Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Biodegradation of Cellulosic Materials: Substrates, Microorganisms, Enzymes and Products
Biodegradation of Cellulosic Materials: Substrates, Microorganisms, Enzymes and Products
substrates, microorganisms,
enzymes and products
VIRENDRA S. B I S A R I A a n d T A R U N K. G H O S E
Summary. Cellulosic materials are the only renewable Table 2 Potential availability of some agricultural residues
( 1 9 7 8 - 7 9 ) in India 2 4
resources available in large quantities which need to be
properly utilized to meet our needs o f energy, chemicals, Residues Availability (million tons)
food and feed for a long-range solution. A variety o f
lignocellulosic materials are available and microorganisms Rice husk 18.0
capable o f degrading either one or more o f the three main Rice bran 3.2
Rice straw 59.2
constituents, viz. cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin have
Bagasse 52.1
been studied. A t least three different enzymes o f the multi- Jute sticks 2.5
component cellulase system, i.e. cellobiohydrolase Cotton stal ks 12.0
endo-glueanase and (J-glucosidase are involved in the Cotton linters 1.2
degradation o f erystalline cellulose into glucose. Their Wood wastes 5.5
Coconut shell/coir dust 0.6
mode of a c t i o n and the manner in which they bring about
hydrolysis o f crystalline cellulose is discussed in detail. The
Table 3 Estimates of energy yields from crops s
involvement o f parallel enzymes for hemicellulose degrada-
tion is also known to some extent but needs to be studied Oven-dried Mega joules
more elaborately, independently and in combination with (tons/ha) (gross/ha)
cellulases. The potential o f cellulosic biomass as a source o f
Pasture 10.8 204 120
fuel and petroleum-sparing substances is also reviewed.
Lucerne 11 200 200
Winter green crop 20 36 200
Maize (grain) 8 164 700
Peas 4.4 83 500
Introduction Fodder beet 20 354 000
Sugar beet 9.6 168 960
It is being increasingly realized that, given the growth rate Gorse 10.6 196 100
of population and the stock of accessible reserves of coal, Oat straw 6.3 112 770
gas and oil, it will be impossible to provide as much energy Wheat straw 5.7 98 940
to the world economy towards the end of the present
century as is going to be demanded. Nuclear energy may
provide a solution but its use is always associated with understood and mastered for their optimal use. Biomass in
possible dangers of radioactivity and not everybody is the form of agricultural and forest wastes accumulates
enthusiastic about it. Bioenergy technologies, on the other every year in large quantities, resulting in a deterioration of
hand, are examples of what Lovins 1 calls 'soft energy paths', the environment and a loss of potentially valuable resources.
in spite of their own intrinsic complexities, which must be Some of the potential biodegradable agricultural and agro-
industrial residues and their availability in India are given in
Tables 1 and 2. All these represent energy-rich resources of
Table 1 Some potential agricultural and agro-industrial cellulosic
residues cellulosic biomass; the estimates of energy yield for some
crops have been computed (Table 3). The biological con-
By-products version of these residues into feed and fuel can be a practical
solution to the above-mentioned problems. According to
Crop Rice straw, wheat straw, maize stal k,
castor stem, tapioca stem, banana
one estimate, 6 the annual net yield of photosynthesis is
stem, coconut stem, cotton stick, 1.8 x 1012 tons of biological substances. If only a fraction
corn cobs, bamboo dust of these materials is to be converted into fuel, gas and feed
Agro-industrial protein, a significant contribution could be made to the
Rice-milling industry Rice husk, rice bran
overall problem of resource recycle and conservation.
Sugar industry Bagasse, molasses, pressmud
Cotton ginning industry Cotton tinters, cotton seed hull, Biomass in the form of cellulose, hemicellulose and
cotton gin waste lignin provides a means of collecting and storing solar
Jute industry Jute sticks, jute mill waste energy and hence represents an important energy and
Sawmill industry Sawdust material resource. However, before using this resource, it is
Coconut industry Coconut husk, shell and pith
necessary to convert it into a usable form, such as a gaseous
~4) /9 [ Xylp-(l~4)-
/9 D- Xylp-(V--~4) - ,~ - o - X y l p - ( l - - ~ 4 ) - B-D- X y l p - (I --P'
3 5
I I
a - L - Araf e - u - GlcpA
L-Arobino-D-Glucurono- P-xylan (gross) (E)
A~etyl
3r
---D'4) - /9 D -Xytp-(t-P"4}- /9 D- Xylp-(I---4"4) /9 D - Xylp- ( 1 ~ 4 ) - /9- l)- Xylp- (I-~
2 2
t
I
~
I
a D GIcpA ~ - o -GIcpA
D-Glucurono- D-xylan (wood) (]:E)
Figure 1 Structure of some c o m m o n l y occurring hemicelluloses. ~9 Araf = arabinofuranose, Xylp = Xylopyranoside, Glcp A = glucopyranosyI-
uronide
H20H OH
i
H C ~ O [CH20H ]
HC
CH OH
2
~OCH
HCO - -
~ 0
OCH3
CH
HCO--
~ OCH3
H2COH
CHj "1"
CHO .OH _ _
HCOH
HC~--O
--0
/o\/
0 CH
CH3 0 CH OH OCH3 H2i CH
I 2
HCOH
HC-- 0 HOC,H2 HC - - CH
I HO~
HCOH /#~/L- CH
HE ~ o / C H 2
~H20H I OCH3
0
CH ~ HCO~
CH3d" OCH3 ( ~ O C H
3
H C - - O
HCOH
HC 0
.~ OCH3
CH30 IH20H H21 OH
0 CH HC -0
HCOH C~-----O
OH OH
F i g u r e 2 Schematic formula for a section o f spruce lignin consisting of 16 units ~2'13
The bonds at the folds are supposedly the major weak Table 5 A c t i v a t i o n energy o f cellulase enzymes (T. reesei) in
degrading different cellulose structures 21
links and are mainly responsible for chemically induced
chain scission. On solvent pretreatment, the width of the Cellulose structure f o r m A c t i v a t i o n energy
crystallite is increased due to swelling as well, as the fold used to produce enzyme on structure f o r m
length decreases to D P ~ 30 (ref. 20; see Figure 3). It has (cal gmol -l K -l)
been established that pretreatment with the solvent does I II
not cause an appreciable reduction in DP of the original
cellulose. Taking this fact into account, a decrease in fold Form I 3270 6940
length is only possible if the number of folds per molecule Form II 6190 5430
increases. Since solvent pretreatment increases the number
of folds per molecule, it is expected to enhance the hydro-
lysis rate, as observed experimentally. Moreover, the
Microorganisms involved in cellulose, h e m i c e l l u l o s e
swelling accompanying the solvent pretreatment makes the
and lignin-degrading e n z y m e s
folds within the crystallite more accessible to acids or
enzymes. Thus, the folding chain model for the crystallite The availability of high activity cellulase is the basis for a
structure of cellulose can explain the observed enhance- successful process for the enzymatic conversion of cellulose.
ment of the rate of cellulose hydrolysis on solvent Although many fungi and bacteria degrade cellulose, the
pretreatment. products of growth are microbial cells and metabolic
King and Vessa121 cultivated T. reesei on cellulose products such as carbon dioxide and methane. Only a few
preparation of four crystal forms and then determined the fungi, such as Trichoderma reesei (formerly called T.
activation energies for the reaction of the enzymes pro- viride22), 23-29 Trichoderma koningii, 30-33 T. lignorum, 34
duced on each substrate during its activity on all four Sporotrichum pulverulentum (formerly called Chrysosporum
substrates. The results showed that this organism produced lignorum), 3s Penicillium funiculosum, 36'37 P. iriensis, 38
enzymes that required minimum activation energy for Aspergillus wentii, 39'4° Po lyporus adustus, 4] Fusarium
hydrolysis of the specific substrata on which it was culti- solani, 42 F. lini, 43 Sclerotium rolfsii, 44'45 Eupenicillium
vated (Table 5). The results were remarkable because they javanicum, 46 Schizophyllum commune 47 and a few bacteria
indicated that the enzyme synthesizing machinery of this such as Clostridium thermocellum, 48-s° Thermomono-
fungus can adapt to the structure of the active site of the spora sp., sl Cellulomonas sp., 52'53 and Streptomyces
enzyme so as to accommodate a specific crystal lattice flavogriseus s4, are known for their ability to produce high
structure in its substrate. activity cellulase capable of extensively degrading insoluble
cellulose to soluble sugars in vitro. In addition, there are
many organisms that produce cellulase preparations which
dk
degrade only soluble cellulose derivatives such as carboxy-
methyl cellulose (CMC) while a few organisms produce very
little residual cellulase of any type of despite their active
growth on insoluble cellulose, zs This is due to the fact that
ii
have been found to be associated with cellulases in enzyme Table 6 Cellulase and hemicellulase assays
preparations of fungal origin. 66'67
Enzyme Substrate(s) Product(s)
Lignin-degrading microorganisms are also found among
both fungi and bacteria. Soft-rot fungi 68-70 belonging to Cellobiase Cellobiose Glucose
species of Paecilomyces, Allescheria, Preussia, Chaetomium Cellodextrins
and Stachybotrys, brown-rot fungi 68'71'72 such as Poria Xylobiase Xylobiose Xylose
monticola, P. cocos and Lenzites trabea, and white-rot Xylodextrins
Aryl-Ct-glucosidase/ o-Nitrophenyl o-Nitrophenol
fungi 73-77 belonging to species of Coriolus versicolor, /3-glucosidase /3-glucoside
Polyporus anceps, Phanerochaete chrysosporiurn, Sporo- Salicin Saligenin
trichurn pulverulenlurn, Aspergillus fumigatus, Polyporous /3-Xylosidase o-Nitrophenyl o-Nitrophenol
versicolor, P. hirsutus, Poria subacida, Polyporus abientinus, /3-xylopyranoside
Exo-13(1-~ 4)-glucanase
Gleoporus dichrous and Lentinus edodes have been found Cellobiohydrolase Crystalline cellulose Cellobiose
to have capacity to degrade lignin to varying degrees. (CBH, C 1) (cotton)
Bacteria capable of degrading lignin or lignin related Avicel
phenolic compounds include species of Nocardia, Strepto- Cellodextrins
Glucohydrolase Crystalline cellulose Glucose
myces, Pseudomonas, Flavobacterium, A erornonas, Bacillus, (cotton)
Agrobacterium and Xanthomonas. 78-82 Some detailed Avicel
reviews discussing the lignin decomposing groups of wood Cellodextrins
decay fungi and mechanisms of its microbial degradation Endo-~3(1 ~ 4)- CM-cellulose Reducing sugars,
have appeared. 68'69'83'84 The lignin model compounds glucanase (Cx) HE-cellulose and/or loss in
Amorphous cellulose viscosity
have been used for the study of lignin biodegradation. It 'Cellulase' (FPase, Filter paper (FP) Reducing sugars/
has been observed that microorganisms having the capacity Avicelase, Avicel loss in weight/
to degrade these model compounds often do not degrade hydrocellulase) Hydrocellulose reduction in
the lignin macromolecule; however, known lignin degraders Cellodextrins absorbance
Other cellulase assay
generally decompose lignin models. Swelling factor Cotton Uptake of alkali
Cellulase Dyed cellulose Release of dye
Thread Breaking strength
Assays and fractionation of enzymes Hemicellulases
One of the main difficulties with the assay of cellulolytic Xylanase Xylan Xylose/reducing
enzymes is the choice of suitable substrates. Although there Glucuronoxylan sugars
Arabinoxylan
is no doubt that pure cellulose is composed of very long
Mannanase Poly (galactomannan) Reducing sugars
chains of/3(1-+ 4)-glucose units, there is still much contro-
versy on how these chains are arranged in the microflbril
and how the latter, in turn, form the cellulose fibres found scientific research, and this seems to be missing in the area
in woody materials and which constitute cotton. The of cellulase research.
question as to whether regions of less well ordered cellulose From the preceding discussion, it is clear that if one
chains exist in the micro fibril is of fundamental importance wishes to discover all the different cellulolytic components
and is yet to be clarified. Moreover, cellulose samples of in a culture fluid, several different substrates are required.
different origin vary widely in chain length and the degree Another factor which renders the cellulase fractionation
of interaction between the chains. Cellulase is a complex of difficult is that the cellulase enzymes are nearly always
enzymes containing mainly exo-glucanases and endo- present as isoenzymes. These isoenzymes often differ only
glucanases, plus cellobiase. For the complete hydrolysis of slightly in isoelectric pH and are therefore difficult to
insoluble cellulose, a synergistic action between these separate. It is also not very certain whether the components
components is required. Since different cellulase prepara- resolved, for instance, by isoelectric focusing actually
tions vary widely in the proportions of the different com- represent species of the same type of enzymes, or if they
ponents, depending on source, growth conditions and differ in specificity.
harvesting and handling procedures, the rate and extent of Before describing the fractionation procedures used for
their hydrolysis of cellulose substrates also vary widely. isolating cellulase enzyme components, it is important to
Assay of cellulase components requires a variety of fairly mention briefly the components present in the multi-
complicated procedures. Native cellulose fibres such as membered cellulase enzyme system. The most acceptable
cotton are unsuitable since their rate of hydrolysis is very trend is to consider the cellulase system as follows.
low. Moreover, some cellulases do not have a readily deter- (i) Endo-/3(1-+4)-glucan glucanases (the Cx enzymes as
minable effect on crystalline cellulose. referred to by Reese) are present in several components
Commercial cellulose preparations such as microcrystal- varying in degree of randomness. One of these may be the
line Avicel are more rapidly hydrolysed but are nearly as enzyme that acts first on crystalline or highly ordered cellulose
poorly defined as cotton fibres. The most convenient sub- (ii) Exo-/3(1-+4)-glucanases are present in two major
strates are carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and hydroxy- forms: (a)/3(1 -~ 4)-glucan cellobiohydrolase (CBH) removing
ethylcellulose (HEC). CMC is rapidly hydrolysed but can cellobiose units from the non-reducing ends of the cellulose
not be used as an universal substrate since it is not attacked chain. This CBH is being currently equated with the old C1
by all the enzymes present in cellulolytic culture fluids. enzyme by many workers, (b)/3(1~ 4)-glucan glucohydro-
A cellooligosaccharide such as cellotetraose is attacked by lase, which removes glucose units from the non-reducing
all known types of cellulases but is rather difficult to prepare. end of the chain.
As a result, a bewildering array of substrates, enzyme actions, 0ii) Cellobiase,/3(1 -+ 4)-glucosidase, which converts
units and activities have been in use (Table 6), partly due to cellobiose and other cellodextrins into glucose.
the tendency of workers to develop their own assay pro- The most intensive fractionation studies have been
cedures. A rational nomenclature is a very valuable tool in carried out on cellulases elaborated by T. reesei, 85-89
T. koningii 30'31'90-92 and S. pulverulentum 41 using Xylanases have been purified from T. reesei, 4°'94 T.
standard protein separation techniques such as solvent roseum, 94 A. niger 9s and other fungi and bacteria 9'96'97
precipitation, ion-exchange chromatography, molecular by ammonium sulphate precipitation, gel filtration, ion
sieve chromatography and isoelectric focusing. The frac- exchange chromatography, hydroxyapatite chromato-
tionation schemes for the separation of different cellulase graphy and isoelectric focusing. Xylanases of the endo type
components from T. reesei and T. koningii are shown in [/3(1 -+ 4)-D-xylan xylanohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.8] are the only
Figures 4 and 5, respectively. It is clear from these Figures types that have been characterized. Although exo-xylanases
that all the components are present in multiple forms, often [/3(1-+ 4)-D-xylan xylohydrolase] have been found, literature
as isoenzymes. A comparison of cellulases from different on their purification and mode of action is not available, to
microorganisms with respect to certain characteristic the best of our knowledge. The molecular weights of endo-
protein parameters such as molecular weight, isoelectric pH xylanases have been found to lie between 16 000 and
and carbohydrate contents is given in Table 7. 39 000. 95 The isoelectric pH of xylanases purified from
It seems difficult to make any generalization about the different sources have also, like cellulases, been reported to
size of cellulase components. The most common range of be on the acidic side, between 3.9 and 4.5.
their molecular weights is probably 12 000 to 80 000. The The third component of the xylanase enzyme system, i.e.
smallest and largest molecular weights of endo-glucanases /3-xylosidase ~-D-xyloside xylohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.37),
have been reported to be 5300 and 145 000, respectively.88'93 which has a similar action to the/3-glucosidase component
/3-Glucosidases appear to have larger molecular weights than of the cellulase system, causes hydrolysis of/3(1~4) bonds
exo- and endo-glucanases; the largest molecular weight of at the non-reducing ends of xylooligosaccharides and
/3-glucosidase found so far is 400 000. 91 The isoelectric ~(1 ~ 4)-aryl xylopyranosides./3-Xylosidase, which is widely
points of all the components so far investigated have been distributed in microorganisms such as Aspergillus niger 98
found to be on the acidic side, pH < 6.3. The most common and Bacillus pumilus, 99 forms xylose from xylooligo-
range of isoelectric pH seems to be as follows: exo- saccharides produced by the action of endo- and exo-
glucanase, 3.7 to 4.3, endo-glucanase, 3.3 to 6.2 and xylanases on xylan. A 27-fold purification of/3-xylosidase
/3-glucosidase, 5.5 to 5.9. Further, the cellulase components has been reported in 19% yield from A. niger using dif-
may or may not be glycoproteins (Table 7). ferential ammonium sulphate precipitation and cation
Table 7 Characteristic protein parameters of cetlulase components isolated from different microorganisms
E n z y m e M i c r o b . T e c h n o l . , 1981, V o l . 3, A p r i l 95
Reviews
Crude cellulose
I
Molecular sieve chromatography ( 8io- gel P- I0 )
L
I I
Ion-exchangechromatography Ion- exchange
(DEAE-Sephadex A- 50) chromatography
(Arginine - Sepharose 6B )
I I
Ion- exchange chromatography Isoelectric focusing Isoelectric focusing
(SE- Sephodex C-50) (pH gradient 5.0-4.2) (pH gradient 4-5.2)
[
Biospecific chromatography
I
Isoelectric focusing
(Avicel) (pH gradient 5-7)
~
Isoelectric such as lignin. Hence, the enzymes which attack the lignin
focusing
ephodex macromolecule may be very different from those that
Purified Iow-mol wt Cx attack model compounds. 84 An alcohol oxidase, purified
Cx~ (pl= 4.73)
Cx+,8-glucosidese from the culture filtrate of Fusarium solani 1°° after growth
trace Cxz
on DHPs has been reported to non-specifically oxidize a
. ~ h o d e x CI + D ~ E - wide range of lignin model compounds containing a, fl-
Sephadex unsaturated primary alcohol structures (such as coniferyl
alcohol) and macromolecular structures of various lignin
Cx ,8-Glucosidase CIf ~ ~- Cx2
~, Cx5 preparations. Another enzyme, cellobiose-quinone oxido-
Isoelectric ] I Isoelectric focusing
reductase has been found to take part in both lignin and
focusing J (pH 37-4.3 cellulose degradation.]°lAlthough the absolute requirement
of phenol oxidases in lignin degradation has been estab-
lished, 1°2 its exact role is still to be elucidated.
Cx/ ~CCx4 L CI (pl 3.95) " C I (pl 3.8)
(pl 4.32) (pl 509)
r. ~ Isoelectrc focusing Mode of action of cellulases and hemicellulases
j ,8-Gluc°sidasel ~ (pH 4-6)
LSE-Sephadex (pl 5.55) The degradation of crystalline cellulose is a complex process
requiring the participation of many enzymes. Reese and his
cJ. 5 colleagues l°a first suggested a route for the conversion of
native cellulose to soluble sugars based on a two-step
Isoelectric focusing sequential process (Figure 6). The C 1 enzyme was envisaged
~ pH 5 - 7
to be a hydrolytic factor (a hydrogen bondase) producing
an 'activated' or 'modified' cellulose which, in turn, was
capable of being attacked by the hydrolytic, Cx, enzymes
,8-Glucosidase Cx5 of the cellulase enzyme system; the x in Cx reflects the
(pl585] (pl 6.28) multicomponent nature of the enzyme. According to these
Figure 5 Fractionation scheme for purification of different workers, microorganisms which grow on soluble cellulose
cellulolytie enzymes from T. k o n i n g i i 92 such as CMC synthesize only Cx components whereas
Crystalline CI ?
ce~Wose
Modified
~ cellu%se
f Cellobiohydrolase ~Cellobiose There are relatively very few reports on the mode of
action of hemicellulases. Basically, like cellulase, hemi-
cellulases also occur in two basic forms, i.e. exo-type and
Table 8 Solubilization of dewaxed cotton by reconstituted
Gluco-hydrolase/ cellobiose/
/3 qlucosidose mixtures of the components of cellulose complex of T. koningii 92
- - ~ Glucose
Figure 8 Reese's Modified Concept H= (1977) Enzyme Solubilization of cotton
(%)
but are capable of catalysing the hydrolysis of the products
C1 + Cxl 2
of C 1 action. 112
C t + Cx3 a 34
Though synergism between exo- and endo-glucanases is C 1 + Cx3 b 2
clearly established, the recent discovery 3a'92 that C1 (exo- C 1 + Cx4 51
glucanase) acts synergistically only with certain Cx (endo- C 1 + Cx . + CxA 4- 1 3<jlucosidase 53
glucanases) suggests the possibility that more crystalline C 1 + Cx1 Cx3 a 4- Cx3 b + Cx4 72
Unfractionated complex 71
areas are effectively solubilized only by rapid sequential
action of those exo- and endo-glucanases that are capable
Table 9 Degradation of cotton cellulose by cellulase preparations
of forming an enzyme-enzyme complex on the surface of
from different fungi 92'1~°
cellulosic chains. It was found by Wood and McCrae 92 that
out of the six endo-glucanases isolated from T. koningii Source of cellutase Cellulose degradation (% w t loss)
(Figure 5), the lowest molecular weight component, Cx,,
was most random in its action, i.e. it produced the largest 02 atmosphere N 2 atmosphere
changes in viscosity of CMC and in DP of HaPO4-swollen 21.5
S. pulverulen turn 52.1
cellulose. But this most randomly acting component, which P. adustus 42.6 18.0
should show the highest capacity for solubilizing cotton, in M. verrucaria 33.6 17.0
fact did not show any synergism with Ca enzyme (Table 8). T. reesei 20.0 10.0
7:. koningii 43.0 38.1
It has, therefore, been suggested by these workers that 43.0
P. funiculosum 42.9
extensive hydrolysis of highly ordered cellulose is accom- F. solani 34.1 34.6
plished only by those pairs of hydrolytic enzymes (C1 and
98 E n z y m e M i c r o b . T e c h n o l . , 1981, V o l . 3, A p r i l
Biodegradation of cellulosic materials: Virendra S. Bisaria and Tarun K. Ghose
Table 10 Effect of shaking and CO 2 on the enzymatic hydrolysis of Avicel cellulose after 70 h 114
Table 12 Screening methodologies for isolation of high yielding and catabolite repression resistant cellulase mutants T M
Total cellulase complex 1.5% oxgall + Phosphon 13 Acid-swollen 5% glycerol Clear zones after incubation at 50°C
cellulose
Endo-glucanase 1.5% oxgall + Phosphon El Carboxymethyl 5% glycerol or Clear zones after flooding with quaternary
cellulose 5% glucose ammonium compounds
(5'-Glucosidase (1) 1.5% oxgall + Phosphon D Esculin (0.1%) 5% glucose Black rings in the presence of ferric
ammonium citrate
(2) 1.5% oxgall + Phosphon D Cellobiose (1%) 0.2% 2-deoxy Large vs. pinpoint colonies
glucose
(3) 1.5% oxgall + Phosphon El Any of above 5% glycerol Overlay with Glucostat + cellobiose,
50°C, 30 min, red spot
Table 13 Some important cellulase producing organisms and increase in their yields through mutation
and other strains 4s have also been used for obtaining high Table 15 Rapid ethanol production from bagasse hydrolysate using
cellulase producing organisms and/or mutants. S. cerevisiae in batch and continuous cell recycle systems 145
E n z y m e M i c r o b . T e c h n o l . , 1981, V o l . 3, A p r i l 101
Reviews
20 Bose, A., presented at 2nd Int. Symp. Bioconv. Bioehem. 60 Kusakabe, I. J. Agrie. Chem. Soe. Jpn 1977, 51,429
Eng., HTDelhi March 3 - 6 , 1980 61 Dekker, R. F. H. and Linder, W. A. S. Afr. J. ScL 1979, 75,
21 King, K. W. and Vessal, M. I. Adv. Chem. Ser. 1969, 95, ch. 2 65
22 Simmons, E. G. inAbstr. 2nd Int. MycoL Congr. 1977, p. 618 62 Nakanishi, K. and Yasui, T. J. Ferment. Teehnol. 1980, 58 (2),
23 Mandels, M., Hontz, L. and Nystrom, J. BioteehnoL Bioeng. 171
1974, 16, 1471 63 Dekker, R. F. H. in Miscellaneous Papers, Agricultural
24 Berghem, L. E. R. and Pettersson, L. G. Eur. J. Biochem. University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1976, pp. 12, 43
1973, 37, 21 64 Comtat, J., Ruel, K., Joseleau, J. P. and Barnoud, F. in Proc.
25 Mandels, M. and Weber, J. Adv. Chem. Ser. 1969, 95,391 Symp. Enz. Hydrol. Cellulose (Bailey, M., Enari, T. M. and
26 GaUo, B. J, Andreotli, R. E., Roche, R., Ryu, D. and Mandels, Linko, M., eds), Aulanko, Finland, March 1975, p. 351
M. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. no. 8, 1978, p. 89 65 Ghosh, B. S. and Kundu, A. B.J. Kerment. Technol. 1980,
27 Toyama, N. and Ogawa, K. in Proc. 4th Int. Ferment. Symp. 58 (2), 135
(Terui, G., ed.), 1972, p. 743 66 Nisizawa, T., Suzuki, H. and Nisizawa, K. J. Biochem. 1971,
28 Ghose, T. K., Pathak, A. N. and Bisaria, V. S. inProc. Symp. 70, 387
Enz. Hydrol. Cellulose (Bailey, M., Enari, T. M. and Linko, M., 67 Eriksson, K. E. and Rzedowski, W. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
eds), Aulanko, Finland, March 1975, p. 11 l 1969, 129,689
29 Ryu, D. D. Y. and Mandels, M. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 68 Kirk, T. K.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1971, 9, 182
1980, 2, 91 69 Ander, P. and Eriksson, K. E. Prog. Ind. MicrobioL 1978, 14, 1
30 Wood, T. M. in Proc. 4th lnt. Ferment. Symp. (Terui, G., ed.) 70 Haider, K. and Trojanowski, J~lrch. Microbiol. 1975, 105, 33
1972, p. 711 71 Kirk, T. K. in Recent Progress in Wood Products Pathology
31 Wood, T. M. and McCrae, S. I. Biochem. J. 1972, 128, 1183 (Liese, W., ed.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975, p. 153
32 Halliwell, G. in Proc. Symp. Enz. HydroL Cellulose (Bailey, 72 Kirk, T. K., Connors, W. J., Bleam, R. D., Hackett, W. F. and
M., Enari, T. M. and Linko, M., eds) Aulanko, Finland, March Zeikus, J. G.Proc. NatL Acad. Sci. USA 1975, 72, 2515
1975,p. 319 73 Kirk, T. K. and Chang, H. M. Holzforschung 1975,29, 56
33 Wood, T. M. in Abstr. 6th Int. Ferment. Symp., London, 74 Kirk, T. K., Connors, W. J. and Zeikus, J. G. Appl. Environ.
Canada 1980, p. 87 Microbiol. 1976, 32,192
34 Eriksson, K. E. and Pettersson, B. in Biodeterioration o f 75 Drew, S. W. and Kadam, K. L. Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 1979, 20,
Materials Applied Science Publishers, London, 1971, vol. 2, 153
p. 116 76 Kirk, T. K. and Yang, H. H. BiotechnoL Lett. 1979, 1,347
35 Streamer, M., Eriksson, K. E. and Pettersson, B. Eur. J. 77 Yang, H. H., Effland, M. J. and Kirk, T. K. Biotechnol.
Biochem. 1975,59,607 Bioeng. 1979, 21,129
36 Selby, K. Proc. Int. Biodeterioration Symp. 1968, 1, 62 78 Kawakani, H. J. Jpn Wood Res. Soc. 1976, 22,252
37 Kantham, B. C. L. in Abstr. 2nd Int. Symp. Bioconv. Biochem. 79 Haider, K., Trojanowski, J. and Sundman, V. Arch.
Eng., H T Delhi, India March 3 - 6 , 1980 MicrobioL 1978, 119, 103
38 Boretti, G., Garafano, L., Montecucchi, P. and Spalla, C. 80 Crawford, D. L. and Sunderland, J. B. Dev. Ind. MicrobioL
Arch. MicrobioL 1972, 92,189 1979, 20, 143
39 Huseman, E., Keilich, G. and Staehelin, A. in Abstr. 5th Int. 81 Robinson, L. E. and Crawford, R. L. FEMSMicrobioL Lett.
Ferment. Syrup. (Deliweg, H., ed.) 1976, p. 442 1978, 4,301
40 Bisaria, V. S. and Ghose, T. K. in Proc. Bioconv. Symp. 82 Bisaria, V. S. and Eggeling, L. unpublished results
(Ghose, T. K., ed.), liT Delhi, India, March 1977, p. 155 83 Higuchi, T.Adv. Enzymol. 1971, 34,207
41 Eriksson, K. E. in Proc. Symp. Enz. HydroL Cellulose (Bailey, 84 Crawford, D. L. and Crawford, R. L. Enzyme Microb. TechnoL
M., Enari, T. M. and Linko, M., eds.), Aulanko, Finland, March 1980, 2, 11
1975, p. 263 85 Okada, G., Nisizawa, K. and Suzuki, H. J. Biochem. {Tokyo)
42 Wood, T. M. and McCrae, S. I. Carbohydr. Res. 1977, 57,117 1968, 63,591
43 Vaidya, M., Mishra, C., Rao, M. and Deshpande, V. V. in Abstr. 86 Emert, G. K., Lang, J. A., Liu, T. H. and Brown, D. R. Adv.
2nd lnt. Syrup. Bioconv. Biochem. Eng. H T Delhi, lndia March Chem. Ser. 1974, 136, 79
1980 87 Berghem, L. E. R. and Pettersson, L. G. Eur. J. Biochem. 1973,
44 Sadana, J. C., Shewale, J. G. and Deshpande, M. V. AppL 37,21
Environ. Microbiol. 1979, 38, 730 88 Selby, K. and Maitland, G. C. Biochem. J. 1965,94,578
45 Sadana, J. C., Shewale, J. G. and Deshpande, M. V. inAbstr. 89 Pettersson, L. G. in Proc. Symp. Enz. Hydrol. Cellulose
2nd Int. Symp. Bioconv. Biochem. Eng., H T Delhi, lndia (Bailey, M., Enari, T. M. and Linko, M., eds), Aulanko,
March 1980 Finland, March 1975, p. 255
46 Tanaka, M., Taniguchi, M., Morinaga, T., Matsuno, R. and 90 HaRiwell, G. and Griffen, M. Biochem. J. 1973, 135,587
Kamikubo, T. J. Ferment. Technol. 1980, 58 (2), 149 91 Wood, T. M. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. no. 5, 1975, p. 111
47 Rho, D., Desrochers, M. and Steele, P. in Abstr. 6th Int. 92 Wood, T. M. and McCrae, S. I. Adv. Chem. Ser. 1979, 181,
Ferment. Symp. London, Canada 1980, p. 89 181
48 Weimer, P. J. and Zeikus, J. G. AppL Environ. Microbiol. 1977, 93 Rodionova, N. A., Martinovich, L. I. and Smirova, N. I. in
33 (2), 289 Proc. 2rid Int. Symp. Bioconv. Biochem. Eng., H T DelhL
49 Forget, P., Cattaneo, J., Creuzet, N. and Ait, N. inAbstr. 2nd March 1980
Int. Syrup. Bioconv. Biochem. Eng., H T Delhi, India March 1980 94 Siwinska, K. and Galas, E. in Proc. Int. Bioconv. Symp.
50 Gordon, J. and Cooney, C. L. in Abstr. 6th Int. Ferment. (Ghose, T. K,, ed.), IIT Delhi, India, March 1977, p. 89
Symp., London, Canada 1980, p. 87 95 Gorbacheva, I. V. and Rodionova, N. A. in Proc. lnt. Bioconv.
51 Phillips, J. A. and Humphrey, A. E. in Abstr, 2rid Int. Symp. Symp. (Ghose, T. K., ed.), liT Delhi, India, March 1977,
Bioconv. Biochem. Eng., H T Delhi, India March 1980 p. 227
52 Gray, P. p. and Dunn, N. W. in Abstr. 2nd Int. Syrup. Bioeonv. 96 Toh, S. E., Kinoshita, S. and Okada, H. in Annu. Rep. ICME
Bioehem. Eng., H T Delhi, lndia March 1980 vol. 1, Osaka Univ. Japan, 1978, p. 273
53 Gray, P. P. and Dunn, N. W. in Abstr. 6th Int. Ferment. Syrup., 97 Panbangred, W., Kinoshita, S. and Okada, H. in Annu. Rep.
London, Canada 1980,p. 88 ICME vol. 2, Osaka Univ. Japan, 1979, p. 227
54 Klupfel, D., Biron, L. and Ishaque, I. Biotechnol. Lett. 1980, 98 Oguntimein, G. B. and Reilly, P. J. BiotechnoL Lett. 1980, 22,
2,309 1127
55 Goksoyr, J., Eidsa, G., Eriksen, J. and Osmundsvag, K. in Proc. 99 Claeyssens, M. and DeBruyne, C. K. Biochim. Biophys. Acta
Symp. Enz. Hydrol. Cellulose (Bailey, M., Enari, T. M. and 1978, 533, 98
Linko, M., eds), Aulanko, Finland, March 1975, p. 217 100 Iwahara, S. and Higuchi, T. presented at Symp. on Biosynthesis
56 Chavanich, S., Nilubol, N. and Hayashida, S. Annu. Rep. ICME and Biodegradation o f Cell Wall Components, ACS/CSJ
vol. 2, Osaka University, 1979, p. 301 Chemical Congress, Honolulu, Hawaii, April 1979
57 Holtzapple, M., Humphrey, A. E. and Pye, E. K. inAbstr. 6th 101 Westermark, U. and Eriksson, K. E. Acta Chem. Scand. (B)
Int. Ferment. Symp., London, Canada 1980, p. 87 1975, 29,419
58 Mandels, M. BiotechnoL Bioeng. Symp. no. 5 1975, p. 81 102 Ander, P. and Eriksson, K. E. Arch. Mierobiol. 1976, 109, 1
59 Takahashi, M. and Hashimoto, Y. J. Ferment. TeehnoL 1970, 103 Reese, E. T., Siu, R. G. H. and Levinson, H. S.J. BacterioL
41,169 1950, 59,485