Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER 2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
3300 and 10,000 M-1cm-1, respectively. It indicates that to generate high level
of OHᵒ radicals in a solution needs strong photon absorbers and high
concentration of H2O2, but in PACO process, low pressure mercury vapor
lamps with a 254 nm peak emission are used to generate OHᵒ radicals by
direct photolysis.
Table 2.1 Oxidizing species and oxidizable compounds (Ghaly et al, 2014)
(a) Relative oxidizing power of some oxidizing species and (b) Oxidizable
compounds by OHᵒ radicals
(a) (b)
Oxidizing Oxidizing
Group Components
Species Power
Hydroxy Formic, gluconic, lactic, malic, propionic,
2.05 Acids
radical tartaric
Benzyl, tert-butyl, ethanol, ethylene
Atomic
1.78 Alcohols glycol, glycerol,isopropanol, methanol,
oxygen
propenediol
Acetaldehyde, benzaldehyde,
Ozone 1.52 Aldehydes formaldehyde, glyoxal, isobutryaldehyde,
trichloroacetaldehyde
Benzene, chlorobenzene, chlorophenol,
Hydrogen creosote, dichlorophenol, hydroquinone, p-
1.31 Aromatics
peroxide nitrophenol, phenol, toluene,
trichlorophenol, xylene, trinitrotoluene
Aniline, cyclic amines, diethylamine,
dimethylformamide,
Permanganate 1.24 Amines
ethylenediaminetetraaceticacid,
propanediamine, n-propylamine
Chlorine 1.00 Esters Tetrahydrofuran
21
UV % of
S. Dye and
Structure lamp colour Reference
No. Class
power removal
Direct red
2 x 15 Mahmoodi et
1 80 (tetra 100
W al. (2005)
azo)
Muruganandh
Reactive am and
4 --- 93.47
orange 4 Swaminathan,
(2004)
Basturk and
Reactive 100
5 99 Karatas,
blue 181 mW
(2015)
Beikmohamm
Basic
6 50 W 98 adi et al.
yellow-28
(2016)
23
UV % of
S. Dye and
Structure lamp colour Reference
No. Class
power removal
Reactive
7 16 W 99%
black 5
Bali et al.
Direct (2004)
8 16 W 98%
yellow 12
Direct red
9 16 W 70%
28
Galindo & Kalt (1998) have reported that the effective colour
removal efficiency of dyes solution by PACO process was takes place in an
acid medium (pH≈ 3-4), but the process fails at alkaline pH due to the fact
that decomposition of hydrogen peroxide lead to oxygen and water.
Optimized Percentage of
S.
Dye concentration of colour AOP Process Reference
No.
oxidant removal
Direct Red Mahmoodi et al.
1 300 mg/l 100% UV/TiO2/H2O2
80 (2005)
Reactive
2 24.5 mmol/l 99.58% UV/H2O2
Yellow 84
Reactive Neamtu et al.
3 24.5 mmol/l 99.53% UV/H2O2
Red120 (2002)
Reactive
4 24.5 mmol/l 99.82% UV/H2O2
Black 5
Acid Blue
5 46.53 mmol/l 96.66% UV/H2O2 Shu et al. (2005)
113
6 Acid Black 1 21.24 mmol/l 90% UV/H2O2 Shu et al. (2004)
Muruganandham &
Reactive
7 10 mmol 93.47% UV/H2O2 Swaminathan
Orange 4
(2004)
Beikmohammadi et
8 Yellow 28 25 mg/l 97.47% UV/H2O2
al. (2016)
Reactive Basturk & Karatas,
9 500 mg/l 99% UV/H2O2
Blue 181 (2015)
Reactive
10 25 mmol 99% UV/H2O2
Black 5
Direct
11 25 mmol 98% UV/H2O2 Bali et al. (2004)
Yellow 12
Direct Red
12 25 mmol 70% UV/H2O2
28
Reactive
13 30 mmol 98.99% UV/H2O2 Zuorro et al. 2013
Green 19
25
Arslan et al. (1999) and Ince (1999) have reported that the colour
removal efficiency of textile dyes by PACO process gets increased on
increasing the effective dose hydrogen peroxide up to a “critical” level as
shown in Table 2.3. It is evident from the Table 2.3 that the critical level for
the different dyes vary depends upon many factors such as complexity of the
dye structure, concentration of the dye solution and intensity of the UV light
and so on. Higher concentration of peroxide acts as a radical scavenger while,
lower concentration of peroxide generate insufficient quantity of hydroxyl
radicals (OHᵒ) consumed by dyes and dye auxiliaries and this leads to slower
rate of oxidation of organic dyes.
Arslan & Isil (2001 & 2002) have shown that the treatment of
textile wastewater is not effective in PACO oxidation unless a preliminary
treatment is introduced to produce sufficient OHᵒ to observe a significant
colour and COD reduction. Many researchers have documented that even at
50 mmol of H2O2 concentration, raw textile effluent does not show any
significant degradation and COD removal is negligible.
wastewater and thus the electrical energy dose at each treatment level is
calculated as the energy consumption (EE/O) of the lamp. The EE/O is
defined as the number of kWh of electrical energy required to reduce the
concentration of a pollutant in a unit volume of contaminated water. Higher
EE/O value indicates that it is more difficult and more costly to remove the
pollutant relative to those with lower EE/O values.
% Colour
S. Energy
Process Dye Optimized condition removal Reference
No. Consumption
efficiency
For US = 633.79 and
Malachite [Dye] 0 = 5 mgL−1 Behnajady et al.
1 US/UV/H2O2 for US/UV/H2O2 = 100%
Green [H2O2]0=400 mgL−1 (2009)
19.98 kWhm−3
2 Acid Orange 7 1.341 kWhm-3
3 Acid Orange 8 -5
[Dye]0 = 9 x 10 M 1.561 kWhm-3
Daneshvar et al.
UV/H2O2 Acid Orange [H2O2]0 = 4.98 x10-2 >95%
4 M 2.177 kWhm-3 (2005)
52
5 Acid Blue 74 1.165 kWhm-3
[Dye] 0 =10ppm Daneshvar et al.
6 UV/H2O2 Rhodamine B 26.6 kWhm-3 72%
[H2O2]0 =450ppm, (2008)
[Dye]0 =30ppm Aleboyeh, et al.
7 UV/H2O2 Acid Orange 7 2.696 kWhm−3 100%
[H2O2]0 = 285ppm (2008)
[Dye] 0 =20ppm
UV/ZnO/ Acid Orange Daneshvar et al.
8 [ZnO]0=160ppm 172 kWh/m3 90%
H2O2 7 (2007)
[H2O2]0=10 mmol
Reactive black [Dye]0=30mg/L Marandi et al.
9 UV/H2O2 59.25 kWh/m3 84.34%
B [H2O2]0=500mg/L (2013)
[Dye]0 =10ppm
10 Basic Blue 3 7.67 kWh/m3 95.03 %
[H2O2]0 = 1.2 g/l Kasiri and
UV/H2O2
Acid [Dye]0 =10ppm 3
Khataee, (2011)
11 5.76 kWh/m 98.16%
Green 25 [H2O2]0 = 1.2 g/l
hence the energy consumed for the treatment process. Table 2.4 consolidated
the energy consumption of the treatment of the different textile dyes with its
optimal conditions. The energy consumption during the treatment process
may be increased due to the nature of the dye auxiliaries used at the time of
dyeing of fabric materials. Since some of the dye auxiliaries may be act as
radical scavengers and reduced the formation of the oxidizing species.
Table 2.5 PACO used for the treatment of different industrial effluents
% of
S. UV Light % of COD
Industrial Effluent colour Reference
No. intensity removal
removal
Industrial
wastewater
Mahvi et al.
1 containing 6.3 mW/cm2 --- 69.7%
(2012)
high amounts of
refractory organics
Oil recovery Dincer et al.
2 12 W --- 55%
industry wastewater (2008)
Peerez et al.
3 Coffee wastewater UV/H2O2/O3 --- 87%
(2007)
Bleach effluent of Subashini &
4 pulp and paper 400 W 52% 59% Kanmani
industry (2013)
Abdel-Aal et
5 Tannery wastewater 150 W --- 85%
al. (2015)
Pharmaceutical Azizi et al.
6 50 W --- 87.5%
wastewater (2016)
Pieczykolan
7 Landfill leachate 15 W --- 74.6%
et al. (2012)
Sahunin et al.
8 Textile wastewater 60 W 52% 90%
(2006)
15 fold diluted Arslan Alaton
9 reactive 25 W 100% --- et al. (2002)
dyebath effluent
Nagel-
Textile industry
10 250 W 73% 77% Hassemer et
effluents
al. (2011)
2.2 ELECTROCOAGULATION
et al. 2008). Hydrogen produced in cathodes can help mass particles float and
come out of water (Ghosh et al. 2008a; Yahiaoui et al. 2011). Daneshvar et al.
(2006) have proposed two mechanisms for the production of the metal
hydroxide during electrocoagulation process.
Mechanism 1:
At the anode
At the cathode
Overall reaction
Mechanism 2:
At the anode
At the cathode
Overall reaction
S. Electrode & % of
Dye and Class Structure Reference
No. Exp.Conditions removal
SS-SS, Fe-Fe
(pH:7, CD: 110
Reactive A/m2 for SS, 130
Yuksel et
1 Orange 84 and A/m2 for Fe, cond. 66, 76
al. (2013)
double azo 3000 lS/cm, initial
dye conc. 100
mg/L)
Al-Al (pH
6; NaCl = 2 g/L;
Direct red 81 Aoudj et
3 initial dye conc. 50 98
and double azo al. (2010)
mg/L; electrolysis
time 60 min.)
Al-Al (CD=
0.25 mA/cm2
Bomaplex red initial conc = Yildiz
8 99
CR-L 600 mg/L, pH = (2008)
5.0,
CaCl2 and)
Al-Al (CD:
100 A/m2,
initial Conc.:
Levafix orange Kobya et al.
9 250 mg/L, time: 95
and mono azo (2006)
15 min,
conductivity:
750 S/cm)
Fe-Fe (CD =
4.575mAcm−2;
time = 5 min; Sengil and
Reactive Black
10 initial conc. 98 Ozacar
-5 and diazo
=100mgL−1; (2009)
T=298K;
NaCl=3gL−1)
dye removal efficiency varies depending on the nature of the dye and the
electrode materials used.
% of Colour
S. Current Electrode &
Dye removal Reference
No. density Exp.Conditions
efficiency
Senthilkum
SS (pH 8 and CD =
1 Reactive red 120 50A/m2 98 ar et al.
50 A/m2)
(2010)
SS-SS, Fe-Fe (pH:7,
CD: 110 A/m2 for SS,
Reactive Orange Yuksel et
2 130 A/m2 66 & 76 130 A/m2 for Fe, cond.
84 3000 lS/cm, initial dye al. (2013)
conc. 100 mg/L)
SS-SS (pH 11.5 CD:
Reactive yellow Kabdasli et
3 220 A/m2 100 22mA/cm2 NaCl
145 40g/L) al. (2009)
Fe-Fe (CD = 4.575
mAcm−2; time = 5 Sengil and
4 Reactive Black -5 45.75 A/m2 98 min; initial conc. Ozacar
=100mgL−1; T=298K;
(2009)
NaCl=3gL−1)
Al-Al (pH
6; NaCl = 2 g/L; initial
Aoudj et al.
5 Direct red 81 18.75 98 dye conc. 50 mg/L;
electrolysis time 60 (2010)
min.)
Electrode Energy
S.
Dye consumption consumption Electrode Reference
No.
(kg/m3) (kWh/m3)
Reactive Orange
1 0.060 2.02 SS
84 Yuksel et al.
Reactive Orange (2013)
2 0.190 2.80 Fe
84
Ghosh et al.
3 Crystal Violet 0.497 10.01 Al
(2008)
1.2 kg Fe/ kg 3.3 kWh/ kg Kobya et al.
4 Remazol 3B Fe
dye dye (2010)
Arslan-
Simulated reactive
5 --- 1.8 & 3.6 Al & SS Alaton et al.
dyebath effluent
(2009)
Synthetic Merzouk et
6 0.016 -- Al
wastewater al. (2011)
Egg processing Sridhar et al.
7 --- 16.24 Al
industrial effluent (2014)
Naje et al.
8 Textile wastewater 0.100 8.49 Al
(2015)
Kobya et al.
9 Textile wastewater 0.163 & 0.107 0.63 & 0.70 Fe & Al
(2007)
Textile dye
10 0.05 2.43 SS
wastewater Yuksel et al.
Textile dye (2013)
11 0.28 2.38 Fe
wastewater
% of
S. Industrial Current
pH Electrode COD Reference
No. Effluent density
removal
Hospital
12.2 Mahajan et
1 operation 6.75 Fe-Fe 100
mA/cm2 al. (2013)
theatre
Paint Akyol
2 35 A/m2 6.95 Fe-Fe 93
manufacturing (2012)
Landfill 15.9 Top et al.
3 7.00 Al-Al 45
leachate mA/cm2 (2011)
Pulp and 15 Sridhar et al.
4 7.00 Al-Al 90
Paper mA/cm2 (2011)
15 Yavuz et al.
5 Dairy industry 7.00 Fe-Al 79
mA/cm2 (2011)
Tannery 20 Babu et al.
6 6.80 Fe-Al 52
industry mA/cm2 (2007)
Tannery Feng et al.
7 1A 9.80 MS-MS 68
industry (2007)
Potato chips 300 Kobya et al.
8 4-6 Al-Al 76
manufacturing A/m2 (2006a)
Textile (RuO2-Ti) Muthukumar
9 5 A/dm2 12.0 85
industry – Ti et al. (2004)
Textile 200 Bayramoglu
10 11.0 Fe-Fe 76
industry A/m2 et al. (2004)
38
C.I. Reactive Blue 194 and C.I. Reactive Blue 222 have similar
molecular structure as given in Figure 2.1 and they are expected to exhibit
similar behavior during the treatment process. Kiran et al. (2013) have
reported that Reactive Blue 222 dye is subjected to photo-fenton’s oxidation
39
Figure 2.1 (a) Reactive Blue 194 Figure 2.1(b) Reactive Blue 222
Figure 2.2 (a) C.I. Direct Red 7 Figure 2.2 (b) C.I. Direct Blue 15
Figure 2.3 (a) C.I. Acid violet 17 Figure 2.3(b) Crystal violet
42
Ghosh., et al. (2008) have noted that 99.0% of COD removal and
99.75% of colour removal of crystal violet by electrocoagulation using Al
electrode at initial dye concentration of 100 mg/L with the current density of
1112.5 A/m2, solution conductivity of 1.61 S/m and initial pH of 8.5 at the
end of 1hr of operation.
The present work has been carried out to investigate the treatability
of Photo Assisted Chemical Oxidation (UV/H2O2) and Electrocoagulation
process on three different aqueous textile dye solutions. The performance of
the two processes is validated using simulated dye bath effluent. Finally,
43
feasibility of the two processes is tested for the real time textile industrial
effluents. To achieve the desired result, the present study has been started
with the following objectives.