Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mössbauer effect studies of Nd2Fe1 4B and related meltspun permanent magnet alloys
Appl. Phys. Lett. 45, 1248 (1984); 10.1063/1.95080
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
131.111.164.128 On: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 11:33:41
Study of magnetic properties and Mc;ssbauer effect of Pr-fe and me~t-spun
Pr-fe-B anoys .
L. R. K. Rotenberg, R. F. Oliveira, H. R. Rechenberg, and F. P. Missel!
Instituto de Flsica, Universidade de Siio Paulo, c.P. 20516, 01498 Siio Paulo, S.P., Brazil
We prepared samples of the intermetallic compound Pr2 Fe 17 that were free of segregated Fe and
measured the Mossbauer spectra as a function of temperature, obtaining T c = 301 ± 2 K.
Mossbauer spectra from samples of annealed Pr2 F<14 B powder show considerable complexity.
Melt-spun ribbons of Prls F~9 B6 , magnetized to 20 kOe, showed an intrinsic coercive field
Rei = 14.5 kOe at room temperature. Mossbauer spectra of melt-spun material show slight
differences with respect to those from annealed ingots. The origin of these differences is not yet
clear.
4127 J. Appl. Phys. 57 (1), 15 April 1985 0021-8979/85/014127-03$02.40 @ 1985 American Institute of Physics 4127
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
131.111.164.128 On: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 11:33:41
low value of the energy product. On the other hand, the
!", .-'. ./,. ,-. ..
.-."... ~~: eo: ""'.,/" '., :. . ..f "0,_• asymmetry of the hysteresis loop suggests that the 20-kOe
. ........ 0. ~; ..
.,,; .... external field was not large enough to saturate the ribbon.
Thus, higher magnetizing fields would probably improve the
§ 78K values obtained for Hei ,Brand (BH )mlU .
.D
o ..- '"
<1\
§
....... - ............ ,.,. 1f"I'i'8. \IIIIW -
MOSSBAUER SPECTROSCOPY
57 Fe Mossbauer spectra of the Pr 2Fe 17 phase are shown
o
U
...' 296K
in Fig. 3. The Curie temperature of this sample, as deter-
'. . mined by the coUapse of the magnetic hyperfine structure,
I I I I was Tc = 301 ± 2 K, higher than the value reported by
-3 0 3 6
mm/sec Strnat,14 Tc = 283 K. The spectrum at 78 K is very similar
to those reported by Levinson et al. IS and by Gubbens et al. 16
FIG. 3. Mossbauer spectra of the intermetallic compound Pr2Fe 17 at tem- except that the samples studied in Refs. 15 and 16 contained
perature indicated. a-Fe as wen as the Pr2 Fe l7 intermetallic phase. In our sam-
ples containing a-Fe in addition to the Pr2 Fe 17 phase (typi-
cally 15% of the total spectral area), Curie temperatures
showed the highest values of H ei • 13 The ribbons were ob- were enhanced, varying from 315 to 323 K.
tained by spinning in air onto a copper wheel rotating with a Room-temperature Mossbauer spectra of (a) powdered
surface speed - 17 m/sec. The ribbons so obtained were very Pr 2 Fe l4 B and (b) melt-spun ribbons of PrlSFe79B6 are
slightly oxidized on the outer surface. The x-ray diffraction shown in Fig. 4. A small contribution from a-Fe can be no-
pattern for the ribbon showed the same lines as in Fig. 1, with ticed in both spectra. The great similarity between these
a slight broadening and reduction in intensity, as would be spectra indicates that the ternary phase formed is most prob-
expected for small grains. ably the same, despite the differences in sample composition
and preparation. We do not observe a simplification of the
MAGNETIZATION Mossbauer spectrum in the boron containing material as was
Magnetization measurements were made with a vibrat- reported for the Nd-Fe-B alloys. to The most obvious differ-
ing sample magnetometer at room temperature. An exam- ences between the spectra is the greater relative intensity of
ple, for a Prl5Fe79B6 ribbon, is shown in Fig. 2. (Note that lines 2 and 5 of spectrum (b) in comparison to those of spec-
we are using rationalized cgs units where B = H + M. To trum (a). This might seem to be a consequence of preferential
obtain the magnetization in Gauss we used a density d = 7.6 orientation of Fe magnetic moments parallel to the ribbon
g/cm 3 , appropriate for a Nd-Fe-B alloy.6) The ribbon of Fig. plane. However, this ribbon was transformed into powder
2 was magnetized to 20 kOe from the virgin state and then M and the resulting MOssbauer spectrum also presented a
was recorded. In the present case we find Hei = 14.5 kOe, greater relative intensity for lines 2 and 5, similar to spec-
with a remanence Br = 5.8 kG and an energy product trum (b) of Fig. 4. Spectra at 78 K (not shown) are very simi-
(BH )max = 4.2 MG Oe. The low remanence and the unfavor- lar to those at 296 K, with effective fieJ.ds only 15% greater,
able second quadrant demagnetization curve account for the indicating aTe much higher than room temperature.
The observed complexity of the Mossbauer spectra is to
be expected, since neutron 6 and x-ray 7 diffraction data on
-. a-Fe
Nd2 Fe14 B reveal a complex crystallographic structure. Due
to the similarity of the powder patterns of the Nd and Pr
.- .. :.,".,
a
'.
.', .'.,
." '- C()tttpounds, we expect the Pr-Fe-B com.pound to also pos-
se~t, six inequivalent Fe sites. We are in th.e process ()ffitting
OUt spectra to determine the hyperfine parameters corre-
.'
.: sponding to those sites. These fits will help to decide whether
the differences observed in Fig. 4 are due to the slight compo-
-6 -3 o 3 6
mm/sec
sition differences or to the microstructure induced by mel.t
a-Fe spinning.
".
,
.... .-/ .1"'"" •
~
•J"..
.. CONCLUSIONS
"
..0 • ~ ,
....
~ b .: We prepared samples oO?r2 Fe 17 that were free of segre-
4128 J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 57, No.1, 15 April 1985 Rotenberg et a/. 4128
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
131.111.164.128 On: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 11:33:41
spectra from an annealed ingot and a melt-spun ribbon seem 6J. F. Herbst, J. J. Croat, F. E. Pinkerton, and W. B. Yelon, Phys. Rev. B
to differ with respect to the intensities oflines 2 and 5. These 29,4176 (1984).
1D. Givord, H. S. Li, and J. M. Moreau, Solid State Commun. SO, 497
differences will be the subject of future investigations. (1984).
8H. H. Stadelmaier, N. A. Elmasry, N. C. Liu, and S. F. Cheng, Mater.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Lett. 2, 411 (1984).
9C. B. Shoemaker, D. P. Shoemaker, and R. Fruchart, Acta Cryst. (in
The authors acknowledge the generous collaboration of press).
R. P. Guertin. This work was supported by FAPESP, 'OF. E. Pinkerton and W. R. Dunham, Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc. 29, 322
CNPq, and FINEP (Brazil). (1984).
IIQ. Johnson, D. H. Wood, G. S. Smith, and A. E. Ray, Acta Cryst. B 24,
274 (1968).
12A. E. Ray, Acta Cryst. 21, 426 (1966).
1M. Sagawa, S. Fujimura, N. Togawa, H. Yamamoto, and Y. Matsuura, J. HJ. J. Croat, J. F. Herbst, R. W. Lee, and F. E. Pinkerton, Appl. Phys. Lett.
AppJ. Phys. 55, 2083 (1984). 44,148 (1984).
2N. C. Koon and B. N. Das, J. Appl. Phys. 55, 2063 (1984). 14K. Stmat, G. Hoffer, and A. E. Ray, IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG-2, 489
3G. C. Hadjipanayis, R. C. Hazelton, andK. R. Lawless,J. AppJ. Phys. 55, (1966).
2073 (1984). 15L. M. Levinson, E. Rosenberg, A. Shaulov, S. Shtrikman, and K. Stmat, J.
4J. J. Becker, J. AppJ. Phys. 55, 2067 (1984). Appl. Phys. 41, 910 (1970).
5J. J. Croat, J. F. Herbst, R. W. Lee, and F. E. Pinkerton, J. Appl. Phys. 55, 16p. C. M. Gubbens,J. J. vanLoef,andK. H.J. Buschow,J. Phys. (Paris) 35,
2078 (1984). C6-617 (1974).
4129 J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 57, No.1, 15 April 1985 Rotenberg et al. 4129
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
131.111.164.128 On: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 11:33:41