Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Plaintiffs,
APPENDIX IN SUPPORT OF
vs. CHRISTOPHER DOYLE’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA, BOARD OF
REGENTS FOR THE STATE OF IOWA;
BRIAN FERENTZ; and CHRISTOPHER
DOYLE
Defendants.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Declarations
1
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 2 of 533
Depositions
Other Materials
2
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 3 of 533
Respectfully submitted,
THOMAS J. MILLER
Attorney General of Iowa
PROOF OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing instrument was served
upon each of the persons identified as receiving a copy by delivery in the
following manner on September 12, 2022:
3
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 4 of 533
Defendants.
STATE OF IOWA )
) SS:
COUNTY OF JOHNSON )
I, Cindy Seyfer, sworn upon oath, depose and state that I have personal knowledge of the
facts stated in this affidavit, and some of the information has been gathered from the records
of the University:
Doyle Appx. 4
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 5 of 533
2. Mark Warner was the Assistant Provost for Enrollment Management and Director
of Student Financial Aid from January 1988 through June 2, 2017. Kathy Bialk
served in this position from September l, 2017 through October 19, 2019.
Mends, Brandon Simon, Jonathan Parker, Marcel Joly, and Akrum Wadley.
4. Cooper's financial aid contracts with the University for 2011 through the spring of
5. Mends' financial aid contracts with the University for 2014 through the fall semester
6. Simon's financial aid contracts with the University of Iowa are attached as State 885-
92.
7. Parker's financial aid contracts with the University, which are attached as State 872-
84.
8. Joly's financial aid contract with the University of Iowa is attached as State 828-845.
9. Wadley's financial aid contracts with the University are attached as State 905-17.
10. To the best of my lmowledge and according to the records of the University of Iowa,
the University fully complied with the terms of the signed agreements and furnished
11. Football coaches such as Chris Doyle, Seth Wallace, or Brian Ferentz did not have
the authority to adjust, revoke, cancel, or modify the terms of the financial aid
12. Chris Doyle, Seth Wallace, or Brian Ferentz did not adjust, revoke, cancel or modify
the terms of the financial aid contracts with any of the six students identified above.
Doyle Appx. 5
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 6 of 533
Doyle Appx. 6
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 7 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 7
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 8 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 8
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 9 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 9
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 10 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 10
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 11 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 11
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 12 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 12
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 13 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 13
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 14 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 14
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 15 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 15
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 16 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 16
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 17 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 17
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 18 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 18
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 19 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 19
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 20 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 20
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 21 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
NLI Student Report
University of Iowa
NCAA ID Name Signing NLI Institution Sport Release Status Signing Year Uploaded NLI and
Date Status Aid
0911659910 COOPER, DARIAN 02/02/2011 VALID University of Iowa Football 2011-2012 No
RECORDS FOUND: 1
Doyle Appx. 21
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 22 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 22
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 23 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 23
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 24 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 24
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 25 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 25
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 26 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 26
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 27 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 27
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 28 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 28
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 29 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 29
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 30 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 30
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 31 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 31
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 32 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 32
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 33 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 33
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 34 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 34
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 35 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 35
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 36 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 36
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 37 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 37
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 38 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 38
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 39 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 39
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 40 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 40
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 41 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 41
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 42 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 42
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 43 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 43
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 44 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 44
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 45 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 45
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 46 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 46
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 47 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 47
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 48 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 48
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 49 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 49
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 50 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 50
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 51 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 51
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 52 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 52
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 53 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 53
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 54 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 54
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 55 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 55
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 56 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 56
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 57 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 57
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 58 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 58
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 59 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 59
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 60 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 60
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 61 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 61
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 62 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 62
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 63 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 63
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 64 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 64
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 65 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 65
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 66 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 66
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 67 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 67
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 68 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 68
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 69 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 69
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 70 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 70
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 71 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 71
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 72 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 72
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 73 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 73
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 74 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 74
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 75 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 75
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 76 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 76
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 77 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 77
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 78 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 78
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 79 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 79
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 80 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 80
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 81 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 81
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 82 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 82
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 83 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 83
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 84 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 84
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 85 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 85
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 86 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 86
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 87 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 87
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 88 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 88
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 89 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 89
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 90 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 90
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 91 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 91
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 92 of 533
CONFIDENTIAL
Doyle Appx. 92
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 93 of 533
Plaintiffs,
DECLARATION OF
vs. RAIMOND BRAITHWAITE
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA, BOARD OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT
REGENTS FOR THE STATE OF IOWA;
BRIAN FERENTZ; and CHRISTOPHER
DOYLE.
Defendants.
1. I am the Director of the Strength and Conditioning Staff of the University of Iowa
Football program.
2. I am 44 years old and reside in Iowa City, Iowa, with my wife, and we have four
children.
3. I first worked with the Iowa Football staff in 2002-2004 after being hired as an
assistant strength and conditioning coach by Chris Doyle. In 2005, I became Head Strength and
Conditioning Coach at Delaware State University and remained from 2005-2007. Delaware State
is a Historically Black University ("HBU"). I returned to Iowa in 2008 to work with Chris Doyle
as Assistant Director of the Strength and Conditioning Staff. I held that position until 2020, when
Doyle Appx. 93
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 94 of 533
4. I worked on the Iowa Football Program staff with Coach Chris Doyle initially for
about three years, left for three years, and worked with him again for about 13 years.
5. Coach Chris Doyle was my direct supervisor, and I would work with him every
workday while we were both members of the Iowa Football Program staff. I consider him a very
close friend, mentor, and the person who has had the greatest influence on my career.
6. When I first came to Iowa City, I lived with Coach Doyle and his family for a time
7. I have known Coach Brian Ferentz since 2002, when he played football for Iowa,
and I have worked with him on the Iowa Football Program staff for 11 years since he joined in
2012.
8. I have worked with Coach Seth Wallace on the Iowa Football staff for nine years.
Seth Wallace is currently the linebackers Coach and Assistant Defensive Coordinator.
9. I worked with Coaches Brian Ferentz and Seth Wallace during their years on the
Iowa Football Program staff, and I would see them usually each day during the football season and
10. In the twenty years I have known Chris Doyle, a person's race has never been an
issue with him. I have observed Chris Doyle working with many hundreds of student athletes and
have never heard him use a racial epithet, or any racially insensitive language. At no time has any
African-=Arnerican student athlete ever complained or commented to me that Chris Doyle acted
in any discriminatory manner. I would never accept any racist or discriminatory behavior on the
Doyle Appx. 94
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 95 of 533
11. I have not heard or read any racial slur, racial name, racial epithet, racial
discrimination or racial harassment from Chris Doyle, Seth Wallace, or Brian Ferentz during the
12. I am African-American.
13. I am familiar with all of the plaintiffs in this lawsuit. Both Chris Doyle and I worked
with these persons on a year around basis while they were at the University. I have never seen or
heard Chris Doyle engage in any of the negative racially charged behavior alleged. I am advised
that I am listed as either a witness to Chris Doyle treating Brandon Simon in a racially
discriminatory manner and harassing Brandon Simon or that Brandon Simon told me of such
treatment. I have never seen Chris Doyle treat Brandon Simon in a racially discriminatory or
harassing manner. I was never told of such treatment by Brandon Simon. I said nothing to
Brandon Simon in response to any such report because Brandon Simon did not make any such
report to me.
14. I am advised of an allegation that Coach Chris Doyle once called Michael Ojemudia
a monkey and that I allegedly overheard the statement. I heard no such statement from Coach
15. I am advised of an allegation by Marcel Joly that Coach Chris Doyle ridiculed or
said things about Marcel Joly's jewelry or fraternity bracelet in my presence. I did not hear or
observe Coach Chris Doyle speak to Marcel Joly about his jewelry or fraternity bracelet. Certain
types of jewelry were not permitted in the weight room for safety reasons and players were
instructed by the strength and conditioning staff, including Coach Doyle, to remove their jewelry
Doyle Appx. 95
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 96 of 533
16. Akrum Wadley, Jonathan Parker, Marcel Joly, Aaron Mends, Darian Cooper,
Brandon Simon, or Javon Foy never complained to or told me of any racial discrimination or
harassment towards them by any member or coach on the Iowa Football staff during the time they
17. Chris Doyle has, for decades, been a mentor and positive influence on student
18. In addition to his positive influence on young men in the football program, Chris
Doyle has been a mentor and strong supporter of other African-American strength and
conditioning coaches around the country and has been an instrumental influence on those coaches
19. I certify under penalty of perjury and under the laws of the United States that the
~~
RAIMOND BRAITHWAITE
Doyle Appx. 96
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 97 of 533
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
3. I grew up in south Chicago, attended a predominantly black high school and after
4. After college I served a brief internship with the NBA Chicago Bulls.
5. In 2007 I was hired by Chris Doyle, and I began working with Chris Doyle at the
6. Upon moving to Iowa City, I was welcomed into Chris Doyle’s family and
resided with his family until I was able to move into my own place.
Doyle Appx. 97
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 98 of 533
7. I have maintained contact with Chris Doyle since moving to Harvard and consider
daily basis for two years at the University of Iowa, I have never seen or heard him engage in any
behavior that could be considered remotely discriminatory towards African Americans or anyone
else.
9. I am African American.
10. I have observed Chris Doyle work with numerous student athletes and have never
seen or heard Chris Doyle use a racial epithet, use racially insensitive language, or engage in any
11. I have never seen or heard Chris Doyle treat people, including student athletes,
12. I would never tolerate discriminatory behavior on the part of persons I work with
and if I would have ever observed Chris Doyle crossing the line into inappropriate behavior or
knew of Chris Doyle doing so, I would have dealt with it in the strongest manner.
13. I certify under penalty of perjury and under the laws of the United States that the
1.
JAMES FRAZIER
Doyle Appx. 98
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 99 of 533
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
2. I am 59 years old and reside in Coralville, Iowa, with my wife, and we have two
children.
University before joining the Iowa Football Program staff in 1999. I have worked on the Iowa
4. I worked on the Iowa Football Program staff with Coach Chris Doyle for 21 years.
5. I have known Coach Brian Ferentz for 23 years and worked with him on the Iowa
Doyle Appx. 99
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 100 of 533
6. I have worked with Seth Wallace for 3 years previously while he was a GA and
again for the past 8 years on the Iowa Football Program staff. Seth Wallace is currently the
7. I worked closely with all three coaches during their years on the Iowa Football
Program staff and I would see them and be in football practices with them on a daily basis during
the football season and when the players trained and practiced.
8. I have not heard or read any racial slur, racial name, racial epithet, racial
discrimination or racial harassment from any of Chris Doyle, Seth Wallace, or Brian Ferentz
during the time I have served on the Iowa Football Program staff.
allegedly yelling and cursing at Akrum Wadley for parking his car near the football practice
facility . I observed no such incident and have not seen Brian Ferentz yell or curse at Akrum
allegedly asked Akrum Wadley if he were going to rob a liquor store or a gas station or words to
that effect. I observed no such incident and have not seen Brian Ferentz ask Akrum Wadley if he
were going to rob a liquor store or a gas station or words to that effect.
Simon in a racially discriminatory manner and harassing Brandon Simon or that Brandon Simon
told me of such treatment. I have not seen Chris Doyle treat Brandon Simon in a racially
discriminatory or harassing manner. I was not told of such treatment by Brandon Simon. I said
nothing to Brandon Simon in response to any such report because Brandon Simon did not make
12. I was at the football practice when Brian Ferentz kicked Jonathan Parker out of that
practice. I did not hear Brian Ferentz call Jonathan Parker a "Black dumbass."
13. I was at the football practice when Michael Ojemudia hit Matt Vandenberg hard. I
did not hear Brian Ferentz call Michael Ojemudia any racial name or racial slur. Brian Ferentz
spoke to me immediately after the hit about the type of hits by defensive players on offensive
14. Akrum Wadley, Jonathan Parker, Marcel Joly, Aaron Mends, Darian Cooper,
Brandon Simon, or Javon Foy have never complained to or told me of any racial discrimination or
harassment towards them by any member or coach on the Iowa Football Program staff during the
15 . I certify under penalty of perjury and under the laws of the United States that the
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
2. I first met Chris Doyle when I interned with his program while attending graduate
4. When I first moved to Iowa City I lived with Chris Doyle and his family until I
5. I worked with Chris Doyle on a daily basis from 2012 until 2016.
6. In 2016 I was hired as the Director of Strength and Conditioning at Delaware State
7. I am African American.
9. I have maintained vety regular contact with Chris Doyle since leaving the
University oflowa.
10. Chris Doyle has been and remains a father figure and mentor in my life. Chris Doyle
teaches young men, including myself, to be disciplined, accountable and professional in all aspects
of a person's life.
11. In the more than a decade I have known Chris Doyle; I have observed him working
with many hundreds of student athletes of different races and different backgrounds. I have never
heard him direct a racial epithet, racial slur, racially insensitive language, or anything else that
12. c I am familiar with all of the Plaintiffs in this matter except for JavonFoy and, along
with Chris Doyle, worked with them on a nearly daily basis and never heard or saw any of the
negative or racially charged behavior alleged. If anything of the sort had ever happened, it would
13. Because I worked with Chris Doyle and these student athletes, I take an accusation
of race discrimination against Chris Doyle also as an accusation against me. Nothing ever occurred
14. No African American student athlete, including Plaintiffs, has ever complained to
15. I am aware that PlaintiffDarian Cooper has alleged Chris Doyle used the "N" word
directed at Maurice Fleming. I personally witnessed a situation involving Maurice Fleming where
2
Doyle Appx. 104
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 105 of 533
Chris Doyle admonished Mr. Fleming for using that word and instructing Mr. Fleming very
16. I am also aware that Plaintiff Akrum Wadley has attributed some discriminato1y
motive to attempts to have him keep weight on by drinking extra sport shakes. Maintaining an
appropriate weight at the Division I level of football in the Big Ten Conference is a serious matter
of safety for all student athletes. In Mr. Wadley's case I was one of the persons addressing his
body weight issues and I was the person giving him the shakes to drink. There was nothing in any
way discriminatory in the way Mr. Wadley was treated when it came to weight and consuming
extra calories to maintain a safe weight. Everyone was treated the same with respect to this safety
17. I certify under penalty of pe1jury and under the laws of the United States that the
3
Doyle Appx. 105
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 106 of 533
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
1. I served as the Head Athletic Trainer of the University of Iowa Football program
2. Before joining the Iowa Football Program staff, I held positions on the athletic
training staffs ofNorthem Illinois University (2004-08), including Head Football Athletic Trainer,
and the University of Minnesota (2013-17), including Head Football Athletic Trainer. I also have
worked as an Athletic Trainer in Grand Rapids, Michigan, beginning in 2001, and as a contract
5. I worked with the Iowa Football Program staff and coaches frequently and also met
regularly with the team physician, Dr. Brian Wolf, and other members of the University of Iowa
6. I worked on the Iowa Football Program staff with Coach Chris Doyle usually on a
7. I have worked with Coach Brian Ferentz on the Iowa Football Program staff from
2018-22.
8. I have worked with Coach Seth Wallace on the Iowa Football staff from 2018-22.
9. I worked with Coaches Chris Doyle, Brian Ferentz, and Seth Wallace during their
years on the Iowa Football Program staff. I would see them frequently during the football season
10. I had almost daily contact with Coach Chris Doyle because the strength and
conditioning room where he mostly worked is very close to the athletic training room where I
worked. Players would come to the training room if they were injured or ill, and often came
11. I have not heard or read any racial slur, racial name, racial epithet, racial
discrimination, or racial harassment from any of Chris Doyle, Seth Wallace, or Brian Ferentz or
during the time I have served on the Iowa Football Program staff.
12. Akrum Wadley, Jonathan Parker, Marcel Joly, and Darian Cooper left the Iowa
13. Aaron Mends, Brandon Simon, and Javon Foy were part of the Iowa Football
Program during some of the time I have worked on the staff. None of these former players have
complained to or told me of any racial discrimination or harassment towards them by any member
or coach on the Iowa Football staff during the time they participated in the Iowa Football program.
14. In January 2020, I, other members of the Iowa Athletic Training staff, Dr. Kyle
Duchman, Dr. Brian Wolf, Dr. Andrew Peterson, Head Coach Kirk Ferentz and Head Strength and
Conditioning Coach Chris Doyle met to discuss injuries of players, including Javon Foy. Based
on the evaluations by the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, including the professional
advice and opinion of Dr. Kyle Duchman, the Iowa Athletic Training staff recommended that
Javon Foy not be permitted to play or practice in the Iowa Football Program because of his hip
condition and injuries and the limitations those injuries would place on his practicing and playing
football. Brian Ferentz and Seth Wallace had no involvement in that recommendation or meeting.
15. I certify under penalty of perjury and under the laws of the United States that the
Plaintiffs,
vs. DECLARATION OF
MARSHAL YANDA IN SUPPORT
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA, BOARD OF OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY
REGENTS FOR THE STATE OF IOWA; JUDGMENT
BRIAN FERENTZ; and CHRISTOPHER
DOYLE.
Defendants.
1. I am 37 years old.
2. I was in the University of Iowa Football program from January 2005 until March
2007.
5. During the time I played in the NFL, I returned to Iowa City during the off
7. Both while at the University of Iowa as a player and then for the many years after,
I worked alongside the Iowa student-athletes under the coaching of Chris Doyle.
case, I never once observed Chris Doyle uttering a racial epithet or racially inappropriate
statement nor have I ever witnessed Chris Doyle treat any student-athlete negatively because of
their race. Chris Doyle worked towards making every student-athlete he worked with to be
accountable not just in football but even more so in life as an adult. He mentors the young men
he works with to be successful in football and in life. Chris Doyle has been one of the most
10. Chris Doyle demanded your best effort every day and pushed people hard to be
successful, but he has never crossed the line of treating people negatively or improperly because
11. If I had ever seen or heard Chris Doyle acting in a discriminatory manner or using
racially inappropriate language at any point over the years, it would have been noticed and not
12. People often overlook that playing Division I football in the Big Ten Conference
is not easy. Playing in a developmental program like Iowa’s requires total effort every day and
doing everything, especially strength and conditioning work, correctly every day. Some athletes,
regardless of race, did not handle this environment well. But life after football can be even more
difficult, and those hard lessons taught by Chris Doyle were life lessons that translate to being a
productive member of your community, a successful career person, a better husband and father.
13. If in all the years I was coached by Chris Doyle, alongside hundreds of student-
athletes, discriminatory allegations such as those set out in this lawsuit had occurred, it would
have not only been seen by me and others but would have been a huge deal both inside and
14. I certify under penalty of perjury and under the laws of the United States that the
____________________________________
MARSHAL YANDA
Plaintiffs,
vs. DECLARATION OF
JAMIE WYNN IN SUPPORT
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA, BOARD OF OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY
REGENTS FOR THE STATE OF IOWA; JUDGMENT
BRIAN FERENTZ; and CHRISTOPHER
DOYLE.
Defendants.
Methodist University and will soon be transferring to a similar position at the University of Nevada
Las Vegas.
2. I was a collegiate athlete at the University of Missouri. I first met Chris Doyle in
3. My boss in my internship program in 2011 was not doing much to mentor me and
Chris Doyle took notice of that. Chris Doyle took me under his wing and began teaching and
mentoring me.
4. I am a black female who, because of Chris Doyle, works and succeeds in the white
5. Since 2011 Chris Doyle has been instrumental in my life and my career. He saw
the potential in me even before I saw it in myself. Chris Doyle had nothing at all to gain by helping
someone like me yet always helped to set me up for success and has been instrumental in my rise
towards the top of this profession. Chris Doyle continues to be a main influence in my life and my
career.
6. I have never heard Chris Doyle utter a racial epithet, use racially derogatory
language or treat persons differently because of their race. I could not have developed such a close
relationship with someone who treated people differently or negatively because of the color of
their skin.
7. Whether a student athlete, coworker or a student intern, Chris Doyle works to set
people up for success regardless of who they may be and regardless of the color of their skin.
8. I certify under penalty of perjury and under the laws of the United States that the
____________________________________
JAMIE WYNN
Plaintiffs,
vs. DECLARATION OF
RUSSELL HAYNES IN SUPPORT
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA, BOARD OF OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY
REGENTS FOR THE STATE OF IOWA; JUDGMENT
BRIAN FERENTZ; and CHRISTOPHER
DOYLE.
Defendants.
2. I graduated from the University of Iowa and began working on the athletic training
staff of the Iowa Football Program in 1987. I worked there for 38 years.
4. I worked with the Iowa Football Prograin staff and coaches frequently and also met
regularly with the teain physicians, Dr. Ned Amendola and Dr. Brian Wolf.
5. I worked on the Iowa Football Prograin staff with Coach Chris Doyle, usually on a
daily basis from 1999-2019.
6. I have known Coach Brian Ferentz from when he played football for Iowa, and I have
worked with him on the Iowa Football Program staff from 2012-18.
7. I have worked with Coach Seth Wallace on the Iowa Football staff from 2014-18.
8. I have continued to work with the Iowa Football Program as an Assistant Athletic
Trainer from 2018 - 2019, assisting the new head Athletic Trainer in transitioning into the
position. In 2020 I retired from full time employmen~ and I would have continued to work with
Coach Doyle up to 2020, as well as Brian Ferentz and Seth Wallace.
9. I worked with Coaches Chris Doyle, Brian Ferentz, and Seth Wallace during their
years on the Iowa Football Program staff and I would see them frequently during the football
season and when the players trained and practiced.
10. I had almost daily contact with Coach Chris Doyle because the weight room where he
mostly worked is very close to the athletic training room where I worked. Players would come
to the athletic training room if they were injured or ill.
11. I have never heard or read any racial slur, racial name, racial epithet, racial
discrimination or racial harassment from Chris Doyle, Seth Wallace, or Brian Ferentz or during
the time I have served on the Athletic Training staff covering the sport of football.
14. I certify under penalty of perjury and under the laws of the United States that the
preceding is true and correct.
Executedthis _~/_S
__ day of f\tJol)6'/ , 2022.
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
University of Iowa College of Law in May 2022 and just recently took the bar examination.
3. I was a student-athlete on the University of Iowa football team during the years
4. I came into the Iowa Football Program as a walk-on and eventually earned a
scholarship
5. Coach Chris Doyle was the person on the coaching staff I would have worked with
the most during my years in the football program and he changed my life in a positive way.
6. As a fullback in the football program, I also was with Coach Brian Ferentz a
significant period of time as he was the offensive line coach and then offensive coordinator who
7. Based upon my own knowledge and experience in the Iowa football program, I
have never observed or heard Chris Doyle or Brian Ferentz utter a racial epithet, use racially
insensitive language or treat a person more harshly or negatively because of their race.
8. I am African American.
9. In my experience Chris Doyle and Brian Ferentz treated all players similarly
10. Chris Doyle was a demanding coach who implemented accountability, discipline,
and hard work into the strength and conditioning program. However, those things that Chris Doyle
instilled in me have changed my life and made me a better student, a better person, and a better
husband, and have equipped me well for the challenges of life after football including my new
career as a lawyer.
11. In my experience, Chris Doyle coached people hard but it always came from the
place of wanting each player to be their best. Chris Doyle took interest in me and other student
athletes of all backgrounds and races as individuals not just a football player.
12. The type of football program Iowa had in general and more specifically in Chris
Doyle’s strength and conditioning program when I played was very demanding. It was not for
everyone but those who followed the program and bought into it were rewarded with life lessons
on being successful not only as a football player but also in life after football. Chris Doyle’s
strength and conditioning program and the life lessons from it were implemented the same with
I certify under penalty of perjury and under the laws of the United States that the preceding is true
and correct.
____________________________________
AUSTIN KELLY
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
1. I am 23 years old and grew up in Iowa attending Mount Vernon High School.
2. I attended the University of Iowa from 2017 to 2019 and played on the University
3. In 2019 I was drafted in the first round of the NFL draft by the Tampa Bay
4. During my time with the University of Iowa Football Team I had the most contact
with and worked most closely with Coach Chris Doyle and his strength and conditioning program.
5. During my time with the University of Iowa Football Program, several of the
6. During the time I was involved in the University of Iowa Football Program, I never
heard Coach Doyle utter a racial epithet, use racially derogatory or racially insensitive language
or treat any player differently or more harshly because of their race. Based upon my personal
observations and experience, Coach Doyle treated all athletes similarly regardless of their race.
8. Coach Doyle held all athletes accountable and required your best effort every day.
The lessons Coach Doyle taught us relating to hard work, discipline and accountability were
9. More importantly, the coaching by Coach Doyle were really life lessons. Those
lessons of hard work, discipline and accountability translate to life outside of football. Those
lessons teach you to be a better person, a better member of your community and to deal with the
adversity everyone deals with in their lives. These lessons are important for people of all races and
student-athletes.
10. In my experience, Coach Doyle wants all of the student-athletes he works with,
regardless of race or background, to not only be the best version of yourself physically but to get
you to a point where you will be a great man, a great husband and father.
11. I could not have developed such a close relationship with Coach Doyle if I had ever
witnessed or suspected he could engage in behavior such as has been alleged. I would not tolerate
such behavior and if it had occurred it would have been dealt with immediately and strongly.
Again, I have never witnessed Coach Doyle engaging in any discriminatory behavior against
anyone.
12. I certify under penalty of perjury and under the laws of the United States that the
____________________________________
TRISTAN WIRFS
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
1. I am 54 years old married, and my wife Tia and I have three sons. I currently reside
in Estero, Florida.
Human Movement. I received my master’s degree from Boston University in 1991, also in Human
Movement.
3. I have been involved in coaching student athletes since 1990. At the beginning of
my coaching career, I coached both football as well as strength and conditioning. Over the years I
have been a strength and conditioning coach for multiple men’s and women’s sport programs
4. From 1999 to June of 2020, I was the Head Strength and Conditioning Coach and
the Executive Director of Football for the University of Iowa football program. My duties as Head
Strength and Conditioning Coach and the Executive Director of Football included:
6. In 2012 I received the certification of Master Strength and Conditioning Coach, the
highest honor that can be achieved in the strength and conditioning profession.
Coaches Association Board of Directors and was reelected for an additional three-year term in
8. I have mentored more than eighty former interns and assistants, of many different
backgrounds and races, who have advanced in the strength and conditioning field, including forty
who have become head strength and conditioning coaches. Among the group of head strength
coaches are four African American professionals who now lead Division I programs.
9. In my career I have coached more than 2000 student athletes of many different
backgrounds and races. I would estimate I have coached more than 700 African American players
10. Until the morning of June 5, 2020, there had never been a complaint made against
me that was in any way related to racial discrimination, racial slurs, or treating anyone differently
because of their race. In each of the 21 years employed at University of Iowa, I received
extraordinary performance evaluations in my human resources file and never received a negative
11. In my career I have not used racial slurs, racial epithets or racially derogatory or
insensitive language.
12. I have never had the capacity or ability to make, enforce or interfere with any
educational contract any Plaintiff may have had with the University of Iowa.
13. Decisions related to playing time, discipline and team rules were made by the Head
Coach and/or position coaches, not by the strength and conditioning staff.
14. Some Plaintiffs in this lawsuit have complained about attaining target playing
weights assigned to them. A player’s optimal playing weight involves careful consideration and
analysis of 18 criteria. The areas of body composition, body frame, functional movement
screening, performance indicators, and injury history are carefully considered. Twenty-five years
of data collection and study have contributed to this process. The target weight is regularly adjusted
depending on many factors. Our goal was to maintain our players within a 5-pound window of
optimum bodyweight. This allowed the flexibility for normal everyday fluctuation. A primary
consideration of an optimal playing weight is safety of the athlete. In order to compete safely at
this level of football an athlete must be at a sufficient weight as well as having optimal strength
and conditioning in order to safely participate in Division I football. The tracking of bodyweight
is critical to ensure the athlete is participating safely. When athletes are out of range, we can adjust
training and nutrition to meet the needs of the athlete. The Sports Medicine staff is consulted, when
necessary, i.e., post illness or post-surgery in order to plan a safe progression to optimal
15. Some athletes, regardless of race, struggled with attaining their optimal target
weight. No players’ health or wellbeing was ever jeopardized while working with them in attaining
an optimal playing weight. Athletes who had difficulty either gaining or losing weight were
monitored more closely but, again, that was the same for everyone.
16. I am aware that in this lawsuit some players have made allegations relating to
jewelry or other items in the weight room. From a safety standpoint chains or other jewelry that
could get caught in equipment is a very big concern. All rules regarding jewelry and clothing in
17. All team rules regarding attire, jewelry, social media use and the like were
established by the Head Coach. Assistant coaches like myself worked to enforce those rules. All
18. Three things I try to instill in every student athlete is discipline, hard work and
accountability. I treat every athlete as I would my own son. If a student athlete, regardless of race,
is not on time for a training session or was not wearing the appropriate training attire they are
asked to leave that session and can then join back in the next session. If a student athlete, regardless
of race, is not following instructions, misusing equipment, or consistently doing things incorrectly
they may also be asked to leave that particular session. Over the years there have been many more
white players who have been asked to leave a session because of tardiness than African American
players. The reason for that is simply a numbers situation in that there are often more white players
than African Americans. Everyone is treated the same in this regard. Over the years, some of the
very best players in the history of the program were held to the same standard and received the
same consequences. This is a safety issue. We are training 120 athletes every day. We have a
specific coach-to-player ratio that is essential to ensure player safety. When a player is late, he
must be isolated, requiring one-on-one coaching to “catch up” to the group. This compromises the
AKRUM WADLEY
19. Akrum Wadley participated in the Iowa football program from 2015 to 2017. I have
never done anything or taken any action that in any way interfered with or adversely affected any
20. I have never commented negatively about Mr. Wadley to any person involved with
an NFL team or other professional league and Mr. Wadley acknowledged under oath he had no
knowledge of me doing so. Doyle Appx. 314 (Wadley Depo. 7:5-19). I have always made it a point
to note the positive things about a student athlete when speaking with people about an athlete’s
professional opportunities.
21. Similarly, the focus of Mr. Wadley’s issues he raised in his deposition about me
were related to his displeasure with our weight gaining protocol for him. He was not treated any
differently than any other person in his situation. Mr. Wadley’s bodyweight protocol included
more frequent weigh-ins and two shakes per day at the refueling station. Again, this was a safety
concern. Our objective was to ensure Mr. Wadley was getting the proper nutrition to safely
participate. Mr. Wadley was treated exactly the same as any other athlete in a similar situation
would be. Doyle Appx. 334-336; 339-340; 345 (Wadley Depo. 89:21-96:23; 107:8-112:10;
131:13-132:5).
22. Mr. Wadley acknowledges under oath that I never used the “n” word, and that I
never said anything about his hair, jewelry, tattoos other than Wadley’s belief that neither I nor
Coach Kirk Ferentz liked players wearing hoodies. Doyle Appx. 358; 368 (Wadley Depo. 182:15-
184:19; 224:8-10).
23. I have never told Mr. Wadley or any other student athletes “this is not the ghetto”,
or “the streets” or anything of the sort. I have told players things to the affect of “this isn’t Ankeny
High School anymore” or whatever high school the athlete may have been from. This type of
comment was occasionally made to student athletes regardless of background. Further, any such
comment Mr. Wadley attributes to me is alleged to have occurred when he first got to the
24. In the Second Amended Complaint recently filed in this matter Mr. Wadley makes
no specific allegations against me related to race. (SAC ¶¶ 117-135). The only concerns that relate
to the strength and conditioning program are two non-specific allegations related to his weight.
(SAC ¶¶ 125-126).
25. I have never done anything with respect to Mr. Wadley that was discriminatory in
any way.
JONATHAN PARKER
26. Jonathan Parker was a student athlete in the Iowa football program during the years
2013 to 2016. Mr. Parker received his bachelor’s degree in December of 2016 and transferred, as
27. I have never done anything or taken any action that in any way interfered with or
28. Mr. Parker testified under oath that I never mocked or ridiculed his hair, tattoos or
clothing. The only thing Mr. Parker alleged I said to him was that earrings were a girlie thing to
wear, which, in addition to not being true, has nothing to do with race. Mr. Parker also testified,
under oath, in his deposition that he never heard me use the “N” word or make any comments
racial in nature directly to him. Doyle Appx. 286-287; 294 (Parker Depo. 123:21-129:19; 156:11-
19).
29. Mr. Parker does make some claims in his deposition that he was treated differently
than white players with respect to gaining weight. In addition to not being true, Mr. Parker states,
under oath, that discussions regarding weight would have occurred between the years 2013 and
30. In the Second Amended Complaint recently filed in this matter Mr. Parker also does
not make any specific allegations against me related to race. (SAC ¶¶ 136-145).
31. I have never done anything with respect to Mr. Parker that was discriminatory in
any way.
MARCEL JOLY
32. Marcel Joly was a member of the Iowa football team from 2014 until his graduation
in December of 2017.
33. I have never done anything or taken any action that in any way interfered with or
34. Marcel Joly also does not make any specific allegations against me in the recently
35. Under oath Mr. Joly also stated he is not aware of me stating negative things about
him to anyone. Doyle Appx. 376; 378 (Joly Depo. 7:6-23, 14:10-17).
36. In his deposition Mr. Joly complains, as evidence of discrimination, that the
coaching staff wanted him to be a team player and that he and other African American athletes did
not want to be team players. Doyle Appx. 384-385 (Joly Depo. 41:20-42:18).
37. Mr. Joly admits, under oath, that I never made any comments to him about, tattoos,
jewelry, the way he spoke, or any other comment. Doyle Appx. 390 (Joly Depo. 62:17-63:24).
38. Mr. Joly also acknowledges no one ever threated to terminate his scholarship.
39. I have never done anything with respect to Mr. Joly that was discriminatory in any
way.
AARON MENDS
40. Aaron Mends was a member of the Iowa football team from 2014 to 2018. He
graduated from the University of Iowa in December of 2018 and, after his transfer as a graduate
student to Illinois State University he graduated from that institution with a master’s degree in
2020.
41. I have never done anything or taken any action that in any way interfered with or
42. Mr. Mends also does not make any specific allegations against me in the Second
43. I have never done anything with respect to Mr. Mends that was discriminatory in
any way.
44. In fact, after leaving the Iowa program Mr. Mends sent me a text message thanking
me for all that I did for him while he was in my program. Doyle Appx. 145 (Mends Depo. 42:1-
45. Mr. Mends also acknowledges in his deposition that no racial slurs, racial epithets,
or name calling was directed at him. Doyle Appx. 203 (Mends Depo. 276:17-277:11).
DARIAN COOPER
46. Darian Cooper was involved with the Iowa football program until January of 2016.
47. I have never done anything or taken any action with respect to Mr. Cooper that in
any way interfered with or adversely affected any scholarship or educational opportunity.
48. I have never done anything with respect to Mr. Cooper that was discriminatory in
any way.
49. I had no contact with any professional football team regarding Mr. Cooper and have
never stated anything to anyone about Mr. Cooper that was in any way negative.
50. I had no control over Mr. Cooper’s playing time or him being medically cleared to
play.
51. I have never assaulted, grabbed, or otherwise become physical with Mr. Cooper or
52. Mr. Cooper alleges in the Second Amended Complaint that I physically assaulted
him in front of witnesses. In his deposition however Mr. Cooper testified that this “assault”
consisted of one occasion of me grabbing his stomach when no one else was around to witness the
incident and stating that I was the person who determined his playing weight. Doyle Appx. 231-
233 (Cooper Depo. 56:21-64:17). I never grabbed Mr. Cooper’s stomach or that of any other player
in my entire career.
BRANDON SIMON
53. Brandon Simon was a member of the football program from 2015 until his transfer
55. Mr. Simon acknowledged under oath that I never used the “N” word, a racial
epithet, a racial name, or racial slur directed at him. Doyle Appx. 421 (Simon Depo. 86:4-6)
56. In Mr. Simon’s deposition his only allegation he made that he considered racial was
an alleged comment that I would send him back to the streets. Doyle Appx. 420-421 (Simon Depo.
85:2-86:24). Again, I have never used those words and the only thing I could have said would have
been along the lines of this program isn’t high school anymore.
57. I had no control or input with respect to Mr. Simon’s playing time or whether or
58. I have never done anything or taken any action with respect to Mr. Simon that in
any way interfered with or adversely affected any scholarship or education opportunity.
59. I have never done anything with respect to Mr. Simon that was discriminatory in
any way.
JAVON FOY
60. Javon Foy was a walk on participant in the Iowa football program for a very brief
period in 2019. Mr. Foy did not have a scholarship or any other agreement with the University or
the football team that I am aware of. Mr. Foy acknowledged in his deposition that he had no
scholarship and did not recall the terms of any agreement with the University. Doyle Appx. 429
61. I do not believe I had much, if any, direct contact with Mr. Foy during the brief
period he was actively involved with the program. Mr. Foy was a first-year athlete in the first 3
weeks of participation in the program. As a developmental athlete, I would not have had any direct
62. I have never done anything to Mr. Foy that was discriminatory in any way.
10
63. Mr. Foy Acknowledged in his deposition, under oath, that he did not recall me ever
using the “N” word or any other racial slur or epithet. Doyle Appx. 438 (Foy Depo. 52:11-53:4).
64. In the Second Amended Complaint the only specific allegation Mr. Foy makes
against me is that I once said his hair was a mess. (SAC ¶ 228). I never made such a comment to
Mr. Foy and, in fact, have no recollection of any contact with Mr. Foy during the short period of
65. Mr. Foy, under oath, did not recall me ever making any comment to anyone about
going back to the ghetto, being affiliated with a gang or any other similar comment. Doyle Appx.
66. I certify under penalty of perjury and under the laws of the United States that the
Christopher Doyle
CHRISTOPHER DOYLE
11
·3· ·- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
· · ·AKRUM WADLEY; JONATHAN PARKER;:
·4· ·MARCEL JOLY; AARON MENDS;· · ·:
· · ·DARIAN COOPER; BRANDON SIMON; :
·5· ·and JAVON FOY,· · · · · · · · :
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·:
·6· · · · · ·Plaintiffs,· · · · · ·:
· · ·vs.· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·: Case No. 4:20-cv-366
·7· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·:
· · ·UNIVERSITY OF IOWA, BOARD OF :
·8· ·REGENTS FOR THE STATE OF IOWA;:
· · ·BRIAN FERENTZ; and CHRISTOPHER:
·9· ·DOYLE,· · · · · · · · · · · · :
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·:
10· · · · · ·Defendants.· · · · · ·:
· · ·- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
11
12
13
14
19· ·2022.
20
21
22
23
24
Page 3 Page 5
·1· · · · · · A P P E A R A N C E S (continued) ·1· · · · · · · · · P R O C E E D I N G S
·2· ·Also present (via Zoom):
·2· · · · · · ·THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· Today's date is
· · · · · AKRUM WADLEY, Plaintiff
·3· · · · JONATHAN PARKER, Plaintiff
·3· ·March 22nd, 2022, and the approximate time is 9:04
· · · · · MARCEL JOLY, Plaintiff ·4· ·Central Time.· This begins the video deposition of
·4· · · · DARIAN COOPER, Plaintiff ·5· ·Aaron Mends requested by the defense in the matter
· · · · · KEVONTE MARTIN-MANLEY ·6· ·of Akrum Wadley, et al., plaintiffs, versus
·5· · · · LaRON TAYLOR
·7· ·University of Iowa, et al., defendants, in the
· · · · · KIRK FERENTZ, University representative
·6· · · · CHRISTOPHER DOYLE, Defendant
·8· ·United States District Court for the Southern
· · · · · AUDRA DRISH, Attorney General's Office ·9· ·District of Iowa, Central Division, Case
·7· · · · PALOMA MATE-KODJO, BMK Law Firm 10· ·No. 420-cv-366.· This deposition is being held via
·8 11· ·Zoom videoconference in remote locations.
·9
12· · · · · · ·My name is Amy Cooper, certified legal
10
11
13· ·videographer of Fidelity Video Services,
12 14· ·Incorporated, West Des Moines, Iowa.
13 15· · · · · · ·Counsel will please identify themselves
14 16· ·for the record.
15
17· · · · · · ·MR. STONE:· Roger Stone.· I represent
16
17
18· ·Brian Ferentz, and I'm associated with the
18 19· ·University of Iowa and Board of Regents.
19 20· · · · · · ·MS. MATE-KODJO:· Beatriz Mate-Kodjo for
20 21· ·the plaintiffs.
21
22· · · · · · ·THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· The oath will now be
22
23
23· ·administered by Jessi Lass, certified shorthand
24 24· ·reporter of Susan Frye Court Reporting, Des Moines,
25 25· ·Iowa.
Page 327
·1· · · · · · · · · C E R T I F I C A T E
·2· · · · I, the undersigned, a Certified Shorthand
·3· ·Reporter of the State of Iowa, do hereby certify
·4· ·that there came before me via videoconference at the
·5· ·time and date hereinbefore indicated, the witness
·6· ·named on the caption sheet hereof, who was by me
·7· ·duly sworn to testify to the truth of said witness's
·8· ·knowledge, that the witness was thereupon examined
·9· ·under oath, the examination taken down by me in
10· ·shorthand and later reduced to a transcript through
11· ·the use of a computer-aided transcript device under
12· ·my supervision and direction, and that the
13· ·deposition is a true record of the testimony given
14· ·and of all objections interposed.
15· · · · I further certify that I am neither attorney or
16· ·counsel for, nor related to or employed by any of
17· ·the parties to the action in which this deposition
18· ·is taken, and further that I am not a relative or
19· ·employee of any attorney or counsel employed by the
20· ·parties hereto or financially interested in the
21· ·action.
22· · · · Dated this 2nd day of April 2022.
23
· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·____________________________
24· · · · · · · · · · · · ·CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTER
25
·3· ·- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
· · ·AKRUM WADLEY; JONATHAN PARKER;:
·4· ·MARCEL JOLY; AARON MENDS;· · ·:
· · ·DARIAN COOPER; BRANDON SIMON; :
·5· ·and JAVON FOY,· · · · · · · · :
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·:
·6· · · · · ·Plaintiffs,· · · · · ·:
· · ·vs.· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·: Case No. 4:20-cv-366
·7· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·:
· · ·UNIVERSITY OF IOWA, BOARD OF :
·8· ·REGENTS FOR THE STATE OF IOWA;:
· · ·BRIAN FERENTZ; and CHRISTOPHER:
·9· ·DOYLE,· · · · · · · · · · · · :
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·:
10· · · · · ·Defendants.· · · · · ·:
· · ·- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
11
12
13
14
19· ·2022.
20
21
22
23
24
Page 3 Page 5
·1· · · · · · A P P E A R A N C E S (continued) ·1· · · · · · · · ·P R O C E E D I N G S
·2· ·Also present (via Zoom):
·2· · · · · · ·THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· Today's date is
· · · · · AKRUM WADLEY, Plaintiff
·3· ·March 23rd, 2022, and the approximate time is
·3· · · · JONATHAN PARKER, Plaintiff
· · · · · MARCEL JOLY, Plaintiff ·4· ·9:04 a.m., Central Time.· This begins the video
·4· · · · SAM BRINCKS, University representative ·5· ·deposition of Darian Cooper requested by the defense
· · · · · KIRK FERENTZ, University representative ·6· ·in the matter of Akrum Wadley, et al., plaintiffs,
·5· · · · CHRISTOPHER DOYLE, Defendant ·7· ·versus University of Iowa, et al., defendants, in
· · · · · AUDRA DRISH, Attorney General's Office
·8· ·the United States District Court for the Southern
·6· · · · EMMA WEINBERG, Solomon Simmons Law
·9· ·District of Iowa, Central Division, Case
·7
·8
10· ·No. 420-cv-366.· This deposition is being held via
·9 11· ·Zoom videoconference in remote locations.
10 12· · · · · · ·My name is Amy Cooper, certified legal
11 13· ·videographer of Fidelity Video Services,
12 14· ·Incorporated, West Des Moines, Iowa.
13
15· · · · · · ·Counsel will please identify themselves
14
15
16· ·for the record.
16 17· · · · · · ·MR. STONE:· Roger Stone for Brian Ferentz
17 18· ·and the University of Iowa.
18 19· · · · · · ·MR. DENNIE:· Christian Dennie.· I'll be
19 20· ·defending today on behalf of Darian Cooper.
20
21· · · · · · ·THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· The oath will now be
21
22· ·administered by Jessi Lass, certified shorthand
22
23 23· ·reporter of Susan Frye Court Reporting, Des Moines,
24 24· ·Iowa.
25 25
Page 147
·1· · · · · · · · · C E R T I F I C A T E
·2· · · · I, the undersigned, a Certified Shorthand
·3· ·Reporter of the State of Iowa, do hereby certify
·4· ·that there came before me via videoconference at the
·5· ·time and date hereinbefore indicated, the witness
·6· ·named on the caption sheet hereof, who was by me
·7· ·duly sworn to testify to the truth of said witness's
·8· ·knowledge, that the witness was thereupon examined
·9· ·under oath, the examination taken down by me in
10· ·shorthand and later reduced to a transcript through
11· ·the use of a computer-aided transcript device under
12· ·my supervision and direction, and that the
13· ·deposition is a true record of the testimony given
14· ·and of all objections interposed.
15· · · · I further certify that I am neither attorney or
16· ·counsel for, nor related to or employed by any of
17· ·the parties to the action in which this deposition
18· ·is taken, and further that I am not a relative or
19· ·employee of any attorney or counsel employed by the
20· ·parties hereto or financially interested in the
21· ·action.
22· · · · Dated this 2nd day of April 2022.
23
· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·____________________________
24· · · · · · · · · · · · ·CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTER
25
·3· ·- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
· · ·AKRUM WADLEY; JONATHAN PARKER;:
·4· ·MARCEL JOLY; AARON MENDS;· · ·:
· · ·DARIAN COOPER; BRANDON SIMON; :
·5· ·and JAVON FOY,· · · · · · · · :
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·:
·6· · · · · ·Plaintiffs,· · · · · ·:
· · ·vs.· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·: Case No. 4:20-cv-366
·7· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·:
· · ·UNIVERSITY OF IOWA, BOARD OF :
·8· ·REGENTS FOR THE STATE OF IOWA;:
· · ·BRIAN FERENTZ; and CHRISTOPHER:
·9· ·DOYLE,· · · · · · · · · · · · :
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·:
10· · · · · ·Defendants.· · · · · ·:
· · ·- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
11
12
13
14
19· ·2022.
20
21
22
23
24
Page 3 Page 5
·1· · · · · · A P P E A R A N C E S (continued) ·1· · · · · · · · · P R O C E E D I N G S
·2· ·Also present (via Zoom):
·2· · · · · · ·THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· Today's date is
· · · · · AKRUM WADLEY, Plaintiff
·3· · · · MARCEL JOLY, Plaintiff
·3· ·March 29th, 2022, and the approximate time is
· · · · · DARIAN COOPER, Plaintiff ·4· ·9:08 a.m., Central Time.· This begins the video
·4· · · · KIRK FERENTZ, University representative ·5· ·deposition of Jonathan Parker requested by the
· · · · · RAIMOND BRAITHWAITE, University representative ·6· ·defense in the matter of Akrum Wadley, et al.,
·5· · · · CHRISTOPHER DOYLE, Defendant
·7· ·plaintiffs, versus University of Iowa, et al.,
· · · · · AUDRA DRISH, Attorney General's Office
·6· · · · EMMA WEINBERG, Solomon Simmons Law
·8· ·defendants, in the United States District Court for
· · · · · KATIE NARVESON, Simmons Perrine ·9· ·the Southern District of Iowa, Central Division,
·7 10· ·Case No. 420-cv-366.· This deposition is being held
·8 11· ·via Zoom videoconference in remote locations.
·9
12· · · · · · ·My name is Amy Cooper, certified legal
10
11
13· ·videographer of Fidelity Video Services,
12 14· ·Incorporated, West Des Moines, Iowa.
13 15· · · · · · ·Counsel will please identify themselves
14 16· ·for the record.
15
17· · · · · · ·MR. STONE:· Roger Stone for Brian Ferentz,
16
17
18· ·and I'm associated with the University of Iowa.
18 19· · · · · · ·MR. DENNIE:· Christian Dennie.· I'll be
19 20· ·representing Jonathan Parker today.
20 21· · · · · · ·THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· The oath will now be
21
22· ·administered by Jessi Lass, certified shorthand
22
23
23· ·reporter of Susan Frye Court Reporting, Des Moines,
24 24· ·Iowa.
25 25
Page 223
·1· · · · · · · · · C E R T I F I C A T E
·2· · · · I, the undersigned, a Certified Shorthand
·3· ·Reporter of the State of Iowa, do hereby certify
·4· ·that there came before me via videoconference at the
·5· ·time and date hereinbefore indicated, the witness
·6· ·named on the caption sheet hereof, who was by me
·7· ·duly sworn to testify to the truth of said witness's
·8· ·knowledge, that the witness was thereupon examined
·9· ·under oath, the examination taken down by me in
10· ·shorthand and later reduced to a transcript through
11· ·the use of a computer-aided transcript device under
12· ·my supervision and direction, and that the
13· ·deposition is a true record of the testimony given
14· ·and of all objections interposed.
15· · · · I further certify that I am neither attorney or
16· ·counsel for, nor related to or employed by any of
17· ·the parties to the action in which this deposition
18· ·is taken, and further that I am not a relative or
19· ·employee of any attorney or counsel employed by the
20· ·parties hereto or financially interested in the
21· ·action.
22· · · · Dated this 12th day of April 2022.
23
· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·____________________________
24· · · · · · · · · · · · ·CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTER
25
·3
·4· ·- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
· · ·AKRUM WADLEY; JONATHAN· · · ·:
·5· ·PARKER; MARCEL JOLY; AARON· ·:
· · ·MENDS; DARIAN COOPER; BRANDON:
·6· ·SIMON; and JAVON FOY,· · · · :
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · :
·7· · · · · ·Plaintiffs,· · · · · :
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · :
·8· ·vs.· · · · · · · · · · · · · : Case No. 4:20-cv-00366
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · :
·9· ·UNIVERSITY OF IOWA, BOARD OF :
· · ·REGENTS FOR THE STATE OF· · ·:
10· ·IOWA; BRIAN FERENTZ; and· · ·:
· · ·CHRISTOPHER DOYLE,· · · · · ·:
11· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · :
· · · · · · ·Defendants.· · · · · :
12· ·- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
13
14
19· ·2022.
20
21
22
23
24
·2· · · · Q.· ·And then you -- it says here "I got back ·2· · · · I, the undersigned, a Certified Shorthand
·3· ·in my car and went to class not even focusing on my ·3· ·Reporter of the State of Iowa, do hereby certify
·4· ·that there came before me via Zoom videoconference
·4· ·exam anymore."· Is that how you felt after this
·5· ·at the time and date hereinbefore indicated, the
·5· ·incident?
·6· ·witness named on the caption sheet hereof, who was
·6· · · · A.· ·I just felt terrible.· I felt terrible.
·7· ·by me duly sworn to testify to the truth of said
·7· ·It just like mentally -- it mentally messed me up.
·8· ·witness's knowledge, that the witness was thereupon
·8· · · · Q.· ·Were you able to focus -- Strike that.
·9· ·examined under oath, the examination taken down by
·9· · · · · · ·Was this the only time where you received
10· ·me in shorthand and later reduced to a transcript
10· ·this type of verbal language towards you that caused
11· ·through the use of a computer-aided transcript
11· ·you to not be able to focus in class?
12· ·device under my supervision and direction, and that
12· · · · A.· ·No.· No, not that -- no.· I mean, it was 13· ·the deposition is a true record of the testimony
13· ·on a regular -- like I say, Brian Ferentz, he 14· ·given and of all objections interposed.
14· ·would -- you see him in the hallway, you see him in 15· · · · I further certify that I am neither attorney or
15· ·the meetings.· He would -- if he was walking past 16· ·counsel for, nor related to or employed by any of
16· ·you, he's going to figure out a way to make a racist 17· ·the parties to the action in which this deposition
17· ·joke or be sarcastic or find something -- nothing 18· ·is taken, and further that I am not a relative or
18· ·typically positive or nice comes out of his mouth or 19· ·employee of any attorney or counsel employed by the
19· ·anything that has something to do with contributing 20· ·parties hereto or financially interested in the
20· ·to like the team's success or any of that.· His 21· ·action.
21· ·purpose is to bring you down if you're a black 22· · · · Dated this 27th day of May, 2022.
22· ·player. 23
23· · · · · · ·MR. SOLOMON-SIMMONS:· No further 24· ·_________________________
24· ·questions. · · ·SONYA M. WRIGHT, RPR-CSR
·3
·4· ·- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
· · ·AKRUM WADLEY; JONATHAN· · · ·:
·5· ·PARKER; MARCEL JOLY; AARON· ·:
· · ·MENDS; DARIAN COOPER; BRANDON:
·6· ·SIMON; and JAVON FOY,· · · · :
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · :
·7· · · · · ·Plaintiffs,· · · · · :
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · :
·8· ·vs.· · · · · · · · · · · · · : Case No. 4:20-cv-00366
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · :
·9· ·UNIVERSITY OF IOWA, BOARD OF :
· · ·REGENTS FOR THE STATE OF· · ·:
10· ·IOWA; BRIAN FERENTZ; and· · ·:
· · ·CHRISTOPHER DOYLE,· · · · · ·:
11· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · :
· · · · · · ·Defendants.· · · · · :
12· ·- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
13
14
19· ·2022.
20
21
22
23
24
·3· · · · Q.· ·And when you say you're speaking for a lot ·3· ·Reporter of the State of Iowa, do hereby certify
·4· ·that there came before me via Zoom videoconference
·4· ·of other guys, are you talking about black -- your
·5· ·at the time and date hereinbefore indicated, the
·5· ·black teammates?
·6· ·witness named on the caption sheet hereof, who was
·6· · · · A.· ·A lot of my black teammates.· I'm speaking
·7· ·by me duly sworn to testify to the truth of said
·7· ·about them.· We feel like we have something to prove
·8· ·witness's knowledge, that the witness was thereupon
·8· ·to the world.· Everything that we're doing, we feel
·9· ·examined under oath, the examination taken down by
·9· ·like somebody's watching us.
10· ·me in shorthand and later reduced to a transcript
10· · · · · · ·Even with me going into work, I was afraid
11· ·through the use of a computer-aided transcript
11· ·to show my tattoos because I was afraid that my
12· ·device under my supervision and direction, and that
12· ·manager and my coworkers may look at me funny 13· ·the deposition is a true record of the testimony
13· ·because of my tattoos, but in reality, there's other 14· ·given and of all objections interposed.
14· ·guys, white guys in the building, in the facility, 15· · · · I further certify that I am neither attorney or
15· ·with a whole bunch of tattoos. 16· ·counsel for, nor related to or employed by any of
16· · · · · · ·But when I came home, that was another -- 17· ·the parties to the action in which this deposition
17· ·I was being sheltered from those things because I 18· ·is taken, and further that I am not a relative or
18· ·didn't want to be seen as a bad guy.· So when I came 19· ·employee of any attorney or counsel employed by the
19· ·home, I was lost.· I had nobody to talk to. I spent 20· ·parties hereto or financially interested in the
20· ·a lot of time by myself.· I did a lot of hiking. I 21· ·action.
21· ·did a lot of different things to keep me away from 22· · · · Dated this 28th day of May, 2022.
22· ·football.· I didn't want to be no part of football 23
23· ·at all because of what I experienced at the 24· ·_________________________
24· ·University of Iowa. · · ·SONYA M. WRIGHT, RPR-CSR
·3· ·- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
· · ·AKRUM WADLEY; JONATHAN PARKER;:
·4· ·MARCEL JOLY; AARON MENDS;· · ·:
· · ·DARIAN COOPER; BRANDON SIMON; :
·5· ·and JAVON FOY,· · · · · · · · :
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·:
·6· · · · · ·Plaintiffs,· · · · · ·:
· · ·vs.· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·: Case No.
·7· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·: 4:20-cv-00366
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·:
·8· ·UNIVERSITY OF IOWA, BOARD OF :
· · ·REGENTS FOR THE STATE OF IOWA;:
·9· ·BRIAN FERENTZ; and CHRISTOPHER:
· · ·DOYLE,· · · · · · · · · · · · :
10· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·:
· · · · · · ·Defendants.· · · · · ·:
11· ·- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12
13
14
15
20· ·2022.
21
22
23
24
·2· · · · Q.· ·Have you had any reason to go back to him ·2· · · · I, the undersigned, a Certified Shorthand
·3· ·after you completed your participation in the '20 to ·3· ·Reporter of the State of Iowa, do hereby certify
·4· ·that there came before me via videoconference at the
·4· ·'21 season?
·5· ·time and date hereinbefore indicated, the witness
·5· · · · A.· ·Yes, actually.· But I just, you know, kind
·6· ·named on the caption sheet hereof, who was by me
·6· ·of utilized his methods, you know, and stuff.
·7· ·duly sworn to testify to the truth of said witness's
·7· · · · Q.· ·Have you resumed your treatment with
·8· ·knowledge, that the witness was thereupon examined
·8· ·Dr. McMillan after the '20-'21 season?
·9· ·under oath, the examination taken down by me in
·9· · · · A.· ·No, sir.
10· ·shorthand and later reduced to a transcript through
10· · · · Q.· ·How many times did you visit with him,
11· ·the use of a computer-aided transcript device under
11· ·approximately, if you can recall, Mr. Simon?
12· ·my supervision and direction, and that the
12· · · · A.· ·How many total visits? 13· ·deposition is a true record of the testimony given
13· · · · Q.· ·Yes, if you can recall. 14· ·and of all objections interposed.
14· · · · A.· ·I don't recall.· If we do three days out 15· · · · I further certify that I am neither attorney or
15· ·the week times, you know -- or two days times, you 16· ·counsel for, nor related to or employed by any of
16· ·know, however many months or weeks of the year -- it 17· ·the parties to the action in which this deposition
17· ·was a good -- I don't recall. 18· ·is taken, and further that I am not a relative or
18· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· Thank you. 19· ·employee of any attorney or counsel employed by the
19· · · · · · ·MR. STONE:· Jessi, could you put our group 20· ·parties hereto or financially interested in the
20· ·into a break room again.· We'll take about a five- 21· ·action.
21· ·or ten-minute break, and then we'll be back and talk 22· · · · Dated this 30th day of June 2022.
22· ·about what we're going to do about finishing this up 23
23· ·and about lunch.· So thank you. · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·____________________________
24· · · · · · ·THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· Okay.· We will go off 24· · · · · · · · · · · · ·CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTER
·3· ·- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
· · ·AKRUM WADLEY; JONATHAN PARKER;:
·4· ·MARCEL JOLY; AARON MENDS;· · ·:
· · ·DARIAN COOPER; BRANDON SIMON; :
·5· ·and JAVON FOY,· · · · · · · · :
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·:
·6· · · · · ·Plaintiffs,· · · · · ·:
· · ·vs.· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·: Case No.
·7· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·: 4:20-cv-00366
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·:
·8· ·UNIVERSITY OF IOWA, BOARD OF :
· · ·REGENTS FOR THE STATE OF IOWA;:
·9· ·BRIAN FERENTZ; and CHRISTOPHER:
· · ·DOYLE,· · · · · · · · · · · · :
10· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·:
· · · · · · ·Defendants.· · · · · ·:
11· ·- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12
13
14
15
20· ·2022.
21
22
23
24
·2· ·to be on the team; correct?· You knew that? ·2· · · · I, the undersigned, a Certified Shorthand
·3· · · · A.· ·Correct.· But I was told about all the ·3· ·Reporter of the State of Iowa, do hereby certify
·4· ·that there came before me via videoconference at the
·4· ·other things I must meet, all the requirements, and
·5· ·time and date hereinbefore indicated, the witness
·5· ·that was not one of them.· It didn't seem like it
·6· ·named on the caption sheet hereof, who was by me
·6· ·was an issue that my health was -- or that my health
·7· ·duly sworn to testify to the truth of said witness's
·7· ·was an issue.· Excuse me.· It wasn't made apparent.
·8· ·knowledge, that the witness was thereupon examined
·8· · · · · · ·MR. STONE:· Why don't you give us five
·9· ·under oath, the examination taken down by me in
·9· ·minutes.· Jessi, if you'll put our group in the
10· ·shorthand and later reduced to a transcript through
10· ·room.· I think we may be completed.· So ...
11· ·the use of a computer-aided transcript device under
11· · · · · · ·THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· Okay.· We will go off
12· ·my supervision and direction, and that the
12· ·the record at 10:40.· We're off the record. 13· ·deposition is a true record of the testimony given
13· · · · · · ·(A brief recess was taken.) 14· ·and of all objections interposed.
14· · · · · · ·THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· We are going back on 15· · · · I further certify that I am neither attorney or
15· ·the record at 10:46.· We're on the record. 16· ·counsel for, nor related to or employed by any of
16· · · · · · ·MR. STONE:· We have no further questions. 17· ·the parties to the action in which this deposition
17· · · · · · ·MS. HECKENKEMPER:· I just have a couple of 18· ·is taken, and further that I am not a relative or
18· ·follow-ups. 19· ·employee of any attorney or counsel employed by the
19· · · · · · · · · · · ·EXAMINATION 20· ·parties hereto or financially interested in the
20· ·BY MS. HECKENKEMPER: 21· ·action.
21· · · · Q.· ·Javon, earlier -- and I believe it was in 22· · · · Dated this 4th day of July 2022.
22· ·the context of speaking about talking to Liz 23
23· ·Tovar -- you were asked whether there was anything · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·____________________________
24· ·other than the search of your dorm that bothered you 24· · · · · · · · · · · · ·CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTER
Page 67 Page 69
·1· ·no.· Did you feel that you were racially discrim -- ·1· ·AKRUM WADLEY, ET AL. VS. UNIVERSITY OF IOWA, ET AL.
·2· · · · · · · · · · · · JAVON FOY
·2· ·racially discriminated against in the University of
·3· · · · · · · · · · · · ·6/21/22
·3· ·Iowa's football program? ·4· · · · · · · · · ·WITNESS ERRATA SHEET
·4· · · · A.· ·Yes, I did. ·5· ·Indicate changes you want to make below, including
·5· · · · Q.· ·And did that bother you? · · ·page number, line number, the text as shown in the
·6· ·transcript, what you want to change it to, and the
·6· · · · A.· ·Very much so.
· · ·reason for the change.· Example:· Page X, Line Y,
·7· · · · Q.· ·How did that make you feel? ·7· ·Smith to Smythe, incorrect spelling.
·8· · · · A.· ·Emotionally I felt worthless, and I'm ·8· ·Page· ·Line· ·Change what to what· · · Reason
·9· ·still dealing with that to this day. · · ·____________________________________________________
·9
10· · · · · · ·MS. HECKENKEMPER:· I have no further
10
11· ·questions either.· And we'll read and sign.· Unless 11
12· ·there are any follow-ups ... 12
13· · · · · · ·MR. STONE:· We have nothing further. 13
14· · · · · · ·THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· This concludes the 14
15
15· ·video deposition of Javon Foy.· We are going off the 16
16· ·record at 10:47.· We're off the record. 17· ·I have read my examination under oath and have noted
17 · · ·any changes I wish to make to it above.· Signed and
18 18· ·dated this ____ day of _________, 2022.
19
19
· · ·_____________________
20 20· · ·WITNESS SIGNATURE
21 21
22 22· ·I witness the above signature on the ____ day of
23· ·_________, 2022.
23
24
24 · · ·_____________________
25 25· · · ·NOTARY PUBLIC· · ·My commission expires _______.
6/14/19, 8:21 PM
Msg...
Hey coach I just wanted to send you a text and reach out to you. Its been
on my mind for a while now, and I just wanted to say thank you for
everything that you and KF have done for me over the years. My last few
months at Iowa I feel like I barley crawled my way out of the program,
and I didn't want to leave you guys with a bad taste in your mouths about
me. I really appreciate you and KF sticking with me through my injury
and going out of the way to pay for my treatment while I was back home.
I'm sure you know this, but seeing it first hand you really do an amazing
job with the team. My coach's complement me all the time for my work
ethic and attention to details. I have you to thank for that. Its was hard
sometimes while I was in the program to realize how much I have
learned from being around you and KF but I am confident I have built a
solid foundation for what ever my next step is. If I only remember one
thing it will be to always fall back on my fundamental when things get
tough. I wish you all the best and hope the off season is going well. I'll be
cheering for you guys in the fall. #GoHawks
I don’t know KF’s number but feel free to pass this along to him as well.
6/14/19, 11:14 PM
Thanks Chris!
Not Responsive
Page 7 of 49
Doyle Appx. 443
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 444 of 533
Chris Doyle
coachdoyle@gmail.com
EXPERIENCE
University of Iowa January 1999- June 2020
Executive Director of Football
Head Strength & Conditioning Coach
• Directed all aspects of Athletic Performance and Player Development
• Designed annual calendar for football program
• Designed all programming (Speed Development/Strength Development/Conditioning)
• Directed Functional Movement Screening and Corrective Exercise Programming
• Director of Nutrition. Dietary analysis/individual consulting/all team meal planning and menus
• Coordinated athlete refueling and recovery
• Coordinated Sports Science analytics (GPS/Fatigue Science/Ithlete HRV/Force Plate Analysis)
• Coordinated team building and leadership development program.
• Conducted individual recruiting meetings
• NFL Liaison/Directed player agent education program
• Directed continuing education and internship programs
• Liaison to sports medicine. Designed and coordinated return to play protocols
• Served on the University of Iowa Health Advisory Board
University of Utah January 1998- December 1999
Director of Strength & Conditioning
• Directed Strength & Conditioning for all sports
• Worked directly with Football and Men’s Basketball
• Conducted individual recruiting meetings
• Liaison to sports medicine
• Served on the University of Utah Health Advisory Board
University of Wisconsin January 1996- January 1998
Assistant Strength & Conditioning Coach
• Assisted with Football, Men’s and Women’s Basketball and Volleyball
• Head S&C Coach Men’s Hockey
Holy Cross College- Assistant Football Coach January 1992- December 1996
• Offensive Line/TE Coach
• All aspects of Offensive Organization/Game Plan/Practice Plans
• Assisted with S&C program in off-season
University of Notre Dame - Graduate Assistant January 1991- December 1991
• Offensive Line
• Assisted with S&C program in off-season
Syracuse University- Graduate Assistant May 1990- December 1990
• Offensive Line
• Iowa won 47 games over the past five seasons, the highest total in school history
over any five-year period, and a total that ranks ninth nationally.
• Iowa participated in 17 bowl games since 2001, including 11 January bowl
games. Iowa has recorded January bowl wins over Florida (2004 Outback),
Louisiana State (2005 Capital One), South Carolina (2009 Outback), Georgia
Tech (2010 Orange) and Mississippi State (2019 Outback).
• Iowa posted a perfect 12-0 regular season record in 2015, winning the West
Division of the Big Ten Conference. Iowa participated in the 2016 Rose Bowl
Game and the 2015 Big Ten Championship and ended the season in the top 10
in the final national rankings for the 5th time under Doyle.
• Iowa has won 151 games over the past 18 seasons, including 90 Big Ten games.
• Doyle was elected to serve as a member of the CSCCa Board of Directors at the
organization’s 16th annual national conference in 2016, and in 2018 re-elected
for an additional three-year term by his peers.
• Doyle was presented with the certification of Master Strength and Conditioning
Coach by the CSCCa in 2012. The certification is considered the highest honor
that can be achieved in the coaching profession of Strength and Conditioning,
and represents professionalism, knowledge, experience, expertise and longevity
in the field.
• Doyle has mentored more than 80 former interns and assistants who have
advanced in the field of Strength and Conditioning, with 35 becoming head
strength and conditioning coaches.
• During Doyle’s tenure 89% of senior starters moved on to the NFL.
• Developed 210 student-athletes who have advanced to the professional ranks in
the NFL, NHL and NBA.
• 64 Iowa players have been drafted in the past 17 years, with nine first round
selections and 14 players being selected among the top 50 picks.
• Iowa had 3 walk-ons drafted in the same draft (2003). Only time in NFL history.
• Iowa had 2 TE’s drafted in the first round (2019). Only time in NFL history.
• Iowa has seen 6 underclassmen drafted in the past two drafts.
• Iowa players have dominated the NFL combine over the past 20 years. Routinely
finishing at the top positionally.
• Inducted into the Boston College High School Hall of Fame in 2004. Chris and
his wife, Tia, have three sons, Declan, Donovan and Dillon. Declan is an
offensive assistant coach with the NFL’s New Orleans Saints. Donovan
graduated from Harvard where he was a member of the wrestling team. Dillon is
a sophomore starting LB at Baylor University
HUSCH BLACKWELL
PERSONNEL REPORT
Date: July 2020
To: University of Iowa
From: Husch Blackwell LLP
Re: Excerpts from Personnel Report of Coach Chris Doyle
“It is important to note that many specific allegations and incidents were disputed
and/or were uncorroborated.”
“Several coaches described being “shocked and surprised” after reading the
allegations against Coach Doyle on Twitter. Numerous coaches said they never saw
any of the things being alleged and their players never approached them about Coach
Doyle’s treatment of them.”
“Several players disputed the allegation that Coach Doyle treated players differently
based on their race.”
“Several Black current and former players said they never saw Coach Doyle say or do
anything racially offensive. Two former Black players said Coach Doyle held everyone
to the same high standard and that if you did not meet that standard, he would let you
know. A current player said Coach Doyle pushed him hard, but nothing was based on
his race; it was all about making him better.”
“One current player said Coach Doyle was a mentor and father-figure to him and
described him as a very demanding coach for whom every player had to come in every
day attempting to be the best versions of themselves. Several current players said their
relationship with Coach Doyle was good because they followed the rules and did not
get into trouble. A different current player said that players “brought trouble on
themselves” because they didn't do things “the right way” and that should be taken
under consideration.”
“Coach Doyle denied each of the allegations. He stated that he treated every player
the way that he treats his own son. He denied mistreating any players or using racist,
sexist, or ableist language. He also denied bullying or trying to push anyone out of the
program. He characterized some of the allegations made by current and former players
as “theatrics” or having been “embellished” and told investigators that most of the
accusations lodged against him through social media were inaccurate and untrue.”
“Coach Doyle explained that his coaching style is based on several core principles as
an educator. One of those core principles is to make a positive impact on people’s
lives. He also believes in “self-fulfilling prophecy” and that his job is to help young
people believe in themselves by challenging them and then helping them overcome
those challenges to build confidence. According to Coach Doyle, college football is
difficult, and his one goal is to help athletes improve. Coach Doyle described himself
as dedicated, devoted, tough, and hard, but denies ever acting with racial bias.”
“According to one coach, Coach Doyle required players to take pride in what they did
and be very diligent and detail oriented; if things were not done the right way, they
needed to be addressed. A former coach said Coach Doyle expected players to be
Doyle Appx. 448
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 449 of 533
detailed and on time. A different former coach said Coach Doyle held players to an
extremely high standard but never demeaned or embarrassed a player.”
“Current and former strength and conditioning staff members, including four Black staff
members, noted that they had very positive experiences working with Coach Doyle.
These staff members denied that Coach Doyle targeted players based on their race.
Indeed, three Black former staff members told investigators that Coach Doyle’s
personal interest in their professional development and career aspirations contradict
such allegations.”
INDIVIDUAL STATEMENTS
EACH OF THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS WERE CONTRIBUTED
IN THE SUMMER AND FALL OF 2020
“I am aware of what has been going on at the University of Iowa from a distance, and I feel it is important to communicate my experience with
Chris Doyle and Iowa football during my 14 years there. My position at Iowa required my supervision of the health and well-being of all the
players, took care of all their injuries, communicated to their parents and families in all of these situations. I feel I have an extremely broad
view on the operations and culture within Iowa football.
First, we had a unique approach at Iowa that is non-existent at most NCAA schools and other sports organizations. We had a collaborative
team approach to the health and management of injuries within football with transparent seamless communication. We had weekly team
meetings with team physicians (primary and orthopedic (me)), trainers, conditioning coach (Chris Doyle), head coach and discussed each
injury with a daily and weekly plan. Input, questions, concerns, came from the whole team. Communication to the athlete and family regarding
medical matters was by me or the trainers. This was an ideal situation in terms of caring for injuries pre-surgery, post-surgery, rehab,
strengthening, and progression to return to sport. Chris Doyle was involved in all stages of care from planning, communication with the
athletes, rehab, and functional progression according to medical oversight. It was ideal teamwork, and successful care and return to the field for
all athletes. As a team physician I was never pressured to return athletes to the field prematurely.
I can state with certainty that we took care of all athletes in the same fashion, no matter if they were starters, freshmen, walk-ons….I did not
sense any element of racial bias in the Iowa atmosphere…no bias in the care of all of these athletes. I do not remember any occasions where
athletes or family members were concerned about racial bias, inappropriate care, inequality, or different level of care based on anything.
In my opinion Chris Doyle was the ultimate considerate team player in our “medical team”. He was always asking questions, all directed at
learning and improving the care of these kids’ lives and their health. In addition to taking care of injuries, we were involved in pre-season and
post season evaluation to improve and prepare the athletes off-season and upcoming season, as a means of reducing injury from future
participation. I am speaking mainly from a medical point of view, but I also know indirectly that Chris was involved in the complete care of
these athletes: mentoring, nutritional support, social initiatives in the community, to mention a few.
In summary, Chris Doyle is an outstanding communicator and coach, but more importantly I feel he is of the highest ethical and moral
standard, and with his work always wanted to do the right thing. He is passionate and energetic and would be a tremendous asset for any
company or organization.”
PAT ANGERER
INDIANAPOLIS COLTS
“No coach has done more for my career and my life than Chris Doyle. He is the main
reason I went to The University of Iowa and the reason I was able to have an NFL
career. As much time, effort and love he puts into making you a better player, he puts
just as much into making you the best person you can be. When parenting my three
children or working in my new career, there are daily instances where I look back at
things Coach Doyle has instilled in me which allows me to overcome obstacles with
ease. A teammate of mine at The University of Iowa, named Brett Greenwood, collapsed
in 2011 and was in a coma for nearly 30 days. Since then we have been working to try to
build him back up and get him moving again. Coach Doyle has dropped everything to
assist Brett in his recovery. Most recently, driving an hour to assist Brett in a workout.
Brett has a long road ahead, when Coach Doyle is here we get the best out of Brett.
When Coach Doyle is your coach, you get the absolute best out of yourself and when
Coach Doyle is your coach, you get the absolute best out of your team. Coach Doyle is
the best in the business and has been for many years but he is still humble, always
evolving and looking for any edge he can give his athletes not just during their careers
but for the rest of their lives.”
RAIMOND BRAITHWAITE
DIRECTOR OF STRENGTH & CONDITIONING, IOWA FOOTBALL
“I have witnessed firsthand; Chris Doyle be an agent of change in the lives on young
people over the last 16 years. He coaches people to what they could be, not to what they
are now. He exposes individuals to a higher standard and then holds them to that
standard moving forward. At the same time he understands that even though the athletes
he works with come from different backgrounds, they all have the same potential for
vast improvement mentally as well as physically, and they must leave their comfort
zones to get there. His unique ability to take complex concepts and make them simple
enough for athletes to understand is second to none. He educates athletes to realize that
champions are created and formed by decisions made when no one is watching. He has
motivated the people he works with to become better versions of themselves. He is a
leader. A man of integrity, humility and ambition that understands that teams can go far,
only if they go together. On a personal level, Chris Doyle set an example for me as a
husband and as a father. Being around him has made me a better person which has also
made me a better coach. He is someone I would want in my life even if the sport of
football did not bring us together.”
BRYAN BULAGA
GREEN BAY PACKERS, LOS ANGELES RAMS
NFL CAPTAIN
“I can’t say enough about how impactful Coach Doyle was for me not only as a football
player but as a person. We as players spent more time with Coach Doyle than any other
coach at Iowa and he made every guy raise their level of focus, intensity, and effort
every single workout. I can honestly say that without Coach Doyle’s workouts and
programming for three years, I would not have been ready to make the jump to the NFL
as a 21-year-old kid. He is the best in the business at what he does, and I am extremely
thankful for the three years I had with him. When I left I Iowa I left as a better football
player and a better man and I will be forever grateful for the role coach Doyle played in
that.”
DALLAS CLARK
INDIANAPOLIS COLTS, PRO BOWL, SUPER BOWL CHAMPION
SEAN CONSIDINE
BALTIMORE RAVENS, SUPER BOWL CHAMPION
“Coach Doyle was exactly who I needed at a point in my life where I wanted to become
the best, I could be but didn’t know how to do it on my own. His emphasis not only on
the physical nature of football training but also the science and mental state of mind
required to reach your potential instilled a foundation that I rely on to this day. I am
extremely fortunate for the 5 years I shared with Coach Doyle and I owe a lot of my
success to the leadership he provided!”
MIKE DANIELS
CINCINNATI BENGALS, PRO BOWL
“In a word, Coach Doyle was the ‘I’ in Mike Daniels. His hardcore weight room
workouts, and excellent life lessons have helped me to stay dominant in the most
competitive, popular and idolized sport on the planet. His teachings were and continue
to be implemented by me in the NFL. I look forward to passing these on to both of my
sons in the future as well. With great respect, and honor always; Thank you Coach
Doyle!”
A.J. EPENESA
BUFFALO BILLS
“We are a program built on taking two- and three-star players turning them into big time
B1G players. A lot of the credit is due to our strength and conditioning program. Coach
Doyle views every single moment, every single day, as an opportunity to get better.”
ETTORE EWEN
PROFESSIONAL WRESTLER, WWE WORLD CHAMPION
“There’s a bevy of collegiate All-Americans, NFL starters and All-Pro players who will
speak to the massive leaps in strength & performance they made under Chris Doyle’s
guidance. I, too, immediately knew Coach Doyle was a master of his craft as soon as I
got to Iowa. Although I never played a down of professional football, I still use many of
the principles I learned from Coach Doyle as a professional wrestler. However, what’s
not talked about enough is the connection Chris makes with student-athletes. Chris
regularly went out of his way to cheer me up or check in with me when I was struggling
with the mental toll of multiple ACL rehabs. Even when my playing days were over, he
made a point to make me feel like I was valued as a human, and for that I’ll be forever
grateful. “
NOAH FANT
DENVER BRONCOS
“During my time at Iowa I could always count on Coach Doyle to hold me to the
absolute highest standard. He demanded greatness out of anyone that came through the
Iowa program. He truly helped me reach my goals at an exponential pace. I wouldn’t
have been able to make those drastic transformations to my body and my mentality
without having Coach Doyle as my Strength Coach. I would challenge anyone to find
another Strength Coach that takes guys that are two and three star athletes out of high
school and turns them into first round draft picks as much as Coach Doyle has. He
provides the young men that come through his program the tools they need to make the
best of their careers in football, but also to make the best of their lives away from the
game.”
JAMES FRAZIER
DIRECTOR OF STRENGTH & CONDITIONING, HARVARD
(IOWA 2006-2008)
“Coach Doyle has been one of my largest advocates. Not just in the field of strength and
conditioning, but also in life. I have worked to emulate my coaching style after his.
During my time working with him, he has shown himself to care deeply for the athletes
under his care, and to demand the best of anyone working with him. He pushed each of
his athletes to focus on details and push themselves outside of their comfort zones. He
pushed me to be a better strength coach, father and teacher. His ability to get the most
out of players and staff are evident in the success his former players and assistants have
achieved after working with Coach Doyle. His impact and ability to love, serve and care
are second to none.”
ANTHONY HITCHENS
KANSAS CITY CHIEFS CAPTAIN, SUPER BOWL CHAMPION
“I appreciate everything Coach Doyle has done for me and my career, not only held me
accountable in sports but in life. Thank you for the traits you instilled in us. It will make
us better men, brothers, sons, fathers, and husbands. My experience with Doyle was
everything I needed to succeed in life.”
– Anthony Hitchens, Kansas City Chiefs. Captain and Super Bowl Champion.
CHAD GREENWAY
MINNESOTA VIKINGS, CAPTAIN, PRO BOWL
“Chris Doyle has been the biggest coaching influence in my life. I came to the
University of Iowa as an 18-year old boy, with big dreams and a work ethic. Coach
Doyle taught me how to be a leader, taught me to sacrifice, taught me how to care for
my brothers (teammates) like no one had done before. Coach Doyle taught all of us the
meaning of TEAM first culture and the power that it possesses. Beyond the weight room
and the lessons on the field Coach Doyle provided me the blueprint of what it took to be
a great man. The lessons I learned in the Iowa program serve me every day as a
husband, as a father, as a community leader and as a professional. Coach Doyle was the
biggest part of that. The thing I admire about OUR program at Iowa is that it isn’t one
size fits all. OUR program is for everybody who is selfless, team first and for anyone
who is willing to work for a common goal that is bigger than themselves. I thank Coach
Doyle everyday for these lessons and wouldn’t be the man I am without him.”
RUSSELL HAYNES
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA SPORTS MEDICINE CENTER
CLINICAL PRACTICE ATHLETIC TRAINER
“I have worked with Coach Chris Doyle for 20 years in my role as Assistant Athletic
Trainer and Associate Director of Athletic Training Services/Head Athletic Trainer of
Football at the University of Iowa. Chris has a deep commitment to the program and the
positive development of all members of the football team. His science-based approach to
strength and conditioning has provided highly effective programming throughout the
years that I have worked with him. Chris’s continuous evaluation of research and
evolving science has been an important part of the efficiency and effectiveness of the
strength and conditioning program. Chris provides an environment that encourages
personal and professional growth on and off the field, and he believes in a team
approach in all aspects of coaching. Chris effectively collaborates with the sports
medicine staff on the rehabilitation and reconditioning of injured athletes. He listens,
discusses, and provides alternative programing for a safe return to sports participation of
injured athletes. His interactions have been positive, productive, and respectful. I have
great respect of Chris’s standards, work ethic, and his constant pursuit of providing a
cutting-edge approach to player programming.”
T.J. HOCKENSON
DETROIT LIONS
“Throughout your playing career, you’re thrown into situations that are uncomfortable
and you have to be able to relax and navigate your way through those. Coach Doyle
always teaches you to be comfortable in those situations to be successful.”
MICAH HYDE
BUFFALO BILLS, CAPTAIN, PRO BOWL
“Coach Doyle is a huge reason why I’m where I am today. His knowledge in physical
training and transforming athletes is remarkable. I’m early into my 8th year in the NFL
and I feel better than I ever have due to the knowledge he’s passed on to me.”
JOSEY JEWELL
DENVER BRONCOS
“Coach Doyle demands excellence and will get every ounce of potential out of you if
you trust in the process. If you are willing to put in the work, he will give you all the
tools to succeed and that’s why he’s the best in the business.”
NATE KAEDING
SAN DIEGO CHARGERS, ALL PRO
“Often times kickers are set aside in the weight room and ignored. Throughout my entire
collegiate and professional career Coach Doyle went out of his way to customize a
strength development plan that was critical to my success. Beyond that, Coach Doyle
was a mentor who instilled in me a love of hard work, accountability and toughness.”
DESMOND KING
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS, ALL PRO
“Coach Doyle develops you into the best athlete you can be, physically and mentally.
That’s why he was so special to our program at Iowa.”
CHRIS KIRKSEY
GREEN BAY PACKERS, CAPTAIN
“Coach Doyle has helped me develop not only by exceeding on the field but also
preparing me mentally for the next level. I had high expectations for myself and he
helped push me to thrive in everything I did. That is what coaching is about, pushing
your players beyond what they think their limits are. Chris Doyle would be a great piece
to helping men reach their potential.”
CASEY KREITER
NEW YORK GIANTS, PRO BOWL
“The most effective coaches have two essential traits, an expertise of their sport and a
deep compassion for their athletes. Coach Doyle epitomizes both at the highest level.
Coach Doyle is someone that has been vital to my success as an athlete, but more
importantly as a human being. I would not be the man, father, or husband that I am
today without his influence. His expertise in the field of strength and conditioning
speaks for itself, but his ability to connect with individual athletes is what makes him an
elite coach. He is someone I can call for advice, and someone who has always found joy
in his athletes’ successes over his own. Coach Doyle has never been afraid to challenge
me or tell me when I can do better. In times of need Coach Doyle has also the first
person to take me aside and make sure I was alright. Sports are better with Coach Doyle
involved and any organization would be fortunate to have him involved in their
program.”
KAMMY POWELL
DIRECTOR OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, IOWA FOOTBALL
“As the Head Football Athletic Trainer at The University of Iowa, I worked with Chris
Doyle for 2 years. Chris is a true professional who looks to get the best from everyone
around him. We had a very positive working relationship. There was always a concern
for doing what was best for the student-athlete. We worked together to develop and
execute a plan to get players back on the field as quickly and safely as possible. Chris
not only cared for their physical well-being but also cared about developing the student-
athlete to be the best person they could be through accountability and holding them to a
high standard.”
RILEY REIFF
MINNESOTA VIKINGS, CAPTAIN
“There has not been a bigger impact on my football career than Coach Doyle. I can’t
thank him enough for what he’s done for me in the weight room, but I am more grateful
for him developing me into the man I am today. Coach Doyle is the definition of a
leader.”
BRANDON SCHERFF
WASHINGTON FOOTBALL TEAM CAPTAIN, ALL PRO
“If it were not for Coach Doyle, I would not be sitting in the position that I am today.
Coach Doyle challenged me to do things that I would never think I could do each day.
He not only helped me become a faster and stronger football player, he taught me how
to treat people the right way and be a better man. He turned me into the husband and
father that I am today. He is always looking out for my best interest and is always
willing to help whenever I need him. I owe a lot to Coach Doyle.”
DERRECK ROBINSON
CLEVELAND BROWNS
JOEL WELSH
DIRECTOR OF STRENGTH & CONDITIONING, CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY
(IOWA 2012-2017)
"We get into our profession to help make an impact on those we serve, to build lifelong
relationships, and hopefully leave a legacy on those we encounter. Coach Doyle has
done that for me as well as countless others. I not only regard Coach Doyle as a mentor
but as a friend and father figure. Coach Doyle gets the best out of everyone he coaches
and works with because he sees the best in them. He sees someone's potential before
they see it in themselves; that is the marking of a Great Coach. Coach Doyle's impact
goes beyond the X's and O's, he is not only in the forefront in training and performance,
but he also creates an environment for someone to maximize their true ability and
potential."
- Joel Welsh, Director of Strength & Conditioning, Central Michigan University. (Iowa 2012-2017)
TRISTAN WIRFS
TAMPA BAY BUCCANNEERS
“As much as Coach Doyle wants you to be the best version of yourself physically, he
wants to get you to the point where you will be a great man, you will be a great husband
and father.”
MARSHALL YANDA
BALTIMORE RAVENS CAPTAIN
8X PRO BOWL, SUPER BOWL CHAMPION
“Coach Doyle has forever changed the way I live and approach my life. Teaching me the
ways of accountability, responsibility, and mental toughness to the highest degree. I
continue to practice the habits that were instilled by him daily and will continue to do
so. He is a great coach and a great communicator. I always had a good work ethic but
after him showing me the way, I unlocked potential that I never knew I had. I came from
junior college, had no division 1 offers out of high school, and ended up playing 13
years in the NFL. Besides my parents he is the most influential person in my life.”
– Marshal Yanda, Baltimore Ravens Captain, 8x Pro Bowl, Super Bowl Champion.
The University of Iowa brings together in common pursuit of its educational goals persons of many nations, races, and
creeds. The University is guided by the precepts that in no aspect of its programs shall there be differences in the
treatment of persons because of race, creed, color, national origin, age, sex, disability, sexual orientation, gender
identity, or any other classification that deprives the person of consideration as an individual, and that equal
opportunity and access to facilities shall be available to all. Among the classifications that deprive the person of
consideration as an individual are those based on associational preference. These principles are expected to be
observed in the internal policies and practices of the University; specifically in the admission, housing, and education
of students; in policies governing programs of extracurricular life and activities; and in the employment of faculty and
staff personnel. The University shall work cooperatively with the community in furthering these principles.
Page last updated August 2009 by Office of the Senior Vice President for Finance and Operations
For related policies, see II-14 Anti-Harassment, II-4 Sexual Harassment, and II-11 Anti-Retaliation.
3.1 POLICY AND RATIONALE.
The University of Iowa brings together in common pursuit of its educational goals persons of many nations,
races, and creeds. The University is guided by the precepts that in no aspect of its programs shall there be
differences in the treatment of persons because of race, creed, color, religion, national origin, age, sex,
pregnancy, disability, genetic information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military, sexual
orientation, gender identity, associational preferences, or any other classification that deprives the person of
consideration as an individual, and that equal opportunity and access to facilities shall be available to all. These
principles are expected to be observed in the internal policies and practices of the University; specifically in the
admission, housing, and education of students; in policies governing programs of extracurricular life and
activities; and in the employment of faculty and staff personnel. Consistent with state and federal law,
reasonable accommodations will be provided to persons with disabilities and to accommodate religious
practices. The University shall work cooperatively with the community in furthering these principles.
b. Complainant: the person who brings a complaint of violation of this policy, who could be an alleged
victim or a third party.
c. Graduate assistant: a graduate student employed by the University as a research assistant or teaching
assistant.
e. Member of the University community: any University student, or faculty or staff member.
Doyle Appx. 480 STATE 727
f. Protected interests: University employment, education, on-campus living, or participation in a
1 July 2015 • www.uiowa.edu/~our/opmanual
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 481 of 533
University activity.
g. Respondent: a person or unit that has been accused of discriminating against one or more individuals.
h. Specific and credible allegations: allegations that provide factual details such as, but not limited to,
time, place, actions, participants, and witnesses. Allegations do not necessarily have to be based on
firsthand observation of events to be "specific and credible," but direct observation normally results in
greater specificity and credibility than indirect knowledge.
i. Supervisor: a person who has authority either: 1) to undertake or recommend tangible employment
decisions (those that significantly change an employee's employment status, such as, but not limited to,
hiring, firing, promoting, demoting, reviewing performance, reassigning, and compensation decisions)
affecting an employee, or 2) to direct the employee's daily work activities.
j. Third-party complainant: a person who brings a complaint alleging an act of discrimination against
someone else.
a. Persons who believe they have been subjected to discrimination in violation of the policy are
encouraged to report it, even if they are not certain whether a violation of this policy has occurred. A
complaint that this policy has been violated may be brought to the Office of Equal Opportunity and
Diversity (EOD) through informal or formal channels by any member of the University community,
including a third party, or by the University itself. A complaint must state specific and credible allegations
of discrimination to warrant an investigation. There is no time limit for bringing a complaint; however, it
may be difficult to substantiate the allegations if they are made after significant time has passed.
Therefore, prompt reporting of complaints is strongly encouraged.
Anyone (victims or others) who wishes to consult with someone about a specific situation without making
a complaint, or who wishes simply to learn more about enforcement of this Human Rights Policy may
contact any of the following offices or organizations:
(1) Office of the Ombudsperson (for faculty, staff, students, and persons not affiliated with the
University);
(2) Faculty and Staff Services/Employee Assistance Program (for faculty or staff);
(3) University Counseling Service (for students);
(4) Women's Resource and Action Center (for faculty, staff, or students).
b. Informal complaints. An informal complaint is a request that the Office of Equal Opportunity and
Diversity seek to reach an informal resolution of the complainant's concerns. The procedures for such
complaints are designed to be flexible so as to enable the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity to
address an individual's situation in the most effective and expeditious manner possible. Resolutions of
informal complaints are accomplished with the assistance of other offices or administrators on campus in
the area relevant to the complaint.
In the case of an informal complaint, the accused party normally will not be informed of the complainant's
action or identity without the consent of the complainant unless circumstances require. When allegations
are addressed through an informal resolution process, no disciplinary action may be taken against the
respondent, and there will be no record of the allegations in the respondent's personnel file or student
disciplinary file, unless the person is notified of the allegations and given an opportunity to respond.
The Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity will issue written findings outlining the basis for its
conclusions. The written finding normally will be issued within 60 days of when the complaint was filed.
When it is not reasonably possible to issue the finding within that time, the Office of Equal Opportunity
and Diversity will notify the alleged victim and the respondent that the finding will be delayed and
indicate the reasons for the delay. This report is provided to the administrative officials responsible for the
area in which the respondent is involved, the alleged victim, the respondent, and the chief administrative
officer in the unit (e.g., the Provost in a complaint filed against a faculty member; the vice president or
dean for the unit in the case of a staff member; or the Vice President for Student Life in the case of a
student) or his or her designee. Third-party complainants will be notified only that the proceedings are
concluded.
a. In the case of formal complaints, the following administrators will review the findings of the Office of
Equal Opportunity and Diversity investigation:
(1) the Office of the Provost, if the respondent is a faculty member or other instructional personnel
(except graduate assistants);
(2) the office of the vice president or dean responsible for the unit employing the person charged, if
the respondent is a staff member (including a graduate assistant, in which case the Dean of the
Graduate College also must be notified in order to determine whether ramifications apply for the
student's academic progress);
(3) the Dean of Students, if the respondent is a student (including a graduate student, in which case
the Dean of the Graduate College also must be notified in order to determine whether ramifications
apply for the student's academic progress).
(4) the appropriate administrator above, if the respondent is a unit.
(1) discuss it with EOD in order to determine, based on EOD's findings and input, appropriate
corrective measures and/or sanctions. If the respondent is a staff member, the administrator will
also consult with the Senior Human Resources Leadership Representative in the unit. If the
respondent is a faculty member, graduate assistant, or unit, the administrator will also consult with
the appropriate dean and departmental executive officer. When a respondent staff member, faculty
member, or graduate assistant is also a student, the administrator and the Dean of Students will also
consult with one another in determining what corrective measures or sanctions should be pursued.
(2) implement appropriate corrective measures and/or sanctions consistent with University
procedures. The administrator must inform EOD in writing of the actions that are taken in response
to EOD's findings.
(3) insure that the alleged victim is informed when action is taken.
c. Violations of the Human Rights Policy may lead to sanctions up to and including termination or
separation from the University. If the respondent is a unit, sanctions may include changes to unit policies
or processes, or other appropriate actions. Sanctions for violations of this policy should be commensurate
with the nature of the violation and the respondent's disciplinary history. It is the responsibility of the
Doyle
appropriate administrator to follow-up withAppx. 482
the parties at a reasonable interval(s)STATE
to assess729
their
compliance with the sanctions imposed. More serious sanctions up to and including termination of
1 July 2015 • www.uiowa.edu/~our/opmanual
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 483 of 533
employment or separation from the University may be imposed in the event that the individual fails to
comply with the sanctions initially imposed.
Formal sanctions imposed in response to alleged violations of this policy will be governed for:
a. faculty members by III-29 Faculty Dispute Procedures and that portion of those procedures dealing
with faculty ethics (III-29.7).
b. staff members by applicable University policies, including III-16 Ethics and Responsibility Statement
for Staff and the applicable discipline and/or grievance procedures (III-28 Conflict Management
Resources for University Staff and/or relevant collective bargaining agreement);
c. graduate assistants, when dismissal is sought, by the procedure for dismissal of graduate assistants (III-
12.4). When sanctions other than dismissal are imposed by the dean of the employing college, a graduate
assistant may appeal through any existing contractual grievance procedures;
In cases where the appeal is denied, such action constitutes final University action on the matter, subject to
appeal to the Board of Regents. In cases where the appeal is successful, in whole or in part, the appeal
officer/designee will advise the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity regarding appropriate measures to
address the issues of concern raised in the appeal.
For complaints that conclude in a finding that there is a reasonable basis to believe that a policy violation has
occurred and sanctions have been imposed, respondents may appeal such findings through the grievance
procedures applicable to them. The respondent may challenge any sanctions imposed as a result of a finding
through available grievance procedures.
a. Retaliation against alleged victims, complainants, and/or witnesses who provide information during an
investigation pursuant to this policy is prohibited by II-11 Anti-Retaliation. Reasonable action will be
taken to assure that alleged victims, complainants, and/or witnesses suffer no retaliation as a result of their
activities with regard to the process.
b. Any retaliation against alleged victims, complainants or witnesses should be reported pursuant to II-11
Anti-Retaliation. Retaliation may result in sanctions against the person committing the retaliatory act(s).
a. This policy shall not be used to bring knowingly false or malicious allegations. Making such allegations
may subject the complaining party to sanctions up to and including termination or separation from the
University. Any such action will be initiated by the appropriate administrator overseeing the
complainant(s). Doyle Appx. 483 STATE 730
www.uiowa.edu/~our/opmanual • 1 July 2015
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 484 of 533
b. In the event the allegations are not substantiated, reasonable steps will be taken to restore the reputation
of the respondent if it was damaged by the proceeding. The respondent may consult with the investigating
office regarding reasonable steps to address such concerns.
3.9 CONFIDENTIALITY.
a. In order to empower community members to voice concerns and bring complaints, the confidentiality
of all parties will be protected to the greatest extent possible. However, confidentiality cannot be
guaranteed.
b. Alleged victims, third-party complainants, and respondents are expected to maintain confidentiality as
well. They are not prohibited from discussing the situation outside of the work or educational
environment. However, the matter should not be discussed with individuals who are members of their
University work or educational environment.
c. Dissemination of documents relating to complaints of Human Rights Policy violations and/or to the
investigation of such complaints, other than as necessary to pursue an appeal, grievance, or other legal or
administrative proceeding, is prohibited.
Page last updated June 2015 by Office of the Senior Vice President for Finance and Operations
b. Complainant: the person who brings a complaint of violation of this policy, who could be an alleged victim or a third party.
c. Graduate assistant: a graduate student employed by the University as a research assistant or teaching assistant.
d. Instructor: a person engaged in teaching students or in evaluation or supervision, direct or indirect, of a student's academic work.
e. Member of the University community: any University student, or faculty or staff member.
f. Protected interests: University employment, education, on-campus living, or participation in a University activity.
g. Respondent: a person or unit that has been accused of discriminating against one or more individuals.
h. Specific and credible allegations: allegations that provide factual details such as, but not limited to, time, place, actions, participants, and witnesses. Allegations do not
necessarily have to be based on firsthand observation of events to be "specific and credible," but direct observation normally results in greater specificity and credibility than
indirect knowledge.
i. Supervisor: a person who has authority either: 1) to undertake or recommend tangible employment decisions (those that significantly change an employee's employment status,
such as, but not limited to, hiring, firing, promoting, demoting, reviewing performance, reassigning, and compensation decisions) affecting an employee, or 2) to direct the
employee's daily work activities.
j. Third-party complainant: a person who brings a complaint alleging an act of discrimination against someone else.
Anyone (victims or others) who wishes to consult with someone about a specific situation without making a complaint, or who wishes simply to learn more about enforcement of
this Human Rights Policy may contact any of the following offices or organizations:
(1) Office of the Ombudsperson (for faculty, staff, students, and persons not affiliated with the University), C108 Seashore Hall;
(2) Employee Assistance Program (for faculty or staff), 121-50 University Services Building;
(4) Women's Resource and Action Center (for faculty, staff, or students), Bowman House.
b. Informal complaints. An informal complaint is a request that the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity seek to reach an informal resolution of the complainant's concerns.
The procedures for such complaints are designed to be flexible so as to enable the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity to address an individual's situation in the most
effective and expeditious manner possible. Resolutions of informal complaints are accomplished with the assistance of other offices or administrators on campus in the area
relevant to the complaint.
In the case of an informal complaint, the accused party normally will not be informed of the complainant's action or identity without the consent of the complainant unless
circumstances require. When allegations are addressed through an informal resolution process, no disciplinary action may be taken against the respondent, and there will be no
record of the allegations in the respondent's personnel file or student disciplinary file, unless the person is notified of the allegations and given an opportunity to respond.
c. Formal complaints. A formal complaint of discrimination involves an impartial investigation of the complainant's allegations by the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity. The
investigation begins when the Office provides written notice to the respondent of the filing of the complaint, the identity of the complainant, and the general allegations of the
complaint. The respondent is then interviewed regarding the specifics of the allegations and given an opportunity to respond fully to the allegations. The Office of Equal
Opportunity and Diversity may also interview other persons believed to have factual knowledge relevant to the allegations. The purpose of the investigation is to establish
whether the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity finds a reasonable basis to conclude, by the preponderance of the evidence, that the respondent violated the Policy on
Human Rights.
Doyle Appx.
34
485 STATE 732
opsmanual.uiowa.edu • 15 August 2017
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 486 of 533
The Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity will issue written findings outlining the basis for its conclusions. The written finding normally will be issued within 60 days of when
the complaint was filed. When it is not reasonably possible to issue the finding within that time, the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity will notify the alleged victim and the
respondent that the finding will be delayed and indicate the reasons for the delay. This report is provided to the administrative officials responsible for the area in which the
respondent is involved, the alleged victim, the respondent, and the chief administrative officer in the unit (e.g., the Provost in a complaint filed against a faculty member; the vice
president or dean for the unit in the case of a staff member; or the Vice President for Student Life in the case of a student) or his or her designee. Third-party complainants will
be notified only that the proceedings are concluded.
(1) the Office of the Provost, if the respondent is a faculty member or other instructional personnel (except graduate assistants);
(2) the office of the vice president or dean responsible for the unit employing the person charged, if the respondent is a staff member (including a graduate assistant, in
which case the Dean of the Graduate College also must be notified in order to determine whether ramifications apply for the student's academic progress);
(3) the Dean of Students, if the respondent is a student (including a graduate student, in which case the Dean of the Graduate College also must be notified in order to
determine whether ramifications apply for the student's academic progress).
(1) discuss it with EOD in order to determine, based on EOD's findings and input, appropriate corrective measures and/or sanctions. If the respondent is a staff
member, the administrator will also consult with the Senior Human Resources Leadership Representative in the unit. If the respondent is a faculty member, graduate
assistant, or unit, the administrator will also consult with the appropriate dean and departmental executive officer. When a respondent staff member, faculty member, or
graduate assistant is also a student, the administrator and the Dean of Students will also consult with one another in determining what corrective measures or
sanctions should be pursued.
(2) implement appropriate corrective measures and/or sanctions consistent with University procedures. The administrator must inform EOD in writing of the actions that
are taken in response to EOD's findings.
(3) insure that the alleged victim is informed when action is taken.
c. Violations of the Human Rights Policy may lead to sanctions up to and including termination or separation from the University. If the respondent is a unit, sanctions may include
changes to unit policies or processes, or other appropriate actions. Sanctions for violations of this policy should be commensurate with the nature of the violation and the
respondent's disciplinary history. It is the responsibility of the appropriate administrator to follow-up with the parties at a reasonable interval(s) to assess their compliance with
the sanctions imposed. More serious sanctions up to and including termination of employment or separation from the University may be imposed in the event that the individual
fails to comply with the sanctions initially imposed.
Formal sanctions imposed in response to alleged violations of this policy will be governed for:
a. faculty members by III-29 Faculty Dispute Procedures and that portion of those procedures dealing with faculty ethics (III-29.7).
b. staff members by applicable Regent Merit System Rules and University policies, including III-16 Ethics and Responsibility Statement for Staff, and the applicable grievance
procedures, including III-28 Conflict Management Resources for University Staff;
c. graduate assistants, when dismissal is sought, by the procedure for dismissal of graduate assistants (III-12.4). When sanctions other than dismissal are imposed by the dean of
the employing college, a graduate assistant may appeal through those procedures established for graduate assistant employees;
In cases where the appeal is denied, such action constitutes final University action on the matter, subject to appeal to the Board of Regents. In cases where the appeal is successful, in
whole or in part, the appeal officer/designee will advise the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity regarding appropriate measures to address the issues of concern raised in the
appeal.
For complaints that conclude in a finding that there is a reasonable basis to believe that a policy violation has occurred and sanctions have been imposed, respondents may appeal such
findings through the grievance procedures applicable to them. The respondent may challenge any sanctions imposed as a result of a finding through available grievance procedures.
b. Any retaliation against alleged victims, complainants or witnesses should be reported pursuant to II-11 Anti-Retaliation. Retaliation may result in sanctions against the person
committing the retaliatory act(s).
b. In the event the allegations are not substantiated, reasonable steps will be taken to restore the reputation of the respondent if it was damaged by the proceeding. The
respondent may consult with the investigating office regarding reasonable steps to address such concerns.
3.9 Confidentiality
a. In order to empower community members to voice concerns and bring complaints, the confidentiality of all parties will be protected to the greatest extent possible. However,
confidentiality cannot be guaranteed.
b. Alleged victims, third-party complainants, and respondents are expected to maintain confidentiality as well. They are not prohibited from discussing the situation outside of the
work or educational environment. However, the matter should not be discussed with individuals who are members of their University work or educational environment.
c. Dissemination of documents relating to complaints of Human Rights Policy violations and/or to the investigation of such complaints, other than as necessary to pursue an
appeal, grievance, or other legal or administrative proceeding, is prohibited.
d. Failure to maintain confidentiality by a respondent may be considered to be a form of retaliation in violation of II-3.7 of this policy. Failure to maintain confidentiality by any party
(alleged victim, third-party complainant, or respondent) may result in sanctions.
Doyle Appx.
36
487 STATE 734
opsmanual.uiowa.edu • 15 August 2017
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 488 of 533
You are viewing an archived web page, collected at the request of University of Iowa Libraries using
hide
Archive-It. This page was captured on 22:54:18 Jul 02, 2010, and is part of the University of Iowa
Archives collection.
The information on this web page may be out of date. See All versions of this
archived page. Note that this document was downloaded, and not saved because it was a duplicate of a
previously captured version (20:58:39 Oct 4, 2009). HTTP headers presented here are from the original
capture.
The University of Iowa prohibits discrimination in employment, educational programs, and activities on the basis of
race, national origin, color, creed, religion, sex, age, disability, veteran status, sexual orientation, gender identity, or
associational preference. The University also affirms its commitment to providing equal opportunities and equal
access to University facilities. For additional information on nondiscrimination policies, contact the Office of Equal
Opportunity and Diversity, (319) 335-0705 (voice) and (319) 335-0697 (text), 202 Jessup Hall, The University of
Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1316.
Go forward one step to II-7 Disability Protection Policy and Accessibility Statement
Page last updated August 2009 by Office of the Senior Vice President for Finance and Operations
The University of Iowa prohibits discrimination in employment, educational programs, and activities on the basis of
race, creed, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, pregnancy, disability, genetic information, status as a U.S.
veteran, service in the U.S. military, sexual orientation, gender identity, associational preferences, or any other
classification that deprives the person of consideration as an individual. The university also affirms its commitment to
providing equal opportunities and equal access to university facilities. For additional information on nondiscrimination
policies, contact the Director, Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity, the University of Iowa, 202 Jessup Hall,
Iowa City, IA, 52242-1316, 319-335-0705 (voice), 319-335-0697 (TDD), diversity@uiowa.edu.
Go forward one step to II-7 Disability Protection Policy and Accessibility Statement
Page last updated June 2015 by Office of the Senior Vice President for Finance and Operations
9.1 GENERAL.
Complaints alleging discrimination based on race, creed, color, national origin, age, gender, sexual harassment,
disability, sexual orientation, gender identity, or associational preference may be pursued in several places on
campus, including the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity. Complaints may also be pursued based on
protected veteran status.
The Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity welcomes confidential inquiries from individuals wishing to
discuss an incident or obtain information about the Human Rights Policy (see II-3). No action will be taken
without the individual's consent. In the event the individual wishes to file a complaint, the Office will pursue
either an informal or a formal complaint process. Confidentiality and retaliation apply to complaints filed under
the Human Rights Policy, as well as the same procedural protections for both parties (see II-5.13).
Copies of the Human Rights Policy and the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity Procedures for
Discrimination Complaints are available upon request from the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity.
[top]
Page last updated August 2009 by Office of the Senior Vice President for Finance and Operations
14.1 Rationale
14.2 Policy
14.3 Scope of Policy
14.4 Bringing a Complaint
14.5 Informal Resolution of Complaints
14.6 Investigation of Formal Complaints
14.7 Process for Disciplinary Action
14.8 Applicable Procedures
14.9 Isolated Behavior
14.10 Protection of Alleged Victims, Complainants, and Others
14.11 Protection of the Respondent
14.12 Confidentiality
14.1 RATIONALE.
The purpose of this policy is to prevent harassment within the University of Iowa community and to provide a
process for addressing harassment if and when it does occur. The University of Iowa is committed to
maintaining an environment that recognizes the inherent worth and dignity of every person, and that fosters
tolerance, sensitivity, understanding, and mutual respect. This commitment requires that the highest value be
placed on the use of reason and that harassment in the University community be renounced as repugnant and
inimical to its goals. Harassment destroys the mutual trust which binds members of the community in their
pursuit of truth.
The University also is committed strongly to academic freedom and free speech. An educational institution has
a duty to provide a forum in which free speech and differences of opinion are actively encouraged and
facilitated, and where opinions and deeply held beliefs are challenged and debated. Critical to this mission is
providing a nondiscriminatory environment that is conducive to learning. Respect for these rights requires that
members of the University community tolerate expressions of opinion that differ from their own or that they
may find abhorrent.
This policy addresses harassment based on any classification covered by law and/or II-3 Human Rights (with
the exception of sexual harassment, which is addressed in II-4 Sexual Harassment), as well as harassment based
on other factors as set forth herein. Doyle Appx. 491 STATE 738
[top]
115
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 492 of 533
14.2 POLICY.
a. Definition of harassment as it relates to conduct. "Harassment" means intentional conduct directed
toward an identifiable person or persons that is sufficiently severe, pervasive, or persistent that it
interferes with work, educational performance, on-campus living, or participation in a University activity
on- or off-campus.
b. Definition of harassment as it relates to the content of speech. When an allegation of harassment rests
upon the content of oral, written, or symbolic speech, it falls within this definition only if 1) the content
consists of those personally abusive epithets which are inherently likely to provoke a violent reaction, 2)
the content is a serious expression of an intent to commit an act of unlawful violence to a particular
individual or group of individuals, or 3) the content is a threat to a person or group of persons with the
intent of placing the victim in fear of bodily harm or death. Conduct that constitutes a protected exercise
of an individual's rights under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution (and related
principles of academic freedom) shall not be deemed a violation of this policy.
Note: Sexual harassment is addressed by the University's Policy on Sexual Harassment (II-4).
c. Evidence of harassment. Behavior that may be considered evidence of prohibited harassment, if it
meets the definition set forth in paragraph a above, includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(1) repeated contact with another in person, by telephone, in writing, or through electronic means,
after the recipient has made clear that such contact is unwelcome.
(2) physical, visual, or verbal behavior directed toward another person or an identifiable group of
persons that is intended to be or is reasonably likely to be interpreted as threatening or intimidating.
Behavior that constitutes speech is included within this section only to the extent to which it has a
direct tendency to incite an immediate violent reaction in a reasonable person or to place a
reasonable person in fear of imminent physical harm.
(3) harassment proscribed by the Iowa Criminal Code, Chapter 708, including, for example,
stalking (708.11), the placement of simulated explosives (708.7), ordering merchandise or services
with intent to annoy (708.7), or false reports to police (708.7).
d. Academic freedom. All proceedings under this section shall respect the principles of academic freedom
stated in the Statement on Tenure and Academic Vitality at The University of Iowa (III-10.1a(2)), which
commits the University to the principle that "free inquiry and expression are essential to the maintenance
of excellence."
e. Penalty enhancement. The University reserves the right to impose more severe sanctions on individuals
whose actions in violation of this policy are motivated by race, creed, color, national origin, age, sex,
disability, sexual orientation, gender identity, or veteran status of the victim.
f. Evidence considered. In determining whether alleged conduct constitutes prohibited harassment, all
available evidence and the totality of circumstances will be considered, including the context in which the
alleged incident(s) occurred. Although repeated incidents generally create a stronger claim of harassment,
a single serious incident can be sufficient. Determinations will be made on a case-by-case basis.
g. Other definitions. Definitions of other terms used in this policy:
(1) Academic or administrative officer includes the following:
(a) Collegiate deans (including associate deans and assistant deans),
(b) Faculty members with administrative responsibilities at the level of departmental
Doyle
executive officer (DEO) Appx. 492
or above, STATE 739
116
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 493 of 533
(c) Any staff member whose primary job responsibility is to provide advice regarding a
student's academic pursuits,
(d) A faculty member serving as departmental (or collegiate) director of undergraduate or
graduate studies,
(e) The President, Director of Equal Opportunity and Diversity, vice presidents (including
assistant and associate vice presidents), and Executive Vice President and Provost (including
assistant, associate, and vice provosts), and those persons' designees,
(f) Directors and supervisors in an employment context, other than Department of Public
Safety personnel when receiving criminal complaints or reports, and
(g) Human resource representatives.
(2) Alleged victim: a person who allegedly has been harassed in violation of this policy.
(3) Complainant: the person who brings a complaint of violation of this policy, who could be an
alleged victim, a third party, or an academic or administrative officer of the University.
(4) Graduate assistant: a graduate student employed by the University as a research assistant or
teaching assistant.
(5) Human resources representative: the individual designated as departmental authority on human
resource policies and procedures, and all central human resources staff.
(6) Member of the University community: any University student, or faculty or staff member.
(7) Protected interests: University employment, education, on-campus living, or participation in a
University activity.
(8) Respondent: a person who has been accused of harassment in a formal complaint.
(9) Specific and credible allegations: allegations that provide factual details such as, but not limited
to, time, place, actions, participants, and witnesses. Allegations do not necessarily have to be based
on first-hand observation of events to be "specific and credible," but direct observation normally
results in greater specificity and credibility than indirect knowledge.
(10) Supervisor: a person who has authority either: 1) to undertake or recommend tangible
employment decisions (those that significantly change an employee's employment status, such as,
but not limited to, hiring, firing, promoting, demoting, reassigning, and compensation decisions)
affecting an employee, or 2) to direct the employee's daily work activities.
(11) Third-party complainant: a person who brings a complaint alleging that someone else has been
harassed in violation of this policy.
[top]
a. Employees and students. This policy applies to all University faculty, staff, and students with respect to
conduct that occurs:
(1) on any University property,
(2) at University-related activities occurring off-campus,
(3) while the individual is acting in an official capacity or while conducting University business, or
(4) on-campus or off-campus and has the purpose or reasonably foreseeable effect of unreasonably
Doyle
interfering with an individual's Appx.
protected 493
interests. STATE 740
117
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 494 of 533
b. Visitors to campus. The University will make reasonable efforts to prevent and address harassment of
its faculty, staff, or students by persons conducting business with or visiting the University, even though
such persons are not directly affiliated with the University.
[top]
a. A complaint that this policy has been violated may be brought through informal or formal channels by
any member of the University community, including a third party, or by the University itself. A complaint
must state specific and credible allegations to warrant an investigation. There is no time limit for bringing
a complaint; however, it may be difficult to substantiate the allegations made in a complaint brought after
significant time has passed. Therefore, prompt reporting of complaints is strongly encouraged.
b. Substantial weight will be given to the wishes of the alleged victim when determining whether to
investigate a complaint, but the University may investigate a complaint even without the alleged victim's
consent if circumstances warrant (such as when there are multiple complaints against the same person or
allegations are particularly egregious).
c. Persons who wish to consult with someone about a specific situation on a confidential basis or learn
more about enforcement of this Anti-Harassment Policy may contact any of the following offices or
organizations:
(1) Office of the Ombudsperson (for faculty, staff, or students)
(2) Faculty and Staff Services (for faculty or staff)
(3) University Counseling Service (for students)
(4) Women's Resource and Action Center (for faculty, staff, or students)
Representatives of these offices or other support persons may accompany an alleged victim during the
investigation process if the alleged victim so desires.
These offices are exempt from the reporting requirements set forth in II-14.5e. Other offices may be
required to report allegations as described in II-14.5e.
[top]
a. A complaint may be brought informally to any academic or administrative officer of the University (as
defined in II-14.2g(1)). If the complaint alleges harassment based on a protected classification as defined
by II-3 Human Rights (race, creed, color, national origin, age, sex, disability, sexual orientation, or gender
identity), the complaint may be brought to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity, 202 Jessup
Hall.
b. The academic or administrative officer will:
(1) counsel the complainant as to the options available under this policy and, at the complainant's
request, will help the complainant resolve the complaint informally and/or refer the complainant to
the appropriate office as described in II-14.6a so that the complainant may bring a formal
complaint; and
(2) take appropriate interim action, which may include those actions described in II-14.10, to
address the alleged behavior and protect the health or safety of the alleged victim, complainant,
and/or witnesses.
c. The following assistance is available to the academic or administrative officer:
(1) The Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity will assist in determining whether there is a
Doyle
potential policy violation related to aAppx.
protected494 STATE
classification, and whether reporting741
pursuant to
paragraph e below is required.
118
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 495 of 533
(2) For situations involving faculty and/or staff, the Behavior Risk Management team is available to
assist with assessing situations, planning the actions needed, and carrying out those actions. This
team may be accessed by contacting Faculty and Staff Services, 121-50 University Services
Building.
(3) For situations involving students, contact the Office of the Vice President for Student Services,
249 Iowa Memorial Union.
d. When a complaint is brought informally, the person(s) charged in the complaint will not ordinarily be
informed of the complaint without the consent of the alleged victim unless circumstances require (such as
when there are multiple complaints against the same person or allegations are particularly egregious). No
disciplinary action can be taken against a person charged in an informal complaint, and there will be no
record of the complaint in the person's employment or student disciplinary file, unless the person is
notified of the charges and given an opportunity to respond.
e. Any academic or administrative officer of the University who becomes aware of specific and credible
allegations of harassment based on a protected classification (race, creed, color, national origin, age, sex,
disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity), whether through the report of a complainant (including a
third party) or otherwise, shall report the allegations promptly to the Office of Equal Opportunity and
Diversity (except for allegations against a student regarding conduct occurring in the residence halls,
which shall be reported to the Office of the Vice President for Student Services) for assistance in
evaluating the situation and determining an appropriate course of action, even if the alleged victim has
requested that no action be taken. If there is a supervisory relationship between the complainant and/or
victim and the respondent, the appropriate course of action will include development of a plan to avoid
any perceived or actual conflict of interest until the complaint is resolved. The initial report should be
made by telephone, but a written report also must be made after the complaint is resolved using the Office
of Equal Opportunity and Diversity Informal Harassment Complaint Resolution form, which requires
disclosure of the employment or student status of the alleged victim(s), the complainant(s) (if other than
the alleged victim), and the person(s) charged; the department(s) with which those persons are affiliated; a
summary of the allegations; and a description of the steps taken to resolve the complaint. If the person
charged is informed of the existence of the informal complaint, the names of the parties must be provided
to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity. If the person charged is not informed of the complaint,
then the names of the parties shall not be provided to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity.
f. Reasonable efforts will be made to process complaints in a timely manner, giving consideration to the
nature of the allegations and the circumstances surrounding the complaint process.
g. It is the responsibility of the academic or administrative officer who facilitates the informal resolution
of the complaint to monitor compliance with the terms of the informal resolution. Sanctions up to and
including termination of employment or separation from the University may be imposed in the event that
an individual fails to comply with the terms of the informal resolution.
[top]
a. A formal complaint pursuant to this policy must be brought to one of the following offices for
investigation depending upon the status of the respondent and the nature of the allegations:
(1) Protected class harassment. If the complaint alleges harassment based on a classification
covered by II-3 Human Rights (race, creed, color, national origin, age, sex, disability, sexual
orientation, gender identity, or any other classification that deprives the person of consideration as
an individual), a formal complaint should be brought to the Office of Equal Opportunity and
Diversity regardless of the status of the respondent.
(2) Other harassment. If the complaint alleges harassment that is not based on a classification
Doyle(race,
covered by the II-3 Human Rights Appx. 495
creed, STATE
color, national origin, age, 742 sexual
sex, disability,
orientation, gender identity, or any other classification that deprives the person of consideration as
119
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 496 of 533
an individual), a person should bring a formal complaint to one of the following offices depending
on the status of the respondent:
(a) Faculty or instructor. If the respondent is a faculty member, teaching assistant, or other
instructor, a formal complaint should be brought to the respondent's collegiate dean or to the
Office of the Executive Vice President and Provost;
(b) Staff member. If the respondent is a staff member (professional and scientific, organized
merit staff, or non-organized merit staff), a formal complaint should be brought to the senior
human resources representative for the unit employing the respondent;
(c) Student. If the respondent is a student, a formal complaint should be brought to the Office
of the Vice President for Student Services and Dean of Students. However, if the incident
occurred in the residence halls, a formal complaint also may be brought to the Director of
University Housing.
b. A formal complaint may be brought after an informal resolution was not successfully reached, or
may be brought immediately without pursuing informal resolution.
c. The purpose of the investigation is to establish whether there is a reasonable basis for believing
that a violation of this policy has occurred. In conducting the investigation, the investigating office
will make reasonable efforts to interview the alleged victim, the complainant (if other than the
alleged victim), and the respondent, and may interview other persons believed to have pertinent
factual knowledge, as well as review any relevant documentary evidence. At all times, the
investigating office will take steps to ensure confidentiality to the extent possible.
d. When a formal complaint is brought, the respondent will be informed of the allegations, the
identity of the complainant, and the facts surrounding the allegations. The investigation will afford
the respondent an opportunity to respond to the allegations and evidence provided by the
complainant and/or alleged victim, and to provide a statement of the facts as perceived by the
respondent.
e. At the conclusion of the investigation, the investigating office will issue a written finding which
will summarize the evidence gathered and state whether or not there is a reasonable basis for
believing that a violation of this policy has occurred. The written finding will normally be issued
within 45 days of when the complaint was filed. When it is not reasonably possible to issue the
finding within that time, the investigating office will notify the alleged victim and the respondent
that the finding will be delayed and indicate the reasons for the delay. The alleged victim and the
respondent will receive a copy of the written finding, which is to remain confidential as defined by
II-14.12c. Third-party complainants will be notified only that the proceedings are concluded.
f. If the investigating office finds a reasonable basis for believing that a violation of this policy has
occurred, the matter will be referred to the appropriate administrator for further consideration as
outlined in II-14.7 below.
[top]
a. The following administrators will review the finding of the investigating office:
(1) the Office of the Executive Vice President and Provost, if the respondent is a faculty
member or other instructional personnel (except graduate assistants);
(2) the office of the vice president or dean responsible for the unit employing the person
charged, if the respondent is a staff member;
(3) the Office of the Vice President for Student Services and Dean of Students, if the
respondent is a student;
Doyle
(4) the Office of the Dean Appx.
of the 496
Graduate STATE
College, if the respondent 743 assistant.
is a graduate
120
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 497 of 533
b. The administrator may:
(1) accept all or any part of the findings of the investigating office;
(2) not accept all or any part of the findings of the investigating office;
(3) reach a negotiated settlement of the complaint with the respondent; or
(4) initiate formal disciplinary action.
c. Violations of this Anti-Harassment Policy may lead to disciplinary sanctions up to and including
termination or separation from the University. Sanctions for violations of this policy should be
commensurate with the nature of the violation and the respondent's disciplinary history. Those who
violate this policy should bear the consequences of their actions, even if factors such as substance
abuse or personal problems contribute to misconduct. When the offense is serious, it is appropriate
to consider separation from the University even in cases of first offense, and even when the
respondent experiences remorse and/or did not intend to cause the resulting degree of harm.
d. In addition to other disciplinary action, persons who are found to have violated this policy may
be required to participate in group counseling or personal therapy sessions, complete community
service, enroll in a specific academic course, attend an educational workshop, and/or make
restitution for economic damages caused by their behavior. When the respondent is a faculty or
staff member, the Office of Faculty and Staff Services, 121-50 University Service Building, is
available to assist with locating appropriate resources. When the respondent is a student, University
Counseling Service, 3223 Westlawn, is available to assist with locating appropriate resources.
e. It is the responsibility of the appropriate administrator to monitor compliance with the
disciplinary and/or remedial sanctions imposed. More serious sanctions, up to and including
termination of employment or separation from the University, may be imposed in the event that the
individual fails to comply with the sanctions initially imposed.
[top]
a. faculty members will be governed by the Faculty Dispute Procedures (III-29) and that portion of
those procedures dealing with faculty ethics (III-29.7).
b. staff members will be governed by applicable University policies, including the Ethics and
Responsibility Statement for Staff (III-16), and the applicable discipline and/or grievance
procedures (III-28 and/or relevant collective bargaining agreement);
c. graduate assistants, when dismissal is sought, will be governed by the procedure for dismissal of
graduate assistants (III-12.4). When disciplinary action other than dismissal is taken by the Dean of
the Graduate College, a graduate assistant may appeal through any existing contractual grievance
procedures;
d. students will be governed by Judicial Procedure for Alleged Violations of the Code of Student
Life. Both the Code of Student Life and the Judicial Procedure are published and distributed to
students annually in Policies and Regulations Affecting Students.
[top]
This section addresses isolated behavior that does not rise to the level of a violation of this policy.
However, it should be understood that a single incident can under certain circumstances constitute
harassment in violation of this policy. The purpose of this section is preventative, in that it authorizes and
encourages appropriate intervention designed to avoid a violation of this policy. However, this section
shall not apply to constitutionally protected speech as provided in II-14.2c above.
Doyle
a. Isolated behavior of the kind Appx.
described 497 which does not rise to
in II-14.2, STATE
the level744
of harassment
but which if repeated could rise to that level, demonstrates insensitivity that may warrant remedial
121
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 498 of 533
measures. Academic or administrative officers who become aware of such behavior in their areas
should counsel those who have engaged in the behavior. Such counsel should include a clear
statement that the behavior is not acceptable and should cease, information about the potential
consequences if such behavior persists, and a recommendation, as appropriate, to undertake an
educational program designed to help the person(s) understand the harm caused by the behavior.
b. After such counseling occurs, if a person continues to engage in the conduct described in II-
14.9a, he or she may be deemed to have engaged in harassment.
[top]
a. Alleged victims will be informed of relevant procedural steps taken during the investigation and
any interim protective measures taken.
b. Throughout the investigation and resolution of a complaint, steps will be taken to protect alleged
victims, complainants, witnesses, and others from harm caused by continuation of the alleged
harassing behavior.
c. Retaliation against alleged victims, complainants, and/or witnesses who provide information
during an investigation pursuant to this policy is prohibited by II-11 Anti-Retaliation. Reasonable
action will be taken to assure that alleged victims, complainants, and/or witnesses suffer no
retaliation as a result of their activities with regard to the process.
d. Steps that may be taken to protect alleged victims, complainants, witnesses, and others from
continued harassment and/or retaliation might include:
(1) lateral transfers of one or more of the parties in an employment setting and a comparable
move if a classroom setting is involved, and
(2) arrangement that academic and/or employment evaluations concerning complainants or
others be made by an appropriate individual other than the respondent.
e. Any retaliation against alleged victims, complainants or witnesses should be reported pursuant to
the Anti-Retaliation Policy (II-11). Retaliation may result in disciplinary action against the person
committing the retaliatory act(s).
f. In extraordinary circumstances, the Executive Vice President and Provost, a dean, a DEO, or any
vice president may, at any time during or after an investigation of a harassment complaint, suspend
or partially restrict from employment any employee accused of harassment if the Executive Vice
President and Provost, dean, DEO, or vice president finds that it is reasonably certain that:
(1) the alleged harassment has occurred, and
(2) serious and immediate harm will ensue if the person continues his or her employment.
Similarly, if the respondent is a student, interim sanctions may be imposed pursuant to Section 10
of the Judicial Procedure for Alleged Violation of the Code of Student Life.
[top]
a. This policy shall not be used to bring knowingly false or malicious charges. Bringing such a
charge constitutes a violation of this policy, and may subject the complaining party to remedial
and/or disciplinary action up to and including termination or separation from the University. Any
such disciplinary action will be initiated by the appropriate administrator overseeing the
complainant(s).
Doyle
b. In the event the allegations are notAppx. 498 reasonable steps will STATE
substantiated, be taken to745
restore the
reputation of the respondent if it was damaged by the proceeding. The respondent may consult with
122
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 499 of 533
the investigating office regarding reasonable steps to address such concerns.
[top]
14.12 CONFIDENTIALITY.
a. In order to empower community members to voice concerns and bring complaints, the
confidentiality of all parties will be protected to the greatest extent possible. However, legal
obligations may require the University to take some action once it is made aware that harassment
may be occurring, even when the alleged victim is reluctant to proceed. Appropriate University
officials will be consulted, including the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity when the
complaint alleges harassment based on a protected classification (see II-14.5e), and information will
be shared only with those individuals who need to know it to implement this policy.
b. The parties to a complaint (alleged victims, third-party complainants, and respondents) are
expected to maintain confidentiality as well. Parties are not prohibited from discussing the situation
outside of the work or educational environment. However, the matter should not be discussed in the
work or educational environment.
c. Dissemination of documents relating to a complaint and/or investigation, other than as necessary
to pursue an appeal, grievance, or other legal or administrative proceeding, is prohibited.
d. Failure to maintain confidentiality by a respondent may be considered to be a form of retaliation
in violation of II-14.10c of this policy. Failure to maintain confidentiality by any party (alleged
victim, third-party complainant, or respondent) may result in disciplinary action.
[top]
Go forward one step to II-18 Conflicts of Commitment and Interest (Chapters 15-17 are reserved for future use.)
Page last updated August 2009 by Office of the Senior Vice President for Finance and Operations
14.1 Rationale
14.2 Policy
14.3 Scope of Policy
14.4 Bringing a Complaint
14.5 Informal Resolution of Complaints
14.6 Investigation of Formal Complaints
14.7 Process for Disciplinary Action
14.8 Applicable Procedures
14.9 Isolated Behavior
14.10 Protection of Alleged Victims, Complainants, and Others
14.11 Protection of the Respondent
14.12 Confidentiality
14.1 RATIONALE.
The purpose of this policy is to prevent harassment within The University of Iowa community and to provide a process for addressing
all forms of harassment if and when it does occur. The University of Iowa is committed to maintaining an environment that recognizes
the inherent worth and dignity of every person, and that fosters tolerance, sensitivity, understanding, and mutual respect. This
commitment requires that the highest value be placed on the use of reason and that any harassment in the University community be
renounced as repugnant and inimical to its goals. Harassment destroys the mutual trust which binds members of the community in their
pursuit of truth.
The University also is committed strongly to academic freedom and free speech. An educational institution has a duty to provide a
forum in which free speech and differences of opinion are actively encouraged and facilitated, and where opinions and deeply held
beliefs are challenged and debated. Critical to this mission is providing a nondiscriminatory environment that is conducive to learning.
Respect for these rights requires that members of the University community tolerate expressions of opinion that differ from their own
or that they may find abhorrent.
This policy addresses harassment in all forms based on any classification covered by law and/or II-3 Human Rights (with the exception
of sexual harassment, which is addressed in II-4 Sexual Harassment) and IV-2 Sexual Misconduct Involving Students, as well as
harassment based on other factors as set forth in this policy.
[top]
14.2 POLICY.
Harassment of any member of the University community is prohibited.
a. Definition of harassment as it relates to conduct. "Harassment" means intentional conduct directed toward an identifiable
person or persons that is sufficiently severe, pervasive, or persistent that it interferes with work, educational performance, on-
campus living, or participation in a University activity on or off campus.
b. Definition of harassment as it relates to the content of speech. When an allegation of harassment rests upon the content of
oral, written, or symbolic speech, it falls within this definition only if 1) the content consists of those personally abusive
c. Evidence of harassment. Behavior that may constitute, or be evidence of, prohibited harassment includes, but is not limited
to, the following:
(1) repeated contact with another in person, by telephone, in writing, or through electronic means (see also II-19
Acceptable Use of Information Technology Resources), after the recipient has made clear that such contact is
unwelcome.
(2) physical, visual, or verbal behavior directed toward another person or an identifiable group of persons that is
intended to be or is reasonably likely to be interpreted as threatening or intimidating. Behavior that constitutes speech is
included within this section only to the extent to which it has a direct tendency to incite an immediate violent reaction
in a reasonable person or to place a reasonable person in fear of imminent physical harm.
(3) harassment proscribed by the Iowa Criminal Code, Chapter 708, including, for example, stalking, the placement of
simulated explosives, ordering merchandise or services with intent to annoy, or false reports to police.
d. Academic freedom. All proceedings under this section shall respect the principles of academic freedom stated in the
Statement on Tenure and Academic Vitality at The University of Iowa (III-10.1a(2)), which commits the University to the
principle that "free inquiry and expression are essential to the maintenance of excellence."
e. Penalty enhancement. The University reserves the right to impose more severe sanctions on individuals whose actions in
violation of this policy are motivated by race, creed, color, national origin, age, sex, disability, genetic information, sexual
orientation, gender identity, or veteran status of the victim.
f. In determining whether alleged conduct constitutes prohibited harassment, the investigator will consider all available
information and will review the totality of circumstances, including the context in which the alleged incident(s) occurred.
Although repeated incidents generally create a stronger claim of harassment, a single serious incident can be sufficient.
Determinations will be made on a case-by-case basis.
(b) Faculty members with administrative responsibilities at the level of departmental executive officer (DEO) or
above,
(c) Any staff member whose primary job responsibility is to provide advice regarding a student's academic
pursuits or other University-related activities,
(d) A faculty member serving as departmental (or collegiate) director or coordinator of undergraduate or
graduate studies, or as a director or coordinator of any departmental, collegiate, or University off-campus
academic program (including any study-abroad program),
(e) The President, Director of Equal Opportunity and Diversity, vice presidents (including assistant and
associate vice presidents), and Provost (including assistant and associate provosts), and those persons' designees,
(f) Directors and supervisors in an employment context, including faculty and staff who supervise student
employees, in relation to matters involving the employees they supervise (other than Department of Public
Safety personnel when receiving criminal complaints or reports), and
(3) Complainant: the person who brings a complaint of violation of this policy, who could be an alleged victim, a third
(4) Graduate assistant: a graduate student employed by the University as a research assistant or teaching assistant.
(5) Human resources representative: the individual designated as a unit's departmental authority on human resource
policies and procedures, and all central human resources staff.
(6) Instructor: a person engaged in teaching students or in evaluation or supervision, direct or indirect, of a student's
academic work.
(7) Member of the University community: any University student, or faculty or staff member.
(8) Protected interests: University employment, education, on-campus living, or participation in a University activity.
(10) Specific and credible allegations: allegations that provide factual details such as, but not limited to, time, place,
actions, participants, and witnesses. Allegations do not necessarily have to be based on firsthand observation of events
to be "specific and credible," but direct observation normally results in greater specificity and credibility than indirect
knowledge.
(11) Supervisor: a person who has authority either: 1) to undertake or recommend tangible employment decisions (those
that significantly change an employee's employment status, such as, but not limited to, hiring, firing, promoting,
demoting, reviewing performance, reassigning, and compensation decisions) affecting an employee, or 2) to direct the
employee's daily work activities.
(12) Third-party complainant: a person who brings a complaint alleging that someone else has been harassed.
[top]
a. Acts by employees and students. The University's prohibition of harassment as defined by II-14.2 above applies to acts of
faculty, other instructors, staff, or students occurring in one or more of the following circumstances:
(2) at any location, including through electronic media such as e-mail or social networking websites, and involving any
University faculty, staff, or students, provided that:
(a) The incident occurs at a University-sponsored activity or during an event sponsored by an organization
affiliated with the University, including a student organization;
(b) The accused or the complainant was acting in an official capacity for the University during the incident;
(c) The accused or the complainant was conducting University business during the incident;
(d) The conduct has the purpose or reasonably foreseeable effect of substantially interfering with the work or
educational performance of UI students, faculty, or staff;
(e) The conduct creates an intimidating or hostile environment for anyone who is involved in or seeks to
participate in University employment, education, on-campus living, or other University-sponsored activities; or
(f) The conduct demonstrates that the individual poses a reasonable threat to campus safety and security.
b. Acts by persons other than employees or students. The University will make reasonable efforts to address harassment of its
faculty, other instructors, staff, or students by persons participating in University-related programs or activities, conducting
business with or visiting the University, even if such persons are not directly affiliated with the University. Reports of
harassment by visitors to campus and other persons not directly affiliated with the University should be made to an academic or
administrative officer or the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity.
[top]
a. Individuals who believe they have experienced harassment are encouraged to report it, even if they are not certain whether a
(1) Complaints that a student violated the rights of any member of the University community may be investigated under
a process initiated by the Dean of Students (such as, but not limited to, the Code of Student Life;
(2) Complaints that a faculty member violated the rights of any member of the University community may be
investigated under a process initiated by the Provost (such as, but not limited to, III-15 Professional Ethics and
Academic Responsibility);
(3) Complaints that a staff member violated the rights of any member of the University community may be investigated
under a process initiated by the Senior Human Resources Leadership Representative for the staff member's unit (such
as, but not limited to, III-16 Ethics and Responsibilities for University of Iowa Staff.
b. A complaint that this policy has been violated may be brought through informal or formal channels by any member of the
University community, including a third party, or by the University itself. A complaint must state specific and credible
allegations of harassment to warrant an investigation. There is no time limit for bringing a complaint; however, it may be
difficult to substantiate the allegations if they are made after significant time has passed. Therefore, prompt reporting of
complaints is strongly encouraged.
c. Substantial weight will be given to the wishes of the alleged victim when determining how to respond to a complaint.
However, the University may investigate the allegations even without the alleged victim's consent, if circumstances warrant
(such as when there are multiple complaints of harassment involving the same person or allegations are particularly egregious).
d. Anyone (victims or others) who wishes to consult with someone about a specific situation without making a complaint, or
who wishes simply to learn more about enforcement of this Anti-Harassment Policy may contact any of the following offices
or organizations:
(2) Faculty and Staff Services/Employee Assistance Program (for faculty or staff)
(4) Women's Resource and Action Center (for faculty, staff, or students)
These offices are exempt from the reporting requirements set forth below in II-14.5e. In addition, staff in these offices and
organizations generally have professional or legal obligations to keep communications with their clients confidential. Faculty
and staff in other University offices typically do not have confidentiality obligations and may be required to report allegations
as described below in II-14.5e.
[top]
a. A complaint may be brought informally to any academic or administrative officer of the University (as defined above in II-
14.2g(1)). If the complaint alleges harassment based on a protected classification as defined by II-3 Human Rights (race, creed,
color, national origin, age, sex, disability, genetic information, sexual orientation, gender identity, or any other classification
that deprives the person of consideration as an individual), the complaint should be brought to the Office of Equal Opportunity
and Diversity.
(1) counsel the complainant as to the options available under this policy and, at the complainant's request, will help the
complainant resolve the complaint informally and/or refer the complainant to the appropriate office as described below
in II-14.6a so that the complainant may bring a formal complaint; and
(2) take appropriate interim action, which may include those actions described below in II-14.10, to address the alleged
behavior and protect the health or safety of the alleged victim, complainant, and/or witnesses.
(1) The Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity will assist in determining whether there is a potential policy
(2) For situations involving faculty and/or staff, the Behavior Risk Management team is available to assist with
assessing situations, planning the actions needed, and carrying out those actions. This team may be accessed by
contacting Faculty and Staff Services, 121-50 University Services Building.
(3) For situations involving students, contact the Dean of Students, 135 Iowa Memorial Union.
d. Substantial weight will be given to the wishes of the alleged victim when determining how to respond to a complaint. When
a complaint is brought informally, the person(s) charged in the complaint will not ordinarily be informed of the complaint
without the consent of the alleged victim unless circumstances require (such as when there are multiple complaints against the
same person or allegations are particularly egregious). No disciplinary action can be taken against a person, and there will be no
record of the allegations in the person's employment or student disciplinary file, unless the person is notified of the allegations
and given an opportunity to respond.
e. Any academic or administrative officer of the University who becomes aware of specific and credible allegations of
harassment based on a protected classification (race, creed, color, national origin, age, sex, disability, genetic information,
sexual orientation, or gender identity), whether through the report of a complainant (including a third party) or otherwise, shall
report the allegations promptly to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity for assistance in evaluating the situation and
determining an appropriate course of action, even if the alleged victim has requested that no action be taken.
If there is a supervisory relationship between the complainant and/or victim and the respondent, the appropriate course of action
will include development of a plan to avoid any perceived or actual conflict of interest until the complaint is resolved.
The initial report may be verbal, but a written report also must be made after the complaint is resolved using the Office of
Equal Opportunity and Diversity Informal Harassment Complaint Resolution form, which requires disclosure of the
employment or student status of the alleged victim(s), the complainant(s) (if other than the alleged victim), and the person(s)
charged; the department(s) with which those persons are affiliated; a summary of the allegations; and a description of the steps
taken to resolve the complaint.
If the person alleged to have engaged in harassment was notified of the existence of the informal complaint and given an
opportunity to respond, the names of the parties must be provided to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity. If the
person was not informed of the allegations or was not given an opportunity to respond, then the names of the parties shall not
be provided to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity.
f. Reasonable efforts will be made to process complaints within 21 days, giving consideration to the nature of the allegations
and the circumstances surrounding the complaint process.
g. It is the responsibility of the academic or administrative officer who facilitates the informal resolution of the complaint to
monitor compliance with the terms of the informal resolution. Sanctions up to and including termination of employment or
separation from the University may be imposed in the event that an individual fails to comply with the terms of the informal
resolution.
[top]
a. A formal complaint pursuant to this policy must be brought to one of the following offices for investigation depending upon
the status of the respondent and the nature of the allegations:
(1) Protected class harassment. If the complaint alleges harassment based on a classification covered by II-3 Human
Rights (race, creed, color, national origin, age, sex, disability, genetic information, sexual orientation, gender identity,
or any other classification that deprives the person of consideration as an individual), a formal complaint should be
brought to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity regardless of the status of the respondent.
(2) Other harassment. If the complaint alleges harassment that is not based on a classification covered by the II-3
Human Rights (race, creed, color, national origin, age, sex, disability, genetic information, sexual orientation, gender
identity, or any other classification that deprives the person of consideration as an individual), a person should bring a
formal complaint to one of the following offices depending on the status of the respondent:
(a) Faculty or instructor. If the respondent is a faculty member, teaching assistant, or other instructor, a formal
complaint should be brought to the respondent's collegiate dean or to the Office of the Provost;
(c) Student. If the respondent is a student, a formal complaint should be brought to the Dean of Students or the
Dean of the Graduate College.
b. A formal complaint may be brought after an informal resolution was not successfully reached, or may be brought
immediately without pursuing informal resolution.
c. The purpose of the investigation is to establish whether there is a reasonable basis for believing that a violation of this policy
has occurred. In conducting the investigation, the investigating office will make reasonable efforts to interview the alleged
victim, the complainant (if other than the alleged victim), and the respondent, and may interview other persons believed to have
pertinent factual knowledge, as well as review any relevant documentary evidence. At all times, the investigating office will
take steps to ensure confidentiality to the extent possible.
d. When a formal complaint is brought, the respondent will be informed of the allegations, the identity of the complainant, and
the facts surrounding the allegations. The investigation will afford the respondent an opportunity to respond to the allegations
and evidence provided by the complainant and/or alleged victim, and to provide a statement of the facts as perceived by the
respondent.
e. At the conclusion of the investigation, the investigating office will issue a written finding which will summarize the evidence
gathered and state whether or not there is a reasonable basis for believing that a violation of this policy has occurred. The
written finding will normally be issued within 45 days of when the complaint was filed. When it is not reasonably possible to
issue the finding within that time, the investigating office will notify the alleged victim and the respondent that the finding will
be delayed and indicate the reasons for the delay. The alleged victim and the respondent will receive a copy of the written
finding, which is to remain confidential as defined below by II-14.12c. Third-party complainants will be notified only that the
proceedings are concluded.
f. If the investigating office finds a reasonable basis for believing that a violation of this policy has occurred, the matter will be
referred to the appropriate administrator for further consideration as outlined in II-14.7 below.
[top]
a. The following administrators will review the finding of the investigating office:
(1) the Office of the Provost, if the respondent is a faculty member or other instructional personnel (except graduate
assistants);
(2) the office of the vice president or dean responsible for the unit employing the person charged, if the respondent is a
staff member (including a graduate assistant, in which case the Dean of the Graduate College also must be notified in
order to determine whether ramifications apply for the student's academic progress);
(3) the Dean of Students, if the respondent is a student (including a graduate student, in which case the Dean of the
Graduate College also must be notified in order to determine whether ramifications apply for the student's academic
progress);
(1) accept all or any part of the findings of the investigating office;
(2) not accept all or any part of the findings of the investigating office;
c. Violations of this Anti-Harassment Policy may lead to disciplinary sanctions up to and including termination or separation
from the University. Sanctions for violations of this policy should be commensurate with the nature of the violation and the
respondent's disciplinary history.
d. In addition to other disciplinary action, persons who are found to have violated this policy may be referred to the Behavior
When the respondent is a faculty or staff member, the Office of Faculty and Staff Services, 121-50 University Service
Building, is available to assist with locating appropriate resources. When the respondent is a student, University Counseling
Service, 3223 Westlawn, is available to assist with locating appropriate resources.
e. It is the responsibility of the appropriate administrator to follow-up with the parties at a reasonable interval(s) to assess their
compliance with the disciplinary and/or remedial sanctions imposed. More serious sanctions, up to and including termination of
employment or separation from the University, may be imposed in the event that the individual fails to comply with the
sanctions initially imposed.
[top]
a. faculty members will be governed by the Faculty Dispute Procedures (III-29) and that portion of those procedures dealing
with faculty ethics (III-29.7).
b. staff members will be governed by applicable University policies, including III-16 Ethics and Responsibility Statement for
Staff and the applicable discipline and/or grievance procedures (III-28 Conflict Management Resources for University Staff
and/or relevant collective bargaining agreement);
c. graduate assistants, when dismissal is sought, will be governed by the procedure for dismissal of graduate assistants (III-
12.4). When disciplinary action other than dismissal is taken by the dean of the employing college, a graduate assistant may
appeal through any existing contractual grievance procedures;
a. Isolated behavior of the kind described in II-14.2, which does not rise to the level of harassment but which if repeated could
rise to that level, demonstrates insensitivity that may warrant remedial measures. Academic or administrative officers who
become aware of such behavior in their areas should counsel those who have engaged in the behavior. Such counsel should
include a clear statement that the behavior is not acceptable and should cease, information about the potential consequences if
such behavior persists, and a recommendation, as appropriate, to undertake an educational program designed to help the
person(s) understand the harm caused by the behavior.
b. After such counseling occurs, if a person continues to engage in the conduct described in II-14.9a, he or she may be deemed
to have engaged in harassment.
[top]
a. Alleged victims will be informed of relevant procedural steps taken during the investigation and any interim protective
measures taken. An alleged victim may be accompanied by a victim advocate and other support persons during the
investigation process if the alleged victim so desires.
b. Throughout the investigation and resolution of a complaint, steps will be taken to protect alleged victims, complainants,
witnesses, and others from harm caused by continuation of the alleged harassing behavior.
c. Retaliation against alleged victims, complainants, and/or witnesses who provide information during an investigation pursuant
to this policy is prohibited by II-11 Anti-Retaliation. Reasonable action will be taken to assure that alleged victims,
complainants, and/or witnesses suffer no retaliation as a result of their activities with regard to the process.
d. Steps that may be taken to protect alleged victims, complainants, witnesses, and others from continued harassment and/or
(1) lateral transfers of one or more of the parties in an employment setting and a comparable move if a classroom setting
is involved, and
(2) arrangement that academic and/or employment evaluations concerning complainants or others be made by an
appropriate individual other than the respondent.
e. Any retaliation against alleged victims, complainants or witnesses should be reported pursuant to the Anti-Retaliation Policy
(II-11). Retaliation may result in disciplinary action against the person committing the retaliatory act(s).
f. In extraordinary circumstances, the Provost, a dean, a DEO, or any vice president may, at any time during or after an
investigation of allegations of harassment, suspend or partially restrict from employment any employee accused of harassment
if the Provost, dean, DEO, or vice president finds that it is reasonably certain that:
(2) serious and immediate harm will ensue if the person continues his or her employment. Similarly, if the respondent is
a student, interim sanctions may be imposed pursuant to Section 10 of the Student Judicial Procedure.
[top]
a. This policy shall not be used to bring knowingly false or malicious allegations of harassment. Making such allegations may
subject the complaining party to remedial and/or disciplinary action up to and including termination or separation from the
University. Any such disciplinary action will be initiated by the appropriate administrator overseeing the complainant(s).
b. In the event the allegations are not substantiated, reasonable steps will be taken to restore the reputation of the respondent if
it was damaged by the proceeding. The respondent may consult with the investigating office regarding reasonable steps to
address such concerns.
[top]
14.12 CONFIDENTIALITY.
a. In order to empower community members to voice concerns and bring complaints, the confidentiality of all parties will be
protected to the greatest extent possible. However, confidentiality cannot be guaranteed in all cases, and legal obligations may
require the University to take some action once it is made aware that harassment may be occurring, even when the alleged
victim is reluctant to proceed. Appropriate University officials will be consulted, including the Office of Equal Opportunity
and Diversity when the complaint alleges harassment based on a protected classification (see II-14.5e above), and information
will be shared only with those individuals who need to know it to implement this policy.
b. Alleged victims, third-party complainants, and respondents are expected to maintain confidentiality as well. They are not
prohibited from discussing the situation outside of the work or educational environment. However, the matter should not be
discussed in the work or educational environment.
c. Dissemination of documents relating to complaints of harassment and/or to the investigation of such complaints, other than
as necessary to pursue an appeal, grievance, or other legal or administrative proceeding, is prohibited.
d. Failure to maintain confidentiality by a respondent may be considered to be a form of retaliation in violation of II-14.10c of
this policy. Failure to maintain confidentiality by any party (alleged victim, third-party complainant, or respondent) may result
in disciplinary action.
[top]
Go forward one step to II-18 Conflicts of Commitment and Interest (Chapters 15-17 are reserved for future use.)
Or return to the Operations Manual Table of Contents, Index, or Search
Page last updated June 2012 by Office of the Senior Vice President for Finance and Operations
14.1 Rationale
14.2 Policy
14.3 Scope of Policy
14.4 Bringing a Complaint
14.5 Informal Resolution of Complaints
14.6 Investigation of Formal Complaints
14.7 Process for Disciplinary Action
14.8 Applicable Procedures
14.9 Isolated Behavior
14.10 Protection of Alleged Victims, Complainants, and Others
14.11 Protection of the Respondent
14.12 Confidentiality
14.1 RATIONALE.
The purpose of this policy is to prevent harassment within The University of Iowa community and to provide a
process for addressing all forms of harassment if and when it does occur. The University of Iowa is committed to
maintaining an environment that recognizes the inherent worth and dignity of every person, and that fosters
tolerance, sensitivity, understanding, and mutual respect. This commitment requires that the highest value be
placed on the use of reason and that any harassment in the University community be renounced as repugnant and
inimical to its goals. Harassment destroys the mutual trust which binds members of the community in their
pursuit of truth.
The University also is committed strongly to academic freedom and free speech. An educational institution has a
duty to provide a forum in which free speech and differences of opinion are actively encouraged and facilitated,
and where opinions and deeply held beliefs are challenged and debated. Critical to this mission is providing a
nondiscriminatory environment that is conducive to learning. Respect for these rights requires that members of
the University community tolerate expressions of opinion that differ from their own or that they may find
abhorrent.
This policy addresses harassment in all forms based on any classification covered by law and/or II-3 Human
Rights (with the exception of sexual harassment, which is addressed in II-4 Sexual Harassment) and IV-2 Sexual
Misconduct Involving Students, as well as harassment based on other factors as set forth in this policy.
[top]
14.2 POLICY.
Harassment of any member of the University community is prohibited.
b. Definition of harassment as it relates to the content of speech. When an allegation of harassment rests
upon the content of oral, written, or symbolic speech, it falls within this definition only if 1) the content
consists of those personally abusive epithets which are inherently likely to provoke a violent reaction, 2)
the content is a serious expression of an intent to commit an act of unlawful violence to a particular
individual or group of individuals, or 3) the content is a threat to a person or group of persons with the
intent of placing the victim in fear of bodily harm or death. Conduct that constitutes a protected exercise of
an individual's rights under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution (and related principles
of academic freedom) shall not be deemed a violation of this policy. Note: Sexual harassment is addressed
by the University's Policy on Sexual Harassment (II-4) and/or the University's Policy on Sexual
Misconduct Involving Students (IV-2).
c. Evidence of harassment. Behavior that may constitute, or be evidence of, prohibited harassment
includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(1) repeated contact with another in person, by telephone, in writing, or through electronic means
(see also II-19 Acceptable Use of Information Technology Resources), after the recipient has made
clear that such contact is unwelcome.
(2) physical, visual, or verbal behavior directed toward another person or an identifiable group of
persons that is intended to be or is reasonably likely to be interpreted as threatening or intimidating.
Behavior that constitutes speech is included within this section only to the extent to which it has a
direct tendency to incite an immediate violent reaction in a reasonable person or to place a
reasonable person in fear of imminent physical harm.
(3) harassment proscribed by the Iowa Criminal Code, Chapter 708, including, for example, stalking,
the placement of simulated explosives, ordering merchandise or services with intent to annoy, or
false reports to police.
(4) stalking as a course of conduct that is directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable
person to feel fear.
d. Academic freedom. All proceedings under this section shall respect the principles of academic freedom
stated in the Statement on Tenure and Academic Vitality at The University of Iowa (III-10.1a(2)), which
commits the University to the principle that "free inquiry and expression are essential to the maintenance of
excellence."
e. Penalty enhancement. The University reserves the right to impose more severe sanctions on individuals
whose actions in violation of this policy are motivated by race, creed, color, national origin, age, sex,
disability, genetic information, sexual orientation, gender identity, or veteran status of the victim.
f. In determining whether alleged conduct constitutes prohibited harassment, the investigator will consider
all available information and will review the totality of circumstances, including the context in which the
alleged incident(s) occurred. Although repeated incidents generally create a stronger claim of harassment, a
single serious incident can be sufficient. Determinations will be made on a case-by-case basis.
(b) Faculty members with administrative responsibilities at the level of departmental executive
officer (DEO) or above,
Doyle Appx. 509 STATE 756
126 www.uiowa.edu/~our/opmanual • 1 July 2014
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 510 of 533
(c) Any staff member whose primary job responsibility is to provide advice regarding a
student's academic pursuits or other University-related activities,
(e) The President, Director of Equal Opportunity and Diversity, vice presidents (including
assistant and associate vice presidents), and Provost (including assistant and associate
provosts), and those persons' designees,
(f) Directors and supervisors in an employment context, including faculty and staff who
supervise student employees, in relation to matters involving the employees they supervise
(other than Department of Public Safety personnel when receiving criminal complaints or
reports), and
(3) Complainant: the person who brings a complaint of violation of this policy, who could be an
alleged victim, a third party, or an academic or administrative officer of the University.
(4) Graduate assistant: a graduate student employed by the University as a research assistant or
teaching assistant.
(5) Human resources representative: the individual designated as a unit's departmental authority on
human resource policies and procedures, and all central human resources staff.
(7) Member of the University community: any University student, or faculty or staff member.
(10) Specific and credible allegations: allegations that provide factual details such as, but not limited
to, time, place, actions, participants, and witnesses. Allegations do not necessarily have to be based
on firsthand observation of events to be "specific and credible," but direct observation normally
results in greater specificity and credibility than indirect knowledge.
(11) Supervisor: a person who has authority either: 1) to undertake or recommend tangible
employment decisions (those that significantly change an employee's employment status, such as,
but not limited to, hiring, firing, promoting, demoting, reviewing performance, reassigning, and
compensation decisions) affecting an employee, or 2) to direct the employee's daily work activities.
(12) Third-party complainant: a person who brings a complaint alleging that someone else has been
harassed.
(c) Monitoring online activities, surveillance and other types of observation, whether by
physical proximity or electronic means, attempts to gather information about the complainant;
(e) Direct physical and/or verbal threats against a complainant or a complainant's loved ones,
including animal abuse;
(f) Gathering of information about a complainant from family, friends, co-workers, and/or
classmates;
(g) Manipulative and controlling behaviors such as threats to harm oneself, or threats to harm
someone close to the complainant;
(h) Defamation or slander against the complainant, posting false information about the
complainant and/or posing as the complainant to post to websites, newsgroups, blogs, or other
sites that allow public contributions, encouraging others to harass the complainant;
(i) Posing as someone other than oneself to initiate transactions, financial credit, loans, or
other contractual agreements;
a. Acts by employees and students. The University's prohibition of harassment as defined by II-14.2 above
applies to acts of faculty, other instructors, staff, or students occurring in one or more of the following
circumstances:
(2) at any location, including through electronic media such as e-mail or social networking websites,
and involving any University faculty, staff, or students, provided that:
(b) The accused or the complainant was acting in an official capacity for the University during
the incident;
(c) The accused or the complainant was conducting University business during the incident;
(d) The conduct has the purpose or reasonably foreseeable effect of substantially interfering
with the work or educational performance of UI students, faculty, or staff;
(e) The conduct creates an intimidating or hostile environment for anyone who is involved in
or seeks to participate in University employment, education, on-campus living, or other
University-sponsored activities; or
(f) The conduct demonstrates that the individual poses a reasonable threat to campus safety
and security. Doyle Appx. 511 STATE 758
128 www.uiowa.edu/~our/opmanual • 1 July 2014
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 512 of 533
b. Acts by persons other than employees or students. The University will make reasonable efforts to
address harassment of its faculty, other instructors, staff, or students by persons participating in University-
related programs or activities, conducting business with or visiting the University, even if such persons are
not directly affiliated with the University. Reports of harassment by visitors to campus and other persons
not directly affiliated with the University should be made to an academic or administrative officer or the
Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity.
[top]
a. Individuals who believe they have experienced harassment are encouraged to report it, even if they are
not certain whether a violation of this policy has occurred. Reports of protected class harassment (see II-3
Human Rights) should be brought to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity under this policy.
Reports also may be directed separately to other offices under applicable policies and procedures as
follows:
(1) Complaints that a student violated the rights of any member of the University community may be
investigated under a process initiated by the Dean of Students (such as, but not limited to, the Code
of Student Life;
(2) Complaints that a faculty member violated the rights of any member of the University
community may be investigated under a process initiated by the Provost (such as, but not limited to,
III-15 Professional Ethics and Academic Responsibility);
(3) Complaints that a staff member violated the rights of any member of the University community
may be investigated under a process initiated by the Senior Human Resources Leadership
Representative for the staff member's unit (such as, but not limited to, III-16 Ethics and
Responsibilities for University of Iowa Staff.
b. A complaint that this policy has been violated may be brought through informal or formal channels by
any member of the University community, including a third party, or by the University itself. A complaint
must state specific and credible allegations of harassment to warrant an investigation. There is no time
limit for bringing a complaint; however, it may be difficult to substantiate the allegations if they are made
after significant time has passed. Therefore, prompt reporting of complaints is strongly encouraged.
c. Substantial weight will be given to the wishes of the alleged victim when determining how to respond to
a complaint. However, the University may investigate the allegations even without the alleged victim's
consent, if circumstances warrant (such as when there are multiple complaints of harassment involving the
same person or allegations are particularly egregious).
d. Anyone (victims or others) who wishes to consult with someone about a specific situation without
making a complaint, or who wishes simply to learn more about enforcement of this Anti-Harassment
Policy may contact any of the following offices or organizations:
(2) Faculty and Staff Services/Employee Assistance Program (for faculty or staff)
(4) Women's Resource and Action Center (for faculty, staff, or students)
These offices are exempt from the reporting requirements set forth below in II-14.5e. In addition, staff in
these offices and organizations generally have professional or legal obligations to keep communications
with their clients confidential. Faculty and staff in other University offices typically do not have
confidentiality obligations and may be required to report allegations as described below in II-14.5e.
[top]
Doyle Appx. 512 STATE 759
1 July 2014 • www.uiowa.edu/~our/opmanual 129
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 513 of 533
a. A complaint may be brought informally to any academic or administrative officer of the University (as
defined above in II-14.2g(1)). If the complaint alleges harassment based on a protected classification as
defined by II-3 Human Rights (race, creed, color, national origin, age, sex, disability, genetic information,
sexual orientation, gender identity, or any other classification that deprives the person of consideration as
an individual), the complaint should be brought to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity.
(1) counsel the complainant as to the options available under this policy and, at the complainant's
request, will help the complainant resolve the complaint informally and/or refer the complainant to
the appropriate office as described below in II-14.6a so that the complainant may bring a formal
complaint; and
(2) take appropriate interim action, which may include those actions described below in II-14.10, to
address the alleged behavior and protect the health or safety of the alleged victim, complainant,
and/or witnesses.
(1) The Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity will assist in determining whether there is a
potential policy violation related to a protected classification, and whether reporting pursuant to
paragraph e below is required.
(2) For situations involving faculty and/or staff, the Behavior Risk Management team is available to
assist with assessing situations, planning the actions needed, and carrying out those actions. This
team may be accessed by contacting Faculty and Staff Services, 121-50 University Services
Building.
(3) For situations involving students, contact the Dean of Students, 135 Iowa Memorial Union.
d. Substantial weight will be given to the wishes of the alleged victim when determining how to respond to
a complaint. When a complaint is brought informally, the person(s) charged in the complaint will not
ordinarily be informed of the complaint without the consent of the alleged victim unless circumstances
require (such as when there are multiple complaints against the same person or allegations are particularly
egregious). No disciplinary action can be taken against a person, and there will be no record of the
allegations in the person's employment or student disciplinary file, unless the person is notified of the
allegations and given an opportunity to respond.
e. Any academic or administrative officer of the University who becomes aware of specific and credible
allegations of harassment based on a protected classification (race, creed, color, national origin, age, sex,
disability, genetic information, sexual orientation, or gender identity), whether through the report of a
complainant (including a third party) or otherwise, shall report the allegations promptly to the Office of
Equal Opportunity and Diversity for assistance in evaluating the situation and determining an appropriate
course of action, even if the alleged victim has requested that no action be taken.
If there is a supervisory relationship between the complainant and/or victim and the respondent, the
appropriate course of action will include development of a plan to avoid any perceived or actual conflict of
interest until the complaint is resolved.
The initial report may be verbal, but a written report also must be made after the complaint is resolved
using the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity Informal Harassment Complaint Resolution form,
which requires disclosure of the employment or student status of the alleged victim(s), the complainant(s)
(if other than the alleged victim), and the person(s) charged; the department(s) with which those persons
Doyle and
are affiliated; a summary of the allegations; Appx. 513 of the steps taken toSTATE
a description 760
resolve the complaint.
130 www.uiowa.edu/~our/opmanual • 1 July 2014
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 514 of 533
If the person alleged to have engaged in harassment was notified of the existence of the informal complaint
and given an opportunity to respond, the names of the parties must be provided to the Office of Equal
Opportunity and Diversity. If the person was not informed of the allegations or was not given an
opportunity to respond, then the names of the parties shall not be provided to the Office of Equal
Opportunity and Diversity.
f. Reasonable efforts will be made to process complaints within 21 days, giving consideration to the nature
of the allegations and the circumstances surrounding the complaint process.
g. It is the responsibility of the academic or administrative officer who facilitates the informal resolution of
the complaint to monitor compliance with the terms of the informal resolution. Sanctions up to and
including termination of employment or separation from the University may be imposed in the event that
an individual fails to comply with the terms of the informal resolution.
[top]
a. A formal complaint pursuant to this policy must be brought to one of the following offices for
investigation depending upon the status of the respondent and the nature of the allegations:
(1) Protected class harassment. If the complaint alleges harassment based on a classification covered
by II-3 Human Rights (race, creed, color, national origin, age, sex, disability, genetic information,
sexual orientation, gender identity, or any other classification that deprives the person of
consideration as an individual), a formal complaint should be brought to the Office of Equal
Opportunity and Diversity regardless of the status of the respondent.
(2) Other harassment. If the complaint alleges harassment that is not based on a classification
covered by the II-3 Human Rights (race, creed, color, national origin, age, sex, disability, genetic
information, sexual orientation, gender identity, or any other classification that deprives the person
of consideration as an individual), a person should bring a formal complaint to one of the following
offices depending on the status of the respondent:
(a) Faculty or instructor. If the respondent is a faculty member, teaching assistant, or other
instructor, a formal complaint should be brought to the respondent's collegiate dean or to the
Office of the Provost;
(c) Student. If the respondent is a student, a formal complaint should be brought to the Dean of
Students or the Dean of the Graduate College.
b. A formal complaint may be brought after an informal resolution was not successfully reached, or may be
brought immediately without pursuing informal resolution.
c. The purpose of the investigation is to establish whether there is a reasonable basis for believing that a
violation of this policy has occurred. In conducting the investigation, the investigating office will make
reasonable efforts to interview the alleged victim, the complainant (if other than the alleged victim), and
the respondent, and may interview other persons believed to have pertinent factual knowledge, as well as
review any relevant documentary evidence. At all times, the investigating office will take steps to ensure
confidentiality to the extent possible.
d. When a formal complaint is brought, the respondent will be informed of the allegations, the identity of
Doylethe
the complainant, and the facts surrounding Appx. 514 The investigation willSTATE
allegations. afford the761
respondent an
1 July 2014 • www.uiowa.edu/~our/opmanual 131
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 515 of 533
opportunity to respond to the allegations and evidence provided by the complainant and/or alleged victim,
and to provide a statement of the facts as perceived by the respondent.
e. At the conclusion of the investigation, the investigating office will issue a written finding which will
summarize the evidence gathered and state whether or not there is a reasonable basis for believing that a
violation of this policy has occurred. The written finding will normally be issued within 45 days of when
the complaint was filed. When it is not reasonably possible to issue the finding within that time, the
investigating office will notify the alleged victim and the respondent that the finding will be delayed and
indicate the reasons for the delay. The alleged victim and the respondent will receive a copy of the written
finding, which is to remain confidential as defined below by II-14.12c. Third-party complainants will be
notified only that the proceedings are concluded.
f. If the investigating office finds a reasonable basis for believing that a violation of this policy has
occurred, the matter will be referred to the appropriate administrator for further consideration as outlined in
II-14.7 below.
[top]
a. The following administrators will review the finding of the investigating office:
(1) the Office of the Provost, if the respondent is a faculty member or other instructional personnel
(except graduate assistants);
(2) the office of the vice president or dean responsible for the unit employing the person charged, if
the respondent is a staff member (including a graduate assistant, in which case the Dean of the
Graduate College also must be notified in order to determine whether ramifications apply for the
student's academic progress);
(3) the Dean of Students, if the respondent is a student (including a graduate student, in which case
the Dean of the Graduate College also must be notified in order to determine whether ramifications
apply for the student's academic progress);
(1) accept all or any part of the findings of the investigating office;
(2) not accept all or any part of the findings of the investigating office;
c. Violations of this Anti-Harassment Policy may lead to disciplinary sanctions up to and including
termination or separation from the University. Sanctions for violations of this policy should be
commensurate with the nature of the violation and the respondent's disciplinary history.
d. In addition to other disciplinary action, persons who are found to have violated this policy may be
referred to the Behavior Risk Management team or to the Dean of Students for consideration of a mandated
referral or be required to participate in policy and behavioral expectations education. They also may be
required to complete community service, enroll in a specific academic course, attend an educational
workshop, and/or make restitution for economic damages caused by their behavior.
When the respondent is a faculty or staff member, the Office of Faculty and Staff Services, 121-50
University Service Building, is available to assist with locating appropriate resources. When the respondent
is a student, University Counseling Service, 3223 Westlawn, is available to assist with locating appropriate
resources. Doyle Appx. 515 STATE 762
132 www.uiowa.edu/~our/opmanual • 1 July 2014
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 516 of 533
e. It is the responsibility of the appropriate administrator to follow-up with the parties at a reasonable
interval(s) to assess their compliance with the disciplinary and/or remedial sanctions imposed. More
serious sanctions, up to and including termination of employment or separation from the University, may
be imposed in the event that the individual fails to comply with the sanctions initially imposed.
[top]
a. faculty members will be governed by the Faculty Dispute Procedures (III-29) and that portion of those
procedures dealing with faculty ethics (III-29.7).
b. staff members will be governed by applicable University policies, including III-16 Ethics and
Responsibility Statement for Staff and the applicable discipline and/or grievance procedures (III-28
Conflict Management Resources for University Staff and/or relevant collective bargaining agreement);
c. graduate assistants, when dismissal is sought, will be governed by the procedure for dismissal of
graduate assistants (III-12.4). When disciplinary action other than dismissal is taken by the dean of the
employing college, a graduate assistant may appeal through any existing contractual grievance procedures;
a. Isolated behavior of the kind described in II-14.2, which does not rise to the level of harassment but
which if repeated could rise to that level, demonstrates insensitivity that may warrant remedial measures.
Academic or administrative officers who become aware of such behavior in their areas should counsel
those who have engaged in the behavior. Such counsel should include a clear statement that the behavior is
not acceptable and should cease, information about the potential consequences if such behavior persists,
and a recommendation, as appropriate, to undertake an educational program designed to help the person(s)
understand the harm caused by the behavior.
b. After such counseling occurs, if a person continues to engage in the conduct described in II-14.9a, he or
she may be deemed to have engaged in harassment.
[top]
a. Alleged victims will be informed of relevant procedural steps taken during the investigation and any
interim protective measures taken. An alleged victim may be accompanied by a victim advocate and other
support persons during the investigation process if the alleged victim so desires.
b. Throughout the investigation and resolution of a complaint, steps will be taken to protect alleged
victims, complainants, witnesses, and others from harm caused by continuation of the alleged harassing
behavior.
c. Retaliation against alleged victims, complainants, and/or witnesses who provide information during an
investigation pursuant to this policy is prohibited by II-11 Anti-Retaliation. Reasonable action will be
taken to assure that alleged victims, complainants, and/or witnesses suffer no retaliation as a result of their
activities with regard to the process.Doyle Appx. 516 STATE 763
1 July 2014 • www.uiowa.edu/~our/opmanual 133
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 517 of 533
d. Steps that may be taken to protect alleged victims, complainants, witnesses, and others from continued
harassment and/or retaliation might include:
(1) lateral transfers of one or more of the parties in an employment setting and a comparable move if
a classroom setting is involved, and
(2) arrangement that academic and/or employment evaluations concerning complainants or others be
made by an appropriate individual other than the respondent.
e. Any retaliation against alleged victims, complainants or witnesses should be reported pursuant to the
Anti-Retaliation Policy (II-11). Retaliation may result in disciplinary action against the person committing
the retaliatory act(s).
f. In extraordinary circumstances, the Provost, a dean, a DEO, or any vice president may, at any time
during or after an investigation of allegations of harassment, suspend or partially restrict from employment
any employee accused of harassment if the Provost, dean, DEO, or vice president finds that it is reasonably
certain that:
(2) serious and immediate harm will ensue if the person continues his or her employment. Similarly,
if the respondent is a student, interim sanctions may be imposed pursuant to Section 10 of the
Student Judicial Procedure.
[top]
a. This policy shall not be used to bring knowingly false or malicious allegations of harassment. Making
such allegations may subject the complaining party to remedial and/or disciplinary action up to and
including termination or separation from the University. Any such disciplinary action will be initiated by
the appropriate administrator overseeing the complainant(s).
b. In the event the allegations are not substantiated, reasonable steps will be taken to restore the reputation
of the respondent if it was damaged by the proceeding. The respondent may consult with the investigating
office regarding reasonable steps to address such concerns.
[top]
14.12 CONFIDENTIALITY.
a. In order to empower community members to voice concerns and bring complaints, the confidentiality of
all parties will be protected to the greatest extent possible. However, confidentiality cannot be guaranteed
in all cases, and legal obligations may require the University to take some action once it is made aware that
harassment may be occurring, even when the alleged victim is reluctant to proceed. Appropriate University
officials will be consulted, including the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity when the complaint
alleges harassment based on a protected classification (see II-14.5e above), and information will be shared
only with those individuals who need to know it to implement this policy.
b. Alleged victims, third-party complainants, and respondents are expected to maintain confidentiality as
well. They are not prohibited from discussing the situation outside of the work or educational environment.
However, the matter should not be discussed in the work or educational environment.
Page last updated June 2014 by Office of the Senior Vice President for Finance and Operations
14.1 Rationale
(Amended 7/15)
The purpose of this policy is to prevent harassment within The University of Iowa community and to provide a process for addressing all forms of harassment if and when it occurs. The
University of Iowa is committed to maintaining an environment that recognizes the inherent worth and dignity of every person, and that fosters tolerance, sensitivity, understanding, and
mutual respect. This commitment requires that the highest value be placed on the use of reason and that any harassment in the University community be renounced as repugnant and
inimical to its goals. Harassment destroys the mutual trust that binds members of the community in their pursuit of truth.
The University also is committed strongly to academic freedom and free speech. An educational institution has a duty to provide a forum in which free speech and differences of opinion
are actively encouraged and facilitated, and where opinions and deeply held beliefs are challenged and debated. Critical to this mission is providing a nondiscriminatory environment that
is conducive to learning. Respect for these rights requires that members of the University community tolerate expressions of opinion that differ from their own or that they may find
abhorrent.
This policy addresses harassment in all forms based on any classification covered by law and/or II-3 Human Rights (with the exception of sexual harassment, which is addressed in II-4
Sexual Harassment) and IV-2 Sexual Misconduct, Dating/Domestic Violence, or Stalking Involving Students, as well as harassment based on other factors as set forth in this policy.
14.2 Policy
(Amended 5/15; 7/15)
a. Definition of harassment as it relates to conduct. "Harassment" means intentional conduct directed toward an identifiable person or persons that is sufficiently severe, pervasive,
or persistent that it interferes with work, educational performance, on-campus living, or participation in a University activity on or off campus.
b. Definition of harassment as it relates to the content of speech. When an allegation of harassment rests upon the content of oral, written, or symbolic speech, it falls within this
definition only if 1) the content consists of those personally abusive epithets which are inherently likely to provoke a violent reaction, 2) the content is a serious expression of an
intent to commit an act of unlawful violence to a particular individual or group of individuals, or 3) the content is a threat to a person or group of persons with the intent of placing
the victim in fear of bodily harm or death. Conduct that constitutes a protected exercise of an individual's rights under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution (and
related principles of academic freedom) shall not be deemed a violation of this policy. Note: Sexual harassment is addressed by the University's Policy on Sexual Harassment
(II-4) and/or the University's Policy on Sexual Misconduct Involving Students (IV-2).
c. Evidence of harassment. Behavior that may constitute, or be evidence of, prohibited harassment includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(1) repeated contact with another in person, by telephone, in writing, or through electronic means (see also II-19 Acceptable Use of Information Technology
Resources), after the recipient has made clear that such contact is unwelcome.
(2) physical, visual, or verbal behavior directed toward another person or an identifiable group of persons that is intended to be or is reasonably likely to be interpreted
as threatening or intimidating. Behavior that constitutes speech is included within this section only to the extent to which it has a direct tendency to incite an immediate
violent reaction in a reasonable person or to place a reasonable person in fear of imminent physical harm.
(3) harassment proscribed by the Iowa Criminal Code, Chapter 708, including, for example, stalking, the placement of simulated explosives, ordering merchandise or
services with intent to annoy, or false reports to police.
(4) stalking as a course of conduct that is directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to feel fear.
(5) domestic/dating violence which is coercive, abusive, and/or threatening behavior toward a current or former intimate or romantic partner.
d. Academic freedom. All proceedings under this section shall respect the principles of academic freedom stated in the Statement on Tenure and Academic Vitality at The
University of Iowa (III-10.1a(2)), which commits the University to the principle that "free inquiry and expression are essential to the maintenance of excellence."
e. Penalty enhancement. The University reserves the right to impose more severe sanctions on individuals whose actions in violation of this policy are motivated by the race,
creed, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, pregnancy, disability, genetic information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military, sexual orientation, gender identity,
or associational preferences of the victim.
f. In determining whether alleged conduct constitutes prohibited harassment, the investigator will consider all available information and will review the totality of circumstances,
including the context in which the alleged incident(s) occurred. Although repeated incidents generally create a stronger claim of harassment, a single serious incident can be
sufficient. Determinations will be made on a case-by-case basis.
(b) Faculty members with administrative responsibilities at the level of departmental executive officer (DEO) or above,
(c) Any staff member whose primary job responsibility is to provide advice regarding a student's academic pursuits or other University-related activities,
(d) A faculty member serving as departmental (or collegiate) director or coordinator of undergraduate or graduate studies, or as a director or coordinator of
any departmental, collegiate, or University off-campus academic program (including any study-abroad program),
(e) The President, Director of Equal Opportunity and Diversity, vice presidents (including assistant and associate vice presidents), and Provost (including
(f) Directors and supervisors in an employment context, including faculty and staff who supervise student employees, in relation to matters involving the
employees they supervise (other than Department of Public Safety personnel when receiving criminal complaints or reports), and
(3) Complainant: the person who brings a complaint of violation of this policy, who could be an alleged victim, a third party, or an academic or administrative officer of
the University.
(4) Domestic/dating violence: any coercive, abusive, and/or threatening behavior toward a current or former intimate or romantic partner. These behaviors may
include, for example, physical, sexual, emotional, economic, or psychological actions or threats of actions that intimidate, manipulate, humiliate, isolate, frighten,
terrorize, coerce, threaten, or injure the victim/survivor.
(5) Graduate assistant: a graduate student employed by the University as a research assistant or teaching assistant.
(6) Human resources representative: the individual designated as a unit's departmental authority on human resource policies and procedures, and all central human
resources staff.
(7) Instructor: a person engaged in teaching students or in evaluation or supervision, direct or indirect, of a student's academic work.
(8) Member of the University community: any University student, or faculty or staff member.
(9) Protected interests: University employment, education, on-campus living, or participation in a University activity.
(11) Specific and credible allegations: allegations that provide factual details such as, but not limited to, time, place, actions, participants, and witnesses. Allegations do
not necessarily have to be based on firsthand observation of events to be "specific and credible," but direct observation normally results in greater specificity and
credibility than indirect knowledge.
(a) Non-consensual communication including in-person communication, telephone calls, voice messages, text messages, email messages, social networking
site postings, instant messages, postings of pictures or information on websites, written letters, gifts, ordering goods or services, or any other communications
that are undesired and/or place another person in fear;
(b) Following, pursuing, waiting, or showing up uninvited at a workplace, place of residence, classroom, or other locations frequented by a complainant;
(c) Monitoring online activities, surveillance and other types of observation, whether by physical proximity or electronic means, attempts to gather information
about the complainant;
(e) Direct physical and/or verbal threats against a complainant or a complainant's loved ones, including animal abuse;
(f) Gathering of information about a complainant from family, friends, co-workers, and/or classmates;
(g) Manipulative and controlling behaviors such as threats to harm oneself, or threats to harm someone close to the complainant;
(h) Defamation or slander against the complainant, posting false information about the complainant and/or posing as the complainant to post to websites,
newsgroups, blogs, or other sites that allow public contributions, encouraging others to harass the complainant;
(i) Posing as someone other than oneself to initiate transactions, financial credit, loans, or other contractual agreements;
(13) Supervisor: a person who has authority either: 1) to undertake or recommend tangible employment decisions (those that significantly change an employee's
employment status, such as, but not limited to, hiring, firing, promoting, demoting, reviewing performance, reassigning, and compensation decisions) affecting an
employee, or 2) to direct the employee's daily work activities.
(14) Third-party complainant: a person who brings a complaint alleging that someone else has been harassed.
(2) at any location, including through electronic media such as email or social networking websites, and involving any University faculty, staff, or students, provided that:
(a) The incident occurs at a University-sponsored activity or during an event sponsored by an organization affiliated with the University, including a student
organization;
(b) The accused or the complainant was acting in an official capacity for the University during the incident;
(c) The accused or the complainant was conducting University business during the incident;
(d) The conduct has the purpose or reasonably foreseeable effect of substantially interfering with the work or educational performance of UI students, faculty,
or staff;
(e) The conduct creates an intimidating or hostile environment for anyone who is involved in or seeks to participate in University employment, education,
on-campus living, or other University-sponsored activities; or
(f) The conduct demonstrates that the individual poses a reasonable threat to campus safety and security.
b. Acts by persons other than employees or students. The University will make reasonable efforts to address harassment of its faculty, other instructors, staff, or students by
persons participating in University-related programs or activities, conducting business with or visiting the University, even if such persons are not directly affiliated with the
University. Reports of harassment by visitors to campus and other persons not directly affiliated with the University should be made to an academic or administrative officer or
the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity (319-335-0705).
(1) Complaints that a student violated the rights of any member of the University community may be investigated under a process initiated by the Dean of Students
(such as, but not limited to, the Code of Student Life;
(2) Complaints that a faculty member violated the rights of any member of the University community may be investigated under a process initiated by the Provost (such
as, but not limited to, III-15 Professional Ethics and Academic Responsibility);
(3) Complaints that a staff member violated the rights of any member of the University community may be investigated under a process initiated by the Senior Human
Resources Leadership Representative for the staff member's unit (such as, but not limited to, III-16 Ethics and Responsibilities for University of Iowa Staff). The Senior
Human Resources Leadership Representative may appoint a designee to conduct the investigation with the approval of University Human Resources and the Office of
Equal Opportunity and Diversity.
b. A complaint that this policy has been violated may be brought through informal or formal channels by any member of the University community, including a third party, or by the
University itself. A complaint must state specific and credible allegations of harassment to warrant an investigation. There is no time limit for bringing a complaint; however, it
may be difficult to substantiate the allegations if they are made after significant time has passed. Therefore, prompt reporting of complaints is strongly encouraged.
c. Substantial weight will be given to the wishes of the alleged victim when determining how to respond to a complaint. However, the University may investigate the allegations
even without the alleged victim's consent, if circumstances warrant (such as when there are multiple complaints of harassment involving the same person or allegations are
particularly egregious).
d. Anyone (victims or others) who wishes to consult with someone about a specific situation without making a complaint, or who wishes simply to learn more about enforcement of
this Anti-Harassment Policy may contact any of the following offices or organizations:
(1) Office of the Ombudsperson (for faculty, staff, or students), C108 Seashore Hall;
(2) Employee Assistance Program (for faculty or staff), 121-50 University Services Building;
(4) Women's Resource and Action Center (for faculty, other instructors, staff, students, or visitors), Bowman House;
(5) Domestic Violence Intervention Program (certified victim advocates) (for faculty, other instructors, staff, students, or visitors), 1105 South Gilbert Court, Iowa City.
These offices are exempt from the reporting requirements set forth below in II-14.5e. In addition, staff in these offices and organizations generally have professional or legal
obligations to keep communications with their clients confidential. Faculty and staff in other University offices typically do not have confidentiality obligations and may be
required to report allegations as described below in II-14.5e.
(1) counsel the complainant as to the options available under this policy and, at the complainant's request, will help the complainant resolve the complaint informally
and/or refer the complainant to the appropriate office as described below in II-14.6a so that the complainant may bring a formal complaint; and
(2) take appropriate interim action, which may include those actions described below in II-14.10, to address the alleged behavior and protect the health or safety of the
alleged victim, complainant, and/or witnesses.
(1) The Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity will assist in determining whether there is a potential policy violation related to a protected classification, and whether
reporting pursuant to paragraph e below is required.
(2) The Threat Assessment Team is available to assist with assessing situations and risk, planning the actions needed, and carrying out those actions. This team may
be accessed by contacting Organizational Effectiveness, 121-50 University Services Building. (See also VI-32 University of Iowa Threat Assessment
Program or http://hr.uiowa.edu/tat.)
(3) For situations involving students, contact the Dean of Students, 135 Iowa Memorial Union.
d. Substantial weight will be given to the wishes of the alleged victim when determining how to respond to a complaint. When a complaint is brought informally, the person(s)
charged in the complaint will not ordinarily be informed of the complaint without the consent of the alleged victim unless circumstances require (such as when there are multiple
complaints against the same person or allegations are particularly egregious). No disciplinary action can be taken against a person, and there will be no record of the allegations
in the person's employment or student disciplinary file, unless the person is notified of the allegations and given an opportunity to respond.
e. Any academic or administrative officer of the University who becomes aware of specific and credible allegations of harassment based on a protected classification (race, creed,
color, religion, national origin, age, sex, pregnancy, disability, genetic information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military, sexual orientation, gender identity,
associational preferences, or any other classification that deprives the person of consideration as an individual), whether through the report of a complainant (including a third
party) or otherwise, shall report the allegations promptly to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity for assistance in evaluating the situation and determining an appropriate
course of action, even if the alleged victim has requested that no action be taken.
If there is a supervisory relationship between the complainant and/or victim and the respondent, the appropriate course of action will include development of a plan to avoid any
perceived or actual conflict of interest until the complaint is resolved.
The initial report may be verbal, but a written report also must be made after the complaint is resolved using the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity Informal Harassment
Complaint Resolution form, which requires disclosure of the employment or student status of the alleged victim(s), the complainant(s) (if other than the alleged victim), and the
person(s) charged; the department(s) with which those persons are affiliated; a summary of the allegations; and a description of the steps taken to resolve the complaint.
If the person alleged to have engaged in harassment was notified of the existence of the informal complaint and given an opportunity to respond, the names of the parties must
be provided to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity. If the person was not informed of the allegations or was not given an opportunity to respond, then the names of the
parties shall not be provided to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity.
f. Reasonable efforts will be made to process complaints within 21 days, giving consideration to the nature of the allegations and the circumstances surrounding the complaint
process.
g. It is the responsibility of the academic or administrative officer who facilitates the informal resolution of the complaint to monitor compliance with the terms of the informal
resolution. Sanctions up to and including termination of employment or separation from the University may be imposed in the event that an individual fails to comply with the
terms of the informal resolution.
(1) Protected class harassment. If the complaint alleges harassment based on a classification covered by II-3 Human Rights (race, creed, color, religion, national origin,
age, sex, pregnancy, disability, genetic information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military, sexual orientation, gender identity, associational preferences,
or any other classification that deprives the person of consideration as an individual), a formal complaint should be brought to the Office of Equal Opportunity and
Diversity (202 Jessup Hall, 319-335-0705) regardless of the status of the respondent.
(2) Other harassment. If the complaint alleges harassment that is not based on a classification covered by II-3 Human Rights (race, creed, color, religion, national
origin, age, sex, pregnancy, disability, genetic information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military, sexual orientation, gender identity, associational
preferences, or any other classification that deprives the person of consideration as an individual), a person should bring a formal complaint to one of the following
offices depending on the status of the respondent:
(a) Faculty or instructor. If the respondent is a faculty member, teaching assistant, or other instructor, a formal complaint should be brought to the respondent's
collegiate dean or to the Office of the Provost (111 Jessup Hall, 319-335-3565);
(b) Staff member. If the respondent is a staff member (organized or non-organized professional and scientific, organized or non-organized merit staff), a
formal complaint should be brought to the Senior Human Resources Leadership Representative for the unit employing the respondent;
(c) Student. If the respondent is a student, a formal complaint should be brought to the Dean of Students (135 Iowa Memorial Union, 319-335-1162) or the
Dean of the Graduate College (201 Gilmore Hall, 319-335-2143).
b. A formal complaint may be brought after an informal resolution was not successfully reached, or may be brought immediately without pursuing informal resolution.
c. The purpose of the investigation is to establish whether there is a reasonable basis for believing that a violation of this policy has occurred. In conducting the investigation, the
investigating office will make reasonable efforts to interview the alleged victim, the complainant (if other than the alleged victim), and the respondent, and may interview other
persons believed to have pertinent factual knowledge, as well as review any relevant documentary evidence. At all times, the investigating office will take steps to ensure
confidentiality to the extent possible.
d. When a formal complaint is brought, the respondent will be informed of the allegations, the identity of the complainant, and the facts surrounding the allegations. The
investigation will afford the respondent an opportunity to respond to the allegations and evidence provided by the complainant and/or alleged victim, and to provide a statement
of the facts as perceived by the respondent.
e. At the conclusion of the investigation, the investigating office will issue a written finding which will summarize the evidence gathered and state whether or not there is a
reasonable basis for believing that a violation of this policy has occurred. The written finding will normally be issued within 45 days of when the complaint was filed. When it is
not reasonably possible to issue the finding within 45 days, the investigating office will notify the alleged victim and the respondent that the finding will be delayed and indicate
the reasons for the delay. The alleged victim and the respondent will receive a copy of the written finding, which is to remain confidential as defined below by II-14.12c.
Third-party complainants will be notified only that the proceedings are concluded.
f. If the investigating office finds a reasonable basis for believing that a violation of this policy has occurred, the matter will be referred to the appropriate administrator for further
consideration as outlined in II-14.7 below.
(1) the Office of the Provost, if the respondent is a faculty member or other instructional personnel (except graduate assistants);
(2) the office of the vice president or dean responsible for the unit employing the person charged, if the respondent is a staff member (including a graduate assistant, in
which case the Dean of the Graduate College also must be notified in order to determine whether ramifications apply for the student's academic progress);
(3) the Dean of Students, if the respondent is a student (including a graduate student, in which case the Dean of the Graduate College also must be notified in order to
determine whether ramifications apply for the student's academic progress);
(1) accept all or any part of the findings of the investigating office;
(2) not accept all or any part of the findings of the investigating office;
c. Violations of this Anti-Harassment Policy may lead to disciplinary sanctions up to and including termination or separation from the University. Sanctions for violations of this
policy should be commensurate with the nature of the violation and the respondent's disciplinary history.
d. In addition to other disciplinary action, persons who are found to have violated this policy may be required to participate in policy and behavioral expectations education. They
also may be required to complete community service, enroll in a specific academic course, attend an educational workshop, and/or make restitution for economic damages
caused by their behavior.
When the respondent is a faculty or staff member, the Employee Assistance Program, 121-50 University Service Building, is available to assist with locating appropriate
resources. When the respondent is a student, University Counseling Service, 3223 Westlawn, is available to assist with locating appropriate resources.
e. It is the responsibility of the appropriate administrator to follow-up with the parties at a reasonable interval(s) to assess their compliance with the disciplinary and/or remedial
sanctions imposed. More serious sanctions, up to and including termination of employment or separation from the University, may be imposed in the event that the individual
fails to comply with the sanctions initially imposed.
a. faculty members will be governed by the Faculty Dispute Procedures (III-29) and that portion of those procedures dealing with faculty ethics (III-29.7).
b. staff members will be governed by applicable University policies, including III-16 Ethics and Responsibility Statement for Staff and the applicable discipline and/or grievance
procedures (III-28 Conflict Management Resources for University Staff and/or relevant collective bargaining agreement);
c. graduate assistants, when dismissal is sought, will be governed by the procedure for dismissal of graduate assistants (III-12.4). When disciplinary action other than dismissal is
taken by the dean of the employing college, a graduate assistant may appeal through any existing contractual grievance procedures;
a. Isolated behavior of the kind described in II-14.2, which does not rise to the level of harassment but which if repeated could rise to that level, demonstrates insensitivity that may
warrant remedial measures. Academic or administrative officers who become aware of such behavior in their areas should counsel those who have engaged in the behavior.
Such counsel should include a clear statement that the behavior is not acceptable and should cease, information about the potential consequences if such behavior persists,
and a recommendation, as appropriate, to undertake an educational program designed to help the person(s) understand the harm caused by the behavior.
b. After such counseling occurs, if a person continues to engage in the conduct described above in paragraph a, he or she may be deemed to have engaged in harassment.
b. Throughout the investigation and resolution of a complaint, steps will be taken to protect alleged victims, complainants, witnesses, and others from harm caused by continuation
of the alleged harassing behavior.
c. Retaliation against alleged victims, complainants, and/or witnesses who provide information during an investigation pursuant to this policy is prohibited by II-11 Anti-Retaliation.
Reasonable action will be taken to assure that alleged victims, complainants, and/or witnesses suffer no retaliation as a result of their activities with regard to the process.
d. Steps that may be taken to protect alleged victims, complainants, witnesses, and others from continued harassment and/or retaliation might include:
(1) lateral transfers of one or more of the parties in an employment setting and a comparable move if a classroom setting is involved, and
(2) arrangement that academic and/or employment evaluations concerning complainants or others be made by an appropriate individual other than the respondent.
e. Any retaliation against alleged victims, complainants or witnesses should be reported pursuant to the Anti-Retaliation Policy (II-11). Retaliation may result in disciplinary action
against the person committing the retaliatory act(s).
f. In extraordinary circumstances, the Provost, a dean, a DEO, or any vice president may, at any time during or after an investigation of allegations of harassment, suspend or
partially restrict from employment any employee accused of harassment if the Provost, dean, DEO, or vice president finds that it is reasonably certain that:
(2) serious and immediate harm will ensue if the person continues his or her employment. Similarly, if the respondent is a student, interim sanctions may be imposed
pursuant to Section 10 of the Student Judicial Procedure.
b. In the event the allegations are not substantiated, reasonable steps will be taken to restore the reputation of the respondent if it was damaged by the proceeding. The
respondent may consult with the investigating office regarding reasonable steps to address such concerns.
14.12 Confidentiality
a. In order to empower community members to voice concerns and bring complaints, the confidentiality of all parties will be protected to the greatest extent possible. However,
confidentiality cannot be guaranteed in all cases, and legal obligations may require the University to take some action once it is made aware that harassment may be occurring,
even when the alleged victim is reluctant to proceed. Appropriate University officials will be consulted, including the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity when the complaint
alleges harassment based on a protected classification (see II-14.5e above), and information will be shared only with those individuals who need to know it to implement this
policy.
b. Alleged victims, third-party complainants, and respondents are expected to maintain confidentiality as well. They are not prohibited from discussing the situation outside of the
work or educational environment. However, the matter should not be discussed in the work or educational environment.
c. Dissemination of documents relating to complaints of harassment and/or to the investigation of such complaints, other than as necessary to pursue an appeal, grievance, or
other legal or administrative proceeding, is prohibited.
d. Failure to maintain confidentiality by a respondent may be considered to be a form of retaliation in violation of II-14.10c of this policy. Failure to maintain confidentiality by any
party (alleged victim, third-party complainant, or respondent) may result in disciplinary action.
14.1 Rationale
(Amended 7/15)
The purpose of this policy is to prevent harassment within The University of Iowa community and to provide a process for addressing all forms of harassment if and when it occurs. The
University of Iowa is committed to maintaining an environment that recognizes the inherent worth and dignity of every person, and that fosters tolerance, sensitivity, understanding, and
mutual respect. This commitment requires that the highest value be placed on the use of reason and that any harassment in the University community be renounced as repugnant and
inimical to its goals. Harassment destroys the mutual trust that binds members of the community in their pursuit of truth.
The University also is committed strongly to academic freedom and free speech. An educational institution has a duty to provide a forum in which free speech and differences of opinion
are actively encouraged and facilitated, and where opinions and deeply held beliefs are challenged and debated. Critical to this mission is providing a nondiscriminatory environment that
is conducive to learning. Respect for these rights requires that members of the University community tolerate expressions of opinion that differ from their own or that they may find
abhorrent.
This policy addresses harassment in all forms based on any classification covered by law and/or II-3 Human Rights (with the exception of sexual harassment, which is addressed in II-4
Sexual Harassment) and IV-2 Sexual Misconduct, Dating/Domestic Violence, or Stalking Involving Students, as well as harassment based on other factors as set forth in this policy.
14.2 Policy
(Amended 5/15; 7/15)
a. Definition of harassment as it relates to conduct. "Harassment" means intentional conduct directed toward an identifiable person or persons that is sufficiently severe, pervasive,
or persistent that it interferes with work, educational performance, on-campus living, or participation in a University activity on or off campus.
b. Definition of harassment as it relates to the content of speech. When an allegation of harassment rests upon the content of oral, written, or symbolic speech, it falls within this
definition only if 1) the content consists of those personally abusive epithets which are inherently likely to provoke a violent reaction, 2) the content is a serious expression of an
intent to commit an act of unlawful violence to a particular individual or group of individuals, or 3) the content is a threat to a person or group of persons with the intent of placing
the victim in fear of bodily harm or death. Conduct that constitutes a protected exercise of an individual's rights under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution (and
related principles of academic freedom) shall not be deemed a violation of this policy. Note: Sexual harassment is addressed by the University's Policy on Sexual Harassment
(II-4) and/or the University's Policy on Sexual Misconduct Involving Students (IV-2).
c. Evidence of harassment. Behavior that may constitute, or be evidence of, prohibited harassment includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(1) repeated contact with another in person, by telephone, in writing, or through electronic means (see also II-19 Acceptable Use of Information Technology
Resources), after the recipient has made clear that such contact is unwelcome.
(2) physical, visual, or verbal behavior directed toward another person or an identifiable group of persons that is intended to be or is reasonably likely to be interpreted
as threatening or intimidating. Behavior that constitutes speech is included within this section only to the extent to which it has a direct tendency to incite an immediate
violent reaction in a reasonable person or to place a reasonable person in fear of imminent physical harm.
(3) harassment proscribed by the Iowa Criminal Code, Chapter 708, including, for example, stalking, the placement of simulated explosives, ordering merchandise or
services with intent to annoy, or false reports to police.
(4) stalking as a course of conduct that is directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to feel fear.
(5) domestic/dating violence which is coercive, abusive, and/or threatening behavior toward a current or former intimate or romantic partner.
d. Academic freedom. All proceedings under this section shall respect the principles of academic freedom stated in the Statement on Tenure and Academic Vitality at The
University of Iowa (III-10.1a(2)), which commits the University to the principle that "free inquiry and expression are essential to the maintenance of excellence."
e. Penalty enhancement. The University reserves the right to impose more severe sanctions on individuals whose actions in violation of this policy are motivated by the race,
creed, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, pregnancy, disability, genetic information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military, sexual orientation, gender identity,
or associational preferences of the victim.
f. In determining whether alleged conduct constitutes prohibited harassment, the investigator will consider all available information and will review the totality of circumstances,
including the context in which the alleged incident(s) occurred. Although repeated incidents generally create a stronger claim of harassment, a single serious incident can be
sufficient. Determinations will be made on a case-by-case basis.
(b) Faculty members with administrative responsibilities at the level of departmental executive officer (DEO) or above,
(c) Any staff member whose primary job responsibility is to provide advice regarding a student's academic pursuits or other University-related activities,
(d) A faculty member serving as departmental (or collegiate) director or coordinator of undergraduate or graduate studies, or as a director or coordinator of
any departmental, collegiate, or University off-campus academic program (including any study-abroad program),
(e) The President, Director of Equal Opportunity and Diversity, vice presidents (including assistant and associate vice presidents), and Provost (including
assistant and associate provosts), and those persons' designees,
(f) Directors and supervisors in an employment context, including faculty and staff who supervise student employees, in relation to matters involving the
employees they supervise (other than Department of Public Safety personnel when receiving criminal complaints or reports), and
(3) Complainant: the person who brings a complaint of violation of this policy, who could be an alleged victim, a third party, or an academic or administrative officer of
the University.
(4) Domestic/dating violence: any coercive, abusive, and/or threatening behavior toward a current or former intimate or romantic partner. These behaviors may
include, for example, physical, sexual, emotional, economic, or psychological actions or threats of actions that intimidate, manipulate, humiliate, isolate, frighten,
terrorize, coerce, threaten, or injure the victim/survivor.
(5) Graduate assistant: a graduate student employed by the University as a research assistant or teaching assistant.
(6) Human resources representative: the individual designated as a unit's departmental authority on human resource policies and procedures, and all central human
resources staff.
(7) Instructor: a person engaged in teaching students or in evaluation or supervision, direct or indirect, of a student's academic work.
(8) Member of the University community: any University student, or faculty or staff member.
(9) Protected interests: University employment, education, on-campus living, or participation in a University activity.
(11) Specific and credible allegations: allegations that provide factual details such as, but not limited to, time, place, actions, participants, and witnesses. Allegations do
not necessarily have to be based on firsthand observation of events to be "specific and credible," but direct observation normally results in greater specificity and
credibility than indirect knowledge.
(a) Non-consensual communication including in-person communication, telephone calls, voice messages, text messages, email messages, social networking
site postings, instant messages, postings of pictures or information on websites, written letters, gifts, ordering goods or services, or any other communications
that are undesired and/or place another person in fear;
(b) Following, pursuing, waiting, or showing up uninvited at a workplace, place of residence, classroom, or other locations frequented by a complainant;
(c) Monitoring online activities, surveillance and other types of observation, whether by physical proximity or electronic means, attempts to gather information
about the complainant;
(e) Direct physical and/or verbal threats against a complainant or a complainant's loved ones, including animal abuse;
(f) Gathering of information about a complainant from family, friends, co-workers, and/or classmates;
(g) Manipulative and controlling behaviors such as threats to harm oneself, or threats to harm someone close to the complainant;
(h) Defamation or slander against the complainant, posting false information about the complainant and/or posing as the complainant to post to websites,
newsgroups, blogs, or other sites that allow public contributions, encouraging others to harass the complainant;
(i) Posing as someone other than oneself to initiate transactions, financial credit, loans, or other contractual agreements;
(13) Supervisor: a person who has authority either: 1) to undertake or recommend tangible employment decisions (those that significantly change an employee's
employment status, such as, but not limited to, hiring, firing, promoting, demoting, reviewing performance, reassigning, and compensation decisions) affecting an
employee, or 2) to direct the employee's daily work activities.
(14) Third-party complainant: a person who brings a complaint alleging that someone else has been harassed.
(2) at any location, including through electronic media such as email or social networking websites, and involving any University faculty, staff, or students, provided that:
(a) The incident occurs at a University-sponsored activity or during an event sponsored by an organization affiliated with the University, including a student
organization;
(b) The accused or the complainant was acting in an official capacity for the University during the incident;
(c) The accused or the complainant was conducting University business during the incident;
(d) The conduct has the purpose or reasonably foreseeable effect of substantially interfering with the work or educational performance of UI students, faculty,
or staff;
(e) The conduct creates an intimidating or hostile environment for anyone who is involved in or seeks to participate in University employment, education,
Doyle Appx.
66
526 STATE 773
opsmanual.uiowa.edu • 15 August 2017
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 527 of 533
(f) The conduct demonstrates that the individual poses a reasonable threat to campus safety and security.
b. Acts by persons other than employees or students. The University will make reasonable efforts to address harassment of its faculty, other instructors, staff, or students by
persons participating in University-related programs or activities, conducting business with or visiting the University, even if such persons are not directly affiliated with the
University. Reports of harassment by visitors to campus and other persons not directly affiliated with the University should be made to an academic or administrative officer or
the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity (319-335-0705).
(1) Complaints that a student violated the rights of any member of the University community may be investigated under a process initiated by the Dean of Students
(such as, but not limited to, the Code of Student Life;
(2) Complaints that a faculty member violated the rights of any member of the University community may be investigated under a process initiated by the Provost (such
as, but not limited to, III-15 Professional Ethics and Academic Responsibility);
(3) Complaints that a staff member violated the rights of any member of the University community may be investigated under a process initiated by the Senior Human
Resources Leadership Representative for the staff member's unit (such as, but not limited to, III-16 Ethics and Responsibilities for University of Iowa Staff). The Senior
Human Resources Leadership Representative may appoint a designee to conduct the investigation with the approval of University Human Resources and the Office of
Equal Opportunity and Diversity.
b. A complaint that this policy has been violated may be brought through informal or formal channels by any member of the University community, including a third party, or by the
University itself. A complaint must state specific and credible allegations of harassment to warrant an investigation. There is no time limit for bringing a complaint; however, it
may be difficult to substantiate the allegations if they are made after significant time has passed. Therefore, prompt reporting of complaints is strongly encouraged.
c. Substantial weight will be given to the wishes of the alleged victim when determining how to respond to a complaint. However, the University may investigate the allegations
even without the alleged victim's consent, if circumstances warrant (such as when there are multiple complaints of harassment involving the same person or allegations are
particularly egregious).
d. Anyone (victims or others) who wishes to consult with someone about a specific situation without making a complaint, or who wishes simply to learn more about enforcement of
this Anti-Harassment Policy may contact any of the following offices or organizations:
(1) Office of the Ombudsperson (for faculty, staff, or students), C108 Seashore Hall;
(2) Employee Assistance Program (for faculty or staff), 121-50 University Services Building;
(4) Women's Resource and Action Center (for faculty, other instructors, staff, students, or visitors), Bowman House;
(5) Domestic Violence Intervention Program (certified victim advocates) (for faculty, other instructors, staff, students, or visitors), 1105 South Gilbert Court, Iowa City.
These offices are exempt from the reporting requirements set forth below in II-14.5e. In addition, staff in these offices and organizations generally have professional or legal
obligations to keep communications with their clients confidential. Faculty and staff in other University offices typically do not have confidentiality obligations and may be
required to report allegations as described below in II-14.5e.
(1) counsel the complainant as to the options available under this policy and, at the complainant's request, will help the complainant resolve the complaint informally
and/or refer the complainant to the appropriate office as described below in II-14.6a so that the complainant may bring a formal complaint; and
(2) take appropriate interim action, which may include those actions described below in II-14.10, to address the alleged behavior and protect the health or safety of the
alleged victim, complainant, and/or witnesses.
(1) The Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity will assist in determining whether there is a potential policy violation related to a protected classification, and whether
reporting pursuant to paragraph e below is required.
(2) The Threat Assessment Team is available to assist with assessing situations and risk, planning the actions needed, and carrying out those actions. This team may
be accessed by contacting Organizational Effectiveness, 121-50 University Services Building. (See also VI-32 University of Iowa Threat Assessment
Program or https://hr.uiowa.edu/tat.)
(3) For situations involving students, contact the Dean of Students, 135 Iowa Memorial Union.
d. Substantial weight will be given to the wishes of the alleged victim when determining how to respond to a complaint. When a complaint is brought informally, the person(s)
charged in the complaint will not ordinarily be informed of the complaint without the consent of the alleged victim unless circumstances require (such as when there are multiple
complaints against the same person or allegations are particularly egregious). No disciplinary action can be taken against a person, and there will be no record of the allegations
in the person's employment or student disciplinary file, unless the person is notified of the allegations and given an opportunity to respond.
e. Any academic or administrative officer of the University who becomes aware of specific and credible allegations of harassment based on a protected classification (race, creed,
color, religion, national origin, age, sex, pregnancy, disability, genetic information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military, sexual orientation, gender identity,
associational preferences, or any other classification that deprives the person of consideration as an individual), whether through the report of a complainant (including a third
party) or otherwise, shall report the allegations promptly to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity for assistance in evaluating the situation and determining an appropriate
course of action, even if the alleged victim has requested that no action be taken.
If there is a supervisory relationship between the complainant and/or victim and the respondent, the appropriate course of action will include development of a plan to avoid any
perceived or actual conflict of interest until the complaint is resolved.
The initial report may be verbal, but a written report also must be made after the complaint is resolved using the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity Informal Harassment
Complaint Resolution form, which requires disclosure of the employment or student status of the alleged victim(s), the complainant(s) (if other than the alleged victim), and the
person(s) charged; the department(s) with which those persons are affiliated; a summary of the allegations; and a description of the steps taken to resolve the complaint.
If the person alleged to have engaged in harassment was notified of the existence of the informal complaint and given an opportunity to respond, the names of the parties must
be provided to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity. If the person was not informed of the allegations or was not given an opportunity to respond, then the names of the
parties shall not be provided to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity.
f. Reasonable efforts will be made to process complaints within 21 days, giving consideration to the nature of the allegations and the circumstances surrounding the complaint
process.
g. It is the responsibility of the academic or administrative officer who facilitates the informal resolution of the complaint to monitor compliance with the terms of the informal
resolution. Sanctions up to and including termination of employment or separation from the University may be imposed in the event that an individual fails to comply with the
terms of the informal resolution.
(1) Protected class harassment. If the complaint alleges harassment based on a classification covered by II-3 Human Rights (race, creed, color, religion, national origin,
age, sex, pregnancy, disability, genetic information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military, sexual orientation, gender identity, associational preferences,
or any other classification that deprives the person of consideration as an individual), a formal complaint should be brought to the Office of Equal Opportunity and
Diversity (202 Jessup Hall, 319-335-0705) regardless of the status of the respondent.
(2) Other harassment. If the complaint alleges harassment that is not based on a classification covered by II-3 Human Rights (race, creed, color, religion, national
origin, age, sex, pregnancy, disability, genetic information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military, sexual orientation, gender identity, associational
preferences, or any other classification that deprives the person of consideration as an individual), a person should bring a formal complaint to one of the following
offices depending on the status of the respondent:
(a) Faculty or instructor. If the respondent is a faculty member, teaching assistant, or other instructor, a formal complaint should be brought to the respondent's
collegiate dean or to the Office of the Provost (111 Jessup Hall, 319-335-3565);
(b) Staff member. If the respondent is a staff member, a formal complaint should be brought to the Senior Human Resources Leadership Representative for
the unit employing the respondent;
(c) Student. If the respondent is a student, a formal complaint should be brought to the Dean of Students (135 Iowa Memorial Union, 319-335-1162) or the
Dean of the Graduate College (201 Gilmore Hall, 319-335-2143).
b. A formal complaint may be brought after an informal resolution was not successfully reached, or may be brought immediately without pursuing informal resolution.
c. The purpose of the investigation is to establish whether there is a reasonable basis for believing that a violation of this policy has occurred. In conducting the investigation, the
investigating office will make reasonable efforts to interview the alleged victim, the complainant (if other than the alleged victim), and the respondent, and may interview other
persons believed to have pertinent factual knowledge, as well as review any relevant documentary evidence. At all times, the investigating office will take steps to ensure
confidentiality to the extent possible.
d. When a formal complaint is brought, the respondent will be informed of the allegations, the identity of the complainant, and the facts surrounding the allegations. The
investigation will afford the respondent an opportunity to respond to the allegations and evidence provided by the complainant and/or alleged victim, and to provide a statement
of the facts as perceived by the respondent.
e. At the conclusion of the investigation, the investigating office will issue a written finding which will summarize the evidence gathered and state whether or not there is a
reasonable basis for believing that a violation of this policy has occurred. The written finding will normally be issued within 45 days of when the complaint was filed. When it is
not reasonably possible to issue the finding within 45 days, the investigating office will notify the alleged victim and the respondent that the finding will be delayed and indicate
the reasons for the delay. The alleged victim and the respondent will receive a copy of the written finding, which is to remain confidential as defined below by II-14.12c.
Third-party complainants will be notified only that the proceedings are concluded.
f. If the investigating office finds a reasonable basis for believing that a violation of this policy has occurred, the matter will be referred to the appropriate administrator for further
consideration as outlined in II-14.7 below.
(1) the Office of the Provost, if the respondent is a faculty member or other instructional personnel (except graduate assistants);
Doyle Appx.
68
528 STATE 775
opsmanual.uiowa.edu • 15 August 2017
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 529 of 533
(2) the office of the vice president or dean responsible for the unit employing the person charged, if the respondent is a staff member (including a graduate assistant, in
which case the Dean of the Graduate College also must be notified in order to determine whether ramifications apply for the student's academic progress);
(3) the Dean of Students, if the respondent is a student (including a graduate student, in which case the Dean of the Graduate College also must be notified in order to
determine whether ramifications apply for the student's academic progress);
(1) accept all or any part of the findings of the investigating office;
(2) not accept all or any part of the findings of the investigating office;
c. Violations of this Anti-Harassment Policy may lead to disciplinary sanctions up to and including termination or separation from the University. Sanctions for violations of this
policy should be commensurate with the nature of the violation and the respondent's disciplinary history.
d. In addition to other disciplinary action, persons who are found to have violated this policy may be required to participate in policy and behavioral expectations education. They
also may be required to complete community service, enroll in a specific academic course, attend an educational workshop, and/or make restitution for economic damages
caused by their behavior.
When the respondent is a faculty or staff member, the Employee Assistance Program, 121-50 University Service Building, is available to assist with locating appropriate
resources. When the respondent is a student, University Counseling Service, 3223 Westlawn, is available to assist with locating appropriate resources.
e. It is the responsibility of the appropriate administrator to follow-up with the parties at a reasonable interval(s) to assess their compliance with the disciplinary and/or remedial
sanctions imposed. More serious sanctions, up to and including termination of employment or separation from the University, may be imposed in the event that the individual
fails to comply with the sanctions initially imposed.
Formal disciplinary action taken in response to alleged violations of this policy by:
a. faculty members will be governed by the Faculty Dispute Procedures (III-29) and that portion of those procedures dealing with faculty ethics (III-29.7).
b. staff members will be governed by applicable Regents Merit System Rules and University policies, including III-16 Ethics and Responsibility Statement for Staff, and the
applicable grievance procedures, including III-28 Conflict Management Resources for University Staff;
c. graduate assistants, when dismissal is sought, will be governed by the procedure for dismissal of graduate assistants (III-12.4). When disciplinary action other than dismissal is
taken by the dean of the employing college, a graduate assistant may appeal through those procedures established for graduate assistant employees;
a. Isolated behavior of the kind described in II-14.2, which does not rise to the level of harassment but which if repeated could rise to that level, demonstrates insensitivity that may
warrant remedial measures. Academic or administrative officers who become aware of such behavior in their areas should counsel those who have engaged in the behavior.
Such counsel should include a clear statement that the behavior is not acceptable and should cease, information about the potential consequences if such behavior persists,
and a recommendation, as appropriate, to undertake an educational program designed to help the person(s) understand the harm caused by the behavior.
b. After such counseling occurs, if a person continues to engage in the conduct described above in paragraph a, he or she may be deemed to have engaged in harassment.
b. Throughout the investigation and resolution of a complaint, steps will be taken to protect alleged victims, complainants, witnesses, and others from harm caused by continuation
of the alleged harassing behavior.
c. Retaliation against alleged victims, complainants, and/or witnesses who provide information during an investigation pursuant to this policy is prohibited by II-11 Anti-Retaliation.
Reasonable action will be taken to assure that alleged victims, complainants, and/or witnesses suffer no retaliation as a result of their activities with regard to the process.
d. Steps that may be taken to protect alleged victims, complainants, witnesses, and others from continued harassment and/or retaliation might include:
(1) lateral transfers of one or more of the parties in an employment setting and a comparable move if a classroom setting is involved, and
(2) arrangement that academic and/or employment evaluations concerning complainants or others be made by an appropriate individual other than the respondent.
e. Any retaliation against alleged victims, complainants or witnesses should be reported pursuant to the Anti-Retaliation Policy (II-11). Retaliation may result in disciplinary action
against the person committing the retaliatory act(s).
f. In extraordinary circumstances, the Provost, a dean, a DEO, or any vice president may, at any time during or after an investigation of allegations of harassment, suspend or
partially restrict from employment any employee accused of harassment if the Provost, dean, DEO, or vice president finds that it is reasonably certain that:
(2) serious and immediate harm will ensue if the person continues his or her employment. Similarly, if the respondent is a student, interim sanctions may be imposed
pursuant to Section 10 of the Student Judicial Procedure.
b. In the event the allegations are not substantiated, reasonable steps will be taken to restore the reputation of the respondent if it was damaged by the proceeding. The
respondent may consult with the investigating office regarding reasonable steps to address such concerns.
14.12 Confidentiality
a. In order to empower community members to voice concerns and bring complaints, the confidentiality of all parties will be protected to the greatest extent possible. However,
confidentiality cannot be guaranteed in all cases, and legal obligations may require the University to take some action once it is made aware that harassment may be occurring,
even when the alleged victim is reluctant to proceed. Appropriate University officials will be consulted, including the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity when the complaint
alleges harassment based on a protected classification (see II-14.5e above), and information will be shared only with those individuals who need to know it to implement this
policy.
b. Alleged victims, third-party complainants, and respondents are expected to maintain confidentiality as well. They are not prohibited from discussing the situation outside of the
work or educational environment. However, the matter should not be discussed in the work or educational environment.
c. Dissemination of documents relating to complaints of harassment and/or to the investigation of such complaints, other than as necessary to pursue an appeal, grievance, or
other legal or administrative proceeding, is prohibited.
d. Failure to maintain confidentiality by a respondent may be considered to be a form of retaliation in violation of II-14.10c of this policy. Failure to maintain confidentiality by any
party (alleged victim, third-party complainant, or respondent) may result in disciplinary action.
Doyle Appx.
70
530 STATE 777
opsmanual.uiowa.edu • 15 August 2017
You are viewing an archived web page, collected at the request of University of IowaDocument
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Libraries using
146-2 FiledArchive-It. This
09/12/22 Page 531page
of 533was captured on 15:23:55 Jul 21, 2019, and is part of hide
the University of Iowa Archives collection. The information on this web page may be out of date. See All versions of this archived page. Found 0 archived media items out of 0
total on this page.
Operations Manual
14.1 Rationale
(Amended 7/15)
The purpose of this policy is to prevent harassment within The University of Iowa community and to provide a
process for addressing all forms of harassment if and when it occurs. The University of Iowa is committed to
maintaining an environment that recognizes the inherent worth and dignity of every person, and that fosters
tolerance, sensitivity, understanding, and mutual respect. This commitment requires that the highest value be
placed on the use of reason and that any harassment in the University community be renounced as repugnant
and inimical to its goals. Harassment destroys the mutual trust that binds members of the community in their
pursuit of truth.
The University also is committed strongly to academic freedom and free speech. An educational institution has a
duty to provide a forum in which free speech and differences of opinion are actively encouraged and facilitated,
and where opinions and deeply held beliefs are challenged and debated. Critical to this mission is providing a
nondiscriminatory environment that is conducive to learning. Respect for these rights requires that members of
the University community tolerate expressions of opinion that differ from their own or that they may find
abhorrent.
This policy addresses harassment in all forms based on any classification covered by law and/or II-3 Human
Rights (with the exception of sexual harassment, which is addressed in II-4 Sexual Harassment) and IV-2 Sexual
Misconduct, Dating/Domestic Violence, or Stalking Involving Students, as well as harassment based on other
factors as set forth in this policy.
14.2 Policy
(Amended 5/15; 7/15; 9/21/18)
a. Definition of harassment. "Harassment" means intentional conduct, including speech, directed toward an
identifiable person or persons that is sufficiently severe, pervasive, or persistent that it interferes with work,
educational performance, on-campus living, or participation in a University activity on or off campus.
b. Conduct that constitutes a protected exercise of an individual's rights under the First Amendment to the
United States Constitution (and related principles of academic freedom) shall not be deemed a violation of
this policy. Note: Sexual harassment is addressed by the University's Policy on Sexual Harassment (II-4)
and/or the University's Policy on Sexual Misconduct Involving Students (IV-2).
c. Evidence of harassment. Behavior that may constitute, or be evidence of, prohibited harassment includes,
but is not limited to, the following:
(1) repeated contact with another in person, by telephone, in writing, or through electronic means
(see also II-19 Acceptable Use of Information Technology Resources), after the recipient has made
clear that such contact is unwelcome.
(2) physical, visual, or verbal behavior directed toward another person or an identifiable group of
persons that is intended to be or is reasonably likely to be interpreted as threatening or intimidating.
(3) harassment proscribed by the Iowa Criminal Code, Chapter 708, including, for example, stalking,
the placement of simulated explosives, ordering merchandise or services with intent to annoy, or
false reports to police.
(4) stalking as a course of conduct that is directed at a specific person that would cause a
reasonable person to feel fear.
(5) domestic/dating violence which is coercive, abusive, and/or threatening behavior toward a
current or former intimate or romantic partner.
d. Academic freedom. All proceedings under this section shall respect the principles of academic freedom
stated in the Statement on Tenure and Academic Vitality at The University of Iowa (III-10.1a(2)), which
commits the University to the principle that "free inquiry and expression are essential to the maintenance
of excellence."
e. Penalty enhancement. The University reserves the right to impose more severe sanctions on individuals
whose actions in violation of this policy are motivated by the race, creed, color, religion, national origin,
age, sex, pregnancy, disability, genetic information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military,
sexual orientation, gender identity, or associational preferences of the victim.
f. In determining whether alleged conduct constitutes prohibited harassment, the investigator will consider all
available information and will review the totality of circumstances, including the context in which the
alleged incident(s) occurred. Although repeated incidents generally create a stronger claim of harassment,
a single serious incident can be sufficient. Determinations will be made on a case-by-case basis.
(b) Faculty members with administrative responsibilities at the level of departmental executive
officer (DEO) or above,
(c) Any staff member whose primary job responsibility is to provide advice regarding a
student's academic pursuits or other University-related activities,
(e) The President, Director of Equal Opportunity and Diversity, vice presidents (including
assistant and associate vice presidents), and Provost (including assistant and associate
provosts), and those persons' designees,
(f) Directors and supervisors in an employment context, including faculty and staff who
supervise student employees, in relation to matters involving the employees they supervise
(other than Department of Public Safety personnel when receiving criminal complaints or
reports), and
(3) Complainant: the person who brings a complaint of violation of this policy, who could be an
alleged victim, a third party, or an academic or administrative officer of the University.
(4) Domestic/dating violence: any coercive, abusive, and/or threatening behavior toward a current or
former intimate or romantic partner. These behaviors may include, for example, physical, sexual,
emotional, economic, or psychological actions or threats of actions that intimidate, manipulate,
humiliate, isolate, frighten, terrorize, coerce, threaten, or injure the victim/survivor.
(5) Graduate assistant: a graduate student employed by the University as a research assistant or
teaching assistant.
(6) Human resources representative: the individual designated as a unit's departmental authority on
human resource policies and procedures, and all central human resources staff.
(8) Member of the University community: any University student, or faculty or staff member.
(11) Specific and credible allegations: allegations that provide factual details such as, but not limited
to, time, place, actions, participants, and witnesses. Allegations do not necessarily have to be based
on firsthand observation of events to be "specific and credible," but direct observation normally
results in greater specificity and credibility than indirect knowledge.
(c) Monitoring online activities, surveillance and other types of observation, whether by
physical proximity or electronic means, attempts to gather information about the complainant;
(e) Direct physical and/or verbal threats against a complainant or a complainant's loved ones,
including animal abuse;
(f) Gathering of information about a complainant from family, friends, co-workers, and/or
classmates;
(g) Manipulative and controlling behaviors such as threats to harm oneself, or threats to harm
someone close to the complainant;
(h) Defamation or slander against the complainant, posting false information about the
complainant and/or posing as the complainant to post to websites, newsgroups, blogs, or
other sites that allow public contributions, encouraging others to harass the complainant;
(i) Posing as someone other than oneself to initiate transactions, financial credit, loans, or
other contractual agreements;
(13) Supervisor: a person who has authority either: 1) to undertake or recommend tangible
employment decisions (those that significantly change an employee's employment status, such as,
but not limited to, hiring, firing, promoting, demoting, reviewing performance, reassigning, and
compensation decisions) affecting an employee, or 2) to direct the employee's daily work activities.
(14) Third-party complainant: a person who brings a complaint alleging that someone else has been
harassed. A third party does not need to be a member of the University community (i.e., a current
University faculty, staff, or student).
a. Acts by employees and students. The University's prohibition of harassment as defined by II-14.2 above
applies to acts of faculty, other instructors, staff, or students occurring in one or more of the following
circumstances:
(2) at any location, including through electronic media such as email or social networking websites,
and involving any University faculty, staff, or students, provided that:
(b) The accused or the complainant was acting in an official capacity for the University during
the incident;
(c) The accused or the complainant was conducting University business during the incident;
(d) The conduct has the purpose or reasonably foreseeable effect of substantially interfering
with the work or educational performance of UI students, faculty, or staff;
(e) The conduct creates an intimidating or hostile environment for anyone who is involved in
or seeks to participate in University employment, education, on-campus living, or other
University-sponsored activities; or
(f) The conduct demonstrates that the individual poses a reasonable threat to campus safety
and security.
b. Acts by persons other than employees or students. The University will make reasonable efforts to address
harassment of its faculty, other instructors, staff, or students by persons participating in University-related
programs or activities, conducting business with or visiting the University, even if such persons are not
directly affiliated with the University. Reports of harassment by visitors to campus and other persons not
directly affiliated with the University should be made to an academic or administrative officer or the Office
of Equal Opportunity and Diversity (319-335-0705).
a. Individuals who believe they have experienced harassment are encouraged to report it, even if they are
not certain whether a violation of this policy has occurred. Reports of protected class harassment (see II-3
Human Rights) should be brought to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity under this policy.
Reports also may be directed separately to other offices under applicable policies and procedures as
follows:
(1) Complaints that a student violated the rights of any member of the University community may be
investigated under a process initiated by the Dean of Students (such as, but not limited to, the Code
of Student Life;
(2) Complaints that a faculty member violated the rights of any member of the University community
may be investigated under a process initiated by the Provost (such as, but not limited to, III-
15 Professional Ethics and Academic Responsibility);
(3) Complaints that a staff member violated the rights of any member of the University community
may be investigated under a process initiated by the Senior Human Resources Leadership
Representative for the staff member's unit (such as, but not limited to, III-16 Ethics and
Responsibilities for University of Iowa Staff). The Senior Human Resources Leadership
Representative may appoint a designee to conduct the investigation with the approval of University
Human Resources and the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity.
b. A complaint that this policy has been violated may be brought through informal or formal channels by any
member of the University community, including a third party, or by the University itself. A complaint must
state specific and credible allegations of harassment to warrant an investigation. There is no time limit for
bringing a complaint; however, it may be difficult to substantiate the allegations if they are made after
significant time has passed. Therefore, prompt reporting of complaints is strongly encouraged.
c. Substantial weight will be given to the wishes of the alleged victim when determining how to respond to a
complaint. However, the University may investigate the allegations even without the alleged victim's
consent, if circumstances warrant (such as when there are multiple complaints of harassment involving the
same person or allegations are particularly egregious).
d. Anyone (victims or others) who wishes to consult with someone about a specific situation without making a
complaint, or who wishes simply to learn more about enforcement of this Anti-Harassment Policy may
contact any of the following offices or organizations:
(1) Office of the Ombudsperson (for faculty, staff, or students), 308 Jefferson Building;
(2) Employee Assistance Program (for faculty or staff), 121-50 University Services Building;
(4) Women's Resource and Action Center (for faculty, other instructors, staff, students, or
visitors), Bowman House;
(5) Domestic Violence Intervention Program (certified victim advocates) (for faculty, other
instructors, staff, students, or visitors), 1105 South Gilbert Court, Iowa City.
These offices are exempt from the reporting requirements set forth below in II-14.5e. In addition, staff in
these offices and organizations generally have professional or legal obligations to keep communications
with their clients confidential. Faculty and staff in other University offices typically do not have
confidentiality obligations and may be required to report allegations as described below in II-14.5e.
a. A complaint may be brought informally to any academic or administrative officer of the University (as
defined above in II-14.2g(1)). If the complaint alleges harassment based on a protected classification as
defined by II-3 Human Rights (race, creed, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, pregnancy, disability,
genetic information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military, sexual orientation, gender
identity, associational preferences, or any other classification that deprives the person of consideration as
an individual), the complaint should be brought to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity (319-335-
0705).
(1) counsel the complainant as to the options available under this policy and, at the complainant's
request, will help the complainant resolve the complaint informally and/or refer the complainant to
the appropriate office as described below in II-14.6a so that the complainant may bring a formal
complaint; and
(2) take appropriate interim action, which may include those actions described below in II-14.10, to
address the alleged behavior and protect the health or safety of the alleged victim, complainant,
and/or witnesses.
(1) The Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity will assist in determining whether there is a
potential policy violation related to a protected classification, and whether reporting pursuant to
paragraph e below is required.
(2) The Threat Assessment Team is available to assist with assessing situations and risk, planning
the actions needed, and carrying out those actions. This team may be accessed by contacting
Organizational Effectiveness, 121-50 University Services Building. (See also VI-32 University of
Iowa Threat Assessment Program or https://hr.uiowa.edu/tat.)
(3) For situations involving students, contact the Dean of Students, 135 Iowa Memorial Union.
d. Substantial weight will be given to the wishes of the alleged victim when determining how to respond to a
complaint. When a complaint is brought informally, the person(s) charged in the complaint will not
ordinarily be informed of the complaint without the consent of the alleged victim unless circumstances
require (such as when there are multiple complaints against the same person or allegations are
particularly egregious). No disciplinary action can be taken against a person, and there will be no record of
the allegations in the person's employment or student disciplinary file, unless the person is notified of the
allegations and given an opportunity to respond.
e. Any academic or administrative officer of the University who becomes aware of specific and credible
allegations of harassment based on a protected classification (race, creed, color, religion, national origin,
age, sex, pregnancy, disability, genetic information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military,
sexual orientation, gender identity, associational preferences, or any other classification that deprives the
person of consideration as an individual), whether through the report of a complainant (including a third
party) or otherwise, shall report the allegations promptly to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity
for assistance in evaluating the situation and determining an appropriate course of action, even if the
alleged victim has requested that no action be taken.
If there is a supervisory relationship between the complainant and/or victim and the respondent, the
appropriate course of action will include development of a plan to avoid any perceived or actual conflict of
interest until the complaint is resolved.
The initial report may be verbal, but a written report also must be made after the complaint is resolved
using the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity Informal Harassment Complaint Resolution form, which
requires disclosure of the employment or student status of the alleged victim(s), the complainant(s) (if
other than the alleged victim), and the person(s) charged; the department(s) with which those persons are
affiliated; a summary of the allegations; and a description of the steps taken to resolve the complaint.
If the person alleged to have engaged in harassment was notified of the existence of the informal
complaint and given an opportunity to respond, the names of the parties must be provided to the Office of
Equal Opportunity and Diversity. If the person was not informed of the allegations or was not given an
opportunity to respond, then the names of the parties shall not be provided to the Office of Equal
Opportunity and Diversity.
f. Reasonable efforts will be made to process complaints within 21 days, giving consideration to the nature of
the allegations and the circumstances surrounding the complaint process.
g. It is the responsibility of the academic or administrative officer who facilitates the informal resolution of the
complaint to monitor compliance with the terms of the informal resolution. Sanctions up to and including
termination of employment or separation from the University may be imposed in the event that an
individual fails to comply with the terms of the informal resolution.
a. A formal complaint pursuant to this policy must be brought to one of the following offices for investigation
depending upon the status of the respondent and the nature of the allegations:
(1) Protected class harassment. If the complaint alleges harassment based on a classification
covered by II-3 Human Rights (race, creed, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, pregnancy,
disability, genetic information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military, sexual
orientation, gender identity, associational preferences, or any other classification that deprives the
person of consideration as an individual), a formal complaint should be brought to the Office of
Equal Opportunity and Diversity (202 Jessup Hall, 319-335-0705) regardless of the status of the
respondent.
(2) Other harassment. If the complaint alleges harassment that is not based on a classification
covered by II-3 Human Rights (race, creed, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, pregnancy,
disability, genetic information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military, sexual
orientation, gender identity, associational preferences, or any other classification that deprives the
person of consideration as an individual), a person should bring a formal complaint to one of the
following offices depending on the status of the respondent:
(a) Faculty or instructor. If the respondent is a faculty member, teaching assistant, or other
instructor, a formal complaint should be brought to the respondent's collegiate dean or to the
Office of the Provost (111 Jessup Hall, 319-335-3565);
(b) Staff member. If the respondent is a staff member, a formal complaint should be brought
to the Senior Human Resources Leadership Representative for the unit employing the
respondent;
(c) Student. If the respondent is a student, a formal complaint should be brought to the Dean
of Students (135 Iowa Memorial Union, 319-335-1162) or the Dean of the Graduate College
(201 Gilmore Hall, 319-335-2143).
b. A formal complaint may be brought after an informal resolution was not successfully reached, or may be
brought immediately without pursuing informal resolution.
c. The purpose of the investigation is to establish whether there is a reasonable basis for believing that a
violation of this policy has occurred. In conducting the investigation, the investigating office will make
reasonable efforts to interview the alleged victim, the complainant (if other than the alleged victim), and the
respondent, and may interview other persons believed to have pertinent factual knowledge, as well as
review any relevant documentary evidence. At all times, the investigating office will take steps to ensure
confidentiality to the extent possible.
d. When a formal complaint is brought, the respondent will be informed of the allegations, the identity of the
complainant, and the facts surrounding the allegations. The investigation will afford the respondent an
opportunity to respond to the allegations and evidence provided by the complainant and/or alleged victim,
and to provide a statement of the facts as perceived by the respondent.
e. At the conclusion of the investigation, the investigating office will issue a written finding which will
summarize the evidence gathered and state whether or not there is a reasonable basis for believing that a
violation of this policy has occurred. The written finding will normally be issued within 60 days of when the
complaint was filed. When it is not reasonably possible to issue the finding within 60 days, the
investigating office will notify the alleged victim and the respondent that the finding will be delayed and
indicate the reasons for the delay. The alleged victim and the respondent will receive a copy of the written
finding, which is to remain confidential as defined below by II-14.12c. Third-party complainants will be
notified only that the proceedings are concluded.
f. If the investigating office finds a reasonable basis for believing that a violation of this policy has occurred,
the matter will be referred to the appropriate administrator for further consideration as outlined in II-14.7
below.
a. The following administrators will review the finding of the investigating office:
(1) the Office of the Provost, if the respondent is a faculty member or other instructional personnel
(except graduate assistants);
(2) the office of the vice president or dean responsible for the unit employing the person charged, if
the respondent is a staff member (including a graduate assistant, in which case the Dean of the
Graduate College also must be notified in order to determine whether ramifications apply for the
student's academic progress);
(3) the Dean of Students, if the respondent is a student (including a graduate student, in which case
the Dean of the Graduate College also must be notified in order to determine whether ramifications
apply for the student's academic progress);
(1) accept all or any part of the findings of the investigating office;
(2) not accept all or any part of the findings of the investigating office;
c. Violations of this Anti-Harassment Policy may lead to disciplinary sanctions up to and including termination
or separation from the University. Sanctions for violations of this policy should be commensurate with the
nature of the violation and the respondent's disciplinary history.
d. In addition to other disciplinary action, persons who are found to have violated this policy may be required
to participate in policy and behavioral expectations education. They also may be required to complete
community service, enroll in a specific academic course, attend an educational workshop, and/or make
restitution for economic damages caused by their behavior.
When the respondent is a faculty or staff member, the Employee Assistance Program, 121-50 University
Service Building, is available to assist with locating appropriate resources. When the respondent is a
student, University Counseling Service, 3223 Westlawn, is available to assist with locating appropriate
resources.
e. It is the responsibility of the appropriate administrator to follow-up with the parties at a reasonable
interval(s) to assess their compliance with the disciplinary and/or remedial sanctions imposed. More
serious sanctions, up to and including termination of employment or separation from the University, may
be imposed in the event that the individual fails to comply with the sanctions initially imposed.
Formal disciplinary action taken in response to alleged violations of this policy by:
a. tenure track, clinical track, and research track faculty members will be governed by the Faculty Dispute
Procedures (III-29) and that portion of those procedures dealing with faculty ethics (III-29.7); instructional
track faculty members will be governed by III-10.11 Instructional Track policy and the grievance
procedures therein.
b. staff members will be governed by applicable Regents Merit System Rules and University policies,
including III-16 Ethics and Responsibility Statement for Staff, and the applicable grievance procedures,
including III-28 Conflict Management Resources for University Staff;
c. graduate assistants, when dismissal is sought, will be governed by the procedure for dismissal of graduate
assistants (III-12.4). When disciplinary action other than dismissal is taken by the dean of the employing
college, a graduate assistant may appeal through those procedures established for graduate assistant
employees;
This section addresses isolated behavior that does not rise to the level of a violation of this policy. However, it
should be understood that isolated behavior that is sufficiently severe can constitute harassment in violation of
this policy. The purpose of this section is preventative, in that it authorizes and encourages appropriate
intervention designed to avoid a violation of this policy. However, this section shall not apply to constitutionally
protected speech as provided in II-14.2c above.
a. Isolated behavior of the kind described in II-14.2, which does not rise to the level of harassment but which
if repeated could rise to that level, demonstrates insensitivity that may warrant remedial measures.
Academic or administrative officers who become aware of such behavior in their areas should counsel
those who have engaged in the behavior. Such counsel should include a clear statement that the behavior
is not acceptable and should cease, information about the potential consequences if such behavior
persists, and a recommendation, as appropriate, to undertake an educational program designed to help
the person(s) understand the harm caused by the behavior.
b. After such counseling occurs, if a person continues to engage in the conduct described above in
paragraph a, they may be deemed to have engaged in harassment.
b. Throughout the investigation and resolution of a complaint, steps will be taken to protect alleged victims,
complainants, witnesses, and others from harm caused by continuation of the alleged harassing behavior.
c. Retaliation against alleged victims, complainants, and/or witnesses who provide information during an
investigation pursuant to this policy is prohibited by II-11 Anti-Retaliation. Reasonable action will be taken
to assure that alleged victims, complainants, and/or witnesses suffer no retaliation as a result of their
activities with regard to the process.
d. Steps that may be taken to protect alleged victims, complainants, witnesses, and others from continued
harassment and/or retaliation might include:
(1) lateral transfers of one or more of the parties in an employment setting and a comparable move
if a classroom setting is involved, and
(2) arrangement that academic and/or employment evaluations concerning complainants or others
be made by an appropriate individual other than the respondent.
e. Any retaliation against alleged victims, complainants or witnesses should be reported pursuant to the Anti-
Retaliation Policy (II-11). Retaliation may result in disciplinary action against the person committing the
retaliatory act(s).
f. In extraordinary circumstances, the Provost, a dean, a DEO, or any vice president may, at any time during
or after an investigation of allegations of harassment, suspend or partially restrict from employment any
employee accused of harassment if the Provost, dean, DEO, or vice president finds that it is reasonably
certain that:
(2) serious and immediate harm will ensue if the person continues their employment. Similarly, if the
respondent is a student, interim sanctions may be imposed pursuant to Section 10 of the Student
Judicial Procedure.
This policy shall not be used to bring knowingly false or malicious allegations of harassment. Making such
allegations may subject the complaining party to remedial and/or disciplinary action up to and including
termination or separation from the University. Any such disciplinary action will be initiated by the appropriate
administrator overseeing the complainant(s).
14.12 Confidentiality
a. In order to empower community members to voice concerns and bring complaints, the confidentiality of all
parties will be protected to the greatest extent possible. However, confidentiality cannot be guaranteed in
all cases, and legal obligations may require the University to take some action once it is made aware that
harassment may be occurring, even when the alleged victim is reluctant to proceed. Appropriate University
officials will be consulted, including the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity when the complaint
alleges harassment based on a protected classification (see II-14.5e above), and information will be
shared only with those individuals who need to know it to implement this policy.
b. Alleged victims, third-party complainants, and respondents are expected to maintain confidentiality as well.
They are not prohibited from discussing the situation outside of the work or educational environment.
However, the matter should not be discussed in the work or educational environment.
14.13 Education
(9/18)
Training on this policy is included with the mandatory training prescribed in the University's Policy on Sexual
Harassment (see II-4.6a(2)).
Doyle Appx. 531 STATE 778
You are viewing an archived web page, collected at the request of University of IowaDocument
Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Libraries using
146-2 FiledArchive-It. This
09/12/22 Page 532page
of 533was captured on 6:48:24 Aug 15, 2020, and is part of hide
the University of Iowa Archives collection. The information on this web page may be out of date. See All versions of this archived page. Found 0 archived media items out of 0
total on this page.
Operations Manual
Appendix: Organizational 14.10 Protection of Impacted Parties, Reporting Parties, and Others
Charts 14.11 Protection of the Responding Party
14.12 Confidentiality
View full contents
14.13 Education
14.1 Rationale
(Amended 7/15)
The purpose of this policy is to prevent harassment within The University of Iowa community and to provide a
process for addressing all forms of harassment if and when it occurs. The University of Iowa is committed to
maintaining an environment that recognizes the inherent worth and dignity of every person, and that fosters
tolerance, sensitivity, understanding, and mutual respect. This commitment requires that the highest value be
placed on the use of reason and that any harassment in the University community be renounced as repugnant
and inimical to its goals. Harassment destroys the mutual trust that binds members of the community in their
pursuit of truth.
The University also is committed strongly to academic freedom and free speech. An educational institution has a
duty to provide a forum in which free speech and differences of opinion are actively encouraged and facilitated,
and where opinions and deeply held beliefs are challenged and debated. Critical to this mission is providing a
nondiscriminatory environment that is conducive to learning. Respect for these rights requires that members of
the University community tolerate expressions of opinion that differ from their own or that they may find
abhorrent.
This policy addresses harassment in all forms based on any classification covered by law and/or II-3 Human
Rights (with the exception of sexual harassment, which is addressed in II-4 Sexual Harassment) and IV-2 Sexual
Misconduct, Dating/Domestic Violence, or Stalking Involving Students, as well as harassment based on other
factors as set forth in this policy.
14.2 Policy
(Amended 5/15; 7/15; 9/21/18; 1/20)
Effective January 2020, this policy has been revised. For individual changes, see the redlined version.
a. Definition of harassment. "Harassment" means intentional conduct, including speech, directed toward an
identifiable person or persons that is sufficiently severe, pervasive, or persistent that it interferes with work,
educational performance, on-campus living, or participation in a University activity on or off campus.
b. Conduct that constitutes a protected exercise of an individual's rights under the First Amendment to the
United States Constitution (and related principles of academic freedom) shall not be deemed a violation of
this policy. Note: Sexual harassment is addressed by the University's Policy on Sexual Harassment (II-4)
and/or the University's Policy on Sexual Misconduct Involving Students (IV-2).
c. Evidence of harassment. Behavior that may constitute, or be evidence of, prohibited harassment includes,
but is not limited to, the following:
(1) repeated contact with another in person, by telephone, in writing, or through electronic means
(see also II-19 Acceptable Use of Information Technology Resources), after the recipient has made
clear that such contact is unwelcome.
(2) physical, visual, or verbal behavior directed toward another person or an identifiable group of
persons that is intended to be or is reasonably likely to be interpreted as threatening or intimidating.
(3) harassment proscribed by the Iowa Criminal Code, Chapter 708, including, for example, stalking,
the placement of simulated explosives, ordering merchandise or services with intent to annoy, or
false reports to police.
(4) stalking as a course of conduct that is directed at a specific person that would cause a
reasonable person to feel fear.
(5) domestic/dating violence which is coercive, abusive, and/or threatening behavior toward a
current or former intimate or romantic partner.
d. Academic freedom. All proceedings under this section shall respect the principles of academic freedom
stated in the Statement on Tenure and Academic Vitality at The University of Iowa (III-10.1a(2)), which
commits the University to the principle that "free inquiry and expression are essential to the maintenance
of excellence."
e. Penalty enhancement. The University reserves the right to impose more severe sanctions on individuals
whose actions in violation of this policy are motivated by the race, creed, color, religion, national origin,
age, sex, pregnancy, disability, genetic information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military,
sexual orientation, gender identity, or associational preferences of the impacted party.
f. In determining whether alleged conduct constitutes prohibited harassment, the investigator will consider all
available information and will review the totality of circumstances, including the context in which the
alleged incident(s) occurred. Although repeated incidents generally create a stronger claim of harassment,
a single serious incident can be sufficient. Determinations will be made on a case-by-case basis.
(b) Faculty members with administrative responsibilities at the level of departmental executive
officer (DEO) or above,
(c) Any staff member whose primary job responsibility is to provide advice regarding a
student's academic pursuits or other University-related activities,
(e) The President, Director of Equal Opportunity and Diversity, vice presidents (including
assistant and associate vice presidents), and Provost (including assistant and associate
provosts), and those persons' designees,
(f) Directors and supervisors in an employment context, including faculty and staff who
supervise student employees, in relation to matters involving the employees they supervise
(other than Department of Public Safety personnel when receiving criminal complaints or
reports), and
(g) Human resource representatives (including all central University Human Resources staff).
(2) Allegations: to the extent possible, allegations of policy violations should provide factual details
such as, but not limited to, time, place, actions, participants, and witnesses. Allegations do not
necessarily have to be based on firsthand observation of events to be "specific and credible," but
direct observation normally results in greater specificity and credibility than indirect knowledge.
(3) Domestic/dating violence: any coercive, abusive, and/or threatening behavior toward a current or
former intimate or romantic partner. These behaviors may include, for example, physical, sexual,
emotional, economic, or psychological actions or threats of actions that intimidate, manipulate,
humiliate, isolate, frighten, terrorize, coerce, threaten, or injure the impacted party.
(4) Graduate assistant: a graduate student employed by the University as a research assistant or
teaching assistant.
(5) Human resources representative: the individual designated as a unit's departmental authority on
human resource policies and procedures, and all central human resources staff.
(8) Member of the University community: any University student, or faculty or staff member.
(10) Reporting party: the person who brings a complaint of violation of this policy, who could be an
impacted party, a third-party reporter, or an academic or administrative officer of the University.
(c) Monitoring online activities, surveillance and other types of observation, whether by
physical proximity or electronic means, attempts to gather information about an impacted
party;
(e) Direct physical and/or verbal threats against an impacted party or an impacted party's
loved ones, including animal abuse;
(f) Gathering of information about an impacted party from family, friends, co-workers, and/or
classmates;
(g) Manipulative and controlling behaviors such as threats to harm oneself, or threats to harm
someone close to the impacted party;
(h) Defamation or slander against the impacted party, posting false information about
the impacted party and/or posing as the impacted party to post to websites, newsgroups,
blogs, or other sites that allow public contributions, encouraging others to harass
the impacted party;
(i) Posing as someone other than oneself to initiate transactions, financial credit, loans, or
other contractual agreements;
(13) Supervisor: a person who has authority either: 1) to undertake or recommend tangible
employment decisions (those that significantly change an employee's employment status, such as,
but not limited to, hiring, firing, promoting, demoting, reviewing performance, reassigning, and
compensation decisions) affecting an employee, or 2) to direct the employee's daily work activities.
(14) Third-party reporter: a person who brings a complaint alleging that someone else has been
harassed. A third-party reporter does not need to be a member of the University community (i.e., a
current University faculty, staff, or student).
Effective January 2020, this policy has been revised. For individual changes, see the redlined version.
a. Acts by employees and students. The University's prohibition of harassment as defined by II-14.2 above
applies to acts of faculty, other instructors, staff, or students occurring in one or more of the following
circumstances:
(2) at any location, including through electronic media such as email or social networking websites,
and involving any University faculty, staff, or students, provided that:
(b) The responding party or the impacted party was acting in an official capacity for the
University during the incident;
(c) The responding party or the impacted party was conducting University business during the
incident;
(d) The conduct has the purpose or reasonably foreseeable effect of substantially interfering
with the work or educational performance of UI students, faculty, or staff;
(e) The conduct creates an intimidating or hostile environment for anyone who is involved in
or seeks to participate in University employment, education, on-campus living, or other
University-sponsored activities; or
(f) The conduct demonstrates that the individual poses a reasonable threat to campus safety
and security.
b. Acts by persons other than employees or students. The University will make reasonable efforts to address
harassment of its faculty, other instructors, staff, or students by persons participating in University-related
programs or activities, conducting business with or visiting the University, even if such persons are not
directly affiliated with the University. Reports of harassment by visitors to campus and other persons not
directly affiliated with the University should be made to an academic or administrative officer or the Office
of Equal Opportunity and Diversity (319-335-0705).
Effective January 2020, this policy has been revised. For individual changes, see the redlined version.
a. Individuals who believe they have experienced harassment are encouraged to report it, even if they are
not certain whether a violation of this policy has occurred. Reports of protected class harassment (see II-3
Human Rights) should be brought to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity under this policy.
Reports also may be directed separately to other offices under applicable policies and procedures as
follows:
(1) Complaints that a student violated the rights of any member of the University community may be
investigated under a process initiated by the Dean of Students (such as, but not limited to, the Code
of Student Life;
(2) Complaints that a faculty member violated the rights of any member of the University community
may be investigated under a process initiated by the Provost (such as, but not limited to, III-
15 Professional Ethics and Academic Responsibility);
(3) Complaints that a staff member violated the rights of any member of the University community
may be investigated under a process initiated by the Senior Human Resources Leadership
Representative for the staff member's unit (such as, but not limited to, III-16 Ethics and
Responsibilities for University of Iowa Staff). The Senior Human Resources Leadership
Representative may appoint a designee to conduct the investigation with the approval of University
Human Resources and the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity.
b. A complaint that this policy has been violated may be brought through informal or formal channels by any
member of the University community, including a third-party reporter, or by the University itself. A complaint
must clearly state the allegations of harassment to warrant an investigation. There is no time limit for
bringing a complaint; however, it may be difficult to substantiate the allegations if they are made after
significant time has passed. Therefore, prompt reporting of complaints is strongly encouraged.
c. Substantial weight will be given to the wishes of the impacted party when determining how to respond to a
complaint. However, the University may investigate the allegations even without the impacted party's
consent, if circumstances warrant (such as when there are multiple complaints of harassment involving the
same person or allegations are particularly egregious).
d. Anyone (impacted parties or others) who wishes to consult with someone about a specific situation without
making a complaint, or who wishes simply to learn more about enforcement of this Anti-Harassment Policy
may contact any of the following offices or organizations: These offices are exempt from the reporting
requirements set forth below in II-14.5e. In addition, staff in these offices and organizations generally have
professional or legal obligations to keep communications with their clients confidential. Faculty and staff in
other University offices typically do not have confidentiality obligations and may be required to report
allegations as described below in II-14.5e.
(1) Office of the Ombudsperson (for faculty, staff, or students), 308 Jefferson Building;
(2) Employee Assistance Program (for faculty or staff), 121-50 University Services Building;
(4) Women's Resource and Action Center (for faculty, other instructors, staff, students, or
visitors), Bowman House;
(5) Domestic Violence Intervention Program (certified advocates) (for faculty, other instructors, staff,
students, or visitors), 1105 South Gilbert Court, Iowa City.
Effective January 2020, this policy has been revised. For individual changes, see the redlined version.
a. A complaint may be brought informally to any academic or administrative officer of the University (as
defined above in II-14.2g(1)). If the complaint alleges harassment based on a protected classification as
defined by II-3 Human Rights (race, creed, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, pregnancy, disability,
genetic information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military, sexual orientation, gender
identity, associational preferences, or any other classification that deprives the person of consideration as
an individual), the complaint should be brought to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity (319-335-
0705).
(1) counsel the impacted or reporting party as to the options available under this policy and, at the
impacted party's request, will help the impacted party resolve the complaint informally and/or refer
the impacted party to the appropriate office as described below in II-14.6a so that the impacted
party may bring a formal complaint; and
(2) take appropriate interim action, which may include those actions described below in II-14.10, to
address the alleged behavior and protect the health or safety of the impacted party, reporting party,
and/or witnesses.
(1) The Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity will assist in determining whether there is a
potential policy violation related to a protected classification, and whether reporting pursuant to
paragraph e below is required.
(2) The Threat Assessment Team is available to assist with assessing situations and risk, planning
the actions needed, and carrying out those actions. This team may be accessed by contacting
Organizational Effectiveness, 121-50 University Services Building. (See also VI-32 University of
Iowa Threat Assessment Program or https://hr.uiowa.edu/tat.)
(3) For situations involving students, contact the Dean of Students, 135 Iowa Memorial Union.
d. Substantial weight will be given to the wishes of the impacted party when determining how to respond to a
complaint. When a complaint is brought informally, the person(s) charged in the complaint will not
ordinarily be informed of the complaint without the consent of the impacted party unless circumstances
require (such as when there are multiple complaints against the same person or allegations are
particularly egregious). No disciplinary action can be taken against a person, and there will be no record of
the allegations in the person's employment or student disciplinary file, unless the person is notified of the
allegations and given an opportunity to respond.
e. Any academic or administrative officer of the University who becomes aware of specific and credible
allegations of harassment based on a protected classification (race, creed, color, religion, national origin,
age, sex, pregnancy, disability, genetic information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military,
sexual orientation, gender identity, associational preferences, or any other classification that deprives the
person of consideration as an individual), whether through the report of an impacted or a reporting
party (including a third-party reporter) or otherwise, shall report the allegations promptly to the Office of
Equal Opportunity and Diversity for assistance in evaluating the situation and determining an appropriate
course of action, even if the impacted party has requested that no action be taken.
If there is a supervisory relationship between the reporting party and/or impacted party and the responding
party, the appropriate course of action will include development of a plan to avoid any perceived or actual
conflict of interest until the complaint is resolved.
The initial report may be verbal, but a written report also must be made after the complaint is resolved
using the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity Informal Harassment Complaint Resolution form, which
requires disclosure of the employment or student status of the impacted party(ies), the reporting party(ies)
(if other than the impacted party), and the person(s) charged; the department(s) with which those persons
are affiliated; a summary of the allegations; and a description of the steps taken to resolve the complaint.
If the person alleged to have engaged in harassment was notified of the existence of the informal
complaint and given an opportunity to respond, the names of the parties must be provided to the Office of
Equal Opportunity and Diversity. If the person was not informed of the allegations or was not given an
opportunity to respond, then the names of the parties shall not be provided to the Office of Equal
Opportunity and Diversity.
f. Reasonable efforts will be made to process complaints within 21 days, giving consideration to the nature of
the allegations and the circumstances surrounding the complaint process.
g. It is the responsibility of the academic or administrative officer who facilitates the informal resolution of the
complaint to monitor compliance with the terms of the informal resolution. Sanctions up to and including
termination of employment or separation from the University may be imposed in the event that an
individual fails to comply with the terms of the informal resolution.
Effective January 2020, this policy has been revised. For individual changes, see the redlined version.
a. A formal complaint pursuant to this policy must be brought to one of the following offices for investigation
depending upon the status of the responding party and the nature of the allegations:
(1) Protected class harassment. If the complaint alleges harassment based on a classification
covered by II-3 Human Rights (race, creed, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, pregnancy,
disability, genetic information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military, sexual
orientation, gender identity, associational preferences, or any other classification that deprives the
person of consideration as an individual), a formal complaint should be brought to the Office of
Equal Opportunity and Diversity (202 Jessup Hall, 319-335-0705) regardless of the status of the
responding party.
(2) Other harassment. If the complaint alleges harassment that is not based on a classification
covered by II-3 Human Rights (race, creed, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, pregnancy,
disability, genetic information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military, sexual
orientation, gender identity, associational preferences, or any other classification that deprives the
person of consideration as an individual), a person should bring a formal complaint to one of the
following offices depending on the status of the responding party:
(a) Faculty or instructor. If the responding party is a faculty member, teaching assistant, or
other instructor, a formal complaint should be brought to the responding party's collegiate
dean or to the Office of the Provost (111 Jessup Hall, 319-335-3565);
(b) Staff member. If the responding party is a staff member, a formal complaint should be
brought to the Senior Human Resources Leadership Representative for the unit employing
the responding party;
(c) Student. If the responding party is a student, a formal complaint should be brought to the
Dean of Students (135 Iowa Memorial Union, 319-335-1162) or the Dean of the Graduate
College (201 Gilmore Hall, 319-335-2143).
b. A formal complaint may be brought after an informal resolution was not successfully reached, or may be
brought immediately without pursuing informal resolution.
c. The purpose of the investigation is to establish whether there is a reasonable basis for believing that a
violation of this policy has occurred. In conducting the investigation, the investigating office will make
reasonable efforts to interview the impacted party, the reporting party (if other than the impacted party),
and the responding party, and may interview other persons believed to have pertinent factual knowledge,
as well as review any relevant documentary evidence. At all times, the investigating office will take steps to
ensure confidentiality to the extent possible.
d. When a formal complaint is brought, the responding party will be informed of the allegations, the identity of
the impacted and/or reporting party, and the facts surrounding the allegations. The investigation will afford
the responding party an opportunity to respond to the allegations and evidence provided by the reporting
party and/or impacted party, and to provide a statement of the facts as perceived by the responding party.
e. At the conclusion of the investigation, the investigating office will issue a written finding which will
summarize the evidence gathered and state whether or not there is a reasonable basis for believing that a
violation of this policy has occurred. The written finding will normally be issued within 60 days of when the
complaint was filed. When it is not reasonably possible to issue the finding within 60 days, the
investigating office will notify the impacted party and the responding party that the finding will be delayed
and indicate the reasons for the delay. The impacted party and the responding party will receive a copy of
the written finding, which is to remain confidential as defined below by II-14.12c. Third-party reporters will
be notified only that the proceedings are concluded.
f. If the investigating office finds a reasonable basis for believing that a violation of this policy has occurred,
the matter will be referred to the appropriate administrator for further consideration as outlined in II-14.7
below.
Effective January 2020, this policy has been revised. For individual changes, see the redlined version.
a. The following administrators will review the finding of the investigating office:
(1) the Office of the Provost, if the responding party is a faculty member or other instructional
personnel (except graduate assistants);
(2) the office of the vice president or dean responsible for the unit employing the person charged, if
the responding party is a staff member (including a graduate assistant, in which case the Dean of
the Graduate College also must be notified in order to determine whether ramifications apply for the
student's academic progress);
(3) the Dean of Students, if the responding party is a student (including a graduate student, in which
case the Dean of the Graduate College also must be notified in order to determine whether
ramifications apply for the student's academic progress);
(1) accept all or any part of the findings of the investigating office;
(2) not accept all or any part of the findings of the investigating office;
(3) reach a negotiated settlement of the complaint with the responding party; or
c. Violations of this Anti-Harassment Policy may lead to disciplinary sanctions up to and including termination
or separation from the University. Sanctions for violations of this policy should be commensurate with the
nature of the violation and the responding party's disciplinary history.
d. In addition to other disciplinary action, persons who are found to have violated this policy may be required
to participate in policy and behavioral expectations education. They also may be required to complete
community service, enroll in a specific academic course, attend an educational workshop, and/or make
restitution for economic damages caused by their behavior.
When the responding party is a faculty or staff member, the Employee Assistance Program, 121-50
University Service Building, is available to assist with locating appropriate resources. When the responding
party is a student, University Counseling Service, 3223 Westlawn, is available to assist with locating
appropriate resources.
e. It is the responsibility of the appropriate administrator to follow-up with the parties at a reasonable
interval(s) to assess their compliance with the disciplinary and/or remedial sanctions imposed. More
serious sanctions, up to and including termination of employment or separation from the University, may
be imposed in the event that the individual fails to comply with the sanctions initially imposed.
Formal disciplinary action taken in response to alleged violations of this policy by:
a. tenure track, clinical track, and research track faculty members will be governed by the Faculty Dispute
Procedures (III-29) and that portion of those procedures dealing with faculty ethics (III-29.7); instructional
track faculty members will be governed by III-10.11 Instructional Track policy and the grievance
procedures therein.
b. staff members will be governed by applicable Regents Merit System Rules and University policies,
including III-16 Ethics and Responsibility Statement for Staff, and the applicable grievance procedures,
including III-28 Conflict Management Resources for University Staff;
c. graduate assistants, when dismissal is sought, will be governed by the procedure for dismissal of graduate
assistants (III-12.4). When disciplinary action other than dismissal is taken by the dean of the employing
college, a graduate assistant may appeal through those procedures established for graduate assistant
employees;
This section addresses isolated behavior that does not rise to the level of a violation of this policy. However, it
should be understood that isolated behavior that is sufficiently severe can constitute harassment in violation of
this policy. The purpose of this section is preventative, in that it authorizes and encourages appropriate
intervention designed to avoid a violation of this policy. However, this section shall not apply to constitutionally
protected speech as provided in II-14.2c above.
a. Isolated behavior of the kind described in II-14.2, which does not rise to the level of harassment but which
if repeated could rise to that level, demonstrates insensitivity that may warrant remedial measures.
Academic or administrative officers who become aware of such behavior in their areas should counsel
those who have engaged in the behavior. Such counsel should include a clear statement that the behavior
is not acceptable and should cease, information about the potential consequences if such behavior
persists, and a recommendation, as appropriate, to undertake an educational program designed to help
the person(s) understand the harm caused by the behavior.
b. After such counseling occurs, if a person continues to engage in the conduct described above in
paragraph a, they may be deemed to have engaged in harassment.
Effective January and March 2020, this policy has been revised. For individual changes, see the redlined version.
a. Impacted parties will be informed of relevant procedural steps taken during the investigation and any
interim protective measures taken. An impacted party may be accompanied by an advocate and other
support persons during the investigation process if the impacted party so desires.
b. Throughout the investigation and resolution of a complaint, steps will be taken to protect impacted parties,
reporting parties, witnesses, and others from harm caused by continuation of the alleged harassing
behavior.
c. Retaliation against impacted parties, reporting parties, and/or witnesses who provide information during an
investigation pursuant to this policy is prohibited by II-11 Anti-Retaliation. Reasonable action will be taken
to assure that impacted parties, reporting parties, and/or witnesses suffer no retaliation as a result of their
activities with regard to the process.
d. Steps that may be taken to protect impacted parties, reporting parties, witnesses, and others from
continued harassment and/or retaliation might include:
(1) lateral transfers of one or more of the parties in an employment setting and a comparable move
if a classroom setting is involved, and
(2) arrangement that academic and/or employment evaluations concerning reporting parties or
others be made by an appropriate individual other than the responding party.
e. Any retaliation against impacted parties, reporting parties or witnesses should be reported pursuant to the
Anti-Retaliation Policy (II-11). Retaliation may result in disciplinary action against the person committing
the retaliatory act(s).
f. The Provost, a dean, a DEO, or any vice president may, at any time during or after an investigation of
allegations of harassment, place on leave or otherwise restrict from employment and/or access to
campus any responding party if the Provost, dean, DEO, or vice president finds that it is reasonably
certain that:
(2) serious and immediate harm will ensue if the person continues to be present at work. Similarly, if
the responding party is a student, interim sanctions may be imposed pursuant to Section 10 of
the Student Misconduct Procedure.
Effective January 2020, this policy has been revised. For individual changes, see the redlined version.
This policy shall not be used to bring knowingly false or malicious allegations of harassment. Making such
allegations may subject the complaining party to remedial and/or disciplinary action up to and including
termination or separation from the University. Any such disciplinary action will be initiated by the appropriate
administrator overseeing the reporting party(ies).
14.12 Confidentiality
(Amended 1/20)
Effective January 2020, this policy has been revised. For individual changes, see the redlined version.
a. In order to empower community members to voice concerns and bring complaints, the confidentiality of all
parties will be protected to the greatest extent possible. However, confidentiality cannot be guaranteed in
all cases, and legal obligations may require the University to take some action once it is made aware that
harassment may be occurring, even when the impacted party is reluctant to proceed. Appropriate
University officials will be consulted, including the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity when the
complaint alleges harassment based on a protected classification (see II-14.5e above), and information
will be shared only with those individuals who need to know it to implement this policy.
b. Impacted parties, third-party reporters, and responding parties are expected to maintain confidentiality as
well. They are not prohibited from discussing the situation outside of the work or educational environment.
However, the matter should not be discussed in the work or educational environment.
14.13 Education
(9/18)
Training on this policy is included with the mandatory training prescribed in the University's Policy on Sexual
Harassment (see II-4.6a(2)).
Doyle Appx. 532 STATE 779
Content Structure People Configuration Reports Help Case 4:20-cv-00366-SMR-HCA Document 146-2 Filed 09/12/22 Page 533 of 533 Hello bartos Log out
Operations Manual
I. Governance
Chapter 14 – Anti-Harassment
II. Community Policies (Amended 6/05; 12/05; 12/11; 8/13; 5/15; 7/15; 7/1/17; 9/21/18; 1/20; 3/20; 6/10/21)
Effective June 10, 2021, this policy has been revised. For individual changes, see the redlined versions of II-14.1 and II-
III. Human Resources
14.2. For revisions made in January and March 2020, see here.
IV. Students
14.1 Rationale
14.2 Policy
V. Administrative, Financial,
and Facilities Policies 14.3 Scope of Policy
14.4 Bringing a Complaint
VI. Services
14.5 Informal Resolution of Complaints
14.1 Rationale
(Amended 7/15; 6/10/21)
Effective June 10, 2021, this policy has been revised. For individual changes, see the redlined version.
The purpose of this policy is to prevent harassment within The University of Iowa community and to provide a process
for addressing all forms of harassment if and when it occurs. The University of Iowa is committed to maintaining an
environment that recognizes the inherent worth and dignity of every person, and that fosters tolerance, sensitivity,
understanding, and mutual respect. This commitment requires that the highest value be placed on the use of reason and
that any harassment in the University community be renounced as repugnant and inimical to its goals. Harassment
destroys the mutual trust that binds members of the community in their pursuit of truth.
The University also is committed strongly to academic freedom and freedom of expression. In upholding these ideals,
the University will be guided by the following principles:
a. The primary function of the University of Iowa is the discovery, improvement, transmission, and dissemination of
knowledge by means of research, teaching, discussion, and debate. To fulfill this function, the University of Iowa
must strive to ensure the fullest degree of intellectual freedom and free expression allowed under the First
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
b. It is not the proper role of the University of Iowa to shield individuals from speech protected by the First
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which may include ideas and opinions an individual finds
unwelcome, disagreeable, or even offensive.
c. It is the proper role of the University of Iowa to encourage diversity of thoughts, ideas, and opinions and to
encourage, within the bounds of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the peaceful,
respectful, and safe exercise of First Amendment rights.
d. Faculty, staff, and students have the freedom to discuss any problem that presents itself, assemble, and engage in
spontaneous expressive activity on campus, within the bounds of established principles of the First Amendment
to the Constitution of the United States, and subject to reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions, as
defined in this Operations Manual, that are consistent with established First Amendment principles.
This policy addresses harassment in all forms based on any classification covered by law and/or II-3 Human Rights (with
the exception of sexual harassment, which is addressed in II-4 Interim Policy on Sexual Harassment and Sexual
Misconduct), as well as harassment based on other factors as set forth in this policy.
14.2 Policy
(Amended 5/15; 7/15; 9/21/18; 1/20; 6/10/21)
Effective June 10, 2021, this policy has been revised. For individual changes, see the redlined version. For January 2020
revisions, see here.
a. Definition of harassment. "Harassment" means intentional conduct, including speech, directed toward an
identifiable person or persons that
(1) threatens serious harm and is directed or likely directed to provoke imminent unlawful actions; or
(2) is sufficiently severe, pervasive, and subjectively and objectively offensive that it unreasonably
interferes with work or educational opportunities or benefits, including, without limitation, on-campus
living or participation in a University activity on or off campus
See Iowa Code 261H.3.5: "This chapter shall not be interpreted as preventing public institutions of higher
education from prohibiting, limiting, or restricting expression that the first amendment to the Constitution
of the United States does not protect, including but not limited to a threat of serious harm and expression
directed or likely directed to provoke imminent unlawful actions; or from prohibiting harassment,
including but not limited to expression which is so severe, pervasive, and subjectively and objectively
offensive that the expression unreasonably interferes with an individual’s access to educational
opportunities or benefits provided by a public institution of higher education."
b. Conduct that constitutes a protected exercise of an individual's rights under the First Amendment to the United
States Constitution (and related principles of academic freedom) shall not be deemed a violation of this policy.
Note: Sexual harassment is addressed by the University's Policy on Sexual Harassment (II-4) and/or the
University's Policy on Sexual Misconduct Involving Students (IV-2).
c. Evidence of harassment. Behavior that may constitute, or be evidence of, prohibited harassment includes, but is
not limited to, the following:
(1) repeated contact with another in person, by telephone, in writing, or through electronic means (see
also II-19 Acceptable Use of Information Technology Resources), after the recipient has made clear that
such contact is unwelcome.
(2) harassment proscribed by the Iowa Criminal Code, Chapter 708, including, for example, stalking, the
placement of simulated explosives, ordering merchandise or services with intent to annoy, or false reports
to police.
(3) stalking as a course of conduct that is directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable
person to feel fear.
(4) domestic/dating violence which is coercive, abusive, and/or threatening behavior toward a current or
former intimate or romantic partner.
d. Penalty enhancement. The University reserves the right to impose more severe sanctions on individuals whose
actions in violation of this policy are motivated by the race, creed, color, religion, national origin, age, sex,
pregnancy, disability, genetic information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military, sexual orientation,
gender identity, or associational preferences of the impacted party.
e. In determining whether alleged conduct constitutes prohibited harassment, the investigator will consider all
available information and will review the totality of circumstances, including the context in which the alleged
incident(s) occurred. Although repeated incidents generally create a stronger claim of harassment, a single
serious incident can be sufficient. Determinations will be made on a case-by-case basis.
(b) Faculty members with administrative responsibilities at the level of departmental executive
officer (DEO) or above,
(c) Any staff member whose primary job responsibility is to provide advice regarding a student's
academic pursuits or other University-related activities,
(e) The President, Director of Equal Opportunity and Diversity, vice presidents (including assistant
and associate vice presidents), and Provost (including assistant and associate provosts), and those
persons' designees,
(f) Directors and supervisors in an employment context, including faculty and staff who supervise
student employees, in relation to matters involving the employees they supervise (other than
Department of Public Safety personnel when receiving criminal complaints or reports), and
(g) Human resource representatives (including all central University Human Resources staff).
(2) Allegations: to the extent possible, allegations of policy violations should provide factual details such
as, but not limited to, time, place, actions, participants, and witnesses. Allegations do not necessarily have
to be based on firsthand observation of events to be "specific and credible," but direct observation
normally results in greater specificity and credibility than indirect knowledge.
(3) Graduate assistant: a graduate student employed by the University as a research assistant or teaching
assistan
(4) Human resources representative: the individual designated as a unit's departmental authority on
human resource policies and procedures, and all central human resources staff.
(6) Instructor: a person engaged in teaching students or in evaluation or supervision, direct or indirect, of a
student's academic work.
(7) Member of the University community: any University student, or faculty or staff member.
(9) Reporting party: the person who brings a complaint of violation of this policy, who could be an
impacted party, a third-party reporter, or an academic or administrative officer of the University.
(11) Stalking:
(a) "Stalking" means engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause
a reasonable person to:
(iii) Direct physical and/or verbal threats against an impacted party or an impacted party's
loved ones, including animal abuse;
(iv) Gathering of information about an impacted party from family, friends, co-workers,
and/or classmates;
(v) Manipulative and controlling behaviors such as threats to harm oneself, or threats to
harm someone close to the impacted party;
(vi) Defamation or slander against the impacted party, posting false information about
the impacted party and/or posing as the impacted party to post to websites, newsgroups,
blogs, or other sites that allow public contributions, encouraging others to harass
the impacted party;
(vii) Posing as someone other than oneself to initiate transactions, financial credit, loans, or
other contractual agreements;
(12) Supervisor: a person who has authority either: 1) to undertake or recommend tangible employment
decisions (those that significantly change an employee's employment status, such as, but not limited to,
hiring, firing, promoting, demoting, reviewing performance, reassigning, and compensation decisions)
affecting an employee, or 2) to direct the employee's daily work activities.
(13) Third-party reporter: a person who brings a complaint alleging that someone else has been
harassed. A third-party reporter does not need to be a member of the University community (i.e., a current
University faculty, staff, or student).
Effective January 2020, this policy has been revised. For individual changes, see the redlined version.
a. Acts by employees and students. The University's prohibition of harassment as defined by II-14.2 above applies to
acts of faculty, other instructors, staff, or students occurring in one or more of the following circumstances:
(2) at any location, including through electronic media such as email or social networking websites, and
involving any University faculty, staff, or students, provided that:
(b) The responding party or the impacted party was acting in an official capacity for the University
during the incident;
(c) The responding party or the impacted party was conducting University business during the
incident;
(d) The conduct has the purpose or reasonably foreseeable effect of substantially interfering with
the work or educational performance of UI students, faculty, or staff;
(e) The conduct creates an intimidating or hostile environment for anyone who is involved in or
seeks to participate in University employment, education, on-campus living, or other University-
sponsored activities; or
(f) The conduct demonstrates that the individual poses a reasonable threat to campus safety and
security.
b. Acts by persons other than employees or students. The University will make reasonable efforts to address
harassment of its faculty, other instructors, staff, or students by persons participating in University-related
programs or activities, conducting business with or visiting the University, even if such persons are not directly
affiliated with the University. Reports of harassment by visitors to campus and other persons not directly affiliated
with the University should be made to an academic or administrative officer or the Office of Equal Opportunity
and Diversity (319-335-0705).
Effective January 2020, this policy has been revised. For individual changes, see the redlined version.
a. Individuals who believe they have experienced harassment are encouraged to report it, even if they are not
certain whether a violation of this policy has occurred. Reports of protected class harassment (see II-3 Human
Rights) should be brought to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity under this policy. Reports also may be
directed separately to other offices under applicable policies and procedures as follows:
(1) Complaints that a student violated the rights of any member of the University community may be
investigated under a process initiated by the Dean of Students (such as, but not limited to, the Code of
Student Life;
(2) Complaints that a faculty member violated the rights of any member of the University community may
be investigated under a process initiated by the Provost (such as, but not limited to, III-15 Professional
Ethics and Academic Responsibility);
(3) Complaints that a staff member violated the rights of any member of the University community may be
investigated under a process initiated by the Senior Human Resources Leadership Representative for the
staff member's unit (such as, but not limited to, III-16 Ethics and Responsibilities for University of Iowa
Staff). The Senior Human Resources Leadership Representative may appoint a designee to conduct the
investigation with the approval of University Human Resources and the Office of Equal Opportunity and
Diversity.
b. A complaint that this policy has been violated may be brought through informal or formal channels by any
member of the University community, including a third-party reporter, or by the University itself. A complaint
must clearly state the allegations of harassment to warrant an investigation. There is no time limit for bringing a
complaint; however, it may be difficult to substantiate the allegations if they are made after significant time has
passed. Therefore, prompt reporting of complaints is strongly encouraged.
c. Substantial weight will be given to the wishes of the impacted party when determining how to respond to a
complaint. However, the University may investigate the allegations even without the impacted party's consent, if
circumstances warrant (such as when there are multiple complaints of harassment involving the same person or
allegations are particularly egregious).
d. Anyone (impacted parties or others) who wishes to consult with someone about a specific situation without
making a complaint, or who wishes simply to learn more about enforcement of this Anti-Harassment Policy may
contact any of the following offices or organizations: These offices are exempt from the reporting requirements
set forth below in II-14.5e. In addition, staff in these offices and organizations generally have professional or legal
obligations to keep communications with their clients confidential. Faculty and staff in other University offices
typically do not have confidentiality obligations and may be required to report allegations as described below in
II-14.5e.
(1) Office of the Ombudsperson (for faculty, staff, or students), 308 Jefferson Building;
(2) Employee Assistance Program (for faculty or staff), 121-50 University Services Building;
(4) Women's Resource and Action Center (for faculty, other instructors, staff, students, or visitors), Bowman
House;
(5) Domestic Violence Intervention Program (certified advocates) (for faculty, other instructors, staff,
students, or visitors), 1105 South Gilbert Court, Iowa City.
Effective January 2020, this policy has been revised. For individual changes, see the redlined version.
a. A complaint may be brought informally to any academic or administrative officer of the University (as defined
above in II-14.2g(1)). If the complaint alleges harassment based on a protected classification as defined by II-3
Human Rights (race, creed, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, pregnancy, disability, genetic information,
status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military, sexual orientation, gender identity, associational preferences,
or any other classification that deprives the person of consideration as an individual), the complaint should be
brought to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity (319-335-0705).
(1) counsel the impacted or reporting party as to the options available under this policy and, at the
impacted party's request, will help the impacted party resolve the complaint informally and/or refer the
impacted party to the appropriate office as described below in II-14.6a so that the impacted party may
bring a formal complaint; and
(2) take appropriate interim action, which may include those actions described below in II-14.10, to
address the alleged behavior and protect the health or safety of the impacted party, reporting party,
and/or witnesses.
(1) The Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity will assist in determining whether there is a potential
policy violation related to a protected classification, and whether reporting pursuant to paragraph e below
is required.
(2) The Threat Assessment Team is available to assist with assessing situations and risk, planning the
actions needed, and carrying out those actions. This team may be accessed by contacting Organizational
Effectiveness, 121-50 University Services Building. (See also VI-32 University of Iowa Threat Assessment
Program or https://hr.uiowa.edu/tat.)
(3) For situations involving students, contact the Dean of Students, 135 Iowa Memorial Union.
d. Substantial weight will be given to the wishes of the impacted party when determining how to respond to a
complaint. When a complaint is brought informally, the person(s) charged in the complaint will not ordinarily be
informed of the complaint without the consent of the impacted party unless circumstances require (such as when
there are multiple complaints against the same person or allegations are particularly egregious). No disciplinary
action can be taken against a person, and there will be no record of the allegations in the person's employment or
student disciplinary file, unless the person is notified of the allegations and given an opportunity to respond.
e. Any academic or administrative officer of the University who becomes aware of specific and credible allegations
of harassment based on a protected classification (race, creed, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, pregnancy,
disability, genetic information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military, sexual orientation, gender
identity, associational preferences, or any other classification that deprives the person of consideration as an
individual), whether through the report of an impacted or a reporting party (including a third-party reporter) or
otherwise, shall report the allegations promptly to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity for assistance in
evaluating the situation and determining an appropriate course of action, even if the impacted party has
requested that no action be taken.
If there is a supervisory relationship between the reporting party and/or impacted party and the responding
party, the appropriate course of action will include development of a plan to avoid any perceived or actual
conflict of interest until the complaint is resolved.
The initial report may be verbal, but a written report also must be made after the complaint is resolved using the
Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity Informal Harassment Complaint Resolution form, which requires
disclosure of the employment or student status of the impacted party(ies), the reporting party(ies) (if other than
the impacted party), and the person(s) charged; the department(s) with which those persons are affiliated; a
summary of the allegations; and a description of the steps taken to resolve the complaint.
If the person alleged to have engaged in harassment was notified of the existence of the informal complaint and
given an opportunity to respond, the names of the parties must be provided to the Office of Equal Opportunity
and Diversity. If the person was not informed of the allegations or was not given an opportunity to respond, then
the names of the parties shall not be provided to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity.
f. Reasonable efforts will be made to process complaints within 21 days, giving consideration to the nature of the
allegations and the circumstances surrounding the complaint process.
g. It is the responsibility of the academic or administrative officer who facilitates the informal resolution of the
complaint to monitor compliance with the terms of the informal resolution. Sanctions up to and including
termination of employment or separation from the University may be imposed in the event that an individual fails
to comply with the terms of the informal resolution.
Effective January 2020, this policy has been revised. For individual changes, see the redlined version.
a. A formal complaint pursuant to this policy must be brought to one of the following offices for investigation
depending upon the status of the responding party and the nature of the allegations:
(1) Protected class harassment. If the complaint alleges harassment based on a classification covered by II-
3 Human Rights (race, creed, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, pregnancy, disability, genetic
information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military, sexual orientation, gender identity,
associational preferences, or any other classification that deprives the person of consideration as an
individual), a formal complaint should be brought to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity (202
Jessup Hall, 319-335-0705) regardless of the status of the responding party.
(2) Other harassment. If the complaint alleges harassment that is not based on a classification covered
by II-3 Human Rights (race, creed, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, pregnancy, disability, genetic
information, status as a U.S. veteran, service in the U.S. military, sexual orientation, gender identity,
associational preferences, or any other classification that deprives the person of consideration as an
individual), a person should bring a formal complaint to one of the following offices depending on the
status of the responding party:
(a) Faculty or instructor. If the responding party is a faculty member, teaching assistant, or other
instructor, a formal complaint should be brought to the responding party's collegiate dean or to the
Office of the Provost (111 Jessup Hall, 319-335-3565);
(b) Staff member. If the responding party is a staff member, a formal complaint should be brought to
the Senior Human Resources Leadership Representative for the unit employing the responding
party;
(c) Student. If the responding party is a student, a formal complaint should be brought to the Dean
of Students (135 Iowa Memorial Union, 319-335-1162) or the Dean of the Graduate College (201
Gilmore Hall, 319-335-2143).
b. A formal complaint may be brought after an informal resolution was not successfully reached, or may be brought
immediately without pursuing informal resolution.
c. The purpose of the investigation is to establish whether there is a reasonable basis for believing that a violation of
this policy has occurred. In conducting the investigation, the investigating office will make reasonable efforts to
interview the impacted party, the reporting party (if other than the impacted party), and the responding party,
and may interview other persons believed to have pertinent factual knowledge, as well as review any relevant
documentary evidence. At all times, the investigating office will take steps to ensure confidentiality to the extent
possible.
d. When a formal complaint is brought, the responding party will be informed of the allegations, the identity of the
impacted and/or reporting party, and the facts surrounding the allegations. The investigation will afford the
responding party an opportunity to respond to the allegations and evidence provided by the reporting
party and/or impacted party, and to provide a statement of the facts as perceived by the responding party.
e. At the conclusion of the investigation, the investigating office will issue a written finding which will summarize the
evidence gathered and state whether or not there is a reasonable basis for believing that a violation of this policy
has occurred. The written finding will normally be issued within 60 days of when the complaint was filed. When it
is not reasonably possible to issue the finding within 60 days, the investigating office will notify the impacted
party and the responding party that the finding will be delayed and indicate the reasons for the delay. The
impacted party and the responding party will receive a copy of the written finding, which is to remain confidential
as defined below by II-14.12c. Third-party reporters will be notified only that the proceedings are concluded.
f. If the investigating office finds a reasonable basis for believing that a violation of this policy has occurred, the
matter will be referred to the appropriate administrator for further consideration as outlined in II-14.7 below.
Effective January 2020, this policy has been revised. For individual changes, see the redlined version.
a. The following administrators will review the finding of the investigating office:
(1) the Office of the Provost, if the responding party is a faculty member or other instructional personnel
(except graduate assistants);
(2) the office of the vice president or dean responsible for the unit employing the person charged, if the
responding party is a staff member (including a graduate assistant, in which case the Dean of the Graduate
College also must be notified in order to determine whether ramifications apply for the student's academic
progress);
(3) the Dean of Students, if the responding party is a student (including a graduate student, in which case
the Dean of the Graduate College also must be notified in order to determine whether ramifications apply
for the student's academic progress);
(1) accept all or any part of the findings of the investigating office;
(2) not accept all or any part of the findings of the investigating office;
(3) reach a negotiated settlement of the complaint with the responding party; or
c. Violations of this Anti-Harassment Policy may lead to disciplinary sanctions up to and including termination or
separation from the University. Sanctions for violations of this policy should be commensurate with the nature of
the violation and the responding party's disciplinary history.
d. In addition to other disciplinary action, persons who are found to have violated this policy may be required to
participate in policy and behavioral expectations education. They also may be required to complete community
service, enroll in a specific academic course, attend an educational workshop, and/or make restitution for
economic damages caused by their behavior.
When the responding party is a faculty or staff member, the Employee Assistance Program, 121-50 University
Service Building, is available to assist with locating appropriate resources. When the responding party is a
student, University Counseling Service, 3223 Westlawn, is available to assist with locating appropriate resources.
e. It is the responsibility of the appropriate administrator to follow-up with the parties at a reasonable interval(s) to
assess their compliance with the disciplinary and/or remedial sanctions imposed. More serious sanctions, up to
and including termination of employment or separation from the University, may be imposed in the event that
the individual fails to comply with the sanctions initially imposed.
Formal disciplinary action taken in response to alleged violations of this policy by:
a. tenure track, clinical track, and research track faculty members will be governed by the Faculty Dispute
Procedures (III-29) and that portion of those procedures dealing with faculty ethics (III-29.7); instructional track
faculty members will be governed by III-10.11 Instructional Track policy and the grievance procedures therein.
b. staff members will be governed by applicable Regents Merit System Rules and University policies, including III-
16 Ethics and Responsibility Statement for Staff, and the applicable grievance procedures, including III-28
Conflict Management Resources for University Staff;
c. graduate assistants, when dismissal is sought, will be governed by the procedure for dismissal of graduate
assistants (III-12.4). When disciplinary action other than dismissal is taken by the dean of the employing college, a
graduate assistant may appeal through those procedures established for graduate assistant employees;
This section addresses isolated behavior that does not rise to the level of a violation of this policy. However, it should be
understood that isolated behavior that is sufficiently severe can constitute harassment in violation of this policy. The
purpose of this section is preventative, in that it authorizes and encourages appropriate intervention designed to avoid a
violation of this policy. However, this section shall not apply to constitutionally protected speech as provided in II-14.2c
above.
a. Isolated behavior of the kind described in II-14.2, which does not rise to the level of harassment but which if
repeated could rise to that level, demonstrates insensitivity that may warrant remedial measures. Academic or
administrative officers who become aware of such behavior in their areas should counsel those who have
engaged in the behavior. Such counsel should include a clear statement that the behavior is not acceptable and
should cease, information about the potential consequences if such behavior persists, and a recommendation, as
appropriate, to undertake an educational program designed to help the person(s) understand the harm caused
by the behavior.
b. After such counseling occurs, if a person continues to engage in the conduct described above in paragraph a, they
may be deemed to have engaged in harassment.
Effective January and March 2020, this policy has been revised. For individual changes, see the redlined version.
a. Impacted parties will be informed of relevant procedural steps taken during the investigation and any interim
protective measures taken. An impacted party may be accompanied by an advocate and other support persons
during the investigation process if the impacted party so desires.
b. Throughout the investigation and resolution of a complaint, steps will be taken to protect impacted parties,
reporting parties, witnesses, and others from harm caused by continuation of the alleged harassing behavior.
c. Retaliation against impacted parties, reporting parties, and/or witnesses who provide information during an
investigation pursuant to this policy is prohibited by II-11 Anti-Retaliation. Reasonable action will be taken to
assure that impacted parties, reporting parties, and/or witnesses suffer no retaliation as a result of their activities
with regard to the process.
d. Steps that may be taken to protect impacted parties, reporting parties, witnesses, and others from continued
harassment and/or retaliation might include:
(1) lateral transfers of one or more of the parties in an employment setting and a comparable move if a
classroom setting is involved, and
(2) arrangement that academic and/or employment evaluations concerning reporting parties or others be
made by an appropriate individual other than the responding party.
e. Any retaliation against impacted parties, reporting parties or witnesses should be reported pursuant to the Anti-
Retaliation Policy (II-11). Retaliation may result in disciplinary action against the person committing the
retaliatory act(s).
f. The Provost, a dean, a DEO, or any vice president may, at any time during or after an investigation of allegations of
harassment, place on leave or otherwise restrict from employment and/or access to campus any responding
party if the Provost, dean, DEO, or vice president finds that it is reasonably certain that:
(2) serious and immediate harm will ensue if the person continues to be present at work. Similarly, if the
responding party is a student, interim sanctions may be imposed pursuant to Section 10 of the Student
Misconduct Procedure.
Effective January 2020, this policy has been revised. For individual changes, see the redlined version.
This policy shall not be used to bring knowingly false or malicious allegations of harassment. Making such allegations
may subject the complaining party to remedial and/or disciplinary action up to and including termination or separation
from the University. Any such disciplinary action will be initiated by the appropriate administrator overseeing the
reporting party(ies).
14.12 Confidentiality
(Amended 1/20)
Effective January 2020, this policy has been revised. For individual changes, see the redlined version.
a. In order to empower community members to voice concerns and bring complaints, the confidentiality of all
parties will be protected to the greatest extent possible. However, confidentiality cannot be guaranteed in all
cases, and legal obligations may require the University to take some action once it is made aware that
harassment may be occurring, even when the impacted party is reluctant to proceed. Appropriate University
officials will be consulted, including the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity when the complaint alleges
harassment based on a protected classification (see II-14.5e above), and information will be shared only with
those individuals who need to know it to implement this policy.
b. Impacted parties, third-party reporters, and responding parties are expected to maintain confidentiality as well.
They are not prohibited from discussing the situation outside of the work or educational environment. However,
the matter should not be discussed in the work or educational environment.
c. Dissemination of documents relating to complaints of harassment and/or to the investigation of such complaints,
other than as necessary to pursue an appeal, grievance, or other legal or administrative proceeding, is prohibited.
d. Failure to maintain confidentiality by a responding party may be considered to be a form of retaliation in violation
of II-14.10c of this policy. Failure to maintain confidentiality by any party (impacted party, third-party reporter, or
responding party) may result in disciplinary action.
14.13 Education
(9/18)
Training on this policy is included with the mandatory training prescribed in the University's Interim Policy on Sexual
Harassment and Sexual Misconduct (see II-4.22b).
Doyle Appx. 533 STATE 780