Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Can We Consider The Manner of Translation of Carolina Malay On The Narrative Account of Santiago Alvarez A Primary Source of History

    Uploaded by

    Juan Alexandro
    47 views1 page
    The document discusses whether the translation of Carolina Malay of Santiago Alvarez's narrative account can be considered a primary source of history. It determines that Malay's translation is not a primary source, as she only translated the memoirs and did not directly experience the events herself. As the information in the translation was based on Alvarez's memoirs, which were the actual primary source, Malay's translation is deemed a secondary source.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Can We Consider the Manner of Translation of Carolina Malay on the Narrative Account of Santiago Alvarez a Primary Source of History

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document discusses whether the translation of Carolina Malay of Santiago Alvarez's narrative account can be considered a primary source of history. It determines that Malay's translation is not a primary source, as she only translated the memoirs and did not directly experience the events herself. As the information in the translation was based on Alvarez's memoirs, which were the actual primary source, Malay's translation is deemed a secondary source.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    47 views1 page

    Can We Consider The Manner of Translation of Carolina Malay On The Narrative Account of Santiago Alvarez A Primary Source of History

    Uploaded by

    Juan Alexandro
    The document discusses whether the translation of Carolina Malay of Santiago Alvarez's narrative account can be considered a primary source of history. It determines that Malay's translation is not a primary source, as she only translated the memoirs and did not directly experience the events herself. As the information in the translation was based on Alvarez's memoirs, which were the actual primary source, Malay's translation is deemed a secondary source.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    1.

    Can we consider the manner of translation of Carolina Malay on the narrative account of Santiago
    Alvarez a Primary Source of history?
    - No, it is not considered as a primary source of history. A primary source normally are the
    ones or the things that directly involved in a situation. Carolina Malay only translated the
    memiors and did not directly experienced the event. The information of the translated
    narrative was based on the primary source which was the memiors of Santiago Alvarez.
    Thus, the translation of Carolina Malay is now considered a secondary source.

    You might also like