Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hugo Guillen
Week 4
For this analysis I interviewed my mentor who designs a large portion of the school PD. With regard
to PD for staff my mentor stated that PD needs to be authentic and driven by the desire to support the school’s
mission to create an environment of rigorous and relevant instruction for students. In regard to PD needing to be
authentic Barnet and Farrah (2021) state that, “Some of it (PD) was fantastic, but too often the one-size-fits-all
presentations we attended failed to meet our—and our colleagues’—needs. At times we were overwhelmed by
new information; at other times we were bored or uninspired. Above all, we were short on time and anxious to
go create and plan. We felt frustrated and stressed, and we weren’t alone.” PD needs to have a clear focus for
students and teachers alike for it to be successful. My mentor noted that PD needs to have a strong foundational
need within the building and that teachers need to see the value in it, or it simply becomes an exercise in futility.
This effective framing of the need for the PD falls upon the admin team.
A principal’s role in and action in terms of the development of PD within the secondary education
setting is a difficult task given the wide array of different subject areas and sheer number of staff. Such is the
case at my school site that has nearly 1,500 students and nearly 80 members on staff between teachers a support
staff. Holland notes that principals in her study, All the principals said that they wish they could spend more
time in classrooms helping teachers. While all of the principals acknowledged the time constraints within which
they work, one high school principal also mentioned limitations imposed by his lack of knowledge in some
content areas. Therefore, he questioned his ability to provide useful instructional assistance to teachers in those
content areas.” (Holland, 2009) Because of this difficulty, my mentor mentioned that much of the PD structure
is supported by the use of strong mentors within the building to help foster PD especially with regard to novice
or new teachers.
Teachers Roles
A core philosophy of my mentor is the use of the shared leadership model as much as possible within
the building. In speaking to the importance of shared leadership withing the building, Lambert states that,
“Today's effective principal constructs a shared vision with members of the school community, convenes the
conversations, insists on a student learning focus, evokes and supports leadership in others, models and
participates in collaborative practices, helps pose the questions, and facilitates dialogue that addresses the
confounding issues of practice.” By using a shared leadership model, principals are able to leverage strong
teacher leaders to analyze the needs of their colleague sand to be able to collaborate with all staff to formulate
effective OD opportunities. At my site, most PD is delivered by teacher leaders, and this helps not only to
identify effective PD opportunities but also helps to increase teacher buy-in as they staff sees “one of their own”
instructing them.
One of the main drivers of PD at my site is the school improvement plan (CIP). This carefully crafted
document is created by the admin team near the end of the previous year based on applicable data that is
collected through a variety of methods. One strong focus of the current CIP is the need to reduce major behavior
incidents and suspensions. Wit that in mind, a strong focus of the PD for the year is focused on the
implementation of the districts Restorative Justice model in schools. The PD sessions that have been planned
Research-Based Instruction
As noted by the National Education Policy Center, “research shows that restorative justice programs
have helped reduce exclusionary discipline and narrow the glaring racial disparities in how discipline is meted
out in schools.” (Walker, 2020) When analyzing the schools current PD emphasis we see that Restorative
Justice has plenty of research showing its effectiveness. The school has avoided using a top-down that, “that
downplay collaborative decision-making among all stakeholders, teachers, and other school staff
implementation” (Walker, 2020) and instead has adopted a bottom-up approach that encourages staff
Evaluating PD Program
When I personally try to objectively evaluate my sites PD program, I believe while it does have some
great strengths it does have some areas for improvement. The school that I work at it is new school that was
able to essential hand pick its staff when it opened. It was a highly desirable site that had hundred of applicants.
The admin team was able to select incredibly talented and experienced teachers. This is a great luxury as many
if the teachers are up to date with many of the best practices. The school also has a strong shared leadership
model that revolves around the PLC model to effectively address many of the PD initiatives. But it also feels
that the school moving forward would need to better articulate the Cip withal staff and involve them in the
development of the CIP. If staff was more heavily integrated with the CIP a more authentic understanding of the
vision and mission for the CIP, the schools PD could be articulated to staff in a more effective manner.
References
Farah, K., & Barnett, R. (2021, August 12). Teachers need more relevant PD options.
more-relevant-pd-options
Lambert, L. (2002, May 1). A Framework for Shared Leadership. ASCD. Retrieved August 24,
Walker, T. (2020, January 30). Restorative Practices in Schools Work ... but They Can Work
https://www.nea.org/advocating-for-change/new-from-nea/restorative-practices-schools-
work-they-can-work-better#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20NEPC%20brief,school
%20climate%20and%20student%20development.