The document discusses the history of agrarian reform in the Philippines. It describes how, under Spanish and American rule, land ownership was controlled by large landlords and farmers struggled for land rights. The Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) was enacted in 1988 to redistribute public and private agricultural lands to farmers and landless farmworkers. CARP prohibited land transfers for 10 years and mandated landlords retain no more than 7 hectares, buying excess land to sell to farmers. Agrarian reform in the Philippines is important to the economy as it can increase agricultural productivity, farming incomes, and alleviate rural poverty.
The document discusses the history of agrarian reform in the Philippines. It describes how, under Spanish and American rule, land ownership was controlled by large landlords and farmers struggled for land rights. The Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) was enacted in 1988 to redistribute public and private agricultural lands to farmers and landless farmworkers. CARP prohibited land transfers for 10 years and mandated landlords retain no more than 7 hectares, buying excess land to sell to farmers. Agrarian reform in the Philippines is important to the economy as it can increase agricultural productivity, farming incomes, and alleviate rural poverty.
The document discusses the history of agrarian reform in the Philippines. It describes how, under Spanish and American rule, land ownership was controlled by large landlords and farmers struggled for land rights. The Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) was enacted in 1988 to redistribute public and private agricultural lands to farmers and landless farmworkers. CARP prohibited land transfers for 10 years and mandated landlords retain no more than 7 hectares, buying excess land to sell to farmers. Agrarian reform in the Philippines is important to the economy as it can increase agricultural productivity, farming incomes, and alleviate rural poverty.
Agrarian reform is popularly defined as “the distribution of public and private
agricultural lands, regardless of produce and tenurial arrangement, to landless farmers and regular farmworkers, to include support services” (AFA & AsiaDHRRA, 2005). The agrarian system in the Philippines has long been a combative issue and one that is often preceded by some form of instability and violence. For a long period, the agrarian system of the Philippines was being controlled by the large landlord. The small farmers in the Philippines were struggling for their rights to land and other natural resources. The Agrarian reform in the Philippines seeks to solve the centuries- old problem of landlessness in rural areas. During the Spanish Government, they are abuse and unfair to the farmers because the farmers are not allowed to own land. They are only allowed to work for Spaniards wherein it is unfair for them because of its look like they are a slave in their homeland. Filipino have debts in Spanish authorities they can only pay their debts through agricultural products where they sell them at a very low price or surrender their products to the Spanish where Spanish resell it at a high price. The Spanish government developed a new form of ownership which is the hacienda system this system is ordering landholders to register their landholding but due to registering land is too expensive where Filipino can't afford it the Spanish is the one who can register their land that's why Spanish take advantage to have the opportunity to register the land in their names. That is the same thing in the American period land ownership did not improve but it gets worsened because even there is no limit on the size of landholding it can only apply to those who can afford to register their land and acquire to fixed their titles. In terms of payment for their debts, the farmers are forced to surrender their land. But In 1986, Corazon Aquino’s presidential campaign put forth a land reform first priority—“Land to-the-Tiller”—slogan. The land reform commission was formed and, in July 1987, Aquino proclaimed the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP), and Congress passed the CARP in 1988. The major purpose of the land reform program was to transfer land to actual cultivators (Estudillo et al., 2000). The CARP was enacted to redistribute public and private agricultural lands to farmers and landless farmworkers. The CARP’s vision was to have equitable land ownership. It prohibited any form of transfer of land for 10 years and mandated landlords to retain 7 hectares of land. Additionally, under the CARP, any form of transfer of land awarded under the CARP was prohibited; lands exceeding 7 ha were bought by the government and sold to landless farmers. Gordoncillo (2012) reported that the CARP was a major intervention to affect rural development in the Philippines. This period aims to allow the farmers to have ownership unlike the period of Spanish and American where they use their power for their will. At this time tenancy in the Philippines is equal or 50-50 where 50% for the farmers and 50% for the owner of the land. They pay their debts either paying cash or paying agricultural it's up to them how they settle their debts unlike before they are only allowed to pay their debts by crops. The kind of government before is different especially when they implementing law the Spanish and American period are implementing law where they are the one who will benefit while the government or our leader now are not only thinking for the benefit he/she will get but the benefit of his/her citizen. The hard work of the farmers today is worth it because they get what should for them because the government is giving the rights of farmers . Agrarian reform in the Philippines has a great part in our economy because if we use our land right the agricultural productivity has the potential to increase farming income and alleviate poverty in rural areas. Rice is the single most important agricultural crop in the Philippines and is, therefore, a major source of income for millions of Filipino farmers.