FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=Gender Lulusan Lama Area Nilai1 Nilai2

Nilai3 Nilai4 Nilai5 Titel Predikat1

        Predikat2 Predikat3 Predikat
    /ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Frequencies

Notes
Output Created 16-SEP-2021 04:52:48
Comments
Input Data C:\Users\User\Documents\
Skripsi Ayah\Penilaian
Etik.sav
Active Dataset DataSet1
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data 83
File
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values
are treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics are based on all
cases with valid data.
Syntax FREQUENCIES
VARIABLES=Gender
Lulusan Lama Area Nilai1
Nilai2 Nilai3 Nilai4 Nilai5 Titel
Predikat1
        Predikat2 Predikat3
Predikat
    /ORDER=ANALYSIS.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00,00
Elapsed Time 00:00:00,01
 Statistics
Jenis Kelamin Lama kerja Nilai Perawat -
Responden Pendidikan responden Area Klinis Klien
N Valid 83 83 83 83 83
Missing 0 0 0 0 0

Statistics
Nilai Perawat - Nilai Perawat - Nilai Perawat - Nilai Perawat - Hasil Penilaian
Praktik Masyarakat Teman Sejawat Profesi Etik
N Valid 83 83 83 83 83
Missing 0 0 0 0 0

Statistics
Penilaian Sikap Penilaian Kinerja Penilaian Mutu Penilaian Kinerja
Kerja Pelayanan Pelayanan Perawat
N Valid 83 83 83 83
Missing 0 0 0 0

Frequency Table

Jenis Kelamin Responden

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Laki-laki 15 18.1 18.1 18.1
Perempuan 68 81.9 81.9 100.0
Total 83 100.0 100.0

Pendidikan
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid D3 50 60.2 60.2 60.2
S1 33 39.8 39.8 100.0
Total 83 100.0 100.0
 Lama kerja responden
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Standar 14 16.9 16.9 16.9
Optimal 69 83.1 83.1 100.0
Total 83 100.0 100.0

Area Klinis
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Anak 16 19.3 19.3 19.3
Bedah 16 19.3 19.3 38.6
Gadar 9 10.8 10.8 49.4
Kritis 9 10.8 10.8 60.2
Medikal 33 39.8 39.8 100.0
Total 83 100.0 100.0

Nilai Perawat - Klien

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Baik 83 100.0 100.0 100.0

Nilai Perawat - Praktik

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Baik 83 100.0 100.0 100.0

Nilai Perawat - Masyarakat

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Baik 28 33.7 33.7 33.7
Buruk 2 2.4 2.4 36.1
Cukup 53 63.9 63.9 100.0
Total 83 100.0 100.0
 Nilai Perawat - Teman Sejawat
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Baik 77 92.8 92.8 92.8
Cukup 6 7.2 7.2 100.0
Total 83 100.0 100.0

Nilai Perawat - Profesi

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Baik 27 32.5 32.5 32.5
Buruk 20 24.1 24.1 56.6
Cukup 36 43.4 43.4 100.0
Total 83 100.0 100.0

Hasil Penilaian Etik

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Baik 79 95.2 95.2 95.2
Cukup 4 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 83 100.0 100.0

Penilaian Sikap Kerja

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Baik 46 55.4 55.4 55.4
Cukup 37 44.6 44.6 100.0
Total 83 100.0 100.0

Penilaian Kinerja Pelayanan

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Baik 51 61.4 61.4 61.4
Cukup 32 38.6 38.6 100.0
Total 83 100.0 100.0
 Penilaian Mutu Pelayanan
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Baik 65 78.3 78.3 78.3
Cukup 18 21.7 21.7 100.0
Total 83 100.0 100.0

Penilaian Kinerja Perawat

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Baik 67 80.7 80.7 80.7
Cukup 16 19.3 19.3 100.0
Total 83 100.0 100.0

CROSSTABS
    /TABLES=Nilai1 Nilai2 Nilai3 Nilai4 Nilai5 BY Predikat1
Predikat2 Predikat3
    /FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
    /STATISTICS=CHISQ
    /CELLS=COUNT
    /COUNT ROUND CELL.
Crosstabs

Notes
Output Created 16-SEP-2021 04:55:18
Comments
Input Data C:\Users\User\Documents\
Skripsi Ayah\Penilaian
Etik.sav
Active Dataset DataSet1
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data 83
File
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values
are treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics for each table are
based on all the cases with
valid data in the specified
range(s) for all variables in
each table.
Syntax CROSSTABS
    /TABLES=Nilai1 Nilai2
Nilai3 Nilai4 Nilai5 BY
Predikat1 Predikat2
Predikat3
    /FORMAT=AVALUE
TABLES
    /STATISTICS=CHISQ
    /CELLS=COUNT
    /COUNT ROUND CELL.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00,02
Elapsed Time 00:00:00,02
Dimensions Requested 2
 Cells Available 524245

Warnings
No measures of association are computed for the crosstabulation of
Nilai Perawat - Klien * Penilaian Sikap Kerja. At least one variable
in each 2-way table upon which measures of association are
computed is a constant.
No measures of association are computed for the crosstabulation of
Nilai Perawat - Klien * Penilaian Kinerja Pelayanan. At least one
variable in each 2-way table upon which measures of association
are computed is a constant.
No measures of association are computed for the crosstabulation of
Nilai Perawat - Klien * Penilaian Mutu Pelayanan. At least one
variable in each 2-way table upon which measures of association
are computed is a constant.
No measures of association are computed for the crosstabulation of
Nilai Perawat - Praktik * Penilaian Sikap Kerja. At least one variable
in each 2-way table upon which measures of association are
computed is a constant.
No measures of association are computed for the crosstabulation of
Nilai Perawat - Praktik * Penilaian Kinerja Pelayanan. At least one
variable in each 2-way table upon which measures of association
are computed is a constant.
No measures of association are computed for the crosstabulation of
Nilai Perawat - Praktik * Penilaian Mutu Pelayanan. At least one
variable in each 2-way table upon which measures of association
are computed is a constant.

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Nilai Perawat - Klien * 83 100.0% 0 0.0% 83 100.0%
Penilaian Sikap Kerja
Nilai Perawat - Klien * 83 100.0% 0 0.0% 83 100.0%
Penilaian Kinerja Pelayanan
Nilai Perawat - Klien * 83 100.0% 0 0.0% 83 100.0%
Penilaian Mutu Pelayanan
Nilai Perawat - Praktik * 83 100.0% 0 0.0% 83 100.0%
Penilaian Sikap Kerja
Nilai Perawat - Praktik * 83 100.0% 0 0.0% 83 100.0%
Penilaian Kinerja Pelayanan
Nilai Perawat - Praktik * 83 100.0% 0 0.0% 83 100.0%
Penilaian Mutu Pelayanan
Nilai Perawat - Masyarakat * 83 100.0% 0 0.0% 83 100.0%
Penilaian Sikap Kerja
Nilai Perawat - Masyarakat * 83 100.0% 0 0.0% 83 100.0%
Penilaian Kinerja Pelayanan
Nilai Perawat - Masyarakat * 83 100.0% 0 0.0% 83 100.0%
Penilaian Mutu Pelayanan
Nilai Perawat - Teman 83 100.0% 0 0.0% 83 100.0%
Sejawat * Penilaian Sikap
Kerja
Nilai Perawat - Teman 83 100.0% 0 0.0% 83 100.0%
Sejawat * Penilaian Kinerja
Pelayanan
Nilai Perawat - Teman 83 100.0% 0 0.0% 83 100.0%
Sejawat * Penilaian Mutu
Pelayanan
Nilai Perawat - Profesi * 83 100.0% 0 0.0% 83 100.0%
Penilaian Sikap Kerja
Nilai Perawat - Profesi * 83 100.0% 0 0.0% 83 100.0%
Penilaian Kinerja Pelayanan
Nilai Perawat - Profesi * 83 100.0% 0 0.0% 83 100.0%
Penilaian Mutu Pelayanan

Nilai Perawat - Klien * Penilaian Sikap Kerja

Crosstab
Count   
Penilaian Sikap Kerja
Baik Cukup Total
Nilai Perawat - Klien Baik 46 37 83
Total 46 37 83
 Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square .a
N of Valid Cases 83

a. No statistics are computed

because Nilai Perawat - Klien is a
constant.

Nilai Perawat - Klien * Penilaian Kinerja Pelayanan

Crosstab
Count   
Penilaian Kinerja Pelayanan
Baik Cukup Total
Nilai Perawat - Klien Baik 51 32 83
Total 51 32 83

Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square .a
N of Valid Cases 83

a. No statistics are computed

because Nilai Perawat - Klien is a
constant.

Nilai Perawat - Klien * Penilaian Mutu Pelayanan

Crosstab
Count   
Penilaian Mutu Pelayanan
Baik Cukup Total
Nilai Perawat - Klien Baik 65 18 83
Total 65 18 83
 Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square .a
N of Valid Cases 83

a. No statistics are computed

because Nilai Perawat - Klien is a
constant.

Nilai Perawat - Praktik * Penilaian Sikap Kerja

Crosstab
Count   
Penilaian Sikap Kerja
Baik Cukup Total
Nilai Perawat - Praktik Baik 46 37 83
Total 46 37 83

Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square .a
N of Valid Cases 83

a. No statistics are computed

because Nilai Perawat - Praktik is a
constant.

Nilai Perawat - Praktik * Penilaian Kinerja Pelayanan

Crosstab
Count   
Penilaian Kinerja Pelayanan
Baik Cukup Total
Nilai Perawat - Praktik Baik 51 32 83
Total 51 32 83
 Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square .a
N of Valid Cases 83

a. No statistics are computed

because Nilai Perawat - Praktik is a
constant.

Nilai Perawat - Praktik * Penilaian Mutu Pelayanan

Crosstab
Count   
Penilaian Mutu Pelayanan
Baik Cukup Total
Nilai Perawat - Praktik Baik 65 18 83
Total 65 18 83

Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square .a
N of Valid Cases 83

a. No statistics are computed because

Nilai Perawat - Praktik is a constant.

Nilai Perawat - Masyarakat * Penilaian Sikap Kerja

Crosstab
Count   
Penilaian Sikap Kerja
Baik Cukup Total
Nilai Perawat - Masyarakat Baik 21 7 28
Buruk 1 1 2
 Cukup 24 29 53
Total 46 37 83

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 6.573a 2 .037

Likelihood Ratio 6.820 2 .033

N of Valid Cases 83

a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .89.

Nilai Perawat - Masyarakat * Penilaian Kinerja Pelayanan

Crosstab
Count   
Penilaian Kinerja Pelayanan
Baik Cukup Total
Nilai Perawat - Masyarakat Baik 20 8 28
Buruk 1 1 2
Cukup 30 23 53
Total 51 32 83

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.813 a
2 .404
Likelihood Ratio 1.852 2 .396
N of Valid Cases 83

a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .77.
Nilai Perawat - Masyarakat * Penilaian Mutu Pelayanan

Crosstab
Count   
Penilaian Mutu Pelayanan
Baik Cukup Total
Nilai Perawat - Masyarakat Baik 25 3 28
Buruk 1 1 2
Cukup 39 14 53
Total 65 18 83

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.627a 2 .163
Likelihood Ratio 3.764 2 .152
N of Valid Cases 83

a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .43.

Nilai Perawat - Teman Sejawat * Penilaian Sikap Kerja

Crosstab
Count   
Penilaian Sikap Kerja
Baik Cukup Total
Nilai Perawat - Teman Baik 44 33 77
Sejawat Cukup 2 4 6
Total 46 37 83
 Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.277a 1 .258
Continuity Correction b
.495 1 .482
Likelihood Ratio 1.279 1 .258
Fisher's Exact Test .400 .240
N of Valid Cases 83

a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.67.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Nilai Perawat - Teman Sejawat * Penilaian Kinerja Pelayanan

Crosstab
Count   
Penilaian Kinerja Pelayanan
Baik Cukup Total
Nilai Perawat - Teman Baik 50 27 77
Sejawat Cukup 1 5 6
Total 51 32 83

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5.474 a
1 .019
Continuity Correction b
3.626 1 .057
Likelihood Ratio 5.499 1 .019
Fisher's Exact Test .030 .030
N of Valid Cases 83

a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.31.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Nilai Perawat - Teman Sejawat * Penilaian Mutu Pelayanan

Crosstab
Count   
Penilaian Mutu Pelayanan
Baik Cukup Total
Nilai Perawat - Teman Baik 61 16 77
Sejawat Cukup 4 2 6
Total 65 18 83

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .517 a
1 .472
Continuity Correction b
.042 1 .838
Likelihood Ratio .469 1 .493
Fisher's Exact Test .606 .387
N of Valid Cases 83

a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.30.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Nilai Perawat - Profesi * Penilaian Sikap Kerja

Crosstab
Count   
Penilaian Sikap Kerja
Baik Cukup Total
Nilai Perawat - Profesi Baik 15 12 27
Buruk 11 9 20
Cukup 20 16 36
Total 46 37 83

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .002 a
2 .999
Likelihood Ratio .002 2 .999
N of Valid Cases 83

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is 8.92.

Nilai Perawat - Profesi * Penilaian Kinerja Pelayanan

Crosstab
Count   
Penilaian Kinerja Pelayanan
Baik Cukup Total
Nilai Perawat - Profesi Baik 18 9 27
Buruk 9 11 20
Cukup 24 12 36
Total 51 32 83

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.008 a
2 .222
Likelihood Ratio 2.948 2 .229
N of Valid Cases 83

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is 7.71.
Nilai Perawat - Profesi * Penilaian Mutu Pelayanan

Crosstab
Count   
Penilaian Mutu Pelayanan
Baik Cukup Total
Nilai Perawat - Profesi Baik 27 0 27
Buruk 15 5 20
Cukup 23 13 36
Total 65 18 83

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 12.016 a
2 .002
Likelihood Ratio 17.218 2 .000
N of Valid Cases 83

a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is 4.34.
CROSSTABS
    /TABLES=Titel BY Predikat
    /FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
    /STATISTICS=CHISQ
    /CELLS=COUNT
    /COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs

Notes
Output Created 16-SEP-2021 04:56:02
Comments
Input Data C:\Users\User\Documents\
Skripsi Ayah\Penilaian
Etik.sav
Active Dataset DataSet1
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data 83
File
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values
are treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics for each table are
based on all the cases with
valid data in the specified
range(s) for all variables in
each table.
Syntax CROSSTABS
    /TABLES=Titel BY Predikat
    /FORMAT=AVALUE
TABLES
    /STATISTICS=CHISQ
    /CELLS=COUNT
    /COUNT ROUND CELL.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00,00
Elapsed Time 00:00:00,02
Dimensions Requested 2
Cells Available 524245

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Hasil Penilaian Etik * 83 100.0% 0 0.0% 83 100.0%
Penilaian Kinerja Perawat

Hasil Penilaian Etik * Penilaian Kinerja Perawat

Crosstabulation
Count   
Penilaian Kinerja Perawat
Baik Cukup Total
Hasil Penilaian Etik Baik 66 13 79
Cukup 1 3 4
Total 67 16 83

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.386a 1 .004
Continuity Correction b
5.045 1 .025
Likelihood Ratio 6.228 1 .013
Fisher's Exact Test .021 .021
N of Valid Cases 83

a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .77.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table