You are on page 1of 2

Chapter seven

Principles 01
groundwater
flow and solute
transport

Although the mechanism of groundwater flow (7.2)


through porous media is weil understood, many
uncertainties exist about the flow of water and where a is the degree of nonlinearity of the flow
tr ansport of solutes in fractured rock s. This has (0.5 ~ a s 1).
acquired greater interest as low permeability Relativel y high hydraulic gradient may give
formations form potential repositories for high- rise to turbulent flow through large pores, solu-
level waste. tion cavities and wide fractures. In laminar
flow, the inertial forces are much smaller than
viscous forces. The transition from laminar to
7.1 Groundwater flow
turbulent flow depends on the Reynolds num-
ber (R e) which is a dimensionless number
7.1.1 Laminar and turbulent flow
expressing the ratio of inertial to viscous forces
Groundwater flow through various rock types act ing on the fluid (equation 7.3).
may be either laminar or turbulent depending on
their permeability and the hydraulic gradient. R = pVd = Vd (7.3)
In laminar flow, also known as viscous or e Jl V
streamline flow, the flow lines are parallel and
the velocity and direction of flow are constant. where p is the fluid density, V is the mean fluid
The turbulent flow is characterized by high velocity, d is the diameter of the pipe, J4 is the
velocities and the formation of eddies. In lam- dynamic viscosity and v is the kinematic vis-
inar flow the velocity of flow is proportional to cosity. In porous media, d can be replaced by
the first power of the hydraulic gradient (equa- the effective diameter, (de ) of sand grains which
tion 7.1). constitutes the aquifer (section 9.2 .1).
By considering porosity, 1] the Reynolds num-
V=KI (7.1) ber, Re can be expressed as (UNESCO, 1972)

But in turbulent flow, the velocity of flow will R = 1 Vd e (7.4)


be expressed as e 0.751] + 0.23 V

B. B. S. Singhal et al., Applied Hydrogeology of Fractured Rocks


125
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999
Principles of groundwater flow and solute transport

and by considering the intrinsic permeability (k) From experimental data, van Golf-Racht
instead of effective diameter (de ) , Re is given by (1982) showed that the transition from laminar
equation (7.5) (van Golf-Racht, 1982) to turbulent flow in fractures takes place at very
low va lues of Reynolds number (",,600).
Re = 5 x 10- V 1/ k
3
According to Louis (1974), the transition from
(7.5)
115 .5 V laminar (a = 1) to completely turbulent (a =
0.5) is quite progressive, the exponent slowly
Generally, the flow regime is laminar for Re changes from 1 to 0.5 as the Reynolds number
< 2000 and turbulent für Re> 2000 (Marsily, changes fo r instance from 100 to 2300 . Lee and
1986). Farmer (1993) indicated that the critical
In fractured rocks, it is difficult to determine Re ynolds number commonly lies between 100
the Reynolds number, since for a given type of and 2300, decreasing as the relative roughness
flow it can vary greatly from one point to of the fracture increases. The flow, therefore,
another along the same fracture. In fractured will change from laminar to turbulent condi-
rocks, the diameter of the pipe in equation (7.3) tion with increase in flow velocity, pore size,
can be replaced by the hydraulic diameter (D h ) sinuosity and roughness.
which in a plane fracture is exprcssed by

D, =4A/p (7.6) 7.1.2 Darcy's law


In 1856, Henry Darcy, a French hydraulic engi-
where A is the cross-sectional area of the frac- neer, inve stigated the flow of water through fil-
ture through which flow takes place and p is ters. His experiments demonstrated that the
th e outside perimeter of the cross-section area rate of Ilow, i.e. volume of water per unit time,
of the flow (Marsily, 1986). For a very long Q is (a) directly proportional to the cross-
fracture, D h is equal to twice its aperture, i.e. sectional area, A, and head loss, hL' and (b)
D h = 2a, and Re is given by the relation inversely proportional to the length of the flow
path, L (Figure 7.1), i.e,
R = 2Va (7.7)
e v Q _ A and _ hL (7.9)
L
The walls of a natural fracture will always
have a certain degree of roughness causing an By combining the above relations and intro-
additional drop in pressure and thereby influ - ducing proportionality constant (K) Darcy's law
ence the flow conditions. The relative rough- can be written as
ness, R, (dimensionless) is defined by
Q= KA hL (7.10)
(7.8) L
or
where R, is the mean height of the irregulari-
ties (asperities) in thc fracture. Some measured Q= KA dh (7.11)
va lues of R, lie in the range of 0.002 to 0.01. dl
However, as it is often difficult to measure
roughness in the field, the effect of roughness where K is the hydraulic conductivity of the
on groundwater flow is more of academic porous medium and dh/dl is the hydraulic
interest. gradient.

126

You might also like