Republic of the Philippines NATIONAL POLICE COMMISSION NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS, PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE DIRECTORATE FOR PERSONNEL AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT ‘Camp 8Gen Rafael T Crame, Quezon City ‘DLOD220531- Ue MEMORANDUM FOR TDHRDD FROM OIC, DPRM SUBJECT Endorsement for Attrition Screening Deliberation DATE May 31, 2022 1. References: a, Memorandum from that Directorate dated May 4, 2022 with subject: “Endorsement for Attrition by Other Means” with attached original copy of his signed Sworn Statement, received by this Directorate on May 18, 2022: b. NAPOLCOM Memorandum Circular No. 2008-005 entitled, “Prescribing Policies, Procedures and Guidelines Governing the Attrition System for Uniformed Personnel of Philippine National Police"; and c. Memorandum from that Directorate with subject: “Result of Qualifying Examination and Remedial Examination for PSOBC, PSOAC and PSOSEC.” 2. This pertains to the memorandum from that Directorate dated May 4, 2022, endorsing the list of 91 Police Commissioned Officers (PCO) who allegedly failed to pass the required Online Qualifying Examination (QE) on February 10 and 17, 2022 for PCOs Career Courses and the Remedial Examination (RE) on March 15, 2022, through Canvass Application to the concerned Screening Committee. The endorsement for attrition was made on the basis of the provision of Section 29 (d)' of Republic Act No. 8551 and the provision of paragraph 4,? Section 3 (e) of NAPOLCOM Memorandum Circular (NMC) No. 2008-005. 3. While the basis for the endorsement for attrition is well established under Section 29 (d) of Republic Act No. 8551 and the provision of paragraph 4, Section 3 (e) of NMC No. 2008-005, this Directorate, however, would like to clarify on the * *6) failure to pass the required entrance examinations twice and/or finish the required career courses except for justifiable reasons * Procedures and Guidelines Governing the Attrition System for Uniformed Personnel of the resending Philippine National Pokce emfollowing, prior to endorsing the formal verified complaint to the concerned Screening Committee: a. Whether DHRDD has issued an approved standard examination guidelines, establishing the passing percentage and approving the set of questionnaires for each mandatory training; and b. Whether based on the existing guidelines, a remedial examination should be considered and treated as another examination that would qualify as ground for attrition or just a continuation of the first examination. 4. The additional information pertaining to the above will be included in the endorsement to the Selection Committee. ROBERT }UEZ Police ral