Special Supplement: Commercial Banking -

Lessons To Learn In Managing Risk - As

Commercial Banks Begin To Suffer The Same
Risk Problems As Investment Banks, Risk
Management Is Becoming More Important In The
Sector. Heather McKenzie Reports On The
Biggest
McKenzie, Heather . The Banker ; London (Dec 2007): 1.

ProQuest document link

ABSTRACT
Although the subprime mortgage problems are not directly related to the business of commercial lending, there are
lessons to be learned. Robert McDowall, senior analyst, Europe, at financial services consultancy TowerGroup,
says that commercial banks should be aware of the issues that the subprime crisis raised and learn from them -
particularly as investment banking products are being packaged and distributed on a wider basis to commercial
banks. Although there are formulae for valuing intangible assets, they are models, and as McDowall points out, the
subprime mortgage crisis was caused in large part by banks marking to their models, rather than to the market.
The issues that affected the investment banking world are now permeating the commercial banking market, he
says. Credit risk - the risk that a counterparty may not be able to meet its obligations - is the main risk in the
commercial banking world. McDowall says that, in general, commercial banks have undertaken their own credit
assessments and then supplemented them with reports from rating agencies.

FULL TEXT
 
Risk management has not always been an equal player at the table in commercial banking, but Basel II and, more
recently, the subprime mortgage crisis in the US have pushed risk management up the agenda.
Although the subprime mortgage problems are not directly related to the business of commercial lending, there are
lessons to be learned. Robert McDowall, senior analyst, Europe, at financial services consultancy TowerGroup,
says that commercial banks should be aware of the issues that the subprime crisis raised and learn from them -
particularly as investment banking products are being packaged and distributed on a wider basis to commercial
banks.
Asset valuation
"Most commercial banking involves secured lending against something that is tangible, like property or assets. It is
up to the bank to ensure it knows where the assets are and to value them periodically. However, more and more,
banks are lending to organisations that do not have tangible assets and when you lend against intangibles (such
as intellectual property or patents), it is more difficult to value those assets continually and accurately," says Mr
McDowall.
Although there are formulae for valuing intangible assets, they are models, and as Mr McDowall points out, the
subprime mortgage crisis was caused in large part by banks marking to their models, rather than to the market.
"The issues that affected the investment banking world are now permeating the commercial banking market," he

PDF GENERATED BY PROQUEST.COM Page 1 of 5

says.
Credit risk - the risk that a counterparty may not be able to meet its obligations - is the main risk in the commercial
banking world. Mr McDowall says that, in general, commercial banks have undertaken their own credit
assessments and then supplemented them with reports from rating agencies.
"There is no substitute for a bank doing its own credit assessment and evaluation, and given what has happened in
the investment banking world with securitisation, the investment banks that are currently blaming the ratings
agencies for their problems should have been doing their own assessment work."
Basel II worry
However, Mr McDowall says there is a problem in Basel II, in that it advises financial institutions to be directed by
the valuations of credit rating agencies. "This is an interesting dynamic. The events of the past couple of months
would suggest that the credit risk pillar of Basel II will be undermined by the lack of confidence in the ratings
agencies. Will the apparent reduced confidence in ratings agencies spill over into the commercial lending sector?"
In the immediate aftermath of the subprime crisis, credit ratings agencies were called to account. In Europe, the
Committee of European Securities Regulators called a meeting with credit ratings agencies to discuss their role in
the subprime mortgage crisis. It also conducted a public consultation, which ended on September 10, on how
structured finance instruments are rated by the agencies.
Subprime hindsight
Christian Nelissen, a partner at PA Consulting, says that with hindsight it is easy to see a number of steps that risk
managers should have taken during the subprime mortgage crisis. "There were severe credit risks, and you would
think that some institutions would have priced these into their models," he says.
"The lesson here is probably that despite the fact that risk management is becoming more important and more
sophisticated, it is still ignored from time to time."
One of the problems, according to Mr Nelissen, is that risk managers are often considered "Cassandras" (in Greek
mythology, the prophet whom no-one believed) and others in a bank think that their job is to put things on hold.
However, he thinks that attitudes are changing. "Ten years ago, risk managers were like policemen - they would
stop certain things happening and they would also do reporting. Now there is more coaching done by risk
managers: helping people in the business to understand the risks they face and how to deal with them in an
appropriate way."
Risk survey
In a survey it conducted in 2004, on risk-based management in the banking sector, which Mr Nelissen says is still
relevant, PA Consulting found that although most banks had put in place risk governance structures, many still
needed to ensure that their risk strategies were well articulated and aligned with the needs of the business. "Before
they close other gaps in their risk management toolsets and practices, many banks would be wise to clarify their
risk strategies and ensure that they are aligned with resource plans for Basel compliance," he says. Only 43% of the
banks surveyed had quantified their risk appetites. Most banks' boards have an active involvement in setting the
risk strategy, but with varying degrees of involvement in its execution, he says.
Hypercompetitive lenders
Jorgen Roed, head of UK sales and marketing at EDB, a Nordic IT supplier, says that as profit margins decrease,
commercial lenders are under more pressure to take greater risks to protect or increase revenues. "At the same
time, loyalty among customers is decreasing, which puts further emphasis on new customer acquisition. This, in
turn, forces greater risk as lenders become hypercompetitive," he says. "Basel II will offer commercial lenders a
number of opportunities to remain competitive.
"Many lenders will adopt risk-adjusted pricing, which will allow them to achieve IRB advanced status and, as such,
allow them to set aside lower levels of capital. To achieve this, commercial lenders will require greater levels of
transparency, control and accountability, and the ability to capture more extensive and efficient risk rating models,"
he says.
Craig van Ness, a partner at PA Consulting, says that sophisticated financial institutions have been spending a

PDF GENERATED BY PROQUEST.COM Page 2 of 5

great deal of time and money on retooling their back office and credit risk processes to develop IRB capabilities.
Those institutions are now seeking to leverage their investments by extending the approach into the front office
and loan origination.
"We have seen large groups of commercial banks pulling together their historical loan loss and recovery
information, and derive from that some benchmark statistics to create models that enable them not just to
benchmark and calibrate IRB under Basel, but also to use those tools to push them into the origination workflow
so the lending officers have at their disposal a different way of looking at potential credit," says Mr van Ness. "It's a
more qualitative look at the risk profile with much greater granularity."
Such tools include workflow management, document management and decision support applications.
Tool use and performance
The PA Consulting survey found that if banks want to increase their shareholder returns significantly, they should
focus their efforts on expanding their use of basic risk management tools before developing more sophisticated
ones. It found that banks with less sophisticated models that were used extensively outperformed those that had
sophisticated models but failed to use them properly.
"This is a trap that people are still falling into," says Mr Nelissen. "It is great to have all the bells and whistles but
unless you are making decisions that are based on the tools, they are irrelevant." Mr van Ness says that in creating
tools that are so complex, a bank may well be undervaluing the experience and expertise of the lending officers.
Technology versus policy
Mr McDowall questions how big technology's role is in commercial banking credit risk management. "Technology
can provide information but this is an area of business that is more concerned with policy issues. However, the
more investment banking products are being packaged and sold to commercial banks, the more need there will be
to integrate risk management systems to manage and monitor the risk of these products as well as to assess their
value," he says.
PA Consulting's clients are focused on three areas when it comes to risk management, says Mr Nelissen. First,
they want a more quantified approach, eager to "crunch the numbers" in their portfolios to work out trends and are
trying to apply some of the same principles to portfolio management as they do to high-end loans, he says. The
work they have undertaken on Basel II enables banks to determine how much capital they have, which they can
then take to the front line and process risks more finely.
"Ultimately, this means the relationship managers get better at taking risks because they are using all the good
stuff that has been done at the back end," he says.
He adds that Basel has led to a greater focus on portfolios, and some commercial banks are moving into active
portfolio management rather than reactive management. This means that rather than looking at a portfolio "every
few weeks", they can more readily work out where they can get a better price and reject risks.
"The trend we have seen since the introduction of Basel II is that banks are adopting or are trying to get more
quantitative approaches to credit risk," says Mr van Ness. "This requires the compilation of a large database of
empirical information after the fact, from which they will derive a basis to determine the risks of particular types of
loan assets with particular types of counterparties.
"The main objective is to achieve transparency and certainty about risk pricing. By pushing these tools into the
front office, banks also get lower uncertainty about the quality of assets in their portfolio and therefore the
riskiness of the portfolio."
Operational risk
Opinion is divided about the importance of operational risk - the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed
internal processes, people and systems, or from external events - in commercial banking. EDB's Mr Roed says that
operational risk is a consideration, particularly as commercial lending operations grow, resulting in higher volumes
of transactions.
"To meet their requirements, lenders need systems that are able to handle the associated administration and to
capture the process structure that has to be followed through the full loan lifecycle. This will make the bank less

PDF GENERATED BY PROQUEST.COM Page 3 of 5

dependent on people, reducing the risk of human fallibility as well as increasing transparency and auditability," he
says.
However, Mr McDowall says that although there is operational risk in commercial banking, the low level of
transactions means that the operational impact is relatively small compared with that in the investment banking
world.
The PA Consulting survey found that banks' attitudes to operational risk were much more conservative than those
to credit or market risk. The report said: "The main area in which banks may need to develop their risk tools is in
operational risk. However, there are some aspects of credit and market risk for which many banks should also
consider developing tools:
- Most banks have at least the basic credit risk tools but many lack tools for analysing credit risk at the portfolio
level.
- Although most banks have well-developed sets of market risk tools, there is still some scope for the development
of sensitivity measures and earnings- at-risk tools.
- Banks have achieved much less sophistication in their operational risk toolsets, although a large proportion have
plans to develop in this area."
The report added that banks could increase their use of tools for all three risk types - credit, market and operational
- to support business decisions. "Although many banks have a good range of risk tools, many would benefit from
using these tools more widely in decision making for all risk types," it said.
Risk limit
Most banks used their credit and market risk tools in setting and monitoring risk limits, far fewer used their
operational risk tools for this purpose, said the report.
Moreover, many banks used their credit risk tools for pricing transactions, though fewer used them for structuring
transactions and fewer still used their operational risk tools for these purposes, it said. Only a small proportion of
banks used their risk tools - of any risk type - to allocate economic capital, said the report.
PA Consulting also found that many banks' risk data, systems and reporting lacked the structure and functionality
to enable fully informed decision making. Mr Roed agrees with this point. "If commercial lenders are to be
successful in taking greater risks, far greater levels of data accuracy, process transparency and risk modelling are
required," he says.
"To date, the small and medium-sized commercial lending operations have been deficient with regards to risk
modelling. This needs to be urgently rectified to embrace risk-adjusted pricing, which will allow them to forecast
risk and respond accordingly. Moving to risk-adjusted pricing will allow smaller and medium-sized commercial
banking operations to compete more effectively," he adds.

DETAILS

Subject: Problem solving; Rating services; Commercial credit; Banking industry; Economic
crisis; Credit ratings; Credit risk; Banks; Risk management; Investment banking;
Subprime lending; Commercial banks; Financial institutions; Portfolio management;
Ratings &rankings

Business indexing term:
Subject: Rating services Commercial credit Banking industry Economic crisis Credit
ratings Credit risk Banks Risk management Investment banking Subprime lending
Commercial banks Financial institutions Portfolio management; Industry: 56145 :
Credit Bureaus 52211 : Commercial Banking 52311 : Investment Banking and
Securities Dealing

Location: Europe

PDF GENERATED BY PROQUEST.COM Page 4 of 5

 Classification: 9175: Western Europe; 8110: Commercial banking services; 3300: Risk management;
3200: Credit management; 56145: Credit Bureaus; 52211: Commercial Banking;
52311: Investment Banking and Securities Dealing

Publication title: The Banker; London

Pages: 1

Number of pages: 0

Publication year: 2007

Publication date: Dec 2007

Publisher: The Financial Times Limited

Place of publication: London

Country of publication: United Kingdom, London

Publication subject: Business And Economics--Banking And Finance

ISSN: 00055395

CODEN: BNKRB2

Source type: Trade Journal

Language of publication: English

Document type: Feature

ProQuest document ID: 225654120

Document URL: http://ergo.southwales.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/trade-

journals/special-supplement-commercial-banking-lessons/docview/225654120/se-
2?accountid=15324

Copyright: (Copyright 2007 THE BANKER. All rights reserved.)

Last updated: 2021-09-10

Database: Accounting, Tax &Banking Collection

LINKS

Database copyright  2022 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved.

Terms and Conditions Contact ProQuest

PDF GENERATED BY PROQUEST.COM Page 5 of 5