Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted To
Prof. Saroj Koul & Dr. Chitresh Kumar
Submitted By
B Vamsee Krishna Vyas
20142116
IBM’14
Contents
1. Company Profile
2. Selection Criteria
5. Approach
Company Profile
1
Karnataka Engineering Company is in Raichur, India. It had entered 2-wheeler industry in 1981
starting with mopeds. It had started production of scooters in 1983. Overall India, it has 19
branches have been established. The minimum throughput that would justify setting up of a
branch in any state would be 4.25 lakh per month (78 Mopeds or 33 Scooters per month or any
In Andhra Pradesh, they are situated in 22 locations. We have divided the locations in Andhara
Mopeds and Scooter are transported by a specially adapted truck with a capacity of either 80
Case Facts
2
Sales from Jan-Jul’1998 are 465 mopeds and 78 scooters
Andhra Pradesh between the time frame of Jan-Jul’98 have contributed around 5.3% of KEC’s,
Average monthly off take in AP during Jan-Jul’1998 are 1925 mopeds and 288 scooters
At this rate the money outflow to exchequer is Rs.573260/- ; Cost for setting up one branch is
So, 2 branches can be set up in the state at the current rate of tax and sales issues.
Selection of the routes from the warehouses to meet their demand constraints and to
Approach
3
1.
Here we are looking at the transportation cost of each company for different products. We can
know the primary and secondary transportation costs for each for different scenarios.
<=20 4 T-3 1 20
21 – 56 4.8 T-2* 1 56
57 – 80 6 T-1 1 80
81 – 112 9.6 T-2* 2 56
113 – 136 10.8 T-1, T-2* 1, 1 80, 56
137 – 160 12 T-1 2 80
161 – 180 16 T-1, T-3 2, 1 80, 20
181 -216 16.8 T-1, T-2* 2, 1 80, 56
217 – 240 18 T-1 3 80
241 – 260 22 T-1, T-3 3, 1 80, 20
261 – 296 22.8 T-1, T-2* 3, 1 80, 56
297 – 320 24 T-1 4 80
321 – 340 28 T-1, T-3 4, 1 80, 20
341 – 376 28.8 T-1, T-2* 4, 1 80, 56
377 – 400 30 T-1 5 80
401 – 420 34 T-1, T-3 5, 1 80, 20
421 – 456 34.8 T-1, T-2* 5, 1 80, 56
457 – 480 36 T-1 6 80
481 – 500 40 T-1, T-3 6, 1 80, 20
501 – 536 40.8 T-1, T-2* 6, 1 80, 56
537 – 560 42 T-1 7 80
561 – 580 46 T-1, T-3 7, 1 80, 20
581 – 616 46.8 T-1, T-2* 7, 1 80, 56
617 – 640 48 T-1 8 80
641 – 660 52 T-1, T-3 8, 1 80, 20
661 – 696 52.8 T-1, T-2* 8, 1 80, 56
697 – 720 54 T-1 9 80
721 – 740 58 T-1, T-3 9, 1 80, 20
741 – 776 58.8 T-1, T-2* 9, 1 80, 56
777 – 800 60 T-1 10 80
801 – 820 64 T-1, T-3 10, 1 80, 20
821 – 856 64.8 T-1, T-2* 10, 1 80, 56
857 – 880 66 T-1 11 80
4
881 – 900 70 T-1, T-3 11, 1 80, 20
901 – 936 70.8 T-1, T-2* 11, 1 80, 56
937 – 960 72 T-1 12 80
961 – 980 76 T-1, T-3 12, 1 80, 20
981 – 1016 76.8 T-1, T-2* 12, 1 80, 56
1017 – 1040 78 T-1 13 80
1041 – 1060 82 T-1, T-3 13, 1 80, 20
1061 – 1096 82.8 T-1, T-2* 13, 1 80, 56
*Indifferent situation for selection of transporter between T-1 & T-2 (same rates for both options).
The main idea here to examine more than 1 branch is to watch over the savings done in both
primary and secondary transportation costs, when compared to the expense of new branch.
Following this,
Secondary Transportation unit costs = Sum of all minimum costs (rate * min distance)
Operating with 4 branches of warehouse facilities, one at Adoni, Cuddappah, Kurnool and the
other at Mahbubnagar are selected in the case. The selection criteria for the same is given below
Selection Criteria:
5
Secondary transportation is one of the huge tasks to tackle with.
3. The excel tables were formed for different scenarios to know the output of different situations.
The combinations which are selected are as follows 6C1, 6C2, 6C3,6C4, 6C5, & 6C6.
In this scenario 3 (6C1), we have chosen only 1 distribution center i.e., Adoni. It had the highest
secondary transportation cost, which would be a big expense to the company. And also, it would
This scenario 10 (6C2), we have considered 2 locations which are Hyderabad and Kurnool. They
The scenario 8 (6C3), consist of3 distribution centers which include Adoni, Kurnool, M’nagar.
Though the profits are high in this scenario, the secondary transportation cost is high, which
6
The scenario 4 (6C4), consist of 4 distribution centres mainly Adoni, Cuddappah, Kurnool,
M’nagar. This is one of the most favorable scenario as it gives highest returns for two of our
distribution centers. As these can reduce the transportation distance between different locations
In this scenario 1 (6C5), we have taken 5 distribution centers, and calculated the revenue,
primanry and secondary transportation cost, sales tax, operating cost and through put cost. The
selected distribution centers Adoni, Cuddappah, Hyderabad, Kurnool, M’nagar. We can see that
one of the distribution centers is reporting losses Mahbubnagar (-2.07lkh). So this scenario
7
In this scenario 1 (6C6), of the selected distribution centers are reporting losses if we select the
Kurnool and M’nagar are reporting losses of -2.92 lakh & -2.07 lkh respectively. So we won’t be
We have not included the scheduling events of the trucks dispatch methods, as there is no
sufficient data been provided in this particular part. From the above scenarios, we can say that
transportation costs savings have been taken into consideration and not on the cost incurred on
the inventory.
According the above analysis, I would recommend going with scenario 5 (6C1),
because the other all 4 scenario’s 6C1, 6C2,6C3,6C4 are making decent amount of profits and
the other 2 scenarios 6C5 & 6C6 are producing losses. 6C1, scenario has been generating the
highest amount of profit for the organization, when compared to the other scenarios. It is also
Branch Profit = Revenue – Throughput cost – Operating cost – Transportation cost (primary +
secondary)