https://www.youtube.com/watch?

v=jzydFWuOboo

THE GOOD PATRIOT

I think also worth pointing out is these things they call "v ! r uses" have never been proven. As a
biomedical engineer that recognizes the flaws in virology and does not believe in "v ! r uses". One of the
questions I get asked a lot is "what proof or process would you regard as being valid in confirming (or
otherwise) the existence of v ! r uses" (a.k.a. mythical creatures)? Basically scientists would just need to
adhere to the Scientific Method, but that's apparently too much to ask.

To hold any validity, scientists would need to actually Isolate & Purify out whatever particles they
hypothesis could be v! r uses from a sick person, and then perform proper scientific experiments with
them in order to prove that hypothesis true (or not). Ironically, the isolation method I'm about to
describe is even written in microbiology text books and universally recognized as the Gold Standard of
isolation. Yet virologists never do it:

ISOLATION & PURIFICATION

They should be taking fluid samples from a diseased person and then filtering through "viral sized"
particles to bulk remove larger things from the sample. Then follow that up with density gradient
centrifugation; which allows objects in a centrifuge tube to be separated by their density. That process
would create separated "bands” (objects of different density) around the centrifuge tube. The suspected
v! r us particles (if they existed) could then be extracted from one of those bands - thereby Isolated &
Purified from everything else. Just Step-1.

CONFIRMATION AND CHARACTERIZATION

The suspected particles should be visualized under a microscope to see what they look like and Ensure
everything under the scope are the same type of particles. Those objects should be mapped and
characterized for their physical structure, size, and genetic makeup. Once scientists have ensured they've
captured those unique particles only, they would then need to determine if they are in fact real life v ! r
uses.

EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES

They'd need to use those particles in properly conducted experiments to see if they cause the original
disease; using animal/plant/human hosts as test subjects, depending on the hypothesis. They would also
need to run at least one equivalent negative control experiment (i.e. a control group) in parallel for
comparison. If the hosts that were exposed to the particles become ill with the original disease and the
otherwise equally treated control group does not, that would be suggestive of the particles being the
cause. However, the basic idea of a v ! r us is that it invades a host, replicates itself via hijacking cells, and
then comes out with bodily fluid (sneezes, coughs, etc.) and then goes on to repeat that process in
different hosts, which is how it "spreads". So scientists would need to try and confirm that by again
isolating & purify out those same particles from the hosts fluid samples. If the particles are discovered
again in the exposed sick hosts, but not in the otherwise equally treated control group, then those
particles could be said to be something like real life v ! r uses. They'd still need to do further studies to
confirm the "hijack cells" theory, but hopefully you get the idea.

OBVIOUS FLAWS OF VIROLOGY

Virologists can’t just take pictures of something or sequence genetic material or claim symptoms/effects
equals proof of a “v ! r us”. They need to FIRST demonstrate that through proper experimentation that
follows the scientific method - That approach has never occurred in validating what they claim. It's
simply a circular reasoning kind of belief system.
Their claims of “we have pictures” is ridiculous because microscopic particles don’t have little name tags
on them that say “I’m a v ! rus”.

Their claims of genetic sequencing and pcr detection is equally ridiculous because they never separated
out a “v ! r us" in the first place to prove that’s the origin of the genetic material.

They assume they found a virus by comparing it to genetic “virus templates” that were ALSO “found” the
same way. It’s like claiming to have found a unicorn based on genetic material that you believe has a
genetic similarity to that of a previous unicorn, yet no one ever found an ACTUAL Unicorn to get any
genetic material in the first place!

Their claims of Effects/Symptoms equals an obvious sign of a “v ! r us” is probably the worst one yet.
“The burned bodies MUST have been caused by a fire breathing dragon!".

Their claims of “cytophathic effects” (i.e. cell destruction) observed in cell cultures equals a “v ! r us”
must be the cause of it is really just silly, for reasons that should be obvious.

So on and so forth… Just an endless loop of circular reasoning.