You are on page 1of 1

Dolot vs. Paje, etc., et al.

,
G.R. No. 199199, August 27,2013

Facts

This is a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court assailing the Order
dated September 16, 2011 and Resolution3 dated October 18, 2011 issued by RTC of Sorsogon, Branch 53 on
Continuing Mandamus, Damages and Attorney’s Fees with Prayer for the Issuance of a Temporary
Environment Protection Order (TEPO).

Petitioner Maricris Dolot, et al, filed the aforesaid petition with the RTC of Sorsogon alleging that
mining operations conducted by Antones Enterprises, Global Summit Mines Development Corporation and
TR Ore puts the municipality of Matnog in environmental dangers and despite this fact, Sorsogon Governor
Raul Lee and his predecessor Sally Lee issued to the operators a small-scale mining permit. Similarly, it was
alleged that representatives of PMS and DENR did nothing to protect the interest of the people in same
community, thus, respondents violated Republic Act (R.A.) No. 7076 or the People’s Small-Scale Mining Act
of 1991, R.A. No. 7942 or the Philippine Mining Act of 1995, and the Local Government Code. Dolot, et al
primarily prayed for the shutdown of said mining operations through issuance of TEPO as well as the
rehabilitation of the mining sites and the return of the iron ore mined in the area.

The case was referred by the Executive Judge to the RTC of Sorsogon, Branch 53 being the designated
environmental court. However, the case was summarily dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The RTC averred
that SC Administrative Order (A.O.) No. 7 and Admin. Circular No. 23-2008 limit the power of such court to
try and hear the case as its territorial jurisdiction was limited to violations of environmental laws within the
boundaries of Sorsogon City and the neighboring municipalities of Donsol, Pilar, Castilla, Casiguran and
Juban.

Issue
Whether the RTC-Branch 53 has jurisdiction to resolve Civil Case No. 2011-8338.

Ruling

The SC held that such reasoning is plainly erroneous and that RTC cannot solely rely on SC A.O. No.
7 and Admin. Circular No. 23-2008 and confine itself within its four corners in determining whether it had
jurisdiction over the action filed by the petitioners. As reiterated by the SC, jurisdiction is the power and
authority of the court to hear, try and decide a case, is conferred by law. It may either be over the nature of
the action, over the subject matter, over the person of the defendants or over the issues framed in the
pleadings. BP Blg. 129 or the Judiciary Reorganization Act of 1980 also states that jurisdiction over special
civil actions for certiorari, prohibition and mandamus is vested in the RTC, hence, original jurisdiction shall
be exercised by the RTCs. Both the SC AO and AC merely provide for the venue where an action may be
filed. The Court does not have the power to confer jurisdiction on any court or tribunal as the allocation of
jurisdiction is lodged solely in Congress and the same cannot be delegated to another office or agency of the
Government.

The high court further emphasized that venue relates only to the place of trial or the geographical
location in which an action or proceeding should be brought and does not equate to the jurisdiction of the
court as it is aimed to accord convenience to the parties, as it relates to the place of trial, and does not restrict
their access to the courts. Therefore, RTC’s motu proprio dismissal of the case on the ground of lack of
jurisdiction is incorrect. While it appears that the alleged actionable neglect or omission occurred in the
Municipality of Matnog and as such, the petition should have been filed in the RTC of Irosin, it does not
warrant the outright dismissal of the petition by the RTC as venue may be waived. Moreover, the action filed
by the petitioners is not criminal in nature where venue is an essential element of jurisdiction. With these, the
SC granted the petition and directed the Executive Judge of the Regional Trial Court of Sorsogon to transfer
the case to the RTC of Irosin, Branch 55, for further proceedings with dispatch.

You might also like