Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lesson 2: Week 2
Introduction
ERP systems are continuously changing and evolving to provide the organization with a new perspective
on business processes and decision-making. Organizations are also continuously changing to match their
environments. Both need the flexibility to adapt to each other to be successful. System implementations
are generally very complex, time-consuming, and resource-intensive. Because of its size and impact on
the organization, an ERP system only increases this complexity; therefore, before implementing ERP, an
organization has to plan and understand the life cycle of these systems. This lesson will provide a quick
overview of the ERP implementation process, which begins with business process management (BPM).
BPM lays the foundation for the remaining chapters; the ERP implementation concepts introduced in this
section will be discussed later.
Learning Outcomes
At the end of the lesson, the students should be able to:
Understand the evolution of information systems and their historical role in organizations,
leading to systems integration and, eventually, enterprise resource planning (ERP).
Comprehend the ethical, global, and security challenges while implementing an ERP system
and overview ERP vendors and industry trends.
Learn about ERP systems and their evolution, components, and architecture. Understand the
benefits and drawbacks of implementing ERP systems and how they can help an organization
improve its efficiency and worker productivity
Business Process Management
Business process management is the understanding, visibility, and control of business processes. A
business process represents a discrete series of activities or tasks that span people, applications,
business activities, and organizations. BPM has a prescribed process or methodology that should be
followed to help an organization document its business processes and understand where they are being
used throughout its business. The initial stage of BPM is to create an "as-is" process map that defines the
current process. The as-is process is then used as a baseline for determining where the process may be
improved. However, simply documenting the current process does not give the business managers
control over the process. The real value of BPM comes from gaining visibility and control of the business
process.
ERP system implementations are very risky, and using a well-defined project plan with a proven
methodology will assist in managing those risks. In addition, there must be a strong well-communicated
need to change from the existing information systems/applications to an ERP system before starting any
ERP development or implementation. There should also be clear and well-defined business objectives
written and communicated to the organization. Finally, the project methodology needs to be documented,
reviewed, and fully understood by everyone involved in the project once objectives are outlined.
An implementation with considerable modifications to the ERP software package, sometimes referred to
as "chocolate" implementation, can increase the chances of success with the users because the package
has been customized based on user requirements; however, modifications increase the investment in the
system and introduce higher implementation risk. In a purchased system like ERP, modifying the system
means that every modification will be addressed each time the system is upgraded. It is like paying for
the modification over and over again. Therefore, most purchased ERP systems today are minimally
modified (or as-is) to protect the investment in the system. This is sometimes called a "vanilla"
implementation. Every ERP vendor upgrades their system regularly, adding functionality, fixing problems,
and generally keeping the product current with the ever-changing technology innovations to remain
competitive. Product life cycles are shown in Figure 2.3.
Before selecting a vendor, the organization must carefully evaluate its current and future needs in
enterprise management systems. This needs assessment can begin very simply by looking at the
organization's size in terms of the number of employees that will be accessing the ERP applications.
Next, the assessment must look at the organization's industry and the functional areas that the ERP
application will be supporting. In addition, it must review the organization's existing hardware, network,
and Software infrastructure and, finally, the resources (i.e., money and people commitment) available for
the implementation. The criteria developed from this needs assessment can help the organization narrow
down the vendors to a select few (i.e., three or four). These vendors should be invited to submit their bids
for the project. During this phase, vendors should be asked to install their application (sandbox) on the
company's IT infrastructure and make it available to potential users for testing. In addition, the vendor
needs to be evaluated on the following.
Business functions or modules supported by their Software
Features and integration capabilities of the Software
Financial viability of the vendor as well as the length of time they have been in business
Licensing and upgrade policies
Customer service and help desk support
The total cost of ownership
IT infrastructure requirements
Third-party software integration
Legacy systems support and integration
Consulting and training services
Future goals and plans for the short and long term
ERP Vendors
Key players dominating the global ERP software market include ABAS Software AG, CDC Software Inc.,
Consona Corporation, Epicor Software Corporation, Industrial and Financial Systems AB, Microsoft,
NetSuite Inc., Oracle Corporation, Plex Systems, Inc., QAD Inc., Ramco Systems, The Sage Group plc,
SAP AG, Unit 4 Agresso NV, and Visma AS, among others. This vast market can be grouped into three
tiers, as shown in Table 2-1 below.
Table 2.1 ERP Vendors
Tier 1 Tier II Tier III
SAP Epicor ABAS
Microsoft Dynamics CDC Software Activant Solutions Inc.
Oracle Sage Bowen and Groves
Oracle e-Business Suite Infor Compiere
Oracle—JD Edwards IFS Exact
Oracle-Peoplesoft QAD NetSuite
Lawson Visibility
CGS
ansa World Consona Syspro
SAP - Founded in 1972, SAP is the recognized leader among ERP vendors, claiming the largest
current market share. Its solutions are for all types of industries and every major market. SAP is
headquartered in Walldorf, Germany, with 12 million users, 88,700 installations, and more than
1500 partners. It employs more than 32,000 people in more than 50 countries. Its products include
mySAP Business Suite, SAP NetWeaver, and solutions for small and midsize companies (e.g.,
SAP Business One and SAP All-in-One) (www.sap.com).
Oracle - Oracle technology can be found in nearly every industry worldwide and the offices of 98
of the Fortune 100 companies. Oracle is the first software company to develop and deploy 100
percent Internet-enabled enterprise software across its entire product line, including databases,
business applications, and application development and decision support tools. Oracle provides
solutions divided by industry category and promises long-term support for customers of
PeopleSoft, which was acquired in 2004. They have 40,000 professionals working in more than
100 countries around the world. Their three business principles are Simplify, Standardize, and
Automate. Oracle is headquartered in Redwood Shores, California (www.oracle.com)
INFOR - This company is the world’s third-largest provider of enterprise software, with
approximately $2.1 billion in revenue. It delivers integrated enterprise solutions in the supply chain,
customer relationship and supplier management, workforce, asset management, product life
cycles, operational and business performance, and more. Headquartered in Alpharetta, Georgia,
Infor is the tenth-largest software company globally, with 8,100+ employees, 70,000 customers,
and offices in 100 countries worldwide (www.infor.com/infor).
MICROSOFT Formerly Microsoft Business Solutions or Great Plains, Microsoft Dynamics (MD) is
a comprehensive business management solution built on the Microsoft platform. MD integrates
finances, e-commerce, supply chain, manufacturing, project accounting, field service, customer
relationships, and human resources. The key benefit of MD is that users across your organization
can use skills and products that they already know (e.g., a Web browser, Microsoft Office System
products, and Microsoft SQL Server) to access and communicate information managed within the
system. Another benefit of MD is vertical integration—Microsoft strategy provides an ecosystem of
Software on the back office and front office for an end-to-end solution. In addition, MD is easy to
deploy and configure (www.microsoft.com/dynamics).
LAWSON - Founded in 1975, Lawson provides industry-tailored software solutions that include
enterprise performance management, distribution, financials, human resources, procurement,
retail operations, and service process optimization. Lawson is headquartered in St. Paul,
Minnesota, and has offices and affiliates serving North and South America, Europe, Asia, Africa,
and Australia (www.lawson.com).
SSA GLOBAL - SSA Global acquired Baan in 2004 and doubled the company’s size globally.
They claim to offer solutions that accomplish specific goals in shorter time frames and are more
efficient with time. SSA Global is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, with offices all over the world
(www.ssagt.com)
EPICOR - This company provides enterprise software solutions for midmarket companies around
the world. The company claims to have solutions to various needs, whether a customer is looking
for a complete end-to-end enterprise software solution or a specific application. In addition, it
provides solutions for a limited number of specific industries, including nonprofit, distribution,
manufacturing, and hospitality. Epicor is headquartered in Irvine, California (www.epicor.com).
Summary
Several ERP vendors are competing for an organization's business today. The current vendors include
SAP, Oracle, Infor, SSA Global, Microsoft Dynamics, and Epicor. Before purchasing a vendor-developed
ERP system, an organization must identify and document its needs and its vision of the future. The
selection of a system must be based on these needs and how well a vendor meets those needs now or in
the future. There are many ERP system implementation success stories, but the ones that reach the
news often fail. It is essential to learn from both. Success or failure is sometimes based on something
very small. To successfully implement an ERP system, an organization and its management must clearly
understand the implementation process. The key to this is the application of an ERP life cycle and
methodology throughout an implementation. A methodology brings about a process to arrive at well-
thought-out decisions.
References:
Motiwalla, L.et.al (2012). Enterprise System, Second Edition