Professional Documents
Culture Documents
'dnhlffl
Infection Control Risk Assessment Design Considerations
Design Element Facility/Patient Care Unit Type Guidelines Section or Other Reference
Water/Plumbing Systems
Emergency eyewash and emergency Hospital 2.1-5.1.2.2, 2.1-5.7.2.2, 2.1-8.4.3.8, 2.2-3.4.8.22, 2.2-
shower stations 3.1 0.9.2, 2.2-3.11.4.2
Hand-washing stations (plumbed Hospital 2.1-2.3.4, 2.1 -2.4.2.2, 2.1-2.4.2.3, 2.1 -2.8.7, 2.1 -2.8.11'
sinks) and hand sanitation 2.1-2.8.12, 2.1-3.4.2.5, 2.1-4.1.2.2, 2.1-4.1 .3.2, 2.1 -4.2.8.7,
dispensers 2.1-5.1.2.2, 2.1-5.1.2.3, 2.1-5.2.2.1' 2.1-5.2.2.2, 2.1-5.7.2.2,
2.1-7.2.2.8, 2.1-8.3.5.1, 2.1-8.4.2.5, 2.1-8.4.3.2
Hand scrub facilities (scrub sinks) Hospital 2.1-2.8.6, 2.1 -8.3.5.1, 2.1-8.4.3.2, 2.1-8.4.3.6, 2.2-2.9.11.8,
2.2-3.1.3.6, 2.2-3.3.2.5, 2.2-3.3.6.6, 2.2.3-4.2.3
1f1N5fll
Categorization of Hospital Sites by Exterior Ambient Sound with Design
Criteria for Sound Isolation of Exterior Shell in New Construction
A B c 0
1
By definition, t he day·night average sound level (Ldnl includes t he A-weighting and nighttime penalty.
2
lo1 is the sound level exceeded 1 percent of the time.
3
1n the absence of a local code, emission of equipment sound to adjacent res idential properties shall be considered. Exterior patient seating
areas are generally acceptable for Category A sites, marginally acceptable for Category B sites, generally not acceptable without special
acoustic consideration for Category C sites, and generally not acceptable at all for Category D sites.
( 'The exterior shell composite ratings are for closed windows. Opening windows effectively reduces shell composite OITC or STC ratings to 10
to 15, depending on the amount windows are opened. Consideration shall be given to whether windows would be opened and for how long
[ and under what circumstances, and t he potential impact of open windows should be identified in the design documentation.
5
The exterior shell composite sound transmission ratings for interior spaces that are not acoustically sensitive (e.g., corridors, at riums,
stairways) can be reduced by as much as 10 dB, but should be no less than OITCc 25 or STCc 35. Special consideration shall be given to interior
spaces that are more sensitive to noise than a typical examination room (e.g., a teleconferencing space, telemedicine room, or an auditorium)
[
t hat may req uire special consideration to determine an appropriate OITCc or STCc rating of the exterior facade.
6
For rooms with a roof-ceiling assembly as part of the composite shell, the complete shell (including the roof) shall meet t he requ irements of
t he table in all cases. Where significant sound sources are located above the roof level (such as aircraft or mechanical equipment on roofs)
or the roof is exposed to sound from adj acent noise sources, either the minimum composite OITC or STC of the complete shell (including the
roof) shall be 5 points greater than shown in t he table or the minimum composite OITC or STC of the roof·ceiling assembly itself shall be at
least 10 points greater than shown in t he table wit h the fa~ade composite rating (walls and windows) meeting the minimum requirements in
t he table.
Note: Also see appendix table A1.2-b (Approximate Distance of Noise Sources for Use in Categorization of Hospitals by Exterior Ambient
Sound).
Distance from nearest highway (ft.) > 1000 250-1000 60-249 < 60
Slant distance from nearest aircraft flight track (ft.) > 7000 3500-7000 1800- 3499 < 1800
Distance from nearest rail line (ft.) > 1500 500-1500 100-499 < 100
Notes:
1. This table can be used to approximate noise impact on a hospital based on very conceptual conditions. Actual sound levels at a site can vary
dramatically based on traffic volume and frequency of use of the transportation system as well as topological conditions and other features
out of the control of the design team or health care organization. A more accurate assessment of a site's exterior noise exposure should be
made either by performing a sound level survey for a period sufficient to properly characterize the noise impacts or by using any number of
transportation noise estimation tools, such as software models recognized by the federal government or the noise assessment guidelines in
The Noise Guidebook published by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
,2.These criteria should be considered when selecting a location for new construction and expansion projects.
•mn5Fi'
Minimum Design Room-Average Sound Absorption Coefficients (a)
Atrium 0.10
Office 0.15
_ 3
Operating room
_ 3
Class 3 imaging room
1¢Mifll
Maximum Design Criteria for Noise in Interior Spaces Caused by Building Systems1
Patient room 40 45
Examination/treatment room 40 45
Procedure room 40 45
Operating room' 50 55
Support Areas
Teleconferencing room 2S 30
Auditorium 30 35
Administrative Areas
Private office 40 4S
•mntttll
Design Criteria for Minimum Sound Isolation Performance Between Enclosed Rooms1
Public Areas
1
Addit ional spaces shall be added based on the building program.
2The STC values stated assume the need for normal speech privacy as shown in Table 1.2-7 (Design Criteria for Speech Privacy for Enclosed
Rooms and Open-Plan Spaces)-except at corridor walls with doors-assuming a background sound level of at least 30 dBA. When selecting
assemblies based on their tested or published STC ratings, it should be noted that laboratory STC test reports can, in general, be considered
accurate to +I- 2 STC points. Consequently, an assembly with a tested or published STC rating as low as 2 points below the stated minimum
may be considered acceptable.
3
1n cases where greater speech privacy is required between patient care rooms when both room doors to the connecting corridor are closed,
the composite demising wall performance requirement shall be STCc 50.
4
Th is is the performance required for the wall around the door. Note that sound isolation in these instances will be limited by the door's
performance (e.g., STC 20 for a close-fitted 5-PSF door).lt is up to the faci lity to determine if doors require a higher acoustic performance or if
ful l perimeter gasketing and bottom seals should be required. Doors are not required to be sound sealed to maintain the STC rating, although
a facility may choose to do so for specialty patient environments such as bereavement rooms, consultation rooms, sleep therapy roo ms, etc.
sRelaxation of STC 60 ratings shall be permitted if compliance with room noise requirements is achieved with lower performance
constructions. See Table 1.2-5 (Maximum Design Criteria for Noise in Interior Spaces Caused by Building Systems).
6
Electronic masking shall provide a maximum background level of 48 dBA.
7This requirement is for operating rooms without doors directly communicating with the MRI scanner room as the STC value shown cannot be
achieved when there is a door between an adjacent OR and an MRI scanner room. However, where there is a connecting door, attention shall
be paid to the door to assure sound isolation when the MRI is used independently from t he operating room.
Note: This table shall not be applied to mobile/transportable medical units.
liMtllffl
Design Criteria for Speech Privacy for Enclosed Rooms and Open-Plan Spaces 1• 2
level Metrics
Defining standard ASTM E1130 ASTM E1130 ANSI S3.5 ASTM E2638
Defining standard ASTM E1130 ASTM E1130 ANSI S3.S ASTM E2638
'The ind icated AI and 511 val ues shall be considered the maximum accepted values. The indicated PI and SPC va lues shall be considered the
minimum accepted values.
' Equivalence among these metrics, as indicated, has been demonstrated. However, some of the metrics may not be suitable for a particular
space. The referenced standards indicate that PI and AI are appropriate for use in open-plan spaces and that SPC is appropriate for closed-plan
spaces. The referenced standard for 511indicates it may be used for either type of space.
3
Confidential speech privacy is not readily achievable in open-plan spaces due to the lack of barriers, low ambient sound levels, and typical
voice effort.
l$0hjfj:l
Maximum Limits on Floor Vibration Caused by Footfalls in Hospitals
Notes
1. Higher vibration criteria are less stringent and vice versa.
2. The vibration criteria in this table do not apply to renovation projects unless new equipment being installed has more stringent vibration
limits.
3. The vibration criteria in this table do not apply to mobile/transportable medical units.