | Version 4 Page 1 of 5

Effective: July 12, 2021
 (base on OOM) Target d Rating
Core Functions - Review, formulate and -Reviewed and implemented plans
implement plans in the in the development and evaluations
- Review, formulate development and of modules.
and implement plans in the evaluation of Curriculum -Served as Chairman in the
development and and Instructional Institutional Instructional Material
evaluation of Curriculum Materials Development. Committee of the Campus.
and Instructional Materials - Serve as Chairman of -Prepared and submitted reports
Development the Institutional
Instructional Material
Committee of the
Campus.
- Lead in the Planning,
development and
evaluation of
instructional materials in
the campus.
- Prepare and submit
reports when necessary.
-

90% Accurateness 4.0 .60 2.4

ESSU–IPDO–110 | Version 4 Page 2 of 5

Effective: July 12, 2021
 -

Weighted Rating for Core Functions 2.4

Support Functions -Prepare request for the
procurement of goods Prepared the request for the
- Prepare and submit for printing and procurement of goods for printing
reports when publication of GE and publication
necessary modules.
For at least 90% 4.0 0.20 0.8
Truthfulness

ESSU–IPDO–110 | Version 4 Page 3 of 5

Effective: July 12, 2021
 Weighted Rating for Support Functions 0.8

Strategic Priorities

Conduct seminars,
lectures in the curriculum
and instructional
- Conduct seminars, materials development
lectures in the curriculum - Keep records of
and instructional important activities
materials development related to curriculum and
instructional materials 90% Intent Attended webinars on Curriculum
development. Development

3.8 0.20 0.76

Weighted Rating for Strategic Priorities 0.76

RATING COMPUTATION      
Category Rating Weight Total (Rating x Weight) Remarks and Recommendations:
Core Function 4.0 60% 2.4  
Support Function 4.0 20% 0.8  
Strategic Priority 3.8 20% 0.76  
Total Overall Rating 3.96  100%  
Final Average Rating 3.96   3.96  
Adjectival Rating Satisfactory   Satisfactory      

ESSU–IPDO–110 | Version 4 Page 4 of 5

Effective: July 12, 2021
Discussed with: Assessed/Rated by: Reviewed by PMT Chair Approved:
I certify that I discussed my assessment
of the performance with the employee

JEAN C.AFABLE GERONIMO A. ELLADO, Ph. D SHOVEN M. AFABLE GERONIMO A. ELLADO, Ph. D
Ratee Immediate Supervisor PMT Campus Administrator

ESSU–IPDO–110 | Version 4 Page 5 of 5

Effective: July 12, 2021