Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IASBABA’S
PRELIMS EXCLUSIVE
PROGRAM (PEP) 2022
MODERN HISTORY
HANDOUTS
WWW.IASBABA.COM, PEP@IASBABA.COM
ZGVmMjcxYTA3NGI1
TOPICS - Arrival of Europeans and British Conquest of India, Battle of Plassey, Anglo-
Mysore wars, Anglo- Maratha Wars, British Expansion in North India, Economic
Consequences of Colonial Rule, British Land Settlement; Educational Policies
THE DUTCH
THE ENGLISH
1615 Sir Thomas Roe Sent by King James I as an ambassador to the court
of Jahangir.
He was successful in obtaining royal farman
permitting the British to trade and set up factories
in all parts of the Mughal Empire.
1639 Francis Day Was able to obtain Madras on lease from the Raja
of Chandragiri.
English set up the factory.
He built a small fort around it called Fort St.
George.
Subahdar of Bengal.
THE FRENCH
Result: Muzaffar Jung Awarded the French with a grant of 80 villages near
became Hyderabad’s Nizam. Pondicherry
Muhammad Ali became the Feeling the extension of French influence, the British
Nawab of the Carnatic. decided to support Nasir Jung.
Battle for the Throne of The Nizam has begun the
second phase of Anglo French war known as second
Carnatic War
French Army surprised and killed Nasir Jung in
Hyderabad
Installed French protege Muzaffar Jung.
He awarded Dupleix by giving him honorary governor
Siege of Arcot.
Chanda Sahib got captured and was beheaded by the
Raja of Travancore.
Muhammad Ali then became the Undisputed Nawab
of the Carnatic.
Dupleix was recalled.
Signed a peace Treaty- the Treaty of Pondicherry with
the English in 1755.
According to it, both the companies agreed not to
interfere in the quarrels of the Indian princes.
Result: it proved inconclusive though the English had
an edge over the French.
Consequences
Mirzapur was proclaimed as Nawab of Bengal.
Robert Clive was confirmed as Governor of Bengal.
Company was granted undisputed right to free trade in
Bengal, Bihar and Orissa.
British officials no longer needed to pay any taxes on the
private trade.
Company received its zamindari of 24 Parganas near
Kolkata.
All the French settlement in Bengal was surrendered to
the English.
Significance
Since Mir Jafar was appointed as the Nawab by the British,
the real power laid in the hands of the British.
Mr. Watts, the British president at Murshidabad, began to
wield considerable influence.
After Plassey, the company emerged supreme and
established its Monopoly over Bengal trade.
Vast resources of Bengal placed at British disposal.
With the revenues of Bengal, the English were able to
meet the cost of conquest of rest of the country.
British victory in Plassey marked the beginning of British
conquest of Bengal and later of India.
of Bengal.
Najm-ud-Daulah was allowed to succeed his father on
following conditions: (1) He would surrender Defence and
Foreign Affairs in the hands of company and civil
administration into the hands of Naib Subahdar
nominated by the Company.
(2) Infamous Dual System was established also known as
diarchy. It was a dual system where, in theory, Company
exercised Dewani functions while the Nawab of Bengal
exercised the Nizamat functions. However, in practice, the
Company acquired all real powers while the responsibility
for administration rested with the Nawab.
It had consequences for the people of Bengal as neither
the Company nor the Nawab cared for their welfare.
Drain of wealth from Bengal began as company stopped
sending money from England to buy Indian goods.
The goods were purchased from the revenues of Bengal.
Drain of wealth greatly impoverished Bengal.
It was a major factor responsible for terrible Bengal
famine of 1770.
Adverse impact of Dual System - Complete breakdown of
Administration and law and order in Bengal.
Bengal now faced the spectre of famines.
Dual government lead to destruction of trade and
commerce in Bengal.
Indigenous industry and skilled cotton weavers of Bengal
were compelled to buy raw material from and sell woven
clothes to the Company exclusively.
Overall moral degradation of Bengal society.
Significance
British once again emerged as a Supreme Power.
ZGVmMjcxYTA3NGI1
Immediate context:
Rivalry over Control of Northern Circars.
Rivalry ultimately led to a tripartite treaty between the
Marathas, the Nizam and the English against Haider Ali.
They attacked Mysore in 1766.
Haider persuaded the Nizam and the Marathas to join hands
with him against the English.
Forced the Madras Council to sign peace on his terms.
The war ended with the Treaty of Madras in 1769.
As per the Treaty both the powers agreed to help each other
in case of an attack by a third party.
Result:
Haider Ali had an edge over the English.
Second Mysore Immediate context:
war, Capture of Mahe by the English.
1780-84, In this war, the Marathas and the Nizam sided with the
English.
Main battle fought: Battle of Port Novo
Haider Ali was defeated.
Ended with the Treaty of Mangalore.
Was signed on the basis of mutual restitution of each other’s
territories.
Last British treaty with an Indian ruler on an equal footing
Result:
It was a drawn struggle.
Third Mysore war, Immediate context:
1790-92, Provided by Tipu's attack on Travancore.
In this war too, the Marathas and the Nizam sided with the
English.
ZGVmMjcxYTA3NGI1
Result:
Tipu Sultan lost his son and half of his territory to the
Company and its allies.
The company acquired Baramahal, Dindigul and Malabar.
2 sons of Tipu were kept as prisoners with Cornwallis.
Result:
It ended in a draw.
Treaty of Salbai gave the Marathas 20 years of peace.
Result:
The English had an edge over the Marathas.
Separate treaties were signed with Scindia, Bhonsle and
Holkar by the company which tore apart the Maratha
confederacy.
Result
Maratha forces were decisively defeated.
Peshwa's territories were annexed by the British.
The house of the Peshwa was extinguished.
ZGVmMjcxYTA3NGI1
First Burma war, Immediate Context - The Burmese military in its pursuit of
1824-26, rebels entered and occupied Assam and Manipur.
Lord Amherst Prepared to attack Chittagong.
These territories were claimed by the British.
Ended with the Treaty of Yandabo.
As per the Treaty, English regained control of Assam,
Manipur.
King lost most of his coast.
The king was forced to accept a British resident.
Second Burma war, Immediate Context - Two British captains were heavily fined
1852-53, by the Burmese government.
Lord Dalhousie Dalhousie decided to attack Burma on the pretext of storing
the dignity of the English back.
Result: The English annexed Rangoon and Pegu.
Ruin of old New class of landlords came up under the land revenue
zamindars and rise settlements of Warren Hastings.
of new land classes Merchants and moneyed classes came up who lived in
towns.
Had no permanent interest in land and tried to extort as
much revenue as possible.
Drain of wealth The continuous transfer of wealth from India to England has
been termed as drain of wealth.
Drain of Wealth from India
refers to all those payments which were made by India to
Britain without any adequate Returns.
Land revenue, Company's remittance to England, interest on
loans, bribes etc constituted drain of wealth.
Newspapers like Amrit Bazar Patrika, Hindustan Review and
Kayastha Samachar opposed the drain of wealth from India.
Poverty and famines Widespread poverty and starvation among the masses due
to British economic policies.
Rise of modern British constructed Railways, Post and Telegraph lines for
Industries under the better Imperial control.
British Many industrial capitalist classes and the working class
emerged due to this.
Grand Trunk Road from Calcutta to Delhi was started.
The first railway engine designed by George Stephenson
was put on rails.
ZGVmMjcxYTA3NGI1
Rise of new Indian Indian traders, money lenders and bankers emerged as the
bourgeoisie new Indian middle class.
These classes initially formed the westernized loyalists but
later they raised the banner of the National Movement in
second half of the 19th century. Example: Dadabhai
Naoroji.
Doctrine of Lapse The Doctrine of Lapse was an annexation policy followed widely
by Lord Dalhousie when he was India’s Governor-General from
1848 to 1856.
According to this, any princely state under the direct or indirect
(as a vassal) control of the East India Company where the ruler
did not have a legal male heir would be annexed by the company
As per this, any adopted son of the Indian ruler could not be
proclaimed as heir to the kingdom. This challenged the Indian
ruler’s long-held authority to appoint an heir of their choice.
Subordinate Alliance Subsidiary Alliance was basically a treaty between the British East
India Company and the Indian princely states, by virtue of which
the Indian kingdoms lost their sovereignty to the English.
It was framed by Lord Wellesley, the Governor-General of India
from 1798 to 1805. It was actually used for the first time by the
French Governor-General Marquis Dupleix
The Nawab of Awadh was the first ruler to enter into the
subsidiary alliance with the British after the Battle of Buxar.
However, the Nizam of Hyderabad was the first to accept a well-
framed subsidiary alliance.
Features of the Subsidiary Alliance Treaty
An Indian ruler entering into Subsidiary Alliance with the British
had to dissolve his own armed forces and accept British forces in
his territory.
He also had to pay for the British army’s maintenance. If he failed
to make the payment, a portion of his territory would be taken
away and ceded to the British.
ZGVmMjcxYTA3NGI1
In return, the British would protect the Indian state against any
foreign attack or internal revolt.
The British promised non-interference in internal affairs of the
Indian state but this was rarely kept.
The Indian state could not enter into any alliance with any other
foreign power.
He could also not employ any other foreign nationals other than
Englishmen in his service. And, if he were employing any, on the
signing of the alliance, he had to terminate them from his service.
The idea was to curb the influence of the French.
A British Resident was also stationed in the Indian Court.
The Indian ruler, thus, lost all powers in respect of foreign affairs
and the military.
He virtually lost all his independence and became a British
‘protectorate’.
Order in which the Indian States entered into Subsidiary Alliances
Hyderabad (1798)
Mysore (1799 – After Tipu Sultan was defeated in the Fourth
Anglo-Mysore War)
Tanjore (1799)
Awadh (1801)
Peshwa (Marathas) (1802)
Scindia (Marathas) (1803)
Gaekwad (Marathas) (1803)
Mercantile Phase This ‘mercantilist’ phase was marked by direct plunder and the
(1757-1813) East India company’s monopoly trade functioning through the
investment of surplus revenues in the purchase of Indian
finished goods for export to England and Europe.
During the mercantile phase the aim of all activity was to
accumulate wealth. In order to pursue a favourable trade, the
British company started aggressive policies in India.
New revenue settlements were imposed upon the agrarian
structure.
Free trade phase (1813- By the dawn of the 19th century, the British became an industrial
1860) power following Industrial Revolution in England. It was in need
of raw material to feed its industries. The emerging capitalist
class found the Company a stumbling block for its market.
During this period, India was converted rapidly into a market for
British textiles and a great source for raw materials. Traditional
handicrafts were thrown out of gear
The special feature of this policy was that it was a one way traffic
wherein British goods entered India virtually free while Indian
products entering Britain faced high tariffs.
Revenue and expenditure policies of the Britishers were also
exploitative in nature. Huge expenditure (expenditure on army,
pensions and salaries of Englishmen, etc.) incurred by the British
imperial power had been borne by Indians by paying high doses
of taxes.
Finance capital phase During this phase, finance-imperialism began to entrench itself
(1860 onwards) through the managing agency firms, export-import firms,
exchange banks, and some export of capital.
ZGVmMjcxYTA3NGI1
Educational Policies
Orientalist-Anglicism Controversy
The British East India Company officials wanted to maintain neutrality or non-intervention in
the sphere of religion and culture of the Indian society, after the acquisition of political
power in India in first half of 19th Century.
The reason behind this policy was partly the fear of adverse reaction and opposition to their
role by the indigenous people.
There was pressure from various quarters of British (missionaries, liberal, utilitarians) to give
up its position of neutrality and to take up the responsibility of promotion of education.
But, there was a conflict in the opinions which were divided on the issue that whether the
company should promote western or oriental education, giving rise to the Orientalist-
Anglicist controversy.
Orientalists
o The Orientalists led by Dr. H.H.Wilson and H.T. Princep advocated in favour of
Sanskrit, Arabic and Persian as the medium of education.
o Orientalists were guided by some practical considerations. They wanted to teach
the British officials the local language and culture so that they would be better at
their job. This was the prime objective behind the foundation of the Port William
College at Calcutta in 1800.
o The other motive was to develop friendly relations with the elites of the indigenous
society and to understand their culture. This was the main reason behind the
establishment of the Calcutta Madrassa and the Benaras Sanskrit College.
Anglicists
o The Anglicists led by Charles Trevelyan, Elphinstone advocated the imparting of
western education through the medium of English.
o The Anglicists were supported by most advanced Indians of the time, like Raja Ram
Mohan Roy who advocated for the study of western education as the “key to the
treasures of scientific and democratic thought of the modern west.”
Under the circumstances, the controversy between these two schools of thought was
referred to the Government by the General Committee of Public Instruction.
Lord Macaulay, the Law member to the Supreme Council of Calcutta was
appointed Chairman of the Committee of Public Instruction.
ZGVmMjcxYTA3NGI1
This famous minute finally settled the debate in the favour of Anglicists, that is, the limited
government resources were to be devoted to teaching of western sciences and literature
through the medium of English language alone.
Lord Macaulay was of the view that ” Indian learning was inferior to European learning”,
which was true as far as physical and social sciences in the contemporary stage were
concerned.
This policy was an attempt to create a system of education that educates only the upper
strata of society through English.
The Government opened a few English schools and colleges instead of a large number of
elementary schools, thus neglecting mass education.
The British planned to educate a small section of upper and middle classes, thus creating a
class “Indian in blood and colour but English in tastes, in opinions, in morals and in intellect”
who would act as interpreters between the government and masses and would enrich the
vernaculars by which knowledge of western sciences and literature would reach the masses.
Persian was abolished as the court language and English become the court language.
Printings of English books were made free and available at a very low price.
English education was allotted more funds as compared to oriental learning.
In 1849, JED Bethune founded Bethune School.
Agriculture Institute was established at Pusa (Bihar)
Engineering Institute was established at Roorkee.
In 1853, when renewal of the Company charter again came for the consideration, the British
Parliament examined the progress of education in India. The observations and suggested
reforms were issued as a Charter of Education, known as Wood’s Dispatch of 1854.
As you know soon after 1857 revolt, the East India Company was dissolved and the
government came directly under the British Crown. As a consequence, efforts were made to
consolidate the empire and education was somewhat neglected.
It was formed to evaluate the achievements of Wood Dispatch of 1854 under W.W Hunter in
1882.
It underlined the state’s role in the extension and improvement of primary education and
secondary education.
It underlined the transfer of control to district and municipal boards.
It recommended two division of secondary education-
o Literary up to university;
o Vocational for commercial career.
This was the first attempt to diversify school curriculum and introduce vocational education.
However, despite the specific recommendations and emphasis of the Hunter Commission on
commercial, vocational or non-literary education, neither the public nor the Govt.
appreciated the value of this practical suggestion and the recommendations were totally
ignored.
A new Commission was appointed in 1902 to examine the condition and prospects of the
universities established in British Raj.
The Commission recommended
o reorganization of university administration;
o strict and systematic supervision of the colleges by the university;
o stricter conditions of affiliation and major changes in curricula and examinations.
As a result of the recommendations of this Commission, secondary schools were brought
under the control of the Universities. Under the Indian Universities Act of 1904, schools had
to be recognized by the Universities and rules and regulations were framed for this purpose
In 1906, the State of Baroda introduced compulsory primary education throughout its
territories. On seeing this, the nationalists demanded the Government of India to implement
the same throughout the country.
However, in the government resolution on education policy of 1913, it refused compulsory
education. Instead it was accepted to remove illiteracy in the country.
Some of the other resolutions made by the government were:
o To urge provincial governments to provide free elementary education for the poor
and backward sections of the society
o Improve the quality of secondary education schools
o Establishment of universities in every province.
ZGVmMjcxYTA3NGI1
With the increase in the quantity of educational institutions, there was a deterioration in the
quality of the education. Thus, Hartog committee was established in 1929 to make
recommendations for the development of the education in India.
The recommendations of the Hartog committee were:
o Primary education should be given importance. It was against the hasty expansion
and compulsory education system.
o The commission criticised the indiscriminate admission of universities which led to
the lowering of its standards.
o Recommended establishment of selective system for admission
o Retention of average students and divert them into the courses leading to
commercial and industrial careers
The Committee also recommended diversion of more boys to industrial and commercial
careers at the end of the middle stage, where they should be prepared for specialized
education in technical and industrial schools.
The Committee also reviewed the problems relating to the training of teachers and the
service conditions of the secondary teachers.
In 1937, when the provincial governments were formed in seven provinces with the native
representation, they concentrated their attention on educational reforms.
In October 1937, an all-India National Educational Conference was held at Wardha and the
conference resolved to accept the proposals made by Mahatma Gandhi i.e.
o free and compulsory education be provided for seven years through mother tongue
on a nation-wide scale.
ZGVmMjcxYTA3NGI1
o The process of education throughout this period should centre around some form of
manual and productive work.
The conference expected that this system of education will be self sufficient and gradually,
will be able to cover the remuneration of teachers.
Accordingly, a committee under the chairmanship of Dr. Zakir Hussain was appointed. The
Committee prepared and submitted the first comprehensive national education scheme in
its report on December 2, 1937, which was popularly known as the Wardha Scheme or Basic
Education
o The basics of handicraft to be included in the syllabus
o First seven years of schooling to be an integral part of free and compulsory
education
o Teaching to be done in English medium only from class VIII.
Copyright © by IASbaba
All rights are reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or
otherwise, without prior permission of IASbaba.