The document discusses the differences between Homo sapiens and Neanderthals, specifically focusing on their skull shapes and language abilities. While Neanderthal skulls were flat as infants, Homo sapien skulls were round, allowing fully articulate speech. This gave Homo sapiens an advantage in communication. The document explores how this ability to speak may have allowed Homo sapiens to survive while Neanderthals died off, despite Neanderthals having larger brains and impressive skills like cave paintings. It speculates communication abilities and curiosity may have distinguished the species, driving Homo sapiens' advancement with technology and exploration. Overall, the document analyzes how the evolution of language 300,000 years ago
The document discusses the differences between Homo sapiens and Neanderthals, specifically focusing on their skull shapes and language abilities. While Neanderthal skulls were flat as infants, Homo sapien skulls were round, allowing fully articulate speech. This gave Homo sapiens an advantage in communication. The document explores how this ability to speak may have allowed Homo sapiens to survive while Neanderthals died off, despite Neanderthals having larger brains and impressive skills like cave paintings. It speculates communication abilities and curiosity may have distinguished the species, driving Homo sapiens' advancement with technology and exploration. Overall, the document analyzes how the evolution of language 300,000 years ago
The document discusses the differences between Homo sapiens and Neanderthals, specifically focusing on their skull shapes and language abilities. While Neanderthal skulls were flat as infants, Homo sapien skulls were round, allowing fully articulate speech. This gave Homo sapiens an advantage in communication. The document explores how this ability to speak may have allowed Homo sapiens to survive while Neanderthals died off, despite Neanderthals having larger brains and impressive skills like cave paintings. It speculates communication abilities and curiosity may have distinguished the species, driving Homo sapiens' advancement with technology and exploration. Overall, the document analyzes how the evolution of language 300,000 years ago
The video entitled “Homo Sapiens vs Neanderthals||The Evolution of Language” was a
cut documentary from Miracle Planet made by Daniel Toussaint. It tackles about Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals, specifically, their distinctions. The video discussed the difference on their skulls wherein Neanderthals’ skull base is flat but for Homo Sapiens it’s round and quite advantageous although it was stated that newborn homo sapiens have the same configuration with Neanderthals but changes when they grow. Thus, sets Homo Sapiens apart from any other species as it allows them to be fully articulate when they speak. Hence, gave them the advantage when it comes to proper communication. It’s quite astounding for me to know that what allowed us to survive up until this very day is our ability to speak which unfortunately, Neanderthals do not possess. In which, left me questioning myself regarding what would be the case if Neanderthals had the ability to have proper communication. Although, I can’t deny the fact that I was fascinated when they discovered that although, Neanderthals aren’t that intelligent as modern humans they still had those impressive skills to make those cave paintings that seems like more of a modern art. Not to mention, they also had their own music, culture, and hunting equipment. Some informations were new to me and I felt excited to know more especially the thing about how we evolved and keep evolving as time pass by. I do really want to know more about the “FOXP2” which was said to have a great impact with our ability to speak. It indeed made me curious as to whether FOXP2 is the main driver of the evolution of language in humans. Though as stated in the documentary it’s not yet proven but one thing is for sure, there’s a bigger puzzle to solve here. Another thing that I found amazing is how Neanderthals survived the ice age when none of us could have done so. Neanderthals survived in the harshest condition humankind have ever lived in for over 100K years. However, there are things in the documentary that made me confused which is according to latest studies Neanderthals actually has larger brain than Homo Sapiens. Additionally, they are a bit shorter than modern humans. Furthermore, I genuinely think that what truly distinguishes us from Neanderthals is our way of thinking, as modern humans have the capacity to be intricately curious and think beyond imagination, as well as our ability to socialize, as I presume that although Neanderthals do not have the capacity to communicate in the same way that we do, they still have a means of communicating with one another, it's just that they lack the ability to be curious about things around them. Unlike us, Homo Sapiens, who, as I already mentioned, were drawn to the technology era by our capacity to speak and our natural curiosity. As a result, we are able to learn more about both known and unknown things in the world. For instance, as seen in the documentary, modern science now has the ability to explore down to the molecular level. Which piqued my interest in seeing what greater we could accomplish with the existing resources we have. In conclusion, it made me realized how important language is, especially 300, 000 years ago when it is very crucial. The evolution of language brought us to where we are right now. Together with the ability of Homo Sapiens to speak fluently paved our way to many technological invention in which allows us to dig deeper into the known and unknown things in this world. Though there are still things about human speech that hasn’t been discovered and proven we can say for sure that soon enough, the whole puzzle will finally be completed.