Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Competing On The Edge
Competing On The Edge
Companies that compete on the edge are distinctive in three major ways
1. Strategy as Temporary, Complicated, and Unpredictable
Traditional: long-term defensible positions or sustainable competitive advantages (low
cost/differentiation/specific core competences around technologies, brands, organizational skills)
E.g. Intel: “only the paranoid survive” -- advantage is temporary and strategy must be constantly
shifting and evolving to surprise and confound the competition
Play multiple options (a variety of moves, with varying scale) and expect strategy to shift over time.
3. Time Matters -- Rhythm & Pacing, Past & Future, Time Metrics, not just speed
Traditional: ‘static’ (time is not relevant), react to events and changes
Time pacing: anticipating and setting the pace of change
E.g. Starbucks: set the pace of store openings per year
Long strategic time frame:
Stretch out the past: capitalising on the past to chase new opportunities
E.g. Lonely Planet Publications: Multi-pronged growth
(blend previously developed material with new information, split products into different
versions, expand distribution network etc.)
Probing farther into the future: keeping scale relatively small, carefully calculates the learning
potential from each probe, and zealously measures outcomes
E.g. Bill Gates & Microsoft: scientific experiments
(lots of small investments in fledgling companies, various strategic partnerships, small bets on
competing technologies etc.)
Traditional strategies are static and highly planned, thus inadequate in high velocity and hotly competitive
markets.
Key performance driver is the ability to change, not just in rare and massive transformations, but rather
relentlessly over time.
A competing on the edge strategy is much more dynamic: inherently temporary, complicated, and
unpredictable. Time is central, and organisation drives strategic moves.