Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Se desea determinar la fuerza estática equivalente con la cual se debe diseñar un marco
de un piso, sometido a la acción del sismo ocurrido el 18 de mayo de 1940, en Imperial
Valley California.
c k F ( t)
x'' x' x =
m m m
2 k c
= =
m 2 m
2 F ( t) F ( t) m u''g ( t)
x'' 2 x' x = = = u''g ( t)
m m m
2 k 2 2
x'' 2 x' x = u''g ( t) Eq. 1 T= =
m
__________________________________________________________________________
The values of the acceleration of the earthquake were recorded every 0.02 seg and 1560 data were
sampled. The durationn of the earthquake was 31.18 seg.
The approximate excitation period of the earthquake was 0.22 seg. Te 0.22 seg
1.5
ag
0
1.5
3
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32
t
Time in Seconds.
Structure Data.
2
x'' 2 x' x = u''g ( t) Ec. 1
2
=
T
Mass m 8000 kg
5
Stiffness k 4.9965 10 N/m
k 2
Damping: 0.05 7.9 rad/s T T 0.8 seg
m
The response of the structure was obtained by solving Eq. 1 using a numerical method on the EXCEL
sheet El Centro Wilson.xlz, displacement, velocity and acceleration are graphically displayed obtained
in the EXCEL sheet.
El Centro Wilson.xlz
x Variables sent to the Excel sheet:
v Stiffness k, is stored in the Excel variablel k
Damping , is stored in the Excel variablel
epsilon
a Period T, is stored in the Excel variablel T
Hoja de cálculo Delta time T, is stored in the Excel variablel deltaT
15
10
5
xi
vi 0
10
15
20
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
ti
Time in Seconds
displacement (cm)
velocity (cm/seg)
300
ai
0
300
600
0 5.33 10.67 16 21.33 26.67 32
ti
________________________________________________________________________
Mass m 8000 kg g 9.81 m/s2 Design Seismic Force
5
Stiffness k 4.9965 10 N/m
Damping 0.05
xmax 4
FD = k xmax FD k FD 4.02 10 N
100
FD
Design earthquake force FD FD 4094 kg
g
2
xmax
cs cs 0.51 cs m 4094 kg
100 g
06 Response Spectrum.mcd 4 PhD Rafael Cedeño Rosete.
Suppose you want to design a set of different structures to withstand the earthquake under study.
Each of the structures has different values of mass (m) and stiffness (k), thus defining a natural period T,
different for each of them. The damping value () would be the same for all.
For each of these structures, Eqc. 1 nust be solved with its respective value of period T and obtain the
maximum value displacement.
The following table shows the results obtained from the maximum displacements of structures. The row ze
corresponds to the natural period T in seconds of the structures and row one corresponds to the maximum
displacement in cm obtained by the Eq. 1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
T
ER 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
1 0 0.2 0.6 1.7 3.1 5.7 6.8 6.3 8 10.7 11.2 9.8 9.2 8.9 8.9
The following graph shows the results obtained from 60 different structures cwith periods from o to 6 se
in 0.1 second increments.
32
24
Espx
j
16
0
0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4 3 3.6 4.2 4.8 5.4 6
Tn
j
Natural Period Tn
_________________________________________________________________________
A more convenient alternative way to determine the seismic design force Fs is by using the Pseudo
Acceleratión "A" response spectrum.
2 k 2 2
Fs = k xmax = k = m Fs = m xmax
m
2
Pseudo acceleration: A = xmax
W A
Fs = m A Fs = A cs = Fs = cs W
g g
2
Pseudo acceleration A xmax A 502 cm/s2
cs = Pseudo-Aceleration/g (A/g)
1
0.9
0.8
cs = A/g (adimensional)
0.7
0.6
Asj
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4
Tn
j
Natural Period Tn
If for a given earthquake, the seismic coefficient cs = A/g ( pseudo acceleration A divided by g ) is
obtained corresponding to each natural period "T" of all posible structures, the graph " T vs A/g " is calle
the Pseudo Acceleration Response Spectrum.
________________________________________________________________________
Mass m 8000 kg
5
Stiffness k 4.9965 10 N/m
FD cs m FD 4080 kg
k 2
T Period T 1.2 seg
m