Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REPORT THIS AD
ECO-INTELLIGENT™
MAKING THE WORLD ECOLOGICALLY INTELLIGENT
The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 the first of a series of legislation
passed by the Government of India pertaining to regulation of environmental aspects in the
country. Rising water pollution due to industrial and domestic activities became a cause of
concern, leading to the enaction of this legislation. This Act was followed by the Air
(Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, Environment Protection Act, 1986, Noise
Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000, and Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and
Handling) Rules, 2000 (the last one was recently replaced by Solid Waste Management Rules
(SWM), 2016). This post is a summary of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act,
1974.
The main feature of the Water Act is the control of pollution through a permit or “consent
administration” procedure. Discharge of effluents into water bodies was only allowed by
obtaining the consent of the State Board, within restrictions it poses.
It is important to note that under the Indian Constitution, Water is a state subject. The Central
Government cannot pass any legislation pertaining to state subjects unless such a legislation
is approved by State Governments. This Act was passed after a majority of states of India
(Assam, Bihar, Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Karnataka, Kerala,
Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Tripura and West Bengal and the Union territories) accepted this
legislation.
Photo from a cleanliness drive in Forest Research Institute, India. Credits: IFSA Local Chapter, FRI.
To simplify this statement, this Act covers the following aspects of regulating water resources
in the country:
The Act has 64 sections compiled in VIII chapters. Chapter II establishes the Central and State
Pollution Control Boards; Chapter IV describes the powers of the Boards; Chapter V explains
steps to prevent and control water pollution; and Chapter VII describes penalties and
punishment procedure when these rules are flouted.
The Act was amended in 1978 and again in 1988. In 1988 Amendment made it conform
closely with the provisions of the Environment Protection Act, 1986.
Section 3 and Section 4: Constitution of the Central Pollution Control Board and
State Pollution Control Boards, respectively, are provided the authority to exercise the
powers conferred to them under this Act.
Section 16: Functions of the Central Board are described, some of which include:
1. Advise the Central Government on any matter concerning the prevention and control
of water pollution
2. Co-ordinate the activities of the State Boards and provide technical assistance and
guidance
3. Collect, compile and publish technical and statistical data relating to water pollution
4. Establish or recognize a laboratory or laboratories to enable the Board to perform its
functions under this section efficiently including the analysis of samples of water from
any stream or well or of samples of any sewage or trade effluents
Section 17: Functions of the State Board are described, some of which include:
1. Plan a comprehensive programme for the prevention, control or abatement of
pollution of streams and wells in the State and to secure the execution
2. Advice the state government on matters of water pollution
3. Inspect and lay down, modify or annul effluent standards for the sewage and trade
effluents
4. Evolve economical and reliable methods of treatment of sewage and trade effluents
Section 19: If the State Board feels that the provisions of this Act need not apply to some
parts of the State, it may recommend the State Government to do so.
Section 20: This section provides power to the State Board to appoint person(s) on its
behalf to take surveys of any area and gauge and keep records of flow, volume and other
characteristics of streams and wells to perform its functions dutifully.
Section 33: This section gives power to the Boards to appeal to the courts to restrict
certain actions, if it feels that it is likely to cause harm to water resources in an area. The
court has the power to decide for or against such an application.
Under the Chapter for penalties, various penalties are described pertaining to the
contravention of provisions of different Sections of this Act. For example, under Section
41, Whoever fails to comply with any order issued under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section
32 or any direction issued by a court under sub-section (2) of section 33 or any direction
issued under section 33A shall, in respect of each such failure and on conviction, be
punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than one year and six
months but which may extend to six years and with fine, and in case the failure continues,
with an additional fine which may extend to five thousand rupees for every day during which
such failure continues after the conviction for the first such failure.
Section 51 and Section 52: Under these Sections, the Act sets up the Central Water
Laboratory and State Water Laboratory respectively.
Notably missing from this Act is any provision to prevent pollution of groundwater resources.
Further, non-point sources of water pollution from agriculture and discharge waterwater
from municipal sources are also not considered yet (both of which have become major
sources of pollution today).
Further reading:
Advertisements
REPORT THIS AD
POSTED IN ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND POLICIES • TAGGED ENVIRONMENT, ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE, ENVIRONMENTAL
LAW, EXPLORE ECOLOGY, INDIA, POLICY, SCIENCE, WATER, WATER ACT 1974, WATER POLLUTION
PREV
5 promising financing options for urban forestry in India
NEXT
The implication of sea level rise: Why is sea level rise of just 65 cm such a big deal?
4 THOUGHTS
Pingback: India’s Environment Protection Act, 1986- An overview – Eco-intelligent
Pingback: India’s Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 – An overview – Eco-
intelligent
Leave a Reply
Enter your comment here...
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
WE'VE HELPED
We'll deliver our latest content to the Social tab in your inbox.
We’ll drop you a text with the link to the latest post.
REPORT THIS AD
TWEET WITH US
Tweets by @_Ecointelligent
Eco-intelligent™
@_Ecointelligent
A little talked about effect of #biodiversityloss: fewer numbers and variety of sounds in the natural world. Plantations are
acoustically bland and anemic compared to the vigor of a forest with diverse life!#nature #sounds #diversity
Apr 5, 2022
Eco-intelligent™
@_Ecointelligent
What's the limit to putting a price on nature? Here, we take a look at both sides of this moral dilemma.#nature
#sustainability#ClimateCrisis #ClimateActionNoweco-intelligent.com/2022/03/05/sho…
Should we pay for the oxygen trees provide us?: The ethical debate behind putting a price on nature
Is putting a price on nature the only way to conserve it? Or are we crossing a moral line by “commodifying” nature?
eco-intelligent.com
Mar 8, 2022
Eco-intelligent™
@_Ecointelligent
Global health equity, sustainable development and international policy response to climate change are
inseparable.#ClimateCrisis #ClimateAction #climatechange
Mar 7, 2022
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
© Eco-intelligent™, 2015-2022.
DISCLAIMER
All opinions expressed on this website—in the past and for all eternity—are of the authors
and do not reflect the opinions of their employers.
So if you have any problems with what we’ve written, please take it up directly with us. We
would really appreciate that, thanks!