Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
Individual outcomes are called (sample) points.
Briefly denoted, * + (in
terminology of sets, points elements)
Quite often we are interested in some particular
event that contains certain sample points as its
members.
Essentially, an event is a subset of S.
Probabilities are assigned to events.
Basics of set theory
2
Recall that an event is a subset
Set
Element
Equality of sets
Subset
Size of a set (finite, countably infinite, countable,
uncountably infinite, etc.)
# countable: finite or countably infinite
Union of sets ( )
3
Intersection of sets ( )
Difference of sets
Complement of a set (A), denoted as or ̅, in an
universal set (denoted as U)
In probability, the universal set is the sample space.
Empty set (denoted as )
Def: Two sets A and B are said to be disjoint (aka.
mutually exclusive) iff .
DeMorgan’s rules
4
First rule: ( )
Second rule: ( )
Generalization to multiple-set cases is
straight-forward.
Def: Consider a class: * +. F is called a
sigma algebra if it satisfies the conditions:
1.
2. If , then
3. If for , then
5
Komogorov’s axiomization: Let S be the sample space.
For each (well-behaved) event A of S, a real number,
denoted by P(A), is associated with it. If P satisfies the
axioms below, then it is a probability and P(A) is said to
be the probability of A:
Axiom 1: P(A) 0
Axiom 2: P(S) = 1
6
Axiom 3: ( ) ∑ ( ), for every
collection of pairwise mutually exclusive events , ,
, … of S.
The requirement of events being “well-behaved” is
always met when S is countable.
Precisely speaking, the “well-behaved” event means
that it is a set out of a sigma algebra.
When S is countable, all events are subsets out of a
sigma field.
7
Even when S is uncountable, for practical purposes,
all events considered in this course are well behaved.
When S is some set of real numbers, then the
associated sigma field consists of:
1. a finite interval
2. complement of any finite interval
3. union of any countably number of finite intervals
4. intersection of any countably number of finite
intervals
8
For a countable sample space S, it suffices to assign a
probability ( ) to each point such that
( ) and ∑ ( ) . Then, a probability
measure P on S is defined by assigning the probability of
each event A as ( ) ∑ ( ).
If all sample points are equally likely, then ( )
( )
– this is the proportion interpretation of
( )
probability.
9
Thm (#1): ( )
Prf: Noting that (in words, and
are mutually exclusive) and applying A3 (i.e. Axiom 3),
we obtain ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Thm (#2): Consider , , …, : (pairwise) mutually
exclusive events. Then, ( ) ∑ ( ).
Prf: First augment the given sequence of events with
, , …. And then, apply A3 and
Thm (#1).
10
Thm (#3): Given an event A, we have ( ) ( ).
Prf: # By definition of complement, we have
.
# By A2, we have ( ) ( )
# By definition, and are mutually exclusive.
# By Thm (#2), we have ( ) ( ) ( )
# Therefore, ( ) ( ) (QED)
Thm (#4): For any event A, ( )
Prf: # By A1, we have ( ) and ( )
11
# By Thm (#3), ( ) ( )
# Therefore, ( ) (QED)
Thm (#5, aka. the addition rule for probabilities):
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Prf: Check [Tijms, pp.26-27]
Graphically, we can adopt this kind of
visualization
Can be generalized to the case of
( )
12
Ex: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
(Similar visualization as the case of two events)
(Some kind of inclusion-exclusion)
Ex (inclusion-exclusion): [Tijms, p.37, Example 1.19]
Consider sequence of events: , , ,…
Def: This sequence is increasing iff .
Def: This sequence is decreasing iff .
Limit of increasing/decreasing sequences of events:
13
For increasing seq.,
For decreasing seq.,
Thm (Continuity of probability): If a sequence , ,
, … is either increasing or decreasing, then
( ) ( )
Prf: Check [Tijms, p.24]
Ex: [Ghahramani, p.28, Example 1.20]
14