Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CALENDAR:
The Senate will return Monday and stay in session through Thursday. The House will return
Tuesday and stay in session through Friday.
On Tuesday, the House took up and passed the Rule governing floor consideration of H.R. 8294,
Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,
2023; H.R. 8373, the Right to Contraception Act; and H.R. 8404, the Respect for Marriage Act.
Then the House took up H.R. 8294, the appropriations minibus bill. After considering six
amendments – of which three were adopted – the House set the bill aside and took up H.R.
8404, the Respect for Marriage Act, which would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act. For those
keeping score at home, the Defense of Marriage Act passed the House of Representatives in
1996 with 342 votes, of which 224 were cast by Republicans, and 118 by Democrats. (In the
Senate, the bill passed by a vote of 84-15, with 52 votes coming from Republicans, and 32 from
Democrats.) A quarter century later, a bill to repeal that legislation passed by a vote of 267-157,
with 47 Republicans voting with all 220 Democrats. Then the House passed a whole bunch of
bills under Suspension of the Rules.
On Wednesday, the House returned to H.R. 8294, the minibus appropriations bill. After
considering three more amendments – two of which were adopted – the House voted on the bill
as amended. The bill passed by a vote of 220-207.
On Thursday, the House took up H.R. 8373, the Right to Contraception Act. The House passed it
by a vote of 228-195.
On Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday, the House is scheduled to consider H.R. 3771, the South
Asian Heart Health Awareness and Research Act of 2022; H.R. 5118, the Wildfire Response and
Drought Resiliency Act; H.R. 6929, the Susan Muffley Act of 2022; H.R. 4040, the Advancing
Telehealth Beyond COVID-19 Act of 2022; and H.R. 263, the Big Cat Public Safety Act. In addition,
the House will consider two more bills under Suspension of the Rules – H.R. 7283, the STREAM
Act, as amended, and H.R. 5093, the Wind River Administrative Site Conveyance Act, as
amended.
On Tuesday, the Senate voted to confirm her to that position. Then the Senate voted to invoke
cloture on, and then to confirm, the nomination of Nancy L. Maldonado to be a U.S. District
Judge for the Northern District of Illinois. Then the Senate voted to confirm Julianna Michelle
Childs to be a U.S. Circuit Judge for the District of Columbia Circuit.
Then the Senate took up the Motion to Proceed to the House message to accompany H.R. 4346,
the vehicle for the CHIPS-plus bill. That was agreed to by a vote of 64-34.
On Wednesday, the Senate voted to invoke cloture on, and then to confirm, the nomination of
Gregory Brian Williams to be a U.S. District Judge for the District of Delaware. Then the Senate
voted to confirm Bernadette M. Meehan to be Ambassador of the United States of America to
the Republic of Chile. Then the Senate voted on a Motion to Proceed to S.Con.Res. 43, Indiana
Republican Sen. Mike Braun’s budget resolution that would balance the budget in ten years
while cutting taxes by $2 trillion. The Motion to Proceed was defeated by a vote of 34-63.
On Thursday, the Senate voted to confirm Reuben E. Brigety II to be Ambassador of the United
States of America to the Republic of South Africa, and Shereef M. Elnahal to be Under Secretary
for Health of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Then, by voice vote, the Senate voted to
confirm Adair Ford Boroughs to be U.S. Attorney for the District of South Carolina; Enix Smith, III
to be a U.S. Marshal for the Eastern District of Louisiana; and Leslie N. Bluhm, Lisette Nieves, and
Deborah R. Coen to be Members of the Board of Directors of the Corporation for National and
Community Service.
COVID UPDATE:
In a rather remarkable interview on FOX News’ Friday edition of “Your World with Neal Cavuto,”
former White House COVID Response Coordinator Dr. Deborah Birx acknowledged, “I knew
these vaccines were not going to protect against infection. And I think we overplayed the
vaccines, and it made people then worry that it’s not going to protect against severe disease and
hospitalization.”
Some Democrats remember the last time Congress passed a so-called “assault weapons” ban. It
was in 1994, and it was one of the factors that led to the 1994 Gingrich Revolution, when House
Republicans netted 53 seats and recaptured control of the House for the first time in 40 years.
So it shouldn't be surprising that some Democrats in the House, worried about their own
reelection campaigns, haven’t yet signed on to this bill.
Speaker Pelosi has a four-seat margin right now. The bill only has 211 cosponsors. Jared Golden
of ME and Henry Cuellar of TX are definite “nos.” Likely nos include Ron Kind of WI and Kurt
Schrader of OR. Neither one of them is coming back in the next Congress, so there’s nothing the
House Democrat leadership can do to them OR for them.
Other undecideds include Tom O’Halleran of AZ, Vicente Gonzales of TX, Peter DeFazio of OR,
Mike Thompson of CA, and Sanford Bishop of GA.
On the other hand, there’s always the possibility that a few Republicans – check Adam Kinzinger
of IL and Chris Jacobs of NY, neither of whom is coming back in the next Congress – might vote
FOR the bill.
Of course, even if this bill were to pass the House, it would go nowhere in the Senate. Which
raises a question – why force vulnerable House Democrats to take a vote on a bill that’s going
nowhere in the Senate?
The Biden White House and the rest of the senior levels of the national security establishment
are reported to be very concerned about this trip, fearing it could provoke the communist
government in the People’s Republic of China, which claims Taiwan as a province of China. Said
Biden, “The military thinks it’s not a good idea right now … But I don’t know what the status of it
is.”
Administration officials will not interfere with Pelosi’s visit out of respect for the separation of
powers. Instead, they have gone public with warnings about the grave consequences of a trip to
Taiwan by a high-ranking U.S. government official.
Of course, the communist Chinese government is very upset about the prospect of a trip to
Taiwan by Pelosi. It doesn’t help that the President of the United States has not simply declared
his support for her trip. Telling us what “the military” thinks – whoever that may be – is
inappropriate.
Pelosi should follow through with her plans and go on the trip, if only to send a signal to the
communist Chinese that they cannot intimidate the U.S. government into not sending high-
ranking officials to Taiwan.
The Senate parliamentarian has to approve the legislation before it can move forward under the
rules for reconciliation. She met with senior Democrat and Republican staff last week to vet the
portions of the bill that had been drafted at that point. We’ve had no word yet on how that’s
working out, but we anticipate that we will hear something later this week, possibly as early as
today.
Here's part of the problem. The United States just isn’t a very attractive place to set up a chip
manufacturing plant, and it hasn’t been for a long time – if it were, we wouldn’t be dealing with
this problem in the first place. With our heavy regulatory regime and high taxes, compared to
our international rivals, it just doesn’t make economic sense for some companies to do their chip
manufacturing here. Taiwan, South Korea, and China lead the world in chip manufacturing
largely because with our comparatively higher taxes and tougher regulatory regime, those
countries can do the manufacturing at a cost that’s 25-40 percent less than the U.S. That’s why
we’ve fallen from producing 40 percent of the world’s chips three decades ago to only producing
12 percent of the world’s chips now. And that’s a growing problem, because some of those chips
are things we use for military purposes and even election hardware, which we really shouldn’t be
manufacturing overseas at all because of the national security aspect of the equation.
But Democrats are in charge, and they like to regulate things and they like to spend money. in
fact, spending money is the litmus test on the left for showing that you care about something –
how much of Other People’s Money are you willing to spend on it? The spending hammer is the
only tool in their tool box, and that means every problem they see looks like a nail.
What we ought to do instead, of course, is shrink the regulatory regime even as we reduce the
tax burden across the board – that is, not for a select group of companies in one particular
industry area, but for all companies. When government gets into the business of picking winners
and losers, as it does with this legislation, it ends up creating a lot more losers – in fact,
everybody loses, because political factors come into play in what should be strictly economic
decisions. That’s a distortion, and that hurts everyone.
SUGGESTED READING
TEA PARTY PATRIOTS/JENNY BETH MARTIN:
TH: Jenny Beth Martin: Will Senate Republicans Stand Firm on Spending Negotiations?
JTN: Does Bannon Contempt Case Open Door for GOP to Compel Hunter Biden Testimony? Some
Think So
TPPA'S Chairman Jenny Beth Martin Talks About Holding the GOP's Feet to the Fire
NRO: McCarthy: Steve Bannon Convicted, of Course: What to Watch for Next
Politico: House Dems Still Wrangling The Votes For An Assault Weapons Ban
Politico: White House Clash with Pelosi Over Taiwan Spills into The Open
Politico: Top House Democrats Are Sounding Cool To Stalled-Out Coronavirus Aid Being Included
WSJ: Bill Aims To Block Aid For Companies That Build Advanced Chips In China
CNN: DHS Inspector General Tells Secret Service To Stop Investigating Potentially Missing Texts
WaPo: Even A Day After Jan.6, Trump Balked At Condemning The Violence
Politico: 'Sprint Through the Finish’: Why The Jan. 6 Committee Isn't Nearly Done
MISCELLANEOUS:
WE: US Allies Think Iran Is Playing Biden For Time At Risk Of War
WT: House Passes Contraception Bill Decried By Republicans As 'Trojan Horse' For Abortion
WT: Supreme Court Rejects Biden's Bid To Revive Policy Stopping Deportations
JTN: Supreme Court Won't Reinstate Biden Immigration Policies, Pending Litigation
DailySignal: House-Passed 'Respect For Marriage Act' Isn't About Marriage, It's About Complying
With Woke Ideology
Fox News: Hunter Biden Probe Reaches 'Critical Stage’, As Officials Weigh Possible Charges
CNN: Federal Investigation of Hunter Biden Reaches Critical Juncture, Sources Say
NRO: Biden Blasts Republicans For Failing To Recognize Climate 'Emergency', Vows To Use
Executive Action
WT: Biden Unveils Executive Action On Climate Change But Stops Short Of Declaring National
Emergency
Axios: Inside Trump '25: A Radical Plan for Trump's Second Term