Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS - HouseBills

    Uploaded by

    Lily Ann D. Bautista
    6 views2 pages
    This document compares and contrasts key provisions of 3 House Bills (HB 5132, HB 5505, HB 5865) related to the regulation of physical therapists in the Philippines. The bills are generally similar and propose establishing a Physical Therapy Commission and Board. However, some key differences are noted, such as the composition of the proposed Board, scope of practice definitions, and qualifications for registration. Other minor differences relate to terminology used for licenses/permits and provisions regarding integration with professional organizations. Overall the bills appear aimed at standardizing and strengthening regulation of physical therapists while allowing for evolution of the profession over time.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document compares and contrasts key provisions of 3 House Bills (HB 5132, HB 5505, HB 5865) related to the regulation of physical therapists in the Philippines. The bills are generally similar and propose establishing a Physical Therapy Commission and Board. However, some key differences are noted, such as the composition of the proposed Board, scope of practice definitions, and qualifications for registration. Other minor differences relate to terminology used for licenses/permits and provisions regarding integration with professional organizations. Overall the bills appear aimed at standardizing and strengthening regulation of physical therapists while allowing for evolution of the profession over time.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS - HouseBills

    Uploaded by

    Lily Ann D. Bautista
    This document compares and contrasts key provisions of 3 House Bills (HB 5132, HB 5505, HB 5865) related to the regulation of physical therapists in the Philippines. The bills are generally similar and propose establishing a Physical Therapy Commission and Board. However, some key differences are noted, such as the composition of the proposed Board, scope of practice definitions, and qualifications for registration. Other minor differences relate to terminology used for licenses/permits and provisions regarding integration with professional organizations. Overall the bills appear aimed at standardizing and strengthening regulation of physical therapists while allowing for evolution of the profession over time.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

    HB 5132 HB 5505 HB 5865 Other comments


    Rep Maximo Y. Dalog Jr Rep Aurelio D. Gonzales Jr Rep Kristine Alexie B. Tutor
    Statement of Policy (2) it shall establish standards Preferred statement of policy
    for physical therapists in linking
    PHC to CBR (why with special
    mention to CBR?) – should
    represent the various facets of
    PT
    Definition of terms Good - more complete. Also Old definition from RA 5680 Good
    defining specialization
    Scope and Nature Missing 5132 and 5865 similar
    PRC Board 1 Chair, 3 members (from a list 1 Chair and 2 members 1 chair and 4 members (upon
    of 6 recommendees from PRC, (nominated by AIPO, upon recommendation of commission
    from 4 nominees each position recommendation of PRC) as nominated by AIPO)
    from AIPO) – too many!
    Roles and Qualification of the 5 years of PT engagement 5 years of PT engagement 10 years of PT engagement Similar all 3 HBs, except as noted
    Board; Term of office, Removal,
    Compensation, Supervision, Section 7o: “Grant registration
    Secretariat, Annual report without examination subject to
    approval by the Commission”
    What does this mean??
    Board exam requirement and Same all HBs
    qualification
    Scope of coverage Section 16a and 16d not Listing it in this detail will cause AGREEABLE TO THE
    defined, but 16b and 16c: incl a restriction year from now. TERMINOLOGIES USED IN THIS
    Special population, Pedia, Geria Healthcare is evolving, these HB. As this allows room for
    CBR, Ethics, Org, Mx. Why with topics and the importance might changes, subject to approval of
    special mention to these topics. change the Board and considers the
    And per CMO 55, Research only minimum standards for the PT
    required for universities. Only profession based on latest
    EBP is a requirement developments
    Ratings, Reporting, Issuances, With COR (Certificate of Similar except as noted
    Initial, Refusal to register, Registration) and PIC
    Reinstatement, Receipt, Roster, (professional Identification card)
    Special Permits ??
    Practice of PT Sec 27: “Physical Therapists Similar except as noted
    shall collaborate with
    stakeholders in order to provide
    the most effective, cost-efficient
    and client centered service”
    (should the word be “shall?”)
    Code of Ethics; CPD Program All HBs same
    Integration of PTs ; Professional Integration of Physical Integration of Physical Integration of Professional Same but titled different
    Org Therapists Therapists Organization
    Penal and Misc Provisions Sec 35 IRR: in coordination with Sec 34. Transitory Provisions Similar except as noted
    AIPO on IRR (not stated on the “seems to be a typo. A person
    other 2 HBs) holding a license to practice PT,
    issued by the Board of PT and
    OT…”

    You might also like